Context and Concludes with a Summary of Needs and Opportunities, Which Sets the Stage for the Campus Master Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Context and Concludes with a Summary of Needs and Opportunities, Which Sets the Stage for the Campus Master Plan 2 The Campus Master Plan acknowledges uOttawa’s historical development and responds to the campus’s urban setting and physical condition. It also considers growth projections and broader campus trends that will influence future development. This section describes the planning context and concludes with a summary of needs and opportunities, which sets the stage for the Campus Master Plan. Context 2.1 Brief History of Campus Development The University of Ottawa was founded in 1848 2 on the grounds of Notre Dame Cathedral in Lower Town. In 1856, the College moved to a new building between Wilbrod and Theodore (now Laurier) in what is now known as the CONTEXT Sandy Hill Campus. The University has changed dramatically since 1856. Then, it was the College of Bytown - a small, all-male Catholic college created and administered by the Oblate Fathers of Mary Immaculate. During and after WWII the University saw construction of several new buildings, and enrollment increased significantly as veterans and young people were encouraged to seek higher education. The growth and development that has occurred in the past 50 years, guided by a series of master plans, has dramatically changed the Figure 2-1 1903 Campus Plan main campus of the University. From 1960 to 1980, the University went through an era of construction that resulted in many new Founded New Status WWII buildings, including three residences, the The College of Bytown is University of Ottawa is University grounds University Centre, the main library, a sports field founded founded used for WWII training and several faculty buildings. Steady growth exercises since the 1980s has led to such landmark 1848 1856 1866 1905 1940’s buildings as SITE and more recently Desmarais and the Faculty of Social Sciences. New Campus Tabaret Hall The University moves to Tabarat Hall built new campus Sandy Hill Master Plans/ Master Plan Update 1903 12 UOTTAWA CAMPUS MASTER PLAN DRAFT Figure 2-2 1968 Campus Plan Independent Bilingualism SITE Lees Campus Lees Station Area University The Province mandates uOttawa opens the uOttawa acquires uOttawa acquires lands uOttawa becomes a publicly strengthened bilingualism SITE building the former Algonquin around Lees LRT station funded University. at uOttawa College lands from the City 1965 1970’s 1974 1982 2002 2006 2007 2012 2013 New Buildings Alta Vista Peter Morand Social Sciences Jack Turcott (UCU), Roger Guindon Hall uOttawa acquires uOttawa opens the Montpetit and Morisset opens in the Ottawa the Peter Morand Faculty of Social Library are built Hospital campus properties Sciences building 1960 1968 1984 1992 2004 2014 CHAPTER 2 Context 13 2.2 The Campus and the City The University of Ottawa has a central role A transit-oriented campus 2 in the national capital region both physically The University’s central location makes the and economically. Directly and indirectly it campus easy to access by foot, bicycle or contributes over $4 billion annually to the car, but public transit is the key to maintaining regional economy. Not only is uOttawa a major a walkable campus and reducing its CONTEXT employer and purchaser of goods and services, environmental footprint. Today there is an but its graduates, well represented in the city’s extremely high rate of transit usage by students, public and private sectors, also earn higher faculty and staff to access the campus (83% incomes and are a source of innovation. With of commuters), and this will only increase over 42,000 students and over 8,000 academic when the Confederation LRT Line is completed and support staff roles, the combined spending in 2018. The line will include stations at the power results in 1.17 billion dollars in economic existing University and Lees BRT stations, while activity each year. the Laurier BRT station will be replaced with Physically, the campus is within walking distance a station on Rideau. Headways for the LRT of Parliament Hill, City Hall, the Rideau Canal, vehicles will be short for maximum convenience. Byward Market, the Rideau Centre and many The Confederation Line, extending from Tunney’s of the city’s cultural attractions. The campus’s Pasture in the west to Blair Station in the east downtown location is much appreciated by and including a tunnel through the downtown students, faculty and staff, and conversely core, will put much more of the city within a downtown businesses and cultural venues short commute of the campus. Students, faculty benefit from the University population. Many and staff living close to any of the stations will be central city residents also take advantage of able to reach the campus in 20 minutes or less. on-campus facilities, like the library, recreational As more students seeking affordable off-campus facilities and performance spaces. housing take advantage of