DOCSLIB.ORG

Del Mar Corridor Study – Recommendation/Stakeholder Mobility Tool Preferences Evaluation Participants Were Then Asked to Rank These Measures in Terms of Importance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Del Mar Corridor Study – Recommendation/Stakeholder Mobility Tool Preferences Evaluation Participants Were Then Asked to Rank These Measures in Terms of Importance Laredo Urban Transportation Study Del Mar Boulevard Corridor Study Metropolitan Planning Organization Final Report October, 2011 Prepared by: Alliance Transportation Group, Inc.-- TBPE Firm No. F-812 11500 Metric Boulevard, Building M-1, Suite 150 Austin, TX 78758 Laredo Urban Transportation Study – Metropolitan Planning Organization – Del Mar Boulevard Corridor Study Acknowledgements Lead Agency Laredo Urban Transportation Study Nathan Bratton – MPO Director Vanessa Guerra – MPO Coordinator Participating Agencies City of Laredo Texas Department of Transportation – Laredo District Consultant Team Alliance Transportation Group, Inc. Steven J. Miller, P.E. J. Michael Heath, P.E. Scott Feldman, P.E., PTOE Jacob Benfield, P.E., PTOE Sowmya Chandrasekhar, E.I.T. AMEC (Formerly MACTEC, Inc.) Salvador Mercado, P.E. Gilpin Engineering Company Judd Gilpin, P.E. Edward Ochoa, P.E. Ximenes & Associates, Inc. Linda Ximenes Sonia Jimenez October, 2011 Page 1 Laredo Urban Transportation Study – Metropolitan Planning Organization – Del Mar Boulevard Corridor Study October, 2011 Page 2 Laredo Urban Transportation Study – Metropolitan Planning Organization – Del Mar Boulevard Corridor Study Table of Contents 3.4 Stakeholder Mobility Tool Preferences ............................................................................................ 28 3.5 Stakeholder Measures of Effectiveness ........................................................................................... 31 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 Project Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 33 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Analysis Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 33 1.1 Purpose of Study ................................................................................................................................ 7 4.2 Mobility Tools ................................................................................................................................... 33 1.2 Study Area .......................................................................................................................................... 7 4.2.1 Thru Capacity Improvements.................................................................................................... 33 1.3 Study Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................ 7 4.2.2 Channelized (Raised) Medians .................................................................................................. 33 2.0 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 9 4.2.3 Turn Lanes or Auxiliary Lanes ................................................................................................... 33 2.1 Area Description ................................................................................................................................. 9 4.2.4 Driveway Consolidation/Access Management ......................................................................... 33 2.1.1 Land Uses .................................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.5 Signal Modification ................................................................................................................... 34 2.1.2 Planned Projects in the Area....................................................................................................... 9 4.2.6 Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit Improvements ........................................................................ 34 2.1.3 Right-of-Way ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.7 Alternate Roadways .................................................................................................................. 35 2.1.4 Transit ....................................................................................................................................... 