DOCSLIB.ORG

Ibrahim Bangura

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dissertation A Critical Assessment of the Socio- Economic Reintegration Process of Ex-Combatants Ten Years After the War in Sierra Leone Ibrahim Bangura Email: [email protected] Abstract: This study examines the current socio-economic status of the ex-combatants 10 years after the confl ict in Sierra Leone. It examines the job opportunities, political space, relationship with community members, challenges faced, social networks involved in, relationship with former colleagues, access to land and other issues that are signifi cant in the reintegration process of ex-combatants. It further studies the national socio-economic environment and how ex-comba- tants are faring in the overall post-war recovery process in Sierra Leone. Special focus lies on the Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (DDR) programme which was part of the Lome Peace Agreement signed in 1999. The study also comes up with recommen- dations as to how the challenges currently faced by ex-combatants could be overcome. A Critical Assessment of the Socio- Economic Reintegration Process of Ex- Combatants Ten Years after the War in Sierra Leone Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Economics (Dr. rer. oec.) at HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management Leipzig, Germany submitted by Ibrahim Bangura Leipzig, October 18, 2013 First Assessor: Prof. Dr. Arnis Vilks HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management Chair of Microeconomics Second Assessor: Prof. Dr. Andreas Suchanek HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management Chair of Economic and Business Ethics Dedication This thesis is dedicated to people of Sierra Leone. The journey has not been an easy one but we are now seeing the light at the end of the tunnel. My heart and prayers are always with you. 2 Acknowledgement The journey of undertaking my doctoral study promised to be slow and painful from the outset, but the support and encouragement provided by my supervisor Prof. Dr. Arnis Vilks propelled me to complete the process. The precise emails and regular meetings gave me a sense of direction whenever I felt I had lost my way. Also, his great ability to present alternative perspectives helped to broaden my understanding and develop the ability to look at the small as well as big picture. Many thanks Prof. Vilks, I am forever grateful. I would also like to thank several people for the support provided during the three years of my doctoral studies. First of all the HHL family, Iris Petzschmann, Prof. Dr. Althammer, Prof. Dr. Andreas Suchanek, Raluca Modoiu, and all the very helpful people who I have not named. Thank you for the support and kindly note that it was useful to me, every step of the way. My sincere appreciation goes to all those that I met during my field studies. Your stories were carefully noted and I tried my very best to ensure that they are presented as you told them. Always know that you have a special place in my heart, and in my prayers. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends for the love and support provided. You were the rock I leaned on when the going got tough. 3 Table of Contents Dedication ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgement .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 8 2. Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................................................................... 11 3. Context .............................................................................................................................................................. 25 3.1 Origins of the war in Sierra Leone .............................................................................................................. 25 3.2 Factions involved in the conflict ................................................................................................................. 31 3.3 Recruitment patterns.................................................................................................................................. 37 3.4 Peace Agreements ...................................................................................................................................... 39 3.5 Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration of Ex-combatants ......................................................... 46 4. Research Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 58 4.1 Research Question ...................................................................................................................................... 58 4.2 Conceptual Scheme .................................................................................................................................... 59 4.3 Operationalization of Major Concepts ....................................................................................................... 60 4.4 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................. 62 4.5 Location of the Research ............................................................................................................................ 63 4.6 Unit of Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 64 5. Findings ............................................................................................................................................................. 66 5.1.1 Current social status of former male combatants ................................................................................... 71 5.1.2 Current social status of former female combatants ................................................................................ 76 5.1.2 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 83 5.2. Current economic status of former combatants ....................................................................................... 85 5.2.1 Former Male Combatants ................................................................................................................... 85 5.2.2 Former Female Combatants ................................................................................................................ 94 5.2.3 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 102 6. Conclusions and recommendations ................................................................................................................ 105 6.1 Final Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 105 6.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 109 7. Bibliography .................................................................................................................................................... 116 8. Annex .............................................................................................................................................................. 123 Annex 1: Research Questionnaire .................................................................................................................. 123 Annex 2: Organisations visited during field consultations .............................................................................. 127 Annex 3. Declaration of authorship ................................................................................................................ 129 4 Abstract Sierra Leone was faced with a decade of a very bloody civil conflict. The conflict led to the mutilation and death of thousands of Sierra Leoneans with over a million becoming either internally displaced or leaving the country to become refugees in other countries. The war was started on the 23 rd of March, 1991 by the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) but other factions such as the Civil Defence Force (CDF), the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC) and the so-called West Side Boys became key actors as the conflict progressed. The Lome Peace Agreement signed in 1999 established as one of its components the setting implementation of a Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (DDR) programme. At the end of the DDR in 2005 over 76,000 ex-combatants from the different factions were reintegrated into their communities of choice or origin. Coupled with this, they were assisted with reintegration
Recommended publications
  • 1 Sierra Leone