the LRT, the pressure on neighbourhoods adjacent to the campus to accommodate student housing should gradually diminish. The line will also reduce the perceived distance between the core of campus and the Lees Station area. Figure 2-3 The City and Rapid Transit Context 14 UOTTAWA CAMPUS MASTER PLAN DRAFT Existing Pedestrian Priority Route Primary Community Hub University of Ottawa Proposed Pedestrian Priority Route Academic/Administration Existing Housing Surrounding Neighbourhoods Secondary Community Hub Aliated Institution Existing Sidewalk Academic-Mixed use Potential Housing Sites Existing Food Service University of Ottawa Property LRT Line/Station General Mixed use Proposed Sidewalk University of Ottawa Property University of Ottawa Property-Under Option Proposed Food Service Neighbourhood Residential LRT Downtown Tunnel/Station Pathway Athletic/Recreational -Mixed use uOttawa Leased/Partnership Property Existing/Proposed Food Service Future LRT Existing Multi-Use Pathway Academic Mixed-Use/Athletics and Recreation Future LRT Line/Station At-Grade Active Frontage Open Space Existing BRT Line/Stop Future Multi-Use Pathway Somerset Pedestrian/Cycling Corridor Precinct Boundary Existing Sports Complex/Field Future BRT Line/Stop Future Pedestrian Bridge Existing Utility Tunnels uOttawa Shuttle Bus Academic Existing Pedestrian Bridge University of Ottawa Car Free Area Teaching and research facilities; administrative uses; Proposed New Utility Tunnels ancillary student residences and services O-Train Existing Pedestrian/Bike Tunnel Existing uOttawa Open Space Academic Mixed-Use Existing Utility Tunnels Teaching and research facilities; administrative uses; Downtown Ottawa Future Pedestrian Tunnel Proposed uOttawa Open Space student residences; ancillary services and retail General Mixed-Use Potential Student Housing Site Major Open Space Existing Trac Light Sport Complex/Field General apartment residential; general oce; administrative uses; teaching and research facilities; Core Precinct-Student Housing Strategy student residences; ancillary services and retail uOttawa Existing Building Proposed Trac Light One Way Street-Existing Neighbourhood Residential Existing Student Housing Building General apartment residential; detached, semi- ; Potential Development Site Two Way Street-Existing detached or row houses; student residences Student Housing Building Building for Renewal One Way Street (Proposed) Athletics and Recreation for Demolition Athletic and recreation facilities; student residences; uOttawa Existing Building ancillary teaching and research facilities; services and retail Building for Demolition Two Way Street (Proposed) Academic Mixed-Use/Athletics and Recreation Precinct Boundary Building for Renewal Teaching and research facilities; athletic and recreation facilities; Neighbourhood Renewal administrative uses; student residences; ancillary services Proposed Street Redesign with Cycling and Transit Building for Demolition Facilities (Refer to Arts Court Rideau Public Realm Plan Options - Major Open Space Housing Co-op Functional Design to be Conrmed) Key Site to be Considered for Partnership Precinct Boundary Neighbourhood Renewal Private Driveway (Proposed) Potential Site to be Considered for Partnership City of Ottawa Cycling Facilities Existing Trac Light Primary Existing Vehicle Route Existing Bike Lanes NCC Property (Under Long Term Lease by the City) Fit Proposed Trac Light Proposed Vehicle Route Proposed Bike Lanes Future uOttawa Building(Conceptual) Decient Existing Shared Pedestrian Priority Street or other Dedicated Bike Facilities Proposed Bike Lane Existing uOttawa Building Unt Existing Multi-Use Pathway Proposed Shared Pedestrian Priority Street Existing Multi-Use Pathway Future LRT Line/Station Co-op Future Multi-Use Pathway Existing Pedestrian Only Route Future Multi-Use Pathway uOttawa Shuttle Bus Existing Building Future Bike/Pedestrian Bridge Existing uOttawa Building Existing Pedestrian Only Route OC Transpo Bus Routes Primary Community Hub Existing Bike/Pedestrian Bridge Future uOttawa Building Footprint (Conceptual) Proposed Pedestrian Only Route STO Bus Route 200/Terminal Secondary Community Hub Existing Pedestrian/Bike Tunnel Existing street which may require realignment Existing/Proposed uOttawa Open Space STO Bus Route 300 Existing Sports Field * Future Pedestrian/Bike Tunnel (Not Owned by uOttawa) Group 1: Heritage Future uOttawa Building (Conceptual) uOttawa Cycling Facilities Group 2: Heritage Interest Existing uOttawa Building Existing Bike Lanes Group 3: Contributing Compatible Student Housing University of Proposed Bike Lanes CHAPTER 2 Context 15 Ottawa Property or other Dedicated Bike Facilities Group 4: Of No Heritage Interest Academic uOttawa
Recommended publications
  • General Manager, Transportation Services, Vivi Chi, Director, Services Department Transportation Planning