10 4.2.8 Alternative Intersections .......................................................................................................... 35 2.2 Roadway Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 11 4.3 Future Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................................................... 36 2.2.1 Roadway Segment Characteristics ............................................................................................ 11 4.4 Existing and Future No-Build Conditions ......................................................................................... 36 2.2.2 Driveways and Access ............................................................................................................... 14 4.5 Analysis of Mobility Improvement Recommendations.................................................................... 39 2.2.3 Intersections ............................................................................................................................. 15 4.5.1 Synchro Analysis – Build Conditions ......................................................................................... 39 2.2.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure ....................................................................................... 16 4.5.2 Del Mar and McPherson Road .................................................................................................. 39 2.3 Data Collection ................................................................................................................................. 16 4.5.3 Qualitative Improvements ........................................................................................................ 39 2.3.1 24-Hour Tube Count Locations ................................................................................................. 17 4.6 Improvement Recommendations .................................................................................................... 41 2.3.2 Peak Hour Turning Movement Count Locations ...................................................................... 17 5.0 Final Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 43 2.3.3 12-hour Traffic Signal Warrant Study ....................................................................................... 17 5.1 Final Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 43 2.3.4 Video GPS Runs ......................................................................................................................... 17 5.2 Preliminary Estimate of Probable Cost ............................................................................................ 43 2.4 Measures of Effectiveness ............................................................................................................... 18 5.3 Implementation Strategies............................................................................................................... 43 2.4.1 Intersection LOS ........................................................................................................................ 20 5.3.1 Governmental Entities .............................................................................................................. 43 2.4.2 Arterial LOS ............................................................................................................................... 20 5.3.2 Private Funding ......................................................................................................................... 43 2.5 Crash History .................................................................................................................................... 21 5.3.3 District Overlays, Associations, and Agreements ..................................................................... 43 2.6 Existing Areas of Concern ................................................................................................................. 23 References ...................................................................................................................................................... 59 2.6.1 Signal Warrant Analysis ............................................................................................................ 