    1 Sierra Leone

    Sierra Leone – Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 18 March 2010 Information as to what recent wars Sierra Leone has been involved in and when they ended. In a section titled “History” the United Kingdom Foreign & Commonwealth Office country profile for Sierra Leone states: “The SLPP ruled until 1967 when the electoral victory of the opposition APC was cut short by the country's first military coup. But the military eventually handed over to the APC and its leader Siaka Stevens in 1968. He turned the country into a one -party state in 1978. He finally retired in 1985, handing over to his deputy, General Momoh. Under popular pressure, one party rule was ended in 1991, and a new constitution providing for a return to multi-party politics was approved in August of that year. Elections were scheduled for 1992. But, by this stage, Sierra Leone's institutions had collapsed, mismanagement and corruption had ruined the economy and rising youth unemployment was a serious problem. Taking advantage of the collapse, a rebel movement, the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) emerged, with backing from a warlord, Charles Taylor, in neighbouring Liberia, and in 1991 led a rebellion against the APC government. The government was unable to cope with the insurrection, and was overthrown in a junior Officers coup in April 1992. Its leader, Capt Strasser, was however unable to defeat the RUF. Indeed, the military were more often than not complicit with the rebels in violence and looting.” (United Kingdom Foreign & Commonwealth Office (25 February 2009) Country Profiles: Sub-Saharan Africa – Sierra Leone) This profile summarises the events of the period 1996 to 2002 as follows: “Strasser was deposed in January 1996 by his fellow junta leaders.
  • Sierra Leone

    Sierra Leone

    SIERRA LEONE 350 Fifth Ave 34 th Floor New York, N.Y. 10118-3299 http://www.hrw.org (212) 290-4700 Vol. 15, No. 1 (A) – January 2003 I was captured together with my husband, my three young children and other civilians as we were fleeing from the RUF when they entered Jaiweii. Two rebels asked to have sex with me but when I refused, they beat me with the butt of their guns. My legs were bruised and I lost my three front teeth. Then the two rebels raped me in front of my children and other civilians. Many other women were raped in public places. I also heard of a woman from Kalu village near Jaiweii being raped only one week after having given birth. The RUF stayed in Jaiweii village for four months and I was raped by three other wicked rebels throughout this A woman receives psychological and medical treatment in a clinic to assist rape period. victims in Freetown. In January 1999, she was gang-raped by seven revels in her village in northern Sierra Leone. After raping her, the rebels tied her down and placed burning charcoal on her body. (c) 1999 Corinne Dufka/Human Rights -Testimony to Human Rights Watch Watch “WE’LL KILL YOU IF YOU CRY” SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN THE SIERRA LEONE CONFLICT 1630 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 500 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road 15 Rue Van Campenhout Washington, DC 20009 London N1 9HF, UK 1000 Brussels, Belgium TEL (202) 612-4321 TEL: (44 20) 7713 1995 TEL (32 2) 732-2009 FAX (202) 612-4333 FAX: (44 20) 7713 1800 FAX (32 2) 732-0471 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] January 2003 Vol.
  • 26 May 2005 Dear Madam President, I Have The

