The Launch of the Mozilla Firefox Browser☆

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Launch of the Mozilla Firefox Browser☆ ARTICLE IN PRESS INTMAR-00028; No. of pages: 13; 4C: Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal of Interactive Marketing xx (2009) xxx–xxx www.elsevier.com/locate/intmar CASE: Mozilla vs. Godzilla — The Launch of the Mozilla Firefox Browser☆ Sandeep Krishnamurthy E-Commerce and Marketing, Business Administration Program, University of Washington, Bothell, Box 358533, 18115 Campus Way NE, Room UW1-233, Bothell, WA 98011-8246 Abstract The case describes an interactive marketing campaign used to launch the open source, Mozilla Firefox browser. The case highlights key features of the campaign and the facilitating conditions that enabled product success. The sustainability of the community marketing effort in light of product maturation is the central marketing challenge that the organization now faces. © 2009 Direct Marketing Educational Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Open source; Online community; Interactive marketing Introduction from 2% in July 2004 to 12% in June 2007. Firefox seems to be especially popular in Europe with a market share as high as On November 10, 2004, the second round of the “browser 24.1% in March 2007. wars” (Cusumano and Yoffie 1998, pg. 16) commenced with the An online community (Hagel 1999) of users and developers launch of a new open source; free web browser — Mozilla who gathered at the Spread Firefox site (http://www.spreadfirefox. Firefox (Boutin 2004). Observers who had long assumed that com) facilitated the success of Firefox through an innovative Netscape lost and Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE) won the interactive marketing campaign — see Table 3 for a detailed original browser wars now had a new choice. A Forrester timeline of relevant events. The time had come to evaluate if Research report said that Firefox had style and offered, “some community-led interactive marketing was sufficient to take tangible benefits over Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE)” (Root Firefox to a dominant position in the marketplace. et al. 2005). Mozilla Firefox had an immediate and dramatic impact. As The web browser shown in Table 1, users downloaded Firefox 25 million times in 99 days and 200 million times in 629 days. The European A web browser is the software program that retrieves a web marketshare picture is shown in Table 1. In comparison, at its page from a web server and displays it on the consumer's launch, users downloaded Netscape Navigator nine million times computer. The browser occupies a central position in the online by September 1995, 27 million times by March 1996 and about environment due to its control over user experience, advertising 95 million times by March 1998 (Yoffie and Cusumano 1999). display, applications and security. First, a browser controls the Even keeping in mind the caveat that downloads do not equal online experience of users by providing an information users, this is an indication of a highly successful product launch. architecture through a graphical user interface. The design of A survey released by WebSideStory on Jan 12, 2005 the browser affects how millions of users worldwide interact reported that Microsoft's Internet Explorer's share was down with all online content and applications of all sorts. Due to to 90.6%, the lowest in three years (Hamm 2005). Table 2 differences in the design of the browser, the same page might summarizes the market share of various browsers from 2003 to appear different in various browsers. Optimizing web pages for June 2007 and demonstrates that the usage of Firefox has risen multiple browsers is a major task when designing a web page. Second, browsers can affect how advertising is displayed and — ☆ The title was inspired by Hamm (2005). presented to the user e.g. a browser can automatically disable E-mail address: [email protected]. pop-up ads limiting the ad revenue of publishers and the reach of URL: http://faculty.washington.edu/sandeep. advertisers. Third, the browser is a platform that enables appli- 1094-9968/$ - see front matter © 2009 Direct Marketing Educational Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.008 Please cite this article as: Sandeep Krishnamurthy, CASE: Mozilla vs. Godzilla — The Launch of the Mozilla Firefox Browser, Journal of Interactive Marketing (2009), doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.008 ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 S. Krishnamurthy / Journal of Interactive Marketing xx (2009) xxx–xxx Table 1 Table 3 European browser usage data, March 2007 (Source: Xiti Monitor). Detailed timeline of relevant events. FF2 and IE7 Use rate by European country Firefox 2 