23 Appendix A: Traffic Data ................................................................................................................................. 61 2.6.2 Traffic Congestion Impacts on Economy, Commerce, and Environment ................................. 24 Appendix B: Synchro Model Output ............................................................................................................... 63 2.6.3 Identified Deficiencies .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Throughout Our History Differences in Race and Color Have Defined Easily Identifiable Groups Which Have at Times Required
    Case 5:20-cv-00106 Document 1 Filed on 07/06/20 in TXSD Page 1 of 51 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION ZAPATA COUNTY, TEXAS, § MELISSA CIGARROA, § CCMD, LLC & GEORGE C. § RINCON, § § CIVIL ACTION NO. _________ Plaintiffs, § § v. § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF § THE UNITED STATES; CHAD WOLF, as § the Purported Acting Secretary of THE § § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S § DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND § SECURITY and MARK A. MORGAN, as § the Acting Commissioner of THE UNITED § STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER § PROTECTION, § § Defendants. “Throughout our history differences in race and color have defined easily identifiable groups which have at times required the aid of the courts in securing equal treatment under the laws.” Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 (1954) (argued by Gustavo “Gus” C. Garcia, Laredo’s native son) “When he [Donald J. Trump] landed, he asked, ‘Is it safe for me to get down (off the plane)?’ In his mind, in his own consciousness, he perceived danger[.]”1 City of Laredo Mayor Pete Saenz recalling a conversation with Donald J. Trump, who asked if it was safe to step out of a plane in Laredo, Texas (September 2016). The Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution provides a right to due process, which guarantees equal protection to any person in the United States. Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 500 (1954). 1 Tilove Jonathan, Donald Trump persuaded by Laredo mayor to temper border wall plan, Austin American-Stateman, https://www.statesman.com/NEWS/20160904/Donald-Trump-persuaded-by-Laredo-mayor-to-temper-border-wall- plan (Posted Sep 4, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Border Crossing and Wait Time Measurement at Laredo World Trade Bridge and the Colombia-Solidarity Bridge
    Commercial Border Crossing and Wait Time Measurement at Laredo World Trade Bridge and the Colombia-Solidarity Bridge Final Report Prepared by: Texas Transportation Institute Prepared for: Texas Department of Transportation March 31, 2012 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. ii List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Background and Overview ........................................................................................... 2 Organization of the Report ......................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2: Laredo International Land Border Crossing Sites Description .................................... 4 International Bridges at Laredo .................................................................................................. 4 Descriptions of the International Bridges for Commercial Vehicles at Laredo ......................... 6 World Trade Bridge ................................................................................................................ 6 Laredo-Colombia International Bridge ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Del Rio Acuña Nuevo Laredo Laredo Eagle Pass Piedras Negras
