DOCSLIB.ORG

Guns & Ammunition Manufacturing in the US

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Guns&AmmunitionManufacturingintheUS October 2012 1 Bite the bullet: Continued conflict will support revenue, but subsiding fears will limit growth IBISWorld Industry Report 33299a Guns & Ammunition Manufacturing in the US October2012 NimaSamadi 2 AboutthisIndustry 14 International Trade 32 Industry Assistance 2 Industry Definition 16 Business Locations 2 Main Activities 33 KeyStatistics 2 Similar Industries 18 CompetitiveLandscape 33 Industry Data 2 Additional Resources 18 Market Share Concentration 33 Annual Change 18 Key Success Factors 33 Key Ratios 3 IndustryataGlance 18 Cost Structure Benchmarks 20 Basis of Competition 34 Jargon&Glossary 4 IndustryPerformance 21 Barriers to Entry 4 Executive Summary 22 Industry Globalization 4 Key External Drivers 5 Current Performance 23 MajorCompanies 8 Industry Outlook 23 Alliant Techsystems Inc. 9 Industry Life Cycle 25 Freedom Group Inc. 11 Products&Markets 28 OperatingConditions 11 Supply Chain 28 Capital Intensity 11 Products & Services 29 Technology & Systems 12 Demand Determinants 30 Revenue Volatility 13 Major Markets 30 Regulation & Policy www.ibisworld.com |1-800-330-3772|[email protected] WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Guns&AmmunitionManufacturingintheUS October 2012 2 AboutthisIndustry IndustryDefinition This industry manufactures small grenade launchers), small arms arms (including shotguns, rifles, ammunition, other ammunition and revolvers, pistols, machine guns and ordnance and accessories. MainActivities Theprimaryactivitiesofthisindustryare Machine guns manufacturing Shotguns manufacturing Rifles manufacturing Revolvers manufacturing Pistols manufacturing Gun magazines manufacturing Small arms ammunition manufacturing Ammunition (except small arms) manufacturing Grenades manufacturing Mines manufacturing Themajorproductsandservicesinthisindustryare Small arms Small arms ammunition Other ammunition Other ordnance and accessories SimilarIndustries 32592 ExplosivesManufacturingintheUS Manufacturers of blasting caps, detonating caps and safety fuses. 33641b SpaceVehicle&MissileManufacturingintheUS Guided missiles are similar to the industry’s ordnance products, such as mortars, rocket launchers and howitzers. AdditionalResources Foradditionalinformationonthisindustry www.atf.gov Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives www.nra.org National Rifle Association www.nssf.org National Shooting Sports Foundation WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Guns&AmmunitionManufacturingintheUS October 2012 3 IndustryataGlance Guns&AmmunitionManufacturingin2012 KeyStatistics Revenue AnnualGrowth07-12 AnnualGrowth12-17 Snapshot $11.7bn 5.7% 3.5% Profit Exports Businesses $992.8m $4.4bn 465 Revenue vs. employment growth Federal funding for defense MarketShare Alliant 20 10 Techsystems Inc. 15 5 12.7% 10 0 Freedom Group 5 Inc. 6.4% −5 % change % 0 change % −5 −10 −10 −15 Year 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 Year 05 07 09 11 13 15 17 Revenue Employment SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM p. 23 Products and services segmentation (2012) KeyExternalDrivers Federalfunding fordefense 22% Other ordnance and accessories 27% Trade-weightedindex Small arms Localandstate governmentinvestment Worldpriceofsteel Crimerate 25% Other ammunition 26% p. 4 Small arms ammunition SOURCE:SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM WWW.IBISWORLD.COM IndustryStructure Life Cycle Stage Growth Regulation Level Medium Revenue Volatility Medium Technology Change Medium Capital Intensity Medium Barriers to Entry Medium Industry Assistance Medium Industry Globalization High Concentration Level Low Competition Level High FOR ADDITIONAL STATISTICS AND TIME SERIES SEE THE APPENDIX ON PAGE 33 WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Guns&AmmunitionManufacturingintheUS October 2012 4 IndustryPerformance ExecutiveSummary | KeyExternalDrivers | CurrentPerformance IndustryOutlook | LifeCycleStage Executive The Guns and Ammunition state and local law enforcement agencies Summary Manufacturing industry has grown also grew during the five years to 2012, strongly during the five years to 2012. due to the sustained threat of terrorism. The industry was in decline until the start Meanwhile, civilian gun sales spiked due of the decade, when the 9/11 terrorist to concerns about potential law changes attacks renewed demand for industry by the Obama administration and fears products. In addition, political over a possible increase in crime due to uncertainties combined with a the poor economy. foundering economy contributed to With demand for industry products unprecedented industry growth during surging over the past five years, domestic the five years to 2012. Over the period, manufacturers have been unable to revenue is expected to grow at a rate of completely satisfy domestic demand, so 5.7% per year on average, with revenue