DOCSLIB.ORG

The SIPRI Top 100 Arms-Producing and Military Services Companies, 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SIPRI Fact Sheet December 2019 THE SIPRI TOP 100 KEY FACTS w The arms sales of the SIPRI ARMS-PRODUCING AND Top 100 arms-producing and military services companies MILITARY SERVICES (excluding China) were $420 billion in 2018—an increase of 4.6 per cent COMPANIES, 2018 compared with sales in 2017. aude fleurant, alexandra kuimova, diego lopes da silva, w Taken together, the arms nan tian, pieter d. wezeman and siemon t. wezeman sales of Top 100 companies based in the United States increased by 7.2 per cent in 2018. With 43 companies Arms sales of the world’s largest arms-producing and military services listed—one more than in 2017— companies (the SIPRI Top 100) were $420 billion in 2018 (see annex 1).1 This the US companies’ share of total was an increase of 4.6 per cent compared with 2017 total Top 100 arms sales Top 100 arms sales was 59 per (figures exclude China, see box 1). The arms sales of the Top 100 in 2018 were cent in 2018. 47 per cent higher than in 2002 (see figure 1). The growth in total Top 100 w arms sales in 2018 was primarily driven by increases in sales by the highest- The combined arms sales of the 27 arms producers in the ranked companies—specifically the top five companies, all of which are Top 100 based in Europe were based in the United States. The growth in Top 100 arms sales in 2018 can be $102 billion in 2018—a slight correlated to increases in global military expenditure, particularly the rise increase of 0.7 per cent in US spending from 2017 to 2018. compared with 2017. European companies accounted for 24 per cent of total Top 100 arms sales 1 For further detail on methodology see ‘About the SIPRI Arms Industry Database’ in this fact in 2018. sheet. The full data set is available on the SIPRI website. w Ten companies based in Russia were listed in the Top 100 in 2018. Their total 500 arms sales were $36.2 billion— ) 400 a marginal decrease of 0.4 per cent on 2017. One Russian 300 company ranked in the top 10 in 2018. 200 w Collectively, the arms sales of tal arms sales (US$ b. 100 companies in the Top 100 based To outside Europe, Russia and the 0 USA accounted for $36.2 billion 3 4 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2002200 200 20052006200 2008200920 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 of the total Top 100 arms sales in 2018, representing an 8.6 per Constant (2018) US$ Current US$ cent share of the total. Figure 1. Total arms sales of companies in the SIPRI Top 100, 2002–18 w In 2018 the total sales of the 15 largest manufacturing Notes: ‘Arms sales’ are defined as sales of military goods and services to military custom- companies were almost six ers domestically and abroad. The data in this graph refers to the companies in the SIPRI Top 100 in each year, so the data covers a different set of companies each year, except for times greater than the 2017 and 2018, which refer to the set of companies listed in 2018. 2002 is the first year for combined arms sales of the which SIPRI has sufficient data to include Russian companies in its Top 100 lists. companies in the Top 100. Source: SIPRI Arms Industry Database, Dec. 2019. 2 sipri fact sheet DEVELOPMENTS IN THE TOP 100 The Top 100 companies are ranked by their annual arms sales. Companies are also categorized by the country in which their ownership and control structures are located. As has been the case every year since 2002, the vast majority of companies listed in the Top 100 in 2018 were based in the USA, Europe and Russia, with the USA having, by far, the highest number of com panies listed.2 A total of 70 companies based in the USA and Europe are listed in 2018, accounting for 83 per cent of total Top 100 arms sales. At $348 billion in 2018, their combined arms sales were 5.2 per cent higher than in 2017. Arms sales of companies based in Europe in the Top 100 were $102 billion in 2018—a slight increase of 0.7 per cent compared with 2017. Despite an over- all decrease of 4.8 per cent in 2018 (see figure 2), the combined arms sales of companies based in the United Kingdom listed in the Top 100 remained the highest in Europe. The decline in sales was partly because of ongoing delays in the UK’s arms procurement programme. The combined arms sales of the 10 companies based in Russia listed in the Top 100 for 2018 were $36.2 billion. Of the countries