DOCSLIB.ORG

UCF Senior Design II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UCF Senior Design II UCF Senior Design II Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science & Center for Research and Education in Optics and Lasers University of Central Florida Directed High Frequency, Open-air Communication Group 29 Sandy Cline Photonics [email protected] Ryan Heitz Computer Engineering [email protected] Shane Zweibach Computer Engineering [email protected] Brian Ascencio Electrical Engineering [email protected] i This page is intentionally left blank ii Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................. 3 2.1 MOTIVATION ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 REQUIREMENT SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................... 5 2.4 HOUSE OF QUALITY ................................................................................................... 5 2.5 USERS......................................................................................................................... 7 3.0 RESEARCH ..................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Existing Products ....................................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 NASA Laser Communication ............................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Light Fidelity (Li-Fi) .............................................................................................. 9 3.1.3 RONJA ............................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Microcontroller ....................................................................................................... 12 3.2.1 Microcontroller considerations ........................................................................ 12 3.2.2 Microcontroller comparisons ........................................................................... 17 3.3 Complex Single Board Computers ........................................................................... 19 3.3.1 Raspberry PI ...................................................................................................... 19 3.4 Market Analysis ....................................................................................................... 21 3.5 Relevant Technology ............................................................................................... 23 3.5.1 Storage .............................................................................................................. 23 3.5.2 SD Cards: a viable alternative? ......................................................................... 24 3.6 Developmental Tools .............................................................................................. 26 3.6.1 Integrated Development Environment (IDE) .................................................... 26 3.6.2 Soldering Iron ................................................................................................... 28 3.6.3 Oscilloscopes .................................................................................................... 28 3.6.4 Function generators ......................................................................................... 28 3.6.5 Cymometer ....................................................................................................... 28 3.6.6 Multimeters ...................................................................................................... 29 3.7 Serial Communication Technologies ....................................................................... 29 3.7.1 SPI ..................................................................................................................... 29 3.7.2 I2C ...................................................................................................................... 30 3.7.3 UART ................................................................................................................. 31 iii 3.8 Photosensor selection ............................................................................................. 32 3.8.1 p-n junction photodiode ................................................................................... 32 3.8.2 p-i-n photodiode ............................................................................................... 33 3.8.3 Avalanche Photodiode (APD) ........................................................................... 33 3.8.4 Schottky junction photodetector ..................................................................... 34 3.8.5 Phototransistor ................................................................................................. 35 3.8.6 Sensor selection ................................................................................................ 35 3.9 Light source selection .............................................................................................. 37 3.9.1 LED .................................................................................................................... 37 3.9.2 Fabry-Perot semiconductor laser diode ........................................................... 39 3.9.3 VCSEL ................................................................................................................ 42 3.9.4 Quantum Cascade Laser (QCL) ......................................................................... 43 3.9.5 DFB and DBR lasers ........................................................................................... 44 3.9.6 ECDL .................................................................................................................. 45 3.9.7 Gas lasers & Chemical lasers ............................................................................ 45 3.9.8 Laser diode selection ........................................................................................ 45 3.9.8 Considerations for optical components ............................................................... 46 3.9.9 Simulation & Modeling ........................................................................................ 47 3.10 Bluetooth Connectivity ......................................................................................... 47 3.11 File System Types .................................................................................................. 48 3.11.1 FAT32 .............................................................................................................. 