Treating Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Treating Generalized Anxiety Disorder Jack M. Gorman Treating Generalized Anxiety Disorder Jack M. Gorman, M.D. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is characterized by chronically persistent worry and therefore requires effective long-term treatment. This article reviews the benefits and risks associated with various pharmacologic and psychological therapies to assess their ability to achieve the elimination of GAD symptomatology and restoration of normal function. Psychotherapeutic approaches such as applied relaxation, cognitive therapy, and cognitive-behavioral therapy have all been shown to be effective when used as monotherapies and may be beneficial when used adjunctively. Current effec- tive pharmacotherapies for patients with GAD include anxiolytic benzodiazepines, buspirone, and an- tidepressants including venlafaxine and paroxetine. Benzodiazepines have long been used to treat anxiety and are particularly appropriate in short-term treatment situations; however, their adverse side-effect profile and their inability to treat depression commonly comorbid with GAD renders them less than ideal in many situations. Buspirone has demonstrated anxiolytic benefits but, like ben- zodiazepines, shows negligible antidepressant action. Antidepressants like paroxetine and venlafaxine are not only effective antidepressants but also effective anxiolytics, thus implying their special ability to treat GAD and concurrent depression, even over the long-term. (J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64[suppl 2]:24–29) eneralized anxiety disorder (GAD) did not become of normal functioning. Although treatment may be com- Gformally diagnosable until 1980 with the publica- plicated by the presence of other psychiatric disorders, tion of the DSM-III. Current DSM-IV diagnostic criteria achieving these treatment goals may decrease the rate include excessive anxiety and worry occurring more days of overutilization of medical services and the occurrence than not for at least 6 months, or trouble controlling exces- of other disorders, but research has yet to confirm this sive worry and anxiety, among others. Despite using dif- hypothesis. This article will review treatment options cur- ferent diagnostic criteria, 2 major epidemiologic surveys rently available to physicians treating GAD and preview found comparable 1-year and lifetime prevalence rates potential future treatments. Current options include vari- in the United States. Data from the Epidemiologic Catch- ous kinds of psychotherapy and a battery of pharmaco- ment Area (ECA) using DSM-III diagnostic criteria therapy classes such as benzodiazepines, azapirones, and showed 1-year prevalence rates of 2.0% to 3.5% and life- antidepressants, among others. This article will also ex- time prevalence rates of 4.1% to 6.6%. Data from the amine how the use of diagnosis and treatment guidelines National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) using DSM-III-R such as algorithms may facilitate implementation of treat- criteria observed similar prevalence rates: 3.1% 1-year ment and the goal of eliminating symptoms and restoring prevalence and 5.1% lifetime prevalence (Figure 1).1 functionality. Despite indications of substantial prevalence, GAD often goes undiagnosed.2 Patients diagnosed with the disorder PSYCHOTHERAPY tend to exhibit chronic functional impairment, seek gen- eral medical services at an elevated rate, and develop Patients with GAD tend to have cognitive abnor- comorbid psychiatric disorders.1 malities that hinder their ability to effectively deal with Effective treatment should ultimately aim at the elimi- symptoms associated with GAD and other aspects of their nation of anxiety symptoms and the complete restoration environment. For example, in patients with GAD, worry impedes the normal processing of information when atten- tion, memory, or problem solving faculties are employed.3 As a result, patients with GAD are more likely to incor- From the Department of Psychiatry, Mt. Sinai School of rectly interpret external stimuli as dangerous or threaten- Medicine, New York, NY. ing,4 regard unlikely events as likely,5 or manifest these This article is derived from the teleconference “Treating symptoms somatically through inordinate muscle tension. Depression and Anxiety to Remission: Use of Algorithms,” which was held April 17, 2002, and supported by an Psychotherapy is designed to help patients develop cog- unrestricted educational grant from Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. nitive or behavioral strategies to effectively manage both Corresponding author: Jack M. Gorman, M.D., Department of Psychiatry, Mt. Sinai Medical School, One Gustave L. Levy cognitive and somatic symptoms that impede normal Place, Box 1230, New York, NY 10029. functionality. 