DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Wildlife Control: It Starts in Our Own Backyard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urban Wildlife Control: It Starts in Our Own Backyard WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2001 Urban Wildlife Control: It Starts in Our Own Backyard John Hadidian The Humane Society of the United States Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_wmm Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Population Biology Commons Recommended Citation Hadidian, J. (2001). Urban wildlife control: It starts in our own backyard. AV Magazine, 109(4), 20. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AV AV MAGAZINE F ALL 2001 nonlethal approaches that displace the offending raccoon, squirrel, or other animal as not only preferable but, in fact, more practical. It is more often the case than not that we find the ‘nuisance’ animal simply moving on to an alternate den site and continuing to live her own life in a way that causes neither injury nor insult to humans. The heart of the matter concerning urban wildlife is that unnecessary and needless deaths occur all too often because people do not understand that nonlethal solutions exist. This leads to what some have Urban Wildlife Control: called the ‘plight of urban wildlife.’ Misunderstanding, attitudes based on It Starts in Our Own Backyard fear or ignorance, and the absence of anywhere to turn for information all combine to make a deadly situation By John Hadidian, Ph.D., Director, Many are unrecognized victims of for many of our wild neighbors. Urban Wildlife Program, HSUS deliberate acts of cruelty or unthinking However, there is promise within the The first organized effort to deal with policies and practices that lead to unnec- plight. People are stepping forward to animal welfare and protection in the essary deaths. For wild animals in cities deal with the issues surrounding urban United States dates from Henry Bergh’s and towns, it seems we might as well be wildlife, and communities are mobilizing founding of the American Society for back in the times of Henry Bergh and to resolve their problems where they can the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals the start of the ASPCA. best be solved—at ground level. Wildlife (ASPCA) in the mid 1860s. Although In a strange way, urban wildlife suffers rehabilitation, once a back-yard-based motivated by a passionate concern for from what could be called benign operation, is becoming more of a force the fate of draft animals, Bergh’s involve- neglect. The state and federal agencies for awareness and change. Rehabilitators ment in animal protection extended to with authority for wild animals remain and activists are working to educate all horizons, and he was one of the first even today focused on traditional uses urbanites about their wild neighbors and to become involved in issues relating of wildlife (that is, primarily for con- to advocate for tolerance, understanding, to the welfare of wildlife. Concerns sumptive purposes) and for the most and humane approaches to resolving expressed to him and his organization in part ignore urban wildlife, which usually conflicts. Community-based programs the 1870s over the unprincipled slaughter cannot be recreationally or commercially such as GeesePeace™ are addressing of the American bison led to the ASPCA used. A homeowner with a raccoon larger and more complex issues with petitioning Congress for help in stop- problem or a community with concerns urban wildlife by creating positive ping this activity. Unfortunately, while about Canada geese on their soccer solutions and fostering community decried in many quarters in Washington, fields may find little more than advice involvement. the killing was allowed to continue, or a referral elsewhere for help. The largely because it was seen as an expedient To achieve the goal of humane referrals often lead to an individual who way to force Native Americans onto treatment for urban wildlife it will be traps ‘nuisance’ wildlife as a business reservations. Today, such thinking would necessary to work toward protection enterprise. Often called nuisance wildlife be unimaginable. Times have changed, of animals themselves as well as the control operators, or NWCOs, these we’re tempted to say, for the better. preservation of habitats that ensure they individuals may have no background True in some respects, but not in all. can survive. Clearly, urbanization is here with wildlife beyond that gained through to stay. Some fear it can only get worse, During Bergh’s time, most people recreational trapping or hunting experi- with more development and habitat lived in rural areas and practiced a ences. State licensing or testing for destruction, more roads, and more primarily agrarian lifestyle. Today, eight qualifications are more often absent alienation of people from the natural of every ten Americans live in cities or than present, and regulations requiring world. Others see hope as wild animals towns of 50,000 people or more. There humane treatment of captured wildlife become more and more a part of urban are places along both east and west are nonexistent. The traps