    26 May 2005 Dear Madam President, I Have The

    THE SECRETARY-GENERAL 26 May 2005 Dear Madam President, I have the honour to refer to General Assembly resolution 58/284 (2004) of 8 April 2004 in which the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to invite the Special Court for Sierra Leone to adopt a completion strategy and also requested the Secretary-General to inform both the Security Council and the General Assembly at its 59th session about this matter. In accordance with the above-mentioned resolution, I am pleased to forward to the Security Council the final completion strategy which has been prepared by the Special Court and endorsed by the Management Committee of the Court which is responsible for advising me on the non-judicial aspects of the Court's work. Please accept, Madam President, the assurances of my highest consideration. -KofVA. Annan Her Excellency Ms. Ellen Margrethe L0j President of the Security Council New York THE SECRETARY-GENERAL 26 May 2005 Dear Mr. President, I have the honour to refer to General Assembly resolution 58/284 (2004) of 8 April 2004 in which the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to invite the Special Court for Sierra Leone to adopt a completion strategy and also requested the Secretary-General to inform both the Security Council and the General Assembly at its 59th session about this matter. In accordance with the above-mentioned resolution, I am pleased to forward to the General Assembly the final completion strategy which has been prepared by the Special Court and endorsed by the Management Committee of the Court which is responsible for advising me on the non-judicial aspects of the Court's work.
  • Three Studies in Conflict in Studies Three

    Three Studies in Conflict in Studies Three

    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Browse Reports & Bookstore TERRORISM AND Make a charitable contribution HOMELAND SECURITY For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the Pardee RAND Graduate School View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the Pardee RAND Graduate School (PRGS) dissertation series. PRGS dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world’s leading producer of Ph.D.’s in policy analysis. The dissertation has been supervised, reviewed, and approved by the graduate fellow’s faculty committee. Three Studies in Conflict Dissertation Three Studies in Conflict Elizabeth Wilke Elizabeth Wilke This product is part of the Pardee RAND Graduate School (PRGS) dissertation series.
  • Profile of Internal Displacement : Sierra Leone

    Profile of Internal Displacement : Sierra Leone

    PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : SIERRA LEONE Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 15 October, 2003) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 9 BACKGROUND TO THE CONFLICT 9 CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS SINCE INDEPENDENCE (1961 - 2000) 9 HISTORICAL OUTLINE OF THE FIRST EIGHT YEARS OF CONFLICT (1991-1998) 13 CONTINUED CONFLICT DESPITE THE SIGNING OF THE LOME PEACE AGREEMENT (JULY 1999-MAY 2000) 16 PEACE PROCESS DERAILED AS SECURITY SITUATION WORSENED DRAMATICALLY IN MAY 2000 18 RELATIVELY STABLE SECURITY SITUATION SINCE SIGNING OF CEASE-FIRE AGREEMENT IN ABUJA ON 10 NOVEMBER 2000 20 CIVIL WAR DECLARED OVER FOLLOWING THE FULL DEPLOYMENT OF UNAMSIL AND THE COMPLETION OF DISARMAMENT (JANUARY 2002) 22 REGIONAL EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN PEACE IN SIERRA LEONE (2002) 23 SIERRA LEONEANS GO TO THE POLLS TO RE-ELECT AHMAD TEJAN KABBAH AS PRESIDENT (MAY 2002) 24 SIERRA LEONE’S SPECIAL COURT AND TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION START WORK (2002-2003) 25 MAIN CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 28 COUNTRYWIDE DISPLACEMENT
  • IDRC Doctoral Research Award No

