Taung Gold Jeanette Project, Free State Traffic Impact Study

TAUNG GOLD JEANETTE PROJECT, FREE STATE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

APRIL 2016 TAUNG GOLD JEANETTE PROJECT, FREE STATE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SLR Africa (Block 7) Fourways Manor Office Park Cnr. Roos and Macbeth Streets FOURWAYS 2060

Tel. No.: +27 11 467 0945 Fax No.: +27 11 467 0978

Revision 1

Project No.: 19520.R Date: April 2016

WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Green Reef Village Unit 5, Greenworks Street BOKSBURG 1459

Tel. No.: +27 (0) 11 450 2290 www.wspgroup.com www.pbworld.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT

ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3

Remarks

Date 17 March 2016 18 April 2016

Cornelia Hutchinson Prepared by (Pr Eng)

Signature

Checked by Rod Strong (Pr Eng)

Signature

Cornelia Hutchinson Cornelia Hutchinson Authorised by (Pr Eng) (Pr Eng)

Signature

Project Number 19520.R 19520.R

Report Number 19520.R/11 19520.R/11

W:\Deltek W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Projects\19000\19520.R Jeanette Project TIA\11 - - Jeanette Project TIA\11 File Reference Reports\11.1 Other - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\Jeanette Reports\Jeanette Project_Traffic Impact Project_Traffic Impact Study_2016-04-18.docx Study_2016-04-18.docx ii

PRODUCTION TEAM

CLIENT

Project Manager Natasha Smyth

WSP | PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF

Traffic Engineer Cornelia Hutchinson

Reviewer Rod Strong

SUBCONSULTANTS

Trafftrans Frans van Heerden

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (Pty) Ltd Project No. 19520.R April 2016 iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 TRAFFIC SPECIALIST DETAILS ...... 1

1.1 PERSONAL DETAILS ...... 1

1.2 QUALIFICATIONS ...... 1

1.3 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE ...... 1

1.4 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ...... 1

1.5 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ...... 2

2 INTRODUCTION ...... 3

2.1 PURPOSE ...... 3

2.2 DATES AND TIMELINES...... 3

2.3 GUIDELINES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS ...... 3

2.4 SCOPE ...... 3

2.5 METHODOLOGY ...... 3

2.6 LOCALITY ...... 5

3 DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT ...... 6

3.1 EXISTING LAND USE ...... 6

3.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...... 6

3.3 EXISTING ROAD NETWORK ...... 6

4 TRAFFIC DATA ...... 7

4.1 INTERSECTION COUNTS ...... 7

4.2 LINK COUNTS...... 7

5 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION ...... 8

5.1 TRIP GENERATION ...... 8

5.2 WORST-CASE TRAFFIC SCENARIO...... 10

5.3 TRIP ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ...... 11

5.4 TRAFFIC GROWTH ...... 11

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 iv

6 OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT ...... 12

6.1 LEVELS OF SERVICE ...... 12

6.2 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS ...... 12

6.3 SIDRA ANALYSIS RESULTS ...... 12

6.4 MITIGATION MEASURES ...... 13

7 MINE ACCESS ...... 14

7.1 ACCESS SPACING ...... 14

7.2 QUEUE STORAGE LENGTH...... 14

8 ROAD SAFETY ISSUES ...... 15

8.1 SHOULDER SIGHT DISTANCE...... 15

8.2 HEAVY VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENTS ...... 15

8.3 ROAD SURFACE CONDITIONS...... 16

8.4 RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING...... 16

9 ROAD PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT ...... 17

9.1 CURRENT TRAFFIC LOADING...... 17

9.2 ADDITIONAL LOADING ON THE R30...... 17

9.3 ADDITIONAL LOADING ON S86 ...... 19

9.4 SUGGESTED MEASURES ...... 19

10 INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES ...... 20

10.1 ISSUES RAISED BY IAP’S ...... 20

11 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 21

11.1 CONCLUSIONS ...... 21

11.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 21

12 REFERENCES...... 22

13 APPENDICES ...... 23

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 v

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A FIGURES APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX C TRAFFIC DATA APPENDIX D SIDRA RESULTS APPENDIX E NEMA REGULATIONS (2014) CHECKLIST APPENDIX F CURRICULUM VITAE

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 1

1 TRAFFIC SPECIALIST DETAILS

1.1 PERSONAL DETAILS à Ms. Cornelia Hutchinson à ID Number: 8108050032088 à Contact Details: Tel: 082 675 0299 E-mail: [email protected]

1.2 QUALIFICATIONS

Cornelia Hutchinson is a qualified professional civil engineer specialising in Traffic Engineering. She obtained the following degrees at the University of Pretoria:

à B.Eng Civil Engineering (First Class) in 2003; and à B.Eng (Hons.) Transportation Engineering (with distinction) in 2011.

1.3 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE The Traffic Specialist has the following relevant project experience. Her comprehensive Curriculum Vitae is included in Appendix F. à Expansion of Klipfontein Section of Middelburg Mine and associated closure of a section of the D253 Provincial Road, Mpumalanga (2015); à The Cascade Iron Ore Mining Project in Mpumalanga (2014); à Anglo Alexander Coal Mine near Kriel in Mpumalanga (2014); à Butsanani Rietvlei Opencast Coal Mine in Mpumalanga (2014); à Yzermyn Coal Mine near Wakkerstroom in Mpumalanga(2012); à Sintel Char Plant Expansion and Grootegeluk Coal Mine in Lepalale (2011); à New Largo Coal Mine in Mpumalanga (2011); and à Eerstelingsfontein Opencast Coal Mine in Belfast, Mpumalanga (2011) à Professional affiliations: Engineering Council of South Africa (20130451); South African Institute of Civil Engineers (201236); and Institute of Transportation Engineers (1043352)

1.4 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS The Traffic Specialist belongs to the following professional affiliations: à Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA), registration number 20130451; and à South African Institute of Civil Engineers, member number 201236.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 2

1.5 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

I, Cornelia Hutchinson, hereby declare that I am an independent consultant and have no conflict of interest related to the work of this report. Specially, I declare that I have no personal financial connections to the relevant property owners, developers, planners, financiers or consultants of the development. I declare that the opinions expressed in this report are my own and a true reflection of my professional expertise. The views and findings expressed in this report are objective and might therefore not be favourable to the applicant/client.

______Cornelia Hutchinson

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 3

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 PURPOSE

WSP Group Africa (Pty) Ltd was appointed by Synergistics (part of the SLR group) to conduct a Traffic Impact Assessment for the Jeanette Project gold mine just north of Welkom in the Free State. This study was conducted as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment in terms of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (MPRDA, No. 28 of 2002) and the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (NEMA, No. 107 of 1998) required for the Jeanette Project.

2.2 DATES AND TIMELINES

In order to develop the base and horizon year traffic scenarios for the analysis, estimations and assumptions had to be made in terms of the dates and timelines of the various project phases. These were based on the information available at the time of the study. It should however be noted that these dates and timelines are subject to change depending on receipt of legislative approvals and market conditions.

2.3 GUIDELINES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS This Traffic Impact Study was based on the principles and guidelines of the South African Manual for Traffic Impact Studies, Report RR 93/635 of the Department of Transport (1995).

Road safety considerations such as shoulder sight distance and stopping sight distance were evaluated in terms of the Geometric Design of Rural Roads technical guidelines, document TRH17 published by the Department of Transport in 1988.

Recommended road signs and markings should comply with the requirements of the Southern African Development Community Road Traffic Signs Manual, issued by the Department of Transport (1998).

A checklist with the requirements for specialist reports in terms of the new NEMA Regulations(6) (2014) are included in Appendix E, which cross-refence the relevant sections of this report. 2.4 SCOPE

The study covers the following aspects related to traffic:

à A brief description of the proposed development; à Discussion of trip generation, distribution and assignment associated with the proposed mine; à Analysis of traffic operating conditions for the proposed mine; à Comment on traffic and road safety issues; à Comment on on-going road pavement management and maintenance; and à Conclusions and recommendations. 2.5 METHODOLOGY

The Traffic Impact Study was conducted as follows:

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 4

2.5.1 Site Inspection

An inspection of the public road network in the vicinity of the Jeanette Project was conducted by the Traffic Engineer on Wednesday, 17 June 2015. This was considered to be a “normal day” in terms of traffic flows, i.e. outside of public or school holidays. The outcome of the site investigation is not sensitive to the season during which it is conducted.

A visual inspection of the roads and pavement condition of the R30 was conducted and the intersections at which traffic counts were required were identified. The season site investigation is therefore not very significant to the study.

2.5.2 Data Collection

Manual, classified traffic counts were conducted on a typical weekday, Thursday, 23 July 2015 from 06:00 to 18:00 at the three critical intersections identified during the site visit. The geometric layout of the intersections were verified at the same time. Continuous (24-hour/7-day) electronic counts were conducted at two locations along the R30 during July and August 2015.

The traffic patterns of the study area is not expected to be sensitive to seasonal fluctuations (other than school holidays) and the data is therefore considered to be representative of normal traffic conditions.

2.5.3 Baseline Assessment

The collected traffic data was analysed by means of SIDRA 6.1 software in order to determine the baseline traffic conditions.

2.5.4 Trip Generation and Distribution

Based on the information contained in the Pre-Feasibility Study for the Jeanette Project (Minxcon Projects, August 2014), information provided by the client and reasonable assumptions where information was not available, the trip generation during the construction and operational phases of the mine was estimated.

2.5.5 Horizon Year Assessment

The generated trips were added to the counted traffic data and analysed in SIDRA to determine the impact of the Jeanette Project on the traffic operations at the critical intersections. The worst- case traffic horizon year was determined by evaluating the combined impact of the construction and operational trip generation.

2.5.6 Assessment of Road Pavement

Visual inspections of the existing road pavement of the R30 was conducted during the site visit and a photo and video record was compiled for further assessment.

The existing 7-day average light and heavy vehicle traffic volumes along the R30 were obtained by means of electronic counts. The expected heavy vehicle loading by the Jeanette Project on the R30 was estimated and added to the current loading to determine the potential impact of the proposed mine.

2.5.7 Access Requirements

The suitability of the location of the proposed accesses to the mine was evaluated in terms of capacity and safety.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 5

2.5.8 Conclusions and Recommendations

From the visual inspections, SIDRA analysis and assessment as described above, conclusions and recommendations were made in order to mitigate the expected traffic and heavy vehicle impact of the Jeanette Project.

2.6 LOCALITY

The Jeanette Project site is located along the R30 approximately 20 km north-west of Welkom in the Free State. The locality plan (Figure 1) is included herewith in Appendix A.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 6

3 DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT

3.1 EXISTING LAND USE

The historical Jeanette Gold Mine ceased operations in 1955. The existing service infrustructure in the mine area is well established, including roads, railway lines, a water pipeline and powerline, which will be utilised for the proposed project.

The mine area surface is mostly vacant and used for agricultural purposes at the moment.

3.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

The extent of the proposed mining right area is shown in Figure 2 in Appendix A.

The proposed underground gold mine will have an estimated steady production of approximately 1 100 kilograms of gold per month. Steady state production is expected to be reached after 5 to 7 years of shaft sinking, followed by 18 years of steady state production. At the time of the study it was estimated that the first tonnes would be treated through the plant in 2023, i.e. steady state production was estimated to be reached by 2028 at the earliest.

Gold will be processed on site and will be transported by helicopter, since the volumes are small and the gold is a high security-risk commodity. The gold will be flown out of the processing plant to Rand Refineries.

3.3 EXISTING ROAD NETWORK

The proposed mine is situated to the east of the R30 provincial road, which is a 2-lane undivided roadway with a wide surfaced shoulder (±2m) and speed limit of 100km/h. The speed limit is reduced to 80km/h in advance of intersections along the R30. At the time of the site visit (17 June 2015) the surface of the road was observed to be in a good condition. It appeared that the road had recently been resurfaced and the road markings were still new. The sections of the R30 towards Welkom had only been pre-marked at the time. Refer to Photograph 1 in Appendix B.