consumers have increasingly relied on increasing 8.2% in 2012 to $11.7 billion. imports to fill that gap. In fact, over the five years to 2012, imports grew at an average rate of 3.6% per year to $2.8 Growth will let up slightly, as fears about billion. The United Kingdom and Germany, in particular, have benefited rising crime and stricter laws subside from the United States’ renewed love of guns. This trend is expected to continue in During the past five years, the wars in the future, with net exports declining from Iraq and Afghanistan ushered in a about $1.6 billion in 2012 to $1.3 billion in substantial increase in the amount of 2017. Despite the industry growth that military spending by the government, occurred from 2007 to 2012, growth is resulting in an increase in purchases of expected to moderate over the next five the industry’s military-related products. years due to subsiding fears about Enduring conflicts in these regions and potential rising crime rates and gun law US troop surges caused the amount of changes. During the five years to 2017, revenue earned from the sales of these revenue is projected to grow at a rate of products to grow. The budgets of federal, 3.5% per year on average to $13.9 billion. KeyExternalDrivers Federal funding for defense and ammunition due to fears about their The US government and, specifically, its own safety. This driver is expected to Department of Defense are major decrease during 2013. purchasers of industry products. As the amount of expenditure allocated for Trade-weighted index these items increases, sales and revenue The trade-weighted index (TWI) typically grow as well. Government measures the strength of the US dollar funding for defense is influenced by relative to the currencies of countries fears of terrorism. As the fear of with which it trades. Because exports terrorism increases, the government account for a moderate portion of increases funding of federal, state and industry revenue and imports account for local law enforcement agencies to a growing portion of domestic demand, protect against or respond to these the TWI can significantly affect sales threats. This factor results in more gun volumes. This driver is expected to and ammunition purchases. Consumers increase during 2013, indicating a also increase their purchases of firearms potential threat to the industry. WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Guns&AmmunitionManufacturingintheUS October 2012 5 IndustryPerformance KeyExternalDrivers Local and state government investment manufactured. Demand is usually continued Growth in government spending on state sufficient to overcome any price and local agencies generally coincides increases imposed; therefore, revenue with increased funding of law typically increases when steel prices rise. enforcement. When law enforcement This driver is expected to increase during funding increases, gun and ammunition 2013 and is a potential opportunity for purchases grow as well. This driver is the industry. expected to decrease slowly during 2013. Crime rate World price of steel As the crime rate or the fear of it Purchases of raw materials, such as steel, increases, people purchase more guns form a large component of the average and ammunition for self-protection. firm’s cost structure. The ability for Therefore, a rising crime rate positively manufacturers to pass on price increases affects the industry. This driver is depends upon the specific product being expected to decrease slowly during 2013. Federal funding for defense Trade-weighted index 10 90 5 85 0 80 −5 Index % change % 75 −10 −15 70 Year 05 07 09 11 13 15 17 Year 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 SOURCE: WWW.IBISWORLD.COM The Guns and Ammunition Manufacturing aggressive growth during the five years to Current industry has experienced strong growth 2012, though, due to the United States’ Performance over the past five years. Despite the involvement in sustained military economic fallout generated by the global conflicts abroad. Other driving factors financial crisis, guns and ammunition have include an increased need for local, state proved to be items that many people and federal law enforcement because of believe they cannot live without. the threat of terrorism and heightened The industry experienced revenue consumer demand due to uncertainty growth during the recession from 2007 regarding federal gun law changes. As a through 2009, but revenue dipped 2.5% result of these factors, revenue is in 2010 to $10.5 billion as consumers’ expected to grow at an average annual recessionary fears about rising crime and rate of 5.7% to $11.7 billion in the five more restrictive gun control laws years to 2012, with an increase of 8.2% subsided. The industry experienced expected to occur from 2011 to 2012. WWW.IBISWORLD.COM Guns&AmmunitionManufacturingintheUS October 2012 6 IndustryPerformance
Recommended publications
  • Other Approaches to Civil-Military Integration: the Chinese and Japanese Arms Industries