    IDRC Doctoral Research Award No

    IDRC Doctoral Research Award No. 103342-9990675-067 Technical Report Submitted By: M. Zubairu Wai Date: 12 July 2008 Project: Understanding Contemporary Conflicts in Africa: The Sierra Leone Civil War and its Challenge to the Dominant Representations of African Conflicts Introduction: The aim of this research was two fold: first, it sought to go beyond the immediate impact of policy, and develop an epistemological critique of knowledge on contemporary African conflicts and assess the impact of such knowledge on the formulation of policy; and second to develop alternative ways of looking at such conflicts in order to allow for the reformulation of extant policies as well as the articulation of alternative ones. It started from the basic assumption (as suggested by evidence) that the policies derived from the dominant studies on African conflicts were not producing their desired results where they are being implemented, a proposition that was leading to a questioning of the knowledge and the analytical frameworks on which they are based. The research therefore sought to address this problem by (a) developing a critique of the existing body of knowledge on African conflicts; and (b) suggesting alternative interpretations that would help us better understand these conflicts. Using the Sierra Leone civil war as its empirical case, it sought to investigate: (a) what the modalities of the dominant perspectives on contemporary African conflicts were; (b) Who produces them, how and why?; (c) what were included and left out in the knowledge produced (d) what effects were these knowledge having on the articulation of policy towards Africa; what these policies were and what they sought to achieve; and finally, (f) how an alternative reading of the Sierra Leone civil war might lead to the formulation of better understanding and policies.
  • The Meaning of a Militia: Understanding the Civil Defence Forces of Sierra Leone

    The Meaning of a Militia: Understanding the Civil Defence Forces of Sierra Leone

    African Affairs, 106/425, 639–662 doi: 10.1093/afraf/adm054 C The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved ! THE MEANING OF A MILITIA: UNDERSTANDING THE CIVIL DEFENCE FORCES OF SIERRA LEONE DANNY HOFFMAN ABSTRACT This article is an adapted, narrative version of an expert witness report the author wrote for the Defence of one of the accused before the Spe- cial Court for Sierra Leone. The case against the Civil Defence Forces militia was predicated in part on the argument that the CDF was a mil- itary organization with military-style command and control. Based on a close reading of the Prosecution’s military expert witness report and the author’s ethnographic research with the militia, the article outlines a case for understanding the CDF as the militarization of a social network rather than as a military organization. This framing has implications not only for post-conflict adjudication, but for how we think about and intervene in violent contexts throughout contemporary West Africa. ON 14 JUNE 2005 COLONEL RICHARD IRON TOOK THE WITNESS STAND in the case against the Civil Defence Forces at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. The Court was trying those accused of bearing ‘greatest responsi- bility for serious violations of humanitarian law and Sierra Leonean law’ during the latter half of the country’s ten-year war. Iron, a British officer, was in Freetown to answer the Defence’s challenge to a report he wrote on behalf of the Prosecution. Iron’s report did not speak directly to the ultimate issue, the Court’s terminology for the guilt or innocence of the accused.
  • Sierra Leone Assessment

    Sierra Leone Assessment

    Sierra Leone, Country Information http://194.203.40.90/ppage.asp?section=...erra%20Leone%2C%20Country%20Information SIERRA LEONE ASSESSMENT April 2002 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III HISTORY IV STATE STRUCTURES V HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES VI HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VII HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A: CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS ANNEX B: POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX C: PROMINENT PEOPLE REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL I. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1. This assessment has been produced by the Country Information & Policy Unit, Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2. The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3. The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4. It is intended to revise the assessment on a 6-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum producing countries in the United Kingdom. 1.5. An electronic copy of the assessment has been made available to the following organisations: Amnesty International UK 1 of 43 07/11/2002 5:44 PM Sierra Leone, Country Information http://194.203.40.90/ppage.asp?section=...erra%20Leone%2C%20Country%20Information Immigration Advisory Service Immigration Appellate Authority Immigration Law Practitioners' Association Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants JUSTICE Medical Foundation for the care of Victims of Torture Refugee Council Refugee Legal Centre UN High Commissioner for Refugees 2.
  • G U I N E a Liberia Sierra Leone