with companies ranked in the Top 100, Russia had the second-largest share of total Top 100 arms sales (see figure 3). Arms sales of Russian companies decreased marginally (by 0.4 per cent) in 2018. Their share of total Top 100 arms sales dropped from 9.7 per cent in 2017 to 8.6 per cent in 2018. This was largely a result of the higher Top 100 total in 2018 due to the substantial growth in the com- bined arms sales of US and European companies. The arms sales of the top 10 companies in the Top 100 for 2018 totalled $210 billion—an increase of 5.8 per cent on 2017. In 2018, for the first time since 2002, the top 5 in the Top 100 consisted solely of companies based in the USA. These five companies had combined sales of $148 billion or 35 per cent of total Top 100 arms sales. Companies ranked from 6th to 10th accounted for 15 per cent of the total. THE UNITED STATES Taken together, the arms sales of the 43 companies based in the USA listed in the Top 100 were $246 billion in 2018—an increase of 7.2 per cent on 2017. The USA’s share of total Top 100 arms sales was 59 per cent in 2018. 2 Developments relating to companies based in Russia are assessed separately from the regional discussion on Europe in this analysis. Box 1. Chinese arms-producing companies Chinese arms-producing companies are not covered by the SIPRI Top 100 because of a lack of data on which to make a reasonable or consistent estimate of arms sales dating back to 2002. Nonetheless, some information is available on several major companies that are part of the mainly state-owned Chinese arms industry. SIPRI estimates that three Chinese arms companies would be ranked in the top 10 of the Top 100 arms-producing and mili- tary services companies: AVIC, NORINCO and CETC. Based on the limited information available and taking into account arms exports and the general growth in China’s military spending, at least seven other arms companies would probably be in the Top 100 if figures for arms sales were available. the sipri top 100 arms-producing companies, 2018 3 Lockheed Martin is, by far, the largest arms pro- ducer in the world: in 2018 its share of total Top 100 United States 7.2% arms sales was 11 per cent and its arms sales grew by Russia –0.4% 5.2 per cent. It has occupied the first position in the United Kingdom –4.8% Top 100 every year since 2009. An important driver France 2.4% of Lockheed Martin’s higher arms sales in 2018 was Trans-European 7.8% an increase in the deliveries of F-35 combat aircraft Italy 5.0% to the USA and other countries. In 2018 the arms Japan 1.1% sales of Boeing—the second-largest arms producer Israel 8.6% in the world—were $29.2 billion or 6.9 per cent of Germany –3.8% total Top 100 arms sales. Northrop Grumman’s India –6.9% arms sales grew by 14 per cent in 2018, to $26.2 bil- South Korea 9.9% lion, making it the third-largest arms producer. The Other 9.1% $3.3 billion growth in its arms sales was the largest –10–8–6–4–20246810 absolute increase of any company listed in the Top 100 for 2018 and was driven by its acquisition of Figure 2. Percentage change in arms sales of companies in Orbital-ATK and strong domestic and international the SIPRI Top 100, by country, 2017–18 demand for its weapons, including intercontinental Notes: The change refers to the companies in the Top 100 for 2018. ballistic missiles and missile defence systems. The figures are based on arms sales in constant (2018) US dollars. Arms sales by Raytheon (ranked 4th) and General The category ‘Other’ consists of countries whose companies’ arms sales comprise less than 1% of the total: Australia, Canada, Poland, Dynamics (ranked 5th) rose by 3.9 and 10 per cent, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and Ukraine. respectively. Source: SIPRI Arms Industry Database, Dec. 2019. A new phase of mergers and acquisitions in the US arms industry The summary of the US 2018 National Defense Strategy published by the administration of President Donald J. Trump stated that the current secu- rity environment was characterized by ‘Inter-state strategic competition’ and that the US military advantage had atrophied and needed to be rebuilt in order to address the strategic competition from China and Russia.3 This document emphasized the USA’s commitment to continue with and strengthen its large-scale arms modernization programme announced in 2017.
Recommended publications
  • Separate Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2019