used to communities. No matter which vision coasts where the very idea of ‘city’ has ‘control’ nuisance wildlife are often meant we have, we all share an obligation to to be expanded to include the gigantic to kill, and in many states thousands and work toward creating a humane and conurbations that extend across literally even tens of thousands of animals die caring world that can sustain both hundreds of miles and involve millions every year for no more offense than people and animals. There is perhaps of people. These same places provide having assumed an uncapped chimney or no more realistic way to work toward homes for millions of wild animals as hole into an attic that led to a safe haven. this goal than to be able to step well. Many are victims of development Where some see killing as the only out the door of our home and say, and displacement as humans expand ‘solution’ to such ‘problems,’ others see “We’ll start here.” AV their living spaces into the countryside. 20.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RIDDLE and MYSTERY a Tapestry of Faith Program for Children 6Th Grade
    RIDDLE AND MYSTERY A Tapestry of Faith Program for Children 6th Grade BY RICHARD S. KIMBALL © Copyright 2010 Unitarian Universalist Association. This program and additional resources are available on the UUA.org web site at www.uua.org/re/tapestry 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE AUTHORS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 THE PROGRAM ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 SESSION 1: THE BIG QUESTIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 SESSION 2: RELIGION TO THE RESCUE .......................................................................................................................................... 35 SESSION 3: LOOKING TOWARD TOMORROW ............................................................................................................................... 54 SESSION 4: THINKING OF GOD ......................................................................................................................................................... 74 SESSION
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Animals II: 2003
    A Strategic Review of International 1CHAPTER Animal Protection Paul G. Irwin Introduction he level of animal protection Prior to the modern period of ani- activity varies substantially Early Activities mal protection (starting after World Taround the world. To some War II), international animal protec- extent, the variation parallels the in International tion involved mostly uncoordinated level of economic development, as support from the larger societies and countries with high per capita Animal certain wealthy individuals and a vari- incomes and democratic political Protection ety of international meetings where structures have better financed and Organized animal protection began in animal protection advocates gathered better developed animal protection England in the early 1800s and together to exchange news and ideas. organizations. However there is not spread from there to the rest of the One of the earliest such meetings a one-to-one correlation between world. Henry Bergh (who founded the occurred in Paris in June 1900 economic development and animal American Society for the Prevention although, by this time, there was protection activity. Japan and Saudi of Cruelty to Animals, or ASPCA, in already a steady exchange of informa- Arabia, for example, have high per 1865) and George Angell (who found- tion among animal protection organi- capita incomes but low or nonexis- ed the Massachusetts Society for the zations around the world. These tent levels of animal protection activ- Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, or exchanges were encouraged further ity, while India has a relatively low per MSPCA, in 1868) both looked to by the organization of a number of capita income but a fairly large num- England and the Royal Society for the international animal protection con- ber of animal protection groups.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Animal Welfare
    1/6/2012 ASPCApro.org presents A History of Animal Welfare Stephen Zawistowski, PhD, CAAB Science Advisor ASPCA Biblical Comments You shall not muzzle the ox while he is threshing. Deuteronomy 5:4 And He said to them, “Which one of you will have a son or an ox fall into a well, and will not immediately pull him out on a Sabbath day?” Luke 14:5 1 1/6/2012 No man shall exercise any Tirrany or Crueltie towards any bruite Creature which are usallie kept for mans use. The Body of Liberties Masschusetts Bay Colonie, 1641 He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals. Immanuel Kant 1724‐1804 2 1/6/2012 Great Chain of Being Scala Naturae • Aristotle (384‐322 BC) • Augustine (345‐430) • Thomas Aquinas (1225‐1274) • Rene Descartes (1596‐1650) William Hogarth Four Stages of Cruelty (1751) 3 1/6/2012 William Hogarth Four Stages of Cruelty (1751) Formal Animal Protection • 1822 –Ill Treatment of Cattle Bill – Richard Martin of Galway • 1824 – formation of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) – Martin, William Wilberforce & Rev. Arthur Broome 4 1/6/2012 Evolutionary Thinking Victorian England was greatly concerned with issues of pain and suffering in medicine and efforts were being made to reduce the pain inflicted on patients. Concerns coincided with advances in anesthesia. Evolutionary Thinking Darwin’s theory of evolution built the bridge tha t lin ke d humans and other animals in their capacity to feel pain, and to suffer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategic Review of International Animal Protection