IE 7 Event Date Finland 27.0% 23.8% Creation of SpreadFirefox.com Website September 12, 2004 Slovenia 26.8% 8.1% Official Release of Firefox 1.0 November 9, 2004 Germany 25.9% 19.5% New York Times, Full-page ad December 16, 2004 Croatia 23.4% 11.6% 25 millionth download February 16, 2005 Poland 22.1% 8.3% PC Magazine Editor's Choice Award May 2005 Slovakia 21.9% 6.4% Mozilla Corporation Created August 3, 2005 Austria 19.3% 22.7% 100 millionth download October 19, 2005 Czech Republic 18.7% 8.0% CNET Editor's Choice November 2005 Greece 18.6% 14.5% Official Release of Firefox 1.5 November 29, 2005 Estonia 18.4% 17.5% Firefox Flicks Campaign Initiated December 2, 2005 Hungary 16.8% 7.4% 200 millionth download July 31, 2006 Bulgaria 16.8% 9.9% Internet Explorer Version 7.0 Released October 18, 2006 Latvia 16.7% 12.6% Windows Vista Released January 17, 2007 Ireland 15.7% 29.7% Romania 15.1% 9.6% Sweden 13.8% 29.0% designed browser might not be able to detect malignant soft- France 13.6% 33.2% Switzerland 13.1% 31.5% ware applications compromising the data stored on the com- Portugal 11.8% 13.4% puter. Due to these factors, the browser is a software program Lithuania 11.8% 13.6% that occupies a strategic position in the online environment. Luxembourg 11.7% 20.5% Despite this strategic importance, directly earning revenue The UK 11.3% 32.3% from the browser has proved to be a challenge. First, the Belgium 11.3% 29.2% Norway 10.6% 20.4% browser is a way of locking in a user base enabling future Italy 10.3% 23.6% revenue opportunities. As mentioned above, the browser allows Ukraine 10.2% 8.0% possibilities for significant advertising revenue. Second, Spain 9.5% 22.7% browser providers must make considerable investments to Denmark 8.7% 24.5% protect the security of users from viruses and malignant web Andorra 8.2% 28.8% The Netherlands 8.1% 29.5% sites. Firms cannot easily recoup this investment. Online users expect security from browsers and do not necessarily wish to pay for it. It is, perhaps, because of these reasons that there have cations. Application providers work with standards set by the been very few corporate efforts at developing a browser leading browsers when building their programs. For instance, media to limited choice for users. players such as Real Player and Windows Media Player work with the software of the browser in order to be successful. A Mozilla philosophy corporation controlling the browser can use it to leverage its own applications to the exclusion of others. For example, Microsoft The Mozilla Foundation is at the center of a portfolio of uses MSN as the default search engine on its browser enabling products built using the open source philosophy (see Appendix significant advertising revenue. Finally, the web browser is 1 for a discussion of the open source concept). The Mozilla central to the security of the online experience. A poorly Foundation has articulated its philosophy in a manifesto shown Table 2 Browser market share. 2 Browser 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 June May April March Feb. Jan. Dec. Nov. Oct. Sep. Aug. July Dec. July Feb. Dec. July Dec. 1 FireFox 12% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 11% 11% 8% 10% 10% 10% 8% 8% 5% 3% 2% N/A 2 MSIE 3.x b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% 3 MSIE 4.x b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% b1% 1% 4 MSIE 5.x 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 2% 2% 2% 3% 5% 10% 9% 16% 34% 5 MSIE 6.x 54% 56% 56% 58% 58% 63% 70% 76% 83% 81% 82% 82% 83% 83% 81% 80% 77% 59% 6 MSIE 7.x 13% 15% 14% 25% 24% 20% 12% 7% N/A 2% 1% b1% N/A N/A 1% b1% b1% N/A 7 All Netscape b21% b18% b18% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% b8% browsers 8 Opera x.x 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 9 Safari 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% N/A 10 Other b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% b2% 2 Also, see detailed browser release history at- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_browsers#endnote_PlatformIE. (Source: http://www.thecounter. com/stats/). Please cite this article as: Sandeep Krishnamurthy, CASE: Mozilla vs. Godzilla — The Launch of the Mozilla Firefox Browser, Journal of Interactive Marketing (2009), doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.008 ARTICLE IN PRESS S. Krishnamurthy / Journal of Interactive Marketing xx (2009) xxx–xxx 3 in Appendix 2. The manifesto states, “The Mozilla project is a pricing of Internet Explorer; 3) Microsoft's exclusive distribu- global community of people who believe that openness, tion contracts with Internet access providers; and 4) Microsoft's innovation and opportunity are key to the continued health of tying of Internet Explorer to windows” (Klein 2001, pg.