    Del Rio Acuña Eagle Pass Piedras Negras Laredo Nuevo Laredo Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan Executive Summary Introduction Border Master Plans, as defined and supported by the U.S./Mexico Joint Working Committee on Transportation Planning and Programming, the Federal Highway Administration, and the U.S. Department of State, are comprehensive long range plans to inventory transportation and port of entry (POE) infrastructure that facilitate trade, and prioritize planned transportation and POE projects within a defined study area. The Border Master Plans represent binational stakeholder efforts to (i) prioritize and promote POE and related transportation projects; (ii) inform decision-making; (iii) allocate limited funding sources, and (iv) ensure continued dialogue and coordination on future POE and supporting transportation infrastructure needs and projects. The Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan (Border Master Plan) is the second Border Master Plan that on the U.S.-Mexico border and followed a similar approach as the California-Baja California Border Master Plan. The objectives of the Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan were to: design a stakeholder agency involvement process that is inclusive and ensure the participation of all involved in POE projects and the transportation infrastructure serving those POEs; increase the understanding of the POE and transportation planning processes on both sides of the border; develop and implement a plan for prioritizing and promoting POE and related transportation projects, including evaluation criteria and rankings over the short, medium and long term; and establish a process to ensure continued dialogue among federal, state, regional, and local stakeholder agencies in Texas and Mexico to ensure continued coordination on current and future POE and supporting transportation infrastructure needs and projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Television Channel Fcc Assignments for Us Channel Repacking (To Channels Less Than 37)
    TELEVISION CHANNEL FCC ASSIGNMENTS FOR US CHANNEL REPACKING (TO CHANNELS LESS THAN 37) March 29, 2017 LEGEND FINAL TELEVISION CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION RELATED TO INCENTIVE AUCTION REPACKING Technical Parameters for Post‐Auction Table of Allotments NOTE: These results are based on the 20151020UCM Database, 2015Oct_132Settings.xml study template, and TVStudy version 1.3.2 (patched) FacID Site Call Ch PC City St Lat Lon RCAMSL HAAT ERP DA AntID Az 21488 KYES‐TV 5 5 ANCHORAGE AK 612009 1493055 614.5 277 15 DA 93311 0 804 KAKM 8 8 ANCHORAGE AK 612520 1495228 271.2 240 50 DA 67943 0 10173 KTUU‐TV 10 10 ANCHORAGE AK 612520 1495228 271.2 240 50 DA 89986 0 13815 KYUR 12 12 ANCHORAGE AK 612520 1495228 271.2 240 41 DA 68006 0 35655 KTBY 20 20 ANCHORAGE AK 611309 1495332 98 45 234 DA 90682 0 49632 KTVA 28 28 ANCHORAGE AK 611131 1495409 130.6 60.6 28.9 DA 73156 0 25221 KDMD 33 33 ANCHORAGE AK 612009 1493056 627.9 300.2 17.2 DA 102633 0 787 KCFT‐CD 35 35 ANCHORAGE AK 610400 1494444 539.7 0 15 DA 109112 315 64597 KFXF 7 7 FAIRBANKS AK 645518 1474304 512 268 6.1 DA 91018 0 69315 KUAC‐TV 9 9 FAIRBANKS AK 645440 1474647 432 168.9 30 ND 64596 K13XD‐D 13 13 FAIRBANKS AK 645518 1474304 521.6 0 3 DA 105830 170 13813 KATN 18 18 FAIRBANKS AK 645518 1474258 473 230 16 ND 49621 KTVF 26 26 FAIRBANKS AK 645243 1480323 736 471 27 DA 92468 110 8651 KTOO‐TV 10 10 JUNEAU AK 581755 1342413 37 ‐363 1 ND 13814 KJUD 11 11 JUNEAU AK 581804 1342632 82 ‐290 0.14 DA 78617 0 60520 KUBD 13 13 KETCHIKAN AK 552058 1314018 100 ‐71 0.413 DA 104820 0 20015 KJNP‐TV 20 20 NORTH
    [Show full text]
  • Entravision Communications Corp
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 2007-03-15 | Period of Report: 2006-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-07-055499 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP Mailing Address Business Address 2425 OLYMPIC BLVD 2425 OLYMPIC BLVD CIK:1109116| IRS No.: 954783236 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 STE 6000 WEST STE 6000 WEST Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-15997 | Film No.: 07696138 SANTA MONICA CA 90404 SANTA MONICA CA 90404 SIC: 4833 Television broadcasting stations 3104473870 Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006 OR ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Transition Period from to Commission File Number 1-15997 ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 95-4783236 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2425 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 6000 West Santa Monica, California 90404 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) Registrants telephone number, including area code: (310) 447-3870 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Class A Common Stock The New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY Confidential Marketing Package
