DOCSLIB.ORG

COLLECTIVE ACTION and RATIONALITY in the ANTI-TERROR AGE by Heidi Reynolds-Stenson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COLLECTIVE ACTION and RATIONALITY in the ANTI-TERROR AGE by Heidi Reynolds-Stenson “Building A Wall of Resistance:” Collective Action and Rationality in the Anti-Terror Age Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Reynolds-Stenson, Heidi Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 01:47:49 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630175 “BUILDING A WALL OF RESISTANCE:” COLLECTIVE ACTION AND RATIONALITY IN THE ANTI-TERROR AGE by Heidi Reynolds-Stenson _____________________________________ Copyright © Heidi Reynolds-Stenson 2018 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF SOCIOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2018 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that an accurate acknowledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: Heidi Reynolds-Stenson 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my mentor Jennifer Earl, who has been a steadfast source of knowledge, wisdom, encouragement and friendship over the past several years. I would furthermore like to thank my committee members Robin Stryker and Jane Zavisca for their invaluable guidance and support, as well as the many others who have provided feedback on this project at various stages, including but not limited to Luis Fernandez, Joseph West, Will Moore, Christian Davenport, David Cunningham, Pamela Oliver, Dana Moss, David Meyer, Rachel Einwohner, Mark Beissinger, Claire Brock, Hailey Reeves, and Evan Brown. I would also like to thank Kevin Sharp, Ryan Tombleson, Anne Reynolds, Adina Artzi, Olaide Adeniran, Samantha Coronado, Anthony Eulano, Jennica Schoppenhorst, and Jamie Tugenberg for their assistance with transcription, coding, and copyediting. I will also be forever grateful my friends and family for their encouragement and patience through the long and at-times difficult journey through graduate school and the completion of this project. Finally, I would like to thank the activists who shared their stories, passions, and lives with me. Without their generosity and inspiration, this project truly would not have been possible. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 9 CHAPTER 1: TOWARD AN INTEGRATED THEORY OF COLLECTIVE ACTION 10 THE “RATIONAL TURN” IN THE STUDY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 11 CRITICISM OF A RATIONAL CHOICE APPROACH TO SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 14 THE REDUCTIONISM OF RATIONAL ACTOR THEORY 15 INABILITY TO EXPLAIN VALUE FORMATION 18 TAUTOLOGICAL ATTEMPTS AT INCORPORATING CULTURAL AND EMOTIONAL FACTORS 20 TAKING STOCK OF WHAT WAS LOST IN THE RATIONAL TURN 23 THE “CULTURAL TURN” IN THE STUDY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 26 AN INCOMPLETE REVOLUTION? 32 A SUBFIELD DIVIDED 33 “THIN” CULTURE 36 COLLECTIVE ACTION, COLLECTIVE RATIONALITY 39 SHAPING SITUATIONS: REDUCING AND SHARING THE COSTS OF PROTEST 39 SHAPING ORIENTATIONS: DEFINING THE “ENDS” OF PROTEST 40 SHAPING DISPOSITIONS: CULTIVATING AN ACTIVIST IDENTITY 42 CONCLUSION 44 CHAPTER 2: REPRESSION, MOBILIZATION, AND THE CULTURAL CONSTRUCTION OF RATIONALITY 48 MIXED EFFECTS OF REPRESSION 49 MEDIATING RATIONALITY, MEDIATING REPRESSION 54 SHAPING SITUATIONS OF PROTEST AND REPRESSION 56 SHAPING ORIENTATIONS TOWARDS PROTEST AND REPRESSION 58 SHAPING DISPOSITIONS TOWARDS PROTEST AND REPRESSION 61 CONCLUSION 62 CHAPTER 3: A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE POLICING OF DISSENT IN THE UNITED STATES, 1956-2016 64 1956-1971: THE COINTELPRO ERA 64 1972-1999: AN UNEASY PEACE 70 1999-2016: ANARCHISTS, TERRORISTS, AND OTHER BOOGEYMEN 75 THE “BATTLE IN SEATTLE” AND THE END OF NEGOTIATED MANAGEMENT 76 COUNTER-TERRORISM AND THE RISE OF THE SURVEILLANCE STATE 81 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COVERT REPRESSION 89 CONCLUSION 91 CHAPTER 4: STUDYING REPRESSION AND RESISTANCE IN THE ANTI-TERROR AGE 93 RESEARCH SETTING 94 IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS 97 ANALYSIS OF IN-DEPTH INTERVIEW DATA 103 ALL INTERVIEWS WERE TRANSCRIBED VERBATIM, WITH THE HELP OF RESEARCH ASSISTANTS. THE INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS WERE THEN QUALITATIVELY CODED USING THE QUALITATIVE CODING SOFTWARE ATLAS.TI. I DEVELOPED A CODING SCHEME ITERATIVELY OVER SEVERAL ROUNDS OF CODING, PRODUCING NEARLY 150 CODES FOCUSED ON MEASURING THE REPRESSIVE 6 EXPERIENCES OF RESPONDENTS, THEIR PARTICIPATION IN ACTIVISM OVER TIME, AND, MOST IMPORTANTLY, THE COLLECTIVE PRACTICES AND MEANINGS THAT INFLUENCED HOW THEY UNDERSTOOD, THOUGHT ABOUT, AND RATIONALIZED THEIR PARTICIPATION IN ACTIVISM AND EXPERIENCES OF REPRESSION. 