    A Strategic Review of International 1CHAPTER Animal Protection Paul G. Irwin Introduction he level of animal protection Prior to the modern period of ani- activity varies substantially Early Activities mal protection (starting after World Taround the world. To some War II), international animal protec- extent, the variation parallels the in International tion involved mostly uncoordinated level of economic development, as support from the larger societies and countries with high per capita Animal certain wealthy individuals and a vari- incomes and democratic political Protection ety of international meetings where structures have better financed and Organized animal protection began in animal protection advocates gathered better developed animal protection England in the early 1800s and together to exchange news and ideas. organizations. However there is not spread from there to the rest of the One of the earliest such meetings a one-to-one correlation between world. Henry Bergh (who founded the occurred in Paris in June 1900 economic development and animal American Society for the Prevention although, by this time, there was protection activity. Japan and Saudi of Cruelty to Animals, or ASPCA, in already a steady exchange of informa- Arabia, for example, have high per 1865) and George Angell (who found- tion among animal protection organi- capita incomes but low or nonexis- ed the Massachusetts Society for the zations around the world. These tent levels of animal protection activ- Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, or exchanges were encouraged further ity, while India has a relatively low per MSPCA, in 1868) both looked to by the organization of a number of capita income but a fairly large num- England and the Royal Society for the international animal protection con- ber of animal protection groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-American Blood Sports, 1776-1889: a Study of Changing Morals
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1974 Anglo-American blood sports, 1776-1889: a study of changing morals. Jack William Berryman University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Berryman, Jack William, "Anglo-American blood sports, 1776-1889: a study of changing morals." (1974). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1326. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1326 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANGLO-AMERICAN BLOOD SPORTS, I776-I8891 A STUDY OF CHANGING MORALS A Thesis Presented By Jack William Berryman Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS April, 197^ Department of History » ii ANGLO-AMERICAN BLOOD SPORTS, 1776-1889 A STUDY OF CHANGING MORALS A Thesis By Jack V/illiam Berryman Approved as to style and content by« Professor Robert McNeal (Head of Department) Professor Leonard Richards (Member) ^ Professor Paul Boyer (I'/iember) Professor Mario DePillis (Chairman) April, 197^ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Upon concluding the following thesis, the many im- portant contributions of individuals other than myself loomed large in my mind. Without the assistance of others the project would never have been completed, I am greatly indebted to Professor Guy Lewis of the Department of Physical Education at the University of Massachusetts who first aroused my interest in studying sport history and continued to motivate me to seek the an- swers why.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is One of the First Documented Cases of Child Abuse in the United States
    This is one of the first documented cases of child abuse in the United States. Mary Ellen’s Story Mary Ellen’s case took place in 1874. Her spirit remains with us because her case is generally regarded as the beginning of public concern for the plight of abused and neglected children. Mary Ellen was a child whose father was dead and whose mother could not care for her because she was destitute and had to work full-time. The New York Commission of Charities and Correction placed Mary Ellen with Mary McCormack Connolly and her husband, who were to care for her and report each year on her progress. Instead, Mrs. Connolly abused her. She beat Mary Ellen, locked her in a room, rarely allowed her outside, and did not provide adequate food or clothing. Upset by the child’s screaming, a neighbor told a mission worker about Mary Ellen. The mission worker could find no one to intervene; at the time, laws protecting children were not systematically enforced. The mission worker finally appealed to Henry Bergh, the founder and president of the ASPCA, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. He took up Mary Ellen’s cause and was able to persuade a judge to hear her case. Mary Ellen was carried into the courtroom wrapped in a blanket. This is what the newspaper reported that she told the judge: My father and mother are both dead. I don’t know how old I am … I call Mrs. Connolly mamma. I have never had but one pair of shoes, but I cannot recollect when that was … My bed at night has only been a piece of carpet stretched on the floor underneath a window … Mamma has been in the habit of whipping and beating me almost every day.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Manuscript Collections Anita Baldwin Papers, Huntington