The mine area is traversed by a gravel road (S86), which will provide access to the mine. The road is more than 7 m wide and adequate for two-way traffic. The posted speed limit on this road is 80km/h (see Photographs 2 and 3 in Appendix B). Mine access will be provided by means of the S86. The proposed location for the access road is shown in Figure 3 in Appendix A. Employees will mostly gain access from the south, via the town of Odendaalsrus, and heavy vehicles will access the mine from the north via the R30.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 7

4 TRAFFIC DATA

4.1 INTERSECTION COUNTS

Manual, classified traffic counts were carried out on Thursday, 23 July 2015 from 06:00 to 18:00 (12-hours) at 6 intersections along the R30 and in Odendaalsrus. The intersections where counts were conducted are shown in Figures 4A and 4B in Appendix A and listed below:

à M2: R30 and Buffalo Road (access road to Allanridge); à M3: R30 and S86 gravel road; à M4: Erleigh Boulevard and Hauptfleisch Street; à M5: R70 and R34 (Findley Avenue); à M6: R30 and Odendaal Street; and à M7: R30 and R34 (Findley Avenue).

The peak hours of these intersections occur between 6:45 and 9:15 (AM peak); and 15:00 and 18:00 (PM peak). The peak hour traffic volumes at each of the critical intersections are shown in Figures 5A to 6B in Appendix A. The comprehensive traffic data is included in Appendix C.

4.2 LINK COUNTS

Electronic 7-day/24-hour link counts were conducted at two locations on the R30 to determine the current traffic volumes and light:heavy vehicle split on this road. The electronic counting stations are indicated on Figures 4A and 4B in Appendix A and are listed below:

à E1: North of the T-junction of the R30 and the S86 gravel road; and à E2: South of the T-junction of the R30 and the R34 (Findley Avenue).

The counts were initially conducted at both stations from Thursday, 23 July to Wednesday, 29 July 2015. Due to technical problems the data at station E1 was not classified during these counts and the counts were repeated at this station from Friday, 31 July to Thursday, 6 August 2015.

The detailed traffic data is included herewith in Appendix C and summarised in Table 3.1 below.

Table 3.1: Seven-day Average Volumes (24-hours)

Vehicle Count Station Northbound Southbound Both Directions Classification Light 1089 1005 2094 E1 Heavy 167 250 417 All 1256 1255 2511 Light 2473 2193 4666 E2 Heavy 364 753 1117 All 2837 2946 5783

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 8

5 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION

5.1 TRIP GENERATION

Trip generation rates for this type of development are not available from standard sources. The trip generation used has been extracted from information provided by the client. This information is subdivided into the construction phase and the operating phase and can be summarised as follows:

5.1.1 Construction Phase

At the time of this study site establishment was expected to begin in 2017 with an estimated duration of ± 9 months. For the purpose of the assessment construction was therefore assumed to commence in the beginning of 2018 and estimated to be completed by 2027. Based on available information at the time of the study, operations were assumed to commence in 2023, which could potentially result in a 4-year overlap between construction and operations.

The approach regarding surface infrastructure will be to erect and commission the permanent infrastructure needed for steady state conditions in the early stages of the project. However, during the initial stages of shaft sinking, use will be made of temporary park homes for site offices, change houses, compressors, workshops and stores whilst the permanent infrastructure is under construction.

The Jeanette Project will include establishment and construction of the following infrastructure on site:

à Sinking of 2 new shafts; à Developing the following surface and underground infrastructure:

< Surface parking;

< Surface office complex and ablution facilities;

< Surface workshop;

< Surface change house;

< Security facility;

< Explosives magazines;

< Lamp room;

< Shaft headgear, bank area & winder housing;

< Surface conveyor system;

< Surface dams;

< Decline development;

< Underground workshop;

< Underground pump stations; and

< Underground conveyor system. à Services – water, electricity, compressed air; à Information Technology infrastructure; à Process plant; à Tailings facility; and Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 9

à Waste rock dump.

5.1.1.1 Employee Trip Generation

An estimated 1 400 employment opportunities will be available during the construction phase. It was assumed that these employees will work between 07:00 and 17:00 and their peak travel time will therefore coincide with the peak hours of the background traffic. The assumed trip generation characteristics of the construction staff is summarised in Table 4.2 below. For a worst-case scenario it was assumed that this maximum staff complement would apply throughout the construction period.

Table 4.2: Construction Staff Peak Hour Trip Generation

Employee Employees Transport Mode Number Vehicle Category % of of PCU’s* % Qty Vehicle Type Occupancy (EC) EC Vehicles Managerial/ Technicians/ 5% 70 Passenger Car 100% 1.5 47 47 Clerical Skilled/semi- Passenger Car 50% 1.5 117 117 25% 350 skilled Minibus Taxi 50% 12 15 15 Unskilled Minibus Taxi 50% 12 41 41 70% 980 labourers Bus 50% 60 9 45 Total 100% 1 400 229 265

* Passenger Car Units: It was assumed that one bus is equavalent to 5 PCU’s.

5.1.1.2 Heavy Vehicle Trip Generation

Information regarding the heavy vehicle trip generation during construction was not available at the time of this study and it was therefore assumed that 10 bi-directional heavy vehicle trips will be generated per day (outside peak hours of the road network) during construction for material delivery and waste collection. It was assumed that the construction plant will remain on site for the construction period, i.e. not having a significant impact on the road pavement.

5.1.2 Operating Phase

Operation is planned to commence in 2023 and steady-state production is expected to be attained 5 to 7 years later, i.e. 2028 to 2030. For security reasons the processed gold will only be transported by helicopter.

5.1.2.1 Employee Trip Generation

The mine will employ an estimated number of 1 113 staff members during peak operations. The mine will operate in three shifts of eight hours each with 320 persons per shift. The shift times will be as follows: à Shift 1: 06:00 to 14:00; à Shift 2: 14:00 to 22:00; and à Shift 3: 22:00 to 06:00. The shift change times and trip generation of Shifts 2 and 3 will not occur at the same time as the peak periods of the background traffic. Employees starting at 06:00 AM will also travel before commencement of the morning peak hour, however the staff leaving after Shift 1 may travel during the morning traffic peak hour and were therefore included in the operational assessment of the intersections.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 10

The remaining number of employees was assumed to be office/admin staff working normal office hours and therefore traveling during normal peak hours.

In order to consider a worst-case scenario the maximum number of employees was considered during the ramp-up stages of the mine. The assumed trip generation characteristics of the operational staff is summarised in Table 4.3 below.

Table 4.3: Operational Staff Peak Hour Trip Generation

Employee Transport Mode Number Number of Vehicle Category % of of PCU’s* Employees Vehicle Type Occupancy (EC) EC Vehicles Office Staff 153 Passenger Car 100% 1.5 102 102 Passenger Car 5% 1.5 11 11 Shift Workers 320 Minibus Taxi 25% 12 7 7 (3 x shifts) (per shift) Bus 70% 60 4 20 Total 1 113 124 140

* Passenger Car Units: It was assumed that one bus is equivalent to 5 PCU’s.

5.1.2.2 Heavy Vehicle Trip Generation

It was estimated that the mine would generate approximately five truck trips per day during normal operations (importing materials, service providers, etc). Rock waste from mining operations will be a marketable commodity. The estimated monthly tonnage of waste to be sold in crushed and screened form is 30 000 tons. Assuming transport by means of 30 ton trucks this could potentially result in 1 000 trucks per month. Since these trips are not expected to be generated during the peak hours, it was excluded from the intersection analysis, but considered for the pavement loading assessment.

5.2 WORST-CASE TRAFFIC SCENARIO

From the above it is concluded that the construction and operational phases will overlap for approximately four years, as shown on the timeline below. The peak hour trip generation of the mine from site establishment through to normal operations is summarised in Table 4.4, which indicates that the maximum trip generation is expected during the aforementioned 4-year overlap period. Taking the effect of background traffic growth into account it can therefore be concluded that worst-case traffic scenario would be 2027, which was considered in the operational analysis of the intersections.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 11

Table 4.4: Peak Hour Trip Generation over Time

5.3 TRIP ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION

5.3.1 Employee Trips

Taung Gold indicated that employees would be responsible for their own accommodation and it was therefore assumed that staff will reside in nearby towns and residential areas. The trips were assigned in the following proportions:

Table 4.5: Employee Trip Assignment Town/ Percentage of Position relative Affected Township Employees to Jeanette Mine Intersections* Bothaville and 15% North (±40km) M3 Khotsong Allanridge 10% North-west M2 and M3 Hospital Park and 10% Sout-west M4 and M6 Hestersrus Odendaalsrus 10% South M4 Thabong Extensions, South-east Riebeeckstad and 10% M4 and M5 (±20km) surrounds Welkom, Rheederpark and 30% South (±20km) M4, M5 and M7 surrounds Kroonstad, Thelma 15% East (±60km) M4 and Kutlwanong

* Refer to Section 3.1 for intersection numbers.

The trip distribution (combined construction and operational trips) is shown in Figures 7A to 8B in Appendix A

5.3.2 Heavy Vehicle Trips (Trucks)

All truck traffic will be accommodated from the northern access to the mine, via the T-junction of the R30 and S86.

Taking the heavy vehicles volumes indicated by the electronic counts into account, 30% of the truck traffic associated with the mine construction and operation was distributed to the norh-east and 70% to the south-west along the R30.

5.4 TRAFFIC GROWTH

An average growth rate of 3% was applied to the background traffic.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 12

6 OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT

6.1 LEVELS OF SERVICE

Operating conditions of peak hours are normally assessed in terms of Levels of Service (LOS), V volume to capacity ratios ( /C) and average delay.

At this point it is worth considering what is meant in terms of levels of service. In this regard the following extract from the US Highway Capacity Manual is given:

“The concept of levels of service used qualitative measures that characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and passengers. The descriptions of individual levels of service characterize these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to manoeuvre, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.

Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility for which analysis procedures are available. They are given letter designations, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions.

The volume of traffic that can be served under the stop-and-go conditions of LOS F is generally accepted as being lower than possible at LOS E, consequently, service flow rate E is the value that corresponds to the maximum flow rate, or capacity, on the facility. For most design or planning purposes, however, service flow rates D or C are usually used because they ensure a more acceptable quality of service to facility users.”

6.2 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS

The AM and PM peak hours of the following scenarios have been considered for analysis:

à 2015 Traffic: Existing traffic volumes obtained from the traffic counts; and à 2027 Traffic: Worst-case scenario with construction and operational trip volumes, as well as 3% annual growth applied to the background traffic. The traffic volumes and trip distribution for this scenario are shown on Figures 9A to 10B in Appendix A. 6.3 SIDRA ANALYSIS RESULTS

The critical intersections were analysed using SIDRA Software (Version 6.1). The schematic layouts of the intersections, as well as the detailed results are included in Appendix D and discussed below.

6.3.1 2015 Traffic Volumes

The SIDRA results indicate that all the critical intersections are currently operating at good levels V of service (LOS A and B), with /C ratios well below 0.950 and minimal delays.

6.3.2 2027 Traffic Volumes

The analysis of the 2027 traffic volumes showed that the impact of the proposed mine will not V result in any levels of service dropping to below the acceptable LOS D and all /C ratios will remain well below the maximum 0.950. Taking into account that the worst-case scenario does not result

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 13

in unacceptable operational conditions at any of the critical intersections, it was not considered necessary to analyse any other scenarios.

6.4 MITIGATION MEASURES

The traffic impact of any proposed development should be mitigated under the following circumstances:

à If the LOS of any element of the facility drops below D; V à If the volume to capacity ( /C) ratio of any element of the facility increases above 0.95; and à If the contribution of the development is at least 2% of the sum of the critical lane volumes of the element. V à Or; where the baseline LOS is E or worse, or /C ratio is greater than 0.95, this baseline (prior to development) must be maintained or improved for the situation with the development included.

The above relates to the operating conditions during the peak hour traffic and considering the SIDRA results discussed in Section 5.3 above no mitigation measures are required at the critical intersections.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 14

7 MINE ACCESS

7.1 ACCESS SPACING

Access to the mine will be off the S86 at the proposed location shown on Figure 3 in Appendix A.

Taking the characteristics of the S86 into account it can be classified as rural Class 4 collector road. In terms of the South African Road Classification and Access Management Manual (TRH 26)(7) direct access to properties is allowed from this class of road.

The location of the proposed access road with the S86 is approximately halfway between two access roads to the east of the S86 and spaced more than 1km from both of these access roads.

This spacing is exceeds the minimum requirement and is considered to be safe and the proposed access location is considered to be acceptable from a traffic engineering point of view.

7.2 QUEUE STORAGE LENGTH

It was indicated that the access to the mine will be access controlled by means of a boom and will be manually operated by a guard. For this reason adequate queue storage length should be provided at the boom to avoid vehicles queueing in the road.