    Separate Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2019

    201Separate financial9 statements PPorscheorsche TaycanTaycan TurboTurbo S 3 Content Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 6 Fundamental information about the group 10 Report on economic position 12 Significant events and developments at the Porsche SE Group 12 Significant events and developments at the Volkswagen Group 20 Business development 24 Results of operations, financial position and net assets 31 Porsche Automobil Holding SE (financial statements pursuant to the German Commercial Code) 37 Sustainable value enhancement in the Porsche SE Group 41 Overall statement on the economic situation of Porsche SE and the Porsche SE Group 43 Remuneration report 44 Opportunities and risks of future development 52 Publication of the declaration of compliance and corporate governance report 78 Subsequent events 79 Forecast report and outlook 80 Glossary 85 4 Financials 86 Balance sheet of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 90 Income statement of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 91 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements 92 Independent auditor’s report 212 Responsibility statement 220 5 VVolkswagenolkswagen IID.3D.3 6 1 Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 7 8 Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 6 Fundamental information about the group 10 Report on economic position 12 Significant events and developments at the Porsche SE Group 12 Significant events and developments at the Volkswagen Group 20 Business development 24 Results
  • Organization Sector Report Title Publication Year Report Type

    Organization Sector Report Title Publication Year Report Type

    GRI Reports List 2012（Japan） last updated: April 2013 Organization Sector Report Title Publication Year Report type Application Level Status Adeka Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Advantest Technology Hardware Corporate Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced AEON Retailers Environmental and Social Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Aeon Retailers Environmental & Social Initiatives 2012 2012 Non - GRI Aishin Seiki Equipment Aisin Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Ajinomoto Food and Beverage Products Sustainability Report 2012 2012 Non - GRI All Nippon Airways Coompany Limited Aviation Annual Report 2012 Non - GRI Asahi Glass Company Chemicals AGC Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Asahi Group Holdings Food and Beverage Products CSR Communication Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Asahi Kasei Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Astellas Pharma Health Care Products Annual Report 2012 2012 GRI - G3.1 B Self-declared azbil Conglomerates azbil Report 2012 2012 Non - GRI Benesse Holdings, Inc. Other Benesse Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Bridgestone Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Brother Technology Hardware CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Canon Technology Hardware Sustainability Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Casio Consumer Durables Sustainability Report 2012 2012 GRI - G3.1 B Self-declared Chiyoda Corporation Construction CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Chubu Electric Power Energy Annual Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Citizen Holdings Conglomerates CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced
  • Other Approaches to Civil-Military Integration: the Chinese and Japanese Arms Industries

    Other Approaches to Civil-Military Integration: the Chinese and Japanese Arms Industries

    Other Approaches to Civil-Military Integration: The Chinese and Japanese Arms Industries March 1995 OTA-BP-ISS-143 GPO stock #052-003-01408-4 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Other Approaches to Civil-Military Integration: The Chinese and Japanese Arms Industries, BP-ISS-143 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, March 1995). Foreword s part of its assessment of the potential for integrating the civil and military industrial bases, the Office of Technology Assessment con- sidered how the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Japan, two Asian states with sizable defense industries, have succeeded in Aachieving significant levels of civil-military integration (CMI). CMI involves the sharing of fixed costs by promoting the use of common technologies, processes, labor, equipment, material, and/or facilities. CMI can not only lower costs, but in some cases, it can also expedite the introduction of advanced commercial products and processes to the defense sector. The paper is divided into two sections, one on the PRC and one on Japan. Each section describes the structure and management of the respective defense industrial base and then compares it with its U.S. counterpart. The paper then assesses the degree to which lessons from the PRC and Japanese cases can be applied to the U.S. defense technology and industrial base (DTIB). Although the political and security situations of the PRC and Japan, as well as their CMI objectives, differ from those of the United States, several interest- ing observations can be made. The Japanese, for example, with a limited de- fense market and an American security guarantee, emphasize dual-use design as well as the commercial aspects of many defense developments.
  • Defense Industry Restructuring in Russia