    800 GARDEN ST. LAREDO, TX INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY Confidential Marketing Package Darrell L. Betts, CCIM Guillermo J. Sepulveda Principal, Capital Markets Principal & Managing Directo Avison Young - Texas Avison Young - Mexico 713.993.7704 +52.55.4123.7570 [email protected] [email protected] RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St. Laredo, TX Table of Contents 1. Property Summary....................................................................................................................... 3 2. The Market......................................................................................................................................... 11 avisonyoungcapitalmarkets.com avisonyoung.com RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St. Laredo, TX PROPERTY SUMMARY avisonyoungcapitalmarkets.com | avisonyoung.com RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St. Laredo, TX R AMADA P LAZA L A R EDO LOCATION: 800 Garden St., Laredo, TX SIZE: +/-121,500 rentable square feet ROOMS: 203 SITE AREA: +/- 1.25 acres YEAR BUILT: 1984 STORIES: 8 PARKING: 4 floors of covered garage parking 247 spaces Four Star, full-service Ramada Plaza Laredo offers casual, modern rooms with two restaurants, outdoor pool and fitness center. Additional amenities include on-site covered garage parking, free airport shuttle, bar, café, banquet facilities, business center and meeting rooms. Seven miles to/from Laredo International Airport and only 3 miles to/from the Laredo Medical Center. 4 RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St. Laredo, TX PROPERTY PHOTOS Source of photos on this page only: https://www.wyndhamhotels.com/ramada/laredo-texas/ramada-plaza-laredo/overview 5 RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St. Laredo, TX AERIALS 6 RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St. Laredo, TX 7 RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St. Laredo, TX 8 RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St. Laredo, TX 9 RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St. Laredo, TX 10 RAMADA PLAZA LAREDO 800 Garden St.
    [Show full text]
  • He Of~'Icialh~-Publicationh~Of the Worldwide TV-FM DX a ~ 4D
    K b - e .l N C ~ Z ~_ ~ ~~~ ~~W o " `0 - 1 "fa~~° The Of~'icialh~-Publicationh~of the Worldwide TV-FM DX a ~ 4D ._. °<~~ a O Association c NOVEMBER 1995 o '~ ""' H~ C ° ~ ~ d I !~ Lzs m LAKE SUP RI R _ i t+7 ,~6 ~ CANADA ~=, t~ a~~~ ~g~ of ~+ A eo ~o _ ~ ~ ~ "°"~ i t ! : ~`~ ~ Cz f~ N ~~~, ~'~ ~~~~ ~ .~. ~ m :K C . ., i.~ ; S'G" 5 p ~~~ 4,~~ 4 c K7 ~ il' d ~ .k . ~ . m ~° ~~~ a~~~}A O . ~ ~ yC ~ z `~ _...- - f ~~^ 5 ~ s ~~~ . J ~. ~ ns ~ O ~r~ `~ ,~'~ f, l ~~~r HiiRE'N " ~ b"YI. ~ ~ ~ __~ ..b,A H i .-- i c ° . ~ O z a` '~' LAKE ,~r---~_ ~"`~ ~ ~!AICftiGAN `~ _ w.. .a .~+,a , _ - A~ v f u~rwr. k " ~ ""'^' is 4Y.Y1" t~ 5 "b"o~i IYpY , 1 ' , b§CpW Ai .^1X4 ' flknn ~W E~ ~ H "1" NIw.1 dEi~tfE I~E .~' _ v - Ilimln (Li "W. ~~ , CAUW ~ ~~_ yWn ' ' ~~ ,.,.~. a"". ~. c" .` - . ~ ~ uw a~a+~ rosce~ ~,y,u, n wu~~. ~qfC ~SU d8u "r ~~h Y .,.,i.a ~ _ ~Y ~ ~ ~. ~ "Pn (i}.. L1-R ~CAIW ~ P~w ' YAMQEE . .~ 9pu~ ~~ JGErnAW i t1i. pDB(~~.oN Ea.fb , e,~~ --~i MASON O"~ ~ 1kY". ~;Ju7VN ARENAC "cbf ~ ~uea w4 °~ bwo "w ~ d11.R ll"/yl N" _ 8win+ f ~/ OCEANA '~ ~. Wp " 8AV "," , M ~,,yy, yE~\ ".~ NUIgN 6~ ~~ , NEWAY~O ~" 5 "nlaa __ , U~ iSABEI:w ._~' WMKC 102 .9 F"" (906) 643-9494 FM WCKC 1 0 7 .1 (616) 775-1071 editor- GREG CONIGLIO WORLDWIDE TV-FM DX ASSOCIATION !r !r r 5100 GLENWOOD DRIVE SERVING THE VHF-UHF DX ENTHUSIAST rj~/~ , ~ J WILLIMASVILLE, NEW YORK 14221 e mail coniglio~geog .buffalo.ed u THE VHF-UHF DIGEST IS THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE WORLDWIDE TV-FM DX NOVEMBER 1995 TIP DEADLINE - The 10th ASSOCIATION, DEDICATED TO THE OBSERVATION AND STUDY OF THE Man of the items listed in this column are taken from the ublication : PROPAGATION OF LONG DISTANCE TELEVISION AND FM BROADCAST SIGNALS AT VHF AND UHF.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas TV Stations
