DOCSLIB.ORG

78 Stat. 1 Public Law 88-390-Aug

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
78 Stat. 1 Public Law 88-390-Aug 78 STAT. 1 PUBLIC LAW 88-390-AUG. 1, 1964 ^41 Public Law 88-390 AN ACT August 1, 1964 To authorize certain construction at military installations, and for other [H. R. 10300] purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ st^ctlon^Aut'h^r- ization Act, 1965. TITLE 1 SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish o^ develop mili- ^'^^• tary installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL ARMY COMMAND (First Army) Fort Deveiis, Massachusetts: Community facilities, $681,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Hospital facilities, and troop housing, $16,225,000. Fort Hamilton, New York: Utilities, $118,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Operational and training facilities, adminis­ trative facilities, troop housing and utilities, $3,564,000. Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania: Operational and training facili­ ties, and troop housing, $5,244,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Troop housing and utilities, $7,778,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Training facilities, $2,900,000. Fort George G. Meade, Maryland: Troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $2,084,000. Fort Ritchie, Maryland: Operational facilities, $1,600,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Operational facilities, and administrative facilities, $5,452,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina: Troop housing and community facilities,-$5,655,000. Fort Gordon, Georgia: Training facilities, and troop housing, $13,968,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina: Training facilities, and troop hous­ ing, $15,383,000. Fort Rucker, Alabama: Training facilities, and troop housing, $2,994,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia: Training facilities, and maintenance facilities, $627,000. (Fourth Army) Fort Bliss, Texas: Operational facilities, community facilities, and utilities, $721,000. Fort Hood, Texas: Maintenance facilities, supply facilities, and troop housing, $11,726,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas: Administrative facilities, $396,000. 342 PUBLIC LAW 88-390-AUG. 1, 1964 [78 STAT. Fort Polk, Louisiana: Troop housing, $627,000. Fort Sill, Oklahoma: Maintenance facilities, supply facilities, troop housing and utilities, $3,207,000. (Fifth Army) Fort Carson, Colorado: Maintenance facilities, supply facilities, troop housing, and real estate, $18,256,000. Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana: Troop housing, $1,652,000. F'ort Leavenworth, Kansas: Administrative facilities, $352,000. Fort Riley, Kansas: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, troop housing, and real estate, $18,692,000. Fort Sheridan, Illinois: Medical facilities, administrative facilities, and utilities, $5,544,000. Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, medical facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $16,679,000. (Sixth Army) Fort Irwin, California: Troop housing, $2,643,000. Fort Lewis, Washington: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, and troop housing, $1,906,000. Presidio of Monterey, California: Training facilities, $194,000. Fort Ord, California: Troop housing, $777,000. Presidio of San Francisco, California: Utilities, $283,000. Yakima Training Center, Washington: Training facilities, $303,000. (Military District of Washington, District of Columbia) Fort McNair, District of Columbia: Training facilities, $1,550,000. Fort Myer, Virginia: Medical facilities, and troop housing, $4,052,000. UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (United States Army Missile Command) Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Research, development and test f acili- ties, and utilities, $2,389,000. (United States Army Munitions Command) Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: Research, development and test fa­ cilities, and medical facilities, $6,843,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Production facilities, $365,000. Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Colorado: Administrative facilities, $29,000. (United States Army Supply and Maintenance Command) Aeronautical Maintenance Center, Texas: Maintenance facilities, $888,000. Letterkenny Army Depot, Pennsylvfiiiia: Utilities, $43,000. Oakland Army Terminal, California: Operational facilities, ad­ ministrative facilities, and utilities, $1,1x7,000. Savanna Army Depot, Illinois: Supply facilities, $446,000. Sierra Army Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $590,000. Sunny Point Army Terminal, North Carolina: Utilities, $131,000. 