    Other Approaches to Civil-Military Integration: the Chinese and Japanese Arms Industries

    Other Approaches to Civil-Military Integration: The Chinese and Japanese Arms Industries March 1995 OTA-BP-ISS-143 GPO stock #052-003-01408-4 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Other Approaches to Civil-Military Integration: The Chinese and Japanese Arms Industries, BP-ISS-143 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, March 1995). Foreword s part of its assessment of the potential for integrating the civil and military industrial bases, the Office of Technology Assessment con- sidered how the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Japan, two Asian states with sizable defense industries, have succeeded in Aachieving significant levels of civil-military integration (CMI). CMI involves the sharing of fixed costs by promoting the use of common technologies, processes, labor, equipment, material, and/or facilities. CMI can not only lower costs, but in some cases, it can also expedite the introduction of advanced commercial products and processes to the defense sector. The paper is divided into two sections, one on the PRC and one on Japan. Each section describes the structure and management of the respective defense industrial base and then compares it with its U.S. counterpart. The paper then assesses the degree to which lessons from the PRC and Japanese cases can be applied to the U.S. defense technology and industrial base (DTIB). Although the political and security situations of the PRC and Japan, as well as their CMI objectives, differ from those of the United States, several interest- ing observations can be made. The Japanese, for example, with a limited de- fense market and an American security guarantee, emphasize dual-use design as well as the commercial aspects of many defense developments.
  • Defense Industry Restructuring in Russia

    Defense Industry Restructuring in Russia

    S t a n f o r d U n i v e r s i t y C I S A C Center for International Security and Arms Control The Center for International Security and Arms Control, part of Stanford University’s Institute for International Studies, is a multidisciplinary community dedicated to research and train- ing in the field of international security. The Center brings together scholars, policymakers, scientists, area specialists, members of the business community, and other experts to examine a wide range of international security issues. CISAC publishes its own series of working papers and reports on its work and also sponsors a series, Studies in International Se- curity and Arms Control, through Stanford University Press. Center for International Security and Arms Control Stanford University 320 Galvez Street Stanford, California 94305-6165 (415) 723-9625 http://www-leland.stanford.edu/group/CISAC/ Contents Acknowledgments iv Executive Summary v I Introduction 1 Section One: Case Studies II The Central Aerohydrodynamic Research Institute (TsAGI) 9 III ELVIS+ and The Moscow Center for SPARC Technology (MCST) 28 IV Impuls 45 V The Mashinostroenie Enterprise 59 VI The Saratov Aviation Plant 79 Section Two: Analysis VII Privatization at Four Enterprises 111 VIII Organizational Restructuring 137 IX Principal Differences in Accounting Systems in Russia 163 and the United States X Reallocation of the Social Services 183 XI Conclusion 207 Glossary 216 1 Acknowledgments Many people have contributed to this report, and still more have contributed to the research leading up to it. In writing this report, we have not attempted to reach consensus among the authors on the interpretations to be drawn from the data.
  • Assessing Arms Makers' Corporate Social Responsibility

