DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Works and Utilities Committee 2807

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

7 Sep 2017 Public Works and Utilities Committee 2807 Mr COSTIGAN: I rise to a point of order. The honourable is talking about this government not selling ports. Madam DEPUTY SPEAKER (Ms Farmer): Order! Do you have a point of order, member for Whitsunday? Mr COSTIGAN: I think the member is misleading the House. Madam DEPUTY SPEAKER: If you feel so, you can write to the Speaker. Mr COSTIGAN: I will. Madam DEPUTY SPEAKER: Member for Lockyer, did you have a point of order? Mr RICKUSS: My point of order was that the member is misleading the House. The Labor government sold the Brisbane port. Madam DEPUTY SPEAKER: If you feel that is the case, you can write to the Speaker. Mr KING: I reiterate that the Palaszczuk government does not sell ports; all the previous government wanted to do was to sell our ports. We are investing in our ports by keeping our government owned corporations in public hands so that they can continue to work for the public. Queensland government owned ports provide— Honourable members interjected. Madam DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order! It would be almost impossible for Hansard to hear the member for Kallangur. Would everyone please allow the member for Kallangur to speak? Mr KING: Thank you for your protection, Madam Deputy Speaker. I appreciate it. Queensland government owned ports provide a central role in the facilitation of trade, which creates jobs, mostly in our regions, and investment in the Queensland economy. I will not say too much more, except that we are investing. I notice that the member opposite said that some money would be well spent on the port of Mackay. The North Queensland Bulk Ports Corporation will spend $7 million on wharfs 4 and 5 fender upgrades at the port of Mackay and a further $2.9 million to complete the Port of Abbot Point module offloading facility. We are investing in our ports and we are keeping them in government hands. Question put—That the motion be agreed to. Motion agreed to. PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES COMMITTEE Report, Motion to Take Note Mr KING (Kallangur—ALP) (12.14 pm): I move— That the House take note of the Public Works and Utilities Committee report No. 40 titled Auditor-General report to parliament 7: 2016-17 water: 2015-16 results of financial audits, tabled 31 May 2017. On behalf of the committee, I thank the committee secretariat and the Queensland Audit Office for their assistance with our consideration of the report. I also thank the committee members for their work during our examination of the report. The Queensland Audit Office's audit found that all our GOCs are financially sustainable. There is a ripple in Seqwater, but they do have a planned path to address that financial position in a way that is fair and sustainable. As we know, Seqwater is the owner of the South-East Queensland Water Grid, which has drought proofed South-East Queensland through strategic investments in large-scale water infrastructure during the millennium drought. During a different examination, our committee visited some of those facilities. We saw the investment that has saved us several times. It is because of the Labor government's investment in climate-resilient water sources and the Water Grid that South-East Queensland was better able to respond when poor summer rainfall left some of the region's dams in worse shape than others. When we have disasters in this area, such as ex-tropical cyclone Debbie, water treatment plants can go down, pounded by high rainfall events. As we saw during our visit, the Gold Coast desalination plant does not have any rust, as those opposite like to say. There is no rust whatsoever and there never was, except during construction. The Gold Coast desalination plant kicked into gear and was running at 100 per cent capacity to ensure that water supply was maintained. By building one of Australia's first water grids, we now have the flexibility to change supply sources when we need to and move drinking water across our region. Those investments ensure the 2808 Public Works and Utilities Committee 7 Sep 2017 south-east always has a reliable high-quality water supply. I note that the member for Southport was a big advocate for the desalination plant when we were down there. He loved it. Seqwater is on a price path, set by the Queensland Competition Authority, to reach a sustainable and fair bulk water price to pay down those investments, which have proven to be highly valuable to our state again and again. I am pleased to report that Seqwater has developed and implemented enhanced financial government practices to address