78 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 88-390-AUG. 1, 1964 343 (United States Army Test and Evaluation Command) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Operational facilities, re­ search, development and test facilities, $784,000. Fort Huachuca, Arizona: Hospital facilities, and utilities, $4,635,000. White Sands Missile Kange, New Mexico: Kesearch, development and test facilities, $2,685,000. (United States Army Weapons Command) Watervliet Arsenal, New York: Utilities, $77,000. TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Signal Corps) East Coast Eadio Keceiving Station, La Plata, Maryland: Utilities, $93,000. East Coast Relay Station, Frederick, Maryland: Troop housing, $257,000. Army Pictorial Center, New York: Operational facilities and pro­ duction facilities, $1,120,000. West Coast Radio Receiving Station, Santa Rosa, California: Utilities, $76,000. (Medical Service) Brooke Army Medical Center, Texas: Operational facilities, $104,- 000. Letterman General Hospital, California: Hospital facilities, $14,305,000. Walter Reed Army Medical Center, District of Columbia: Train­ ing facilities, and utilities, $1,019,000. UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Opera­ tional and training facilities, admmistrative facilities, cadet housing, community facilities and utilities, $20,578,000. ARMY SECURITY AGENCY Two Rock Ranch Station, California: OiDerational facilities, $1,014,000. Vint Hill Farms Station, Virginia: Operational facilities, $997,000. ARMY COMPONENT COMMANDS (United States Army Air Defense Command) Various locations: Operational facilities and troop housing, $646,000. (Alaska Command Area) Fort Richardson, Alaska: Operational facilities, maintenance facil­ ities, and administrative facilities, $767,000. Fort J. M. Wainwright, Alaska: Maintenance facilities, troop hous­ ing, and utilities, $743,000. 31-667 0-65—25 344 PUBLIC LAW 88-390-AUG. 1, 1964 [78 STAT. (Pacific Command Area) Aliamanu Military Reservation, Hawaii: Utilities, $247,000. Schofield Barracks, Hawaii: Operational facilities, maintenance facilities, and administrative facilities, $3,235,000. Fort Shafter, Hawaii: Administrative facilities and utilities, $1,370,000. Tripler Army Hospital, Hawaii: Medical facilities, $100,000. OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (United States Army Missile Command) Kwajalein Island: Research, development and test facilities, hos­ pital facilities, and troop housing, $32,119,000. ARMY SECURITY AGENCY Various locations: Operational facilities, $5,662,000. ARMY COMPONENT COMMAND (Pacific Command Area) Korea: Operational facilities, maintenance facilities, supply facilities, troop housing and utilities, $8,509,000. Okinawa, various: Utilities, $1,064,000. Taiwan: Utilities, $26,000. (European Command Area) Germany: Operational facilities, and maintenance facilities, $3,252,000. (United States Army Forces Southern Command) Fort Kobbe, Canal Zone: Troop housing, $343,000. Quarry Heights, Canal Zone: Utilities, $86,000. Construction for SEC. 102. Any of the authority in title I of this Act may be utilized unforeseen re­ quirements. for the establishment or development of Army installations and facilities made necessary by changes in Army missions and respon­ sibilities which have been occasioned by: (a) unforeseen security considerations, (b) new weapons developments, (c) new and unfore­ seen research and development requirements, or (d) improved pro­ duction schedules, if the Secretary of Defense determines that deferral of such construction for inclusion in the next military construction authorization Act would be inconsistent with interest of national security, and in connection therewith to acquire, construct, convert, rehabilitate, or install permanent or temporary public works, including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, Limitation. and equipment: Provided^ That the total cost of projects constructed Notification of under this section shall not exceed $17,500,000: And provided further, congressional committees. That the Secretary of the Army, or his designee, shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Repre­ sentatives, immediately upon reaching a final decision to implement, of the cost of construction of any public work undertaken under this section, including those real estate actions pertaining thereto. This authorization will expire as of September 30, 1965, except for those 78 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 88-390-AUG. 1, 1964 345 public works projects concerning which the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives have been notified pursuant to this section prior to that date. SEC. 103. (a) Public Law 88-174 is amended under heading "Inside the L^nited States" in section 101, as follows: ^^ ^*^*' ^°^- (1) Under the heading "ARMY COMPONENT COMMANDS" and under the subheading "PACIFIC COMMAND AREA", with respect to "Fort Shafter, Hawaii", strike out "$74,000" and insert in place thereof "$91,000". (b) Public Law 88-174 is amended by striking out in clause (1) of section 602 "$154,976,000",
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 Be It Enacted Hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the ^^"'^'/Or^ C ^ United States Of