103 MEASURING REPRESSION 104 MEASURING PARTICIPATION 107 MEASURING ACTIVIST CULTURE 109 QUALITATIVE CONTENT ANALYSIS 110 PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION 112 CONCLUSION 113 CHAPTER 5: REPRESSION IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER 115 RADICALIZATION AND PERSISTENCE 117 DETERRENCE AND DISENGAGEMENT 124 REPRESSION TYPE 132 EXPERIENCING DIFFERENCE TYPES OF REPRESSION 133 CONSIDERING DIFFERENT TYPES OF REPRESSION 137 REPRESSION SEVERITY 142 CONCLUSION 148 CHAPTER 6: SHAPING REPRESSIVE SITUATIONS THROUGH PREVENTION, PREPARATION, AND SUPPORT 149 THE COSTS OF REPRESSION 151 DIRECT FINANCIAL COSTS 151 CAREER AND EDUCATIONAL COSTS 153 SOCIAL COSTS 161 MITIGATING COSTS, SHAPING SITUATIONS 162 PREVENTING THE COSTS OF REPRESSION 163 PREPARING FOR THE COSTS OF REPRESSION 175 SUPPORT AND THE SHARING OF COSTS OF REPRESSION 180 LEGAL SUPPORT 183 MEDICAL SUPPORT 185 OTHER MATERIAL SUPPORT 190 EMOTIONAL SUPPORT AND SOLIDARITY 191 INSTITUTIONALIZED EMOTIONAL SUPPORT 191 INFORMAL EMOTIONAL SUPPORT 195 THE IMPORTANCE OF SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDIUALS 198 THE IMPORTANCE OF SUPPORT FOR THE GROUP 201 STRENGTHENING TIES OF SOLIDARITY 201 MOVEMENT BUILDING 203 CONCLUSION 206 CHAPTER 7: “THE ATTEMPT IS MEANINGFUL:” REDEFINING PROTEST’S ENDS 208 “ULTIMATELY, WE’RE ALL LOSING:” THE PESSIMISM OF PROTEST 209 EFFICACY AND PROTEST PARTICIPATION 213 BEYOND EFFICACY 216 EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF SUCCESS 218 WHEN MEANS BECOME ENDS: RESISTANCE AS A VICTORY 227 7 WHEN COSTS BECOME REWARDING: REPRESSION AS A SIGN OF SUCCESS 241 RESISTING THE LANGAUGE OF EFFICACY 244 CONCLUSION 246 CHAPTER 8: ACTIVIST IDENTITY SALIENCE AND REPRESSION RESILIENCE 248 IDENTITY AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT PARTICIPATION 250 ACTIVIST IDENTITY SALIENCE 252 “AN ACTIVIST EVEN WHEN I’M NOT:” ACTIVISM AS INSERPARABLE FROM SELF 255 “MY RENT ON THIS EARTH:” COMPULSION, GUILT, AND OBLIGATION 256 “I DON’T KNOW WHAT ELSE THERE IS TO DO:” TAKING ACTIVISM FOR GRANTED 260 ACTIVIST IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT 263 ACTIVIST ORIGIN STORIES 263 ACTIVIST WAR STORIES 268 PARENTING AS A CHALLENGE TO ACTIVIST IDENTITY SALIENCE 274 CONCLUSION 277 CHAPTER 9: THE FUTURE OF REPRESSION AND REPRESSION RESEARCH 280 RESISTANCE AND REPRESSION IN THE TRUMP ERA 280 SHAPING SITUATIONS, ORIENTATIONS, AND DISPOSITIONS 284 SECOND-ORDER REPRESSION EFFECTS 288 BRINGING ACTIVISTS INTO RESEARCH ON REPRESSION EFFECTS 293 FROM RECRUITMENT TO PERSISTENCE 294 AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO COLLECTIVE ACTION 296 APPENDIX A: INTERVIEW GUIDE 298 REFERENCES 307 8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Interview Subject Demographics 103 Table 2: Types of Repressive Experiences Among Respondents 135 Table 3: Types of Repressive Experiences, By Persistence/Disengagement 137 Table 4: Severity of Repressive Experiences, By Persistence/Disengagement 144 9 ABSTRACT When people come together in protest, and especially when this protest threatens public order or the status quo, states often attempt to deter and suppress protest and restore order. A perennial question among social movement scholars is whether such repression is effective at chilling protest or instead backfires, spurring greater mobilization. Empirical studies attempting to adjudicate between these two possibilities have failed to create consensus, finding a wide array of empirical consequences for repression. I propose a new way of understanding the effects of repression that draws on and synthesizes insights from both rational choice and cultural traditions in social movement theory. I develop this explanation through analysis of in-depth interviews and observations with activists in Arizona who have experienced state repression, as well as qualitative content analysis of activist literature. These data demonstrate that how individual activists perceive and respond to state repression has little to do with the type or severity of repression they experience. Rather, protest groups fundamentally shape how individuals experience and consider the risks and rewards of participation in collective action, including those related to repression and, as a result, individuals react very differently to objectively similar experiences of repression. Specifically, I document three ways in which group practices and meanings alter how individuals think about and act in response to state repression. First, groups shape how
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disaggregating the Scare from the Greens
