Vibrio Vulnificus Monitoring in Recreational Waters Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vibrio Vulnificus Monitoring in Recreational Waters Final Report Vibrio vulnificus Monitoring in Recreational Waters Final Report Publication CBBEP – 54 Project Number – 0624 March 2008 Principal Investigators Joanna Mott, Ph.D., Professor of Biology, Gabriel Ramirez, and Gregory Buck, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Biology and Biomedical Sciences Department of Life Sciences Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Corpus Christi, TX 78412 Submitted to: Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program 1305 N. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 205 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of CBBEP or other organizations that may have provided funding for this project. Vibrio vulnificus Monitoring in Recreational Waters Final Report Report prepared by: Joanna Mott, Ph.D. Professor of Biology, Gabriel Ramirez, and Gregory Buck, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Biology and Biomedical Sciences Department of Life Sciences Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Corpus Christi, TX 78412 CBBEP Project Manager: Jim Bowman Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries Program, Inc. 1305 N. Shoreline, Suite 205 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 3 Induction of Viable but Non-Culturable State................................................................. 7 Culture Media .......................................................................................................................... 8 Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 9 METHODS................................................................................................................................... 10 Sites......................................................................................................................................... 10 Field Collection..................................................................................................................... 18 Laboratory Analysis ............................................................................................................ 19 Statistical Analysis .............................................................................................................. 20 RESULTS.................................................................................................................................... 21 Water Quality Parameters.................................................................................................. 21 Microbiological Analysis.................................................................................................... 29 Statistical Analysis .............................................................................................................. 42 CONCLUSIONS......................................................................................................................... 51 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................. 53 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................................ 54 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................. 59 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location of sample site in upper Laguna Madre on Bird Island Basin at PINS. Google Earth 2006………………………………………………………………...12 Figure 2: Location of sample site in Nueces Bay at North end of US Highway 181. Google Earth 2006………………………………………………………………...13 Figure 3: Location of sample site in Corpus Christi Bay at south end of Cole Park. Google Earth 2006…......................................................................................14 Figure 4: Location of sample site in Redfish Bay at the Morris and Cummings Cut. Google Earth 2006.........................................................................................15 Figure 5: Location of sample site at Copano Bay Causeway at SH35. Google Earth 2006…………………………………………………………………………………16 Figure 6: Location of sample site in Copano Bay off FM136 near Bayside. Google Earth 2006......................................................................................................17 Figure 7: Enterococcus sp. means at sites in south Texas coastal waters from August 2006 through July 2007..................................................................................32 Figure 8: Numbers of V. vulnificus at Bird Island, Nueces Bay and Cole Park sites from August 2006 to July 2007…………………………………………………………34 Figure 9: Numbers of V. vulnificus at Redfish Bay, Copano Bay and Bayside sites from August 2006 to July 2007…………………………………………………………34 Figure 10: Water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen values versus numbers of V. vulnificus at Bird Island from August 2006 through July 2007.............................................................................................................37 Figure 11: Water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen values versus numbers of V. vulnificus at Nueces Bay from August 2006 through July 2007.............................................................................................................38 Figure 12: Water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen values versus numbers of V. vulnificus at Cole Park from August 2006 through July 