    Defense Industry Restructuring in Russia

    S t a n f o r d U n i v e r s i t y C I S A C Center for International Security and Arms Control The Center for International Security and Arms Control, part of Stanford University’s Institute for International Studies, is a multidisciplinary community dedicated to research and train- ing in the field of international security. The Center brings together scholars, policymakers, scientists, area specialists, members of the business community, and other experts to examine a wide range of international security issues. CISAC publishes its own series of working papers and reports on its work and also sponsors a series, Studies in International Se- curity and Arms Control, through Stanford University Press. Center for International Security and Arms Control Stanford University 320 Galvez Street Stanford, California 94305-6165 (415) 723-9625 http://www-leland.stanford.edu/group/CISAC/ Contents Acknowledgments iv Executive Summary v I Introduction 1 Section One: Case Studies II The Central Aerohydrodynamic Research Institute (TsAGI) 9 III ELVIS+ and The Moscow Center for SPARC Technology (MCST) 28 IV Impuls 45 V The Mashinostroenie Enterprise 59 VI The Saratov Aviation Plant 79 Section Two: Analysis VII Privatization at Four Enterprises 111 VIII Organizational Restructuring 137 IX Principal Differences in Accounting Systems in Russia 163 and the United States X Reallocation of the Social Services 183 XI Conclusion 207 Glossary 216 1 Acknowledgments Many people have contributed to this report, and still more have contributed to the research leading up to it. In writing this report, we have not attempted to reach consensus among the authors on the interpretations to be drawn from the data.
  • Assessing Arms Makers' Corporate Social Responsibility

    Assessing Arms Makers' Corporate Social Responsibility

    Journal of Business Ethics (2007) 74:201–217 Ó Springer 2007 DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9228-9 Assessing Arms MakersÕ Corporate Social Responsibility Edmund F. Byrne ABSTRACT. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has Introduction become a focal point for research aimed at extending business ethics to extra-corporate issues; and as a result Over the last century in and beyond the United States many companies now seek to at least appear dedicated to large corporations attained almost complete auton- one or another version of CSR. This has not affected the omy in law and in cultural understandings as well arms industry, however. For, this industry has not been (Cray and Drutman, 2005). Prominent abuses of this discussed in CSR literature, perhaps because few CSR insularity led to the emergence of business ethics, scholars have questioned this industryÕs privileged status as an instrument of national sovereignty. But major changes which has focused on moral issues within the in the organization of political communities call tradi- boundaries of a corporate entity. But some business tional views of sovereignty into question. With these ethicists take the social and political context into ac- considerations in mind I assess the U.S. arms industry on count as they assert stakeholdersÕ rights or call for so- the basis of CSR requirements regarding the environ- cially responsible investing (SRI) and/or corporate ment, social equity, profitability, and use of political social responsibility (CSR). Scholars differ regarding power. I find that this industry fails to meet any of these what kinds of issues should be included under CSR four CSR requirements.
  • Download PDF, 19 Pages, 505.25 KB

