System Analysis of a Gas Generator Cycle Rocket Engine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

System Analysis of a Gas Generator Cycle Rocket Engine Technical Paper ISSN 2383-4986 International Journal of Aerospace System Engineering EISSN 2508-7169 Vo l . 6, No.2, pp.11-16 (2019) http://dx.doi.org/10.20910/IJASE.2019.6.2.11 System Analysis of a Gas Generator Cycle Rocket Engine ٻ Won Kook Cho*ˋ and Chun IL Kim** *Rocket Engine Team, Korea Aerospace Research Institute 169-84, Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34133 KOREA †E-mail:[email protected] **Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta 9211 116 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 1H9 Abstract A system analysis program has been developed for a gas generator cycle liquid rocket engine of 30 ton class. Numerical models have been proposed for a combustor, a turbopump, a gas generator and pressure drop through a regenerative cooling system. Numerical algorithm has been validated by comparing with the published data of MC-1. The major source of error is not the numerical algorithm but the imperfect performance models of subsystems. So the precision of the program can be improved by revising the performance models using experimental data. The sea level specific impulse and vacuum specific impulse have been demonstrated for a 30 ton class gas generator engine. The optimal condition of combustor pressure and mixture ratio for specific impulse which is a typical characteristic of a gas generator cycle engine has been illustrated. Key Words : Liquid rocket engine, Gas generator cycle, System Analysis, Optimal Condition, Specific Impulse 1. Introduction UG {G G G G G G G G G G G hG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GUG{G G GG UG {G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G UG {G G G G G G G UG {G G G SG G SG G G G GGGG GGGGG G SGGGUG{GGGG G G G G G G G G GGGGGG G G G G G G G G G G UG pG G G SG G G G GSGGGG¡GSG G G G G G G G G G G G G SG G G UG{GG G GGGG G G G UG ~G G G G G G G G SG G G G G G G G G G SG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G ¡G G OG G ZUXG G G PUG {G G G G UG pG G SG GGGGG GG GGG GGG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G Received: Jun. 27, 2018 Revised: Oct. 11, 2019 GUG Accepted: Oct. 15, 2019 G † Corresponding Author Tel: +82-42-860-2937, E-mail: [email protected] ⡧ The Society for Aerospace System Engineering 12 Won Kook Cho · Chun IL Kim 2. Literature survey hG G G G G G G 3. Analysis Methods G G G G G v˅iG G lXUG { G G G G G 3.1. Specific Impulse G G G G G SG G {G G G G G G G G G G UG { G G G G UG {G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGG G UG{ GGywTXGGjoZGG G G G G ¡¡G UG {G G G G ywTXSG soYG G sjo[G G UG {G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGG GGG G G UG {G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGGG SG G SG G G SG GGGGGUG mUGXGGG G SG G SG G GGGGG GGG SG SG pwzG OpTwG zPSG GGGSGGGSGGSG G G G G G G G UG mUG YG G G G G UG uhzkhG G G G G G GGGGUG slT\YUG {G G G G G G G G G G ZLG G G G G G G G G G XLUG toZG G G G G G G G SG G SG G G SG G G G G UG {G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G UG {G G G G G G G G G G G GGSGGGGGGG G XWLG G YWLUG {G G G G G X[G G G G G ZWG UG {G G G G ot^iSG ysXWhTZTZhSG slT\SG zT[OthTZPSGsy`XSG\jSGoTXSGot]WSGqTYSGyzTY^SGslT [Schematic of a gas generator cycle engine[7ٻSG ys_^SG zztlG G mTXUG {G G G G Fig. 1^ G SG G SG G SG G SGGSGGSGGSG G SGGOVPSGsQSGGSGG G SG G G SG G G SG GGGSGG SG GG G SG G SG G SG G G G G G G G VG VG VG UG zjvylzG OzjG vTG yG lG zP[GGG GGGGGG G UG rG G U\G G G G G G G G G sVG