24 © COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, INC. © COPYRIGHT 2003 PHYSICIANSJ Clin PsychiatryPOSTGRADUATE 2003;64 PRESS (suppl, INC 2). Treatment of GAD Figure 1. 1-Year and Lifetime Prevalence Rates of GAD in the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system at the GABAA the Epidemiologic Catchment Survey and National receptor complex, which leads to reduced neural transmis- Comorbidity Surveya sion throughout the central nervous system.10 Benzodiaze- pines can be short-acting or long-acting, and both kinds Epidemiologic Catchment National Comorbidity Survey Survey have been shown to have a rapid onset of anxiolytic action 7 7 in patients with GAD.11,12 However, their role in long-term Los Angeles, CA St. Louis, MO treatment of anxiety disorders is limited, given evidence 6 6 Durham, NC that more than one third of those treated with benzodiaze- 13 5 5 pines will not remit and, some, but by no means all, stud- ies have found that their effect does not differ significantly 4 4 from placebo after the initial 4 to 6 weeks of treatment.7,14 Failure of benzodiazepines to produce remission in 3 3 a substantial number of patients renders their use difficult Prevalence (%) Prevalence Prevalence (%) Prevalence 2 2 to recommend especially given modern commitments to the higher treatment standard of symptom elimination. In 1 1 addition, benzodiazepines do not effectively ameliorate the principal cognitive symptom of GAD, namely worry, 0 0 1-Year Lifetime 1-Year Lifetime despite being able to positively impact the somatic mani- Prevalence Prevalence Prevalence Prevalence festations of anxiety.11,15,16 Also, benzodiazepines fail to aAdapted with permission from Wittchen et al.1 reduce depressive symptoms and in some cases even exac- erbate them,17 an especially pressing limitation given the high rate at which GAD and depression occur comorbidly. Early psychosocial therapies targeted the somatic Benzodiazepines have also been associated with ad- manifestations of anxiety, such as increased physical ten- verse cognitive side effects such as sedation, hypnotic ef- sion, through relaxation techniques.6 However, Borkovec fects, and motor impairment.12 Abuse among those treated and Whisman7 concluded that cognitive-behavioral ther- with benzodiazepines is uncommon10 and patients treated apy (CBT) produced clinically and statistically significant with benzodiazepines over an extended period of time benefits that were sustained for 6 to 12 months. They also rarely increase the dose due to diminished efficacy.18 found that using relaxation therapy in conjunction with However, the potential exists for patients to develop a cognitive therapy frequently reduced the need for medica- physical dependence on benzodiazepines and withdrawal tions and produced the greatest degree of benefit among symptoms upon discontinuation, especially if the discon- compared psychotherapies. A review of studies by Fisher tinuation is abrupt.12 and Durham8 found recovery rates at a 6-month follow-up between 50% and 60% among patients treated with CBT Buspirone or applied relaxation. Using psychotherapy and pharmaco- The azapirone class of medications, which includes bu- therapy in conjunction has shown potential as a treatment spirone, is pharmacologically and structurally distinct of depression,9 so it is possible that a similar strategy may from the benzodiazepines, but, like the benzodiazepines, also be effective in the treatment of GAD. possesses anxiolytic properties. Although the mechanisms of action of the azapirones are incompletely understood, it PHARMACOTHERAPIES has been hypothesized that they function through a reduc- tion of the firing of serotonin-affected nerve fibers by In addition to psychotherapies, physicians have at their means of presynaptic serotonin agonism.19 disposal numerous effective pharmacologic treatments. Among patients with GAD, buspirone has been associ- Recently developed drugs have been shown to be not only ated with reductions in levels of anxiety comparable to more effective than placebo, but also safer and more toler- reductions associated with benzodiazepines.20–24 Despite able than the older medications such as benzodiazepines. comparable efficacy, buspirone tends to have a slower on- Also, current research into the biological mechanisms of set of action than benzodiazepines, often taking 2 weeks GAD is beginning to be converted into potential future or more to manifest efficacy.20–24 Buspirone, unlike benzo- therapies. diazepines, affects the cognitive aspects of GAD15 but does not impair cognitive or psychomotor function or Benzodiazepines induce sedation, muscle relaxation, or withdrawal syn- Benzodiazepines have been used since the 1960s drome.17,19 However, buspirone has been associated with because of their anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, and muscle adverse effects such as dizziness, headache, and nausea.19 relaxant properties.