    324 PUBLIC LAW 161-JULY 15, 1955 [69 STAT. Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 July 15.1955 AN ACT THa R 68291 *• * To authorize certain construction at inilitai-y, naval, and Air F<n"ce installations, and for otlier purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the an^^"'^'/ord Air Forc^e conc^> United States of America in Congress assembled^ struction TITLE I ^'"^" SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army is authorized to establish or develop military installations and facilities by the acquisition, con­ struction, conversion, rehabilitation, or installation of permanent or temporary public works in respect of the following projects, which include site preparation, appurtenances, and related utilities and equipment: CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Troop housing, community facilities, utilities, and family housing, $1,736,000. Black Hills Ordnance Depot, South Dakota: Family housing, $1,428,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Operational and mainte­ nance facilities, $509,000. Erie Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities and utilities, $1,933,000. Frankford Arsenal, Pennsylvania: Utilities, $855,000. LOrdstown Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities, $875,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, (^olorado: Operational and maintenance facilities, $1,843,000. Ked River Arsenal, Texas: Operational and maintenance facilities, $140,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Research and development facilities and community facilities, $2,865,000. E(.>ck Island Arsenal, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facil­ ities, $347,000. Rossford Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Utilities, $400,000. Savanna Ordnance Depot, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facilities, $342,000. Seneca Ordnance Depot, New York: Community facilities, $129,000.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Actions in the Construction of the Airfield at Fort Lee, VA-17Th
    Union Calendar No, 781 87th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - House Report No. 1858 ILLEGAL ACTIONS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE AIRFIELD AT FORT LEE, VA. SEVENTEENTH REPORT BY THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS JUNE 20, 1962.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 72006 WASHINGTON : 1962 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS WILLIdM L. DAWSON, Illinois, Chairman OHET HOLIFIELD, California CLARE E. HOFFMAN, Michigan JACK BROOKS, Texss R. WALTER RIEHLMAN, New York L. H. FOUNTAIN, North Carollna GEORGE MEADER, Michigan PORTER HARDY, JR., Virginia CLARENCE J. BROWN, Ohio JOHN A. BLATNIK, Minnesota FLORENCE P. DWYER, New Jersey ROBERT E. JONES, Alabamn ROBERT P. GRIFFIN, Michigan EDWARD A. QARMATZ, Maryland GEORGE M. WALLHAUSER, New Jersey JOHN E. MOSS, California ODIN LANGEN, Minnesota JOE M. KILGORE, Texas JOHN B. ANDERSON, Illinois DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, Pennsylvania HENRY S. REUSS, Wisconsin F. BRADFORD MORSE, Massachusetts ELIZABETH PEE, West Virginia KATHRYN E. GRANAHAN, Pennsylvania JOHN S. MONAGAN, Connecticut NEAL SMITH, Iowa RICHARD E. LANKFORD, Maryland % ROSS BASS, Tennessee LUCIEN N. NEDZI, Michigan CHRISTINERAYDAVIS. Slaf Dtreelor JAMESA. LANIGAN,Ue~eral CoumeZ MILES Q. ROMNEY,Associate &nerd Counsel HELENM. BOYER,Minority Professional Raff J. P. CARLSON,Minority Coz~nseZ WILLIAM L. DAWSON, Clinois, Chairman DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida CLARENCE J. BROWN, Ollio KATHRYN E. GRANAHAN, Pennsylvania JOHN B. ANDERSON, Illinois NEAL SMITH, Iowa CLARE E. HOFFMAN, Michigan, Ex Oficio ELMER W. HENDERSON,COlln8el ARTHURPERLMAN, I"~e~fk7of07 DANIELKAVANAUGH, In~eslioatcr VEROATCAB. JOHNSON,Clerk IRENED. MANNINO.Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HOUSEOF REPRESENTATIVES, Washington, D.C., June 20, 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Page
    President’s Page New President’s Initiatives As you may have heard by now, our annual meeting in San Diego in May was very successful. The science, working meetings and the social events were fantastic, attendance neared recent record highs (1369), and good financial rev- enue will help keep us solvent. My theme on this page throughout the year will be “Make a Difference in Aerospace Medicine with AsMA.” To do that, we need to have a strong and effective organization in place to serve its members in that goal. In order to allow this, I would like to iterate some initiatives to perform with your help. The first initiative is to increase membership. As an in- ternational leader, AsMA speaks with authority and its posi- tions and resolutions are highly regarded. However, we Philip J. Scarpa, Jr., M.D., M.S. have an issue with declining membership. While we should not strive to have quantity over quality, a very low member- Wikipedia, Facebook, and Twitter accounts, key to market- ship could seriously hinder our inherent activities as an au- ing and branding our organization and key to reaching thoritative leader such as in producing a quality journal, our younger Aerospace Medicine specialists. extensive committee work, and strong advocacy. I propose The third initiative is to strengthen our finances. to appeal to certain groups that may wish to consider AsMA Unfortunately, AsMA lives too close to the break-even point membership, such as aviation nurses, dentists, medevac each year. If we continue unaltered, the organization will coast guard units, and aeromedical examiners.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California State Parks