UG{GGGG GG tjTXG GG GG UGhGGGG G G G G G ]UG {G G G G \¥]G G G G G Algorithm for converged mass flow rate[7,8]GٻGGG[GGGGG Fig. 2 UGG G System Analysis of a Gas Generator Cycle Rocket Engine 13 G UG mG G G G G G G {GGGGGGGGG Ɂ UGuGGGGGG ஼೑ G G G G rzs}Tpp^T`G G G GG G G G G G G כ GɁ G GGGGGtjTXXWUG ௖ jmkG G G G G G G G {G GGGGGGGG G UG pG G G G G GGGGGGG G G G G G XXSXYUG ^S_UGG mUGZGGGG GUG{G G G GGGGGGUG 3.2. Performance Model for Combustion Chamber G {G G G G G G 3.3. Performance Model for Turbopumps G G G ¡G G UG wG {G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GXZGG GlUO\PUG GGGGGUGm SG G GG G G G TG G ஐொబǤఱ G G TG ¡¡UG {G ȳ௦ ൌ బǤళఱGG G O\PG ൫௚ൈο௛Ȁேೞ೟ೌ೒೐൯ G G G G G G G G G G G {G G G G G G G G G G ¡¡G UG pG G G SG ¡¡G UG {G ¡G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGG G G UG G G G G UG iG G G G {G G G G G G G UG oG G TG G G lUOXP¥lUO[PUG GGGGGGUG G {G G G G G G G ஼כ௖ ܫ ൌ ೑GG G G OXPG G UG {G G G G G ௌ௉ ௚ ሺ௣ ሻ ஺௚ GGGGGGGGGG ൌ ೎ ೙ೞ GG G G OYPG כܿ ௠ሶ ೟೎ GGGG UGlUO]PGGlUO^PG GG G G OZPG כܿ ൌ Ɂ כܿ ௧௛ GGGUG כ௖ ௧௛ ܥ௙ ൌ Ɂ ܥ௙ GG G G O[PG G ஼೑ ଴ሻGG G G O]PGܥG Ʉ்஻ ൌ݂ሺݑȀ ംషభ ఊ ଵ ം ܥ଴ ൌ ඨʹ ܴܶ௜ ቈͳ െ ቀ ቁ ቉GG G O^PG 300 ఊିଵ గ CEA G 290 x cf G CFD 3.4. Performance Model for Gas Generator x c* {GGGG GGGG (s) SL 280 G UG {G G G G G G Isp exp x c* G G G G G G UG 270 iGGGGGGGGG G G UG {G G G GGGGGG GGG 260 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 G G G G UG {G O/F)CC G G GGGG G Correction concept of combustor efficiencyGٻFig. 3 G G UG zG G G G G G G G G UG {G G SG G G G G G G G G {GGGG GGjlhG G G G G G G G G GGGZGGGGUG{G G UG lO_P¥lUOXWPG G G G GGGGGGGGG GGGGUG GGGGGGGGG G UG{GGGGG GG 14 Won Kook Cho · Chun IL Kim ை ൌቀ ǡ݌ ቁGG G G O_PG ி ீீ ை mG\GGGGGGUG{G ܶீீ ൌቀ ǡ݌ீீቁGG G G O`PG ி G G G G G G XG UG zG G ை ߛ ൌቀ ǡ݌ ቁG G G G OXWPG ீீ ி ீீ G G G G G G G UG {G G G G G G G G G ZWG G UG 3.5. Required Pump Head Model {G GG G G G G GGG {GGGGGGGGGG G G G G G G G G G G¡GGUGpGGGGG GWUW]GtwUGhG GGGGG G G G G G G G G G G G WUW[G twG G WUXG twUG G G G G G G {G G G G G G SG GGGUG{GGG G G G G G G GGGGGGGGG UG oG G G G G G G UG zG G G G GGGGUGzGGG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G UG {G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G UG {G G G G G XSG XXUG {G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G UG {G G G G G G G G G G G G UG SG G G G G G G ~GGGGGGGG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G UG mUG [G G GG G G G GG UG hG G G G G UG {G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G UG {G G G G G GGGGGGG G G G G G G G G G G G XSG XXUG {G G G UG oSG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G UG zG G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGGG GGXGUGG GUGG G G 12 2.8 O/F)CC=2.2 O/F)CC=2.3 10 O/F)CC=2.4 2.7 O/F)CC=2.5 O/F)CC=2.6 O/F) =2.7 8 CC 2.6 O/F)CC=2.8 CC (Mpa) 6 2.5 O/F) regen p 4 2.4 2 65 2 2 6 2 6 4 2.3 3 0 2.2 4 6 8 10 12 4 6 8 10 12 p (Mpa) p (Mpa) CC CC G Sea level specific impulse (unit: s)GٻPressure drop of regenerative coolingG Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Failure Analysis of Gas Turbine Blades in a Gas Turbine Engine Used for Marine Applications
