ISOLATIONISM REDUX History and the Current Crisis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ISOLATIONISM REDUX History and the Current Crisis ISOLATIONISM REDUX History and the Current Crisis A White Paper by Executive Summary: Ronald Radosh In this paper, leading American historian Ronald Radosh describes how the antiwar protests that emerged during the Iraq intervention revived the slogans and clichés of the isolationist movement in America before the Second World War. In both cases, opponents of military action concentrated on allegations that war was motivated by illegitimate economic interests, that America was abusing its power, that imperialism was becoming the focus of American policy, that militarism and repression were increasing, and that America risked making new enemies in the world. Although claims that Iraq was a quagmire also echo the protest idiom of the Vietnam era, such charges had also, originally, been voiced at the end of the 1930s. Professor Radosh’s arguments links these to a dangerous, anti-democratic alliance of ultra-leftists and neo-fascists. “THESE are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily May 2003 conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.” – Thomas Paine, The Crisis, 1776 The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies The Foundation for the It had to happen. The naysayers opposed The U.S. is merely new imperialism, acting Defense of Democracies to the campaign for liberation of Iraq, and to advance its interests throughout the world. the doomsday scenario they laid out, struck Fourth: War means militarism and those of us with knowledge of history with repression at home. This is alleged to include an eerie sense of déjà vu. The isolationism erosion of civil liberties guaranteed by the that was employed to undermine American Bill of Rights, and the transformation of the will and self-confidence in fighting the United States into a repressive authoritarian fascist and militarist aggressors in World regime similar in nature to that of our War II has been revived, this time targeted proclaimed enemy’s regime. against our President and our commitment Fifth: The U.S. is the Enemy. Anti- to the liberation of Iraq. war activists claim the present Bush Let us examine, in this historical context, administration, not Iraq or any other foreign the isolationist arguments, power harms the interests of the American which we hear repeated time people, as well as that of all peoples around and time again in op-eds, press the world. As the International ANSWER The isolationism that conferences, and protest group that runs the peace marches, was employed to statements. proclaimed: “the real threat of nuclear war There is a common set of and the use of Weapons of Mass Destruction undermine American arguments, echoed over and over. arises within the U.S. administration.” The will and self-confidence First and foremost: “No administration’s goal is described as a simple in fighting the fascist Blood for Oil.” The implication one, to “conquer the oil, land and resources and militarist is that the United States acts at of the Middle East.” The result will be a the behest of its largest “catastrophe,” a “war of aggression” in which aggressors in World War corporations, in this case, the social programs will end, as government II has been revived, this ever-greedy oil lobby. We were funds are exclusively used in the attempt to time targeted against told that access to Iraqi oil fields “take control of and profit from the oil of our President and our alone motivated U.S. policy. the Persian/Arabian Gulf.” Our critics said American boys Sixth: America approached a new commitment to the were going to be sacrificed for Quagmire. The enemies of liberation in liberation of Iraq. wealthy business interests. Iraq, speaking from U.S. soil, warned that Second: Our Enemies are rather than victory, the U.S. would once Victims. The opponents of again be blindly sucked into a useless and intervention said that people unwinnable war turning the rest of the whose identity, livelihood and well-being world against our nation. The U.S., as Pat have been harmed by precipitous American Buchanan so plainly put it, is acting in a action, including no-fly zones and an “triumphalist” fashion leading to “an imperial embargo on trade, will now face suffering war on Iraq.” And, of course, Buchanan in the hundreds of thousands, including argued that the U.S. is fundamentally scores of civilian deaths as a result of both manipulated by the Israeli government, the strategic bombing of Iraq and armed which hopes that war with Iraq will give invasion. They declared that nothing that Israel an excuse to return to Lebanon and Saddam Hussein has done compares to the “settle scores with Hizbollah.” The Jews, evil that will be inflicted on the people of now as in the past, are projected as the the Middle East as a result of U.S. military driving force pushing the U.S. to accept their action. agenda and endanger the peace of the world. Third: The Hegemonic U.S. Empire These themes