The maximum inbound volume will occur during the morning peak hour, i.e. 367 PCU’s. The estimated service rate at a manual operated boom is 200 vehicles per hour (vph). Since the hourly demand is higher than the service rate one inbound lane will not be sufficient. Two inbound lanes with at least 75 m stacking distance on each would be required.

The length of the proposed access road is approximately 475m and the required queue storage length could therefore easily be accommodated at the access control.

Since queing of outbound vehicles will not affect the public road network, one outbound lane could be provided.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 15

8 ROAD SAFETY ISSUES

The following issues are considered to be relevant to road safety: à Shoulder sight distance; à Heavy vehicle turning movements; and à Road surface conditions. 8.1 SHOULDER SIGHT DISTANCE

Shoulder sight distance is the distance that the driver of a vehicle that is stationary at the stop line of a minor road can see along the major road, to be able to enter or cross the major road before an approaching vehicle reaches the intersection. It is therefore a function of speed of vehicles traveling on the major road, the width of the major road and the type of vehicles that are trying to cross.

Shoulder sight distance should be considered at the T-junction of R30 with the S86 (gravel road) which will be the truck access to Jeanette mine. The current speed limit on the R30 is 100km/h and the road width is approximately 7.5 m. The worst-case design vehicle is a single unit and trailer (SU+T). According to TRH 17(2), Geometric Design of Rural Roads, the shoulder sight distance should be in the order of 380m.

The R30 to the south-west of the S86 is relatively straight and downhill, resulting in more than adequate shoulder sight distance in this direction. However, the shoulder sight distance to the north-east is limited to ± 250 m as a result of the climbing terrain in this direction.

It is therefore recommended that the speed limit on the R30 in advance of the S86 T-junction should be reduced to 60km/h. The required shoulder sight distance would then be reduced to ±230m, i.e. the available sight distance will be adequate. The speed should be reduced in increments of 20km/h by means of SARTSM(5) compliant road signs. The 60km/h signs should be implemented on the R30 northbound and southbound 300m in advance of the S86 T-junction. The 80km/h signs should be placed 200m in advance of the 60km/h signs.

8.2 HEAVY VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENTS

The W107 and W108 intersection warning signs should be erected on the R30 120m in advance of the S86 T-junction (on either sides) in accordance with the requirements of the South African Road Traffic Signs Manual(5) (SARTSM). It is recommended that IN 11.569 supplementary warning plates be added to these warning signs indicating the presence of heavy vehicles at the intersection. Images of the aforementioned warning signs are shown below.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 16

8.3 ROAD SURFACE CONDITIONS

8.3.1 R30

As mentioned in Section 2.3 the visual assessment of the R30 between Welkom and the S86 revealed that the road had recently been refurbished and no surface problems were observed.

8.3.2 S86

The S86, which will provide access to Jeanette mine is a fairly smooth/even and flat gravel road, and no surface problem areas were observed.

8.4 RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING

There is an existing railway level crossing on the S86/Haupfleish Street, ± 2.8 km from the Jeanette mining boundary and 1.5 km from Intersection M4 – see Photograph 4 in Appendix B. Road signs in line with the requirement of SARTSM(5), i.e. Railway Crossing sign W403 and a supplementary Stop (R1) sign have been implemented.

Considering that this level crossing is enroute the staff access to the mine additional safety measures could be considered, eg. safety boom operation in accordance with Chapter 7 (par. 7.2.5) of the South African Road Traffic Signs Manual (Signing for Railway Crossings). It would be advised that this crossing should be carefully monitored and incidents/accidents should be recorded to determine whether additional safety measures are required.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 17

9 ROAD PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT

9.1 CURRENT TRAFFIC LOADING

Traffic loading is measured in E80’s which is defined by the Guidelines for Provision of Engineering Services and Amenities in Residential Township Development (Amended 1995) as follows:

“The cumulative damaging effect of all individual axle loads is expressed as the number of equivalent 80 kN single axle loads (E80’s). This is the number of 80 kN single-axle loads that would cause the same damage to the pavement as the actual spectrum of axle loads.”

The impact of the light vehicles along the R30 is considered to be insignificant. The 24-hour 7- day average traffic volumes from Table 3.1 were used to determine the existing heavy vehicle loading. It was assumed that the average heavy vehicle is equal to 3 E80’s and the calculated current heavy vehicle traffic loading is given in Tables 7.1 (north of Jeanette mine) and 7.2 (south of Jeanette mine):

Table 7.1: Current Loading North of Jeanette Mine Heavy Vehicles Direction E80's per Year MESA* per Year per Day Northbound 167 182 865 0.183 Southbound 250 273 750 0.274 * Million Equivalent Standard Axles.

Table 7.2: Current Loading South of Jeanette Mine Heavy Vehicles Direction E80's per Year MESA* per Year per Day Northbound 364 398 580 0.399 Southbound 753 824 535 0.825 * Million Equivalent Standard Axles.

9.2 ADDITIONAL LOADING ON THE R30

The cumulative effect of the existing and additional traffic loading from Jeanette mine along the R30 is analysed over the estimated life of the mine.

The number of trucks per annum as described in Chapter 4 is summarised in Table 7.3 below. It was assumed that one empty truck would return from Jeanette mine for every loaded truck that departs from the mine and vice versa.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 18

Table 7.3: Annual Truck Trip Generation by Jeanette Mine

To/From Total North- South- Trip Loaded/ Project Phase Jeanette Number east west Purpose Empty Mine of Trips (30%) (70%) Materials Loaded 1 320 396 924 To Waste Empty 1 320 396 924 Construction Total 2 640 792 1 848 Only Materials Empty 1 320 396 924 From Waste Loaded 1 320 396 924 Total 2 640 792 1 848 Materials Loaded 2 880 864 2 016 To Waste Empty 13 320 3 996 9 324 Rock Construction & Total 16 200 4 860 11 340 Operations Materials Empty 2 880 864 2 016 From Waste rock Loaded 13 320 3 996 9 324 Total 16 200 4 860 11 340 Materials Loaded 1 560 468 1 092 To Waste rock Empty 12 000 3 600 8 400 Operations Total 13 560 4 068 9 492 Only Materials Empty 1 560 468 1 092 From Waste rock Loaded 12 000 3 600 8 400 Total 13 560 4 068 9 492

Using the average E80’s for different heavy vehicle configurations provided in the THR16 manual (Traffic Loading for Pavement and Rehabilitation Design) and considering that the majority of the vehicles will be material transporters (3-axles) it was assumed that the loaded trucks would be equal to 2.6 E80’s and the empty trucks would be equal to 0.2 E80’s.

The annual additional traffic loading (E80’s) as a result of the Jeanette mine is summarized in Table 7.4 below.

Table 7.4: Annual E80 Traffic Loading as a result of Jeanette Mine

R30 North-east R30 South-west Project Phase To Mine From Mine To Mine From Mine Construction Only 1 109 1 109 2 587 2 587 Construction & 3 046 10 562 7 106 24 646 Operations Operations Only 1 937 9 454 4 519 22 058

It was assumed that the mine will operate at steady state production for 18 years, i.e. up to 2047. The cumulative pavement loading of the mine over the construction period and life of the mine is summarised in Table 7.5.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 19

Table 7.5: Cumulative Heavy Vehicle Loading from Jeanette Mine on the R30

Number R30 North-east R30 South-west Project Phase of years To Mine From Mine To Mine From Mine Construction Only 6 6 654 6 654 15 522 15 522 Construction & 4 12 184 42 248 28 424 98 584 Operations Operations Only 21 40 677 198 534 94 899 463 218 Total E80’s 31 59 515 247 436 138 845 577 324 Total MESA* 31 0.06 0.25 0.14 0.58

* Million Equivalent Standard Axles

9.3 ADDITIONAL LOADING ON S86

The heavy vehicle loading on the S86 as a result of Jeanette mine is summarised in Table 7.6 below.

Table 7.6: Cumulative Heavy Vehicle Loading from Jeanette Mine on the S86

Number Project Phase To Mine From Mine of years

Construction Only 6 22 176 22 176 Construction & 4 40 608 140 832 Operations Operations Only 21 129 120 630 240 Total E80’s 31 191 904 793 248 Total MESA* 31 0.19 0.79

* Million Equivalent Standard Axles 9.4 SUGGESTED MEASURES

The additional loading on the R30 due to the proposed mine is very low compared to the existing heavy vehicle loading, i.e. the cumulative impact of the mine over its entire life span is expected to be less than the annual impact of the current traffic on the R30. This, together with the observed good condition of the R30, do not require any mitigation measures with respect to the proposed mine.

Similarly the heavy vehicle loading on the S86 is expected to be relatively low and the gravel road may be adequate to accommodate this traffic. Further investigation in terms of the stability of this road is suggested to determine the bearing capacity of the road and to make recommendations in terms of the required structure of the road, taking the estimated loading in Table 7.6 into account.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 20

10 INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES

10.1 ISSUES RAISED BY IAP’S

Public consultation does not form part of the scope of the traffic impact study, however a public consultation process is undertaken as part of the EIA and EMP process. Comments from interested and affected parties relating to roads and traffic received to date are tabulated below with a brief response from the Traffic Specialist.

Table 8.1: IAP Comments Comment Date comment Comment Response raised by was raised

Uys van Heerden 25 June 2015 With the condition the The additional heavy at the public road is currently in, it vehicle traffic is expected scoping meeting won’t be able to handle to be low and to have a the additional traffic, minimal impact on the especially with big trucks R30. Further that will use the roads. investigation into the stability of the S86 (gravel road) is recommended.

Willem Naude, 26 June 2015 The province has two A site development plan Odendaalsrus at the public roads on either side of needs to be submitted to Community scoping meeting the mine; the R30 to the the relevant local west and gravel to the authority for approval. east. Both roads have They will circulate it to building restrictions to the relevant provincial the development and authorities or request connecting roads. The submissions to these provincial department of departments for roads need to be comments and approval. consulted in this regard.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 21

11 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

11.1 CONCLUSIONS

In view of the findings in this assessment, the following conclusions may be drawn:

(i) The critical intersections will still operate at acceptable levels of service during the 2027 AM and PM peak hours with the combined impact of construction and operational staff traffic.

(ii) The heavy vehicle impact of the mine will be relatively low.

(iii) The shoulder sight distance to the north-east at Intersection M3 from the S86 approach is currently insufficient for the worst-case design vehicle (SU+T).

(iv) The road surface of the affected section of the R30 was observed to be in a good condition.

11.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

Taking the above conclusions into account the proposed Jeanette mine can be supported from a traffic perspective, subject to the following recommendations:

(i) The speed limit on the R30 in advance of the T-junction with the S86 should be reduced from 100km/h to 60km/h, as discussed in Section 6.1.

(ii) SARTSM compliant warning signs W107 and W108, combined with suplementary heavy vehicle warning plates (IN 11.569) should be erected along the R30 on either side of the T- junction with the S86, as discussed in Section 6.2.

(iii) Based on the assumption that the mine access will be controlled by a manually operated boom, the access to the mine should have two inbound lanes with queue storage length of 75m each.

(iv) Further investigation into the bearing capacity of the S86 is required to confirm if the existing gravel road is suitable for the estimated heavy vehicle loading.

(v) The railway level crossing on the S86/Haupfleish Street should be monitored for incidents/accidents and increased safety/warning measures should be considered if this crossing proves to be a safety hazard.

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 22

12 REFERENCES

1. Manual for Traffic Impact Studies, Report RR93/635, Department of Transport, October 1995

2. TRH 17, Geometric Design for Rural Roads, CSIR, Pretoria, 1988

3. Taung Gold Jeanette Project Pre-Feasibility Study (Ref. 2013-023a), Minxcon Projects, 2014

4. Taung Gold Jeanette Project Execution Plan (Ref. 2013-023a), Minxcon Projects, July 2014

5. Southern African Development Community Road Traffic Signs Manual, 3rd Edition. National Department of Transport, 1998, South Africa. 6. National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998). Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014, Appendix 6.

7. South African Road Classification and Access Management Manual (TRH 26), Version 1.0, August 2012. Committee of Transport Officials (COTO).

