DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloading, Mapping, Formatting, and Using the Data for This Particular Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloading, Mapping, Formatting, and Using the Data for This Particular Analysis Evaluation of the Chemical Misuse Treatment and Recovery Services (CMTRS) Program Institute for Circumpolar Health Studies University of Alaska Anchorage 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508 January 2000 The CMTRS Evaluation is supported by a contract with the State of Alaska, Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse. CMTRS is supported through CSAT RRCD Grant #5U94 TI00883 PROJECT TEAM YKHC Directors Gene Peltola, CEO/President Mary Anarak, VP, Community Services CMTRS Staff Joan Hamilton, Director, CMTRS Alice Abraham, Director, CMTRS State of Alaska Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Kay Klose, State Project Coordinator Pete Kinney, Research Analyst Institute for Circumpolar Health Studies Evaluation Team Brian Saylor, PhD, MPH Brad Kehoe, MA Stacy Lynn Smith, MFA Gary Hughes, EdD Kate Heitkamp, BS Beth Landon, MBA, MHA Patricia E. Starratt, BA Mary Ellen Gordian, MD, MPH Consultants David Marshall, MA Beth Kersey, MS, MRA, Former RSAS Program Director Larry Emerson, PhD Candidate Consultant Services Robert Pond, MA Pacific Production Services Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................i I. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 A. Background.................................................................................................................1 B. Setting ........................................................................................................................ 1 C. Description of Villages ................................................................................................ 2 1. CMTRS Villages ................................................................................................... 2 2. VAEC Comparison Villages .................................................................................. 3 3. Village Hub City .................................................................................................... 5 D. Program Description ................................................................................................... 5 1. Initial Program Vision ............................................................................................ 5 a. Local Policy Steering Committees................................................................... 6 b. Local Providers................................................................................................ 7 c. Traditional Treatment Modalities...................................................................... 7 2. Program Values.................................................................................................... 8 E. Evolution of Cmtrs....................................................................................................... 8 F. Services...................................................................................................................... 9 1. Western Substance Abuse Treatment................................................................... 9 2. Traditional Treatment Modalities......................................................................... 10 3. Local Hiring......................................................................................................... 11 G. Training .................................................................................................................... 11 H. Governance.............................................................................................................. 12 1. YKHC Board of Directors .................................................................................... 12 2. CMTRS Policy Steering Committees................................................................... 12 3. Mental Health and Substance Abuse Advisory Board ......................................... 12 I. Administration ............................................................................................................ 13 1. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment RRCD Program .................................... 13 2. Regional Substance Abuse Treatment System................................................... 13 3. State of Alaska Division of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse...................................... 13 4. Summary ............................................................................................................ 14 II. Evaluation Design............................................................................................................ 15 A. Evaluation Questions................................................................................................ 15 B. Comparison Groups.................................................................................................. 16 C. Selection of Quantitative and Qualitative Techniques ............................................... 18 1. Initial Effort of Using Quantitative Data................................................................ 18 2. Decision to Incorporate Qualitative Evaluation.................................................... 19 a. Conditions Influencing the Decision to Use Qualitative Methods ................... 19 b. Evaluation Plan Revisions............................................................................. 19 c. Summary....................................................................................................... 20 3. Flow chart on choice of Evaluation Method......................................................... 22 III. Qualitative Findings ........................................................................................................ 23 A. Focus Groups ............................................................................................................ 23 1. CMTRS Focus Groups........................................................................................ 24 a. Introduction ................................................................................................... 24 b. Thematic Analysis ......................................................................................... 24 c. Conclusion..................................................................................................... 28 i 2. VAEC Focus Groups........................................................................................... 29 a. Introduction ................................................................................................... 29 b. Thematic Analysis ......................................................................................... 29 c. Conclusion..................................................................................................... 38 3. Comparison of CMTRS and VAEC Focus Groups .............................................. 38 a. Introduction ................................................................................................... 38 b. Thematic Analysis ......................................................................................... 39 c. Conclusion..................................................................................................... 42 B. Video Taped Key Informant Interviews...................................................................... 42 1. Introduction......................................................................................................... 42 2. The Key Informant Interview Evaluation Process ................................................ 42 3. Planning, Instrument Design, and Execution....................................................... 43 4. Conclusion.......................................................................................................... 44 IV. Use of Yup'ik/Cup'ik Traditional Modalities ..................................................................... 46 A. Introduction............................................................................................................... 46 B. Implementation of Traditional Modalities ................................................................... 47 1. Mission Statement .............................................................................................. 47 2. Basic Assumptions.............................................................................................. 47 3. Traditional Modalities for Wellness Goals and Outcomes.................................... 48 C. Yup’ik/Cup'ik Standards of Care ............................................................................... 48 1. Definition of Standards........................................................................................ 48 2. Yup'ik Standards and Alcohol Programs ............................................................. 49 3. The Need for Yup’ik Standards of Care............................................................... 50 4. How Standards are Developed ........................................................................... 50 5. Yup'ik Standards and Treatment Planning and Clinical Supervision.................... 50 6. Ethical Considerations in Standards.................................................................... 51 D. Issues in Treating Native Peoples............................................................................. 51 1. Choice ................................................................................................................ 52 2. Confidentiality ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Memories of the Origins of Ethnographic Film / Beate Engelbrecht (Ed.)
