DOCSLIB.ORG

1. What Do You Think Are the Top Issues Facing District 2 and How Would You Approach Each of Them?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. What Do You Think Are the Top Issues Facing District 2 and How Would You Approach Each of Them? 1. What do you think are the top issues facing District 2 and how would you approach each of them? Housing affordability tops my list of issues for Salt Lake City and is acutely felt in District Two. One of the attractive features of District Two in general and Fairpark in particular was the ability to live close to downtown without paying downtown prices. The population increase coupled with lower amounts of housing stock has raised prices to the extent there’s no price benefit to purchasing in District Two any more. Rents have also gone up dramatically. While historically low interest rates have kept mortgage payments at a reasonable level, despite the huge increase in prices, renters haven’t received the same benefit. In District Two, there are 14 homes for sale as of this writing. The average price for 84116 is $315,850 and 84104 is $329,366. In multiple offer situations, which nearly all homes undergo right now, the winning bid can be $30,000 plus over list. The drastic shortage of homes and high prices is keeping sellers out of the market because they’re afraid they won’t be able to find their next home. This logjam on the property ladder has created an unhealthy market that’s expensive and frustrating. There are a number of possible solutions to this issue and a number of policy stances that could be taken. Cities typically wield a policy stance with a “carrot or stick” approach. I prefer the carrot. When it comes to transit oriented development, we need to incentivize the development of ownership housing products like condominiums and townhouses. One of the lasting repercussions of the Great Recession is a massive disincentive to build condos across the country. Young people and first time homebuyers have driven demand for this product type, yet few new build options exist. Building a high percentage of apartments in District Two is laying the foundation for a transient resident base and decreased funding for public schools. In a free market, naturally occurring affordable housing isn’t going to happen. As the zoning authority and regulator for any new construction, the City must require affordable housing to be part of every new housing project. I believe the number should be 10% at a minimum and could look like units in multi-family projects, ADUs in single family homes or a 10% premium fee in high cost neighborhoods where neither units or ADUs are feasible. This fee should go directly to schools and housing assistance programs to the City. Salt Lake City led Utah in establishing an accessory dwelling unit ordinance in 2018, yet the number of those units actually built has been insufficient. Only six ADUs have been built since the ordinance passed. While more applications are in the pipeline, ADUs alone won’t address the housing issue. There are a number of barriers including a conditional use application process which requires lengthy Planning Commission approval and high fees. ADU permitting fees are similar to building an entire house. The passage of HB82 in this last legislative session provides financial assistance in constructing ADUs for lower income home owners or for those intending to rent their ADU to lower income residents. Salt Lake City could implement an ADU financing program through Housing and Neighborhood Development, lower its permitting fees and develop an ADU information campaign to make residents aware of how our ADU process works. Finally, we have to look at zoning and incremental, “makes sense” density opportunities for all new construction in the City. If there’s room on a lot for two units instead of one, shouldn’t we take that opportunity? In light of changing retail and office trends, are there instances where converting or redeveloping underused commercial space into housing would be the better choice? Won’t more mixed use development with vertical growth be more cost effective, sustainable and benefit our communities than relying on the standard single family home? These are just a few of the things we need to think about as Salt Lake addresses this issue. Continuing on the theme of affordable housing, I also think development is a critical issue for District Two. This is a concern reaching much more than just housing. Development covers the issues of the new prison, the Inland Port, transit oriented development zones and housing. The North Temple corridor is the only TOD zone in District Two and it’s just barely starting to develop in a meaningful way. I’m concerned about the clustering of rental products and small, micro units. The City needs to create ways to get ownership products and family size units. In today’s high cost environment for building materials and labor, the way to get that will be through incentives. The City can use the tool of deed restriction to maintain those incentive investments for perpetuity. Priority needs to be placed on City projects like the Folsom Trail which has been in development for nearly 20 years without a single shovel turning dirt. The blight in that corridor has contributed to delays in realizing the full potential of the North Temple RDA project area. Crime is on the rise in Salt Lake City. Anecdotally I see it on Nextdoor and Facebook community pages every day. Package theft, car break ins, car theft and other property crimes are the most mentioned. I see it on North Temple with the number of businesses with broken windows and the businesses that have left. I’ve spoken to the business owners and managers on North Temple and heard about the product theft and violent attacks on staff in the stores. They’ve told me about drug overdose deaths in their store bathrooms and parking lots. Many of those crimes are completely under-reported. The reported crime confirms this narrative. In 