DOCSLIB.ORG

On the State of Sublithospheric Upper Mantle Beneath a Supercontinent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the State of Sublithospheric Upper Mantle Beneath a Supercontinent Geophys. J. Int. (2002) 149, 179–189 On the state of sublithospheric upper mantle beneath a supercontinent Jun Korenaga1,∗ and Thomas H. Jordan2 1Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA Accepted 2001 October 25. Received 2001 October 17; in original form 2000 November 5 SUMMARY An assumption of isothermal and static asthenosphere as the normal state of sublithospheric mantle, as commonly employed in studies of terrestrial magmatism, may be physically im- plausible for a system cooled from above. The growth of an unstable thermal boundary layer at the base of the lithosphere can lead to small-scale convection, so asthenosphere is expected to be usually convecting. A first-order estimate based on the energetics of convection sug- gests that mantle upwelling rate associated with such small-scale convection is on the order of 10 cm yr−1 for asthenospheric viscosity of 1018–1019 Pa s. To investigate the potential role of such sublithospheric convection in anomalous magmatism associated with rifting of the super- continent Pangaea, a simple upper-mantle convection problem with thick cratonic lithosphere is considered through finite element modelling. Strong three dimensionality is exhibited in our solutions, and the planform of convection is largely affected by the bottom topography of con- tinental lithosphere. Our model also suggests that differential cooling, imposed by a variation in lithospheric lid thickness, may lead to large-scale convection, which brings uncooled, ‘hot’ material from the base of thick lithosphere to shallow asthenosphere. The potential importance of such sublithospheric convection in magmatism during continental rifting is discussed. Key words: continental margins, hotspots, mantle convection, upper mantle. necking can result in vigorous, small-scale mantle convection, which 1 INTRODUCTION may account for the observed voluminous rifting magmatism. As Continental rifting during the dispersal of the supercontinent Keen & Boutilier (1995) showed, however, such sharp necking is Pangaea was often accompanied by massive magmatism as evi- unlikely in the deformation of ductile mantle. Intense lithospheric denced by the frequent occurrence of flood basalts and thick ig- necking is fundamental for this type of mechanism, as is assumed neous crust emplaced along a number of rifted margins (White & a priori even in the most recent efforts for this type of modelling McKenzie 1989; Holbrook & Kelemen 1993; Coffin & Eldholm (Boutilier & Keen 1999; Keen & Boutilier 2000). 1994). The thickness of igneous crust formed at such volcanic rifted Both types of explanations, i.e. plume models and necking mod- margins is typically 20–30 km (White et al. 1987; Mutter & Zehnder els, implicitly assume that the ‘normal’ state of asthenospheric man- 1988; Holbrook et al. 1994). Because normal oceanic crust, which tle is isothermal and thus static. Anything that cannot be explained most likely results from decompressional melting of passively up- by the passive upwelling of mantle with normal potential tempera- welling mantle with normal potential temperature (∼1300◦C) (Klein ture, therefore, seems to require some special mechanism. Even if & Langmuir 1987; McKenzie & Bickle 1988; Kinzler & Grove asthenospheric mantle was indeed isothermal at some time, however, 1992), is only 6–7 km thick (e.g. White et al. 1992), the voluminous cooling from above results in the growth of a thermal boundary layer, magmatism implied by several times thicker igneous crust formed which may eventually become unstable and lead to sublithospheric, during rifting has been commonly attributed to the upwelling of small-scale convection (Foster 1965; Parsons & McKenzie 1978; unusually hot mantle originating in a large plume head (White & Buck & Parmentier 1986; Davaille & Jaupart 