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology MultiCraft ENGINEERING, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2014, pp. 43-48 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY www.ijest-ng.com www.ajol.info/index.php/ijest © 2014 MultiCraft Limited. All rights reserved Failure analysis of gas turbine blades in a gas turbine engine used for marine applications V. Naga Bhushana Rao1*, I. N. Niranjan Kumar2, K. Bala Prasad3 1* Department of Marine Engineering, Andhra University College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam, INDIA 2 Department of Marine Engineering, Andhra University College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam, INDIA 3 Department of Marine Engineering, Andhra University College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam, INDIA *Corresponding Author: e-mail: [email protected] Tel +91-8985003487 Abstract High pressure temperature (HPT) turbine blade is the most important component of the gas turbine and failures in this turbine blade can have dramatic effect on the safety and performance of the gas turbine engine. This paper presents the failure analysis made on HPT turbine blades of 100 MW gas turbine used in marine applications. The gas turbine blade was made of Nickel based super alloys and was manufactured by investment casting method. The gas turbine blade under examination was operated at elevated temperatures in corrosive environmental attack such as oxidation, hot corrosion and sulphidation etc. The investigation on gas turbine blade included the activities like visual inspection, determination of material composition, microscopic examination and metallurgical analysis. Metallurgical examination reveals that there was no micro-structural damage due to blade operation at elevated temperatures. It indicates that the gas turbine was operated within the designed temperature conditions. It was observed that the blade might have suffered both corrosion (including HTHC & LTHC) and erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Investigation of a 7-Element GOX/GCH4 Subscale Combustion Chamber
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-173 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) Numerical Investigation of a 7-Element GOX/GCH4 Subscale Combustion Chamber ? ? ? Daniel Eiringhaus †, Daniel Rahn‡, Hendrik Riedmann , Oliver Knab and Oskar Haidn‡ ?ArianeGroup Robert-Koch-Straße 1, 82024 Taufkirchen, Germany ‡Institute of Turbomachinery and Flight Propulsion (LTF), Technische Universität München (TUM) Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany [email protected] †Corresponding author Abstract For future liquid rocket engines methane has become the focus of several studies on alternative fuels in the western hemisphere. At ArianeGroup numerical simulation tools have been established as a powerful instrument in the design process. In order to achieve the same confidence level for CH4/O2 as for H2/O2 combustion, the applied numerical models have to be adapted and validated against sufficient test data. At the Chair of Space Propulsion at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) several combustion cham- bers have been designed and tests at different operating points have been conducted. In this paper one of these subscale combustion chambers with calorimetric cooling and seven shear coaxial injection elements running on gaseous methane and oxygen is used to examine ArianeGroup’s in-house tools for combustion chamber performance analysis. 1. Introduction Current development programs in many space-faring nations focus on launchers utilizing a propellant combination of liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid methane (CH4). In Europe, hydrocarbons have been identified as an alternative fuel in the frame of the Future Launcher Preparatory Programme (FLPP).14, 23 Major industrial development of methane / oxy- gen rocket engines is ongoing in the United States at SpaceX with the Raptor engine (staged combustion), at Blue Origin with the BE-4 engine (staged combustion) and in Europe at ArianeGroup with the Prometheus engine (gas gen- erator).