    Bibliography Manuscript Collections Anita Baldwin Papers, Huntington Library, San Marino, CA Rosalie Edge Papers, WesternCollection, Denver Public Library,Denver, CO Minnie MaddernFiske Papers, Libraryof Congress, Washington, DC Simon Flexner Papers, AmericanPhilosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA Ellen Glasgow Papers, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA W. Williams KeenPapers, CoUege of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA Frederic S. LeePapers, Archives and SpecialCollections, A. C. Long Health Sciences Library, Columbia University, New York, NY Jack London Papers, Huntington Library, SanMarino, CA Samuel McCuneLindsay Papers, Columbia University Library, New York, New York Enos Mills Papers, WesternCollection, Denver Public Library, Denver, CO S. Weir Mitchell Papers, College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA Alice ParlePapers, Huntington Library, San Marino, CA Agnes Repplier Collection,University of Pennsylvania Library, Philadelphia, PA TheodoreRoosevelt Collection, Widener Library, Harvard University, Boston, MA F. Peyton Rous Papers, American Philosophical Society Library, Philadelphia, PA Richard Welling Papers, New York Public Library,New York, NY Organizational Archives American Anti-Vivisection Society, Jenkintown, PA AmericanSociety forthe Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New York, NY Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Los Angeles, CA Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Boston, MA Pennsylvania Society forthe Prevention of Crueltyto Animals, Philadelphia, PA PeMsylvania
    [Show full text]
  • Thirteenth Amendment Won't Help Free Willy
    NOTES THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT WON'T HELP FREE WILLY SHERI FLANNERY* I. Introduction... .................................. 30 II. A Brief Historical Overview of Animal Law ............. 36 A. The Debate Over Animal Welfare and Animal Rights.................... 40 1. Philosophy and Animal Rights ................. 40 a. The Early Philosophers of Animal Rights .... 40 b. Modern Advancements in Animal Welfare ... 41 2. The Property Status of Animals ................ 45 3. Drawing the Line ........................... 47 III. Animal Welfare: Beyond the Scope of the Thirteeth Amendment......... ............................ 48 A. An Introduction to the Thirteenth Amendment ...... 48 B. Historical Analysis ............................. 50 1. Historical Setting of the Thirteenth Amendment . 50 2. Plain Meaning: A Drafting History .............. 52 a. The Current Constitutional Language ........ 53 b. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787............ 54 c. The Emancipation Proclamation ............. 56 d. Ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment ... 57 C. Judicial Interpretation of the Thirteenth Amendment ................................. 58 1. Intrepreting the Termology................... 58 2. The Scope of Thirteenth Amendment ............ 59 * Villanova University School of Law, Candidate for Juris Doctor, May 2013; University of Scranton, Bachelor of Arts Communications and Political Science, summa cum laude, 2009. Thank you to the The Scholar Editorial Board for all their hard work and dedication to my Note. A special thanks to my mom, Patricia
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Animal Protection and the Language of Rights in America, 1865-1900
    *DO NOT CITE OR DISTRIBUTE WITHOUT PERMISSION* “The Inalienable Rights of the Beasts”1: Organized Animal Protection and the Language of Rights in America, 1865-1900 Susan J. Pearson Assistant Professor, Department of History Northwestern University Telephone: 847-471-3744 1881 Sheridan Road Email: [email protected] Evanston, IL 60208 ABSTRACT Contemporary animal rights activists and legal scholars routinely charge that state animal protection statutes were enacted, not to serve the interests of animals, but rather to serve the interests of human beings in preventing immoral behavior. In this telling, laws preventing cruelty to animals are neither based on, nor do they establish, anything like rights for animals. Their raison d’etre, rather, is social control of human actions, and their function is to efficiently regulate the use of property in animals. The (critical) contemporary interpretation of the intent and function of animal cruelty laws is based on the accretion of actions – on court cases and current enforcement norms. This approach confuses the application and function of anticruelty laws with their intent and obscures the connections between the historical animal welfare movement and contemporary animal rights activism. By returning to the context in which most state anticruelty statutes were enacted – in the nineteenth century – and by considering the discourse of those activists who promoted the original legislation, my research reveals a more complicated story. Far from being concerned only with controlling the behavior of deviants, the nineteenth-century animal welfare activists who agitated for such laws situated them within a “lay discourse” of rights, borrowed from the successful abolitionist movement, that connected animal sentience, proved through portrayals of their suffering, to animal rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Voices of Edgar Allan Poe