1994), after which McKenzie 1989; Richards et al. 1989; Hill et al. 1992). On the other the resultant thermal structure is no longer isothermal. Static and hand, continents seem to rift at pre-existing weak zones such as cra- isothermal asthenosphere, therefore, seems to be a rather extreme tonic edges (Wilson 1966; Anderson 1994). Mutter et al. (1988) pro- case, despite the fact that it is commonly assumed to be normal in posed that a sharp lateral thermal gradient produced by lithospheric studies of terrestrial magmatism. If asthenospheric mantle is usu- ally convecting, then, how does this affect our inferences regarding ∗Now at Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of mantle dynamics based on the products of melting? The impor- California, Berkeley, USA. tance of small-scale convection may be significant, particularly for C 2002 RAS 179 180 J. Korenaga and T. H. Jordan magmatism during continental rifting. Unlike mid-ocean ridge mag- Using values appropriate for the shallow upper mantle, i.e. −5 3 3 −6 2 −1 matism, which may be adequately modelled with steady-state, pas- α = 3 × 10 , ρ0 = 3.3 × 10 kg m , κ = 10 m s , k = sive mantle upwelling driven by large-scale plate motion (e.g. 3.3Wm−1 K−1, and g = 9.8ms−2, the velocity scale expected for McKenzie & Bickle 1988), continental rifting is essentially a tran- small-scale convection with a depth extent of 150 km is calculated as sient process, in which an initially null surface divergence evolves a function of asthenospheric viscosity, for several values of surface into finite-rate spreading. The dynamic aspect of pre-existing sub- heat flux (Fig. 1a). With the above thermal conductivity and a tem- lithospheric convection may be important in calculating the amount perature difference of 1300 K across the rigid lithosphere, heat fluxes of melt generated during rifting, because, when the convective up- of 40–10 mW m−2 approximately correspond to lithospheric thick- welling rate exceeds the surface divergence rate, this can produce nesses of 100–400 km, respectively. The viscosity of the astheno- ‘excess’ magmatism due to rapid mantle fluxing through the melting sphere is probably in a range of 1018–1019 Pa s, based on laboratory zone. This type of active mantle upwelling has been proposed to be studies (Karato & Wu 1993; Hirth & Kohlstedt 1996) and geophysi- important in recent studies on continental rifting magmatism (e.g. cal observations (Pasay 1981; Weins& Stein 1985; Hager & Clayton Kelemen & Holbrook 1995; Korenaga et al. 2000). 1989). Though the depth extent of this weak asthenosphere is not The rheology of the Earth’s mantle is characterized by strongly well-known, mantle viscosity is expected to increase with depth be- temperature-dependent viscosity. Because most of the tempera- cause of its non-zero activation volume (e.g. Karato & Wu 1993). ture variation occurs in nearly rigid lithosphere, the energetics of Indeed, the mantle transition zone (400–670 km) seems to have a small-scale convection beneath lithosphere (or stagnant-lid convec- higher viscosity, of 1020–1021 Pa s, and a further increase in viscos- tion) can be approximated by that of isoviscous convection (e.g. ity is also indicated for the lower mantle (Hager et al. 1985; Hager Solomatov 1995). Based on the boundary layer theory (e.g. Turcotte & Schubert 1982), the velocity scale of such small-scale convection, U, can be expressed as a function of surface heat flux, q, as (Korenaga 2000) αρ gκ D2q U ∼ 0 , (1) 8µk where α is thermal expansivity, ρ0 is a fluid density at some refer- ence temperature, g is gravitational acceleration, κ is the thermal diffusivity, D is the depth extent of convection, µ is fluid viscosity and k is the thermal conductivity. Cellular convection with a unit aspect ratio is assumed in deriving the above scaling law. In this case, the temperature difference across the thermal boundary layer, T , is related to the surface heat flux as q 1/4 3/4 8κµ q Tq ∼ . (2) αρ0g k The thickness of the stagnant lid