2007..............39 Figure 13: Water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen values versus numbers of V. vulnificus at Redfish Bay from August 2006 through July 2007..............40 iii Figure 14: Water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen versus numbers of V. vulnificus at Copano Bay Causeway from August 2006 through July 2007……………………………………………………………………………….41 Figure 15: Water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen values versus numbers of V. vulnificus at Copano Bay near Bayside from August 2006 through July 2007.............................................................................................................42 Figure 16: Numbers of V. vulnificus vs. enterococci at Bird Island, Nueces Bay and Cole Park sites from August 2006 to July 2007………………………………43 Figure 17: Numbers of V. vulnificus vs. enterococci at Redfish Bay, Copano Bay and Bayside sites from August 2006 to July 2007………………………………...43 Figure 18: Water temperature versus V. vulnificus at sites in south Texas coastal waters from August 2006 through July 2007...............................................48 Figure 19: Salinity versus V. vulnificus at sites in south Texas coastal waters from August 2006 through July 2007...................................................................49 Figure 20: Dissolved oxygen versus V. vulnificus at sites in south Texas coastal waters from August 2006 through July 2007...........................................................50 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Reported V. vulnificus infections in Texas for the years 2000-2006 by type of exposure (Texas Department of State Health Services, 2008 customized report)………………………………………………………………………………...4 Table 2: Texas Coastal Bend study sites and their coordinates …………........ ………10 Table 3: Historical physical water quality parameter ranges from Bird Island, Nueces Bay, Cole Park, Redfish Bay, Copano Bay, and Bayside for 1969 – 2006 (TCEQ, 2007 http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/compliance/monitoring/crp/data/samplequery.html) ........................................................................................................................11 Table 4: Physical water quality parameters from Bird Island, Nueces Bay, and Cole Park for August 2006 through July 2007........................................................22 Table 5: Physical water quality parameters from Redfish Bay, Copano Bay, and Bayside for August 2006 through July 2007...................................................23 Table 6: Physical water quality parameter statistics from sites in south Texas coastal waters for August 2006 through July 2007.....................................................24 Table 7: Physical water quality parameter ranges from sites in south Texas coastal waters for August 2006 through July 2007.....................................................25 Table 8: Rainfall: one day and one week prior to sampling at Bird Island, Nueces Bay, and Cole Park for August 2006 through July 2007.........................................27 Table 9: Rainfall: one day and one week prior to sampling at Redfish Bay, Copano Bay, and Bayside for August 2006 through July 2007...................................28 Table 10: Numbers of V. vulnificus and Enterococcus sp. at Bird Island, Nueces Bay, and Cole Park for August 2006 through July 2007 (CFU/100mL; average of two samples)…………………………………………………………………….30 Table 11: Numbers of V. vulnificus and Enterococcus sp. at Redfish Bay, Copano Bay, and Bayside for August 2006 through July 2007
Recommended publications
  • RESOURCE GUIDE Formental WELLNESS
    OFFICE OF HIDALGO COUNTY JUDGE RICHARD F. CORTEZ RESOURCE GUIDE forMENTAL WELLNESS @judgecortez This resource guide will provide critical information to our community. Shortly after taking office, I founded the Hidalgo County Mental Health Coalition. The coalition is comprised of various stakeholders within the community. We are very grateful for their guidance in the creation of this resource guide. It is my honor and privilege to serve the constituents of Hidalgo County by providing this valu- able information. Hey, let’s talk hope, RGV! Stay up to date with the Hidalgo County Mental Health Wellness Initiative by visiting our website at www.hidalgocounty.us/HCmhcHope. “ Taking action to secure With much gratitude, your mental wellness is the first step to a healthy life.” Richard F. Cortez, Hidalgo County Judge MENTAL WELLNESS RESOURCE GUIDE HIDALGO COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH COALITION COUNSELING EMAIL: EDUCATION [email protected] HOTLINE / CRISIS MENTAL WELLNESS HIDALGO COUNTY MENTAL WELLNESS INITIATIVE Through important community partnerships, our coalition is building LEGAL RESOURCE a path to create and sustain a shift in our culture, promoting mental well-being, and destigmatizing mental-health care. Our coalition con- SUBSTANCE ABUSE sists of organizations and individuals committed to compiling resources, data, and educational material for the public and providing SUPPORT SERVICES support, compassion, and hope to those living with mental-health conditions. HIDALGO COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH COALITION DISCLOSURE / DISCLAIMER This guide is not a complete list of every resource in the county. If a resource is not listed, it does not mean that the resource does not exist or is not important.