48 3.11.2 NTFS ................................................................................................................ 49 3.11.3 exFAT .............................................................................................................. 49 3.12 Project Management Software ............................................................................. 50 3.12.1 Beyond Compare ............................................................................................ 50 3.12.2 GitHub ............................................................................................................. 50 3.12.3 Slack ................................................................................................................ 51 3.12.4 GroupMe......................................................................................................... 51 3.13 Microcontroller Choice ......................................................................................... 52 4.0 RELATED STANDARDS & DESIGN CONSTRAINTS ........................................................ 53 4.1 RELATED STANDARDS .............................................................................................. 53 4.1.1 RoHS Standards ................................................................................................ 53 4.1.2 Coding Standards .............................................................................................. 54 iv 4.1.3 Soldering Safety ................................................................................................ 56 4.1.4 Open Systems Interconnection model (OSI) .................................................... 57 4.1.5 Ethernet technologies ...................................................................................... 58 4.1.6 TCP/IP Protocol Suite and UDP ......................................................................... 59 4.1.7 Line Coding for 10BASE-T and USB 2.0 ............................................................. 60 4.1.8 ANSI Z 136 ......................................................................................................... 61 4.2 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS ............................................................................................. 62 4.2.1 TIME CONSTRAINTS .......................................................................................... 62 4.2.2 ECONOMIC CONSTRAINTS ................................................................................ 63 4.2.3 SAFETY CONSTRAINTS ...................................................................................... 63 4.2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Free Space Optical Communication for Assorted Domains with Sensitivities
    International Journal of Computing and Corporate Research ISSN (Online) : 2249-054X Volume 6 Issue 5 September 2016 International Manuscript ID : 2249054XV6I5092016-11 FREE SPACE OPTICAL COMMUNICATION FOR ASSORTED DOMAINS WITH SENSITIVITIES Priyanka Assistant Professor, EE Department YMCA University of Science and Technology Faridabad, Haryana, India ABSTRACT data for telecommunications or computer Free-space optical communication (FSO) is networking. "Free space" means air, outer space, an optical communication technology that makes vacuum, or something similar. This contrasts with use of the light propagating in free space for the using solids such as optical fiber cable or an optical transmission of data in wireless mode transmission line. The technology is useful where for telecommunications or computer networking. the physical connections are impractical due to Free space means air, outer space, vacuum, or high costs or other considerations. Free-space something similar. This contrasts with using solids point-to-point optical links can be implemented such as optical fiber cable or an using infrared laser light, although low-data-rate optical transmission line. The technology is useful communication over short distances is possible where the physical connections are impractical due using LEDs. Infrared Data Association (IrDA) to high costs or other considerations. This technology is a very simple form of free-space manuscript underlines the assorted case optical communications [2]. On the applications and implementation perspectives of communications side the FSO technology is free space optical communications. considered as a part of the Optical Wireless Communications applications. Free-space optics Keywords – Free Space Optical Communication, can be used for communications FSO, Wireless Mode, Optical Communication between spacecraft [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Ronja Optical Datalink
    RONJA Optical datalink ● 1998: Experiments with IR 115.2kBaud ● 2004: – 10Mbps – Full duplex – 1.4km range ● User Controlled Technology (UCT) Prehistory: Heliograph ● 405 B.C. Ancient Greeks ● 1910 ● -1960 Aldis Lamp th ● Late 19 century – 1997 ● Naval radio silence, early ATC Simple encoding ● ½ sec. Light, ½ sec. Dark -> logical 0 ● ½ sec. Dark, ½ sec. Light -> logical 1 ● Speed up 10,000x : 10Base ethernet Transmitter ● LED + 13cm lens, 17mW of light ● Unconditionally eye safe ● 10MBaud, 100% depth ● 14' divergence ● 4m spot @ 1km Advantages ● No interference ● No spectrum regulation ● No electrosmog ● Difficult eavesdropping ● Smooth throughput ● Full duplex -9 ● BER 10 Disadvantages ● Dropouts on fog ● Mount requirements ● PtP topology only ● Range limited by extinction ● Mechanics: 10-20kg Range ● Rain OK ● Visibility = 17dB attenuation of light ● Divergence 4mrad FWHM ● 1.4km range @4km visibility ● Stable, given by white noise from Sun Ronja + WiFi backup ● Reliability ● Throughput ● Special SW requirements – Immediate dropout detection Mechanical mounting ● Holder with fine and rough alignment ● 5 types of console – Chimney – Parallel – Perpendicular – Mast – Corner Manufacture ● DIY ● PCB in a factory ● Manual population ● Drilling, cutting, painting etc. ● Various operations can be ordered Installations ● 96 registered installations ● 54 km total length ● 9 countries Nearest Installation Lausanne 300m, since 2003 Installatios by country 96 total Czech Slovakia Romania Czech 70 Hungary Poland 1 Switzerland LSaptvaiian 1 CBroaazitil a1 1 Russia SRwuistzseiar l1and 1 Hungary 2 Brazil Romania 4 Croatia Spain Slovakia 11 Latvia Poland Top 4 cities Cities with largest installation counts Prague, CZ Prague, CZ 29 Pardubice, CZ Bratislava, SK Buzau, RO Buzau, RO 4 Bratislava, SK 5 Pardubice, CZ 18 BRL-CAD ● Devel since 1979 by U.