    DISAGGREGATING THE SCARE FROM THE GREENS Lee Hall*† INTRODUCTION When the Vermont Law Review graciously asked me to contribute to this Symposium focusing on the tension between national security and fundamental values, specifically for a segment on ecological and animal- related activism as “the threat of unpopular ideas,” it seemed apt to ask a basic question about the title: Why should we come to think of reverence for life or serious concern for the Earth that sustains us as “unpopular ideas”? What we really appear to be saying is that the methods used, condoned, or promoted by certain people are unpopular. So before we proceed further, intimidation should be disaggregated from respect for the environment and its living inhabitants. Two recent and high-profile law-enforcement initiatives have viewed environmental and animal-advocacy groups as threats in the United States. These initiatives are the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) prosecution and Operation Backfire. The former prosecution targeted SHAC—a campaign to close one animal-testing firm—and referred also to the underground Animal Liberation Front (ALF).1 The latter prosecution *. Legal director of Friends of Animals, an international animal-rights organization founded in 1957. †. Lee Hall, who can be reached at [email protected], thanks Lydia Fiedler, the Vermont Law School, and Friends of Animals for making it possible to participate in the 2008 Symposium and prepare this Article for publication. 1. See Indictment at 14–16, United States v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc., No. 3:04-cr-00373-AET-2 (D.N.J. May 27, 2004), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/files/ pdffiles/shacind.pdf (last visited Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism Thomas J
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Student Theses 2015-Present Environmental Studies Spring 5-15-2016 Controlling What Is Wild: The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism Thomas J. Levendosky Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/environ_2015 Recommended Citation Levendosky, Thomas J., "Controlling What Is Wild: The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism" (2016). Student Theses 2015-Present. 33. https://fordham.bepress.com/environ_2015/33 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses 2015-Present by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Controlling What Is Wild The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism Thomas Levendosky Environmental Studies 4000: Senior Thesis May 15, 2016 1 Abstract This thesis examines the extremist side of the environmental activism commonly known as ecoterrorism, and the subsequent implications of categorizing criminal activism as terrorism. Groups such as Earth First!, the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), and the Environmental Liberation Front (ELF) strive to protect the natural world from the detrimental impacts of industrialization. Activists affiliated with these groups endorse direct action against environmentally harmful enterprises. Extremists are motivated by the belief that they are on the frontline defending the defenseless. They hope to dissuade corporations and government agencies from exploiting the natural world by exposing unethical practices and causing economic damage. The strategy of direct action can involve sabotaging of industrial equipment (monkeywrenching), arson, and tree spiking. Direct action also promotes nonviolent protest and civil disobedience to obstruct industrial development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eco-Terrorist Wave (1970-2016)
    THE ECO-TERRORIST WAVE (1970-2016) By João Raphael da Silva Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations Supervisor: Professor Matthijs Bogaards Word Count: Budapest, Hungary 2017 CEU eTD Collection 1 ABSTRACT The present research aims to shed light on the geographical and temporal spread of the ecological typology of terrorism – hereinafter referred as “Eco-Terrorism” – through the lens of the David C. Rapoport’s Wave and Tom Parker and Nick Sitter’s Strain Theories. This typology that has posed high levels of threats to the United States and the European Union member States remains uncovered by these two theoretical frameworks. My arguments are that, first, like many other typologies previously covered by the above-mentioned theories, Eco-Terrorism spread. Second, “Wave”, “Strain” or “Wavy Strain” should be able to explain the pattern followed by Eco-Terrorism. Making use of the “Contagion Effect” as an analytical tool, the present research found that, like in other typologies, as an indirect way of contagion, literary production has played a crucial role in the spread of Eco-Terrorism, with a slight difference on who was writing them. Eventually, they became leaders or members of an organization, but in most of the cases were philosophers and fiction authors. In addition, it was found that the system of organization of the ALF and the ELF contributes to the spread. As a direct way of contagion, aside from training like in other typologies, the spread occurs when members of a certain organization disaffiliate from an organization and found a new one, and sometimes when two organizations act in cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Number One. February, 2006. Free. the State Has Always Used Surveillance and Repression Against Those It Considers Threats Or Competition