2020, c rime city wide was up over 20% for both violent crimes and property crimes. District Two saw a 29.5% increase for both categories with a staggering 92.5% increase in vehicle larceny, the most of any district in the City. Personally, I’ve had items go missing from my yard, found used needles on the other side of my back fence and caught someone using my backyard as their personal store. There are a number of factors affecting this increase in crime including the pandemic which affected jail holding policy. Another factor was bail reform legislation that drastically reduced bail amounts for felony charges. Strained police resources brought on by quarantine guidelines, Covid cases among staff and large scale civil unrest last Spring and Summer also contributed. Criminals were emboldened by the perception of light consequences for their behavior. Large camps developed around the City with criminals exploiting drug addicts, the mentally ill and the unsheltered. It’s a counter social system that creates a sense of community for those in it that’s difficult to leave. This is a complex problem requiring a united front from the City, County, State and residents. As a resident and community leader in Fairpark, I was part of a series of weekly meetings with various community stakeholders trying to address this issue. As we quarantined in our homes, the lawless took over the streets. Councilmember Johnston started street corner meetings on North Temple. We met with police, councilmembers, County and State officials to come up with solutions to the problems. They included implementing no loitering signs on 800 West grassy medians, bringing business trespassing signs into police registry for enforcement and garbage cleanups. One of the things police officials and recovering drug addicts often mention is it’s the criminal justice system that gets them into treatment. Our current policy of “catch and release” policing isn’t benefiting the community. Solutions to the crime issue have to include a stop to “catch and release” jailing. I propose opening an outdoor detainment facility at the Oxbow jail on a temporary basis so the jail has Covid safe holding facilities and criminals face consequences and have opportunities for drug treatment. Bail reform saw some adjustment in this year’s legislative session and I will closely watch how that plays out in real time. We need to better educate residents on how to protect their property. When I had items stolen from my yard, it motivated me to better clean and organize my property. I placed all tools in my locked garage and cleaned up so I could quickly identify if I had things missing. (Retail stores use the same tactic to reduce shoplifting.) I also installed motion lights and LED bulbs for all my outdoor lighting. I’m conscious about items I leave in my car and make sure to hide any valuables I can’t secure inside my house. I never leave my car running unattended. Solving the homeless issue will continue to be expensive and require coordination and resources from the State and County. The creation of affordable housing I touched on earlier will incrementally address it, but it won’t be fast enough. I support the idea of a tiny home community operated by the Other Side Academy for the purpose of housing and treating drug addicts. I support the idea of single room occupancy housing with onsite case management for the purpose of helping the disabled and mentally ill. I support the idea of incentivizing landlords to accept homeless individuals with housing vouchers. I support the idea of the City establishing alternate ways to establish consumer credit tradelines like a registry of on-time rent payers or utility payments. I support the idea of reimagining incentives for homeless service providers to shift from the number of people helped towards the number of people who stay housed, employed or substance free after going through the provider’s program.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Our Mission
    Kentucky Transportation Center Research Report KTC -14-11/MTIC1-14-1F Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Our Mission We provide services to the transportation community through research, technology transfer and education. We create and participate in partnerships to promote safe and effective transportation systems. © 2014 University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Center Information may not be used, reproduced, or republished without our written consent. Kentucky Transportation Center 176 Oliver H. Raymond Building Lexington, KY 40506-0281 (859) 257-4513 fax (859) 257-1815 www.ktc.uky.edu Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Prepared for: Multimodal Transportation & Infrastructure Consortium by the Kentucky Transportation Center 11/21/2014 This Page Left Intentionally Blank. Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Authors: Principal Investigator: Doug Kreis, PE, MBA, PMP Researcher(s): Sarah McCormack, MSc, CTL Research Engineer Christopher Van Dyke, MA Research Analyst Bryan Gibson, PhD Research Associate Multimodal Transportation and Infrastructure Consortium P.O. Box 5425 Huntington, WV 25703-0425 Phone: (304) 696-2313 • Fax: (304) 696-6088 Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes
    [Show full text]
  • SEASONS: the 2012 Annual Report for the City of Greer