are all reminiscent of Expands. Our opponents claim a drift to those offered in the years before the outbreak war is a result of the mechanism of the of World War II, when home-grown American Empire – acting to thwart the isolationists in protest movements and efforts of competing powers to dominate the pressure groups, backed by a hardy group trade and investment patterns of the world. of supporters in Congress, argued that a 2 sound American policy was one that put their “media cheerleaders” William Kristol, The Foundation for the “America First.” This gave the name to the Charles Krauthammer and Martin Peretz Defense of Democracies most wide ranging and representative have become the “primary intellectual American isolationist group. Indeed, Pat architects” of war against Saddam Hussein. Buchanan’s demagogy about Israeli On both Left and Right, therefore, we influence calls to mind Charles Lindbergh’s see a new conspiracy theory emerging—one 1941 accusation that the drive to enter the that shows the mindset of classical anti- war against Hitler emanated from “the British, Semitism; ie, as Lieber puts it, “a small, all- the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration.” powerful but little known group or ‘cabal’ of Jewish interventionists (neo-conservatives, Jewish masterminds is secretly manipulating Buchanan now says) were powerful, according policy.” Under their influence, the nation has to Lindbergh, because of their “large supposedly shifted away from a policy based ownership and influence in our motion on protecting the people’s interests to one pictures, our press, our radio, and our that is subversive of that government.” interest—and that benefits In a fashion strikingly similar to primarily the right-wing Zionist Today, Old Right Buchanan, the former conservative, now leadership of the Likud in Israel. descendants and left-wing writer Michael Lind, has come out A striking parallel between with his own virtually anti-Semitic conspiracy today and the 1930’s is the imitators gather around theory seeking to explain what lay behind blending together of opposition Pat Buchanan and his the war against Saddam Hussein. He sees to a forceful American foreign journal, The American policy being made by “neoconservative defense policy by remnants of both the Conservative, which intellectuals” who are “products of the Old and New Left and the Old influential Jewish-American sector of the Right. Early in the Cold War, joins the Left in the fight Trotskyist movement…which morphed Harry S. Truman advisor Joseph against so-called U.S. into a kind of militaristic and imperial P. J ones wrote that “most of the “global hegemony.” right.” According to Lind, they support outright opposition” to Truman’s “preventive warfare,” which he argues is new bi-partisan interventionist based on “Trotsky’s theory of the permanent foreign policy came from “the revolution mingled with the far-right Likud extreme Left and the extreme Right…from strain of Zioninsm.” They are the center, a certain group of ‘liberals’ who had been long he argues, of a “metaphorical ‘pentagon’ of strongly critical of the administration’s the Israel lobby and the religious right, stiffening policy toward the Soviet Union, plus conservative think tanks, foundations and from the ‘isolationists,’ who had been and media empires.” It is a virtual new consistent opponents of all foreign-policy neoconservative conspiracy theory, which as measures that projected the United States political scientist Robert J. Lieber writes, is actively into World Affairs.” a “sinister mythology…worthy of the Iraqi Some fifty years later, opposition to a Information Minister, Muhammed Saeed forceful U.S. response to new international Al-Sahaf, who became notorious for telling threats, comes from the same pair of elements. Western journalists not to believe their own Once again, Left and Right stand on common eyes as American tanks rolled into view just ground, active in what some have called “the across the Tigris River.” Red-Brown coalition”—after the creation in In an analysis similar to that made by post-Soviet Russia of an alliance of extreme Lind, the left-wing journalist Eric Alterman, nationalists with old Communists. Today, writing in The Nation, has stressed that “the Old Right descendants and imitators gather war has put Jews in the showcase as never around Pat Buchanan and his journal, The before;” and like Lind, he asserts that a cabal American Conservative, which joins the Left of Jews, including Paul Wolfowitz, Richard in the fight against so-called U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Isolationism & Appeasement in Australia E. M. Andrews