the QAO's other findings. Mr MOLHOEK (Southport—LNP) (12.17 pm): I rise to also speak to report No. 40 from the Public Works and Utilities Committee in reference to the Auditor-General's report to parliament No. 7 for 2016-17 on water in 2015-16 and the results of financial audits. This report highlights the fact that the figures reported by the various water entities were accurate. However, it does not accurately portray what an absolute mess Labor has made of our water assets and our borrowings across the state of Queensland. As the member for Kallangur rightly pointed out, as a councillor with the Gold Coast City Council I was a supporter of the desalination plant at the height of the drought. The first proposal council had was to build a small desalination plant for emergency water backup at a cost of about $300 million. Then suddenly there was a looming election and the state government was in a panic because they had no answers to solve the water problems of South-East Queensland. A letter arrived from Peter Beattie's office, telling the Gold Coast City Council that they will take over the control of the desalination plant and reimburse the Gold Coast council for the money that had been spent on land acquisitions in preparation. It went from a $300 million project to about a $1.6 billion project. 018 What do we have now? We have a desalination plant that is over capacity, has been over speced and has been built at a level that was absolutely unsustainable and unnecessary. That is what Labor does. We heard from the member for Yeerongpilly, Mark Bailey, a little earlier. He accused the LNP of a lack of policy development. The policy that they have developed with regard to energy is building solar panel farms all over Queensland when we are one of the largest miners of coal and one of the cleanest generators of coal-fired power in the southern hemisphere, if not the world. Mr KING: I rise to a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. I seek your guidance, Madam Deputy Speaker. We are talking about water assets not solar panels. Madam DEPUTY SPEAKER (Ms Farmer): I did not hear what the member was saying, but I would ask you to remain relevant. Mr MOLHOEK: The accusation was that the LNP has no credibility in terms of policy development. I just wanted to point out that importing more solar panels from China is not necessarily going to create jobs in Queensland. That is classic ‘Labornomics'. One of the questions that the committee asked the Audit Office was whether they could supply a schedule that provided some detail around the extent of borrowings, the amount of money that was being spent on maintenance and what the current policy direction was of the government. Again, as we saw with the energy audit report and the figures provided in an answer to a question on notice then, the figures for maintenance came through reading ‘Not disclosed. Not disclosed. Not disclosed. Not disclosed.' My question to the government is: what are they trying to hide? I know what they are trying to hide. They are trying to hide the fact that they have raided the water entities of money to prop up their budget. What we heard from the Audit Office was that debt amongst the water entities is now at $13.6 billion. The debt has not gone down. We would have thought that it might have gone down, but it has actually gone up again. The Audit Office said that this represents nine per cent of total state debt. They expressed concerns around some of the government policy. They went on to state— ... there was one significant or high-risk matter identified and this related to inadequate control processes at Seqwater relating to asset valuation. ... Our report also highlighted the returns to government from this sector and sustainability challenges faced by the water entity in Queensland. These include profits and retained earnings for 2015-16 supported the dividends and participation returns ... There was $169 million taken out of the water entities. There was another $130 million taken as a special dividend and then another $130 million taken as a share capital return. This is chipping away at the reserves of those water entities at a time when they should have been looking to pay off debt and at a time when they should have been looking to service the debt rather than pulling more money into the state coffers to prop up their appalling budget. There is so much more I could say on this issue. 7 Sep 2017 Public Works and Utilities Committee 2809 Ms PEASE (Lytton—ALP) (12.23 pm): I rise to speak to the Public Works and Utilities Committee's report on its inquiry into Auditor-General report to parliament No.
Recommended publications
  • WQ1251 - Pioneer River and Plane Creek Basins Downs Mine Dam K ! R E Em E ! ! E T