    Download PDF, 19 Pages, 505.25 KB

    VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Shareholdings of Volkswagen AG and the Volkswagen Group in accordance with sections 285 and 313 of the HGB and presentation of the companies included in Volkswagen's consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS 12 as of 31.12.2019 Exchange rate VW AG 's interest Equity Profit/loss (1€ =) in capital in % in thousands, in thousands, Name and domicile of company Currency Dec. 31, 2019 Direct Indirect Total local currency local currency Footnote Year I. PARENT COMPANY VOLKSWAGEN AG, Wolfsburg II. SUBSIDIARIES A. Consolidated companies 1. Germany ASB Autohaus Berlin GmbH, Berlin EUR - 100.00 100.00 16,272 1,415 2018 AUDI AG, Ingolstadt EUR 99.64 - 99.64 13,701,699 - 1) 2019 Audi Berlin GmbH, Berlin EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,971 - 1) 2018 Audi Electronics Venture GmbH, Gaimersheim EUR - 100.00 100.00 60,968 - 1) 2019 Audi Frankfurt GmbH, Frankfurt am Main EUR - 100.00 100.00 8,477 - 1) 2018 Audi Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg EUR - 100.00 100.00 13,425 - 1) 2018 Audi Hannover GmbH, Hanover EUR - 100.00 100.00 16,621 - 1) 2018 AUDI Immobilien GmbH & Co. KG, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 82,470 3,399 2019 AUDI Immobilien Verwaltung GmbH, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 114,355 1,553 2019 Audi Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,525 - 1) 2018 Audi München GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 270 - 1) 2018 Audi Real Estate GmbH, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,859 4,073 2019 Audi Sport GmbH, Neckarsulm EUR - 100.00 100.00 100 - 1) 2019 Audi Stuttgart GmbH, Stuttgart EUR - 100.00 100.00 6,677 - 1) 2018 Auto & Service PIA GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 19,895 - 1) 2018 Autonomous Intelligent Driving GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 250 - 1) 2018 Autostadt GmbH, Wolfsburg EUR 100.00 - 100.00 50 - 1) 2018 B.
  • 1 Building a Rattan Weapon for SCA Youth Combat by Mistress Arianna of Wynthrope Baronial Youth Combat Marshall, Barony-Marche O

    1 Building a Rattan Weapon for SCA Youth Combat by Mistress Arianna of Wynthrope Baronial Youth Combat Marshall, Barony-Marche O

    Building a Rattan Weapon for SCA Youth Combat By Mistress Arianna of Wynthrope Baronial Youth Combat Marshall, Barony-Marche of the Debatable Lands This article demonstrates one way to make rattan weapons for SCA Youth Combat Division 2 and 3 fighters. It is not the only way, but weapons made this way have passed inspection by Kingdom and Society level Youth Combat Marshals and proven to be durable and functional. You will need the following supplies and equipment: • A piece of rattan between ¾” and 1” in diameter and appropriate in length for the weapon you wish to make. Weapon length should be proportional to the fighter. Great weapons have the following maximum length limitations: • Spear - 7.5’ • Pole-arms - 6’ - The striking edge shall not exceed 1/3 of the weapons total length. • Great sword - 6’ - No more than 18" haft (hilt). • 1” inner diameter pipe foam that is at least 3/8” thick and long enough for the desired weapon • Closed cell camp foam, any thickness from ¼” to ¾” • A roll of duct tape • A roll of electrical tape in a contrasting color to the duct tape • Scissors • A utility knife • For single-handed weapons, a shoelace or other cord for a lanyard • A ruler 1 STEP 1 – Making sure your rattan is properly sized Using a ruler, verify that your rattan is at least ¾” and no more than 1” in diameter. If it is too large, use a plane or draw knife to shave it down, then sand the entire shaft. If it is less than ¾” in diameter, do not use that piece of rattan.
  • Small Arms-Individual Weapons