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 23

13 APPENDICES

Appendix A Figures

Appendix B Photographs

Appendix C Traffic Data

Appendix D SIDRA Results

Appendix E NEMA Regulations (2014) Checklist

Appendix F Curriculum Vitae

Taung Gold Jeanette Project TIS WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Synergistics (SLR group) Project No. 19520.R April 2016 Appendix A

FIGURES

Natal KwaZulu- Mpumalanga Limpopo Area Proposed MiningRight Gauteng Kilometers March2016 Welkom Free State Coord System: DMS Datum: WGS84, Lo27 Scale: 1 :74500 @A3 SLR Consulting (Africa) (Pty)Consulting SLR Ltd North West 0 1 2 P O 1596, Cramerview,Box P 2060, South Africa Tailings Dam and ReturnTailings Water Dam Complex Tel: +27 Tel: (11)+27 Fax: 467-0945 (11) 467-0978 ProposedMining Area Right RockWaste Dump ShaftComplex Plant Complex RawWaterDam Main Roads Gravel Roads Powerlines Railway line Sedibeng WaterPipeline Eskom Sub-Station 710.20006.00009 ! [ ±

Northern Cape TAUNGGOLD (FREESTATE) (PTY) LTD

!!!!!! Legend Figure2 Locality andConceptual Layout Map !!

-28 -28 -28 -28

! !

! !! !

! ! !

! !! !

! !

! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !

! ! ! !

! !

! ! ! ! ! Kutlwanong

! ! !

! ! ! ! O

! ! !

! ! ! ! !

! ! ! !

! ! !

! ! ! !

! ! !

27 ! ! 27 ! ! !

! !

! ! !

! ! ! ! ! !

! ! !

! ! ! ! ! !

4 !

! ! 3 R !

! !

! ! !

1 !

! !

! ! !

! ! t

! ui Thelma ! r

p TSHEPONG MINE

s ! O

! d

27 n 27

! a 0 ! S 7

R ! !

! !

! ! !

! !

! ! ! !

! !

! ! ! ! ! !

! !

! ! 6 !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 8

! !

! ! S

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !

! ! ! [ ! t

! ! !

! 9 ! ! !

8 !

S ! ! ! S

! ! ! ! !

! ! !

! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! l !

! ! ! !

! ! !

! ! ! a ! ! 4

! 3 ! ! ! ! !

! ! R !

! ! !

! ! a

! ! ! ! !

! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! d ! ! !

! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !

! !

! ! ! e !

! n

n 4 ! !

! ! ! ! i

! ! ! !

! ! ! L ! ! !

! ! e

! O

! ! ! ! y 3 ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! a

! !

! ! ! ! ! v

! w d ! ! l ! ! ! R ! ! i

! ! ! ! a B

! ! R l r O

! na h e ! ! ! ! o !

! ! i ! eg g v

R i y ! ! ! ! le

! V ! ! r

! ! ! E r ! ! ! e d ! ! ! ! ! n

! a

! 0 ! V !

3 !

! ! ! !

R !

! ! !

! !

! !! !

! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! !

! ! ! ! !

! !

! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! !

27 27 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! !

! Nyakallong

! !

! ! O

! !

! ! ! FREDDIESGOLD MINE ! !

! ! ! !

! !

! ! !

! !

! ! o !

Allanridge l

fa ! ! !

! O f ! !

u ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! !

B ! ! !

! !

n r !

! !

B !

! ! ! 27 27

LORRAINEGOLD MINE SHAFT3 !

! ! !

LORRAINEGOLD MINE SHAFT1 &2 !

! !

! ! !

! !

-28 -28 -28 -28

E1 Φ Γ Κ Η Κ Φ Θ / M3 Γ ς Χ &

86 & % # e <

n i [ ∃

M Π e Ψ t

Χ t Τ e & n

J 0 3 o R T

0 3 R

Allanridge

0 3

R Ο Γ ς Υ [ 5 Ι Π Κ S Ρ

8 Ρ

6 Χ 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν Π 1 Υ

,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 5 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ Υ Ω

Φ Figure 4A - Traffic Count Stations Γ ς

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 Nyakallong Γ Allanridge Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

e in

M e t

t e

Φ e Γ

Κ J Η Κ

Φ o

Θ T / Γ ς Χ

& R 3 0 & % # <

M4 [ ∃ Π Ψ Χ Τ &

Odendaalsrus R34

R 3 0 R34

M5 4 R3 M6 R 70 Ο Γ ς Υ [ 5

Ι 3

Π R Κ R Ρ

Ρ 3 Χ 0 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν Π 1 Υ M7 ,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 5 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π

Κ E2 Υ Ω

Φ Figure 4B - Traffic Count Stations Γ ς

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5

Γ Odendaalsrus Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ ( Φ Γ

Κ 7 Η Κ

Φ 7 Θ 1 / Γ ς Χ & 18 S 6 86 21

& 1 % # e <

n i [ ∃

M Π e Ψ t

Χ t Τ e & n

J 0 3 o R T

0 3 R

Allanridge

1 2 06

7 0 6 0 3 9 R

Ο 9

Γ 5 ς

Υ 6 [ 5 Ι Π Κ S Ρ

8 Ρ

6 Χ 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν Π 1 Υ

,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 5 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ Υ Ω

Φ Figure 5A - Allanridge Γ ς

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 Nyakallong Γ Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

e in

M e t

t e

Φ e Γ

Κ J Η Κ

Φ o

Θ 5 T / 1 Γ ς Χ

& R 3 6 0 4

& 2

% 9 # < [ ∃ Π Ψ Χ Τ &

Odendaalsrus R34

R 3 0 R34

4 R3 R 1 70 8 8 8 1 86 Ο

Γ 6 ς 8 Υ [ 5

Ι 1 3

Π 4 R Κ R Ρ 7 Ρ 3 1 1

Χ 6 0 3 9 6+6.∋ / 5 Γ 3 Π Κ Ν 6 Π 3 9

1 1 3

2 1 Υ 2 40 ,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 2 8 5 44 1 9 0 5

+ 9 ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ

Υ 4 Ω 7 Φ 1 Figure 5B - Odendaalsrus Γ

ς 1 Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

Φ 0 Γ

Κ 0 Η Κ

Φ 1 Θ 1 / Γ ς Χ & 13 S 7 86 25

& 17 % # e <

n i [ ∃

M Π e Ψ t

Χ t Τ e & n

J 0 3 o R T

0 3 R

Allanridge

1 6 46 4 1 0 1 0 3 6 R

Ο 5

Γ 5 ς

Υ 6 [ 5 Ι Π Κ S Ρ

8 Ρ

6 Χ 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν Π 1 Υ

,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 5 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ Υ Ω

Φ Figure 6A - Allanridge Γ ς

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 Nyakallong Γ Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

e in

M e t

t e

Φ e Γ

Κ J Η Κ 0

Φ o

Θ 1 T / 4 Γ ς Χ

& R 3 5 0 8

& 3

% 4 # < [ ∃ Π Ψ Χ Τ &

Odendaalsrus R34

R 3 0 R34

4 R3 R7 1 1 0 4 6 4 1 96 Ο

Γ 5 ς 1 Υ [ 5

Ι 5 3

Π 3 R Κ R Ρ 8 Ρ 3 1 4

Χ 8 0 9 2 6+6.∋ / 0 Γ 8 Π Κ Ν 8 Π 8 2

1 1 7

3 2 Υ 0 01 ,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 6 5 5 35 9 9 5 5

+ 5 ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ

Υ 7 Ω 2 Φ 1 Figure 6B - Odendaalsrus Γ

ς 5

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 8 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ ( Φ Γ Κ Η Κ 5 Φ

Θ 5 / Γ ς Χ &

86 27 3 16

& 14 % # e <

n i [ ∃

M Π e Ψ t

Χ t Τ e & n

J 0 3 o R T

0 3 R

Allanridge

0 3

R Ο Γ ς Υ [ 5 Ι Π Κ S Ρ

8 Ρ

6 Χ 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν Π 1 Υ

,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 5 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ Υ Ω

Φ Figure 7A - Allanridge Γ ς

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 Nyakallong Γ AM Peak Hour Trip Distribution Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

e in

M e t

t e

Φ e Γ

Κ J Η Κ

Φ o Θ 2 7 T / 2 Γ ς Χ

& R 3 0 8

7 & % # < [ ∃ Π Ψ Χ Τ &

Odendaalsrus R34

R 3 0 R34

4 R3 R 70 3 7 4

Ο 1 Γ

ς 1 Υ [ 5

Ι 3

Π 4 R Κ R Ρ

Ρ 3 Χ 0 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν

Π 0 1

1 3 Υ 1 7 ,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 1 5 1 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ

Υ 1 Ω 1 Φ Figure 7B - Odendaalsrus Γ

ς 0

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 AM Peak Hour Trip Distribution

Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ ( Φ Γ Κ Η Κ Φ Θ / Γ ς Χ &

& 13 % 7 # e <

n i [ ∃

M Π e Ψ t

Χ t Τ e & n

J 0 3 o R T

0 3 R

Allanridge

7 3

0 3

R Ο Γ ς Υ [ 5 Ι Π Κ S Ρ

8 Ρ

6 Χ 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν Π 1 Υ

,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 5 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ Υ Ω

Φ Figure 8A - Allanridge Γ ς

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 Nyakallong Γ PM Peak Hour Trip Distribution Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

e in

M e t

t e

Φ e Γ

Κ J Η Κ 8 Φ 7 o Θ 1 5 T / 2 Γ ς Χ

& R 3 0 & % # < [ ∃ Π Ψ Χ Τ &

Odendaalsrus R34

R 3 0 R34

4 R3 R 70 37

Ο 1

Γ 0 ς

Υ 1 [ 5

Ι 7 3

Π 3 R Κ R Ρ

Ρ 3 Χ 0 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν Π 1 Υ 1 ,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 0 5 1 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ Υ Ω

Φ Figure 8B - Odendaalsrus Γ ς

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 PM Peak Hour Trip Distribution

Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

Φ 0 Γ

Κ 1 Η Κ

Φ 1 1 Θ 6 / Γ ς Χ & 17 S 9 86 12 4 1

& 16 % # e <

n i [ ∃

M Π e Ψ t

Χ t Τ e & n

J 0 3 o R T

0 3 R

Allanridge

4 1 2 51 4 1 6 8 0 3 1 R

Ο 4

Γ 3 ς 1 Υ 9 [ 5 Ι Π Κ S Ρ

8 Ρ

6 Χ 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν Π 1 Υ

,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 5 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ Υ Ω

Φ Figure 9A - Allanridge Γ ς

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 Nyakallong Γ 2027 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

e in

M e t

t e

Φ e Γ

Κ J Η Κ

Φ o Θ 9 1 T / 3 Γ ς Χ

& R 3 8 0 2 4

& 4

% 1 # < [ ∃ Π Ψ Χ Τ &

Odendaalsrus R34

R 3 0 R34

4 R3 R 1 6 70 2 5 5 26 1 9 Ο 1 Γ

ς 0 Υ [ 5

Ι 3 3

Π 6 R Κ R Ρ 6 Ρ 3 1 2

Χ 9 0 9 7 6+6.∋ / 2 Γ 9 Π Κ Ν 0 Π 4 1

1 1 7 2

4 2 Υ 7 39 ,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 4 1 5 63 1 9 5 1 4 5

+ 1 ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ

Υ 1 Ω 8 Φ 1 Figure 9B - Odendaalsrus Γ ς 5 6 Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 2027 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

Γ 8

Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

Φ 3 Γ

Κ 4 Η Κ

Φ 1 Θ 1 / Γ ς Χ & 14 S 0 86 27 1

& 14 % 7 # e <

n i [ ∃

M Π e Ψ t

Χ t Τ e & n

J 0 3 o R T

0 3 R

Allanridge

2 9 08 8 8 3 4 1 0 3 0 R

Ο 8

Γ 3 ς

Υ 9 [ 5 Ι Π Κ S Ρ

8 Ρ

6 Χ 6+6.∋ / Γ Π Κ Ν Π 1 Υ

,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 5 9 5 + ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ Υ Ω

Φ Figure 10A - Allanridge Γ ς

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 Nyakallong Γ 2027 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ (

e in

M e t

t e

Φ e Γ

Κ J Η Κ 3 Φ 3 o Θ 3 6 T / 2 Γ ς Χ

& R 3 0 7

5 4

& 4

% 8 # < [ ∃ Π Ψ Χ Τ &

Odendaalsrus R34

R 3 0 R34

4 R3 R7 2 2 0 0 3 5 31 1 6 Ο 8 Γ

ς 3 Υ [ 5

Ι 7 3

Π 8 R Κ 5 R Ρ 2 Ρ 3 2 6

Χ 1 0 7 0 6+6.∋ / 1 Γ 5 Π Κ

Ν 2 Π 1 1 6

1 1 2

4 2 Υ 5 4 87 ,ΓΧΠΓςςΓ2ΤΘΛΓΕς 2 1 8 5 50 4 9

9 8 5

+ 1 ) Κ (+)74∋0Θ Ι Π Κ

Υ 1 Ω 0 Φ 2 Figure 10B - Odendaalsrus Γ

ς 2 3

Χ 5ΘΩΤΕΓΥ∋ΥΤΚ∗∋4∋&Γ.ΘΤΟΓ75)5 5 2027 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