    WQ1251 - Pioneer River and Plane Creek Basins Downs Mine Dam K ! R E Em E ! ! E T

    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! %2 ! ! ! ! ! 148°30'E 148°40'E 148°50'E 149°E 149°10'E 149°20'E 149°30'E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ° k k 1 e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! re C 2 se C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! as y ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! M y k S ! C a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ° r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! r Mackay City estuarine 1 %2 Proserpine River Sunset 2 a u ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e M waters (outside port land) ! m ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bay O k Basin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! F C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n Bucasia ! Upper Cattle Creek c Dalr
  • Emergency Management of Sunwater's Dam Portfolio in The

    Emergency Management of Sunwater's Dam Portfolio in The

    Emergency management of SunWater’s dam portfolio in the 2010-11 Queensland floods Robert Keogh, Rob Ayre, Peter Richardson, Barry Jeppesen, Olga Kakourakis SunWater Limited SunWater owns 23 referable dams and operates a further two dams for other owners. The dams are located across Queensland from Texas and St George in the South to the Atherton Tablelands in the north to Mt Isa in the west. During the period December 2010 to February 2011 there were several significant rainfall events across Queensland. The first occurred in late December 2010, the second in mid January 2011 and third in early February 2011. Generally it was the most significant rainfall event in Queensland since the 1970’s. 22 Emergency Action Plans were activated simultaneously by SunWater. Eleven dams experienced a flood of record during the events. This paper will discuss what has been learnt from these events including the optimisation of management structures for a dam owner with a large portfolio of dams: review of O&M Manuals including the adequacy of backup systems: relationships with the State disaster management framework: the value of rigorous communication protocols: managing fear and a general lack of understanding in the community: and the value of being prepared. Keywords: Emergency Management, Floods, . In addition to the dams SunWater owns, the following 1 Background storages are managed under facility management SunWater and its subsidiary company Burnett Water Pty contracts: Ltd own 231 referable storages consisting of 18 Category 2 Glenlyon Dam – (Category 2 dam) for the Border 2 dams and 5 Category 1 dams under the Water Supply Rivers Commission (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008 and Water Act 2000.
  • Strategic Framework December 2019 CS9570 12/19

    Strategic Framework December 2019 CS9570 12/19

    Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy Queensland bulk water opportunities statement Part A – Strategic framework December 2019 CS9570 12/19 Front cover image: Chinaman Creek Dam Back cover image: Copperlode Falls Dam © State of Queensland, 2019 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Hinze Dam Queensland bulk water opportunities statement Contents Figures, insets and tables .....................................................................iv 1. Introduction .............................................................................1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Context 1 1.3 Current scope 2 1.4 Objectives and principles 3 1.5 Objectives 3 1.6 Principles guiding Queensland Government investment 5 1.7 Summary of initiatives 9 2. Background and current considerations ....................................................11 2.1 History of bulk water in Queensland 11 2.2 Current policy environment 12 2.3 Planning complexity 13 2.4 Drivers of bulk water use 13 3.
  • Rural Irrigation Price Review 2020–24 Part A: Overview

    Rural Irrigation Price Review 2020–24 Part A: Overview

    Final report Rural irrigation price review 2020–24 Part A: Overview January 2020 © Queensland Competition Authority 2020 The Queensland Competition Authority supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this document. The Queensland Competition Authority has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright2 and this material remains unaltered. Queensland Competition Authority Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III Scope of our review iii Approach iii Prices iii Revenue and cost risks v Approach to apportioning dam safety upgrade capex v Costs vi Recommendations vi 1 OVERVIEW OF OUR APPROACH 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Referral 1 1.3 Irrigation services 2 1.4 Key regulatory obligations 3 1.5 Our approach to the investigation and recommending prices 3 1.6 Review process 5 2 PRICING FRAMEWORK 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 Scope of our investigation 6 2.3 Matters we are required to consider in undertaking our investigation 9 2.4 Approach 10 2.5 Stakeholders' submissions 10 2.6 Relevant matters for this investigation 11 2.7 Approach to bill moderation and the transition to lower bound prices 22 2.8 Summary of approach to relevant matters 23 3 RISK AND THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 24 3.1 Background 24 3.2 Revenue risk 27 3.3 Cost risk 33 4 APPORTIONING DAM SAFETY UPGRADE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 44 4.1 Overview 44 4.2 Dam safety compliance obligations 46 4.3 Recent developments and drivers of dam safety upgrades
  • Kinchant Dam Fish Attraction Plan 2018-20

    Kinchant Dam Fish Attraction Plan 2018-20

    Kinchant Dam Fish Attraction Plan 2018-20 April 2018 DRAFT FOR COMMENT This publication has been compiled by Andrew Norris of Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Table of contents Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Kinchant Dam .......................................................................................................................................
  • Schedule of Speed Limits in Queensland

