Review of Control Options for Suppression Or Elimination of the Yellow-Legged Asian Hornet, Vespa Velutina Nigrithorax in the UK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of Control Options for Suppression Or Elimination of the Yellow-Legged Asian Hornet, Vespa Velutina Nigrithorax in the UK Review of control options for suppression or elimination of the Yellow-legged Asian hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax in the UK. Project PH0530 Ben Jones, Kirsty Stainton and Maureen Wakefield March 2017 Contents 1. Control of invasive species .................................................................................. 3 2. Vespa velutina nigrithorax ................................................................................... 4 3. Monitoring, trapping and mechanical control ....................................................... 6 4. Chemical control of Vespa velutina nigrithorax .................................................... 7 4.1 Chemical control agents ................................................................................ 7 4.2 Formulation types available .............................................................................. 9 4.3 Pheromones ...................................................................................................... 9 4.4 Toxic baits against Vespids ............................................................................... 9 5. Biological control of Vespa velutina nigrithorax.................................................. 14 6. Novel control techniques for control of Vespa velutina nigrithorax .................... 16 6.1 Sterile Insect Technique.................................................................................. 16 6.2. RNA interference ........................................................................................... 21 6.3 Genetic transformation and Genome editing .................................................. 24 7. Conclusion and recommendations ..................................................................... 28 8. References ........................................................................................................ 31 1. Control of invasive species When a new species is introduced into an area where they are not indigenous, they may be referred to as ‘non-native’, ‘exotic’ or ‘alien’ (Manchester, 2000). Only approximately 10% of introduced species will become established in their new territory and only 0.1% will become invasive (Manchester, 2000). Invasiveness refers to the ability of a non-native species to be detrimental to the economy or ecosystem into which it has been introduced and may be used synonymously with the term ‘pest’. The chances of eradicating, or suppressing, an invasive population once it has become established in its new territory is very low. Once established a pest population can be time-consuming and costly to control (Manchester, 2000). There are 34 recorded species of introduced Vespidae around the world, the most invasive of which are eusocial, like the yellow-legged Asian hornet Vespa velutina nigrithorax (Beggs et al., 2011). Vespidae are generalist feeders with a high dispersal potential and fast reproductive rate which accounts for the success of the invasive Vespids, such as Vespula germanica and Vespula vulgaris, across North America, New Zealand and Australia (Beggs et al., 2011). Traditional control methods can be broadly characterised as physical/mechanical, chemical or biological in nature. Physical/ mechanical control may involve trapping or manual destruction of an invasive pest, through hunting for example. Chemical control may involve the use of broad spectrum insecticides. Biological control usually refers to the introduction of biological agents, such as predators, parasites or pathogens of the target species. In the past two decades, molecular techniques have also been developed and deployed for pest control; this includes genetic modification, para- transgenesis and the use of RNA interference (RNAi). This review will include an evaluation of the techniques described above and their applicability for use against the yellow-legged Asian hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax. The review will conclude with a summary of these techniques and the feasibility of using them, and a recommendation of the likely most effective techniques as well as a description of further research that may be required to improve the suite of control options available. 2. Vespa velutina nigrithorax Vespa velutina is a species of hornet native to East Asia. It belongs to the order Hymenoptera which includes bees, wasps and sawflies; hornets are closely related to wasps, which all belong to the family Vespidae (Figure 1). There are 12 subspecies of V. velutina across its native range, which can be identified by their thoracic and abdominal colourations (Perrard et al., 2014). The dark subspecies nigrithorax was discovered in southern France in 2004 after an accidental introduction and was found to originate from a hornet population from eastern China using genetic analyses (Arca et al., 2015). These analyses determined that the incursion was initiated by very few or perhaps even a single female queen hornet that had mated with multiple males (Arca et al., 2015). Despite the strong population bottleneck experienced by this invasive species and its resulting restricted genetic diversity, V. velutina nigrithorax has gone on to colonise