    Contents Preface Beate Engelbrecht IX Introduction 1 The Early Years of Visual Anthropology Paul Hockings 3 The Prehistory of Ethnographic Film Luc de Heusch 15 Precursors in the Documentary Film 23 Robert Flaherty as I Knew Him. R ichard L eacock 2 5 Richard Leacock and the Origins of Direct Cinema: Re-assessing the Idea of an 'Uncontrolled Cinema' Chris tof Decker 31 Grierson Versus Ethnographic Film Brian Winston 49 Research and Record-Making Approaches 57 Recording Social Interaction: Margaret Mead and Gregory Batcson's Contribution to Visual Anthropology in Ethnographic Context Gerald Sullivan 59 From Bushmen to Ju/'Hoansi: A Personal Reflection on the Early Films of John Marshall. Patsy Asch 71 Life By Myth: The Development of Ethnographic Filming in the Work of John Marshall John Bishop 87 Pulling Focus: Timothy Asch Between Filmmaking and Pedagogy Sarah Elder 95 VI Contents Observational and Participatory Approaches 121 Colin Young, Ethnographic Film and the Film Culture of the 1960s David MacDougall 1 23 Colin Young and Running Around With a Camera Judith MacDougall 133 The Origins of Observational Cinema: Conversations with Colin Young Paul Henley 139 Looking for an Indigenous View 163 The Worth/Adair Navajo Experiment - Unanticipated Results and Reactions Richard Chalfen 165 The Legacy of John Collier, Jr. Peter Biella 111 George Stoney: The Johnny Appelseed of Documentary Dorothy Todd Henaut 189 The American Way 205 "Let Me Tell You A Story": Edmund Carpenter as Forerunner in the Anthropology of Visual Media Harald Prins and John Bishop 207 Asen Balikci Films Nanook Paul Hockings 247 Robert Gardner: The Early Years Karl G.
    [Show full text]
  • Antropología
    Artes y Humanidades Guías para una docencia universitaria con perspectiva de género Antropología Jordi Roca Girona ESTA COLECCIÓN DE GUÍAS HA SIDO IMPULSADA POR EL GRUPO DE TRABAJO DE IGUALDAD DE GÉNERO DE LA RED VIVES DE UNIVERSIDADES Elena Villatoro Boan, presidenta de la Comisión de Igualdad y Conciliación de Vida Laboral y Familiar, Universitat Abat Oliba CEU. M. José Rodríguez Jaume, vicerrectora de Responsabilidad Social, Inclusión e Igualdad, Universitat d’Alacant. Cristina Yáñez de Aldecoa, coordinadora del Rectorado en Internacionalización y Relaciones Institucionales, Universitat d’Andorra. Maria Prats Ferret, directora del Observatorio para la Igualdad, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. M. Pilar Rivas Vallejo, directora de la Unidad de Igualdad, Universitat de Barcelona. Ruth María Abril Stoffels, directora de la Unidad de Igualdad, Universitat CEU Cardenal Herrera. Anna Maria Pla Boix, delegada del rector para la Igualdad de Género, Universitat de Girona. Esperanza Bosch Fiol, directora de la Oficina para la Igualdad de Oportunidades entre Mujeres y Hombres, Universitat de las Illes Balears. Consuelo León Llorente, directora del Observatorio de Políticas Familiares, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya. Mercedes Alcañiz Moscardó, directora de la Unidad de Igualdad, Universitat Jaume I. Anna Romero Burillo, directora del Centro Dolors Piera de Igualdad de Oportunidades y Promoción de las Mujeres, Universitat de Lleida. María José Alarcón García, directora de la Unidad de Igualdad, Universitat Miguel Hernández d’Elx. Maria Olivella Quintana, coordinadora de la Unidad de Igualdad, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Dominique Sistach, responsable de la Comisión de Igualdad de Oportunidades, Universitat de Perpinyà Via Domitia. Silvia Gómez Castán, técnica de Igualdad del Gabinete de Innovación y Comunidad, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae --- Richard M
    CURRICULUM VITAE --- RICHARD M. CHALFEN Center on Media and Child Health The Mariner, Unit 204 Children’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School 300 Commercial Street 300 Longwood Avenue Boston, MA 02109 Boston, MA 02115 USA (617) 227-1534 (617) 355-5420 www.richardchalfen.com [email protected] EDUCATION: 1974 Ph.D. in Communications, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 1967 M.A. in Communications, Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 1964 B.A. in Anthropology, The College, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA HONORS: 2005 Distinguished Alumnus Award, Buckingham Browne and Nichols School, Cambridge, MA. POSITIONS: 2007 (fall) Visiting Fellow -- ESRC-SSRC Collaborative Visiting Fellowship on Real Life Methods at the ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Leeds and Manchester Universities, UK 2004- Emeritus Professor of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2003- Senior Scientist, Center on Media and Child Health, Children’s Hospital Boston/Harvard Medical School, Boston MA. 2001-02 Associate Scientific Staff, Department of Adolescent Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 2001, 05-06 William Valentine Cole Chair, Visiting Professor of Sociology/ Anthropology, Wheaton College, Norton, Massachusetts 1997-99 Adjunct Professor, Union Institute Graduate College, Cincinnati, Ohio 1993-95, 99 Professor of Anthropology, Temple University Japan, Minami-Osawa,
    [Show full text]
  • Etnografija I Etnografski Film
    Etnografija i etnografski film Mirković, Maja Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2017 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Pula / Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:137:535260 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-29 Repository / Repozitorij: Digital Repository Juraj Dobrila University of Pula Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli Odjel za interdisciplinarne, talijanske i kulturološke studije MAJA MIRKOVIĆ ETNOGRAFIJA I ETNOGRAFSKI FILM Diplomski rad Pula, 2017. Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli Odjel za interdisciplinarne, talijanske i kulturološke studije MAJA MIRKOVIĆ ETNOGRAFIJA I ETNOGRAFSKI FILM Diplomski rad JMBAG: 39- KT-D, redovita studentica Studijski smjer: Kultura i turizam Predmet: Etnografija industrije Znanstveno područje: Humanističke znanosti Znanstveno polje: Etnologija i antropologija Znanstvena grana: Etnologija Mentor: doc. dr. Andrea Matošević Pula, ožujak 2017. IZJAVA O AKADEMSKOJ ČESTITOSTI Ja, dolje potpisani Maja Mirković, kandidat za magistra Kulture i turizma ovime izjavljujem da je ovaj Diplomski rad rezultat isključivo mojega vlastitog rada, da se temelji na mojim istraživanjima te da se oslanja na objavljenu literaturu kao što to pokazuju korištene bilješke i bibliografija. Izjavljujem da niti jedan dio Diplomskog rada nije napisan na nedozvoljen način, odnosno da je prepisan iz kojega necitiranog rada, te da ikoji dio rada krši bilo čija autorska prava. Izjavljujem, također,
    [Show full text]
  • An Anthropology of Science, Magic and Expertise Semester 1, Alan Turing Building, G.107 Credits 20 (UG) 15 (PG)
    FACULTY OF HUMANITIES SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY COURSE UNIT OUTLINE 2018/19 SOAN 30051/60051: An Anthropology of Science, Magic and Expertise Semester 1, Alan Turing Building, G.107 Credits 20 (UG) 15 (PG) Course Convener: Professor Penelope Harvey Lecturers: Penny Harvey and Vlad Schuler Room: (Penny Harvey) 2.058 Arthur Lewis Building. Telephone: 275-8985 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Office Hours: (Penny Harvey) Mondays 3-4pm (Vlad Schuler) TBC Administrators: UG Kellie Jordan, UG Office G.001 Arthur Lewis Building (0161) 275 4000 [email protected] PG Vickie Roche, 2.003, Arthur Lewis building (0161) 275 3999 [email protected] Lectures: Monday 9.00 - 11.00 am Alan Turing Building, G.107 Tutorials: Allocate yourself to a tutorial group using the Student System Assessment: Short reports (500 words) x 3 = 10% 1000 word Book review = 20% 3000 word Assessed essay = 70% PGT (MA students) 4000 word Assessed essay = 100% Due Dates: Short report 1 - Friday 19th October 2pm Short report 2 - Friday 16th November 2pm Short report 3 - Friday 7th December 2pm 1 Book review - Friday 9th November 2pm Final essay date – Monday 14th January 2pm PGT (MA students) – Monday 14th January 2pm Please read the following information sheet in the Assessment Section on Blackboard, in connection with Essays and Examinations: INSTRUCTIONS FOR SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY UNDERGRADUATE ESSAYS AND COURSEWORK Reading week: 29th October – 2nd November 2018 Communication: Students must read their University e-mails regularly, as important information will be communicated in this way. Please read this course outline through very carefully as it provides essential information needed by all students attending this course.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Aboriginal Oral Traditions