    [Show full text]
  • Audio Transmission Through Visible Light Communication System : Design Considerations and Performance Evaluations
    Published by : International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) http://www.ijert.org ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 5 Issue 08, August-2016 Audio Transmission Through Visible Light Communication System : Design Considerations and Performance Evaluations Mariyam Thomas Binu Mathew Department of E.C.E Department of E.C.E Amal Jyothi College of Engineering Amal Jyothi College of Engineering Kanjirappally, Kottayam, Kerala Kanjirappally, Kottayam, Kerala Abstract— As the radio spectrum is already crowded, there is a need for new medium for faster and more secure wireless communication. To address this problem, a new communication technology called Visible Light Communication (VLC) is introduced. VLC system to transmit an audio signal is presented in this paper. Performance of visible light communication system is tested and analyzed. Besides that, influence of additional amplifier at the receiver on the system is characterized. Results show that the performance of the system is increased by adding the amplifier circuit. Also, the distance between transmitter and receiver can influence the system performance. For longer distances, performance is poor and loss is more. As a conclusion, a visible light communication system for audio transmission is demonstrated and a maximum range of 50 cm is achieved for this system. Fig. 1. Visible light as a part of electromagnetic spectrum Keywords—Radio Spectrum; Wireless Communcation; Visible The basic idea of VLC system is to add information into Light Communication; Amplifier the light source and at the receiver side, the light intensity changes detected using a photo detector. This is called I. INTRODUCTION intensity modulated communication and the modulation Communication has a vital role in the field of electronics frequency used is much higher than that the human eye can and communication.
    [Show full text]
  • FPGA Based Visible Light Communication
    ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765 ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875 International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering (A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal) Website: www.ijareeie.com Vol. 9, Issue 3, March 2020 FPGA based Visible Light Communication Santhosh Kumar.A1, Vignesh.E1, Vishnu Hara Sudan.J1, Yogesh.K1, Mr. S.Senthilmurugan2 B.E. Electronics and Communication Engineering, Department of ECE, SRM Valliammai Engineering College, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chennai, India1 Assistant Professor, Department of ECE, SRM Valliammai Engineering College, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chennai, India2 ABSTRACT: The users’ location in visible light positioning systems generally rely on three features of the received signals: time of arrival (TOA), angle of arrival (AOA), and received signal strength (RSS). RSS based techniques use the intensity of the signal to estimate the distance from the transmitter to the receiver. These techniques have the potential to achieve a high accuracy in visible light positioning systems because of the strong line of sight (LOS) signals, which are often not available in RF systems. VLC is the way of communication using light which is visible to human eye. Here communication is achieved with the help of LEDs. We modulate the light at a very high speed such that the modulation is not visible to human eye by switching the LEDs on and off rapidly on the transmitter side. Like, photodiode is used on the receiver side to detect the modulation. Light Fidelity or Li-Fi is communication through light at a very high speed. It is based on Visual Light Communication system. Speed of Li-fi is about 224Gbps.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Space Optical Communication
    A SEMINAR REPORT ON Free Space optic Submitted in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY Affiliated to RTU, Kota IN ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING Session: 2009 -10 SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY: H.O.D. (Electronics & Comm..) (VIII Sem.) ECE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGG. P REFACE Technology has rapidly grown in past two-three decades. An engineer without practical knowledge and skills cannot survive in this technical era. Theoretical knowledge does matter but it is the practical knowledge that is the difference between the best and the better. Organizations also prefer experienced engineers than fresher ones due to practical