Recommended publications
  • 52Nd Annual Meeting
    ACNP 52nd Annual Meeting Final Program December 8-12, 2013 The Westin Diplomat Resort & Spa Hollywood, Florida President: David A. Lewis, M.D. Program Committee Chair: Randy D. Blakely, Ph.D. Program Committee Co-Chair: Pat R. Levitt, Ph.D. This meeting is jointly sponsored by the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry and the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Dear ACNP Members and Guests, It is a distinct pleasure to welcome you to the 2014 meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology! This 52nd annual meeting will again provide opportunities for the exercise of the College’s core values: the spirit of Collegiality, promoting in each other the best in science, training and service; participation in Community, pursuing together the goals of understanding the neurobiology of brain diseases and eliminating their burden on individuals and our society; and engaging in Celebration, taking the time to recognize and enjoy the contributions and accomplishments of our members and guests. Under the excellent leadership of Randy Blakely and Pat Levitt, the Program Committee has done a superb job in assembling an outstanding slate of scientific presentations. Based on membership feedback, the meeting schedule has been designed with the goals of achieving an optimal mix of topics and types of sessions, increasing the diversity of participating scientists and creating more time for informal interactions. The presentations will highlight both the breadth of the investigative interests of ACNP membership
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Project: Pharmacological and Toxicological Investigations of New Psychoactive Substances, Supervised by Prof
    PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von Dino Lüthi aus Rüderswil, Bern Basel, 2018 Originaldokument gespeichert auf dem Dokumentenserver der Universität Basel edoc.unibas.ch Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung-Nicht kommerziell 4.0 International Lizenz (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.de). Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät auf Antrag von Prof. Stephan Krähenbühl, Prof. Matthias E. Liechti und Prof. Anne Eckert. Basel, den 26.06.2018 Prof. Martin Spiess Dekan der Philosophisch- Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES “An adult must make his own decision as to whether or not he should expose himself to a specific drug, be it available by prescription or proscribed by law, by measuring the potential good and bad with his own personal yardstick.” ― Alexander Shulgin, Pihkal: A Chemical Love Story. PREFACE This thesis is split into a pharmacology part and a toxicology part. The pharmacology part consists of investigations on the monoamine transporter and receptor interactions of traditional and newly emerged drugs, mainly stimulants and psychedelics; the toxicology part consists of investigations on mechanisms of hepatocellular toxicity of synthetic cathinones. All research described in this thesis has been published in peer-reviewed journals, and was performed between October 2014 and June 2018 in the Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology at the Department of Biomedicine of the University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, and partly at the pRED Roche Innovation Center Basel at F.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2011/064769 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date t 3 June 2011 (03.06.2011) WO 201 1/064769 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 9/00 (2006.01) A61K 31/506 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 9/70 (2006.01) A61P 5/24 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, (21) International Application Number: DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/IL20 10/000976 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 22 November 2010 (22.1 1.2010) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (25) Filing Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, (26) Publication Language: English TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/264,025 24 November 2009 (24.1 1.2009) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): YIS- ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, SUM RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, ΓΓ, LT, LU, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Medications in Canine Behavior Therapy