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Missouri: MOspace Oral Tradition 1/2 (1986): 231-71 Australian Aboriginal Oral Traditions Margaret Clunies Ross 1. Aboriginal Oral Traditions A History of Research and Scholarship1 The makers of Australian songs, or of the combined songs and dances, are the poets, or bards, of the tribes, and are held in great esteem. Their names are known in the neighboring tribes, and their songs are carried from tribe to tribe, until the very meaning of the words is lost, as well as the original source of the song. It is hard to say how far and how long such a song may travel in the course of time over the Australian continent. (Howitt 1904:414) In 1988 non-Aboriginal Australians will celebrate two hundred years’ occupation of a country which had previously been home to an Aboriginal population of about 300,000 people. They probably spoke more than two hundred different languages and most individuals were multilingual (Dixon 1980). They had a rich culture, whose traditions were centrally concerned with the celebration of three basic types of religious ritual-rites of fertility, initiation, and death (Maddock 1982:105-57). In many parts of Australia, particularly in the south where white settlement was earliest and densest, Aboriginal traditional life has largely disappeared, although the memory of it has been passed down the generations. Nowadays all Aborigines, even in the most traditional parts of the north, such as Arnhem Land, are affected to a greater or lesser extent by the Australian version of Western culture, and must preserve their own traditions by a combination of holding strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pour Une Anthropologie Visuelle
    DE L'HOMME H. ZEMP Musique dan. La musique dan la pensée et la vie sociale dune société africaine. 1971.320 pages. J.-P. LEBEUF ET P.-F. LACROIX Devinettes peules suivies de quelques proverbes et exemples dargots ( Nord - Cameroun). 1972.72 pages. Recueil darticles publiés sous la direction de P.-J. SIMON ET L SIMON-BAROUH HSO Sông. Un culte viêtnamien de possession CLAUDINE DE FRANCE transplanté en France. 1973.86 pages. P. RIESMAN Société et liberté chez les Peul Djelg$bé de Haute- Volta: Essai danthropologie introspective. 1974.262 pages. B. KOECHLIN Les Vezo de Sud-Ouest de Madagascar: Contribution à létude de léco-système de semi-nomades marins. 1975. 244 pages. J.-P. LEBEUF Études Kotoko. 1976.106 pages. J.-C. MULLER Parenté et mariage chez les Rukuba État Benue-Plateau, Nigeria. 1976.206 pages. M.-L. REINICHE Les Dieux et les hommes: Étude des cultes dun village du Tirunelveli. 1979.304 pages. ÉCOLE DES HAUTES ÉTUDES EN SCIENCES SOCIALES PARIS MOUTON ÉDITEUR • PARIS • LA HAYE • NEW YORK Ethnologie - Géographie Linguistique Recueil darticles publiés sous la direction de CLAUDINE DE FRANCE MOUTON ÉDITEUR • PARIS • LA HAYE • NEW YORK INTRODUCTION Ce volume, consacré au film ethnographique, est une sélection de textes ayant servi de documents de travail à la session préalable du IXe Congrès international des sciences anthropologiques et ethnologiques tenu à Chicago en 1973, session au cours de laquelle furent débattus les problèmes posés par l'anthropologie visuelle. Bien que les trente communications présentées soient toutes d'un très grand intérêt, nous n'avons retenu qu'une petite partie d'entre elles, car il nous a paru essentiel de faire accéder directement et dans des délais raisonnables, le public francophone à des textes traitant d'une discipline qui, jusqu'ici, étaient uniquement le fait de spécialistes.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Thoughts on Culture/Media
    Some Thoughts on Culture/Media Faye Ginsburg When I was asked to develop a program in documentation. Until very recently, with the exception ethnographic film in 1986,1 was determined to develop of some interest in the development of media use by a curriculum or, more ambitiously, expand the paradigm indigenous peoples since the 1980s (Ginsburg 1991, in a way that would not reproduce the reified dualisms 1993; Michaels 1986,1991a, 1991b; Ruby 1991; Turner of gemienschafiJgesellschaft that have had a striking 1991, 1992a, 1992b), there has been little systematic and depressing resilience in the field of ethnographic ethnographic engagement with what is rapidly becoming film, visual