Recommended publications
  • Los Angeles Lawyer October 2006 California Aon Attorneys’ Advantage Insurance Program Building the Foundation for Lawyers’ Protection ONE BLOCK at a TIME
    2006 California State Bar Meeting LACBA 2006-07Directory PULLOUT SECTION October 2006 / $4 EARN MCLE CREDIT Hidden Implications of Arbitration Clauses page 35 MEET andCONFER Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael L. Stern offers insight on the new local trial preparation rules page 26 PLUS Local Regulation of Alcohol Sales page 14 Fugitive Disentitlement page 44 Lawyers Who Use Macs page 53 THIS IS MY POST OFFICE. Download My Desktop Post OfficeTM at usps.com/smartbusiness Introducing the online shortcut that lets you pick and choose the services you use most at usps.com and access them instantly. Request pickups, ship, track packages and more. ©2006 United States Postal Service. Eagle symbol and logotype are registered trademarks of the United States Postal Service. *Over 50% of malpractice suits start with client communication, calendaring and deadline issues. Do you remember what you were doing three weeks ago at this time? Your client does. A MEMBER BENEFIT OF Time Matters® Manage your: Communications • Calendars • Deadlines • E-mail • To Dos • Conflict Checks • Matters • Billing For a demo disk at no cost† or more information call 800.328.2898 or go to lexisnexis.com/TMinfo *Law Practice Today, November 2005 †Some restrictions may apply. Offer ends 12/29/06. LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Time Matters is a registered trademark of LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. AL9202 © 2006 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. October 2006 Vol. 29, No. 7 26 Meet and Confer BY JUDGE MICHAEL L.
    [Show full text]
  • Childnodes 1
    Index Home | Projects | Docs | Jargon Bugzilla | LXR | Tree Status | Checkins Feedback | FAQ | Search A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z Index Symbols _content 1 A addEventListener 1 alert() 1 align 1 alinkColor 1 anchors 1 appCodeName 1 appendChild 1 applets 1 appName 1 appVersion 1 attributes 1, 2 http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref/dom_shortIX.html (1 de 20) [09/06/2003 9:55:09] Index availLeft 1 availTop 1 availWidth 1 B back() 1 bgColor 1 blur 1 blur() 1 body 1 C captureEvents() 1 characterSet 1 childNodes 1 clear 1 clearInterval() 1 clearTimeout() 1 click 1 cloneContents 1 cloneNode 1 cloneRange 1 close 1 http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref/dom_shortIX.html (2 de 20) [09/06/2003 9:55:09] Index close() 1 closed 1 collapse 1 collapsed 1 colorDepth 1 commonAncestorContainer 1 compareBoundaryPoints 1 Components 1 confirm() 1 contentDocument 1, 2 contentWindow 1, 2 controllers 1 cookie 1 cookieEnabled 1 createAttribute 1 createDocumentFragment 1 createElement 1 createRange 1 createTextNode 1 crypto 1 cssRule 1 cssRule Object 1 http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref/dom_shortIX.html (3 de 20) [09/06/2003 9:55:09] Index cssRules 1 cssText 1 D defaultStatus 1 deleteContents 1 deleteRule 1 detach 1 directories 1 disabled 1 dispatchEvent 1 doctype 1 document 1 documentElement 1 DOM 1, 2 DOM 2 Range Interface 1 DOM window Interface 1 domain 1 dump() 1 E Elements Interface 1 embeds 1 http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref/dom_shortIX.html (4 de 20) [09/06/2003 9:55:09]
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History of Winifred Mitchell Baker
    ........ Computer • History Museum Oral History of Winifred Mitchell Baker Interviewed by: Marc Weber Recorded: December 10, 2014 Mountain View, California CHM Reference number: X7311.2015 © 2015 Computer History Museum Oral History of Winifred Mitchell Baker Marc Weber: I'm Marc Weber of the Computer History Museum. And I'm here with Mitchell Baker, Chairwoman of Mozilla. Thank you so much for doing this interview. Winifred Mitchell Baker: Thanks, Marc. I'm happy to be here. The museum has been a bright spot for a long time, so I'm honored as well. Weber: Thank you. As am I. So start with a bit of your background. What is your full name? And when and where were you born? Baker: My full name is Winifred Mitchell Baker. My mom was a little eccentric though, and she never wanted me to use Winifred. So it's my first name. But in her mind, I was always Mitchell. So that's what I go by. And I was born in Berkeley in California in 1959. Weber: And tell me a little bit about your family and where you grew up. Baker: I grew up in Oakland, so the East Bay across from San Francisco. It borders Berkeley. My parents were born and raised on the East Coast and moved west, as people did in the '50s, where it seemed [like] starting a new life. They were each eccentric. And each had their own view of their world and really clear opinions. And I think some of that has rubbed off actually. Weber: So eccentric in what way? What did they do? Baker: Well, my dad was a classic entrepreneur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Underline As Visual Representation of the Hyperlink on the Web: a Case Study in Skeuomorphism
