Toward a Phenomenology of Unwanted Pregnancy
Being Torn: Toward a Phenomenology of Unwanted Pregnancy CAROLINE LUNDQUIST In Pregnant Embodiment: Subjectivity and Alienation, Iris Marion Young describes the lived bodily experience of women who have “chosen” their pregnancies. In this essay, Lundquist underscores the need for a more inclusive phenomenology of preg- nancy. Drawing on sources in literature, psychology, and phenomenology, she offers descriptions of the cryptic phenomena of rejected and denied pregnancy, indicating the vast range of pregnancy experience and illustrating substantial phenomenological differences between “chosen” and unwanted pregnancies. It is crucial . that women take seriously the enterprise of finding out what we do feel, instead of accepting what we have been told we must feel. —Adrienne Rich In Pregnant Embodiment: Subjectivity and Alienation, Iris Marion Young draws from sources in literature, psychology, and phenomenology to provide an account of the lived bodily experience of pregnancy.1 Young limits her analysis to women in “technologically sophisticated Western societies,” who have chosen pregnancy, where by “chosen,” she intends “either an explicit decision to become pregnant or at least a choosing to be identified with and positively accepting of it [preg- nancy],” while acknowledging that throughout human history, most women have not chosen their pregnancies in this sense (2005, 47). Young’s revolution- ary work paves the way for a more comprehensive phenomenology of pregnancy, one that gives voice to the multitudes of women who have not chosen their pregnancies, even in the limited sense she describes. In this piece, I underscore Hypatia vol. 23, no. 3 (July–September 2008) © by Caroline Lundquist Caroline Lundquist 137 the need for a phenomenology of pregnancy that is inclusive of the experiences of those other women—the women whose voices we find conspicuously absent from contemporary discourse on pregnancy and abortion.
[Show full text]