approximately three quarters of France (Villemant and Rome, 2016), northern Spain in 2010, Portugal and Belgium in 2011, Italy in 2012 (Darrouzet et al., 2015 and Lopez, 2011), Germany in 2014 (Orlov, 2016). At the time of writing of this report (March 2017) there had been a single incursion of V. velutina nigrithorax in the UK. A nest was subsequently found and destroyed. Figure 1: Basic representation of relatedness of hornets to bees and wasps. A review of control techniques will not be complete without an introduction to the biology of V. velutina; aspects of the biology must be understood when considering the merit of each control option. Some pest control strategies involve targeting the reproductive individuals and one of the crucial differences in V. velutina biology that sets them apart from other pest insects is its sex determination system. The haplo- diploid species V. velutina has a single-locus complementary sex determination system; females are heterozygous at a sex-determining locus, while males are homozygous (diploid) or hemizygous (haploid) (Darrouzet et al., 2015). A colony of V. velutina is comprised mainly of non-reproductive female workers. The only reproductive female in the colony is the queen (although workers may be able to lay haploid eggs). Hornet nests only produce reproductive individuals in autumn, the queen will first begin by laying eggs destined to become males followed, weeks later, by female eggs destined to become the future queens or gynes. In France, males begin emerging in late August and virgin queens in early/mid-September, they mate and the females disperse (this may occur just before or just after hibernation) while the males die (Darrouzet et al., 2015). Three times as many males as virgin queens are produced by a nest (Monceau et al., 2013a). In early spring (late February onwards), mated queens emerge to find sites for nest- building (Villemant and Rome, 2015). Between 90 and 99% of V. velutina queens die of natural causes before making a nest due to over-wintering losses and fierce competition among queens for nesting sites. Even if an intervention is able to remove the majority of new queens from an environment (i.e. through trapping) the effects of density dependent competition for this species are yet to be ascertained so the effectiveness of control at this stage is unknown (Monceau and Thiéry, 2016). Vespa velutina has a long-distance dispersal potential with a rate of spread of 78 km per year in France; this is in part due to their excellent flight ability, as queens can travel up to 200 km in 10 days (Robinet et al., 2016). However, their spread is also hastened by the inadvertent transport of queens via human activity (Robinet et al., 2016). This makes prediction and prevention of novel incursions extremely difficult. Vespa velutina is a univoltine species, i.e. it has only a single generation each year. The successful queen will create her primary nest and rear her first set of brood alone; when this brood emerges they abscond from the primary nest and build a secondary nest. The secondary nest is managed by the workers and a single nest may produce up to 13,000 workers in a season, with approximately 1800 individuals present in the nest at a given time (Villemant and Rome, 2015). In France 70% of secondary nests are found above 10m and they may be found equally in urban (49%) or agricultural and forested areas (50%) (Villemant and Rome, 2015). The majority of nests will be located in trees and largely undetectable by sight. The difficulty involved in detecting nests is a significant obstacle for control. Detection methods have recently been reviewed in the Defra funded project PH0524 (Review of the potential detection and control options for nests of the Asian hornet (Vespa velutina nigrithorax)) and will not be considered further in the current review. When considering the methods for control of an organism, an understanding of the life history and reproductive biology of that organism is crucial and any attempt to control will be unsuccessful without it. This will be especially true for Vespa velutina nigrithorax, as its life cycle, reproductive strategy and biology differ somewhat from the majority of canonical ‘pest’ insects. Most pest insects belong to the orders Diptera (i.e. mosquitoes, Medfly, Screwworm), Coleoptera (i.e. Colorado potato beetle, boll weevil) and Lepidoptera (i.e. codling moth,
Recommended publications
  • B Commission Regulation (Eu)
    02010R0037 — EN — 29.09.2018 — 035.001 — 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document ►B COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 15, 20.1.2010, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EU) No 758/2010 of 24 August 2010 L 223 37 25.8.2010 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EU) No 759/2010 of 24 August 2010 L 223 39 25.8.2010 ►M3 Commission Regulation (EU) No 761/2010 of 25 August 2010 L 224 1 26.8.2010 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 890/2010 of 8 October 2010 L 266 1 9.10.2010 ►M5 Commission Regulation (EU) No 914/2010 of 12 October 2010 L 269 5 13.10.2010 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EU) No 362/2011 of 13 April 2011 L 100 26 14.4.2011 ►M7 Commission Regulation (EU) No 363/2011 of 13 April 2011 L 100 28 14.4.2011 ►M8 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2012 of 1 L 30 1 2.2.2012 February 2012 ►M9 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 85/2012 of 1 L 30 4 2.2.2012 February 2012 ►M10 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 86/2012 of 1 L 30 6 2.2.2012 February 2012 ►M11 Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Report Name:Ukraine's Mrls for Veterinary Drugs