    [Show full text]
  • Qualification Over Ariane's Lifetime
    r bulletin 94 — may 1998 Qualification Over Ariane’s Lifetime A. González Blázquez Directorate of Launchers, ESA, Paris M. Eymard Groupe Programme CNES/Arianespace, Evry, France Introduction Similarly, the RL10 engine on the Centaur stage The primary objectives of the qualification of the Atlas launcher has been the subject of an activities performed during the operational ongoing improvement programme. About 5000 lifetime of a launcher are: tests were performed before the first flight, and – to verify the qualification status of the vehicle 4000 during the subsequent ten years. – to resolve any technical problems relating to subsystem operations on the ground or in On-going qualification activities of a similar flight. nature were started for the Ariane-3 and 4 launchers in 1986, and for Ariane-5 in 1996. Before focussing on the European family of They can be classified into two main launchers, it is perhaps informative to review categories: ‘regular’ and ‘one-off’. just one or two of the US efforts in the area of solid and liquid propulsion in order to put the Ariane-3/4 accompanying activities Ariane-related activities into context. Regular activities These activities are mainly devoted to In principle, the development programme for a launcher ends with the verification of the qualification status of the qualification phase, after which it enters operational service. In various launcher subsystems. They include the practice, however, the assessment of a launcher’s reliability is a following work packages: continuing process and qualification-type activities proceed, as an – Periodic sampling of engines: one HM7 and extension of the development programme (as is done in aeronautics), one Viking per year, tested to the limits of the over the course of the vehicle’s lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Engine Data
    AEROSPACE ENGINE DATA Data for some concrete aerospace engines and their craft ................................................................................. 1 Data on rocket-engine types and comparison with large turbofans ................................................................... 1 Data on some large airliner engines ................................................................................................................... 2 Data on other aircraft engines and manufacturers .......................................................................................... 3 In this Appendix common to Aircraft propulsion and Space propulsion, data for thrust, weight, and specific fuel consumption, are presented for some different types of engines (Table 1), with some values of specific impulse and exit speed (Table 2), a plot of Mach number and specific impulse characteristic of different engine types (Fig. 1), and detailed characteristics of some modern turbofan engines, used in large airplanes (Table 3). DATA FOR SOME CONCRETE AEROSPACE ENGINES AND THEIR CRAFT Table 1. Thrust to weight ratio (F/W), for engines and their crafts, at take-off*, specific fuel consumption (TSFC), and initial and final mass of craft (intermediate values appear in [kN] when forces, and in tonnes [t] when masses). Engine Engine TSFC Whole craft Whole craft Whole craft mass, type thrust/weight (g/s)/kN type thrust/weight mini/mfin Trent 900 350/63=5.5 15.5 A380 4×350/5600=0.25 560/330=1.8 cruise 90/63=1.4 cruise 4×90/5000=0.1 CFM56-5A 110/23=4.8 16
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Design of ART-2B Rotor Blades