    Small Arms-Individual Weapons

    290 Small Arms–Individual Weapons INVESTMENT COMPONENT Modernization thousand M14 EBRs were assembled be mounted on the shotgun. The bolt • 1QFY09: Materiel release and full- at TACOM Lifecycle Management handle is mountable on either side for rate production decision Recapitalization Command at Rock Island Arsenal in ambidextrous handling. • 3QFY09: First unit equipped response to Operational Need Statements M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun Maintenance requesting a longer range capability. The MASS enables Soldiers to transition System: The upgraded weapons are currently in between lethal and less-than-lethal fires • 4QFY09: Limited user test and MISSION service with select Army units. and adds the capability of a separate evaluation with MP units Enables warfighters and small units to shotgun without carrying a second • 2QFY10: Low-rate initial production engage targets with lethal fire to defeat The M320 Grenade Launcher is the weapon. Additional features include a approved or deter adversaries. replacement to all M203 series grenade box magazine, flip-up sights, and an • 4QFY10: First article testing launchers on M16 Rifles and M4 extendable stand-off device for door complete DESCRIPTION Carbines. A modular system, it attaches breaching. The M4 Carbine replaces the M16 series under the barrel of the rifle or carbine PROJECTED ACTIVITIES Rifles in all Brigade Combat Teams, and can convert to a stand-alone weapon. SYSTEM INTERDEPENDENCIES M4 Carbine: Division Headquarters, and other The M320 improves on current grenade None • Continue: M4 production, deliveries, selected units. It is 1.4 pounds lighter launchers with an integral day/night and fielding and more portable than the M16 series of sighting system and improved safety PROGRAM STATUS M14 EBR: rifles.
  • The Emerging EU Military- Industrial Complex Arms Industry Lobbying in Brussels

    The Emerging EU Military- Industrial Complex Arms Industry Lobbying in Brussels

    The emerging EU Military- Industrial Complex Arms industry lobbying in Brussels Frank Slijper TRANSNATIONAL INSTITUTE T N I B R I E F I N G S E R I E S Dutch CtW Campaign No 2005/1 Against Arms Trade Frank Slijper Author: Frank Slijper INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 3 Editors: 1 THE CONSTITUTION AND THE EUROPEAN Wilbert van der Zeijden DEFENCE AGENCY 5 Imre Szücs • Box: EDA in the Constitution Design: Zlatan Peric 2 MULTIPLE MILITARY STAKEHOLDERS 10 • The Group of Personalities Contact: • Box: Who is Philippe Busquin? Transnational Institute • Box: Meanwhile in the Netherlands De Wittenstraat 25 • LeaderSHIP 2015 PO Box 14656 • Box: Who is Erkki Liikanen? 1001 LD Amsterdam • Star 21 The Netherlands Tel: +31-20-6626608 Fax: +31-20-6757176 3 MILITARY INDUSTRIAL LOBBY 24 [email protected] • ASD www.tni.org • Box: EDIG + AECMA = ASD • Forum Europe and the New Defence Agenda • The Kangaroo Group • Box: Who is Karl von Wogau? 4 CONSEQUENCES FOR ARMS EXPORTS POLICY 31 CONCLUDING REMARKS 33 GLOSSARY 35 Contents of this booklet may be quoted or reproduced, provided that the source of informations is acknowledged. TNI would like to receive a copy of the document in which this booklet is used or quoted. You can stay informed of TNI publications and activities by subscribing to TNI’s bi-weekly email newsletter. Send your request to [email protected] Amsterdam, May 2005 The emerging EU military-industrial complex INTRODUCTION After many years of ideas, but little substance, military developments in the European Union are currently moving forward faster than ever before.
  • Explosive Weapon Effectsweapon Overview Effects