    M E M O / N O T E D E S E R V I C E Information previously distributed / Information distribué auparavant TO: Transportation Committee DESTINATAIRE : Comité des transports FROM: John Manconi, Contact: Phil Landry, Director, Traffic General Manager, Transportation Services, Vivi Chi, Director, Services Department Transportation Planning EXPÉDITEUR : John Manconi, Personne ressource : Philippe Landry, Directeur général, Direction générale Gestionnaire, Services de la circulation, des transports Vivi Chi, Planification des transports, DATE: February 27, 2018 27 février 2018 FILE NUMBER: ACS2018-TSD-GEN-0001 SUBJECT: Report on the use of Delegated Authority during 2017 by the Transportation Services Department as set out in Schedule “G” Transportation Services of By-law 2016-369 OBJET : Rapport sur l’utilisation de Délégation de pouvoirs en 2017 par la direction générale des Services des Transports, comme il est indiqué à l’annexe G Services des Transports, du régulant 2016-369 PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to report to the Transportation Committee on the use of delegated authority for 2017 under Schedule ‘G’ – Transportation Services of By- Law 2016-369. 1 BACKGOUND By-law 2016-369 is “a by-law of the City of Ottawa respecting the delegation of authority to various officers of the City”. The By-law was enacted by Council on November 9, 2016 and is meant to repeal By-law No. 2014-435. This By-Law provides delegated authority to officers within the Transportation Services Department to perform various operational activities, and requires that use of delegated authority be reported to the appropriate standing committee at least once per year.
    [Show full text]
  • By Email January 15, 2021 Mayor
    By Email January 15, 2021 Mayor Jim Watson 110 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1 Dear Mayor Watson: Poorly Conceived Ward Boundary Change (uOttawa - Lees Campus) Affecting Capital Ward The Old Ottawa East Community Association respectfully requests that a change made during the course of the Ward Boundary Review be reversed before the by-law is proclaimed January 27, 2021. The change does not meet the City’s criteria required for a ward boundary change. Specifically, on December 9, 2020 City Council approved ward boundary changes that included the transfer of the University of Ottawa’s Lees Avenue campus from Capital Ward to Rideau-Vanier. This transfer was introduced by an unknown party near the end of the lengthy ward boundary consultation process but the Old Ottawa East Community Association and the Old Ottawa East community were not made aware of the change until after FEDCO had blessed it. Specifically, the “Recommendations Report” for Council recommended: “Move the Gee-Gees sports field from W6-19 (Capital) to W6-17 (Rideau-Vanier). The reasons given refer to a better boundary (the River rather than Highway 417) and the area’s association with sports facilities directly to the north in Rideau-Vanier. In the recommended ward boundary configuration, the Gee-Gees sports field is moved from W6-19 to W6-17. There are no residents in this area.” (p23) The report later says: “At Robinson Park and Gee Gees Field, #417 is not a big boundary; use the River instead.” (p34) …/2 - 2 - The fundamental criterion for making ward boundary changes is to “achieve voter parity." The transfer of the Lees campus will be detrimental to voter parity because Rideau-Vanier is forecast to grow faster than Capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban and Historic Context
    Architectural Rejuvenation Project URBAN AND HISTORIC CONTEXT Barry Padolsky Associates Inc., Architects, Urban Design and Heritage Consultants February 13, 2015 Aerial view of National Arts Centre (2010) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................................2 Urban and Historic Context........................................................................................................2 . The Holt/Bennett Plan ................................................................................................................4 The Gréber Plan .........................................................................................................................6 The Parkin Plan ...........................................................................................................................8 Architecture and National Identity: the Centennial Projects .......................................................9 NAC: The Architectural Challenge ............................................................................................10 The Architectural Response .....................................................................................................13 Architectural Style: Polite “Brutalism” ......................................................................................16 Re-inventing “Brutalism”..........................................................................................................17 NCC Canada’s
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Faqs__Transit Service During Confed Line