    [Show full text]
  • Drilling Deeper, Climbing Higher Grey Wolf, Inc
    Drilling Deeper, Climbing Higher Grey Wolf, Inc. 2001 Annual Report Grey Wolf, Inc. is a leading provider of contract oil and gas land drilling services in the United States serving major and independent oil and gas companies with its premium fleet of 120 drilling rigs. The Company operates in the South Texas, West Texas, Gulf Coast, Ark-La-Tex, Mississippi/Alabama and Rocky Mountain markets – areas with the nation’s most significant onshore natural gas reserves. With superior equipment and quality crews, Grey Wolf continues to provide value-added services to cus- tomers facing the technical challenges of deeper and more complex drilling projects. TEXAS On the Cover: Based in the Rockies, Grey Wolf’s Rig 558 – one of the world’s largest land rigs – is ideally suited to drill challenging formations to depths exceeding 24,000 feet. Financial Highlights (in thousands, except per share amounts) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Revenues $ 215,923 $ 240,979 $ 147,203 $ 269,334 $ 421,501 Net income (loss) 9,978 (83,213) (41,262) (8,523) 68,453 Earnings (loss) per share: Basic 0.07 (0.50) (0.25) (0.05) 0.38 Diluted 0.07 (0.50) (0.25) (0.05) 0.38 Total Assets 533,752 501,303 452,846 510,866 623,876 Long-term debt 176,530 250,832 249,962 249,851 250,695 Shareholders' equity 249,216 166,691 125,577 173,416 245,297 Working capital 66,644 44,489 16,353 60,029 113,163 Operational Highlights Operating days 24,405 26,230 16,436 26,107 30,924 Average revenue per rig day $ 8,847 $ 9,187 $ 8,956 $ 10,317 $ 13,630 Average margin per rig day $ 2,187 $ 1,824 $ 382 $ 2,150 $ 5,963 Average rigs operating 67 72 45 71 85 1 To Our Shareholders We were disappointed that the up-cycle in drilling 2001 was the best year in Grey Wolf’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Rio Grande Valley/Deep S. Texas Hurricane Guide
    The Official Rio Grande Valley/Deep South Texas HURRICANE GUIDE 2021 IT ONLY TAKES ONE STORM! weather.gov/rgv A Letter to Residents After more than a decade of near-misses, 2020 reminded the Rio Grande Valley and Deep South Texas that hurricanes are still a force to be reckoned with. Hurricane Hanna cut a swath from Padre Island National Seashore in Kenedy County through much of the Rio Grande Valley in late July, leaving nearly $1 billion in agricultural and property damage it its wake. While many may now think that we’ve paid our dues, that sentiment couldn’t be further from the truth! The combination of atmospheric and oceanic patterns favorable for a landfalling hurricane in the Rio Grande Valley/Deep South Texas region can occur in any season, including this one. Residents can use the experience of Hurricane Hanna in 2020 as a great reminder to be prepared in 2021. Hurricanes bring a multitude of hazards including flooding rain, damaging winds, deadly storm surge, and tornadoes. These destructive forces can displace you from your home for months or years, and there are many recent cases in the United States and territories where this has occurred. Hurricane Harvey (2017), Michael (2018, Florida Panhandle), and Laura (2020, southwest Louisiana) are just three such devastating events. This guide can help you and your family get prepared. Learn what to do before, during and after a storm. Your plan should include preparations for your home or business, gathering supplies, ensuring your insurance is up to date, and planning with your family for an evacuation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ostracoda in Texas Bays Wand Lagoons: an Ecologic Study
    CHARLES E. KIj Ostracoda in and LOUIS S. KORMCKER Texas Bays Wand Lagoons: An Ecologic Study SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • 1970 NUMBER 24 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Insti- tution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge not strictly professional." This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to ^oology Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of professional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. Each publica- tion is distributed by mailing lists to libraries, laboratories, institutes, and interested specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smith- sonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation on South Texas Border Initiatives