    August 2000 • NREL/SR-500-28473 NREL Advanced Research Turbine (ART) Aerodynamic Design of ART-2B Rotor Blades Dayton A. Griffin Global Energy Concepts, LLC Kirkland, Washington National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 August 2000 • NREL/SR-500-28473 NREL Advanced Research Turbine (ART) Aerodynamic Design of ART-2B Rotor Blades Dayton A. Griffin Global Energy Concepts, LLC Kirkland, Washington NREL Technical Monitor: Alan Laxson Prepared under Subcontract No. VAM-8-18208-01 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parametric Study of the Effect of the Leading- Edge Tubercles Geometry on the Performance of Aeronautic Propeller Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
    Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2018 Vol II WCE 2018, July 4-6, 2018, London, U.K. A Parametric Study of the Effect of the Leading- Edge Tubercles Geometry on the Performance of Aeronautic Propeller using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Fahad Rafi Butt, and Tariq Talha Index Terms—amplitude, counter-rotating chord-wise Abstract— Several researchers have highlighted the fact that vortex, flow separation, span-wise flow, tubercle, wavelength the leading-edge tubercles on the humpback whale flippers enhances its maneuverability. Encouraging results obtained due to implementation of the leading-edge tubercles on wings as I. INTRODUCTION well as wind and tidal turbine blades and the fact that a limited research has been conducted related to the implementation of N this study effect of leading-edge tubercle geometry on leading-edge tubercles onto the aeronautic propeller blades was I propeller efficiency over wide range of flight speeds and the motivation for the present study. A propeller that spins rotational velocities was analyzed. Tubercles are round efficiently through air would directly result in environmental bumps that change the aerodynamics of a lift producing friendly flights. Small sized aeronautic propeller; an 8x3.8 body, such as aeronautic wings [1]-[11], wind and tidal propeller, was considered for the present study. As a part of turbine blades [12]-[13] and marine propellers [14] by this study, numerical simulations were carried out to explore the effect of leading-edge tubercle geometry on propeller delaying flow separation. The tubercles also act as a wing efficiency. The tubercle geometry was varied systematically by fence reducing both the span-wise flow and wing tip vortices changing the tubercle amplitude and wavelength.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140002716 2019-08-29T14:36:45+00:00Z Liquid Propulsion Systems – Evolution & Advancements Launch Vehicle Propulsion & Systems LPTC Liquid Propulsion Technical Committee Rick Ballard Liquid Engine Systems Lead SLS Liquid Engines Office NASA / MSFC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted, unless for course participation and to a paid course student, in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of AIAA and/or course instructor. Contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Professional Development Program, Suite 500, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4344 Modules 1. Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2. LRE Applications 3. Liquid Propellants 4. Engine Power Cycles 5. Engine Components Module 1: Rocket Propulsion TOPICS Fundamentals • Thrust • Specific Impulse • Mixture Ratio • Isp vs. MR • Density vs. Isp • Propellant Mass vs. Volume Warning: Contents deal with math, • Area Ratio physics and thermodynamics. Be afraid…be very afraid… Terms A Area a Acceleration F Force (thrust) g Gravity constant (32.2 ft/sec2) I Impulse m Mass P Pressure Subscripts t Time a Ambient T Temperature c Chamber e Exit V Velocity o Initial state r Reaction ∆ Delta / Difference s Stagnation sp Specific ε Area Ratio t Throat or Total γ Ratio of specific heats Thrust (1/3) Rocket thrust can be explained using Newton’s 2nd and 3rd laws of motion. 2nd Law: a force applied to a body is equal to the mass of the body and its acceleration in the direction of the force.