    Schedule of Speed Limits in Queensland

    Schedule of speed limits in Queensland Description of area Speed Ships affected Date gazetted 1. The waters of all canals (unless otherwise prescribed) 6 knots All 21 May 2004 2. The waters of all boat harbours and marinas 6 knots All 21 May 2004 3. Smooth water limits (unless otherwise prescribed) 40 knots All 21 May 2004 Hire and drive personal 4. All Queensland waters 30 knots 27 May 2011 watercraft 5. Areas exempted from speed limit Note: this only applies if item 3 is the only valid speed limit for an area (a) the waters of Perserverance Dam, via Toowoomba Unlimited All 21 May 2004 (b) the waters of the Bjelke Peterson Dam at Murgon Unlimited All 21 May 2004 (c) the waters locally known as Sandy Hook Reach approximately Unlimited All 17 August 2010 between Branyan and Tyson Crossing on the Burnett River (d) the waters upstream of the Barrage on the Fitzroy River Unlimited All 21 May 2004 (e) the waters of Peter Faust Dam at Proserpine Unlimited All 21 May 2004 (f) the waters of Ross Dam at Townsville Unlimited All 9 October 2013 (g) the waters of Tinaroo Dam in the Atherton Tableland (unless Unlimited All 21 May 2004 otherwise prescribed) (h) the waters of Trinity Inlet in front of the Esplanade at Cairns Unlimited All 21 May 2004 (i) the waters of Marian Weir Unlimited All 21 May 2004 (j) the waters of Plantation Creek known as Hutchings Lagoon Unlimited All 21 May 2004 (k) the waters in Kinchant Dam at Mackay Unlimited All 21 May 2004 (l) the waters of Lake Maraboon at Emerald Unlimited All 6 May 2005 (m) the waters of Bundoora Dam, Middlemount 6 knots All 20 May 2016 6.
  • Whitsunday Scenic Amenity Study

    Whitsunday Scenic Amenity Study

    Scenic Amenity Study Whitsunday RegionRegion ScenicScenic Amenity Amenity Study Study WE15037 WE15037 Scenic Amenity Study Prepared for Whitsunday Regional Council March 2017 Scenic Amenity Study Whitsunday Region Scenic Amenity Study Contact Information Document Information Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd Prepared for Whitsunday Regional ABN 57 051 074 992 Council Project Name Whitsunday Region Scenic Level 11 Green Square North Tower Amenity Study 515 St Paul’s Terrace File Reference Q:\WE Jobs Locked Bag 4006 2015\WE15037 Fortitude Valley Qld 4006 Job Reference WE15037 Telephone: 07 3369 9822 Date March 2017 Facsimile: 07 3369 9722 International: +61 7 3369 9822 [email protected] www.cardno.com.au Author(s): Tania Metcher Landscape Architect Craig Wilson Effective Date March 2017 Senior GIS Analyst Approved By: Date Approved: March 2017 Alan Chenoweth Senior Consultant Document Control Description of Author Reviewed Date Revision Signature Signature Version Author Initials Reviewer Initials A 16 February Draft TM AC 1 16 March Final for review TM AC © Cardno 2016. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document.
  • Sunwater Dams Sunwater Makes a Significant Contribution to the Rural, Industrial, Energy, Mining and Urban Development of Queensland by Providing Water Solutions

    Sunwater Dams Sunwater Makes a Significant Contribution to the Rural, Industrial, Energy, Mining and Urban Development of Queensland by Providing Water Solutions