    PRESENTATION ON SOUTH TEXAS BORDER INITIATIVES Teri Flack, Deputy Commissioner Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Before the House Border and International Affairs Committee March 6, 2003 _____________________________________________________ Overview of the South Texas Border Initiatives In 1989, the 71st Texas Legislature began the South Texas/Border Initiative. Appropriations were increased and measures implemented to enhance the scope and quality of higher education institutions and programs along the Texas-Mexico Border. Most people acknowledge that the LULAC v. Richards lawsuit supported by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) was a catalyst for this initiative. The lawsuit alleged that South Texas and Border universities were not getting their fair share of funding from the state. The lawsuit noted differences in quantity and quality of academic programs at these universities compared to those in other areas of the state. Although the Texas Supreme Court overturned a lower court’s ruling in favor of MALDEF, the Legislature decided that it would be in the best interest of the state to enhance the South Texas/Border Region. There is general agreement that nine institutions were a part of the initiative: • Texas A&M International University, • Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, • Texas A&M University-Kingsville, • The University of Texas at Brownsville, • The University of Texas at El Paso, • The University of Texas-Pan American, • The University of Texas at San Antonio, • Sul Ross State University (including Sul Ross State University Rio Grande College), and • The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. In some biennia, Texas Tech University, the University of Houston, and Texas A&M University also received funding to support programs in the Border region as part of the South Texas Border Initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status and Historical Trends of Seagrass in the CCBNEP Study
    Current Status and Historical Trends of Seagrass in the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program CCBNEP-20 • October 1997 This project has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #CE-9963-01-2 to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. The contents of this document do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, nor do the contents of this document necessarily constitute the views or policy of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Management Conference or its members. The information presented is intended to provide background information, including the professional opinion of the authors, for the Management Conference deliberations while drafting official policy in the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). The mention of trade names or commercial products does not in any way constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. Current Status and Historical Trends of Seagrasses in the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area Warren Pulich, Jr., Ph.D. Catherine Blair Coastal Studies Program Texas Parks & Wildlife Department 3000 IH 35 South Austin, Texas 78704 and William A. White The University of Texas at Austin Bureau of Economic Geology University Station Box X Austin, Texas 78713 Publication CCBNEP - 20 October 1997 Policy Committee Commissioner John Baker Mr. Jerry Clifford Policy Committee Chair Policy Committee Vice-Chair Texas Natural Resource Conservation Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6 Commission The Honorable Vilma Luna Commissioner Ray Clymer State Representative Texas Parks and Wildlife Department The Honorable Carlos Truan Commissioner Garry Mauro Texas Senator Texas General Land Office The Honorable Josephine Miller Commissioner Noe Fernandez County Judge, San Patricio County Texas Water Development Board The Honorable Loyd Neal Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 28.6-ACRE WATERFRONT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 28.6 ACRES of Leisure on the La Buena Vida Texas Coastline
    La Buena Rockport/AransasVida Pass, Texas 78336 La Buena Vida 28.6-ACRE WATERFRONT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 28.6 ACRES Of leisure on the La Buena Vida Texas coastline. ROCKPORT/ARANSAS PASS EXCLUSIVE WATERFRONT COMMUNITY ACCESSIBILITY Adjacent to Estes Flats, Redfish Bay & Aransas Bay, popular salt water fishing spots for Red & Black drum Speckled Trout, and more. A 95-acre residential enclave with direct channel access to the Intracoastal IDEAL LOCATION Waterway, Redfish Bay, and others Nestled between the two recreational’ sporting towns of Rockport & Aransas Pass. LIVE OAK COUNTRY CLUB TX-35 35 TEXAS PALM HARBOR N BAHIA BAY ISLANDS OF ROCKORT LA BUENA VIDA 35 TEXAS CITY BY THE SEA