    TEAM GREER SEASONS: The 2012 Annual Report for the City of Greer The City of Greer, South Carolina Founded: 1876 Population: 25,515 (2010 Census) Government: Council City Administrator: Edward Driggers Mayor: Rick Danner City Council: Jay Arrowood Wayne Griffin* Kimberly Bookert Lee Dumas Wryley Bettis Judy Albert * - Mayor pro tempore Area: Total 21.76 square miles Land 19.99 square miles Water 1.77 square mile Elevation 1,024 ft. Departments: Administration Building and Development Standards Fire Municipal Court Parks and Recreation Police Public Services Fiscal Year 2012 Budget: $17,588,375 Greer City Council District Representatives DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 6 Jay Wayne Kimberly Lee Wryley Judy Arrowood Griffin Bookert Dumas Bettis Albert CONTENTS 9 6 New Map Caps Redistricting Process After seven months of work and public discussion about the 10 redistricting process, Greer City Council successfully completed the arduous task with the Department of Justice’s approval. 7 Transit Oriented Development 101 A national planner helped Upstate elected officials, planners, and residents consider the future of the Highway 29 corridor. 11 14 8 Students Connect with Upstate Soldiers Soldiers in Kosovo received a special Thanksgiving greeting from a group of young artists and wordsmiths in Greer. 9 Concussion Training for Coaches Injuries are nothing new to NFL players and concussions are at the top of the list. What happens when youth league 20 players emulate their heroes when it comes to taking hits? 10 City Website Among ‘Best of the Best’ Departmental Reports A new design and creative features helped the City of Greer 22 Finance website earn honors from the Horizon Interactive Awards.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Port Zoning Modifications Per HB 2001
    Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Daniel Echeverria, [email protected], 801-535-7165 Tracy Tran, [email protected], 801-535-7645 Date: September 26, 2018 Re: PLNPCM2018-00601 Inland Port Text Amendments Zoning Text Amendment PROPERTY ADDRESS: Multiple PARCEL ID: Multiple MASTER PLAN: Northwest Quadrant, Northwest ZONING DISTRICT: Multiple REQUEST: A proposal by Mayor Jackie Biskupski to modify zoning requirements related to inland port land uses as required by Utah Code 11-58-205(5). This statute gives the City until December 31, 2018 to allow an inland port and associated uses as permitted or conditional uses subject to standards that are determined by the municipality and consistent with the policies and objectives of the inland port authority. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis and findings of this report, it is the opinion of staff that the proposed zoning text amendments meet the standards for a zoning ordinance amendment. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a favorable recommendation of petition PLNPCM2018-00601 to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: A. Inland Port Jurisdictional Lands and Zoning Map B. Proposed Inland Port Overlay Zoning Ordinance Text C. Northwest Quadrant Overlay Zoning for Reference D. Conditional Use Standards for Reference E. M-1 Zoning District Land Use Table for Reference F. Analysis of Standards G. Department Review Comments H. Suggested Lighting Ordinance (from David Scheer) I. Public Process and Comments SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLCGOV.COM PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLNPCM2018-00601 1 Date Published: 9/20/2018 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This zoning text amendment proposal was initiated by Mayor Jackie Biskupski in response to the State Legislature adopting modifications to Utah Code 11-58 “Utah Inland Port Authority Act” (HB2001) during a special session of the legislature held in July 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Job Creation Factors for Inland and Near Dock Intermodal Facilities
    Job Creation Factors for Inland and Near Dock Intermodal Facilities Chad Miller1, Brian Richard2, MD Sarder3,Tulio Sulbaran4, and Martin Lipinski5 1,2,3,4University of Southern Mississippi Center of Logistics, Trade, and Transportation 118 College Ave. #5022 Hattiesburg, MS 39406 (601) 266-6666; fax (601) 266-6071; email [email protected] 5University of Memphis Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute 3815 Central Ave, Memphis, TN 38152 (901) 678-3279; fax (901) 678-0404; email [email protected] ABSTRACT The major driving forces behind the establishment of intermodal facilities include number of jobs that will be created by the facility, freight performance improvement, and other economic benefits to the region. Job creation is the most tangible benefit that stakeholders use to justify the development of such facilities. This project explores different job creation factors for intermodal facilities in terms of facility types, management structures, financing options, and activitiesperformed. Near port and hinterland type facilities are analyzed separately. This project tests several hypotheses statistically to find the correlations among different job creation factors. The result shows that the public landlord model facility creates more jobs than the private operator model. The result also shows that facilities connected with well-established transportation network systems usually produce more jobs. INTRODUCTION In today’s growing global economy, intermodal facilities have become increasingly popular as a method of increasing efficiency and decreasing costs across the entire spectrum of supply chain operations. Regions across the country are seeking to establish intermodal facilities as a means to fostereconomic development and jobs. In order for a facility to be considered intermodal it must be accessible by more than one mode of transportation such as truck, rail, ship/barge, or plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Corners Intermodal Transloading Equinox 4Cite