    Transit Service During Confederation Line Construction – Updates for 2016 REPORT TRANSIT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FAQs REPORT Transit Service During Confederation Line Construction – Updates for 2016 TITLE DIVISION: Customer Systems and Planning BRANCH Service Planning REPORT Pat Scrimgeour, Assistant General Manager, Customer Date: January 26, 2016 AUTHOR Systems and Planning SCHEDULED DATES FOR REPORT GM’s REVIEW OF REPORT TRANSIT COMMISSION COUNCIL January 19, 2016 February 17, 2016 N/A Q1. How long will the Confederation Line construction service adjustments last for? What are the next phases for service adjustments? A1. The O-Train Confederation Line is scheduled to open in 2018. Service adjustments will take place in sequential phases as sections of the Transitway undergo construction work. Each section of Transitway that closes for conversion to light rail will never reopen for bus operations. The remaining Transitway closures are: • April 2016 – Laurier Station to Lees Station; and • June 2016 – Tunney's Pasture Station to Merton Street. Timelines will be updated as information becomes available. Service adjustment plans will be implemented as these closures take effect. Stations will remain open during the construction period, with the exceptions of Cyrville Station, which was closed in June 2015, and Campus Station, which will close in April 2016. Q2. What are the main highlights of upcoming transit service adjustments during Confederation Line Construction? A2. The following are the main highlights of upcoming transit service adjustments during O- Train Confederation Line Construction: • On April 24, 2016, the Transitway will close between Laurier Station and Lees Station. Most transit service along this section of the Transitway will be relocated to Nicholas Street and Highway 417, using the bus-only lanes that have been built for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Old Ottawa East Community Association Board Tuesday, 11 December 2018, 7P.M
    Meeting of the Old Ottawa East Community Association Board Tuesday, 11 December 2018, 7p.m. Old Town Hall, 61 Main Street MINUTES Attendance Board Members Others Tom Deadman Rainari Castro-Mejia Alexandra Gruca-Macauley Taylor Marquis Don Fugler Doug Macauley Phyllis Odenbach-Sutton Wendy McRae Jocelyn Kearney Sarah Viehbeck Bob Gordon Bill Baldwin Heather Jarrett Christian Pupp Richard Cundall John Jarrett John Dance Lorna Kingston Ron Rose Monica Helm Jamie Girard Bonnie Weppler Mark Seebaran Tina Raymond Tom Scott Peter Tobin Suzanne Johnston Cynthia Dwyer Joan Batucan Kenn Rankine Bob Parkins Adriana Beaman Peter Beaman Sam Hersh Shawn Menard Rebecca Aird 1. Call to Order – Phyllis Odenbach-Sutton 2. Approval of Agenda (as amended) Moved: Don Fugler; Second: Jamie Girard; Carried 3. Presentation by students from Saint Paul University Students will be holding a public consultation on December 13th about a neighbourhood pub with social engagement focus that they are hoping to open in OOE Student-driven initiative All OOE residents encouraged to attend the consultation session 4. Approval of October 2018 Minutes Moved: John Dance; Second: Heather Jarrett; Carried 1 5. Chair's Report – Phyllis Odenbach-Sutton Report attached as Appendix A Highlights: o AGM: Great turnout at AGM this year, it was a good opportunity to meet new neighbours . At AGM, made mention of gaps in current OOECA board (Lees Ave and Spenceville reps, SLOE rep) – following the AGM, Tom Deadman agreed to hold the Lees position, Alexandra Gruca-Macauley will fill
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Commissions: Threads of an Ottawa Planning History
    Document generated on 09/24/2021 11:42 p.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine A History of Commissions Threads of An Ottawa Planning History Ken Hillis Volume 21, Number 1, October 1992 Article abstract Early planning in Ottawa takes the form of a piece-meal architectural URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019246ar admixture. On paper there remains a series of largely unrealized proposals DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar designed to promote an image symbolic of national identity. Successive federal and municipal agencies worked to various degrees of success to augment See table of contents Ottawa's appearance and amenity. British planner Thomas Adams' departure from, and the subsequent demise of the Federal Commission of Conservation in the early 1920's marked a low point in efforts to evolve comprehensive Publisher(s) planning strategies. The career of Noulan Cauchon, first head of the Ottawa Town Planning Commission, aimed to keep the notion of planning alive in the Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine city. Certain of his little-acknowledged proposals bear remarkable similarity to the pre-W.W. II planning efforts of MacKenzie King and Jacques Greber. ISSN Cauchon's legacy endures in proposals which appear to have been incorporated into federal planning activities during the post-war era. 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Hillis, K. (1992). A History of Commissions: Threads of An Ottawa Planning History. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 21(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1992 This document is protected by copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-April.Pdf