TX-35 35 TEXAS ARANSAS BAY GREGORY PORT ARANSAS ARANSAS McCAMPBELL PASS PORTER AIRPORT 361 SAN JOSE ISLAND 361 361 INGLESIDE INGLESIDE ON THE BAY REDFISH BAY PORT ARANSAS MUSTANG BEACH AIRPORT SPREAD 01 At Home in Rockport & Aransas Pass Intimate & Friendly Coastal Community RECREATIONAL THRIVING DESTINATION ARTS & CULTURE Opportunity for fishing, A strong artistic and waterfowl hunting, cultural identity boating, water sports, • Local art center camping, hiking, golf, etc. • Variety of galleries • Downtown museums • Cultural institutions NATURAL MILD WINTERS & PARADISE WARM SUMMERS Featuring some of the best Destination for “Winter birdwatching in the U.S. Texans,” those seeking Home to Aransas National reprieve from colder Wildlife Refuge, a protected climates. haven for the endangered Whooping Crane and many other bird and marine species. SPREAD 02 N At Home in Rockport & Aransas Pass ARANSAS COUNTY AREA ATTRACTIONS & AIRPORT AMENITIES FULTON FULTON BEACH HARBOUR LIGHT PARK SALT LAKE POPEYES COTTAGES PIZZA HUT HAMPTON INN IBC BANK THE INN AT ACE HARDWARE FULTON ELEMENTARY FULTON HARBOUR SCHOOL ENROLLMENT: 509 THE LIGHTHOUSE INN - ROCKPORT FM 3036 BROADWAY ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Estuaries in the Balance: the Copano/Aransas Estuary Curriculum Guide
    Estuaries in the Balance: The Copano/Aransas Estuary Curriculum Guide Development of this curriculum was made possible by funding from the Texas General Land Office Coast- al Management Program. The curriculum was developed and modified from “Project PORTS”, created by Lisa Calvo at Rutgers University and available at http://hsrl.rutgers.edu/~calvo/PORTS/Welcome.html. PRIMER DISCOVERING THE 1 COPANO/ARANSAS BAY SYSTEM The Copano/Aransas Estuary is the region where waters from the Mis- sion and Aransas Rivers flow into the Copano Bay, and from there, to the RELATED VOCABULARY Aransas Bay and then the Gulf of Mexico. Estuaries are dynamic sys- tems where tidal and river currents mix fresh river water with salty ocean Estuary—an area partially surrounded by land where fresh water and salt water meet. water. As a result the salt content, or salinity, of estuarine waters varies from fresh to brackish to salt water. Copano Bay, fed by the Mission and Watershed—an area of land drained by a river Aransas Rivers and Copano Creek, covers about 65 square miles. The or other body of water. Copano Bay watershed drains an area of 1,388,781 square miles. It Salinity—the salt content of water. Estuarine connects to Aransas Bay, which has an area of 70 square miles and is waters vary from fresh (no salt) to marine (salty ocean water). in turn bordered on the east by San Jose Island, a 21-mile long barrier island. Density—the mass (amount of material) in a certain volume of matter. Estuaries serve as vital habitats and critical nursery grounds for many Euryhaline—describing species which can toler- species of plants and animals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Christmas 2004 South Texas Snow Event: Diagnosis of the Heavy Snow Band
    THE HISTORIC CHRISTMAS 2004 SOUTH TEXAS SNOW EVENT: DIAGNOSIS OF THE HEAVY SNOW BAND Ronald F. Morales Jr. NOAA/NationalCorpus Christi, Weather Texas Service Weather Forecast Office Abstract On 24 and 25 December 2004, a rare, banded heavy snow event occurred over portions of south Texas. Maximum snow amounts of 20-33 cm (8-13 inches) were reported in the band region. Such amounts had not been observed in south Texas since the late 1800s. Moisture, lift, stability, and -1 across thermal profiles for the event were examined. On the synoptic scale, the event was associated with a strong low-latitude upper- level trough (26-28˚N) and jet stream maximum of 72-77 m s northern Mexico and southern Texas. This trough and jet maximum combined to produce large scale lift over an already sufficiently moist south Texas region. At lower levels, a deep freezing/sub-freezing advectionair mass was at lower present levels. as far south as northern Mexico. Confluent upper-level flow located northeast of the It snow was surmised region, helped that the to rarity maintain of the a deepevent coldwas dueair mass to the by combination producing northerlyof the very flow low- and latitude cold hPa heights and 850 hPa temperatures within the trough over north central Mexico were around four standardupper-level deviations trough, andbelow the normal deep cold during air themass. event. Anomaly calculations confirmed that both the 500 To diagnose the snow band region, cross sections of saturated equivalent potential vorticity (EPV*), Petterssen frontogenesis, saturated equivalent potential temperature (θes), and relative humidity (RH) were constructed perpendicular to the snow band.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcallen Economic Profile 2019