    FOUR CORNERS INTERMODAL TRANSLOADING EQUINOX 4CITE Final November 2016 4CITE Public Involvement Plan October, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Scenario C .................................................................................................................................... 15 Scenario D .................................................................................................................................... 15 Scenario E .................................................................................................................................... 15 Project Overview ................................................................................................................................ 1 C. Scenario Network Performance ................................................................................................... 15 A. Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Analysis Assumptions ................................................................................................................... 15 B. Study Area ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Level of Service Methodology ....................................................................................................... 19 Stakeholder and Public Outreach ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Engagement Report Inland Port Proposed Zoning Modifications Qualtrics Survey Results
    Engagement Report Inland Port Proposed Zoning Modifications Qualtrics Survey Results Considering Typical uses of an inland port: · Rail lines that transfer freight to another mode of transportation, such as trucks · Large cranes that move freight between different transportation modes and temporary storage · Warehouses and distribution centers · Manufacturing facilities · Temporary storage of goods and materials awaiting distribution Do you see potential impacts to: Air Quality Yes No 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 96.06% 390 2 No 3.94% 16 406 1 Do you see potential impacts to: Water, Sewer, or other Public Utilities Yes No 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 89.37% 353 2 No 10.63% 42 395 2 Sensitive Natural Environments Yes No 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 89.00% 356 2 No 11.00% 44 400 3 Salt Lake City Neighborhoods Yes No 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 77.63% 302 2 No 22.37% 87 389 4 Do you have any other potential impacts you are concerned about? Not enough transparency the state doing whatever it wants w/o regard to the city or its residents Who benefits from the proposed “economic development”? Growth is to large for our area. We want a good area to enjoy. Increased population in valley, increased GHG emissions how it was created, who is on the boards, the facts that meetings are nt open My community has been footing the bill for all these public utility upgrades they say are required anyway but likely would not be.
    [Show full text]
  • SLC 2019 Resident Survey Results
    SALT LAKE CITY RESIDENT SURVEY OFFICIAL 2019 SURVEY OF SALT LAKE CITY RESIDENTS 1. Salt Lake City residents consistently report a high quality of life over time. 2. On average, residents rank investing in affordable housing programs as their highest priority city initiative. 3. 95% of respondents rank improving air quality as their highest environmental priority. 4. A majority of respondents believe Salt Lake City has job opportunities for them, but they also believe that the City can do more to attract businesses. 5. A plurality of residents would prefer to receive information regarding SLC via email. Fewer than a quarter report following the City’s social media accounts. 6. There is currently a general lack of knowledge regarding the Inland Port Project. Residents who follow the city’s social media accounts and use the city website report greater understanding of what the project is. 7. Favorability of the port is heavily divided with an average score of 42 on a scale of 0-100. Currently, greater understanding of the port is associated with less favorable opinions of it. 7FINDINGS TO REMEMBER SURVEY OBJECTIVES RESEARCH GOALS § Track approval of the City and the services it offers over time § Evaluate neighborhood perceptions regarding safety and city maintenance § Explore residents’ priorities regarding current City initiatives, including attitudes about public transit and the conditions of streets and roads § Examine from which communication channels residents most commonly receive information about the City and which modes they would prefer § Quantify understanding of and attitudes toward the Utah Inland Port SURVEY METHODOLOGY SAMPLING, MODE, & MARGIN OF ERROR § 1,297 residents within the boundaries of Salt Lake City participated in this survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Port Logistics Center Road Improvements
    IInnllaanndd PPoorrtt LLooggiissttiiccss CCeenntteerr RRooaadd IImmpprroovveemmeennttss D.O.T. National Infrastructure Investments FY2016 TIGER VIII Discretionary Grant Program Application TIGER VIII DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION PROJECT TITLE: INLAND PORT LOGISTICS CENTER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TYPE OF PROJECT: Road – New Capacity TYPE OF APPLICATION: Capital APPLICANT: CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY Local Government LOCATION OF PROJECT: Cocoa, Florida 32926 Brevard County Congressional District: FL‐15th District PROJECT AREA: Urban Area AMOUNT OF TIGER FUNDS REQUESTED: $9,672,638 APPLICATION AND PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION: Captain John W. Murray Chief Executive Officer Phone: (321) 783‐7831 Extension 233 Fax: (321) 783‐4651 Email: [email protected] Canaveral Port Authority 445 Challenger Road, Suite 301 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Table of Contents I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 3 II. PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................. 4 III. PROJECT PARTIES ................................................................................................................. 7 IV. GRANT FUNDS AND SOURCES/USES OF PROJECT FUNDS ................................................ 8 V. SELECTION CRITERIA ............................................................................................................ 8 A. Primary Criteria ‐ LONG‐TERM OUTCOMES ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central New York Inland Port Market Feasibility Study