controls heat flux at the top of the convecting domain. Thicker lithosphere can transfer less heat, so the strength of sublithospheric convection is reduced with increasing lid thickness. Eq. (1) is only conditionally applicable to stagnant-lid convec- tion, because the generation of negative buoyancy for small-scale convection is constrained by temperature-dependent viscosity. The thickness of the cold thermal boundary layer that can participate in convection is limited by a viscosity ratio corresponding to the tem- perature drop across the unstable boundary layer, and the viscosity ratio is about 3 for marginally stable convection and can be as high as 10 for fully developed convection (Davaille & Jaupart 1993). The temperature dependency of mantle rheology can be modelled by the following Arrhenius law (e.g. Weertman 1970), E E µ(T ) = µ0 exp − (3) RT RT0 where E is activation energy, R is the universal gas constant and µ0 is reference viscosity at temperature T0, for which we use the interior temperature of the convecting domain. Denoting p = log(µmax/µ0), where µmax is the highest viscosity in the unstable boundary layer, Figure 1. (a) Velocity scale of isoviscous convection subject to a given the maximum temperature drop allowed in the boundary layer may surface heat flux (eq. 1) is plotted as a function of viscosity. The depth be expressed as, scale of convection is set as 150 km. (b) Temperature drop across cold pRT2 thermal boundary layer (eq. 2) is compared with the maximum temperature T ∼− 0 (4) drop imposed by temperature-dependent viscosity (straight lines, eq. 4). The p E reference temperature T0 is set as 1573 K. Cases for two values of activation −1 when Tp T0. The velocity scale derived for isoviscous convec- energy (200 and 400 kJ mol ) and the logarithmic viscosity contrast of 1.0 tion (1) can be applied to stagnant-lid convection, if Tq < |Tp|. (corresponding to the viscosity contrasts of 3) are illustrated. C 2002 RAS, GJI, 149, 179–189 Sublithospheric mantle convection 181 & Clayton 1989; Simons & Hager 1997; Forte & Mitrovica 1996).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mantle Transition Zone Structure Beneath Northeast Asia from 2-D
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Mantle Transition Zone Structure Beneath Northeast 10.1029/2018JB016642 Asia From 2‐D Triplicated Waveform Modeling: Key Points: • The 2‐D triplicated waveform Implication for a Segmented Stagnant Slab fi ‐ modeling reveals ne scale velocity Yujing Lai1,2 , Ling Chen1,2,3 , Tao Wang4 , and Zhongwen Zhan5 structure of the Pacific stagnant slab • High V /V ratios imply a hydrous p s 1State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and/or carbonated MTZ beneath 2 3 Northeast Asia Beijing, China, College of Earth Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, CAS Center for • A low‐velocity gap is detected within Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing, China, 4Institute of Geophysics and Geodynamics, School of Earth the stagnant slab, probably Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, 5Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of suggesting a deep origin of the Technology, Pasadena, California, USA Changbaishan intraplate volcanism Supporting Information: Abstract The structure of the mantle transition zone (MTZ) in subduction zones is essential for • Supporting Information S1 understanding subduction dynamics in the deep mantle and its surface responses. We constructed the P (Vp) and SH velocity (Vs) structure images of the MTZ beneath Northeast Asia based on two‐dimensional ‐ Correspondence to: (2 D) triplicated waveform modeling. In the upper MTZ, a normal Vp but 2.5% low Vs layer compared with L. Chen and T. Wang, IASP91 are required by the triplication data. In the lower MTZ, our results show a relatively higher‐velocity [email protected]; layer (+2% V and −0.5% V compared to IASP91) with a thickness of ~140 km and length of ~1,200 km [email protected] p s atop the 660‐km discontinuity.