    Explosive Weapon Effectsweapon Overview Effects

    CHARACTERISATION OF EXPLOSIVE WEAPONS EXPLOSIVEEXPLOSIVE WEAPON EFFECTSWEAPON OVERVIEW EFFECTS FINAL REPORT ABOUT THE GICHD AND THE PROJECT The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) is an expert organisation working to reduce the impact of mines, cluster munitions and other explosive hazards, in close partnership with states, the UN and other human security actors. Based at the Maison de la paix in Geneva, the GICHD employs around 55 staff from over 15 countries with unique expertise and knowledge. Our work is made possible by core contributions, project funding and in-kind support from more than 20 governments and organisations. Motivated by its strategic goal to improve human security and equipped with subject expertise in explosive hazards, the GICHD launched a research project to characterise explosive weapons. The GICHD perceives the debate on explosive weapons in populated areas (EWIPA) as an important humanitarian issue. The aim of this research into explosive weapons characteristics and their immediate, destructive effects on humans and structures, is to help inform the ongoing discussions on EWIPA, intended to reduce harm to civilians. The intention of the research is not to discuss the moral, political or legal implications of using explosive weapon systems in populated areas, but to examine their characteristics, effects and use from a technical perspective. The research project started in January 2015 and was guided and advised by a group of 18 international experts dealing with weapons-related research and practitioners who address the implications of explosive weapons in the humanitarian, policy, advocacy and legal fields. This report and its annexes integrate the research efforts of the characterisation of explosive weapons (CEW) project in 2015-2016 and make reference to key information sources in this domain.
  • Dual Class Companies List

    Dual Class Companies List

    Dual Class Companies List The following US-incorporated, Russell 3000 companies have at least two outstanding classes of common stock with unequal voting rights as of March 2017. Primary Company Name Unequal Voting Structure Ticker Class A: 1 vote per share 1-800-FLOWERS.COM FLWS Class B: 10 votes per share Class A Common: 1 A. O. Smith AOS Common: 1/10 Time-phased voting: Aflac AFL 1 vote per share until stock held for 4 years, then 10 votes per share Class A: 1 Albany International AIN Class B: 10 Class A: 1 Alphabet GOOGL Class B: 10 Class C: no votes Class A: 1 AMC Entertainment Holdings AMC Class B: 3 Class A: 1; elects 25% of board AMC Networks AMCX Class B: 10; elects 75% of board Class A: 1 Ameresco AMRC Class B: 5 Class A: 1 American Homes 4 Rent AMH Class B: 50 Class A: 1/10; elects 25% of board American Software AMSWA Class B: 1; elects 75% of board Class A: 1 AppFolio APPF Class B: 10 Primary Company Name Unequal Voting Structure Ticker Class A: 1 Apptio APTI Class B: 10 Class A: no votes Artesian Resources ARTNA Class B: 1 Class A: 1 Artisan Partners Asset Management APAM Class B: 5 Class A: 1 Ascent Capital Group ASCMA Class B: 10 Class A: 1 Associated Capital Group AC Class B: 10 Common: 1 Astronics ATRO Class B Common: 10 Class A: 1 Baldwin & Lyons BWINB Class B: no votes Class A: 1 Bel Fuse BELFB Class B: no votes Class A: 1 Berkshire Hathaway BRK.B Class B: 1/10,000 Class A: 1 BGC Partners BGCP Class B: 10 Class A: 1/10 Bio-Rad Laboratories BIO Class B: 1 Class A: 1 Box BOX Class B: 10 Class A Nonvoting: no votes Brady
  • WELCOME to the WORLD of ETSI an Overview of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute

    WELCOME to the WORLD of ETSI an Overview of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute

    WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF ETSI An overview of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved European roots, global outreach ETSI is a world-leading standards developing organization for Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Founded initially to serve European needs, ETSI has become highly- respected as a producer of technical standards for worldwide use © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved Products & services Technical specifications and standards with global application Support to industry and European regulation Specification & testing methodologies Interoperability testing © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved Membership Over 800 companies, big and small, from 66 countries on 5 continents Manufacturers, network operators, service and content providers, national administrations, ministries, universities, research bodies, consultancies, user organizations A powerful and dynamic mix of skills, resources and ambitions © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved Independence Independent of all other organizations and structures Respected for neutrality and trustworthiness Esteemed for our world-leading Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved Collaboration Strategic collaboration with numerous global and regional standards-making organizations and industry groupings Formally recognized as a European Standards Organization, with a global perspective Contributing technical standards to support regulation Defining radio frequency requirements for