    [Show full text]
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Reliable Performance Gas Generator of 75 Tonf-Class Liquid Rocket Engine for the Korea Space Launch Vehicle II
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-521 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND SPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) Development of a Reliable Performance Gas Generator of 75 tonf-class Liquid Rocket Engine for the Korea Space Launch Vehicle II Byoungjik Lim*, Munki Kim*, Donghyuk Kang*, Hyeon-Jun Kim*, Jong-Gyu Kim*, and Hwan-Seok Choi* *Korea Aerospace Research Institute 169-84, Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-Gu Daejeon, 34133, South Korea [email protected] Abstract In this paper, development history and result of a reliable performance gas generator of 75 tonf-class liquid rocket engine is described. Based on the experience acquired from the 30 tonf-class gas generator development, the almost identical concept was adopted to 75 tonf-class gas generator such as a coaxial swirl injector and a regeneratively cooled combustion chamber. During the entire development process using the full-scale and subscale technological demonstration model and development model up to now, combustion tests of over 430 times and cumulative time of over 17 700 seconds have been carried out for a 75 tonf-class gas generate. Now the 75 tonf-class fuel-rich gas generator shows very reliable and reproducible characteristics throughout the entire lifetime including the flight test which was done with the test launch vehicle in November 2018. Thus, it can be said that the development of a 75 tonf-class fuel rich gas generator which will be used in Korea first independent space launch vehicle, KSLV-II was finished successfully. 1. Introduction As a leading institute for technology which is related with space launch vehicle and a national space development agency in the Republic of KOREA, the Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI) has been continuously researching and developing technology related to space launch vehicles since establishment in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Chemical-Nuclear Propulsion MAE 342 2016
    2/12/20 Chemical/Nuclear Propulsion Space System Design, MAE 342, Princeton University Robert Stengel • Thermal rockets • Performance parameters • Propellants and propellant storage Copyright 2016 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only. http://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/MAE342.html 1 1 Chemical (Thermal) Rockets • Liquid/Gas Propellant –Monopropellant • Cold gas • Catalytic decomposition –Bipropellant • Separate oxidizer and fuel • Hypergolic (spontaneous) • Solid Propellant ignition –Mixed oxidizer and fuel • External ignition –External ignition • Storage –Burn to completion – Ambient temperature and pressure • Hybrid Propellant – Cryogenic –Liquid oxidizer, solid fuel – Pressurized tank –Throttlable –Throttlable –Start/stop cycling –Start/stop cycling 2 2 1 2/12/20 Cold Gas Thruster (used with inert gas) Moog Divert/Attitude Thruster and Valve 3 3 Monopropellant Hydrazine Thruster Aerojet Rocketdyne • Catalytic decomposition produces thrust • Reliable • Low performance • Toxic 4 4 2 2/12/20 Bi-Propellant Rocket Motor Thrust / Motor Weight ~ 70:1 5 5 Hypergolic, Storable Liquid- Propellant Thruster Titan 2 • Spontaneous combustion • Reliable • Corrosive, toxic 6 6 3 2/12/20 Pressure-Fed and Turbopump Engine Cycles Pressure-Fed Gas-Generator Rocket Rocket Cycle Cycle, with Nozzle Cooling 7 7 Staged Combustion Engine Cycles Staged Combustion Full-Flow Staged Rocket Cycle Combustion Rocket Cycle 8 8 4 2/12/20 German V-2 Rocket Motor, Fuel Injectors, and Turbopump 9 9 Combustion Chamber Injectors 10 10 5 2/12/20
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in HTPB/Ammonium Nitrate Mixed
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 12-2016 Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in TPB/H Ammonium Nitrate Mixed Hybrid Rocket Systems Jacob Ward Forsyth Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the Propulsion and Power Commons Recommended Citation Forsyth, Jacob Ward, "Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in TPB/AmmoniumH Nitrate Mixed Hybrid Rocket Systems" (2016). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 876. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/876 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENHANCEMENT OF VOLUMETRIC SPECIFIC IMPULSE IN HTPB/AMMONIUM NITRATE MIXED HYBRID ROCKET SYSTEMS by Jacob W. Forsyth A report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Aerospace Engineering Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Stephen A. Whitmore Ph.D. David Geller Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ Rees Fullmer Ph.D. Committee Member UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2016 ii Copyright © Jacob W. Forsyth 2016 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in HTPB/Ammonium Nitrate Mixed Hybrid Rocket Systems by Jacob W. Forsyth, Master of Science Utah State University, 2016 Major Professor: Dr. Stephen A. Whitmore Department: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Hybrid rocket systems are safer and have higher specific impulse than solid rockets. However, due to large oxidizer tanks and low regression rates, hybrid rockets have low volumetric efficiency and very long longitudinal profiles, which limit many of the applications for which hybrids can be used.
    [Show full text]