knowledge and industrial exposure of the former. So it can be said the industrial exposure has to be very much mandatory for engineers nowadays. The practical training is highly conductive for solid foundation for: Solid foundation of knowledge and personality. Exposure to industrial environment. Confidence building. Enhancement of creativity A CKNOWLEDGEMENT I express my sincere thanks to my seminar guide Prof. R.L.Dua (Electronics Department) for guiding me right from the inception till the successful completion of the seminar . I sincerely acknowledge him for extending their valuable guidance , support for literature , critical reviews of seminar and the report and above all the oral support he had provide to me with all stages of this seminar. C ONTENT • Introduction • History • Theory • Optical Communication • Free Space Optical Communication • Optical fiber communication • How FSO Works???? • Benefits of FSO • Comparison with FSO • Optical Access Communication • Challenges • Usage and technologies • Applications • Advantages • Conclusion I NTRODUCTION Free space optics (FSO) is an optical communication technology that uses light propagating in free space to transmit data between two points.The technology is useful where the physical connections by the means of fibre optic cable are impractical due to high costs or other considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Models of Connectivity: Reclaiming Networked Spaces
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 6-1-2015 Alternative Models of Connectivity: Reclaiming Networked Spaces Philip M. Bain University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons, and the Digital Communications and Networking Commons Recommended Citation Bain, Philip M., "Alternative Models of Connectivity: Reclaiming Networked Spaces" (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 47. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/47 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF CONNECTIVITY: RECLAIMING NETWORKED SPACES __________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Arts and Humanities University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts __________ by Philip M. Bain June 2015 Advisor: Conor McGarrigle © Copyright by Philip M. Bain 2015 All Rights Reserved Author: Philip M. Bain Title: ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF CONNECTIVITY: RECLAIMING NETWORKED SPACES Advisor: Conor McGarrigle Degree Date: June 2015 ABSTRACT Alternative networking is a growing field of study and practice due to advancements in computer networking hardware, and software protocols. Methods of integrating alternative networking configurations into infrastructure present enhanced forms of empowerment and embodiment for participants. Through an analysis of multiple hardware and software examples, this research suggests that practices of sharing and collaboration, which are embedded in the history of computer networking, have the potential to reinvigorate the notion of a virtual public sphere, and support the ideals of digital democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • RONJA and Free Space Optics
    RONJA and Free Space Optics Russell Valentine April 3, 2009 1 Overview RONJA (Reasonable Optical Near Joint Access) Tetrapolis – Allows one to make a free space 10Mbps full-duplex1 Ethernet bridge between two points up to 1.4 km away using visible incoherent light. Plans to build the necessary components to make a Ethernet bridge are located on the RONJA website[1]. This paper will cover how the RONJA works as well as explain certain design observations. As shown in Figure 1, the RONJA Tetrapolis consists of a Receiver (RX) and Trans- mitter (TX) at both sides of the bridge. The transmitter sends a signal with a Light Emitting Diode (LED), the light rays are collimated (paralleled) by a lens. On the other side of the bridge the receiver uses another lens to focus light onto a photo diode. The Twister is the electronics that cleans up the signal, adds a 1Mhz pulse when no data is being communicated, and adds the link integrity pulse back to the Ethernet cable. The 1Mhz pulse is used to keep the RX knowing what a signal is over noise. Figure 1: Overview Diagram 1.1 Uses Possible uses would be to expand a network between buildings without having to dig in the ground and lay cable. Such examples are: a network connection between a home and workshop, between an individual’s home and their friend/families house, to connect two company buildings, to connect university buildings, a temporary point to point network after a disaster, etc. 1Communication in both directions simultaneously, auto-negotiation not supported.