Τ +ΠςΓΤΟΧΡΚΠΕΤΓΟΓΠς2%ΘΤΡ04%#0∋ΥΤΚ

% ,ΧΡΧΠ/∋6+∋ΥΤΚ%ϑΚΠΧ∗ΘΠΙ−ΘΠΙ∋ΥΤΚ 6ϑΧΚΝΧΠΦ/ΧΡΟ[+ΠΦΚΧ1ΡΓΠ5ςΤΓΓς/ΧΡ Ο Γ Ν Κ ΕΘΠςΤΚ∆ΩςΘΤΥΧΠΦςϑΓ)+57ΥΓΤ%ΘΟΟΩΠΚς[ ( Appendix B

PHOTOGRAPHS Photograph 1: R30 provincial road

Photograph 2: S86 gravel road Photograph 3: Speed Limit on S86

Photograph 4: Railway level crossing on S86/Hauptfleish Street Appendix C

TRAFFIC DATA

Appendix D

SIDRA RESULTS SITE LAYOUT Site: Existing AM T-junction of R30 and Buffalo Road (access road to Allanridge) Stop (Two-Way)

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Created: 09 October 2015 07:26:21 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M2 - R30 & Buffalo Rd.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing AM T-junction of R30 and Buffalo Road (access road to Allanridge) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h NorthEast: R30 (N) 2 T1 79 15.0 0.033 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.04 0.06 78.8 1 R2 9 29.0 0.033 7.5 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.09 0.14 61.9 Approach 88 16.5 0.033 0.8 NA 0.0 0.2 0.04 0.07 76.6

NorthWest: Buffalo (W) 12 L2 2 0.0 0.163 8.5 LOS A 0.3 1.9 0.42 0.90 55.4 10 R2 114 0.0 0.163 10.1 LOS B 0.3 1.9 0.42 0.90 55.3 Approach 116 0.0 0.163 10.1 LOS B 0.3 1.9 0.42 0.90 55.3

SouthWest: R30 (S) 9 L2 138 3.0 0.086 7.4 LOS A 0.1 1.1 0.05 0.59 59.3 8 T1 90 6.0 0.053 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 80.0 Approach 228 4.2 0.086 4.5 LOS A 0.1 1.1 0.03 0.36 66.0

All Vehicles 432 5.6 0.163 5.2 NA 0.3 1.9 0.14 0.44 64.5

Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (HCM 2000). Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement Minor Road Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements. NA: Intersection LOS and Major Road Approach LOS values are Not Applicable for two-way sign control since the average delay is not a good LOS measure due to zero delays associated with major road movements. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 07 October 2015 02:14:40 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M2 - R30 & Buffalo Rd.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing PM T-junction of R30 and Buffalo Road (access road to Allanridge) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h NorthEast: R30 (N) 2 T1 112 8.0 0.035 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.01 79.8 1 R2 1 0.0 0.035 6.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.01 65.5 Approach 113 7.9 0.035 0.1 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.01 79.7

NorthWest: Buffalo (W) 12 L2 7 0.0 0.248 8.5 LOS A 0.4 3.1 0.43 0.90 55.5 10 R2 176 1.0 0.248 10.2 LOS B 0.4 3.1 0.43 0.90 55.1 Approach 183 1.0 0.248 10.1 LOS B 0.4 3.1 0.43 0.90 55.1

SouthWest: R30 (S) 9 L2 67 2.0 0.042 7.3 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.01 0.61 59.6 8 T1 78 17.0 0.059 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 80.0 Approach 146 10.1 0.059 3.4 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.01 0.28 69.0

All Vehicles 442 5.7 0.248 5.3 NA 0.4 3.1 0.18 0.47 64.4

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 07 October 2015 02:14:41 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M2 - R30 & Buffalo Rd.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 AM T-junction of R30 and Buffalo Road (access road to Allanridge) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h NorthEast: R30 (N) 2 T1 113 15.0 0.050 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.06 0.07 78.4 1 R2 18 29.0 0.050 7.7 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.15 0.18 61.2 Approach 132 17.0 0.050 1.2 NA 0.0 0.4 0.07 0.09 75.4

NorthWest: Buffalo (W) 12 L2 45 0.0 0.314 9.0 LOS A 0.6 4.2 0.47 0.95 54.3 10 R2 162 0.0 0.314 12.2 LOS B 0.6 4.2 0.47 0.95 54.2 Approach 208 0.0 0.314 11.5 LOS B 0.6 4.2 0.47 0.95 54.2

SouthWest: R30 (S) 9 L2 196 3.0 0.124 7.4 LOS A 0.2 1.6 0.08 0.58 59.2 8 T1 129 6.0 0.076 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 80.0 Approach 325 4.2 0.124 4.5 LOS A 0.2 1.6 0.05 0.35 66.0

All Vehicles 664 5.4 0.314 6.0 NA 0.6 4.2 0.19 0.49 63.3

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:06:00 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M2 - R30 & Buffalo Rd.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 PM T-junction of R30 and Buffalo Road (access road to Allanridge) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h NorthEast: R30 (N) 2 T1 159 8.0 0.061 0.1 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.06 0.10 77.7 1 R2 41 0.0 0.061 7.0 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.17 0.25 61.8 Approach 200 6.4 0.061 1.5 NA 0.1 0.6 0.09 0.13 73.8

NorthWest: Buffalo (W) 12 L2 11 0.0 0.431 9.9 LOS A 1.1 7.5 0.59 1.05 53.0 10 R2 251 1.0 0.431 13.6 LOS B 1.1 7.5 0.59 1.05 52.7 Approach 261 1.0 0.431 13.4 LOS B 1.1 7.5 0.59 1.05 52.7

SouthWest: R30 (S) 9 L2 96 2.0 0.062 7.5 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.11 0.58 59.1 8 T1 112 17.0 0.085 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 80.0 Approach 208 10.1 0.085 3.5 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.05 0.27 68.7

All Vehicles 670 5.4 0.431 6.8 NA 1.1 7.5 0.27 0.53 62.6

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 03:22:47 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M2 - R30 & Buffalo Rd.sip6 SITE LAYOUT Site: Existing AM T-junction of R30 and S86 (HV access road to Jeanette mine) Stop (Two-Way)

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Created: 09 October 2015 07:28:15 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M3 - R30 & S86.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing AM T-junction of R30 and S86 (HV access road to Jeanette mine) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: S86 5 L2 3 0.0 0.013 9.2 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.29 0.85 63.2 4 R2 9 0.0 0.013 9.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.29 0.85 62.7 Approach 12 0.0 0.013 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.29 0.85 62.8

NorthEast: R30 (N) 3 L2 1 100.0 0.086 7.9 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.02 57.2 2 T1 103 19.0 0.086 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.02 79.8 Approach 104 20.0 0.086 0.2 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.02 79.4

SouthWest: R30 (S) 8 T1 84 19.0 0.034 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.01 79.7 7 R2 1 0.0 0.034 6.9 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.02 73.6 Approach 85 18.7 0.034 0.1 NA 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.01 79.6

All Vehicles 201 18.3 0.086 0.7 NA 0.0 0.1 0.02 0.06 78.2

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 07 October 2015 03:09:06 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M3 - R30 & S86.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing PM T-junction of R30 and S86 (HV access road to Jeanette mine) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: S86 5 L2 16 0.0 0.015 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.23 0.87 63.3 4 R2 2 0.0 0.015 9.6 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.23 0.87 62.8 Approach 18 0.0 0.015 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.23 0.87 63.2

NorthEast: R30 (N) 3 L2 1 0.0 0.076 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.01 74.5 2 T1 116 9.0 0.076 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.01 79.8 Approach 117 8.9 0.076 0.1 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.01 79.8

SouthWest: R30 (S) 8 T1 86 10.0 0.030 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.03 0.04 79.0 7 R2 6 0.0 0.030 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.06 0.08 72.2 Approach 92 9.4 0.030 0.5 NA 0.0 0.1 0.03 0.04 78.5

All Vehicles 227 8.4 0.076 1.0 NA 0.0 0.2 0.03 0.09 77.6

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 07 October 2015 03:09:07 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M3 - R30 & S86.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 AM T-junction of R30 and S86 (HV access road to Jeanette mine) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: S86 5 L2 18 0.0 0.064 9.5 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.38 0.88 62.2 4 R2 33 0.0 0.064 11.1 LOS B 0.1 0.7 0.38 0.88 61.7 Approach 52 0.0 0.064 10.5 LOS B 0.1 0.7 0.38 0.88 61.9

NorthEast: R30 (N) 3 L2 81 4.0 0.167 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.23 69.0 2 T1 147 19.0 0.167 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.23 75.4 Approach 228 13.6 0.167 2.5 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.23 73.0

SouthWest: R30 (S) 8 T1 120 19.0 0.062 0.2 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.10 0.12 77.0 7 R2 51 0.0 0.062 7.4 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.30 0.36 66.9 Approach 170 13.4 0.062 2.3 NA 0.1 0.8 0.16 0.19 73.7

All Vehicles 450 12.0 0.167 3.4 NA 0.1 0.8 0.11 0.29 71.8

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:08:16 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M3 - R30 & S86.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 PM T-junction of R30 and S86 (HV access road to Jeanette mine) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: S86 5 L2 107 0.0 0.260 9.7 LOS A 0.5 3.3 0.40 0.89 62.4 4 R2 127 0.0 0.260 11.0 LOS B 0.5 3.3 0.40 0.89 62.0 Approach 234 0.0 0.260 10.4 LOS B 0.5 3.3 0.40 0.89 62.2

NorthEast: R30 (N) 3 L2 1 0.0 0.109 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 74.5 2 T1 166 9.0 0.109 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 79.9 Approach 167 8.9 0.109 0.1 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 79.8

SouthWest: R30 (S) 8 T1 122 10.0 0.042 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.04 0.04 79.0 7 R2 8 0.0 0.042 7.1 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.08 0.08 72.1 Approach 131 9.4 0.042 0.5 NA 0.0 0.2 0.04 0.04 78.5

All Vehicles 532 5.1 0.260 4.7 NA 0.5 3.3 0.19 0.41 70.7

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 03:22:18 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M3 - R30 & S86.sip6 SITE LAYOUT Site: Existing AM T-junction of Hauptfleisch St (employee access road to Jeanette mine) & Erleigh Blvd Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Created: 09 October 2015 07:32:49 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M4 - Hauptfleisch & Erleigh.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing AM T-junction of Hauptfleisch St (employee access road to Jeanette mine) & Erleigh Blvd Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: Erleigh (E) 5 L2 40 0.0 0.026 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.06 0.55 53.4 4 R2 1 0.0 0.026 5.7 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.06 0.55 52.9 Approach 41 0.0 0.026 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.06 0.55 53.4

NorthEast: Hauptfleisch (N) 3 L2 3 0.0 0.010 5.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 57.5 2 T1 16 0.0 0.010 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 59.1 Approach 19 0.0 0.010 0.9 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.10 58.8

SouthWest: Hauptfleisch (S) 8 T1 11 0.0 0.032 0.1 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.08 0.46 55.8 7 R2 44 4.0 0.032 5.5 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.08 0.46 53.6 Approach 56 3.2 0.032 4.4 NA 0.1 0.4 0.08 0.46 54.0

All Vehicles 116 1.5 0.032 4.3 NA 0.1 0.4 0.06 0.43 54.5

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:10:39 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M4 - Hauptfleisch & Erleigh.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing PM T-junction of Hauptfleisch St (employee access road to Jeanette mine) & Erleigh Blvd Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: Erleigh (E) 5 L2 47 3.0 0.033 5.7 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.10 0.55 53.2 4 R2 4 0.0 0.033 5.8 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.10 0.55 52.8 Approach 51 2.8 0.033 5.7 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.10 0.55 53.2

NorthEast: Hauptfleisch (N) 3 L2 13 0.0 0.028 5.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.17 56.8 2 T1 32 10.0 0.028 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.17 58.4 Approach 45 7.1 0.028 1.6 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.17 57.9