    Voluntary Report – Voluntary - Public Distribution Date: November 05,2020 Report Number: UP2020-0051 Report Name: Ukraine's MRLs for Veterinary Drugs Country: Ukraine Post: Kyiv Report Category: FAIRS Subject Report Prepared By: Oleksandr Tarassevych Approved By: Robin Gray Report Highlights: Ukraine adopted several maximum residue levels (MRLs) for veterinary drugs, coccidiostats and histomonostats in food products of animal origin. Ukraine also adopted a list of drugs residues that are not allowed in food products. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY The Office of Agricultural Affairs of USDA/Foreign Agricultural Service in Kyiv, Ukraine prepared this report for U.S. exporters of domestic food and agricultural products. While every possible care was taken in the preparation of this report, information provided may not be completely accurate either because policies have changed since the time this report was written, or because clear and consistent information about these policies was not available. It is highly recommended U.S. exporters verify the full set of import requirements with their foreign customers, who are normally best equipped to research such matters with local authorities, before any goods are shipped. This FAIRS Subject Report accompanies other reports on Maximum, Residue Limits established by Ukraine in 2020. Related reports could be found under the following links: 1.) Ukraine's MRLs for Microbiological Contaminants_Kyiv_Ukraine_04-27-2020 2.) Ukraine's MRLs for Certain Contaminants_Kyiv_Ukraine_03-06-2020 Food Products of animal origin and/or ingredients of animal origin are not permitted in the Ukrainian market if they contain certain veterinary drugs residues in excess of the maximum residue levels established in Tables 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Effects of Chemicals Used Against Salmon Lice
    STRANDBÚNAÐUR 2018 Grand Hótel Reykjavík, 19. – 20. mars 2018 Renée Katrin Bechmann Environmental effects of chemicals used against salmon lice 21 March 2018 In aquaculture, pesticides are used against parasitic salmon lice to protect the health of farmed and wild Atlantic salmon. - How can this use of pesticides as medicine affect our coastal marine environment? Economic consequences Costs billions for the aquaculture industry Salmon lice and the war against lice Environmental concequences Animal welfare for farmed and wild salmon How to get rid of lice Risk for reduced stocks of wild salmon Kill them with chemicals Animal welfare and overfishing of cleaner fish Use cleaner fish and other non-chemical methods Risk for non-target crustaceans, and the rest of Protect the salmon from lice in (semi-)closed cages the coastal ecosystem The perfect anti-salmon lice medicine Low toxicity to: Humans High toxicity to: Salmon lice Salmon = target crustaceans Must eat the chemical or swim in a solution Fast depuration after treatment of the fish The environment including non-target crustaceans Must die! Fast degradation Low bioavailability … and not develop resistance Low toxicity kg used per year (log scale) 100000000 10000000 1000000 100000 10000 1000 100 10 1 1981 salmon lice 1981 usedChemicals against 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 - 2010 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 peroxide Hydrogen benzoate Emamectin Deltamethrin
    [Show full text]
  • Chemotherapeutants Against Salmon Lice Lepeophtheirus Salmonis – Screening of Efficacy
    Chemotherapeutants against salmon lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis – screening of efficacy Stian Mørch Aaen Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences Norwegian University of Life Sciences Adamstuen 2016 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments 5 Acronyms/terminology 7 List of papers 8 Summary 9 Sammendrag 9 1 Introduction 11 1.1 Salmon farming in an international perspective; industrial challenges 11 1.2 Salmon lice 12 1.2.1 History and geographic distribution 12 1.2.2 Salmon lice life cycle 14 1.2.3 Pathology caused by salmon lice 16 1.2.4 Salmon lice cultivation in the lab 16 1.3 Approaches to combat sea lice 17 1.3.1 Medicinal interference: antiparasitic chemotherapeutants 17 1.3.2 Resistance in sea lice against chemotherapeutants 19 1.3.3 Non-medicinal intervention: examples 22 1.3.3.1 Physical barriers 23 1.3.3.2 Optical and acoustic control measures 23 1.3.3.3 Functional feeds, vaccine, breeding 24 1.3.3.4 Biological de-lousing: cleaner fish and freshwater 24 1.3.3.5 Physical removal 24 1.3.3.6 Fallowing and geographical zones 25 1.4 Rationale 25 2 Aims 26 3 Materials and methods 26 3.1 Materials 26 3.1.1 Salmon lice 26 3.1.2 Fish – Atlantic salmon 26 3.1.3 Water 27 3.1.3 Medicinal compounds 27 3.1.4 Dissolvents 29 3.2 Methods 29 3.2.1 Hatching assays with egg strings 29 3.2.2 Survival assays with nauplii 29 3.2.3 Bioassays with preadults 30 3.2.4 Statistical analysis 31 4 Summary of papers, I-IV 32 5 Discussion 35 5.1 Novel methods for medicine screening 35 5.2 Industrial innovation in aquaculture and pharmaceutical companies 35 5.3 Administration routes of medicinal compounds to fish 36 5.4 Mixing and bioavailability of medicinal products in seawater 37 5.5 Biochemical targets in L.