    Assessing Arms Makers' Corporate Social Responsibility

    Journal of Business Ethics (2007) 74:201–217 Ó Springer 2007 DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9228-9 Assessing Arms MakersÕ Corporate Social Responsibility Edmund F. Byrne ABSTRACT. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has Introduction become a focal point for research aimed at extending business ethics to extra-corporate issues; and as a result Over the last century in and beyond the United States many companies now seek to at least appear dedicated to large corporations attained almost complete auton- one or another version of CSR. This has not affected the omy in law and in cultural understandings as well arms industry, however. For, this industry has not been (Cray and Drutman, 2005). Prominent abuses of this discussed in CSR literature, perhaps because few CSR insularity led to the emergence of business ethics, scholars have questioned this industryÕs privileged status as an instrument of national sovereignty. But major changes which has focused on moral issues within the in the organization of political communities call tradi- boundaries of a corporate entity. But some business tional views of sovereignty into question. With these ethicists take the social and political context into ac- considerations in mind I assess the U.S. arms industry on count as they assert stakeholdersÕ rights or call for so- the basis of CSR requirements regarding the environ- cially responsible investing (SRI) and/or corporate ment, social equity, profitability, and use of political social responsibility (CSR). Scholars differ regarding power. I find that this industry fails to meet any of these what kinds of issues should be included under CSR four CSR requirements.
  • The Emerging EU Military- Industrial Complex Arms Industry Lobbying in Brussels

    The Emerging EU Military- Industrial Complex Arms Industry Lobbying in Brussels

    The emerging EU Military- Industrial Complex Arms industry lobbying in Brussels Frank Slijper TRANSNATIONAL INSTITUTE T N I B R I E F I N G S E R I E S Dutch CtW Campaign No 2005/1 Against Arms Trade Frank Slijper Author: Frank Slijper INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 3 Editors: 1 THE CONSTITUTION AND THE EUROPEAN Wilbert van der Zeijden DEFENCE AGENCY 5 Imre Szücs • Box: EDA in the Constitution Design: Zlatan Peric 2 MULTIPLE MILITARY STAKEHOLDERS 10 • The Group of Personalities Contact: • Box: Who is Philippe Busquin? Transnational Institute • Box: Meanwhile in the Netherlands De Wittenstraat 25 • LeaderSHIP 2015 PO Box 14656 • Box: Who is Erkki Liikanen? 1001 LD Amsterdam • Star 21 The Netherlands Tel: +31-20-6626608 Fax: +31-20-6757176 3 MILITARY INDUSTRIAL LOBBY 24 [email protected] • ASD www.tni.org • Box: EDIG + AECMA = ASD • Forum Europe and the New Defence Agenda • The Kangaroo Group • Box: Who is Karl von Wogau? 4 CONSEQUENCES FOR ARMS EXPORTS POLICY 31 CONCLUDING REMARKS 33 GLOSSARY 35 Contents of this booklet may be quoted or reproduced, provided that the source of informations is acknowledged. TNI would like to receive a copy of the document in which this booklet is used or quoted. You can stay informed of TNI publications and activities by subscribing to TNI’s bi-weekly email newsletter. Send your request to [email protected] Amsterdam, May 2005 The emerging EU military-industrial complex INTRODUCTION After many years of ideas, but little substance, military developments in the European Union are currently moving forward faster than ever before.
  • Ethical Issues in the Global Arms Industry