anthropology, and communications research. the most widespread means of cultural production and Despite the early and important work of people such as mediation on the globe. As Debra Spitulnick notes in Jean Rouch that broke down these barriers, notions of her recent review of "Anthropology and the Mass "us" as high-tech and post-industrial and "them" as pre- Media," tech and underdeveloped still persist. Myriad versions could be summarized and parodied along the following ...an inquiry into just why and how anthropologists lines: have managed to neglect the centrality of mass media in twentieth century life would not only be of we have cameras/ they have exotic rituals historical interest, but also of potential use in we have mass media/ they have "authentic" art illuminating certain conceptual gaps in we have alienation/ they have face to face contemporary anthropological theory (1993: 1) communities we have post-modernism/ they have ecologically- In the field of communications, much contemporary integrated world views theory still views mass media as inexorably hegemonic and homogenizing in the interest of dominant social For anthropologists, mass media have mostly been groups, wiping out the cultural integrity, authenticity, viewed as disruptive if not corrupting of the small-scale and diversity of the people at the receiving end.
    [Show full text]
  • Editor's Introduction
    Studies in Visual Communication Volume 1 Issue 1 Fall 1974 Article 2 1974 Editor's Introduction Sol Worth Recommended Citation Worth, S. (1974). Editor's Introduction. 1 (1), 1-2. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol1/ iss1/2 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol1/iss1/2 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Editor's Introduction This contents is available in Studies in Visual Communication: https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol1/iss1/2 teachers. It also seemed to be the case that the term "Program in Ethnographic Film" seemed to emphasize r • ~ filmmaking, while both that term and "Visual Anthropol­ ogy" seemed to exclude people in Sociology, Psychology, Art History, Communication, and other related fields, who were also interested in how man thought of, understood, EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION made, communicated by, and used materials and events that were in the visual mode. Volume One, Number One of a new publication is always The very awkwardness of this new term, The Anthropol­ . an ambiguous event. On the one hand there is no question ogy of Visual Communication, which we have chosen as the that adding to the unending stream of publications is in itself title of our Society and of our publication, might have one always suspect; on the other hand grown men and women important and salutary effect. It can never be made to roll devote unusual amounts of energy for no economic, and very glibly off the tongue as a description of what one does, or of little social compensation, in order to start, sustain, and whom one is affiliated with.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Heider - Ethnographic Film
    ethnographic film TT3867.indb3867.indb i 88/21/06/21/06 112:47:202:47:20 PPMM THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ethnographic film Revised Edition by karl g. heider university of texas press Austin TT3867.indb3867.indb iiiiii 88/21/06/21/06 112:47:202:47:20 PPMM Copyright © 1976, 2006 by the University of Texas Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Revised edition, 2006 Requests for permission to reproduce material from this work should be sent to: Permissions University of Texas Press P.O. Box 7819 Austin, TX 78713– 7819 www.utexas.edu/utpress/about/bpermission.html ᭺ϱ The paper used in this book meets the minimum requirements of ansi/niso z39.48 – 1992 (r1997) (Permanence of Paper). library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Heider, Karl G., 1935– Ethnographic fi lm / by Karl G. Heider. — Rev. ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13: 978-0-292-71458-8 ((pbk.) : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-292-71458-o 1. Motion pictures in ethnology. 2. Motion pictures in ethnology–Study and teaching. I. Title. gn347.h44 2006 305.8 –dc22 2006019479 TT3867.indb3867.indb iivv 88/21/06/21/06 112:47:212:47:21 PPMM To Robert Gardner And to the memory of Jean Rouch John Marshall Timothy Asch TT3867.indb3867.indb v 88/21/06/21/06 112:47:222:47:22 PPMM THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK contents preface ix acknowledgments xv 1. introduction 1 Toward a Definition: The Nature of the Category “Ethnographic Film” 1 The Nature of Ethnography 4 The Differing Natures of Ethnography and Film 8 “Truth” in Film and Ethnography 10 2.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Pines: a Visual Ethnography of American, Mexican and Canadian Reforestation Workers