    [Show full text]
  • STRUCTURE of EARTH S-Wave Shadow P-Wave Shadow P-Wave
    STRUCTURE OF EARTH Earthquake Focus P-wave P-wave shadow shadow S-wave shadow P waves = Primary waves = Pressure waves S waves = Secondary waves = Shear waves (Don't penetrate liquids) CRUST < 50-70 km thick MANTLE = 2900 km thick OUTER CORE (Liquid) = 3200 km thick INNER CORE (Solid) = 1300 km radius. STRUCTURE OF EARTH Low Velocity Crust Zone Whole Mantle Convection Lithosphere Upper Mantle Transition Zone Layered Mantle Convection Lower Mantle S-wave P-wave CRUST : Conrad discontinuity = upper / lower crust boundary Mohorovicic discontinuity = base of Continental Crust (35-50 km continents; 6-8 km oceans) MANTLE: Lithosphere = Rigid Mantle < 100 km depth Asthenosphere = Plastic Mantle > 150 km depth Low Velocity Zone = Partially Melted, 100-150 km depth Upper Mantle < 410 km Transition Zone = 400-600 km --> Velocity increases rapidly Lower Mantle = 600 - 2900 km Outer Core (Liquid) 2900-5100 km Inner Core (Solid) 5100-6400 km Center = 6400 km UPPER MANTLE AND MAGMA GENERATION A. Composition of Earth Density of the Bulk Earth (Uncompressed) = 5.45 gm/cm3 Densities of Common Rocks: Granite = 2.55 gm/cm3 Peridotite, Eclogite = 3.2 to 3.4 gm/cm3 Basalt = 2.85 gm/cm3 Density of the CORE (estimated) = 7.2 gm/cm3 Fe-metal = 8.0 gm/cm3, Ni-metal = 8.5 gm/cm3 EARTH must contain a mix of Rock and Metal . Stony meteorites Remains of broken planets Planetary Interior Rock=Stony Meteorites ÒChondritesÓ = Olivine, Pyroxene, Metal (Fe-Ni) Metal = Fe-Ni Meteorites Core density = 7.2 gm/cm3 -- Too Light for Pure Fe-Ni Light elements = O2 (FeO) or S (FeS) B.
    [Show full text]
  • Continental Flood Basalts Derived from the Hydrous Mantle Transition Zone
    ARTICLE Received 4 Sep 2014 | Accepted 1 Jun 2015 | Published 14 Jul 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8700 Continental flood basalts derived from the hydrous mantle transition zone Xuan-Ce Wang1, Simon A. Wilde1, Qiu-Li Li2 & Ya-Nan Yang2 It has previously been postulated that the Earth’s hydrous mantle transition zone may play a key role in intraplate magmatism, but no confirmatory evidence has been reported. Here we demonstrate that hydrothermally altered subducted oceanic crust was involved in generating the late Cenozoic Chifeng continental flood basalts of East Asia. This study combines oxygen isotopes with conventional geochemistry to provide evidence for an origin in the hydrous mantle transition zone. These observations lead us to propose an alternative thermochemical model, whereby slab-triggered wet upwelling produces large volumes of melt that may rise from the hydrous mantle transition zone. This model explains the lack of pre-magmatic lithospheric extension or a hotspot track and also the arc-like signatures observed in some large-scale intracontinental magmas. Deep-Earth water cycling, linked to cold subduction, slab stagnation, wet mantle upwelling and assembly/breakup of supercontinents, can potentially account for the chemical diversity of many continental flood basalts. 1 ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems (CCFS), The Institute for Geoscience Research (TIGeR), Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia. 2 State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box9825, Beijing 100029, China. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to X.-C.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Earth
    TheThe Earth’sEarth’s StructureStructure fromfrom TravelTravel TimesTimes SphericallySpherically symmetricsymmetric structure:structure: PREMPREM --CCrustalrustal StructuStructurree --UUpperpper MantleMantle structustructurree PhasePhase transitiotransitionnss AnisotropyAnisotropy --LLowerower MantleMantle StructureStructure D”D” --SStructuretructure ofof thethe OuterOuter andand InnerInner CoreCore 3-3-DD StStructureructure ofof thethe MantleMantle fromfrom SeismicSeismic TomoTomoggrraphyaphy --UUpperpper mantlemantle -M-Miidd mmaannttllee -L-Loowweerr MMaannttllee Seismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior The Earth’s Structure SphericallySpherically SymmetricSymmetric StructureStructure ParametersParameters wwhhichich cancan bebe determineddetermined forfor aa referencereferencemodelmodel -P-P--wwaavvee v veeloloccitityy -S-S--wwaavvee v veeloloccitityy -D-Deennssitityy -A-Atttteennuuaattioionn ( (QQ)) --AAnisonisotropictropic parame parametersters -Bulk modulus K -Bulk modulus Kss --rrigidityigidity µ µ −−prepresssuresure - -ggravityravity Seismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior The Earth’s Structure PREM:PREM: velocitiesvelocities andand densitydensity PREMPREM:: PPreliminaryreliminary RReferenceeference EEartharth MMooddelel (Dziewonski(Dziewonski andand Anderson,Anderson, 1981)1981) Seismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior The Earth’s Structure PREM:PREM: AttenuationAttenuation PREMPREM:: PPreliminaryreliminary RReferenceeference EEartharth MMooddelel (Dziewonski(Dziewonski andand Anderson,Anderson, 1981)1981) Seismology and the