    State of Texas List of television stations in Texas State of Texas From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is a list of broadcast television stations serving cities in the U.S. state of Texas.[1] * Full-power stations * LPTV stations * Mexican border stations Full-power stations[edit] VC refers to the station's PSIP virtual channel. RF refers to the station's physical RF channel. Area served City of license VC RF Callsign Network Notes Abilene Abilene 9 29 KRBC-TV NBC Abilene Sweetwater 12 20 KTXS-TV ABC Abilene Abilene 15 15 KXVA Fox Abilene Abilene 32 24 KTAB-TV CBS Amarillo Amarillo 2 8 KACV-TV PBS Amarillo Amarillo 4 19 KAMR- NBC TV Amarillo Amarillo 7 7 KVII-TV ABC Amarillo Amarillo 10 10 KFDA-TV CBS Amarillo Amarillo 14 15 KCIT Fox Amarillo Borger 31 31 KEYU UNI Austin Austin 7 7 KTBC Fox Movies on 7.2 Area served City of license VC RF Callsign Network Notes Austin Llano 14 27 KBVO MNT Austin Austin 18 22 KLRU PBS Create on 18.2, PBS Encore on 18.3, V- me on 18.4 Austin Austin 24 33 KVUE ABC Estrella TV 24.2 Weather on 24.3 Austin Austin 36 21 KXAN-TV NBC Austin Austin 42 43 KEYE-TV CBS Telemundo on 42.2 Austin Austin 54 49 KNVA CW Austin Killeen 62 13 KAKW- UNI Telefutura (KTFO) on 61.2 DT Beaumont/Port Port Arthur 4 41 KBTV-TV Fox Arthur Beaumont/Port Beaumont 6 25 KFDM CBS CW on 6.2 Arthur Beaumont/Port Beaumont 12 12 KBMT ABC NBC on 12.2 Arthur Beaumont/Port Beaumont 34 33 KITU-TV TBN Arthur Big Spring Big Spring 4 33 KWAB- NBC satellite of KWES-TV TV Brownsville/McAllen Harlingen 4 31 KGBT-TV CBS Area served City of license
    [Show full text]
  • Primary & Secondary Sources
    Primary & Secondary Sources Brands & Products Agencies & Clients Media & Content Influencers & Licensees Organizations & Associations Government & Education Research & Data Multicultural Media Forecast 2019: Primary & Secondary Sources COPYRIGHT U.S. Multicultural Media Forecast 2019 Exclusive market research & strategic intelligence from PQ Media – Intelligent data for smarter business decisions In partnership with the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers Co-authored at PQM by: Patrick Quinn – President & CEO Leo Kivijarv, PhD – EVP & Research Director Editorial Support at AIMM by: Bill Duggan – Group Executive Vice President, ANA Claudine Waite – Director, Content Marketing, Committees & Conferences, ANA Carlos Santiago – President & Chief Strategist, Santiago Solutions Group Except by express prior written permission from PQ Media LLC or the Association of National Advertisers, no part of this work may be copied or publicly distributed, displayed or disseminated by any means of publication or communication now known or developed hereafter, including in or by any: (i) directory or compilation or other printed publication; (ii) information storage or retrieval system; (iii) electronic device, including any analog or digital visual or audiovisual device or product. PQ Media and the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers will protect and defend their copyright and all their other rights in this publication, including under the laws of copyright, misappropriation, trade secrets and unfair competition. All information and data contained in this report is obtained by PQ Media from sources that PQ Media believes to be accurate and reliable. However, errors and omissions in this report may result from human error and malfunctions in electronic conversion and transmission of textual and numeric data.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report2020
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Dear ENTRAVISION SHAREHOLDERS, $OWKRXJK ZDV DQ XQSUHFHGHQWHG DQG FKDOOHQJLQJ \HDU WKDQNV WR WKH LQFUHGLEOH H΍RUWV RI WKH HQWLUH Entravision team, we enter 2021 primed for growth. With each quarter that transpired, we saw sequential revenue improvements driven by a combination of our television, audio and digital segments. For the year, Entravision achieved record revenues of $344 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $60 million, up 26% and 47% \HDURYHU\HDUUHVSHFWLYHO\2ISDUWLFXODUQRWHZHFRQWLQXHGWRH[SDQGRXUGLJLWDOR΍HULQJVZLWKDPDMRULW\ investment in Cisneros Interactive, positioning our combined platforms to be one of the largest, premier digital advertising companies serving the U.S. Hispanic and Latin American markets. Cisneros Interactive was LPPHGLDWHO\DGGLWLYHWRRXU(%Ζ7'$DQGFDVKȵRZDQGZHKDYHWKHXWPRVWFRQȴGHQFHWKDWWKH\ZLOOFRQWLQXH to successfully execute against their business plan in 2021. 