    SunWater Dams SunWater makes a significant contribution to the rural, industrial, energy, mining and urban development of Queensland by providing water solutions. Over the past 80 years, SunWater has designed and managed the construction of 30 of Queensland’s dams, 82 weirs and barrages, 39 reservoirs and balancing storages and rural and bulk water infrastructure systems. Currently, SunWater owns and manages 19 dams in Queensland and each dam has been strategically built in existing river, stream or creek locations to serve the needs of the region. A dam is a critical component of a water supply scheme which can be made up of weirs and barrages, pumping stations, pipelines and channels, and drains. The overall scheme is designed to supply water for various purposes including town water supply, irrigation, electricity production, industrial i.e. power stations, mines, stock and groundwater supply. Water Supply Scheme Pipeline Industrial & Mining Dam Drain Pumping Station Channel Legend Balancing Storage SunWater Infrastructure Purpose of Water Supply Weir Irrigation Town Barrage Water Supply Dam Types The type of dam is defined by how the dam wall was constructed. Depending on the surrounding environment, SunWater dams can be described as one or more Scheme of the following: Pipeline Cania Dam Boondooma Dam Wuruma Dam Paradise Dam Julius Dam EMBANKMENT CONCRETE FACED MASS CONCRETE ROLLER COMPACTED MULTIPLE ARCH Industrial & Mining ROCKFILL GRAVITY CONCRETE GRAVITY CONCRETE Constructed as an Constructed as an BUTTRESS embankment of well Constructed using a Constructed in horizontal embankment of compacted Constructed as concrete compacted clay (earthfill) some large volume of layers of dryer than normal free-draining granular earth horizontal arches supported with rock on the faces (rockfill).
  • 2012-17 Volume 2 Proserpine River Water Supply Scheme

    2012-17 Volume 2 Proserpine River Water Supply Scheme

    Final Report SunWater Irrigation Price Review: 2012-17 Volume 2 Proserpine River Water Supply Scheme April 2012 Level 19, 12 Creek Street Brisbane Queensland 4000 GPO Box 2257 Brisbane Qld 4001 Telephone (07) 3222 0555 Facsimile (07) 3222 0599 [email protected] www.qca.org.au © Queensland Competition Authority 2012 The Queensland Competition Authority supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this document. The Queensland Competition Authority has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered. Queensland Competition Authority Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE GLOSSARY III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IV 1. PROSERPINE RIVER WATER SUPPLY SCHEME 1 1.1 Scheme Description 1 1.2 Bulk Water Infrastructure 1 1.3 Network Service Plan 2 1.4 Consultation 3 2. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Draft Report 4 2.3 Submissions Received from Stakeholders on the Draft Report 6 2.4 Authority’s Response to Submissions Received on the Draft Report 6 3. PRICING FRAMEWORK 7 3.1 Tariff Structure 7 3.2 Water Use Forecasts 8 3.3 Tariff Groups 9 3.4 Kelsey Creek Water Board 10 3.5 Storage Rental Fees 10 4. RENEWALS ANNUITY 11 4.1 Background 11 4.2 SunWater’s Opening ARR Balance (1 July 2006) 12 4.3 Past Renewals Expenditure 13 4.4 Opening ARR Balance (at 1 July 2012) 16 4.5 Forecast Renewals Expenditure 17 4.6 SunWater’s Consultation with Customers 24 4.7 Allocation of Headworks Renewals Costs According to WAE Priority 25 4.8 Calculating the Renewals Annuity 29 5.
  • Apportionment of Dam Safety Upgrade Costs

    Apportionment of Dam Safety Upgrade Costs

    Consultation paper Rural irrigation price review 2020–24: apportionment of dam safety upgrade costs October 2018 © Queensland Competition Authority 2018 The Queensland Competition Authority supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this document. The Queensland Competition Authority has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright2 and this material remains unaltered. Queensland Competition Authority Contents SUBMISSIONS Closing date for submissions: 22 February 2019 Public involvement is an important element of the decision-making processes of the Queensland Competition Authority (QCA). Therefore submissions are invited from interested parties concerning it developing and applying an appropriate approach for apportioning dam safety upgrade capital expenditure as part of the review of irrigation prices for 2020–24. The QCA will take account of all submissions received within the stated timeframes. Submissions, comments or inquiries regarding this paper should be directed to: Queensland Competition Authority GPO Box 2257 Brisbane Q 4001 Tel (07) 3222 0555 Fax (07) 3222 0599 www.qca.org.au/submissions Confidentiality In the interests of transparency and to promote informed discussion and consultation, the QCA intends to make all submissions publicly available. However, if a person making a submission believes that information in the submission is confidential, that person should claim confidentiality in respect of the document (or the relevant part of the document) at the time the submission is given to the QCA and state the basis for the confidentiality claim. The assessment of confidentiality claims will be made by the QCA in accordance with the Queensland Competition Authority Act 1997, including an assessment of whether disclosure of the information would damage the person’s commercial activities and considerations of the public interest.
  • Minimising the Risk of Spread of Mimosa Pigra from Peter Faust Dam