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone
    The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone Daniel J. Frost* DOI: 10.2113/GSELEMENTS.4.3.171 he upper mantle is the source of almost all magmas. It contains major body wave velocity structure, such as PREM (preliminary reference transitions in rheological and thermal behaviour that control the character Earth model) (e.g. Dziewonski and Tof plate tectonics and the style of mantle dynamics. Essential parameters Anderson 1981). in any model to describe these phenomena are the mantle’s compositional The transition zone, between 410 and thermal structure. Most samples of the mantle come from the lithosphere. and 660 km, is an excellent region Although the composition of the underlying asthenospheric mantle can be to perform such a comparison estimated, this is made difficult by the fact that this part of the mantle partially because it is free of the complex thermal and chemical structure melts and differentiates before samples ever reach the surface. The composition imparted on the shallow mantle by and conditions in the mantle at depths significantly below the lithosphere must the lithosphere and melting be interpreted from geophysical observations combined with experimental processes. It contains a number of seismic discontinuities—sharp jumps data on mineral and rock properties. Fortunately, the transition zone, which in seismic velocity, that are gener- extends from approximately 410 to 660 km, has a number of characteristic ally accepted to arise from mineral globally observed seismic properties that should ultimately place essential phase transformations (Agee 1998). These discontinuities have certain constraints on the compositional and thermal state of the mantle. features that correlate directly with characteristics of the mineral trans- KEYWORDS: seismic discontinuity, phase transformation, pyrolite, wadsleyite, ringwoodite formations, such as the proportions of the transforming minerals and the temperature at the discontinu- INTRODUCTION ity.
    [Show full text]
  • Label and Describe the Earth Diagram
    Name_________________________class______ Label and Describe the Earth Diagram Read the definitions then use the information to color code, label and describe IN YOUR OWN WORDS each section of the diagram below. Definitions: crust – (green) the rigid, rocky outer surface of the Earth, composed mostly of basalt and granite. The crust is the thinnest of all layers. It is thicker on continents & thinner under the oceans. inner core – (gray) the solid iron-nickel center of the Earth that is very hot and under great pressure. mantle – (orange) a rocky layer located under the crust - it is composed of silicon, oxygen, magnesium, iron, aluminum, and calcium. Convection (heat) currents carry heat from the hot inner mantle to the cooler outer mantle. outer core – (red) the molten iron-nickel layer that surrounds the inner core. ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________ Name_________________________________cLass________ Label the OUTER LAYERS of the Earth This is a cross section of only the upper layers of the Earth’s surface. Read the definitions below and use the information to locate label and describe IN TWO WORDS the outer layers of the Earth. One has been done for you. continental crust – thick, top Continental Crust – (green) the thick parts of the Earth's crust, not located under the ocean; makes up the comtinents. Oceanic Crust – (brown) thinner more dense parts of the Earth's crust located under the oceans. Ocean – (blue) large bodies of water sitting atop oceanic crust. Lithosphere– (outline in black) made of BOTH the crust plus the rigid upper part of the upper mantle.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithospheric Strength Profiles
    21 LITHOSPHERIC STRENGTH PROFILES To study the mechanical response of the lithosphere to various types of forces, one has to take into account its rheology, which means knowing how it flows. As a scientific discipline, rheology describes the interactions between strain, stress and time. Strain and stress depend on the thermal structure, the fluid content, the thickness of compositional layers and various boundary conditions. The amount of time during which the load is applied is an important factor. - At the time scale of seismic waves, up to hundreds of seconds, the sub-crustal mantle behaves elastically down deep within the asthenosphere. - Over a few to thousands of years (e.g. load of ice cap), the mantle flows like a viscous fluid. - On long geological times (more than 1 million years), the upper crust and the upper mantle behave