    [Show full text]
  • Flower-Visiting by the Invasive Hornet Vespa Velutina Nigrithorax (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)
    International Journal of Chemical, Environmental & Biological Sciences (IJCEBS) Volume 3, Issue 6 (2015) ISSN 2320–4087 (Online) Flower-Visiting by the Invasive Hornet Vespa Velutina Nigrithorax (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) Takatoshi Ueno1 subspecies on the basis of the external morphology, i.e., color Abstract—The Asian hornet or yellow-legged hornet Vespa and marking patterns [8]; the subspecies nigrithorax is natively velutina nigrithorax has recently been recorded as an invasive insect distributed in southern China and northern India. However, in evoking environmental, apicultural and medical problems. Many 2000’s, this subspecies was unintentionally introduced into aspects of the ecology, behavior and life history remain unknown, Europe and Korea, where it has been increasing the populations however. The present study focuses on flower-visiting by the hornet in and expanding the range [9—11]. More recently, V. velutina the field. The foraging behavior of V. velutina nigrithorax on and nigrithorax has been found established in Tsushima Island of around blooming plants was observed in Tsushima Island, Japan and Busan City, South Korea. The field observations confirmed that the Japan in 2013 [12, 13]. Further, a nest of this hornet was hornet fed on floral nectar of 27 plant species scattering among 15 discovered in Kitakyushu City, mainland Japan in 2015 [14]. families. Pollen feeding was not observed. In addition, it was Thus, the hornet has been extending its range in East Asia. frequently found that V. velutina nigrithorax flew and hovered around Vespa velutina nigrithorax is recognized as an invasive a patch of flowers to predate hymenopteran bees and dipteran flies. species [10, 11].
    [Show full text]
  • Aliens: the Invasive Species Bulletin Newsletter of the IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group
    Aliens: The Invasive Species Bulletin Newsletter of the IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group ISSN 1173-5988 Issue Number 31, 2011 Coordinator CONTENTS Piero Genovesi, ISSG Chair, ISPRA Editors Editorial pg. 1 Piero Genovesi and Riccardo Scalera News from the ISSG pg. 2 Assistant Editor ...And other news pg. 4 Anna Alonzi Monitoring and control modalities of a honeybee predator, the Yellow Front Cover Photo legged hornet Vespa velutina The yellow-legged hornet Vespa velutina nigrithorax (Hymenoptera: © Photo by Quentin Rome Vespidae) pg. 7 Improving ant eradications: details of more successes, The following people a global synthesis contributed to this issue and recommendations pg. 16 Shyama Pagad, Carola Warner Introduced reindeer on South Georgia – their impact and management pg. 24 Invasive plant species The newsletter is produced twice a year and in Asian elephant habitats pg. 30 is available in English. To be added to the AlterIAS: a LIFE+ project to curb mailing list, or to download the electronic the introduction of invasive version, visit: ornamental plants in Belgium pg. 36 www.issg.org/newsletter.html#Aliens Investigation of Invasive plant Please direct all submissions and other ed- species in the Caucasus: itorial correspondence to Riccardo Scalera current situation pg. 42 [email protected] The annual cost of invasive species to the British economy quantified pg. 47 Published by Eradication of the non-native ISPRA - Rome, Italy sea squirt Didemnum vexillum Graphics design from Holyhead Harbour, Wales, UK pg. 52 Franco Iozzoli, ISPRA Challenges, needs and future steps Coordination for managing invasive alien species Daria Mazzella, ISPRA - Publishing Section in the Western Balkan Region pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Accreditation No: 15028
    SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION - No. 15028 Page 1 of 4 ACCREDITATION NO: 15028 Eurofins Agroscience Testing Pty Ltd Chemical Testing Laboratory Unit F6, Building F 16 Mars Road LANE COVE NSW 2066 CONTACT: Ms K Ford PHONE: (02) 9900 8442 FAX: MOBILE: 0421 609 757 EMAIL: [email protected] WEB SITE: www.eurofins.com.au FACILITIES: Public testing service This facility complies with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005 7.37 Plastics .11 Chemical analyses Analysis of polyethylene products listed as determination(s) by technique(s) using method(s) - Bifenthrin by GC using in-house AATM-P94 7.52 Residues and contaminants in foods and agricultural materials .02 Pesticides Analysis of animal feeds, animal tissues (fat, kidney, liver, muscle), cereals, fruit, grains, juices/juice concentrate, pasture, pulses, oil seeds, vegetables listed as determination(s) by technique(s) using method(s) - Fungicides: Azoxystrobin; benalaxyl; benomyl; bitertanol; boscalid; bupirimate; carbendazim; carboxin; cyproconazole; difenoconazole; dimethomorph; epoxiconazole; fenarimol; fenbuconazole; fenhexamid; fenpyroximate; fludioxinil; fluquinconazole; flusilazole; flutriafol; hexaconazole; imazilil; ipconazole; iprodione; kresoxim-methyl; mancozeb; maneb; metalaxyl; metiram; myclobutanil; oxadixyl; penconazole; procymidone; propiconazole; propineb; pyraclostrobin; tebuconazole; tetraconazole; thiabendazole; thiram; triadimefon; triadimenol; tridemorph; trifloxystrobin; vinclozolin; zineb; ziram Herbicides: Ametryn; atrazine; carfentrazone ethyl; clethodim; clomazone; clopyralid;
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors
    sensors Review Recent Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors Nurul Illya Muhamad Fauzi 1, Yap Wing Fen 1,2,*, Nur Alia Sheh Omar 1,2 and Hazwani Suhaila Hashim 2 1 Functional Devices Laboratory, Institute of Advanced Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (N.I.M.F.); [email protected] (N.A.S.O.) 2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Insecticides are enormously important to industry requirements and market demands in agriculture. Despite their usefulness, these insecticides can pose a dangerous risk to the safety of food, environment and all living things through various mechanisms of action. Concern about the environmental impact of repeated use of insecticides has prompted many researchers to develop rapid, economical, uncomplicated and user-friendly analytical method for the detection of insecticides. In this regards, optical sensors are considered as favorable methods for insecticides analysis because of their special features including rapid detection time, low cost, easy to use and high selectivity and sensitivity. In this review, current progresses of incorporation between recognition elements and optical sensors for insecticide detection are discussed and evaluated well, by categorizing it based on insecticide chemical classes, including the range of detection and limit of detection. Additionally, this review aims to provide powerful insights to researchers for the future development of optical sensors in the detection of insecticides. Citation: Fauzi, N.I.M.; Fen, Y.W.; Omar, N.A.S.; Hashim, H.S. Recent Keywords: insecticides; optical sensor; recognition element Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Secondary Nest of the Yellow-Legged Hornet Found in the Balearic Islands Reveals Its High Adaptability to Mediterranean Isolated Ecosystems
    C. Herrera, A. Marqués, V. Colomar and M.M. Leza Herrera, C.; A. Marqués, V. Colomar and M.M. Leza. Analysis of the secondary nest of the yellow-legged hornet found in the Balearic Islands reveals its high adaptability to Mediterranean isolated ecosystems Analysis of the secondary nest of the yellow-legged hornet found in the Balearic Islands reveals its high adaptability to Mediterranean isolated ecosystems C. Herrera1, A. Marqués1, V. Colomar2 and M.M. Leza1 1Laboratory of Zoology, Department of Biology, University of the Balearic Islands, Cra. Valldemossa km 7.5, CP: 07122 Palma, Illes Balears, Spain. <[email protected]>. 2Consortium for the Recovery of the Fauna of the Balearic Islands (COFIB), Crta. Sineu km 15, CP: 07142 Santa Eugènia, Illes Balears, Spain. Abstract The yellow-legged hornet (Vespa velutina) was detected for the fi rst time in the north of Spain in 2010, but was not detected in Majorca, Balearic Islands until 2015 and only one secondary nest, with 10 combs, was found in the northwest of the island. During 2016, nine more nests were found in the same region. To better understand the biology of V. velutina in isolated conditions, the following objectives were proposed: (I) describe the architecture and structure of nests; (II) analyse the shape of combs and develop a new method to confi rm the circular pattern of breeding; (III) determine the colony size and (IV) determine the succession of workers and sexual individuals throughout the season. For these reasons, nests that were removed were frozen for at least 48 days until analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Potential Environmental Risks Associated with the Use Of