SouthWest: Hauptfleisch (S) 8 T1 9 0.0 0.047 0.1 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.13 0.50 55.2 7 R2 70 5.0 0.047 5.6 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.13 0.50 53.1 Approach 80 4.4 0.047 5.0 NA 0.1 0.6 0.13 0.50 53.3

All Vehicles 175 4.6 0.047 4.3 NA 0.1 0.6 0.09 0.43 54.4

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:10:39 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M4 - Hauptfleisch & Erleigh.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 AM T-junction of Hauptfleisch St (employee access road to Jeanette mine) & Erleigh Blvd Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: Erleigh (E) 5 L2 56 0.0 0.386 5.7 LOS A 0.7 5.0 0.23 0.61 52.9 4 R2 382 0.0 0.386 6.5 LOS A 0.7 5.0 0.23 0.61 52.4 Approach 438 0.0 0.386 6.4 LOS A 0.7 5.0 0.23 0.61 52.5

NorthEast: Hauptfleisch (N) 3 L2 100 0.0 0.069 5.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.45 54.6 2 T1 29 0.0 0.069 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.45 56.0 Approach 129 0.0 0.069 4.3 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.45 54.9

SouthWest: Hauptfleisch (S) 8 T1 52 0.0 0.069 0.3 LOS A 0.1 0.9 0.22 0.31 56.5 7 R2 63 4.0 0.069 5.9 LOS A 0.1 0.9 0.22 0.31 54.3 Approach 115 2.2 0.069 3.4 NA 0.1 0.9 0.22 0.31 55.2

All Vehicles 682 0.4 0.386 5.5 NA 0.7 5.0 0.18 0.53 53.4

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:11:45 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M4 - Hauptfleisch & Erleigh.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 PM T-junction of Hauptfleisch St (employee access road to Jeanette mine) & Erleigh Blvd Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: Erleigh (E) 5 L2 66 3.0 0.053 5.9 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.20 0.55 52.9 4 R2 5 0.0 0.053 8.8 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.20 0.55 52.5 Approach 71 2.8 0.053 6.1 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.20 0.55 52.9

NorthEast: Hauptfleisch (N) 3 L2 848 0.0 0.528 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.52 53.9 2 T1 106 10.0 0.528 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.52 55.3 Approach 955 1.1 0.528 5.0 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.52 54.1

SouthWest: Hauptfleisch (S) 8 T1 13 0.0 0.213 7.6 LOS A 0.4 2.6 0.77 0.81 49.8 7 R2 100 5.0 0.213 13.1 LOS B 0.4 2.6 0.77 0.81 48.1 Approach 113 4.4 0.213 12.5 NA 0.4 2.6 0.77 0.81 48.3

All Vehicles 1139 1.5 0.528 5.8 NA 0.4 2.6 0.09 0.55 53.4

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 03:21:28 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M4 - Hauptfleisch & Erleigh.sip6 SITE LAYOUT Site: Existing AM T-junction of Findley Ave (R34) and Church St (R70) Stop (Two-Way)

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Created: 09 October 2015 07:36:42 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M5 - R34 & Church(R70).sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing AM T-junction of Findley Ave (R34) and Church St (R70) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R70 (S) 9 L2 92 1.0 0.052 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 54.9 8 T1 159 0.0 0.080 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 60.0 Approach 251 0.4 0.080 2.1 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.19 58.0

NorthWest: Church (N) 2 T1 209 3.0 0.114 5.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.57 53.5 1 R2 76 7.0 0.102 10.1 LOS B 0.1 1.0 0.41 0.93 50.5 Approach 285 4.1 0.114 6.6 LOS A 0.1 1.0 0.11 0.66 52.7

SouthWest: Findley/R34 (W) 12 L2 95 10.0 0.138 7.3 LOS A 0.2 1.6 0.32 0.45 53.0 10 R2 44 14.0 0.138 8.7 LOS A 0.2 1.6 0.32 0.45 51.5 Approach 139 11.3 0.138 7.8 NA 0.2 1.6 0.32 0.45 52.5

All Vehicles 676 4.2 0.138 5.2 NA 0.2 1.6 0.11 0.44 54.5

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:13:36 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M5 - R34 & Church(R70).sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing PM T-junction of Findley Ave (R34) and Church St (R70) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R70 (S) 9 L2 66 8.0 0.046 5.7 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.52 54.7 8 T1 226 4.0 0.126 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 60.0 Approach 292 4.9 0.126 1.3 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.12 58.7

NorthWest: Church (N) 2 T1 223 2.0 0.118 5.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.57 53.6 1 R2 58 20.0 0.090 11.4 LOS B 0.1 1.0 0.45 0.95 49.6 Approach 281 5.7 0.118 6.6 LOS A 0.1 1.0 0.09 0.65 52.7

SouthWest: Findley/R34 (W) 12 L2 102 13.0 0.153 7.7 LOS A 0.2 1.8 0.33 0.43 52.5 10 R2 37 25.0 0.153 10.1 LOS B 0.2 1.8 0.33 0.43 50.7 Approach 140 16.2 0.153 8.4 NA 0.2 1.8 0.33 0.43 52.0

All Vehicles 712 7.4 0.153 4.8 NA 0.2 1.8 0.10 0.39 54.8

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:13:37 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M5 - R34 & Church(R70).sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 AM T-junction of Findley Ave (R34) and Church St (R70) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R70 (S) 9 L2 131 1.0 0.074 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 54.9 8 T1 272 0.0 0.136 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 60.0 Approach 402 0.3 0.136 1.8 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.17 58.2

NorthWest: Church (N) 2 T1 302 3.0 0.165 5.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.57 53.5 1 R2 124 7.0 0.234 13.2 LOS B 0.3 2.5 0.58 1.02 48.7 Approach 426 4.2 0.234 7.6 LOS A 0.3 2.5 0.17 0.70 52.0

SouthWest: Findley/R34 (W) 12 L2 317 10.0 0.361 8.4 LOS A 0.7 5.3 0.33 0.41 51.9 10 R2 62 14.0 0.361 13.3 LOS B 0.7 5.3 0.33 0.41 50.5 Approach 379 10.7 0.361 9.2 NA 0.7 5.3 0.33 0.41 51.7

All Vehicles 1207 4.9 0.361 6.2 NA 0.7 5.3 0.16 0.43 53.8

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:14:30 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M5 - R34 & Church(R70).sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 PM T-junction of Findley Ave (R34) and Church St (R70) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R70 (S) 9 L2 94 8.0 0.065 5.7 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.52 54.7 8 T1 322 4.0 0.181 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 60.0 Approach 417 4.9 0.181 1.3 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.12 58.7

NorthWest: Church (N) 2 T1 359 2.0 0.190 5.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.57 53.6 1 R2 208 20.0 0.404 15.3 LOS C 0.8 6.3 0.62 1.09 47.3 Approach 567 8.6 0.404 9.0 LOS A 0.8 6.3 0.23 0.76 51.1

SouthWest: Findley/R34 (W) 12 L2 145 13.0 0.261 10.9 LOS B 0.6 4.5 0.51 0.39 49.9 10 R2 53 25.0 0.261 14.9 LOS B 0.6 4.5 0.51 0.39 48.3 Approach 199 16.2 0.261 12.0 NA 0.6 4.5 0.51 0.39 49.5

All Vehicles 1183 8.6 0.404 6.8 NA 0.8 6.3 0.19 0.47 53.2

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 03:20:38 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M5 - R34 & Church(R70).sip6 SITE LAYOUT Site: Existing AM T-junction of R30 and Odendaal St Stop (Two-Way)

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Created: 09 October 2015 07:37:47 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M6 - R30 & Odendaal St.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing AM T-junction of R30 and Odendaal St Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R30 (S) 8 T1 203 8.0 0.063 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 100.0 7 R2 55 6.0 0.035 7.5 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.22 0.57 58.2 Approach 258 7.6 0.063 1.6 NA 0.1 0.5 0.05 0.12 86.7

NorthEast: Odendaal (W) 6 L2 93 3.0 0.056 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 54.8 4 R2 57 2.0 0.091 11.6 LOS B 0.1 1.0 0.49 0.92 56.7 Approach 150 2.6 0.091 7.9 LOS A 0.1 1.0 0.19 0.68 55.5

NorthWest: R30 (N) 3 L2 21 0.0 0.013 7.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.61 59.7 2 T1 105 10.0 0.034 8.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 70.7 Approach 126 8.3 0.034 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.65 68.6

All Vehicles 535 6.4 0.091 4.9 NA 0.1 1.0 0.07 0.40 71.0

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:15:58 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M6 - R30 & Odendaal St.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing PM T-junction of R30 and Odendaal St Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R30 (S) 8 T1 134 14.0 0.048 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 100.0 7 R2 110 1.0 0.071 7.6 LOS A 0.1 0.9 0.28 0.59 58.1 Approach 244 8.1 0.071 3.4 NA 0.1 0.9 0.13 0.26 75.5

NorthEast: Odendaal (W) 6 L2 95 3.0 0.057 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 54.8 4 R2 38 6.0 0.066 12.4 LOS B 0.1 0.7 0.52 0.92 55.4 Approach 132 3.9 0.066 7.6 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.15 0.64 55.0

NorthWest: R30 (N) 3 L2 18 6.0 0.012 7.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.61 59.4 2 T1 166 9.0 0.053 8.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 71.1 Approach 184 8.7 0.053 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 69.7

All Vehicles 560 7.3 0.071 6.0 NA 0.1 0.9 0.09 0.48 67.6

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:15:58 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M6 - R30 & Odendaal St.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 AM T-junction of R30 and Odendaal St Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R30 (S) 8 T1 290 8.0 0.090 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 99.9 7 R2 78 6.0 0.052 7.7 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.27 0.58 57.9 Approach 368 7.6 0.090 1.6 NA 0.1 0.7 0.06 0.12 86.6

NorthEast: Odendaal (W) 6 L2 133 3.0 0.081 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 54.8 4 R2 87 2.0 0.184 14.3 LOS B 0.3 2.0 0.60 1.00 54.6 Approach 221 2.6 0.184 9.1 LOS A 0.3 2.0 0.24 0.72 54.8

NorthWest: R30 (N) 3 L2 77 0.0 0.047 7.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.61 59.7 2 T1 149 10.0 0.048 8.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 70.7 Approach 226 6.6 0.048 7.9 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.65 66.5

All Vehicles 815 6.0 0.184 5.4 NA 0.3 2.0 0.09 0.43 69.7

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:17:14 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M6 - R30 & Odendaal St.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 PM T-junction of R30 and Odendaal St Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R30 (S) 8 T1 191 14.0 0.068 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 100.0 7 R2 157 1.0 0.109 7.9 LOS A 0.2 1.5 0.35 0.61 57.9 Approach 348 8.1 0.109 3.6 NA 0.2 1.5 0.16 0.28 75.2

NorthEast: Odendaal (W) 6 L2 134 3.0 0.081 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 54.8 4 R2 94 6.0 0.218 15.7 LOS C 0.3 2.5 0.64 1.01 53.0 Approach 228 4.2 0.218 9.8 LOS A 0.3 2.5 0.26 0.72 54.1

NorthWest: R30 (N) 3 L2 26 6.0 0.017 7.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.61 59.4 2 T1 236 9.0 0.075 8.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 71.1 Approach 262 8.7 0.075 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 69.7

All Vehicles 838 7.3 0.218 6.7 NA 0.3 2.5 0.14 0.52 66.5

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 03:19:32 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M6 - R30 & Odendaal St.sip6 SITE LAYOUT Site: Existing AM T-junction of R30 R34 (Findley Ave) Stop (Two-Way)

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Created: 08 October 2015 04:01:02 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M7 - R30 & R34.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing AM T-junction of R30 R34 (Findley Ave) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R30 (S) 8 T1 163 11.0 0.054 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 100.0 7 R2 69 23.0 0.051 7.9 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.30 0.60 56.7 Approach 232 14.6 0.054 2.4 NA 0.1 0.8 0.09 0.18 81.4

NorthEast: Findley/R34 (W) 6 L2 110 10.0 0.175 8.8 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.23 0.92 56.0 4 R2 54 2.0 0.175 12.2 LOS B 0.3 2.2 0.23 0.92 57.8 Approach 163 7.4 0.175 9.9 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.23 0.92 56.6

NorthWest: R30 (N) 3 L2 22 11.0 0.016 7.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.63 61.8 2 T1 153 7.0 0.046 7.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 72.7 Approach 175 7.5 0.046 7.2 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.65 71.1