    PEER REVIEWED ON YOUR BEST BEHAVIOR The Use of Medications in Q & A:Canine Behavior Therapy Ilana Reisner, DVM, PhD, Diplomate ACVB Reisner Veterinary Behavior & Consulting Services, Media, Pennsylvania our longtime client, Mrs. Jones, presents Addressing Client Buttercup, the Papillon, with “a behavior Reluctance Y problem”: For several months, Buttercup has If behavioral medication been biting houseguests. Through questioning and is indicated, but the client is reluctant, discuss- ing specific concerns educates the client about the observation, you determine that Buttercup is anxious. benefits of medication. Common concerns include: She was “shy” as a puppy, exhibits fearful postures 1. My pet’s much-loved personality will change. when unfamiliar people try to pet her, and—as a This is not the goal. The only personality charac- teristics targeted for change with drug therapy are home video of her behavior reveals—runs away from those associated with anxiety and reactivity, or guests trying to interact with her. such problems as repetitive (compulsive) behavior. Because psychopharmacology can have unexpect- ed effects—for example, one client reported that The presentation of behavior problems during routine her dog seemed less inclined to play with toys after appointments is one of the inevitabilities of today’s vet- administration of a drug—it is also important to erinary practice. Behavioral drugs can help manage reassure the client that his or her pet’s response will these problems—but not all drugs are equally useful, be monitored, and the medication effects can be and their use is not always indicated. The plot thickens reversed or limited by reducing the dose or switch- when some clients demand medication, while others re- ing to a different drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalised Anxiety Disorder
    Generalised Anxiety Disorder The evolution of the evidence Chris Gale Revised for Psychiatry Trainees, June 2011 Hypotheses GAD is a not uncommon cause of disability, but GAD is commonly missed. Most studies are of patients without co- morbidity, (which are the minority). Evidence base analysis is dependent on the studies used. The data set for this group of patients is now reasonably rich, however, the application of this data set is problematic. Hypothesis one. Generalized anxiety disorder has a community 12 month prevelence in the range 1-4%. GAD is a significant cause of disability. However, it is highly co-morbid in 75-80% cases. It is therefore frequently diagnosed. Definition Ongoing anxiety, multiple events, disproportionate. Somatic symptoms. Causing subjective stress. 12-month prevalence Generalized Anxiety Disorder, National Surveys. Survey Diagnostic Total Male Female system. (95%CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) Te Rau DSM-IV 2.0 (1.7—2.3) 1.4 (1.1 – 1.8) 2.6 (2.2 –3.1) Hinegaro Germany DSM-IV 1.5 (1.2 – 1.9) 1.0 (0.6 – 1.5) 2.1 (1.5 – 2.8) Australia DSM-IV 2.7 (2.2-- 2.3) 2.0 (1.3 – 2.6) 3.5 (2.7 – 4.3) GAD or MDE have the equivalent effect on disability as ageing 12 years . Profiles of mean Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF–36) sub-scale scores according to the absence dark) or presence (light) of prevalent mood disorders (adjusted for age, gender and presence of any chronic medical conditions), sub-scales are: PF=Physical Functioning; RP, Role Physical; BP, Bodily Pain; GH, General Health; V, Vitality; SF, Social Functioning; RE, Role Emotional; MH, Mental Health.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuromodulators for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (Disorders of Gutlbrain Interaction): a Rome Foundation Working Team Report Douglas A
    Gastroenterology 2018;154:1140–1171 SPECIAL REPORT Neuromodulators for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (Disorders of GutLBrain Interaction): A Rome Foundation Working Team Report Douglas A. Drossman,1,2 Jan Tack,3 Alexander C. Ford,4,5 Eva Szigethy,6 Hans Törnblom,7 and Lukas Van Oudenhove8 1Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 2Center for Education and Practice of Biopsychosocial Care and Drossman Gastroenterology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 3Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 4Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; 5Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; 6Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 7Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; and 8Laboratory for BrainÀGut Axis Studies, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium BACKGROUND & AIMS: Central neuromodulators (antide- summary information and guidelines for the use of central pressants, antipsychotics, and other central nervous neuromodulators in the treatment of chronic gastrointestinal systemÀtargeted medications) are increasingly used for treat- symptoms and FGIDs. Further studies are needed to confirm ment
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacovigilance in Psychiatry Pharmacovigilance in Psychiatry