    The Warrior Wind Against a Society of Confinement: “Blow, wild wind, blow!” Issue Number One. February, 2006. Free. The State has always used surveillance and repression against those it considers threats or competition. For the past decade, earth and animal liberationists have faced an escalation of such surveillance and repression. When Jeff “Free” Luers was sentenced in 2001 to over 22 years for vandalizing SUVs, many felt his sentence was an exception or anomaly. Now almost all eco-prisoners are facing similar sentences (Earth Liberation Front prisoner Chris McIntosh was facing a 30 year minimum before taking a plea deal for eight years), and the sentences prisoners face are only climbing higher. To give one example: activists with Arizona Earth First!, recently convicted merely of charges relating to interference with a mountain-lion hunt, are being threatened with sentences Bill Rodgers, drawing by Katie. of over seven years at their March hearing! Federal law enforcement alleges that those arrested on December 7th, two individuals arrested since then, three people named in indictments but not apprehended, as well as unknown others, are all members of a large “eco-terror network” responsible for a series of actions in the northwest from 1996-2001. The actions in question On the Recent Wave of Repression included attacks against genetic engineering, various On December 7th, 2005, one of the largest wilderness “management” programs, meat and lumber roundups of environmental and animal liberation companies, as well as ecocidal development in general. activists in American history began. That day the FBI The Earth Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation arrested six people in four different states and issued Front used communiqués to claim responsibility for Grand Jury subpoenas to others not then taken into some of the actions cited in the government’s indictment.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Terrorism: an Overview
    Domestic Terrorism: An Overview August 21, 2017 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44921 Domestic Terrorism: An Overview Summary The emphasis of counterterrorism policy in the United States since Al Qaeda’s attacks of September 11, 2001 (9/11) has been on jihadist terrorism. However, in the last decade, domestic terrorists—people who commit crimes within the homeland and draw inspiration from U.S.-based extremist ideologies and movements—have killed American citizens and damaged property across the country. Not all of these criminals have been prosecuted under federal terrorism statutes, which does not imply that domestic terrorists are taken any less seriously than other terrorists. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) do not officially designate domestic terrorist organizations, but they have openly delineated domestic terrorist “threats.” These include individuals who commit crimes in the name of ideologies supporting animal rights, environmental rights, anarchism, white supremacy, anti-government ideals, black separatism, and beliefs about abortion. The boundary between constitutionally protected legitimate protest and domestic terrorist activity has received public attention. This boundary is highlighted by a number of criminal cases involving supporters of animal rights—one area in which specific legislation related to domestic terrorism has been crafted. The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (P.L. 109-374) expands the federal government’s legal authority to combat animal rights extremists who engage in criminal activity. Signed into law in November 2006, it amended the Animal Enterprise Protection Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-346). This report is intended as a primer on the issue, and four discussion topics in it may help explain domestic terrorism’s relevance for policymakers: Level of Activity.