All Vehicles 571 10.3 0.175 6.0 NA 0.3 2.2 0.10 0.54 69.6

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:19:07 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M7 - R30 & R34.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing PM T-junction of R30 R34 (Findley Ave) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R30 (S) 8 T1 190 8.0 0.059 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 100.0 7 R2 87 14.0 0.066 8.0 LOS A 0.1 0.9 0.37 0.62 56.9 Approach 277 9.9 0.066 2.5 NA 0.1 0.9 0.12 0.19 80.8

NorthEast: Findley/R34 (W) 6 L2 69 18.0 0.150 9.3 LOS A 0.2 1.9 0.30 0.93 53.7 4 R2 44 9.0 0.150 14.3 LOS B 0.2 1.9 0.30 0.93 55.5 Approach 113 14.5 0.150 11.3 LOS B 0.2 1.9 0.30 0.93 54.4

NorthWest: R30 (N) 3 L2 47 2.0 0.028 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.63 64.7 2 T1 213 8.0 0.066 7.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 72.3 Approach 261 6.9 0.066 7.2 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.65 70.8

All Vehicles 650 9.5 0.150 5.9 NA 0.2 1.9 0.10 0.50 70.8

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:19:07 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M7 - R30 & R34.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 AM T-junction of R30 R34 (Findley Ave) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R30 (S) 8 T1 232 11.0 0.077 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 100.0 7 R2 274 23.0 0.218 8.4 LOS A 0.4 3.7 0.41 0.65 56.3 Approach 506 17.5 0.218 4.6 NA 0.4 3.7 0.22 0.35 70.4

NorthEast: Findley/R34 (W) 6 L2 172 10.0 0.376 9.8 LOS A 0.8 6.0 0.34 0.93 53.4 4 R2 77 2.0 0.376 21.4 LOS C 0.8 6.0 0.34 0.93 55.1 Approach 249 7.5 0.376 13.4 LOS B 0.8 6.0 0.34 0.93 53.9

NorthWest: R30 (N) 3 L2 31 11.0 0.023 7.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.63 61.8 2 T1 218 7.0 0.066 7.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 72.7 Approach 249 7.5 0.066 7.2 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.65 71.1

All Vehicles 1004 12.5 0.376 7.4 NA 0.8 6.0 0.20 0.57 65.6

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 10:19:54 AM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M7 - R30 & R34.sip6 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 2027 PM T-junction of R30 R34 (Findley Ave) Stop (Two-Way)

Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov OD Demand Flows Deg. Average Level of 50% Back of Queue Prop. Effective Average ID Mov Total HV Satn Delay Service Vehicles Distance Queued Stop Rate Speed veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/h SouthEast: R30 (S) 8 T1 271 8.0 0.084 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 100.0 7 R2 124 14.0 0.107 8.6 LOS A 0.2 1.5 0.45 0.67 56.6 Approach 395 9.9 0.107 2.7 NA 0.2 1.5 0.14 0.21 80.5

NorthEast: Findley/R34 (W) 6 L2 236 18.0 0.400 10.4 LOS B 0.9 7.4 0.41 0.93 52.7 4 R2 62 9.0 0.400 22.0 LOS C 0.9 7.4 0.41 0.93 54.5 Approach 299 16.1 0.400 12.8 LOS B 0.9 7.4 0.41 0.93 53.0

NorthWest: R30 (N) 3 L2 67 2.0 0.040 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.63 64.7 2 T1 304 8.0 0.094 7.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 72.3 Approach 372 6.9 0.094 7.2 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.65 70.8

All Vehicles 1066 10.6 0.400 7.1 NA 0.9 7.4 0.17 0.57 67.5

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 | Copyright © 2000-2015 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD | Processed: 08 October 2015 03:18:42 PM Project: W:\Deltek Projects\19000\19520.R - Jeanette Project TIA\11 - Reports\11.1 Other Reports\SIDRA\M7 - R30 & R34.sip6 Appendix E

NEMA REGULATIONS (2014) CHECKLIST NEMA Regs (2014) - Appendix 6 Relevant section in report Details of the specialist who prepared the report Chapter 1 The expertise of that person to compile a specialist report including a curriculum Section 1.3 and Appendix F vitae A declaration that the person is independent in a form as may be specified by the Section 1.5 competent authority An indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared Sections 2.1 and 2.3 The date and season of the site investigation and the relevance of the season to the Sections 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 outcome of the assessment A description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the Section 2.4 specialised process The specific identified sensitivity of the site related to the activity and its associated Section 3.3 structures and infrastructure An identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers No buffer areas applicable. A map superimposing the activity including the associated structures and No buffer areas applicable. infrastructure on the environmental sensitivities of the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; A description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or gaps in knowledge; Assumptions regarding: · Construction worker trip generation: Section 5.1.1.1 · Construction heavy vehicle trip generation: Section 5.1.1.2 · Employee trip generation during operations: Section 5.1.2.1 · Employee origins and destination (distribution): Section 5.3.1 · Heavy vehicle trip generation during operations: Section 5.1.2.2 · Average E80’s of current heavy vehicles: Section 8.1 · Additional heavy vehicle loading and E80’s: Section 8.2 A description of the findings and potential implications of such findings on the impact Section 10.1 of the proposed activity, including identified alternatives, on the environment Any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr Section 10.2 Any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation Section 10.2 Any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or environmental Section 10.2 (iv) authorisation A reasoned opinion as to whether the proposed activity or portions thereof should be From a traffic perspective the impact of the proposed activity is expected to be authorised and relatively low and could be easily mitigated by the measures recommended in Section 10.2 and can therefore be supported from a traffic engineering point of view. If the opinion is that the proposed activity or portions thereof should be authorised, Section 10.2 any avoidance, management and mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr, and where applicable, the closure plan A description of any consultation process that was undertaken during the course of Not specifically as part of the traffic impact study. Refer to Section 9.1 for issues carrying out the study raised by IAP’s and responses from the Traffic Specialist. A summary and copies if any comments that were received during any consultation Section 9.1 process Any other information requested by the competent authority. Not applicable. Appendix F

CURRICULUM VITAE HUTCHINSON CORNELIA, Traffic & Transportation Engineer DEVELOPMENT, TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

CAREER SUMMARY Mrs Hutchinson is a traffic and transportation engineer with over 10 years’ experience in the civil engineering sector. She has extensive knowledge of traffic impact studies and access management plans, including traffic studies for new and existing mines, large industrial developments (as part of Environmental Impact Assessments) and ports (landside). Countries of work experience include South-Africa, Uganda and Lesotho. She plays a key role as senior traffic engineer in WSP’s Bedfordview office, where she is primarily responsible for traffic and transportation-related projects in Ekurhuleni.

EDUCATION YEARS WITH THE FIRM 2011 7 years BEng (Hons) Transportation Engineering, University of Pretoria BEng Civil Engineering, University of Pretoria 2003 YEARS TOTAL

11 years PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS PROFESSIONAL Professional Engineer, Engineering Council of South Africa (20130451) 2013 QUALIFICATIONS Graduate Member, South African Institute of Civil Engineers (201236) 2003 Professional Engineer

AREAS OF PRACTICE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Traffic impact studies à Re-application for the security access restrictions in Freeway Park, Boksburg, South Africa (Current): Traffic Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Traffic/ access Freeway Park Residents Association. Fee Value: ZAR 27,000. management plans à Multi-Disciplinary Engineering Services for a Private Vehicle Proving Ground Traffic studies for Development Northern Cape, South Africa (Current): Traffic Engineer - Traffic environmental Impact Study. Client: Ingen│Aix GmbH. Fee Value: ZAR8.6 m. authorisations à Brentwood Park Ext. 39 development, Benoni, South Africa (Current): Senior Traffic signal design Traffic Engineer - Overseeing the Traffic Impact Study for the proposed Parking studies residential development. Client: PTY Props 56. Fee Value: ZAR 40,000.

LANGUAGES à Environmental Authorisation for the Middelburg Colliery Expansions Project, Middelburg, South Africa (2015): Traffic Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. English Client: Jones & Wagener. Fee Value: ZAR 80,000. Afrikaans à Eveleigh Ext. 55 Access, Boksburg, South Africa (2015): Traffic Engineer - Amendments to the Ekurhuleni Roads Masterplan. Client: Edgarvale 8. Fee Value: ZAR 12,000. à Rezoning of Portion 22 and the remainder of Portion 23 of Erf 252 Edenburg, Johannesburg, South Africa (2015): Traffic Engineer - Traffic Impact Study for the proposed high-density residential development. Client: Expectio Properties. Fee Value: ZAR 48,000. à Comaro Crossing Shopping Centre Upgrades, Johannesburg, South Africa (2015): Traffic Engineer - Providing access design advice and obtaining JRA HUTCHINSON CORNELIA, Traffic & Transportation Engineer

approval for upgrades to the shopping centre access. Client: SA Retail Properties (Broll Property Group). Fee Value: ZAR 17,500. à Traffic Signal Investigations and Design, Ekurhuleni, South Africa (2015): Project Manager - Traffic signal warrant investigations, design and optimisation on an as-and-when required basis. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 175,400. à Ekurhuleni West College (EWC) Parking Relaxation Studies, Ekurhuleni, South Africa (2015): Traffic Engineer - Parking relaxation studies for two EWC campuses (Tembisa and Boksburg). Client: VMR Architects. Fee Value: ZAR 109,000. à Ekurhuleni Unified Command Centre, Boksburg, South Africa (2015): Senior Traffic Engineer - Traffic Impact Study for a unified control/command centre for various EMM Services. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 84,400. à Parkdene Ext. 3 Portion 2 Erf 654, Boksburg, South Africa (2015): Traffic Engineer – Section 7 report, parking relaxation and traffic impact assessment for the rezoning. Client: Simplegrow Properties 9. Fee Value: ZAR 80,000. à Comet Future Development, Boksburg, South Africa (Current): Managing the traffic impact assessment and SATURN model development for the proposed mixed-use development on Comet Ext. 18. Client: Living Africa. Fee Value: ZAR 131,000. à Sunward Park Shopping Centre Upgrades, Boksburg, South Africa (Current): Traffic Engineer – Parking relaxation and traffic impact assessment. Client: Acucap Investments. Fee Value: ZAR 118,000. à Matholesville Ext. 3 to 5 (Spitzland), Roodepoort, South Africa (Current): Traffic Engineer – Parking relaxation and traffic impact assessment. Client: Living Africa Development. Fee Value: ZAR 82,000. à Bardene Erven 100 and 101 Office/Car Showroom Development, South Africa (2015): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Assessment. Client: WJH Properties. Fee Value: ZAR 48,900. à Monte Cristo Estate Traffic Signals, Beyers Park, South Africa (2015): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Signal warrant investigation and design. Client: Monte Cristo Homeowners Association. Fee Value: ZAR 45,000. à Scoping and Environmental Impact Reporting and Environmental Management Programme for Klipfontein Environmental Approvals, South Africa (2015): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Assessment. Client: Sub-consultant to Jones & Wagener for BECSA. Fee Value: ZAR 112,500. à Collins Road Closure Traffic Impact Study, Bedfordview, South Africa (2015): Senior Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study for new security access restrictions. Client: Collins Road Home Owners. Fee Value: ZAR 19,600. à Morehill Glen Traffic Impact Study, Benoni, South Africa (2015): Senior Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study for the re-application for security access restrictions. Client: Morehill Glen Community Security. Fee Value: ZAR 22,700. à Bonaero Park Erf 765 Section 7, Bonaero Park, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Report in terms of Section 7 of the Gauteng Transport