    Edoardo Spina Gianluca Trifi rò Editors Pharmacovigilance in Psychiatry Pharmacovigilance in Psychiatry Edoardo Spina • Gianluca Trifi rò Editors Pharmacovigilance in Psychiatry Editors Edoardo Spina Gianluca Trifi rò Department of Clinical and Experimental Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Medicine University of Messina University of Messina Messina Messina Italy Italy ISBN 978-3-319-24739-7 ISBN 978-3-319-24741-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24741-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015957257 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Anxiety Disorders, Obsessive– Compulsive Disorder and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Primary Care
    International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 2012; 16: 77–84 REVIEW ARTICLE Guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders, obsessive – compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care BORWIN BANDELOW 1 , LEO SHER 2 , ROBERTAS BUNEVICIUS 3 , ERIC HOLLANDER 2 , SIEGFRIED KASPER 4 , JOSEPH ZOHAR 5 , HANS-J Ü RGEN M Ö LLER 6 , WFSBP TASK FORCE ON MENTAL DISORDERS IN PRIMARY CARE a AND WFSBP TASK FORCE ON ANXIETY DISORDERS , OCD AND PTSD b 1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of G ö ttingen, Gö ttingen, Germany, 2 Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefi ore Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA, 3 Institute of Psychophysiology and Rehabilitation, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Palanga, Lithuania, 4 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 5 Division of Psychiatry, Chaim-Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel, and 6 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany Abstract Objective. Anxiety disorders are frequently under-diagnosed conditions in primary care, although they can be managed effectively by general practitioners. Methods. This paper is a short and practical summary of the World Federation of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders, obsessive– compulsive disorder (OCD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for the treatment in primary care. The recommendations were developed by a task force of 30 international experts in the fi eld and are based on randomized controlled studies. Results. First-line pharmacological treatments for these disorders are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (for all disor- ders), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (for some) and pregabalin (for generalized anxiety disorder only).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Different Groups of Medications
    LIST OF DIFFERENT GROUPS OF MEDICATIONS 1.beta blockers Dichloroisoprenaline, the first beta blocker. Non-selective agents • Alprenolol • Bucindolol • Carteolol • Carvedilol (has additional α-blocking activity) • Labetalol (has additional α-blocking activity) • Nadolol • Penbutolol (has intrinsic sympathomimetic activity) • Pindolol (has intrinsic sympathomimetic activity) • Propranolol • Sotalol • Timolol β1-Selective agents • Acebutolol (has intrinsic sympathomimetic activity) • Atenolol • Betaxolol • Bisoprolol • Celiprolol [39] • Esmolol • Metoprolol • Nebivolol 2.Antiarrhythmic classification + • Class I agents interfere with the sodium (Na ) channel. • Class II agents are anti-sympathetic nervous system agents. Most agents in this class are beta blockers. + • Class III agents affect potassium (K ) efflux. • Class IV agents affect calcium channels and the AV node. • Class V agents work by other or unknown mechanisms. • Overview table Clas Known as Examples s • Quinidine • Procainamide Ia fast-channel blockers • Disopyramide • Lidocaine • Phenytoin Ib • Mexiletine Flecainide Ic • • Propafenone • Moricizine • Propranolol • Esmolol • Timolol Metoprolol II Beta-blockers • • Atenolol • Bisoprolol • Amiodarone • Sotalol III IV slow-channel • Verapamil blockers • Diltiazem • Adenosine V • Digoxin 3.Antidepressants Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs • Celexa): usual dosing is 20 mg initially; maintenance 40 mg per day; maximum dose 60 mg per day. • Escitalopram (Lexapro, Cipralex): usual dosing is 10 mg and shown to be as effective as 20 mg in most cases. Maximum dose 20 mg. Also helps with anxiety. • Paroxetine (Paxil, Seroxat): Also used to treat panic disorder, OCD, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and PTSD. Usual dose 25 mg per day; may be increased to 40 mg per day. Available in controlled release 12.5 to 37.5 mg per day; controlled release dose maximum 50 mg per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder View Online At