    THE ANIMAL VOICES OF EDGAR ALLAN POE by ©Amyanne Smith A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Department of English/Faculty of Arts Memorial University of Newfoundland October 2014 St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador Smith ii Abstract There are prominent animal figures and graphic moments of animal imagery in several of Edgar Allan Poe’s short stories. These animals are at the heart of the action; they are often main characters. Poe’s animals have voices and these voices challenge the dominant monologue of the narrators and undermine the prevalent ideologies that the stories enact. Poe’s animals shriek, wail, and scream and their voices enable political critiques of some of the central issues at the heart of antebellum America. Without these animals, the marginalized voices could not be heard. The animal denizens in Poe’s stories speak: the cat of “The Black Cat” screams, interrupting and condemning a patriarchal narrator and the orangutan of “The Murders in the Rue Morgue” shrieks, shaves, and murders like a human, challenging the dehumanization of slaves in America. Animal imagery also speaks in the final two stories, but not in the same way; animalizing another being capitalizes on a hierarchy of classifications. By categorizing their oppressors as animals, the patients of “The System of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether” open up a discourse with the narrator in a place where the psychology of madness would silence the voices of the insane and the jester of “Hop-Frog” subverts the monarchical dominance that would oppress the court fool.
    [Show full text]
  • HS NEWS Volume 21, Issue 03
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository Summer 1976 HS NEWS Volume 21, Issue 03 Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/v21_news Recommended Citation "HS NEWS Volume 21, Issue 03" (1976). HSUS News 1976. 1. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/v21_news/1 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Senator Lowell Representative m~[Bl~t8J[[O]~ lffi[Bl~[O]~[~ Weicker Thomas Foley A~IMAL Th.t>,•Jiurna.ne Society News is published quarterly by The Humane ~ocieJY ofthe United. States, with WELFARE h~ad(J.tlc1~¢:a:s at 2100 L Street, N.w., WashiAgton,. D.C. 20037. Telephone: Regardless of the lopsided votes of the research societies. Among the problems (2Q2) 452 ..1100 . ACT Congress on this matter, it seems that for too discussed were: flimsy and inadequate long this legislation was a low priority item. shipping crates, lack of adequate care at Animal safety was too minor to bother with. terminal facilities, and lack of cargo handling The House and Senate vote totals guidelines on the care of animals. AME DED demonstrated, however, that once the Congress Unfortunately, the department responsible was finally ready to take a stand on animal for administering animal regulations, the welfare, it spoke loudly and decisively. Department of Agriculture, thought it best that By Perhaps it is best at this time to develop a we rely on voluntary cooperation among all historical background of the animal welfare groups interested in the animal transportation legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2016 Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement Elan L. Abrell Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1345 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SAVING ANIMALS: EVERYDAY PRACTICES OF CARE AND RESCUE IN THE US ANIMAL SANCTUARY MOVEMENT by ELAN LOUIS ABRELL A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 ELAN LOUIS ABRELL All Rights Reserved ii Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement by Elan Louis Abrell This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________ _________________________________________ Date Jeff Maskovsky Chair of Examining Committee _________________________ _________________________________________ Date Gerald Creed Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Katherine Verdery Melissa Checker THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement by Elan Louis Abrell Advisor: Jeff Maskovsky This multi-sited ethnography of the US animal sanctuary movement is based on 24 months of research at a range of animal rescue facilities, including a companion animal shelter in Texas, exotic animal sanctuaries in Florida and Hawaii, and a farm animal sanctuary in New York.
    [Show full text]