    Ethical Issues in the Global Arms Industry

    draft: March 7, 2015 Michael Davis, Illinois Institute of Technology Ethical Issues in the Global Arms Industry: A Role for Engineers Ethical Dilemmas in the Global Defense Industry Conference University of Pennsylvania Law School Philadelphia, April 16, 2015 This paper has four parts. The first two seek to clarify the subject of this conference, ethical issues in the global arms industry. The third sketches the role engineers have in much of the global arms industry. The last part considers one way that engineers might help with resolving some of the industry’s ethical issues. While the first part of this paper should contain few surprises, the last three will, I hope, contain more. 1. Dilemmas and Defense Let me begin with two differences between the official title of this conference and the title of my paper. First, I have substituted “issues” for “dilemmas”. Second, I have substituted “arms” for “defense”. The purpose of these changes is to avoid unnecessary disputes rather than to change the subject of the conference. Let me explain. A “dilemma” is a situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two (or more) equally undesirable alternatives.1 If the alternatives were not equally undesirable, the choice would be easy: choose the more desirable alternative. There would be no dilemma (though the choice might, like most good choices, have its cost). My impression is that the main ethical issues, questions, problems, or quandaries posed by the global arms industry are not dilemmas (in this sense) but complex situations in which most of the choices on offer are hard to assess and many of the best choices have yet to be devised.
  • Arm's Way: a Look Into the Culture of the Defense and Security Industry

    Arm's Way: a Look Into the Culture of the Defense and Security Industry

    ISSN 1653-2244 INSTITUTIONEN FÖR KULTURANTROPOLOGI OCH ETNOLOGI DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY In (H)Arm’s way: A look into the Culture of the defense and security industry By Stephenie G. Tesoro Supervisor: Susann Baez Ullberg 2019 MASTERUPPSATSER I KULTURANTROPOLOGI Nr 96 Table of Contents Notes on the Text ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Theoretical Framework and Research To-Date .................................................................................... 5 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 9 Polymorphous Engagement ................................................................................................................................. 9 Trade Shows: How Empty Halls Fuel Industries .......................................................................................... 10 Struggles in the Field .......................................................................................................................................... 12 The Context of the Global Arms Industry in the Twenty-First Century ...................................... 14 The Language of the Defense & Security Industry .........................................................................
  • BICC Paper9: an Overview of Defense Conversion in Ukraine

    BICC Paper9: an Overview of Defense Conversion in Ukraine

    by StacyLarsen June1997 StacyLarsen iscurrentlycompletingherMaster'sdegreeinInternationalPolicyStudiesattheMontereyInstituteofInternati onalStudies. SheconductedtheresearchforthispaperwhileinterningatBICC. Copyeditor:RobertMann BICC.ANDERELISABETHKIRCHE255311. 3BONNGERMAN. Y .PHONE+49-228-91196-0.FAX+49-228-241215 [email protected]:http://bicc.uni-bonn.de AN OVERVIEW OF DEFENSE CONVERSION IN UKRAINE CONTENTS I. SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 4 III. AREA ONE: REALLOCATION OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES 6 IV. AREA TWO: REORIENTATION OF MILITARY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)—COOPERATIVE INVESTMENT IN UKRAINE’S SOCIOECONOMIC FUTURE 9 1. Military R&D in Ukraine 9 2. R&D Conversion Programs in Ukraine 9 2.1 Science and Technology Center of Ukraine 9 2.2 Civilian Research and Development Foundation 11 2.3 International Association for the Promotion of Cooperation 12 with Scientists from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union 3. The Role of External Assistance 14 4. Questions for Further Research 15 4.1 The Extent of ‘Brain Drain’ 15 4.2 R&D Conversion in Conventional Weapons Technologies 15 i V. AREA THREE: UKRAINE’S MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX—CONVERSION OR ARMS MARKET DEVELOPMENT? 16 1. The Arms Industry in Ukraine 16 1.1 Conversion Plans and Projects in the Aerospace, Aviation 22 and Shipbuilding Sectors 1.2 Obstacles to Conversion 23 1.3 Pursuing the Arms Market 25 2. The Role of External Assistance 27 3. Questions for Further Research 28 3.1 Successof Independent Conversion Efforts 28 3.2 Role of Private Investment in Defense Industry Restructuring 28 3.3 Consequences of Arms Export Expansion 29 VI. AREA FOUR: DEMOBILIZATION AND REINTEGRATION OF MILITARY PERSONNEL 30 1. Demobilization: Obstacles and Opportunities 30 2.
  • Bushmaster 25Mm Machine Cannon