– Page 2 of 7 HUTCHINSON CORNELIA, Traffic & Transportation Engineer

Infrastructure Act for the impact of the subdivision of Erf 174. Client: Nine Nine Ninety Nine Projects. Fee Value: ZAR 19,000. à Plantation Road, Bedfordview, South Africa (2014): Senior Traffic Engineer – Traffic impact assessment for the implementation of security access restrictions. Client: Jurgens Bekker Attorneys. Fee Value: ZAR 20,000. à The Stewards Ext. 20 Access Road, Boksburg/Benoni, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – traffic signal warrant, designs and revision of existing traffic signals associated with the development. Client: Investec Property. Fee Value: ZAR 69,000. à Commercia Ext. 9 Parking Relaxation Study, Tembisa, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – parking relaxation study for the proposed wholesale development in Commercia Ext. 9. Client: Jazz Spirit. Fee Value: ZAR 39,000. à Environmental Impact Assessment for the Kraft Paper Mill, Frankfort, Free State, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Assessment. Client: Industrial Development Corporation. Fee Value: ZAR 72,000. à Proposed Supplier Park Development, Kathu, Northern Cape, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Assessment. Client: Synergistics for Anglo American, Kumba Iron Ore. Fee Value: ZAR 124,500. à Rehabilitation of the Main Road Maqhaka to Hleoheng Road and Mt Moorosi to Qhoali Road, Lesotho (2014): Traffic Engineer – Intersection and route capacity analysis, Climbing lane determination, E80 loading, Traffic Calming Measures. Client: Ministry of Public Works and Transport Lesotho. Fee Value: ZAR 11.1 m. à Butsanani Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Management Programme for the proposed Rietvlei Opencast Coal Mine, Mpumalanga, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Assessment. Client: WSP Environment & Energy. Fee Value: ZAR 98,900. à Access Management Plan and Traffic Impact Study for Balmoral Ext. 1, Germiston, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Access Management Plan and Traffic Impact Assessment. Client: Actom. Fee Value: ZAR 54,000. à Township Establishment of Ravenswood Ext. 79, Boksburg, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study and Access. Client: Klaprops 243. Fee Value: ZAR 71,900. à Access Management Plan and Section 7 Report for Portions A & D of Driefontein 85 IR, Boksburg, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Access Management Plan and Section 7 Report. Client: North Rand Property Investments cc. Fee Value: ZAR 40,800. à Township Establishment of Vulcania Ext. 13, Brakpan, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study and Access Plan. Client: Euro Body Builders cc. Fee Value: ZAR 55,900. à Transnet Ports Terminal Traffic Management Study for the Richards Bay Terminal, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Management Study. Client: Transnet Port Terminals. Fee Value: ZAR 350,000. à Anglo Alexander Environmental Impact Assessment Project in Kriel, Mpumalanga, South Africa (2014): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study for the proposed new coal mine. Client: Synergistics (SLR Group). Fee Value: ZAR 72,000.

– Page 3 of 7 HUTCHINSON CORNELIA, Traffic & Transportation Engineer

à Mackenzie Park Muslim School, Benoni, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study. Client: Everite Building Products. Fee Value: ZAR 25,500. à Goedeburg Ext. 50 Church Development, Benoni, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study. Client: Emseni Christian Centre. Fee Value: ZAR 45,500. à Lifehouse Church, Johannesburg, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study. Client: Lifehouse Church. Fee Value: ZAR 26,800. à Re-application for Security Access Restrictions at Angus road, Bedfordview, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study. Client: Angus Close Residents Association. Fee Value: ZAR 7,980. à N3 Rehabilitation Warden to Keeversfontein, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Capacity analysis using High Capacity Manual Software and the Highway Traffic Model. Client: N3 Toll Concession. Fee Value: ZAR 50,000. à Indigo Place Residential Development, Kew, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study. Client: H. Weinberg. Fee Value: ZAR 22,200. à National Ports Plan, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic and transportation status quo report and planning for Richards Bay and Durban Ports. Client: Transnet National Ports Authority. Fee Value: ZAR 100,000. à The Stewards Ext. 13 Residential Development, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Revised Traffic Impact study (land use changes since 2011 study). Client: President Towers. Fee Value: ZAR 30,000. à Parking Relaxation Study for Erf 1012, Bedfordview Ext. 189, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Parking reduction study. Client: Maxidor SA. Fee Value: ZAR 29 800. à Freeway Park Security Closure, Ekurhuleni, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Site development plans at the access restriction locations. Client: Freeway Park Residents Association. Fee Value: ZAR 24,260. à As-and-when Roads Rehabilitation Project, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Accommodation Plans for during construction. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 50,000. à Division of Land on Farm Driefontein 85-IR, Boksburg, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Access Management Plan. Client: Lumina Export and Import cc. Fee Value: ZAR 20,000. à Future Industrial Development in Comet, Boksburg, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Access Management Plan. Client: Copper Moon Trading 631. Fee Value: ZAR 57,000. à Conference Centre on Bardene Ext. 92 and 98, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study. Client: Cloversgreen Investments. Fee Value: ZAR 42,400. à Security Access Restrictions in Oriel North, Bedfordview, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study. Client: Oriel North Residents Association. Fee Value: ZAR 28,300. à Industrial Development on Lilianton Ext. 12, Ptn. 10 Driefontein 85 IR, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic Impact Study. Client: Able Wise Trading 47. Fee Value: ZAR 38 600.

– Page 4 of 7 HUTCHINSON CORNELIA, Traffic & Transportation Engineer

à Township Regeneration Strategy, South Africa (2013): Traffic Engineer – Traffic and transportation status quo report and planning in Vosloorus, Kathlehong, Daveyton and Wattville. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 100,000. à Newmarket Shopping Centre, Alberton, South Africa (2012): Traffic Engineer - Traffic Signal Design. Client: Internal. Fee Value: ZAR 45,000. à Crux-Capella Security Access Restrictions, Solheim, South Africa (2012): Traffic Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Crux-Capella Residents Association. Fee Value: ZAR 28,000. à Industrial Development on Germiston Ext. 41, South Africa (2012): Traffic Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Garsin Properties. Fee Value: ZAR 44,000. à Proposed New Yzermyn Coal Mine, Mpumalanga, South Africa (2012): Traffic Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: WSP Environmental. Fee Value: ZAR 150,000. à Phuthaditchaba Taxi Rank, South Africa (2012): Engineer - Feasibility Study. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 497,040. à Driefontein 87 IR Farm, Germiston, South Africa (2012): Engineer - Access Management Plan for various portions of farm. Client: Copper Moon Trading 631. Fee Value: ZAR 62,300. à New Access Control Measures in Hillcrest Ave, Bedfordview, South Africa (2012): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Cresthill Homeowners Association. Fee Value: ZAR 19,000. à Laying Eskom Cables in Edenvale, South Africa (2012): Engineer - Traffic Management Plans. Client: CBI Electric – African Cables. Fee Value: ZAR 46,000 à Laying of Eskom Cables in Isando, South Africa (2012): Engineer - Traffic Management Plan. Client: CBI Electric – African Cables. Fee Value: ZAR 12,000. à North Villa Close Re-application of Security Access Restrictions, South Africa (2012): Project manager - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Benoni North Community Precinct. Fee Value: ZAR 22,760. à Re-application of Libradene Security Village Access Restrictions, South Africa (2012): Project manager - Traffic Impact Evaluation. Client: Libradene Security Village. Fee Value: ZAR 11,600. à Mixed-use Development on Bassonia Ext. 1, South Africa (2012): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Home Talk Developments. Fee Value: ZAR 45,000. à Proposed Beyers Park Ext 112 and 120 over Westwood Small Holdings 41 and 40, South Africa (2012): Project manager - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Planet Waves 140 and STM Mining Equipment. Fee Value: ZAR 56,040. à Extension and Upgrading of Dunswart Taxi Rank to a Full Scale Public Transport Modal Transfer Facility, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Feasibility Study. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 168,000. à Proposed Development of Holding 46, Bartlett Ext. 1, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Ronnie Matthews Investment Holdings. Fee Value: ZAR 24,700.

– Page 5 of 7 HUTCHINSON CORNELIA, Traffic & Transportation Engineer

à Re-application for Security Access Restrictions at East Village, Sunward Park, Boksburg, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: East Village Residents Association. Fee Value: ZAR 5,450. à Proposed Sintel Char Plant Expansion Grootegeluk Mine, Lephalale, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Synergistics Environmental Services. Fee Value: ZAR 131,000. à Proposed New Largo Mine, Mpumalanga, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Synergistics Environmental Services. Fee Value: ZAR 206,602. à Proposed Bedfordview Ext. 526, Farm Bedford 68 IR, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Speyside Properties. Fee Value: ZAR 35,000. à Proposed LED Advertising Sign on Oxford/ Corletta Dr. Illovo, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic Impact Assessment. Client: Wideopen Platform. Fee Value: ZAR 10,700. à Robor Main Entrance on Barbara Road, Elandsfontein, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic signal/access investigation. Client: Robor. Fee Value: ZAR 31,000. à Rezoning of Erf 759 Dalview on the K118, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Report in terms of Section 7 of the Gauteng Transport Infrastructure Act for the impact of the proposed rezoning. Client: Futureplan Urban Design and Planning Consultants. Fee Value: ZAR 11,800. à Proposed New Eerstelingsfontein Opencast Coal Mine in Belfast, Mpumalanga, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: WSP Environment and Energy. Fee Value: ZAR 126,800. à New Access Control Measures in Lavin Road, Bedfordview, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Tag Security. Fee Value: ZAR 11,246. à Supplementary Access to the Stewards Ext. 13 and 14, Benoni, South Africa (2011): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: H Weinberg. Fee Value: ZAR 25,000. à Intersections (Signalised and Unsignalised) in Ekurhuleni, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Investigation, SIDRA analysis and optimisation of various intersections. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. à Renewal of Access Control Measures, Disa Road, Bedfordview, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Disa Road Closure Association. Fee Value: ZAR 17,625. à Renewal of Access Control Measures, Leicester Road, Bedford Gardens, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Safetyzone. Fee Value: ZAR 14,285. à Determine if South-to-east Loop is required at Northern Terminal of N12/Kingsway Interchange after Implementation of Alliance Road Off-ramp, Daveyton, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Traffic Study. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 30,000. à Portion 1 of the Farm Driefontein 87 IR, on Future Routes K110 and 127, Germiston, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Report in terms of Section 7 of the Gauteng Transport Infrastructure Act for the impact of the proposed division of land. Client: Business Venture Investments 752. Fee Value: ZAR 15,000. – Page 6 of 7 HUTCHINSON CORNELIA, Traffic & Transportation Engineer

à Rezoning of the Remainder of Erf 477 and Portion 2 of Erf 478 Eastleigh Township, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Futureplan Urban Design and Planning. Fee Value: ZAR 30,000. à Rezoning of the Remainder of Erf 477 and Portion 2 of Erf 478 Eastleigh Township on the future K68, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Report in terms of Section 7 of the Gauteng Transport Infrastructure Act for the impact of the proposed rezoning. Client: Futureplan Urban Design and Planning Consultants. Fee Value: ZAR 15,000. à Portion 205, 227 and the Remainder of Portion 1 of the Farm Driefontein 87 IR and the Remainder of Portion 2 of Elandsfontein 90 IR, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Access Management Plan. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 45,000. à Proposed Township Comet Ext. 14 on Portion 403 of the Farm Driefontein 85- IR, Boksburg, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Traffic Impact Study. Client: Copper Moon Trading 631. Fee Value: ZAR 40,000. à Impact of the Proposed Comet Ext.14 on the K90, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Report in terms of Section 7 of the Gauteng Transport Infrastructure Act. Client: Copper Moon Trading 631. Fee Value: ZAR 15,000. à Proposed Comet Ext. 11 and 14 and Portion 498 of the Farm Driefontein 85- IR, Boksburg, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Access Management Plan and Internal Road Network. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 30,000. à Comet Extensions 6, 9 and 13, Boksburg, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Access Management Study. Client: Abbeydale Civils & Building. Fee Value: ZAR 30,000. à Riley Road in Bedfordview, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Traffic study to investigate the undesirable operational conditions. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Part of as-and-when contract. à Rondebult Road in Boksburg, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Traffic study to investigate the undesirable operational conditions. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Part of as-and-when contract à Jeppe Quondam Club in Bedfordview, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Traffic Impact Assessment. Client: Penquin Airtime. Fee Value: ZAR 30,000. à New Eastgate Roof Parking Layout, South Africa (2010): Engineer - Design, tender and project management. Client: Liberty Properties. Fee Value: ZAR 200,000. à Pomona Eastern Outfall Sewer Line, Kempton Park, South Africa (2009): Engineer - Preliminary design. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 100,000. à Proposed Interchange between the N12 and Alliance road to serve the Daveyton CBD, South Africa (2009): Project Engineer – managing the design of a half-diamond interchange on the N12. Client: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. Fee Value: ZAR 2.5 m. à Preparation and Evaluation of Various Water-Related Tenders (2008): Civil Engineer at Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality’s Revenue Unit. Managing Various Leak Fixing and Water Demand Management Projects and Water Meter Installations. (2007): Water Demand Management Engineer at Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality’s Kempton Park depot.

– Page 7 of 7