    Minimising the Risk of Spread of Mimosa Pigra from Peter Faust Dam

    Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries Minimising the risk of spread of Mimosa pigra from Peter Faust Dam, Proserpine Edward Attard, Cassandra Chopping, Peter Austin, Jason Williams and Tony Pople � Final report to the Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries and the Department of Environment and Heritage May 2006 Edward Attard and Tony Pople Land Protection, Department of Natural Resources and Water GPO Box 2454, Brisbane Qld 4001 Cassandra Chopping and Peter Austin Land Protection, Department of Natural Resources and Water PO Box 63, Mackay Qld 4740 Jason Williams SunWater, 126 Giddy Road PMB 5013, Ayr Qld 4807 Published by: � ©State of Queensland (Department of Natural Resources and Water) 2006 � ii Risk of Mimosa pigra spread in Queensland � Contents Summary and recommendations v � Section 1–Overview of Mimosa pigra ecology, distribution, impacts and management 1 � 1.1 General introduction 1 � 1.2 Global distribution and history of introduction to Australia 2 � 1.3 M. pigra life history 2 � 1.4 Potential distribution in Australia 4 � 1.5 Current and potential impacts in Australia and overseas 4 � 1.6 Control options and cost 4 � Section 2–Management of Mimosa pigra in Queensland 5 � 2.1 Introduction 5 � 2.2 State wide strategy 6 � 2.3 Management of M. pigra at Peter Faust Dam 6 � 2.4 Research on M. pigra in Queensland 11 � 2.5 Key stakeholders and their responsibilites 11 � Section 3–Assessing the risk of Mimosa pigra spread from Peter Faust Dam 13 � 3.1 Introduction 13 � 3.2 Methods 13 � 3.3 Vectors of seed spread 17 � 3.4 Management options 21 � 3.5 Ranking management options 25 � 3.6 Making management decisions 27 � 3.7 Monitoring and performance evaluation 27 � Acknowledgments 28 � References 29 � Appendixes 31 � Risk of Mimosa pigra spread in Queensland � iii iv Risk of Mimosa pigra spread in Queensland � Summary and A number of preliminary recommendations can be drawn from this risk assessment: recommendations Monitoring and control In February 2001 the first infestation (~100 plants) 1.
  • Delivering Today Securing Tomorrow

    Delivering Today Securing Tomorrow

    DELIVERING TODAY SECURING TOMORROW ANNUAL REPORT 2009–10 CONTENTS 2 Corporate Profile 24 Community 4 CEO’s Review 26 Our Leaders and Our People 6 Chairman’s Outlook 34 Corporate Governance 8 Financial Summary 42 Financial Report 12 Performance Summary 68 Statement of Corporate Intent Summary 14 Delivering Today 72 Key Statistics 16 Securing Tomorrow 81 SunWater Scheme Map 20 Environment 22 Safety Communication Objective This annual report aims to provide accurate information to meet the needs of SunWater This annual report is a summary of programs and stakeholders. SunWater is committed to open activities undertaken to meet key performance and accountable governance and welcomes your indicators as set out in SunWater’s Statement of feedback on this report. Corporate Intent 2009–10 (SCI) and summarised on page 68 of this report. The annual report can be accessed on SunWater’s website: www.sunwater.com.au. The report chronicles the performance of the organisation and describes SunWater’s Hard copies are also available on request: initiatives, achievements and the organisation’s SunWater future plans and prospects as a leader in water PO Box 15536 City East, Brisbane QLD 4002 infrastructure development and management. Ph: +61 7 3120 0000 Fax: +61 7 3120 0260 It also communicates significant events impacting SunWater Limited is a registered water service the organisation that have occurred after the provider under the Water Act 2000. reporting period. www.sunwater.com.au HIGHLIGHTS DELIVERING TODAY 1,347,339ML of water was delivered by SunWater