    1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 Pelican SB Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Smith River Off Highway Vehicle Use Off Highway Vehicle Use Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating ( Tolowa Dunes SP C Educational Programs Educational Programs Wind Surfing/Surfing Wind Surfing/Surfing lo RV Sites w/Hookups RV Sites w/Hookups Gasquet 199 s Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating A 101 ed Horseback Riding Horseback Riding Lake Earl RV Dump Station Mountain Biking RV Dump Station Mountain Biking r i S v e n m i t h R i Rustic Cabins Rustic Cabins w Visitor Center Food Service Visitor Center Food Service Camp Site(s) Snow Sports Camp Site(s) Geocaching Snow Sports Crescent City i Picnic Area Camp Store Geocaching Picnic Area Camp Store Jedediah Smith Redwoods n Restrooms RV Access Swimming Restrooms RV Access Swimming t Hilt S r e Seiad ShowersMuseum ShowersMuseum e r California Lodging California Lodging SP v ) l Klamath Iron Fishing Fishing F i i Horse Beach Hiking Beach Hiking o a Valley Gate r R r River k T Happy Creek Res. Copco Del Norte Coast Redwoods SP h r t i t e s Lake State Parks State Parks · S m Camp v e 96 i r Hornbrook R C h c Meiss Dorris PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES t i Scott Bar f OREGON i Requa a Lake Tulelake c Admiral William Standley SRA, G2 • • (707) 247-3318 Indian Grinding Rock SHP, K7 • • • • • • • • • • • (209) 296-7488 Klamath m a P Lower CALIFORNIA Redwood K l a Yreka 5 Tule Ahjumawi Lava Springs SP, D7 • • • • • • • • • (530) 335-2777 Jack London SHP, J2 • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 938-5216 l K Sc Macdoel Klamath a o tt Montague Lake A I m R National iv Lake Albany SMR, K3 • • • • • • (888) 327-2757 Jedediah Smith Redwoods SP, A2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 458-3018 e S Mount a r Park h I4 E2 t 3 Newell Anderson Marsh SHP, • • • • • • (707) 994-0688 John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Area Profile
    7 percent of the population. The City of Pueblo is the county seat and most populous city in Pueblo El Paso County encompasses more than 2,158 County, serving as the economic hub of square miles – slightly more than twice the area southeastern Colorado. As one of the largest of the state of Rhode Island – and is the most steel-producing cities in the United States, Pueblo populous county in the State of Colorado. The is sometimes referred to as the “Steel City.” western portion of El Paso County is extremely Pueblo’s economy is bolstered by education, mountainous while the eastern part is prairie land healthcare services, and high-profile employers where dairy cows and beef cattle are the main such as Colorado State University (CSU) Pueblo, source of ranchers’ income. The altitude ranges Vestas Wind Systems, Mission Foods, and from about 5,095 feet on the southern border at Professional Bull Riders, Inc. Military convoys and Black Squirrel Creek to 14,115 feet on the summit transportation of supplies and equipment travel of Pikes Peak. Primary communities and their throughout the region as well. Active and retired year of incorporation in this county include: military personnel live in Pueblo County and ◼ City of Colorado Springs (1871) commute to the Colorado Springs area to access ◼ City of Fountain (1900) the installations and services there, and they have ◼ City of Manitou Springs (1888) a shared interest in maintenance of Interstate 25. ◼ Town of Calhan (1919) Primary communities and their year of ◼ Town of Ellicott (1897) incorporation
    [Show full text]
  • And Others an Empirical System for Assessing the Impact Of
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 289 906 TM 870 733 AUTHOR Rumford, Michael D.; And Others TITLE An Empirical System for Assessing the Impact of Aptitude Requirement Adjustments on Air Force Initial Skills Training. INSTITUTION Advanced Research Resources Organization, Bethesda, Md. SPONS AGENCY Air Force Human Resources Lab., Brooks AFB, Tex. Manpower and Personnel Div. REPORT NO AFHRL-TR-86-19 PUB DATE Sep 87 CONTRACT F33615-83-C-0036 NOTE 116p.; Appendix B is marginally legible. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01 /PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Education; *Aptitude Treatment Interaction; *Course Content; Labor Force Development; Mathematical Models; *Military Personnel; *Military Training; Occupational Surveys; *Outcomes of Education; Path Analysis; Predictive Measurement; Training Objectives; *Vocational Aptitude IDENTIFIERS Air Force; Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery ABSTRACT A multivariate modeling approach was developed to assess the impact of changes in aptitude requirement minimums on U.S. Air Force technical training outcomes. Initially, interviews were conducted with technical training personnel to identify significant student inputs, course content, and training outcome variables. Measures of these variables were formulated on the basis of personnel records and routinely available training documents, znd data were assembled for over 5,000 trainees in 39 initial-skills courses at five Air Force bases. A cross-validation sample consisted of about 1,000 trainees in nine courses. Using formal path analysis (LISREL V computer program), an empirical model of the training process was developed. Although aptitude was one of the best predictors of the quality of student performance, it interacted with a vaiiety of other student input and course content variables in determining training outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMETOWN HEROES HOMETOWN HEROES Heroic Stories from Brave Men and Women by Greg Mclntyre