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 In The Pines: A Visual Ethnography Of American, Mexican And Canadian Reforestation Workers Noam Osband University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Labor Economics Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Osband, Noam, "In The Pines: A Visual Ethnography Of American, Mexican And Canadian Reforestation Workers" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2506. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2506 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2506 For more information, please contact [email protected]. In The Pines: A Visual Ethnography Of American, Mexican And Canadian Reforestation Workers Abstract An ethnographic film with supplementary written materials, this dissertation examines the lived experiences of reforestation workers in the United States and Canada. The dissertation is based on fieldwork conducted from November 2012 – February 2015, including time spent with three different reforestation crews, one comprised of Mexicans, one of Americans, and one of Canadians. It also relies on oral histories of former and company owners and other individuals who formed and grew the earliest interstate reforestation contracting companies, as well as archival research in the records of the South Eastern Forestry Contractors Alliance My work uses liminality as a framework for understanding the lived experiences of these workers, and I have created the term “liminal labor” to describe jobs that require liminality of workers. The Canadian planters experience the job in a manner akin to a traditional rite of passage, a brief experience that defines them ot their community and teaches them skills they will rely on throughout their adult life, but the American and Mexicans planters experience long-term liminality, an extended period that can last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Sound Recordings Collected by Ian Bryson, 1995-1996
    Finding aid BRYSON_I01 Sound recordings collected by Ian Bryson, 1995 - 1996 Prepared February 2018 by BS Last updated 6 April 2018 Page 1 of 103 ACCESS Availability of copies Listening copies are available. Contact the AIATSIS Audiovisual Access Unit by completing an online enquiry form or phone (02) 6261 4212 to arrange an appointment to listen to the recordings or to order copies. Restrictions on listening This collection may only be listened to by those who have obtained permission from the depositor Ian Bryson as well as the AIATSIS Chief Executive Officer or AIATSIS delegate. Refer to audition sheets below for more details. Restrictions on use This collection is restricted and may only be copied by those who have obtained permission from the depositor Ian Bryson as well as the AIATSIS Chief Executive Officer or AIATSIS delegate. Refer to audition sheets below for more details. Permission must be sought from the depositor Ian Bryson as well as the AIATSIS Chief Executive Officer or AIATSIS delegate for any publication or quotation of this material. Any publication or quotation must be consistent with the Copyright Act (1968). The copyright for item 043205 in this collection is owned by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE Date: 1995 - 1996 Extent: 23 audiocassettes (approximately 90 min. each) Production history This collection contains interviews with people closely involved with the AIAS Film Unit. The interviews were conducted between 1995 and 1996 by the depositor Ian Bryson in conjunction with his Masters thesis; interviewees are Jeremy Beckett, Curtis Levy, Peter Hamilton, Robert Edwards, Nicolas Peterson, Kenneth Maddock, Roger Sandall, Laurie Fitzgerald, Martha Ansara, Jeremy Long, David MacDougall, Judith MacDougall, Stephen Wild, Ian Dunlop and Cecil Holmes.
    [Show full text]