also as thin elastic and plastic plates that overlie an inviscid (i.e. with no viscosity) substratum. The dimensionless Deborah number D, summarized as natural response time/experimental observation time, is a measure of the influence of time on flow properties. Elasticity, plastic yielding, and viscous creep are therefore ingredients of the mechanical behavior of Earth materials. Each of these three modes will be considered in assessing flow processes in the lithosphere; these mechanical attributes are expressed in terms of lithospheric strength. This strength is estimated by integrating yield stress with depth. The current state of knowledge of rock rheology is sufficient to provide broad general outlines of mechanical behavior but also has important limitations. Two very thorny problems involve the scaling of rock properties with long periods and for very large length scales.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lower Mantle and Core
    Theory of the Earth Don L. Anderson Chapter 4. The Lower Mantle and Core Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, c1989 Copyright transferred to the author September 2, 1998. You are granted permission for individual, educational, research and noncommercial reproduction, distribution, display and performance of this work in any format. Recommended citation: Anderson, Don L. Theory of the Earth. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK:1989.001 A scanned image of the entire book may be found at the following persistent URL: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBook:1989.001 Abstract: The lower mantle starts just below the major mantle discontinuity near 650 km. The depth of this discontinuity varies, perhaps by as much as 100 km and is variously referred to as the "650-km discontinuity" or "670-km discontinuity." In recent Earth models there is a region of high velocity gradient for another 50 to 100 km below the discontinuity. This is probably due to phase changes, but it could represent a chemical gradient. The "lower mantle proper" therefore does not start until a depth of about 750 or 800 km. Below this depth the lower mantle is relatively homogeneous until about 300 km above the core-mantle boundary. If there is a chemical difference between the upper and lower mantle then, in a convecting dynamic mantle, the boundary will not be at a fixed depth. This clarification is needed because of the controversy about whether slabs penetrate into the lower mantle or whether they just push down the discontinuity. core. The Lower Mantle and Core I must be getting somewhere near the centre of the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantle Discontinuities
    REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, SUPPLEMENT, PAGES 783-793, APRIL 1991 U.S. NATIONAL REPORT TO INTERNATIONAL UNION OF GEODESY AND GEOPHYSICS 1987-1990 Mantle Discontinuities CRAIG R. BINA Dept. of Geological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evamton, Illinois INTRODUCT?ON mantle discontinuities which have taken place during the period 1987-1990, as well as briefly discussing some The nature of the discontinuities evident in seismic implications for mantle thermal structure and dynamics. velocity profiles of the Earth's mantle has been a topic of While I have endeavored to compile as complete a refer- active research since the work of Birch in the 1950s. ence list as possible, the lesser number of references 'The chemical, mineralogical, and thermal properties of directly discussed in the text necessarily reflects my own these features have important implications outside the interests and familiarity with the literature. I conclude by fields of seismology and mineral physics, constraining as outlining the picture of mantle structure and composition they do the overall dynamics of the Earth's interior, the which is emerging from these efforts while indicating the deep return flow for plate tectonics, and the geochemical remaining major uncertainties. signatures of source regions of igneous rocks. In the period 1987-1990, great strides have been made in identifying and characterizing mantle discontinuities from a seismological standpoint. Advances in detailed The seismological characterization of mantle discon- observation of reflected and converted
    [Show full text]
  • Whole-Mantle Convection and the Transition-Zone Water Filter