    Bushmaster 25Mm Machine Cannon

    7/16/2016 Bushmaster 25mm Machine Cannon LOGIN username PASSWORD password Submit SEARCH Submit BUSHMASTER 25MM MACHINE CANNON By Robert Bruce IMAGE GALLERY Designed in the early 1970’s by engineers at Hughes Helicopters, cannon­caliber BUSHMASTER CHAIN GUNS on the Apache Attack Helicopter, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, and many other platforms have proven in combat to be without equal in the world. With Hughes having been successively merged with McDonnell Douglas and now Boeing, more than 10,000 of the 30mm M230 and the 25mm M242 are in service in the US and allied nations, enjoying an unsurpassed reputation for reliability, accuracy and operational effectiveness. Concepts Compared Typically, large caliber automatic cannon suffer from any number of problems that must be addressed by tradeoffs in design. Self­powered guns utilize by­products from firing the ammunition to operate all functions including feed, locking, extraction, and ejection. This means that their parts must be relatively heavy and resistant to extreme stress. Also, even small variations in the ammunition can lead to stoppages. Gatling­type weapons utilize external power, usually electric motors or hydraulic systems, to rotate a cluster of barrels into firing position. While this can promote greater reliability and high rates of fire, the penalties tend to be an increase in complexity and maintenance difficulties, a high system weight and bulk, plus a greater cost. In contrast, Hughes engineers offered their single barrel, rotating bolt, electrically driven “Chain Gun,” so called because of its motorcycle type sprocket and chain operating mechanism. Not unlike an automobile engine’s timing chain, the Hughes system provides unparalleled precision, smoothness and positive action to all phases of the cycle of operation.
  • Improvised Weapons

    Improvised Weapons

    Updated Apr 2009 The purpose of this presentation is to make you better aware of the numerous improvised weapons and ingenious hiding places that have been created and are in use by today’s criminals. The majority of the material used in this presentation comes from various law enforcement officer safety bulletins throughout the world. This presentation attempts to combine information from those bulletins into one easy to view presentation. In the interest of keeping the focus to the threat on hand, many of the circumstances surrounding the identification of these items has been removed. Knowledge is safety. Unless you stay informed, danger will find you… Improvised Weapon Any item that has been designed, modified, or disguised to function as a weapon. California’s Dangerous Weapon Law (12020 P.C.) 12020(a) PC Any person in this state who does any of the following is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or in the state prison: (1) Manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, or possesses any cane gun or wallet gun, any undetectable firearm, any firearm which is not immediately recognizable as a firearm, any camouflaging firearm container, any ammunition which contains or consists of any flechette dart, any bullet containing or carrying an explosive agent, any ballistic knife, any multiburst trigger activator, any nunchaku, any short-barreled shotgun, any short-barreled rifle, any metal knuckles, any belt buckle knife, any leaded cane, any zip gun, any shuriken, any unconventional pistol, any lipstick case knife, any cane sword, any shobi-zue, any air gauge knife, any writing pen knife, any metal military practice handgrenade or metal replica hand grenade, or any instrument or weapon of the kind commonly known as a blackjack, slungshot, billy, sandclub, sap, or sandbag.
  • The National Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings

    The National Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings

    THE NATIONAL SURVEY OF HISTORIC SITES AND BUILDINGS Theme XVII-b COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY 1 9 6 6 VOLUME I THE HISTORICAL NARRATIVE United States Department of the Interior Stewart L. Udall, Secretary National Park Service George B. Hartzog, Jr., Director The National Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings Theme XVII·b COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY 1966 VOLUME I THE HISTORICAL NARRATIVE United states Department of the Interior stewart L, Udall, Secretary National Park Service George B. Hartzog, Jr. 1 Director COICTENTS FOR VOLUME I Page Preface .......... .............. .................................. i Acknowledgements ............... ............. , , ii Part I - Historical Narrative ........................................ ... 1 CHAPTER I The Colonial Era, l607-1775: The Rise of Merchant Capitalism Colonial Commerce .............. ................. 1 The Trade of the Southern Colonies .............................. 1 The Trade of the New England and Middle Colonies ... 2 Colonial Industry .............. ... .............. ....... 4 Initial Efforts at Economic Exploitation, I607-I629 . 5 Industrial Organization of Colonial Society ................. 6 Household Manufacturing .............................. .... 6 Skilled Artisans . .................... .......... 7 The Colonial Commercial Industries ........................... 8 Jl) Slave Trade . ....................... 8 ,2) The Pur Trade............... 9 ,3) The Fishery and V/haling.......... 10 [4) The Lumber Industry.........................................11 5) Shipbuilding Industry..................
  • The Arms Industry and Increasingly Autonomous Weapons