    [Show full text]
  • CHANCEY, MARK ALAN. Short Range Underwater Optical Communication Links
    ABSTRACT CHANCEY, MARK ALAN. Short Range Underwater Optical Communication Links. (Under the direction of Dr. John F. Muth) The future tactical ocean environment will be increasingly complicated. In addition to traditional communication links there will be a proliferation of unmanned vehicles in space, in the air, on the surface, and underwater. To effectively utilize these systems improvements in underwater communication systems are needed. Since radio waves do not propagate in sea water, and acoustic communication systems are relatively low bandwidth the possibility of high speed underwater optical communication systems are considered. In traditional communication systems, constructing a link budget is often relatively straight forward. In the case of underwater optical systems the variations in the optical properties of ocean water lead to interesting problems when considering the feasibility and reliability of underwater optical links. The main focus of this thesis is to understand how to construct an underwater link budget which includes the effects of scattering and absorption of realistic ocean water. The secondary focus of the thesis was to construct LED based optical communication systems. This required understanding the behavior of Gallium Nitride LEDs operated under intense electrical pulsing conditions. An optical FM wireless system was constructed for transmitting speech. An LED based Ethernet compatible digital communications system that was capable of operating at 10 Mbps was also constructed and packaged for underwater operation. SHORT RANGE UNDERWATER OPTICAL COMMUNICATION LINKS By MARK ALAN CHANCEY A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Raleigh, NC 2005 APPROVED BY: ___________________________ __________________________ Professor John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Survey and Issue on Free Space Optical Communication System
    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 4 Issue 02, February-2015 Literature Survey and issue on Free Space Optical Communication System Dinesh Sharma1 S. A. Khan2 Student M.Tech E.C.E, Department of Electronics and Associate Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering Communication Engineering Shiv Shankar Institute of Engineering & Technology Patti Shiv Shankar Institute of Engineering & Technology Patti Tarn Taran, Punjab Tarn Taran, Punjab Sanamdeep Singh3 Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Shiv Shankar Institute of Engineering & Technology Patti Tarn Taran, Punjab Abstract— Present communication era demand a by proper choice of the parameters like modulation communication link with high bandwidth, maximum techniques, wavelength and attenuation coefficient. The FSO performance, minimum errors and good channel capacity. All technology is very useful where the physical connections are these can be well achieved by using free space optical impractical due to high costs or some other considerations. communication system. Because FSO system does not require FSO involves the optical transmission of voice, video and any license for its establishment and the working. Now this paper consists of detailed survey of FSO system, its advantages, data using air as the medium of transmission as opposed to disadvantages and different applications. In FSO system no. of fiber optic cable. Transmission using FSO technology is modulation techniques used to modulate information signal at relatively simple. It involves two systems each consisting of source side like: AM, FM, IM, OOK etc. each FSO system uses an optical transceiver which consists of a laser transmitter a high-power optical transmitter for transmit source signal and a receiver to provide full duplex (bi-directional) towards destination and receiving side high sensitivity receiver capability.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Implementation of a Bi-Directional Visible Light
    DEGREE PROGRAMME IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A BI- DIRECTIONAL VISIBLE LIGHT COMMUNICATION TESTBED Thesis author Pekka Kamsula Thesis supervisor Marcos Katz Thesis advisor Juha-Pekka Mäkelä Approved _______/_______2015 Grade ______________________ Kamsula P. (2015) Desing and implementation of a bi-directional visible light communication testbed. University of Oulu, Department of Electrical and Information Engineering. Master’s Thesis, 59 p. ABSTRACT This work defines a bi-directional visible light communication (VLC) testbed design and implementation process using Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) software defined radios (SDR) and open-source software. The visible light communication design uses LED light sources for wireless communications purposes. The testbed combines light, infrared and radio frequencies as wireless media to be utilized in a hybrid wireless communication system. Bi-directional communication at 12.5 Mbps bit rate was successfully achieved and only limited by a sample rate of the USRP system. The achieved communication distance was in the range of 0.5 to 7 meters depending on the used optics. A TCP-IP communication and access to the Internet was also established by using light and infrared communication links. The Internet connection was also established by using power line communication for providing data to the lighting through the existing power line cables. The results in the work were obtained by using a GMSK modulation. Also, GFSK, QPSK, 8-PSK, 16-QAM and OFDM modulation were initially tested for future study. Key words: Visible light communication, software defined radio, open-source software, testbed implementation, Li-Fi Kamsula P. (2015) Kaksisuuntaisen näkyvän valon tiedonsiirtotestialustan suunnittelu ja toteutus.