    2015 April 2/28/2015 SDTCA-3 April, 2015 04/01/2015( ) 3:00PM Brian Hu Asian Films 04/04/2015( ) 9:00AM : Old Coach Trail – Highland Valley Road 14225 Highland Valley Road, Escondido,CA 92025 860-904-3844(Cell) 858-208-5223(Cell) 04/04/2015( ) 1:00PM 04/05/2015( ) 4:00PM Song H. An Technical Performance Review and Discussion on the Biotech Stocks in Our Group Watch List [email protected] 04/11/2015( ) 2:00PM : 04/18/2015( ) 9:00AM : Volcan Mountain at Julian (need carpool) Dudley’s Famous Bakery (30218 Highway 78, Santa Ysabel CA 92070 860- 904-3844(Cell) 858-208-5223(Cell) 04/22/2015( ) 2:15PM : 04/25/2015( ) 2:00PM : Conjoined Twins: A Fascinating Story 05/02/2015( ) 9:00AM : Iron Mountain Trail head parking lot 860-904-3844(Cell) 858-208-5223(Cell) 05/03/2015( ) 4:00PM Long Lee Prediction of Market Trend Added by Technical Analysis [email protected] 02/28/2015( ) 5:30PM TAFSD/TACC 03/14/2015( ) 2:00PM : SDTCA-4 April, 2015 2015 4 15 -1 2015 15 -0 $30 (SDTCA) 15 -0 858-603-0135, [email protected] $120 $60 ( ) $140 $70 ( ) $10 $20 $30 ( ) 858-444-7164 [email protected]. Rosa Ken Fu / SDTCA-5 April, 2015 Kenneth Fu 228 228 228 228 Kenneth Tonya Tonya / slideshow 2014 SDTCA-6 check out DVD April, 2015 handout - Nissan Toyota Prius (2008) Leaf 1. $40000 2. 10,000 rebates 3. 5 cents per mile. Nissan overall 4. 1980 carpool El Cajon 5. / 440V 220V 10 miles highway < 65mph 110V < 40mph 3 miles 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Office Investment Opportunity in the Urban Heart of Downtown Ottawa
    For Sale — 340 MacLaren Street For Sale Office Investment Opportunity in 340 MacLaren Street the urban heart of Downtown Ottawa Unit 1 Level 3 340 MacLaren Street Ottawa, ON – Fully leased to two tenants at attractive rates – Located in pedestrian friendly Centretown, close to shopping, restaurants, nightlife, coffee shops, City Dave Johnston* Hall, Parliament Hill, and much more Senior Sales Associate Capital Markets, Ottawa – Convenient access to necessities like grocery stores, +1 613 656 0153 pharmacies, transit, Queensway Highway, etc. [email protected] – 3 underground parking spaces included *Sales representative – 700m to Parliament LRT Station For Sale — Property Details 340 MacLaren Street Building Highlights Property Specifications Located in pedestrian friendly Centretown Address: 340 MacLaren Street, Unit 1 Level 3 Ottawa, ON Ownership Condominium Type: Convenient Size: 5,000 SF elevator access Parking: 3 Indoor Spaces Condo Fees: $3,068.30 /month Private third floor $1,144.56 /year for parking balcony space in Unit Property Tax: $23,578.68 (2020) $375.57 (2020) for parking Price: $1,695,000 A five-minute walk to the LRT For Sale — Office Condominium For Sale 340 MacLaren Street Boardroom Main Lobby Reception Private Offices Unit features a private third floor balcony 7 2 4 15 7 8 ca Street Caadia Larer vene at Parliaent 19 11 n dwar vene 18 12 een Street Prtae re 16 9 Ottaa ert Street City all ca Street entn Street Beckta Sater Street 6 1 Larer vene at e rewa Kent Street n Street Sansote amen an StreetP ceterFarm
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Act Section 7.1 Notice of Completion of Ministry Review
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT SECTION 7.1 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF MINISTRY REVIEW AN INVITATION TO COMMENT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CITY OF OTTAWA NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR LRT PROJECT An environmental assessment (EA) was submitted to the Ministry of the Environment by the City of Ottawa to construct and implement a 31 km twin-track, electrically powered Light Rail Transit (LRT) service between downtown Ottawa near the Rideau Centre to the southern terminus in the future Barrhaven Town Centre. The proposed undertaking also includes: - access to 34 stops/stations; - four new Park and Ride lots; - a rail yard for storage and maintenance; - seventeen electric substations to power the trains; and - provision for integration of bus transit services. The Ministry of the Environment has prepared a Review of the EA for review and comment by the public, agencies and aboriginal peoples. The Review does not determine whether the project should be approved. This decision is made by the Minister of the Environment following the five week comment period and the consideration of all submissions. You can now submit comments on the undertaking, the environmental assessment, and the ministry Review. You may also request that the Minister refer the application to the Environmental Review Tribunal for a hearing. If you request a hearing you must state in your submission whether you are requesting a hearing on the whole application or on only specified matters related to the proposed undertaking. HOW TO GET THE INFORMATION YOU NEED You can inspect the EA and the ministry Review during normal business hours at the following locations: - 2 - City of Ottawa Client Service Centres Kanata Client Service Centre 80 Terry Fox Drive, Ottawa ON K2L 4C2 Ben Franklin Place Client Service Centre 101 Centrepointe Drive, Nepean ON K2G 5K7 Orléans Client Service Centre 255 Centrum Blvd., Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa Transportation Report.Pdf