    hypothesis Whole-mantle convection and the transition-zone water filter David Bercovici & Shun-ichiro Karato Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, PO Box 208109, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8109, USA ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Because of their distinct chemical signatures, ocean-island and mid-ocean-ridge basalts are traditionally inferred to arise from separate, isolated reservoirs in the Earth’s mantle. Such mantle reservoir models, however, typically satisfy geochemical constraints, but not geophysical observations. Here we propose an alternative hypothesis that, rather than being divided into isolated reservoirs, the mantle is filtered at the 410-km-deep discontinuity. We propose that, as the ascending ambient mantle (forced up by the downward flux of subducting slabs) rises out of the high-water-solubility transition zone (between the 660 km and 410 km discontinuities) into the low-solubility upper mantle above 410 km, it undergoes dehydration-induced partial melting that filters out incompatible elements. The filtered, dry and depleted solid phase continues to rise to become the source material for mid-ocean-ridge basalts. The wet, enriched melt residue may be denser than the surrounding solid and accordingly trapped at the 410 km boundary until slab entrainment returns it to the deeper mantle. The filter could be suppressed for
    [Show full text]
  • Meibom, a and Anderson, D. L. (2003) the Statistical Upper Mantle
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com R Earth and Planetary Science Letters 217 (2003) 123^139 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl The statistical upper mantle assemblage Anders Meibom a;Ã, Don L. Anderson b a Geological and Environmental Sciences, 320 Lomita Mall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA b Seismological Laboratory 252-21, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Received 19 June 2003; received in revised form 19 September 2003; accepted 9 October 2003 Dedicated to W. Jason Morgan, for his brilliant contributions to Earth Sciences. Abstract A fundamental challenge in modern mantle geochemistry is to link geochemical data with geological and geophysical observations. Most of the early geochemical models involved a layered mantle and the concept of geochemical reservoirs. Indeed, the two layer mantle model has been implicit in almost all geochemical literature and the provenance of oceanic island basalt (OIB) and mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) [van Keken et al., Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 30 (2002) 493^525]. Large-scale regions in the mantle, such as the ‘convective’ (i.e. well-stirred, homogeneous) upper mantle, sub-continental lithosphere, and the lower mantle were treated as distinct and accessible geochemical reservoirs. Here we discuss evidence for a ubiquitous distribution of small- to moderate-scale (i.e. 102^105 m) heterogeneity in the upper mantle, which we refer to as the statistical upper mantle assemblage (SUMA). This heterogeneity forms as the result of long-term plate tectonic recycling of sedimentary and crustal components. The SUMA model does not require a convectively homogenized MORB mantle reservoir, which has become a frequently used concept in geochemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mohorovicic Discontinuity Beneath the Continental Crust
    The Mohoroviˇci´cDiscontinuity Beneath the Continental Crust: An Overview of Seismic Constraints Ramon Carbonella,b, Alan Levanderc, Rainer Kindd aEarthquake Research Institute, Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan bCSIC-Inst. Ci`enciesde la Terra Jaume Almera, Barcelona, Spain cRice Univ. Houston, TX, USA dGFZ, Potsdam, Germany Abstract The seismic signature of the Moho from which geologic and tectonic evo- lution hypothesis are derived are to a large degree a result of the seismic methodology which has been used to obtain the image. Seismic data of different types, passive source (earthquake) broad-band recordings, and con- trolled source seismic refraction, densely recorded wide-angle deep seismic reflection, and normal incidence reflection (using VibroseisTM, explosives, or airguns), have contributed to the description of the Moho as a relatively complex transition zone. Of critical importance for the quality and resolu- tion of the seismic image are the acquisition parameters, used in the imaging experiments. A variety of signatures have been obtained for the Moho at different scales generally dependent upon bandwidth of the seismic source. This variety prevents the development of a single universally applicable in- terpretation. In this way source frequency content, and source and sensor spacing determine the vertical and lateral resolution of the images, respec- tively. In most cases the different seismic probes provide complementary data that gives a fuller picture of the physical structure of the Moho, and its relationship to a petrologic crust-mantle transition. In regional seismic studies carried out using passive source recordings the Moho is a relatively well defined structure with marked lateral continuity. The characteristics of this boundary change depending on the geology and tectonic evolution of the targeted area.
    [Show full text]