    > Isolationism & Appeasement ü w* in Australia C /3 Reactions to the European Grises, 1935-1939 ‘They tell me things are not too good in Europe, Dave.’ ‘What’s wrong? Drought?’ ‘Unk’ White, Bulletin, 26 July 1939 E. M. Andrews Australian foreign policy in the late 1930s has till now been a neglected topic in historical writing. In this book the author examines Australian reactions to the aggressions which led to World War II — Abyssinia, Spain, Austria, Czecho­ slovakia, and Poland. He describes the early support in Britain and Australia for the League of Nations, and goes on to discuss the causes of the change to a policy of appeasement, culminating in the Munich crisis of 1938, and Australian reactions to that crisis. Additionally, he compares Australian foreign policy at that time and in the sixties, when Australia again supports a powerful ally, this time in Vietnam. To those who lived through the crises of the thirties and now wish to see those years in perspective, as well as to readers of a younger generation, who seek the causes for the development of present-day attitudes to Australian foreign policy, this book will make absorbing reading. For teachers and students of the history of the period it will provide a welcome insight into the reactions of Australian politicians and people to the European crises and to Britain’s part in them. Price in Australia $6.95 This book was published by ANU Press between 1965–1991. This republication is part of the digitisation project being carried out by Scholarly Information Services/Library and ANU Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolationism and the Soviet Public Discourse in the 1920S and Early
    NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH TITLE: ISOLATIONISM AND SOVIET PUBLIC DISCOURSE, In The 1920s And Early 1930s AUTHOR: Jeffrey Brooks CONTRACTOR: University of Minnesota PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Jeffrey Brooks COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER: 802-11 DATE: May 1990 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research- The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Contract No. 802-11) ISOLATIONISM AND SOVIET PUBLIC DISCOURSE In the 1920s and early 1930s by Jeffrey Brooks This is a study of the portrayal of public attitudes toward foreigners and foreign states in the Soviet press during the 1920s and early 193 0s, with a special emphasis on America. As Soviet society took shape, a new language of public life arose; existing traditions were jettisoned or amended, and new notions embraced or discarded- Daily life took on new meanings, and a repertoire of frameworks for understanding Soviet experience and its potential unfolded. Within these frameworks, representation of relations with other states and peoples was critical. Isolationism and xenophobia became hallmarks of the Stalinist system, and without them much of what happened would have been impossible, but the long story of Soviet history reveals a counterpoint. The xenophobia of the Stalin years faded quickly after 1953, first into ambivalence and then into a widely felt desire to participate fully in world systems and interact with other peoples. Xenophobia and much else once deemed immutably Soviet have now been marginalized, and yet something of the earlier experience remains.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 3 Study Guide Name: Date: 1. in 1900 the United States Declared An
    Unit 3 Study Guide Name: Date: 1. In 1900 the United States declared an Open 3. Which of the following is the most accurate Door Policy that reflected which of the following example of President Taft's policy of “dollar beliefs? diplomacy”? A. The Chinese were secretly negotiating trade A. allowing for the nationalization of Latin privileges with European countries. American property owned by U.S. citizens B. Japan might conquer China and cut off all B. exerting economic influence rather than foreign trade. military force in Latin American countries C. All countries should have equal trading rights C. using international trade organizations to in China. stabilize Latin American economies D. American consumers would be hurt by D. maintaining a military force to discourage international trade. European colonization in Latin America 4. How did the United States help the Allies win 2. The United States' policy of acting as an World War I? international police force in the Western Hemisphere can be traced back to the early 1900s and the— A. The United States entered into a secret agreement with the Central Powers. A. Marshall Plan. B. The United States agreed to provide financial assistance to rebuild Germany. B. Roosevelt Corollary. C. The United States refused to fight an offensive C. Open Door Notes. war. D. Dawes Plan. D. The United States provided strong, energized troops. page 1 5. “Remember the Maine” is a memorable slogan 7. This graphic organizer represents U.S. involvement and rallying cry in American history. The slogan in the First World War. symbolizes the onset of which of the following wars? A.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy of Peace: the Cold War, the International Peace Movement, and the Soviet Peace Campaign, 1946-1956