    HOMETOWN HEROES HOMETOWN HEROES Heroic Stories From Brave Men and Women by Greg Mclntyre www.mcelderlaw.com Copyright © 2018 by Greg Mclntyre All Rights Reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical or electronic, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright holder. Published by Shelby House Publishing Web: www.mcelderlaw.com FRONT COVER IMAGE BIO he image on the front cover of this book is my Tgrandfather, J.C. Horne, in all his military splendor. Even today, reading the interview I did with him gives me chills. I loved that man with all my heart, he was my buddy. It’s hard for me to accept that the gentle man I knew and loved as my grandfather experienced the atrocities mentioned in his story. I can only imagine what four days R&R in Paris was like when you’d been fighting on the front lines during World War Two in Europe. You can read the interview with him in this book. Without veterans like my grandfather, we may not have a great country to call home. We owe Veterans our freedom. The world would be a much different place than it is today without their sacrifice. It is our duty to take care of them. PREFACE ’m Elder Law Attorney Greg McIntyre of McIntyre Elder Law. My passion is helping seniors protect their assets and legacies. II am also a veteran of the US Navy. I served on the USS Constellation and the USS Nimitz.
    [Show full text]
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793
    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Inn at Davis-Monthan Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona 355Th Force Support Squadron
    Welcome to the Inn at Davis-Monthan Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona 355th Force Support Squadron The appearance of local business names does NOT imply federal endorsements. All information to include addresses and telephone numbers are subject to change. Please call the business to confirm their operation hours. Please do not remove this directory from your room. PAGE 1 WELCOME LODGING GUESTS We are pleased you have chosen to stay at the Heritage Inn on Davis-Monthan as our guest and we look forward to making your stay comfortable, safe and pleasant. On behalf of the Fighter Wing commander, Mission Support Group commander, Force Support Squadron commander and the lodging staff, we welcome you to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. This directory has been especially prepared to provide you useful information regarding the Inn on Davis-Monthan policies, the City of Tucson and available guest services. Any commercial establishments listed in the guide are provided to you only as a convenience. We sincerely welcome your comments and recommendations to assist us in improving our service to you. You may do this by calling the reception center or by completing the Air Force Lodging Customer Comment Card, provided in your room or Online Lodging Website. We strive for excellence and guest service is our number one priority. Please take a moment to let us know how we are doing. If we can help in any way to make your visit more enjoyable, safe or comfortable, please call us. You can reach the manager on duty anytime by dialing “0” from your guest room phone.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth
    Texas Military Preparedness Commission Office of the Governor Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth 2020 MISSION Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth (NAS JRB FW) is the first joint reserve base in the United States. NAS JRB FW is responsbile for training and equipping aviation units and ground support personnel for deployment in preparation for world-wide mobilization. NAS JRB FW seeks to provide joint training capabilities and resources to enable war fighter readiness while sustaining personnel and families’ needs and future compatibility. TENANT COMMANDS* PARTNERSHIPS Navy - Information Command Reserve This is a historical asset to the local community and has excellent (CNIFR); Information Dominance Corps community support. Annual community engagements include Reserve Command; Region Southeast base tours, speaking engagements at local schools, Air Power Reserve Component Command Fort Worth; Demonstrations, and youth drug education programs. The Air Operational Support Center (NOSC); Fleet Power Council is extremely supportive of the installation, military Logistics Support Wing (CFLSW); Fleet families, and veterans. NAS JRB FW has completed a Joint Logistic Support Squadron 59 (VR-59). Land Use Study (JLUS) and, as a result, formed the Regional Coordination Committee (RCC) to enhance and maintain Air Force - 10th Air Force Headquarters; intergovernmental coorperation. The RCC at NAS JRB FW is a 301st Fighter Wing (Reserve); 136th Airlift nationally recognized model for intergovernmental cooperation. Wing (Texas Air National Guard); 457th Air Force Fighter Squadron. Variable Total Impact Army - Baker Company 90th Aviation Direct Employment 6,616 Support Battalion; Alpha Company, 6th $3.8 Battalion, 52nd Aviation Regiment Output to the Texas Economy (in billions) GDP (in billions) $2.3 Marine Corps - Marine Aircraft Group 41 (MAG-41); Fighter Attack Squadron 112 Disposable Personal Income (in billions) $1.3 (VMFA-112); 14th Marine Regiment; and the 8th Marine District.
    [Show full text]