    G U I N E a Liberia Sierra Leone

    The boundaries and names shown and the designations Mamou used on this map do not imply official endorsement or er acceptance by the United Nations. Nig K o L le n o G UINEA t l e a SIERRA Kindia LEONEFaranah Médina Dula Falaba Tabili ba o s a g Dubréka K n ie c o r M Musaia Gberia a c S Fotombu Coyah Bafodia t a e r G Kabala Banian Konta Fandié Kamakwie Koinadugu Bendugu Forécariah li Kukuna Kamalu Fadugu Se Bagbe r Madina e Bambaya g Jct. i ies NORTHERN N arc Sc Kurubonla e Karina tl it Mateboi Alikalia L Yombiro Kambia M Pendembu Bumbuna Batkanu a Bendugu b Rokupr o l e Binkolo M Mange Gbinti e Kortimaw Is. Kayima l Mambolo Makeni i Bendou Bodou Port Loko Magburaka Tefeya Yomadu Lunsar Koidu-Sefadu li Masingbi Koundou e a Lungi Pepel S n Int'l Airport or a Matotoka Yengema R el p ok m Freetown a Njaiama Ferry Masiaka Mile 91 P Njaiama- Wellington a Yele Sewafe Tongo Gandorhun o Hastings Yonibana Tungie M Koindu WESTERN Songo Bradford EAS T E R N AREA Waterloo Mongeri York Rotifunk Falla Bomi Kailahun Buedu a i Panguma Moyamba a Taiama Manowa Giehun Bauya T Boajibu Njala Dambara Pendembu Yawri Bendu Banana Is. Bay Mano Lago Bo Segbwema Daru Shenge Sembehun SOUTHE R N Gerihun Plantain Is. Sieromco Mokanje Kenema Tikonko Bumpe a Blama Gbangbatok Sew Tokpombu ro Kpetewoma o Sh Koribundu M erb Nitti ro River a o i Turtle Is. o M h Sumbuya a Sherbro I.
  • SIERRA LEONA Operacion Barras 2000

    SIERRA LEONA Operacion Barras 2000

    TeoríIa de la Guerra SIERRA LEONA Operacion Barras 2000 TRABAJO FINAL 2017 Teoría de la Guerra 2017 E-mail: [email protected] - Facebook: Teoría Pensamiento Militar - Blog: https://bellumratio.wordpress.com - Blog: Militar Pensamiento Teoría E-mail: [email protected] - Facebook: 2 Teoría de la Guerra 2017 Operacion E-mail: [email protected] - Facebook: Teoría Pensamiento Militar - Blog: https://bellumratio.wordpress.com - Blog: Militar Pensamiento Teoría E-mail: [email protected] - Facebook: Barras INTRODUCCION de ancho y se eleva a 100 m sobre el nivel del mar. En el extremo occidental de la península Aberdeen Creek El amanecer del 10 de septiembre de 2000, en el estado divide la península de Aberdeen al norte de Freetown. de África Occidental y ex colonia británica de Sierra Mientras que había recaladas excelentes no había tierra Leona, fue el escenario de una operación de rescate plana para construir un campo de aviación así que este de rehenes de alto riesgo por parte de los hombres del fue construido en el pueblo de Lungi en la penínsu- Escuadrón D, del 22 Special Air Service Regiment (22 la separada de Freetown por la boca del río de Sierra SAS) Coy) y la Compañía A, del 1er Batallón del 1er Leone. El acceso al aeródromo era en ferry de Freetown Regimiento de Paracaídas (1 Para). El nombre en clave a la aldea de Tangrin y de allí por carretera, o más tarde de la misión fue la Operación Barras. directamente en helicóptero. El aeropuerto jugaría un Las condiciones que condujeron a la Operación Ba- papel importante en la evacuación de civiles de Sierra rras habían comenzado casi 550 años antes cuando Leona y el rápido movimiento de tropas al país durante el explorador marítimo portugués Pedro da Cintra, las operaciones Palliser y Barras.
  • The Law Reports of the Special Court for Sierra Leone Volume I

