DOCSLIB.ORG

Arcawnm FEB 2 5 1982

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arcawnm FEB 2 5 1982 A SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF SPACE INDUSTRIALIZATION by David L. Akin S. B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1974) S. M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1975) Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Science in Aerospace Systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology August, 1981 @ Massachusetts Institute of Technology Signature of Author Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics July 31, 1981 Certified by Rene H. Miller Thesis Supervisor Certified by Richard Battin Thesis Supervisor Certified by Jack L. Kerrebrock Thesis Supervisor Certified by James W. Mar Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Harold Y. Wachman C&Lirman, Department Doctoral Committee ArCAWNM MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEB 2 5 1982 UBRAUES 1 PAGE 2 A SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF SPACE INDUSTRIALIZATION by David L. Akin Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on July 31, 1981 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of - Doctor of Science in the field of Aerospace Systems ABSTRACT Space industrialization is defined as the use of nonterrestri- al resources to support industrial activities which produce a net return on investment. The particular area of interest in this study is the use of the moon as a source of raw materials for production processes in space. Systems analysis is defined as the group of analysis techniques used to calculate both the technical feasibility and the economic viability of a candi- date system or process. Following a review of past research in space industrialization, a discussion of likely products for near-term space industrial capabilities is presented. Candi- date locations in the Earth-Moon systems are presented, and nine possible locations are selected for inclusion in this study. Velocity increments between orbital locations are found, including the estimation of plane change requirements, and an analysis of the effect of nonimpulsive and continual thrusting trajectories on AV requirements is made. A multicon- ic technique is used for accurate trajectory analysis between the earth and the moon, and for flights to libration points. With all locations specified, individual system analyses are performed to optimally size transportation vehicles. Earth launch vehicles are parametrically analyzed for the cases of one and two stages to orbit, with internal reusable and external expendable propellant tanks. The production system is defined, and broken down into component processes of mining, refining, manufacturing, and assembly. Estimates of signif- icant parameters are made for each step. Costing algorithms are derived, and costing performed on inte- grated production systems. Candidate production scenarios, comprising the most cost-effective alternatives for a total program systems identified in earlier sections, are collected for later optimization. PAGE 3 One of the primary contributions of this work is the develop- ment of a new operations research technique, which can be used to solve a variant of the "knapsack" problem without resorting to classical integer programming. The problem addressed is one of optimal investment: with limited resources, optimize the distribution of resources among a set of competing systems over a length of time so as to maximize the net return over the life- time of the program. The new solution technique, diagonal ascent linear programming (DALP), is derived and shown to produce a heuristic optimum for a sample problem of solar power satellite production. The technique is applicable to problems of competing systems which can be categorized by recurring and nonrecurring costs and returns: the returns may be either lump sum or recurring. The product of the analysis is a heuristic optimum solution for best investment of a resource in a year-by-year manner over recurring and nonrecurring costs of each system, in order to maximize the net return of the entire production scenario over its operational lifetime. Systems will be funded only if they contribute favorably to the return on investment, and multiple systems will be phased by finding the initial operational dates for each system which will maxi- mize the value of the objective function. Examples use cost criteria as the objective function: net present value func- tions are included in the analysis procedure for these cases. The DALP analysis technique is used to find near-optimal stategies for competing solar power satellite production schemes; to find the best choice of vehicle configuration for a space shuttle based on the information available to NASA when the decision was made in 1973; and to optimize the selection of upper stages to use with the current Space Transportation Sys- tem. In addition, further refinements of the solution algorithm are described which take into account such higher-order effects as commonality between competing systems and learning curve effects on recurring costs. Conclusions are drawn on the original question of nonterrestrial materials utilization, and on the use and applications of the diagonal ascent linear programming technique derived in order to ana- lyze the original problem. Thesis Supervisor: Rene H. Miller Slater Professor of Flight Transportation Thesis Supervisor: Richard H. Battin Adjunct Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor: Jack L. Kerrebrock MacLaurin Professor in Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor: James W. Mar Hunsaker Professor of Aerospace Education ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is not possible to spend ten