    The Origins of the Underline as Visual Representation of the Hyperlink on the Web: A Case Study in Skeuomorphism The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Romano, John J. 2016. The Origins of the Underline as Visual Representation of the Hyperlink on the Web: A Case Study in Skeuomorphism. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33797379 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Origins of the Underline as Visual Representation of the Hyperlink on the Web: A Case Study in Skeuomorphism John J Romano A Thesis in the Field of Visual Arts for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University November 2016 Abstract This thesis investigates the process by which the underline came to be used as the default signifier of hyperlinks on the World Wide Web. Created in 1990 by Tim Berners- Lee, the web quickly became the most used hypertext system in the world, and most browsers default to indicating hyperlinks with an underline. To answer the question of why the underline was chosen over competing demarcation techniques, the thesis applies the methods of history of technology and sociology of technology. Before the invention of the web, the underline–also known as the vinculum–was used in many contexts in writing systems; collecting entities together to form a whole and ascribing additional meaning to the content.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Heidemarie Hanekop, Volker Wittke the Role of Users in Internet-Based
    Heidemarie Hanekop, Volker Wittke The Role of Users in Internet-based Innovation Processes The discussion of innovations on the Internet is increasingly focusing on the active role of customers and users. Especially in the development and improvement of digital products and services (such as software, information services or online trade), adapted to consumer demands, we observe an expansion of autonomous activities of customers and users. The division of labour between suppliers and users, producers and consumers is no longer definite. This also brings into question long standing and firmly established boundaries between employment which is still structured by the capitalist law of profit and a private world following other principles. The digital mode of production and distribution, together with the necessary means of production (personal computer) in the hands of numerous private users, provide these users with expanding possibilities to develop and produce digital products and services. In addition, the Internet as a platform of communication facilitates world-wide production with participation of a great number of users ("mass collaboration" – see Tapscott 2006). The development of Open Source Software (OSS) and the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia represent a particularly far-reaching participation of users. It is true that we are dealing with the production of public goods here and therefore specific basic conditions for "mass collaboration". However, concepts like "interactive value creation" (Reichwald/Piller 2006) or "open innovation" (Chesbrough 2003, Chesbrough et al. 2006) propagate an opening of innovation processes for users unrelated to companies also in the framework of commercial value creation, as a central new dimension of promising organisation of innovation processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Google Play App for Firefox Download the Google Play App for Firefox