    The Law Reports of the Special Court for Sierra Leone Volume I

    The Law Reports of the Special Court for Sierra Leone Volume I - Book I The Law Reports of the Special Court for Sierra Leone Volume I Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara and Kanu (The AFRC Case) Book I Edited by Charles Chernor Jalloh Simon M. Meisenberg ᆕ 2012 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The law reports of the Special Court for Sierra Leone / edited by Charles C. Jalloh, Simon M. Meisenberg. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-18911-9 (hardback : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-90-04-22398-1 (e-book) 1. Special Court for Sierra Leone. 2. International criminal law--Sierra Leone--Cases. 3. International criminal courts--Netherlands. I. Jalloh, Charles. II. Meisenberg, Simon M. KZ1208.S53A253 2012 341.6’90268664--dc23 2012010697 Suggested (sample) citation: Judgement, Brima, Kamara and Kanu (‘AFRC’) (SCSL-2004-16-T), Trial Chamber II, 20 June 2007, para. 80 in Jalloh/Meisenberg, SCSL Law Reports - AFRC, Vol. I/2, p. 1229. ISBN 978 90 04 18911 9 (hardback, set) ISBN 978 90 04 22561 9 (hardback, book I) ISBN 978 90 04 22562 6 (hardback, book II) E-ISBN 978 90 04 22398 1 (e-book) ISBN 978 90 04 22161 1 (hardback, complete set) E-ISBN 978 90 04 22162 8 (e-book, complete set) Copyright 2012 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. ƺƹƫƹƴƶƫưƴƣƽƫƶƶƫƹơƺƽƻƺƽƞƿƣƾƿƩƣƫƸƻƽƫƹƿƾƽƫƶƶᄕ ƶƺƟƞƶƽƫƣƹƿƞƶᄕ ƺƿƣƫǀƟƶƫƾƩƫƹƨᄕ IDC Publishers and Martinus Nijhofff Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
  • Sierra Leone Trial Monitoring Program Weekly Report

    Sierra Leone Trial Monitoring Program Weekly Report

    Page 1 of 9 U.C. Berkeley War Crimes Studies Center Sierra Leone Trial Monitoring Program Weekly Report Special Court Monitoring Program Update #14 Trial Chamber I - CDF Trial 26 November 2004 by Michelle Staggs, Senior Researcher Summary Witness Profiles at a Glance Continued cross-examination of Witness TF2-008 Selected "crime base" testimony Command structure and operations of the Kamajors: Testimony of Witness TF2-088 Procedural and Case Management Issues Summary In its penultimate week of trial this session, the Prosecution continued calling witnesses testifying to events which occurred in Sierra Leone’s southern province during 1997-8 [1]. The week began in closed session with the continued cross-examination of Witness TF2-017, followed on Tuesday by the continued cross-examination in open session of Witness TF2-008, who had previously fallen ill and hence been excused from testifying during last week’s proceedings. Witness TF2- 119, Witness TF2-030, Witness TF2-156 and TF2-088 each then testified in continued open sessions, bringing the total number of witnesses called thus far in the CDF trial to 33. A large proportion of the witness testimony provided this week implicated the first accused, Samuel Hinga Norman, as having had knowledge of and authority over the actions of the Kamajors in Bo at this time. In particular, witnesses TF2-119 and TF2-088 gave detailed testimony implying that Hinga Norman was instrumental in either (i) the planning of the attacks or (ii) the reprimanding of junior officers for their actions against civilians, during this time. The testimony given by witnesses this week precipitated particularly heightened displays of emotion, with each of Witness TF2-030 and Witness TF2-088 openly sobbing at various points when recounting the alleged atrocities committed by the Kamajors against members of their families.