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535-0001 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NATIONAL PRESS OFFICE November 19, 2008 (202) 324-3691 www.fbi.gov REWARD INCREASED FOR OPERATION BACKFIRE FUGITIVES Washington, D.C. – Today, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced an increased reward for information about fugitives being sought for their role in a domestic terrorism cell. Specifically, the FBI is offering a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to the arrest of Josephine Sunshine Overaker, Joseph Mahmoud Dibee, Justin Franchi Solondz, and Rebecca Rubin. These individuals were members of the domestic terrorism cell, referred to as “The Family,” whose criminal actions included vandalism, animal releases, arsons and attempted arsons across Oregon, Washington, California, Wyoming and Colorado. “We appreciate the assistance of our domestic and international law enforcement partners in this ongoing fugitive search,” said Executive Assistant Director Arthur M. Cummings, II, FBI National Security Branch. “These individuals are terrorists –regardless of their political or social message – their actions were criminal and in violation of federal law. The FBI has remained vigilant in the search for these individuals and will make every effort to apprehend these fugitives and bring them to justice.” From 1996 to 2001, these individuals conducted a range of criminal actions throughout the United States in the name of the Animal Liberation Front and Earth Liberation Front. They were responsible for at least 25 domestic terrorism criminal actions totaling over $80 million in damages, including the largest eco-related arson in history, a $12 million dollar arson at the Vail Ski Resort in Vail, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Scared? Lessons from the FBI Crackdown on Eco-Activists
    The Anarchist Library (Mirror) Anti-Copyright Green Scared? Lessons from the FBI Crackdown on Eco-Activists CrimethInc. CrimethInc. Green Scared? Lessons from the FBI Crackdown on Eco-Activists February 22, 2008 Retrieved on 8th November 2020 from crimethinc.com usa.anarchistlibraries.net February 22, 2008 anonymous action, they did not set out to be celebrated, but to privately do what they thought was necessary, just as all of us ought to. They are as normal as any of us—any normal per- son who takes responsibility for his or her actions is capable of tremendous things. This is not to say we should all become arsonists. Thereare countless paths available to those who would take responsibil- ity for themselves, and each person must choose the one that is most appropriate to his or her situation. Let the courage of the non-cooperating Green Scare defendants, who dared to act on their beliefs and refused to betray those convictions even when threatened with life in prison, serve as reminders of just how much normal people like us can accomplish. 27 But Aiken and her kind are responsible for a lot more than this. As the polar icecaps melt, rainforests are reduced to pulp, and climate change inflicts more and more terrible catastro- phes around the planet, they are responsible for stopping all who would take direct action to avert these tragedies. They Contents are responsible, in short, for forcing the wholesale destruction of the natural environment upon everyone else on earth. Aiken might counter that the so-called democratic system For Those Who Came in Late… ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Community Engagement & Education
    POV Community Engagement & Education DISCUSSION GUIDE If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front Directed by Marshall Curry Co-directed by Sam Cullman www.pbs.org/pov POV LETTER FROM THE FILMMAKER NEW YORK, 2011 The making of If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front consisted of a se- ries of surprises. The first surprise hit on a cold December afternoon about five years ago, when my wife came home from her job at a public relations firm and told me that four federal agents had entered her office and arrested one of her employees — Daniel McGowan — for “eco-terrorism.” He was being charged with arson against two Oregon timber compa- nies. We were shocked. I had met McGowan through my wife, and he did not fit my expec- tation of what an “eco-terrorist” would be like. He had grown up in Rockaway, Queens, was the son of a New York cop and had been a business major in college. He didn’t look or talk like a revolutionary, and to me he seemed less like Che Guevara or Malcolm X than a typical “boy next door.” Whenever reality cuts against a stereotype, and I dis- cover that the world doesn’t work the way I thought it did, I become curious. How had someone like McGowan taken part in setting these fires and found himself fac- ing life in prison for terrorism? What could lead someone to decide that arson was a rea- sonable response to environmental problems? How had this shadowy group to which he belonged — the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) — been formed, and how had the in- Director Marshall Curry vestigators cracked it? Sam Cullman (cinematographer/co-director) and I decided to Photo courtesy of Bill Gallagher find out.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploratory Analysis of Eco-Terrorism and Its Relationships to U.S