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Conspiracy of Peace: The Cold War, the International Peace Movement, and the Soviet Peace Campaign, 1946-1956 Vladimir Dobrenko A thesis submitted to the Department of International History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, October 2015 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 90,957 words. Statement of conjoint work I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by John Clifton of www.proofreading247.co.uk/ I have followed the Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition, for referencing. 2 Abstract This thesis deals with the Soviet Union’s Peace Campaign during the first decade of the Cold War as it sought to establish the Iron Curtain. The thesis focuses on the primary institutions engaged in the Peace Campaign: the World Peace Council and the Soviet Peace Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • AM IDEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS of the SENATE WARTIME ADDRESSES of ROBERT MARION LA FOLLETTE Harry R. Gianneschi a Dissertation Submitte
    AM IDEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SENATE WARTIME ADDRESSES OF ROBERT MARION LA FOLLETTE Harry R. Gianneschi A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December . 197.5 618206 Vu.w ii Wo • ABSTRACT Robert Marion La Follette, leading American progres­ sive, Governor of Wisconsin for three terms, and U. S. Senator from 1905 to 1925, was selected by the 1957 Senate as one of five of its greatest members throughout this country’s history. In light of Ij.s subsequent praiseworthy reputation and of the popular support he maintained during most of his career, the reason for his publicly denounced "anti-war" stance in 1917 has remained a mystery to many critics. Viewing the stance as a break-away from his previous beliefs, historians have tagged him as pacifistic, ignorant, or demagogic in his approach to the war. This study was designed to investigate elements in La Follette's life and speaking which could clarify the motivation for his Senate speeches from April 4 to October 6 in 1917. Research on this topic was devoted to an in-depth investigation of La Follette's entire speaking career. Texts of the speeches he gave during his life, editorial writings presented in La Follette's Magazine, and the personal papers of La Follette, members of his family, and close friends, all located in the Wisconsin State Histori­ cal Society Archives, were studied. Reactions were discovered in accounts by his contemporaries and the newspapers of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolationism and the Road to World War II
    AP U.S. History: Unit 13.1 HistorySage.com Isolationism and the Road to World War II I. Peace attempts in the 1920s and the Great Depression Use space below for A. Treaty of Versailles punished Germany severely notes 1. League of Nations sought collective security but without support from the US, USSR and Germany, the League was crippled. 2. U.S. Senate refused to adhere to the World Court, the League's judicial arm. 3. Effectiveness of League of Nations a. Helped settle disputes between small powers b. Less successful when major powers involved -- Ultimately did not stop Japanese, Italian, or German aggression. B. Washington Disarmament Conference -- 1921-1922 1. Sought to reduce naval arms race between U.S., Japan & Britain and resolve disputes in the Pacific. 2. Five Power Treaty (5-5-3 battleship ratio) and other agreements lacked enforcement provisions. 3. U.S. naively gave Japan the advantage in the Pacific. 4. Open Door in China preserved. C. Locarno Pact (1926) 1. Western Europe guaranteed existing borders and sought peaceful solutions. 2. Germany promoted peaceful settlement of disputes with neighbors in Eastern Europe--Poland & Czechoslovakia 3. Many Europeans believed "spirit of Locarno" meant no future war in Europe. D. Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928) -- (Pact of Paris) 1. Ratified by 62 nations: made war illegal except for defensive purposes. 2. Major flaws: No enforcement mechanism; aggressors could use "defensive purposes" argument when attacking. 3. Gave Americans a false sense of security in the 1930s. E. War debts and reparations 1. US the largest creditor nation after WWI; Allies owed US $16 billion 2.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL PHOTOGRAPHS File Subject Index
    GENERAL PHOTOGRAPHS File Subject Index A (General) Abeokuta: the Alake of Abram, Morris B.: see A (General) Abruzzi: Duke of Absher, Franklin Roosevelt: see A (General) Adams, C.E.: see A (General) Adams, Charles, Dr. D.F., C.E., Laura Franklin Delano, Gladys, Dorothy Adams, Fred: see A (General) Adams, Frederick B. and Mrs. (Eilen W. Delano) Adams, Frederick B., Jr. Adams, William Adult Education Program Advertisements, Sears: see A (General) Advertising: Exhibits re: bill (1944) against false advertising Advertising: Seagram Distilleries Corporation Agresta, Fred Jr.: see A (General) Agriculture Agriculture: Cotton Production: Mexican Cotton Pickers Agriculture: Department of (photos by) Agriculture: Department of: Weather Bureau Agriculture: Dutchess County Agriculture: Farm Training Program Agriculture: Guayule Cultivation Agriculture: Holmes Foundry Company- Farm Plan, 1933 Agriculture: Land Sale Agriculture: Pig Slaughter Agriculture: Soil Conservation Agriculture: Surplus Commodities (Consumers' Guide) Aircraft (2) Aircraft, 1907- 1914 (2) Aircraft: Presidential Aircraft: World War II: see World War II: Aircraft Airmail Akihito, Crown Prince of Japan: Visit to Hyde Park, NY Akin, David Akiyama, Kunia: see A (General) Alabama Alaska Alaska, Matanuska Valley Albemarle Island Albert, Medora: see A (General) Albright, Catherine Isabelle: see A (General) Albright, Edward (Minister to Finland) Albright, Ethel Marie: see A (General) Albright, Joe Emma: see A (General) Alcantara, Heitormelo: see A (General) Alderson, Wrae: see A (General) Aldine, Charles: see A (General) Aldrich, Richard and Mrs. Margaret Chanler Alexander (son of Charles and Belva Alexander): see A (General) Alexander, John H. Alexitch, Vladimir Joseph Alford, Bradford: see A (General) Allen, Mrs. Idella: see A (General) 2 Allen, Mrs. Mary E.: see A (General) Allen, R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. History Item Release, Spring 2017
    Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program TCAP TNReady—U.S. History Item Release Spring 2017 ® Developed by ETS (Educational Testing Service). Published under contract with the Tennessee Department of Education by Questar Assessment Inc., 5550 Upper 147th Street West, Minneapolis, MN 55124. Copyright © 2017 by Tennessee Department of Education. No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced, or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior express written consent of the Tennessee Department of Education and Questar Assessment Inc. Nextera® is a registered trademark of Questar Assessment Inc. All trademarks, product names, and logos are the property of their respective owners. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Metadata Interpretation Guide – Social Studies ........................................................... 4 U.S. History .................................................................................................................. 5 SPRING 2017 TCAP TNReady Item Release 3 Metadata Interpretation Guide – Social Studies Item Code: Unique letter/number code Passage Title: (if listed): Title of used to identify the item. the passage(s) associated with this item. Standard Code: Primary educational Passage Code: (if listed): Unique standard assessed. letter/number code used to identify the passage(s) that go with this item. Standard Text: Text of the educational standard assessed. Reporting Category: Text of the Reporting Category the standard assesses. Correct Answer: Correct answer. This DOK Level (if listed): Depth of may be blank for constructed response Knowledge (cognitive complexity) is items where students write or type their measured on a three-point scale. 1= responses. Recall or simple reproduction of information; 2= Skills and concepts: comprehension and processing of text; 3= Strategic thinking, prediction, elaboration 4 SPRING 2017 TCAP TNReady Item Release U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Roots of Isolationism and Internationalism in American Foreign Policy Lane Crothers*
    Journal of Transatlantic Studies Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2011, 21Á34 The cultural roots of isolationism and internationalism in American foreign policy Lane Crothers* Department of Politics and Government, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA This article examines the question: why have Americans supported both internationalist and isolationist foreign policies at various points in history? It argues that part of the answer to this question can be found in the structure and nature of American political culture. American political culture frames the terms in which the programmes and plans debated by political leaders ‘make sense’ to the ordinary people whose consent is fundamental to the making of a democratic foreign policy. The article offers an account of the central components of American political culture that are shown to frame four core cultural orientations towards foreign affairs: Liberal Internationalism, America-as-Model, Nativism and Triumphalism. Two dimensions, Liberal Internationalism and America-as- Model, are illustrated through a discussion of contemporary arguments in favour of and opposed to the 1848 MexicanÁAmerican War. The article then offers suggestions of how the four categories of American foreign policy orientations can be applied in cases beyond the MexicanÁAmerican conflict. Both isolationism and internationalism are shown to be core components of American political culture. They are, as a consequence, eternal features of American foreign policy. Keywords: isolationism; internationalism; American political culture; MexicanÁ American War Introduction This article examines the question: why have Americans supported both inter- nationalist and isolationist foreign policies at various points in history? Why do they agree to send their troops to war (or not), to allow their money to be used to subsidise foreign nations (or not), or to intervene as foreign peoples face immeasurable suffering (or not)? Part of the answer to this question can be found in the structure and nature of American political culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program TCAP
    Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program TCAP TNReady— Item Release US History This page intentionally left blank. Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program TCAP TNReady—U.S. History Item Release Spring 2018 ® Developed by ETS (Educational Testing Service). Published under contract with the Tennessee Department of Education by Questar Assessment Inc., 5550 Upper 147th Street West, Minneapolis, MN 55124. Copyright © 2018 by Tennessee Department of Education. No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced, or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior express written consent of the Tennessee Department of Education and Questar Assessment Inc. Nextera® is a registered trademark of Questar Assessment Inc. All trademarks, product names, and logos are the property of their respective owners. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Metadata Interpretation Guide – Social Studies ........................................................... 4 U.S. History .................................................................................................................. 5 SPRING 2018 TCAP TNReady Item Release 3 Metadata Interpretation Guide – Social Studies Item Code: Unique letter/number code Passage Title: (if listed): Title of used to identify the item. the passage(s) associated with this item. Standard Code: Primary educational Passage Code: (if listed): Unique standard assessed. letter/number code used to identify the passage(s) that go with this item. Standard Text: Text of
    [Show full text]
  • USAFA Harmon Memorial Lecture #6 “Mr. Roosevelt's Three Wars: FDR As War Leader” Maurice Matloff, 1964 It Is a Privilege To
    'The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Air Force, Department of Defense or the US Government.'" USAFA Harmon Memorial Lecture #6 “Mr. Roosevelt's Three Wars: FDR as War Leader” Maurice Matloff, 1964 It is a privilege to be invited to the Academy, to participate in the distinguished Harmon Lecture series, and to address the members of the Cadet Wing and their guests from Colorado College. This occasion is particularly pleasurable since it brings back memories of my own introduction to the field of military history during my service in World War II- as a historian on the staff of the Fourth Air Force Headquarters. The early interest of your service in military history has now become a tradition fittingly carried on here in the Academy and in this series, which bears your founder's name. I welcome the opportunity to speak to you this morning on the important subject that your Department of History has selected-one that has long interested me, that has affected all our lives, and that has bearing on your future careers.' Let me begin by going back to March 1, 1945, when a weary President, too tired to carry the ten pounds of steel that braced his paralyzed legs, sat down before the United States Congress to report on the Yalta Conference-the summit meeting in the Crimea with Marshal Stalin and Prime Minister Churchill-from which he had just returned. "I come from the Crimea Conference," he said, "with a firm belief that we have made a good start on the road to a world of peace… "This time we are not making the mistake of waiting until the end of the war to set up the machinery of peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Relocating the American Dream. the America of the 1960S As Portrayed
    Relocating the American Dream The America of the 1960s as Portrayed by the New Journalists Norman Mailer, Hunter S. Thompson, and Tom Wolfe Master's Thesis Department of English University of Helsinki Supervisor: Bo Pettersson Date: 25.3.2009 Meri Laitinen 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................3 1.1 Aims and methods ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Defining new journalism............................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.1 Norman Mailer ........................................................................................................................................ 16 1.2.2 Hunter S. Thompson................................................................................................................................17 1.2.3 Tom Wolfe............................................................................................................................................... 18 1.3 Defining the American Dream...................................................................................................................... 19 1.3.1 Origins of the term................................................................................................................................... 19 1.3.2 The American Dream in popular culture ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]