6SHDNLQJRIFDVKȵRZVWURQJIUHHFDVKȵRZJHQHUDWLRQKDVKLVWRULFDOO\EHHQDFRUQHUVWRQHRI(QWUDYLVLRQȇV EXVLQHVVPRGHO'XHWRGLɝFXOWPDUNHWFRQGLWLRQVWKURXJKRXWWKH\HDUZHGHSOR\HGDQXPEHURIVWUDWHJLF steps to limit our expenses while at the same time maintain the strength of our balance sheet and encourage IUHHFDVKȵRZJHQHUDWLRQ:HHQGHGWKHIRXUWKTXDUWHUZLWKIUHHFDVKȵRZWRWDOVMXVWVK\RIGRXEOLQJRXUSULRU UHFRUGVHWLQWKHVHFRQGTXDUWHURIDQGZHH[SHFWWKLVKLJKFRQYHUVLRQRI(%Ζ7'$WRFDVKȵRZIRUWKH IRUHVHHDEOHIXWXUHDVZHRSHUDWHDVDOHDQHUPRUHHɝFLHQWEXVLQHVV ΖQDGGLWLRQWRRXUVWURQJIUHHFDVKȵRZJHQHUDWLRQSROLWLFDOUHYHQXHZDVDKLJKOLJKWRIRXUSHUIRUPDQFH For the year, we generated record political
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Final Baseline (Appendix I for Application Procedures PN)
    FINAL DIGITAL TELEVISION BASELINE COVERAGE AREA AND POPULATION SERVED INFORMATION RELATED TO INCENTIVE AUCTION REPACKING November 2015 Updated Final Baseline (Appendix I for Application Procedures PN) NOTE: These results are based on the 20151020UCM Database, 20151020UCM-Full.xml Scenario file, 2015Oct_132Settings.xml study template, and TVStudy version 1.3.2 (patched) NoiseLimited TerrainLimited InterferenceFree FacID FileNumber Call Ch City St Type Area Population Area Population Area Population 21488 BLCDT20110307ACV KYES-TV 5 ANCHORAGE AK DT 31,860.2 392,105 30,393.4 391,590 30,393.4 391,590 804 BMLEDT20080325ADD KAKM 8 ANCHORAGE AK DT 30,495.9 380,240 26,625.7 379,105 26,625.7 379,105 10173 BLCDT20090619ABI KTUU-TV 10 ANCHORAGE AK DT 30,495.9 380,240 26,489.7 379,047 26,489.7 379,047 13815 BLCDT20090928AKO KYUR 12 ANCHORAGE AK DT 29,535.7 379,943 25,473.6 379,027 25,473.6 379,027 35655 BLCDT20090608ABN KTBY 20 ANCHORAGE AK DT 10,074.4 348,080 9,261.0 346,562 9,261.0 346,562 49632 BLCDT20061113AAT KTVA 28 ANCHORAGE AK DT 7,551.4 342,517 7,148.6 342,300 7,148.6 342,300 25221 BLCDT20110106AAR KDMD 33 ANCHORAGE AK DT 11,792.2 374,951 10,925.9 372,727 10,925.9 372,727 787 BLDTA20121116ALD KCFT-CD 35 ANCHORAGE AK DC 6,812.4 304,868 6,373.1 284,704 6,373.1 284,704 64597 BLCDT20090129AMM KFXF 7 FAIRBANKS AK DT 15,601.3 98,156 13,296.6 97,656 13,296.6 97,656 69315 BLEDT20090929AJZ KUAC-TV 9 FAIRBANKS AK DT 24,766.1 98,717 21,801.7 98,189 21,801.7 98,189 64596 BLDVA20111128DAA K13XD-D 13 FAIRBANKS AK DC 6,852.4 97,071 6,025.5 96,844 6,025.5
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Market Research TV Households
    Broadcast Market Research TVHouseholds Everyindustryneedsameasureofthesizeofitsmarketplaceandtheradioandtelevisionindustriesare noexceptions. TELEVISION - U.S. AmajorsourceofsuchmediamarketdataintheUnitedStatesisNielsenMediaResearch(NMR),and oneofthemeasurementsittakesannuallyisTVHouseholds(TVHH).Ahomewithoneoperable TV/monitorisaTVHH,andNielsenisabletoextrapolateits“NationalUniverseEstimates”fromCensus BureaupopulationdatacombinedwiththisexpressionofTVpenetration. WithUsfromDayOne Theadventofbroadcastadvertising,inJuly1941,wascoincidentalwiththedawnofcommercial television,andwithintenyearsmarketresearchinthenewmediumwasinfullswing. SincetheFederalCommunicationsCommission(FCC)allowedthosefirstTVads—forSunOil,Lever Bros.,Procter&GambleandtheBulovaWatchCompany—reliableaudiencemeasurementhasbeen necessaryformarketerstotargettheircampaigns.TheproliferationofdevicesforviewingTVcontent andthecontinualevolutionofconsumerbehaviorhavemadethetaskmoreimportant—andmore challenging—thanever. Nevertheless,whiletherealityof“TVEverywhere”hasundeniablycomplicatedtheworkofaudience measurement,theuseofonerudimentarygaugepersists—thenumberofhouseholdswithaset,TVHH. NielsenMediaResearch IntheUnitedStates,NielsenMediaResearch(NMR)istheauthoritativesourcefortelevisionaudience measurement(TAM).BestͲknownforitsratingssystem,whichhasdeterminedthefatesofmany televisionprograms,NMRalsotracksthenumberofhouseholdsinaDesignatedMarketArea(DMA) thatownaTV. PublishedannuallybeforethestartofthenewTVseasoninSeptember,theseUniverseEstimates, representingpotentialregionalaudiences,areusedbyadvertiserstoplaneffectivecampaigns.
    [Show full text]