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses CAHSS Theses and Dissertations and Dissertations 1-1-2014 The Axe Without the Handle: An Exploratory Analysis of Eco-Terrorism and its Relationships to U.S. Public Policy towards Terrorism:1990-2010 Phillip Andrew Smith Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] This document is a product of extensive research conducted at the Nova Southeastern University College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences. For more information on research and degree programs at the NSU College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, please click here. Follow this and additional works at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd Part of the American Politics Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Phillip Andrew Smith. 2014. The Axe Without the Handle: An Exploratory Analysis of Eco-Terrorism and its Relationships to U.S. Public Policy towards Terrorism:1990-2010. Doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences. (5) http://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd/5. This Dissertation is brought to you by the CAHSS Theses and Dissertations at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Eco-Terrorist Wave
    1. Introduction In The Causes of Terrorism (1981), Martha Crenshaw suggests that Terrorism Studies can be organized around three segments: causes, development and sociopolitical consequences (p. 379). In Causes of Terrorism: An Expanded and Updated Review of the Literature (2004), Brynjar Lia & Katja Skjølberg concentrate on the causes. According to the authors, ‘Contagion Theories of Terrorism’ (See: Midlarsky, Crenshaw & Yoshida, 1980; Waldmann, 2005; Weimann & Brosius, 1988) ‘[...] have demonstrated that the occurrence of terrorist attacks is far from random, but that there is a clear trend of periodical cycle in the occurrence of terrorist attacks, or waves of terrorism’ [emphasis added] (p. 17). Indeed, in The Four Waves of Modern Terrorism (2004), David C. Rapoport argues that modern terrorism can be seen and understood in consecutive ‘Waves’. According to the author, these are periods linked to their concomitant generations, and characterized by ideological and tactical similarities across various organizations. Such movement composes trends that stand out over others around the globe: the ‘Anarchist Wave’ (1st) emerged in the 1880s, later replaced by the ‘Anticolonial Wave’ (2nd) in the 1920s, the ‘New Left Wave’ (3rd) in the 1960s, and the ‘Religious Wave’ (4th) since 1979 and likely to last until 2025 (p. 47). Subsequently, several authors conducted research on Rapoport’s Wave Theory. Some test and corroborate it, such as Karen Rasler & William R. Thompson (2009) and Leonard Weinberg & William Eubank (2010). Jeffrey Kaplan (2007, 2008, 2016) goes beyond corroborating it to argue that there is an ongoing ‘New Tribalistic Wave’ (5th). Albert J. Bergesen & Omar Lizardo (2004), William R. Thompson (2006) and Mark Sedgwick (2007) develop their own Wave Theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Extent and Impact of Surveillance on Animal Rights Activists
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones May 2017 Examining the Extent and Impact of Surveillance on Animal Rights Activists Cassandra Boyer University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Repository Citation Boyer, Cassandra, "Examining the Extent and Impact of Surveillance on Animal Rights Activists" (2017). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2948. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/10985781 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXAMINING THE EXTENT AND IMPACT OF SURVEILLANCE ON ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS By Cassandra Boyer Bachelor of Arts – Criminal Justice University of Las Vegas, Nevada 2014 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts – Criminal Justice Department of Criminal Justice Greenspun College of Urban Affairs The Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas May 2017 Thesis Approval The Graduate College The University of Nevada, Las Vegas April 17, 2017 This thesis prepared by Cassandra Boyer entitled Examining the Extent and Impact of Surveillance on Animal Rights Activists is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts – Criminal Justice Department of Criminal Justice Emily Troshynski, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]