    download the google play app for firefox Download the google play app for firefox. Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property. What can I do to prevent this in the future? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. Cloudflare Ray ID: 679fdb395c10c3f7 • Your IP : 188.246.226.140 • Performance & security by Cloudflare. Firefox Browser. No shady privacy policies or back doors for advertisers. Just a lightning fast browser that doesn’t sell you out. Latest Firefox features. Picture-in-Picture. Pop a video out of the browser window so you can stream and multitask. Expanded Dark Mode. Take it easy on your eyes every time you go online. An extra layer of protection. DNS over HTTPS (DoH) helps keep internet service providers from selling your data. Do what you do online. Firefox Browser isn’t watching. How Firefox compares to other browsers. Get all the speed and tools with none of the invasions of privacy. Firefox Browser collects so little data about you, we don’t even require your email address to download.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21St Century
    An occasional paper on digital media and learning Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century Henry Jenkins, Director of the Comparative Media Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with Katie Clinton Ravi Purushotma Alice J. Robison Margaret Weigel Building the new field of digital media and learning The MacArthur Foundation launched its five-year, $50 million digital media and learning initiative in 2006 to help determine how digital technologies are changing the way young people learn, play, socialize, and participate in civic life.Answers are critical to developing educational and other social institutions that can meet the needs of this and future generations. The initiative is both marshaling what it is already known about the field and seeding innovation for continued growth. For more information, visit www.digitallearning.macfound.org.To engage in conversations about these projects and the field of digital learning, visit the Spotlight blog at spotlight.macfound.org. About the MacArthur Foundation The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation is a private, independent grantmaking institution dedicated to helping groups and individuals foster lasting improvement in the human condition.With assets of $5.5 billion, the Foundation makes grants totaling approximately $200 million annually. For more information or to sign up for MacArthur’s monthly electronic newsletter, visit www.macfound.org. The MacArthur Foundation 140 South Dearborn Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Tel.(312) 726-8000 www.digitallearning.macfound.org An occasional paper on digital media and learning Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century Henry Jenkins, Director of the Comparative Media Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with Katie Clinton Ravi Purushotma Alice J.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast, Inexpensive Content-Addressed Storage in Foundation Sean Rhea,∗ Russ Cox, Alex Pesterev∗ Meraki, Inc
    Fast, Inexpensive Content-Addressed Storage in Foundation Sean Rhea,∗ Russ Cox, Alex Pesterev∗ Meraki, Inc. MIT CSAIL Abstract particular operating system, itself depending on a particu- lar hardware configuration. In the worst case, a user in the Foundation is a preservation system for users’ personal, distant future might need to replicate an entire hardware- digital artifacts. Foundation preserves all of a user’s data software stack to view an old file as it once existed. and its dependencies—fonts, programs, plugins, kernel, Foundation is a system that preserves users’ personal and configuration state—by archiving nightly snapshots digital artifacts regardless of the applications with which of the user’s entire hard disk. Users can browse through they create those artifacts and without requiring any these images to view old data or recover accidentally preservation-specific effort on the users’ part. To do so, deleted files. To access data that a user’s current environ- it permanently archives nightly snapshots of a user’s en- ment can no longer interpret, Foundation boots the disk tire hard disk. These snapshots contain the complete soft- image in which that data resides under an emulator, al- ware stack needed to view a file in bootable form: given lowing the user to view and modify the data with the same an emulator for the hardware on which that stack once programs with which the user originally accessed it. ran, a future user can view a file exactly as it was. To limit This paper describes Foundation’s archival storage the hardware that future emulators must support, Foun- layer, which uses content-addressed storage (CAS) to re- dation confines users’ environments to a virtual machine.