    FINAL REPORT CENTRAL NEW YORK INLAND PORT MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY potenti PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUBMITTED BY: RSG CENTRAL NEW YORK INLAND PORT MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose and Background ................................................................................................................ 1 Principal Findings ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 6 2.1 | Physical Requirements .................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 | Central New York Inland Port Proposals: History ......................................................................... 7 3.0 INFORMATION SOURCES .............................................................................................................. 8 4.0 TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS .................................................. 10 4.1 | Rail Service ................................................................................................................................. 10 4.2 | Highway ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal & Logistics
    Intermodal & Logistics Winter 2019-2020 Market Scope 5 Current Market Trends The intermodal and logistics market is a dynamic and 1. Market Faces Urban Challenges: Largely due to the growing one, with various types of facilities, including rise of e-commerce and next-day delivery, our freight marine terminals, rail terminals, depots and container infrastructure is under strain. Shipments in 2018 grew yards, inland ports, freight airport terminals, and industrial 5.6% from 2017, setting a fifth volume record in the real estate located adjacent to intermodal facilities. last six years, according to the Intermodal Association Many facilities are like mini-cities, and a wide range of North America. Because many packages are now of engineering design services are required for their destined for individual residences, challenges extend creation and expansion, including land development, to not only those of the "last mile" but also the "final transportation, mechanical/electrical/plumbing, structural, fifty feet". As a result, smaller warehouses are being environmental, geotechnical, and water-related design. Continued on next page With more than 2,200 facilities, the North American intermodal market is the largest in the world. Top 10 Truck Bottlenecks in U.S. Peak Peak Avg. Avg. Top Clients Avg. Speed % Rank Location Speed Speed Change Major clients in this market sector contract with (mph) (mph) 2018- engineering firms directly, often using master service 2019 agreement-type contracts. These clients include: 1 Fort Lee, NJ: I-95 at SR 4 31.7 23.0 -7.65% 1. Ports: There are more than 300 ports in the United 2 Atlanta, GA: I-285 at I-85N 34.8 22.9 -7.35% States (source: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis
    Utah Inland Port - Feasibility Analysis prepared for World Trade Center - Utah Utah Governor's Office of Economic Development prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc Global Logistics Development Partners, Inc www.camsys.com report Utah Inland Port - Feasibility Analysis prepared for World Trade Center - Utah & Utah Governor's Office of Economic Development prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 115 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60603 Global Logistics Development Partners 14362 N. Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd. Suite 1000 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 USA date December 29, 2017 Utah Inland Port - Feasibility Analysis Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 2-7 Summary of Recommendations: .............................................................. 2-8 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2-14 2.0 Inland Port Typology ....................................................................................... 2-17 2.1 What is an Inland Port?............................................................................ 2-17 2.2 Where are Existing Inland Ports? ........................................................... 2-17 Inland Port Types ..................................................................................... 2-17 Port Profile: DuisburgPort ....................................................................... 2-19 Port Profile: CentrePort Canada
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Community-Port Collaboration Resources to Address Diesel
    Helping Ports Providing Tools EPA Community-Port Capitalize on to Help Identify Funding for Clean Smart Infrastructure Collaboration Resources to Technologies Investments Address Diesel Pollution Promoting Port Community Increasing Collaboration Efficiency in Federal for Effective Planning Government and Webinar Port Operations April 9, 2021 Creating a Knowledge Clearinghouse 1 Accessing Spanish Interpretation for Today’s Webinar / EPA Para acceder a la presentacin en espaol PORTS INITIATIVE • Eberá descargar la aplicacin “Zoom” y unirse al seminario web usando la aplicacin (y no la versin en línea). • Debe usar el audio de su computadora o su teléfono inteligente (no seleccione las opciones 'marcar' o 'llamarme' en su teléfono mvil). Computer Instructions Smartphone Instructions 1.In your meeting/webinar controls, click Interpretation. 1. In your meeting controls, tap the ellipses icon (...). 2. Tap Language Interpretation. Click Spanish option. Language Interpretation Done 2.Click Spanish option. Original Audio English Italian 3. (Optional) Tap the toggle to Mute Original Audio. 3.(Optional) To hear Spanish-only, click Mute Original Audio. Mut e Original Aud·o 4. Click Done. 2 EPA PORTS Other Logistics for Today’s Webinar INITIATIVE • Attendees will be muted during the presentation • Questions • Anytime during webinar: send questions to “Host” via chat box. • Q/A at the end of presentation: “raise your hand” if you would like to offer a question verbally. • After the webinar: email [email protected] • Note: • Slides will be posted
    [Show full text]