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder View online at http://pier.acponline.org/physicians/diseases/d086/d086.html Module Updated: 2013-04-15 CME Expiration: 2016-04-15 Authors Christopher Gale, MB, ChB, MPH (Hon), FRANZCP Jane Millichamp, PhD Table of Contents 1. Prevention .........................................................................................................................2 2. Screening ..........................................................................................................................3 3. Diagnosis ..........................................................................................................................5 4. Consultation ......................................................................................................................8 5. Hospitalization ...................................................................................................................9 6. Therapy ............................................................................................................................10 7. Patient Education ...............................................................................................................18 8. Follow-up ..........................................................................................................................19 References ............................................................................................................................20 Glossary................................................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • NCT02523690 IRB00072940 Evaluating Muscle
    NCT02523690 IRB00072940 Evaluating Muscle Weakness Improvement With Lorcaserin in ICU (EMILI) Protocol Version: February 10, 2017 (Date in header of protocol, 8/1/2016 was inadvertently not updated) Date: 1 August 2016 Principal Investigator: Dale Needham, MD PhD Application Number: IRB00072940 JHM IRB - eForm A – Protocol Use the section headings to write the JHM IRB eForm A, inserting the appropriate material in each. If a section is not applicable, leave heading in and insert N/A. When submitting JHM IRB eForm A (new or revised), enter the date submitted to the field at the top of JHM IRB eForm A. *************************************************************************************************** 1) Abstract (Provide no more than a one page research abstract briefly stating the problem, the research hypothesis, and the importance of the research.) It was recently discovery that patients recovering from sepsis/critical illness have great difficulty recruiting motor units to generate muscle force. Prior to this discovery, the primary etiology of muscle weakness in these patients was thought to be muscle disease (myopathy) and degeneration of peripheral nerve (neuropathy). However, since motor units are composed of a group of muscle fibers contacted by a single motor neuron arising from the spinal cord, these new findings suggested a problem within the spinal cord as the primary cause of weakness in affected patients. Consistent with these clinical findings in critically ill patients, there is a profound deficit in the excitability of motor neurons in the spinal cord of septic rats. Studies characterizing the impaired excitability in rat motor neurons point to a specific deficit in a slowly inactivating type of sodium current (i.e., the persistent sodium current).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0118286 A1 Suffin Et Al
    US 2005O118286A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0118286 A1 Suffin et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 2, 2005 (54) COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR Publication Classification TREATMENT OF NERVOUS SYSTEM DSORDERS (51) Int. Cl." ..................... A61K 38/05; A61K 31/5377; A61K 31/522; A61K 31/445; (75) Inventors: Stephen C. Suffin, Sherman Oaks, CA A61K 31/137; A61K 31/138; (US); W. Hamlin Emory, Malibu, CA A61K 31/403; A61K 35/78 (US); Leonard Brandt, San Juan (52) U.S. Cl. ...................... 424/752; 514/18; 514/263.31; Capistrano, CA (US) 514/411; 514/317; 514/649; 514/651; 514/618; 514/235.5 (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: The present invention contemplates compositions and meth MEDLEN & CARROLL, LLP ods to treat patients having a nervous System disorder with Suite 350 a formulation comprising an anticonvulsant and a neuroac 101 Howard Street tive modulator. Also described is a method to predict the San Francisco, CA 94105 (US) probability of a significant recovery when a treating an individual patient having a nervous System disorder with a Assignee: CNS Response formulation comprising an anticonvulsant and a neuroactive (73) modulator. Specifically, methods for predicting patient prog nosis include, but are not limited to, quantitative electroen Appl. No.: 10/972,188 cephalography, psychometric test batteries, biological indi (21) cators, brain metabolic indicators, genotype profiles, neuroimaging, objective test measurements and multi-mo (22) Filed: Oct. 22, 2004 dalities. The present invention also discloses a device pro Viding an organized dispensation of the above formulations Related U.S. Application Data Such that the patient or medical perSonnel may easily and accurately decrease the daily dosage of a third drug and (63) Continuation of application No.
    [Show full text]