    OTTAWA THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ON HOUSING VALUES IN THE OTTAWA REGION Don R Campbell, Senior Analyst Melanie Reuter, Director of Research Allyssa Epp, Research Analyst WWW.REINCANADA.COM AUTHORS Don R. Campbell, Senior Analyst, REIN Ltd Melanie Reuter, Director of Research, REIN Ltd Allyssa Fischer, Research Analyst, REIN Ltd © The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd. 6 – 27250 58 Cr Langley, BC V4W 3W7 Tel (604) 856-2825 Fax (604) 856-0091 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Page: www.reincanada.com Important Disclaimer: This Report, or any seminars or updates given in relation thereto, is sold, or otherwise provided, on the understanding that the authors – Don R. Campbell, Melanie Reuter, Allyssa Fischer, and The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd and their instructors, are not responsible for any results or results of any actions taken in reliance upon any information contained in this report, or conveyed by way of the said seminars, nor for any errors contained therein or presented thereat or omissions in relation thereto. It is further understood that the said authors and instructors do not purport to render legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial planning or other professional advice. The said authors and instructors hereby disclaim all and any liability to any person, whether a purchaser of this Report, a student of the said seminars, or otherwise, arising in respect of this Report, or the said seminars, and of the consequences of anything done or purported to be done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or part, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Report or the said seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandra Bridge Replacement Project
    Alexandra Bridge Replacement Project PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT OCTOBER TO DECEMBE R , 2 0 2 0 Table of Contents I. Project description .................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Background ........................................................................................................................................ 3 B. Project requirements ..................................................................................................................... 3 C. Project timeline ................................................................................................................................ 4 D. Project impacts ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. Public consultation process............................................................................................................ 5 A. Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 5 a. Consultation objectives ............................................................................................................ 5 b. Dates and times ............................................................................................................................ 5 B. Consultation procedure and tools ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile for LOWER TOWN, OTTAWA, ON
    Community Profile for LOWER TOWN, OTTAWA, ON LEGEND A child’s early development is shaped by different sectors of influence: Map WHAT DOES OUR COMMUNITY LOOK LIKE? DEMOGRAPHICS AGE DISTRIBUTION CHILD FAMILY COMMUNITY Demographics L. Town Ottawa Population in 2011 12,183 883,391 19+ Years 0 to 6 years Why are Population Demographics Important? 4% Population in 2006 11,377 812,129 Collectively, population counts by age group and population growth can 90% 10% 3% 7 to 12 years Population change (%) 7.1% 8.8% help us to adapt to the needs of the population as it changes over time. 3% 13 to 18 years Population density measures how closely people live together in a Land area (square km) 2.1 2,790 geographic area. The higher the number, the more people live within Population per km2 5,918 317 that area. Park area (square km) 0.08 43.1 Population Counts L. Town Ottawa 2 Total 12,180 882,355 Why are Park Areas Important? Population per km 146,024 20,500 Aged 0 to 18 yrs 1,240 193,795 Source: 2011 Census, Population and Dwelling Counts. Green spaces, like park areas, can enhance the community’s well-being Aged 0 to 6 yrs 500 68,440 in several areas: social, recreational, environmental, physical and Source: 2011 Census, Age Characteristics. mental health, educational and economic. They filter pollutants and dust from the air, they provide shade and lower temperatures in urban CRIME RATES AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT areas, and they even reduce erosion of soil into our waterways.
    [Show full text]