    McAllen Economic Profile 2019 The City of McAllen economic scan presented here is intended to provide an overview and comparison of both temporal and point-in-time socio-economic data to assist City of McAllen leaders. Objective data is an important component of making sound public policy decisions. Prior to undertaking the economic scan, the McAllen Chamber of Com- merce compiled and analyzed data from both public and proprietary sources in order to identify trends in the city that have a significant impact on Hidalgo County’s economy. The resulting data was used to conduct a SWOT analysis, which character- ized the County’s strengths; weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) in economic development. In some cases, the economic scan builds on previous data from the SWOT analysis. The general layout of the economic scan is to provide information in a written and graphical format that can be updated by county and EDC staff in the future as new publicly available data is released. The economic scan provides an overview of data important to broadly defined economic development planning, but it cannot capture every indicator or level of detail for all data sections. General observations and notes on the measures provided are included within the economic scan. TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. McAllen Overview 2. Population 3. Economic Factors 4. Retail Trade 5. Cost of Living 6. Economic Trends 7. Competition 8. Social Factors 9. Quality of Place 10. Education System 11. Health Care Environment 12. Political Factors 13. Infrastructure 1 McAllen Overview Demographic Characteristics Eighty years ago, the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas was a rural, agriculture-based economy characterized by sporadic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Basin Summary Report San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin Nueces River Basin Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin
    2008 Basin Summary Report San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin Nueces River Basin Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin August 2008 Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Clean Rivers Program Table of Contents List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Significant Findings ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Public Involvement ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Public Outreach .............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 Water Quality Reviews .................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Water Quality Terminology
    [Show full text]
  • Living Resources Report Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Results - Open Bay Habitat
    Center for Coastal Studies CCBNEP Living Resources Report Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Results - Open Bay Habitat B. Living Resources - Habitats Detailed community profiles of estuarine habitats within the CCBNEP study area are not available. Therefore, in the following sections, the organisms, community structure, and ecosystem processes and functions of the major estuarine habitats (Open Bay, Oyster Reef, Hard Substrate, Seagrass Meadow, Coastal Marsh, Tidal Flat, Barrier Island, and Gulf Beach) within the CCBNEP study area are presented. The following major subjects will be addressed for each habitat: (1) Physical setting and processes; (2) Producers and Decomposers; (3) Consumers; (4) Community structure and zonation; and (5) Ecosystem processes. HABITAT 1: OPEN BAY Table Of Contents Page 1.1. Physical Setting & Processes ............................................................................ 45 1.1.1 Distribution within Project Area ......................................................... 45 1.1.2 Historical Development ....................................................................... 45 1.1.3 Physiography ...................................................................................... 45 1.1.4 Geology and Soils ................................................................................ 46 1.1.5 Hydrology and Chemistry ................................................................... 47 1.1.5.1 Tides .................................................................................... 47 1.1.5.2 Freshwater
    [Show full text]