    [Show full text]
  • Visible Light Communication
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI TORINO CORSO DI LAUREA MAGISTRALE IN FISICA DELLE TECNOLOGIE AVANZATE VISIBLE LIGHT COMMUNICATION Relatore: Stefano Argirò Co-relatore: Antonio Orlando Candidato: Stefano Truzzi Anno Accademico 2015/2016 Abstract: The need to be always connected to the network and to have access to ever larger volumes of data has led to the improvement of the existing transmission technologies and the creation of new transmission techniques. One of these new techniques is the Visible Light Communication (VLC). It is based on the transmission of light pulses that belong to the visible spectrum. VLC employs a part of the electromagnetic spectrum that is currently unused for transmission purposes, this provides a huge bandwidth (390 THz). This technology is based on LEDs and photodiodes, devices which, although present for decades in the global market, are seeing only recently improved performance and wide spread. These considerations are leading many researchers to approach the VLC. In this work we first made a study to understand what the level of technology has been reached until now. In general the VLC systems could be divided in two macrocategories: the indoor systems and the outdoor systems. Both technologies have different possible applications, in particular the outdoor system can be derived from the indoor system. Furthermore in December 2011 the IEEE (institute of electrical and electronics engineers) completed the standardization of the physical layer. The physical layer is the first layer of the ISO/OSI model. It describes the system physical features like: means of transmission, construction of transmitter and receiver device and what is the modulation used to transmit data.
    [Show full text]
  • Ronja Optical Datalink
    RONJA Optical datalink ● 1998: Experiments with IR 115.2kBaud ● 2004: – 10Mbps – Full duplex – 1.4km range ● User Controlled Technology (UCT) Prehistory: Heliograph ● 405 B.C. Ancient Greeks ● 1910 ● -1960 Aldis Lamp th ● Late 19 century – 1997 ● Naval radio silence, early ATC Simple encoding ● ½ sec. Light, ½ sec. Dark -> logical 0 ● ½ sec. Dark, ½ sec. Light -> logical 1 ● Speed up 10,000x : 10Base ethernet Transmitter ● LED + 13cm lens, 17mW of light ● Unconditionally eye safe ● 10MBaud, 100% depth ● 14' divergence ● 4m spot @ 1km Advantages ● No interference ● No spectrum regulation ● No electrosmog ● Difficult eavesdropping ● Smooth throughput ● Full duplex -9 ● BER 10 Disadvantages ● Dropouts on fog ● Mount requirements ● PtP topology only ● Range limited by extinction ● Mechanics: 10-20kg Range ● Rain OK ● Visibility = 17dB attenuation of light ● Divergence 4mrad FWHM ● 1.4km range @4km visibility ● Stable, given by white noise from Sun Ronja + WiFi backup ● Reliability ● Throughput ● Special SW requirements – Immediate dropout detection Mechanical mounting ● Holder with fine and rough alignment ● 5 types of console – Chimney – Parallel – Perpendicular – Mast – Corner Manufacture ● DIY ● PCB in a factory ● Manual population ● Drilling, cutting, painting etc. ● Various operations can be ordered Installations ● 96 registered installations ● 54 km total length ● 9 countries Nearest Installation Lausanne 300m, since 2003 Installatios by country 96 total Czech Slovakia Romania Czech 70 Hungary Poland 1 Switzerland LSaptvaiian 1 CBroaazitil a1 1 Russia SRwuistzseiar l1and 1 Hungary 2 Brazil Romania 4 Croatia Spain Slovakia 11 Latvia Poland Top 4 cities Cities with largest installation counts Prague, CZ Prague, CZ 29 Pardubice, CZ Bratislava, SK Buzau, RO Buzau, RO 4 Bratislava, SK 5 Pardubice, CZ 18 BRL-CAD ● Devel since 1979 by U.
    [Show full text]