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2013/050 National Capital Region A review of potential environmental risks associated with the use of pesticides to treat Atlantic salmon against infestations of sea lice in southwest New Brunswick, Canada Dr. Les Burridge Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. Andrews Biological Station, 531 Brandy Cove Road, St. Andrews, NB, E5B 2L9 August 2013 Foreword This series documents the scientific basis for the evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time frames required and the documents it contains are not intended as definitive statements on the subjects addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing investigations. Research documents are produced in the official language in which they are provided to the Secretariat. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2013 ISSN 1919-5044 Correct citation for this publication: Burridge, L. 2013. A review of potential environmental risks associated with the use of pesticides to treat Atlantic salmon against infestations of sea lice in southwest New Brunswick, Canada. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2013/050. iv + 25 p. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... III RÉSUMÉ .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 Theinternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Was Established in 1980
    The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 cation Hazard of Pesticides by and Guidelines to Classi The WHO Recommended Classi The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 TheInternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) was established in 1980. The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. This publication was developed in the IOMC context. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or stated policies of individual IOMC Participating Organizations. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase international coordination in the field of chemical safety. The Participating Organizations are: FAO, ILO, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, UNITAR, WHO, World Bank and OECD. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, 2019 edition ISBN 978-92-4-000566-2 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-000567-9 (print version) ISSN 1684-1042 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Sea Lice Agents in Norwegian Aquaculture
    Anti-sea lice agents in Norwegian aquaculture surveillance, treatment trends and possible implications for food safety Hannisdal, Rita; Nøstbakken, Ole Jakob; Hove, Helge; Madsen, Lise; Horsberg, Tor Einar; Lunestad, Bjørn Tore Published in: Aquaculture DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735044 Publication date: 2020 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Hannisdal, R., Nøstbakken, O. J., Hove, H., Madsen, L., Horsberg, T. E., & Lunestad, B. T. (2020). Anti-sea lice agents in Norwegian aquaculture: surveillance, treatment trends and possible implications for food safety. Aquaculture, 521, [735044]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735044 Download date: 09. apr.. 2020 Aquaculture 521 (2020) 735044 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquaculture journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquaculture Anti-sea lice agents in Norwegian aquaculture; surveillance, treatment T trends and possible implications for food safety ⁎ Rita Hannisdala, , Ole Jakob Nøstbakkena, Helge Hovea, Lise Madsena,c, Tor Einar Horsbergb, Bjørn Tore Lunestada a Institute of Marine Research (IMR), Bergen, Norway. b Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Norway. c Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Sea lice are a major challenge for the Norwegian aquaculture, and to cope with sea lice infections, several Aquaculture physical, biological and chemical treatments are applied. This study presents data on the use of anti-sea lice Salmon agents for Norwegian farmed fish from 1992 to 2017, and results from the surveillance of residues of suchagents Surveillance in samples collected from 2002 to 2017. In the period 2002–2007 the use of anti-sea lice agents included Veterinary drug emamectin, cypermethrin and deltamethrin.
    [Show full text]