    The Arms Industry and Increasingly Autonomous Weapons

    Slippery Slope The arms industry and increasingly autonomous weapons www.paxforpeace.nl Reprogramming War This report is part of a PAX research project on the development of lethal autonomous weapons. These weapons, which would be able to kill people without any direct human involvement, are highly controversial. Many experts warn that they would violate fundamental legal and ethical principles and would be a destabilising threat to international peace and security. In a series of four reports, PAX analyses the actors that could potentially be involved in the development of these weapons. Each report looks at a different group of actors, namely states, the tech sector, the arms industry, and universities and research institutes. The present report focuses on the arms industry. Its goal is to inform the ongoing debate with facts about current developments within the defence sector. It is the responsibility of companies to be mindful of the potential applications of certain new technologies and the possible negative effects when applied to weapon systems. They must also clearly articulate where they draw the line to ensure that humans keep control over the use of force by weapon systems. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact Daan Kayser ([email protected]). Colophon November 2019 ISBN: 978-94-92487-46-9 NUR: 689 PAX/2019/14 Author: Frank Slijper Thanks to: Alice Beck, Maaike Beenes and Daan Kayser Cover illustration: Kran Kanthawong Graphic design: Het IJzeren Gordijn © PAX This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/deed.en We encourage people to share this information widely and ask that it be correctly cited when shared.
  • INNOVATORS in ON-THE-MOVE Remote Weapon Stations and Multi-Mission FIREPOWER Precision for the Modern Battlespace CUSTOMER and SUPPLIER ENGAGEMENT

    INNOVATORS in ON-THE-MOVE Remote Weapon Stations and Multi-Mission FIREPOWER Precision for the Modern Battlespace CUSTOMER and SUPPLIER ENGAGEMENT

    INNOVATORS IN ON-THE-MOVE Remote weapon stations and multi-mission FIREPOWER precision for the modern battlespace CUSTOMER AND SUPPLIER ENGAGEMENT Aside from its pioneering technology, EOS has grown its business based on customer- focused fundamentals. Starting early with customer engagement that seeks to optimise both an understanding of the customer requirement and how the technology can be enhanced to the customer performance criteria; the detailed engagement approach continues right through to system delivery. EOS’ ability to achieve tight customer optimisation is facilitated by four critical advantages. Firstly, EOS has designed and owns the IP for all its key technologies and U.S. Army CROWS training class in Iraq Australian Defence Force (ADF) Bushmaster in action components allowing for detailed control over all layers of the system and over the quality of every component and process input. This detailed control is what enables world-class REMOTE precision engagement capability. Secondly, design modularity is key, allowing EOS to optimise systems to meet each WEAPON customer’s specific requirements. Modularity through the employment of common line replacement units and operator interfaces also works to keep acquisition, training and STATION life-cycle costs low by maximising simplicity and commonality across the entire EOS PIONEERS product family. U.S. Army ‘Hummers’ with EOS CROWS I in Iraq EOS’ CROWS I on a U.S. Army ‘Hummer’ ADF Bushmaster on operation with EOS’ R400S EOS’ CROWS II with a 0.50 cal heavy machine gun Thirdly, all EOS RWS are C4I architecture- agnostic – able to be integrated with Generic Electro Optic Systems (EOS) is the privatisation of Australia’s satellite tracking with the control and precision required for unit for fitment to a variety of direct and indirect awarded.