    [Show full text]
  • Browser Wars
    Uppsala universitet Inst. för informationsvetenskap Browser Wars Kampen om webbläsarmarknaden Andreas Högström, Emil Pettersson Kurs: Examensarbete Nivå: C Termin: VT-10 Datum: 2010-06-07 Handledare: Anneli Edman "Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of read- ing a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network" - Sir Timothy John Berners-Lee, grundare av World Wide Web Consortium, Technology Review juli 1996 Innehållsförteckning Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Sammanfattning ......................................................................................................................... 2 1 Inledning .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Bakgrund .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Syfte ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Frågeställningar .................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Avgränsningar .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • M&A @ Facebook: Strategy, Themes and Drivers
    A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from NOVA – School of Business and Economics M&A @ FACEBOOK: STRATEGY, THEMES AND DRIVERS TOMÁS BRANCO GONÇALVES STUDENT NUMBER 3200 A Project carried out on the Masters in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Pedro Carvalho January 2018 Abstract Most deals are motivated by the recognition of a strategic threat or opportunity in the firm’s competitive arena. These deals seek to improve the firm’s competitive position or even obtain resources and new capabilities that are vital to future prosperity, and improve the firm’s agility. The purpose of this work project is to make an analysis on Facebook’s acquisitions’ strategy going through the key acquisitions in the company’s history. More than understanding the economics of its most relevant acquisitions, the main research is aimed at understanding the strategic view and key drivers behind them, and trying to set a pattern through hypotheses testing, always bearing in mind the following question: Why does Facebook acquire emerging companies instead of replicating their key success factors? Keywords Facebook; Acquisitions; Strategy; M&A Drivers “The biggest risk is not taking any risk... In a world that is changing really quickly, the only strategy that is guaranteed to fail is not taking risks.” Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook 2 Literature Review M&A activity has had peaks throughout the course of history and different key industry-related drivers triggered that same activity (Sudarsanam, 2003). Historically, the appearance of the first mergers and acquisitions coincides with the existence of the first companies and, since then, in the US market, there have been five major waves of M&A activity (as summarized by T.J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcia Knous: My Name Is Marcia Knous
    Olivia Ryan: Can you just state your name? Marcia Knous: My name is Marcia Knous. OR: Just give us your general background. How did you come to work at Mozilla and what do you do for Mozilla now? MK: Basically, I started with Mozilla back in the Netscape days. I started working with Mozilla.org shortly after AOL acquired Netscape which I believe was in like the ’99- 2000 timeframe. I started working at Netscape and then in one capacity in HR shortly after I moved working with Mitchell as part of my shared responsibility, I worked for Mozilla.org and sustaining engineering to sustain the communicator legacy code so I supported them administratively. That’s basically what I did for Mozilla. I did a lot of I guess what you kind of call of blue activities where we have a process whereby people get access to our CVS repository so I was the gatekeeper for all the CVS forms and handle all the bugs that were related to CVS requests, that kind of thing. Right now at Mozilla, I do quality assurance and I run both our domestic online store as well as our international store where we sell all of our Mozilla gear. Tom Scheinfeldt: Are you working generally alone in small groups? In large groups? How do you relate to other people working on the project? MK: Well, it’s a rather interesting project. My capacity as a QA person, we basically relate with the community quite a bit because we have a very small internal QA organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozilla Foundation and Subsidiary, December 31, 2018 and 2017
    MOZILLA FOUNDATION AND SUBSIDIARY DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Mozilla Foundation and Subsidiary Independent Auditors’ Report and Consolidated Financial Statements Independent Auditors’ Report 1 - 2 Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 3 Consolidated Statement of Activities and Change in Net Assets 4 Consolidated Statement of Functional Expenses 5 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7 - 27 Independent Auditors’ Report THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MOZILLA FOUNDATION AND SUBSIDIARY Mountain View, California Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of MOZILLA FOUNDATION AND SUBSIDIARY (Mozilla) which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of activities and change in net assets, and cash flows for the years then ended, the statement of functional expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors’ Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]