years at one place, six of them working on (or at) a doctoral thesis, without being indebted to a large number of people. Were I to recount all the friendships along the way, I would have to have to have a separate volume for the acknowledgements: so, I would like to thank all my friends en masse, apologize to those I overlook here, and spe- cifically acknowledge those without whom the past years would not have been possible. First of all, I would like to thank all those who have served on my thesis committee since its inception. If any one single per- son could be said to be responsible (in the best possible sense) for this thesis, it would have to be Prof. Rene H. Miller, who was willing to extend a research assistantship to a new doctoral student interested in designing space stations instead of MX guidance systems. His support, counseling, guid- ance, and friendship over the years has made this work possible. Prof. Jack L. Kerrebrock always made sure my academ- ic progress was adequate, and deserves credit as well for being the only other member of my committee (besides Prof. Miller) who endured from the beginning to the end of this effort. I would like to thank Prof. John McCarthy, who saw to it that I eventually learned the first law of thermodynamics, Prof. Richard Battin, orbital mechanics mentor extraordinaire, and Prof. James Mar, who was nice enough not to ask a question at my general exams. I am also in debt to Dr. Phil Chapman, for several interesting conversations which helped to frame the initial direction of this thesis. I would especially like to thank Prof. Amedeo Odoni, who provided invaluable assistance on the operations research chapter. I would like to acknowledge the memory of two friends who did not live to see this thesis completed. Dr. Ted Edelbaum was one of the original members of my thesis committee, and largely responsible for the orbital mechanics section of this work. And Fred Merlis, technical instructor, whose highest title was that of friend. There have been many people along the way who, while not directly involved with this thesis, have meant a great deal to my ability to stay sane and finish this work, and I would like to thanks them all briefly. If the first place on a list is a place of honor, then that position would have to go to Mr. Al Shaw, who kept me from slicing my fingers off on the milling machine as a freshman, and who has been instructor, confidant, and friend ever since. I would like to thank David B. S. Smith, who bet me that I could not work the word "brontosaurus" into my thesis (you just lost, Dave!), for the use of his Apple comput- er, on which a large portion of the orbital mechanics was PAGE 5 programmed. I want to acknowledge and thank all of the members, past and present, of the Lab of Orbital Productivity, (better known as the Loonie Loopies), without whom this thesis would have been completed three years ago. I am especially indebted to Dave Mohr, who helped me through the ordeal of a doctoral language exam. I apologize to all of you for being such a grouch over the last six months while finishing this thesis. Acknowledgements are due to the authors from whom I borrowed the quotes at the beginning of each chapter: Konstantin Tsiolkowsky, George Lucas, Arthur C. Clarke, Walter Lippmann, and especially Carey Rockwell, whose Tom Corbett, Space Cadet books were responsible for awakening my interest in space at the age of five. I would especially like to thank my adopted second family, the Bowdens, for their support over the last few years. Stella, Becky, and, of course, my clone Marc (Margaret) kept me sup- plied with cookies and good cheer over the course of writing this thesis, and are the best sisters that anyone never had. Finally, there are three people for whom no verbal or written words are sufficient to express my thanks and admiration. They have made me who and what I am, and in a small measure of repay- ment, I would like to dedicate this thesis to my Mother and Father, June and Thomas Earl Akin, and to Mary Bowden, for their help, support, and love. *1 PAGE 6 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction............ ... ............. 9 1.1 A Brief Overview ..... ........ ..... 12 1.2 Thesis Preview .. ..... .. ............... 24 2.0 Flight Mechanics . .. .. .. .. .. ... .... 27 2.1 Introduction .......... .................. .... 27 2.2 Two-Body Analysis ...
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AFSPC-CO TERMINOLOGY Revised: 12 Jan 2019
    AFSPC-CO TERMINOLOGY Revised: 12 Jan 2019 Term Description AEHF Advanced Extremely High Frequency AFB / AFS Air Force Base / Air Force Station AOC Air Operations Center AOI Area of Interest The point in the orbit of a heavenly body, specifically the moon, or of a man-made satellite Apogee at which it is farthest from the earth. Even CAP rockets experience apogee. Either of two points in an eccentric orbit, one (higher apsis) farthest from the center of Apsis attraction, the other (lower apsis) nearest to the center of attraction Argument of Perigee the angle in a satellites' orbit plane that is measured from the Ascending Node to the (ω) perigee along the satellite direction of travel CGO Company Grade Officer CLV Calculated Load Value, Crew Launch Vehicle COP Common Operating Picture DCO Defensive Cyber Operations DHS Department of Homeland Security DoD Department of Defense DOP Dilution of Precision Defense Satellite Communications Systems - wideband communications spacecraft for DSCS the USAF DSP Defense Satellite Program or Defense Support Program - "Eyes in the Sky" EHF Extremely High Frequency (30-300 GHz; 1mm-1cm) ELF Extremely Low Frequency (3-30 Hz; 100,000km-10,000km) EMS Electromagnetic Spectrum Equitorial Plane the plane passing through the equator EWR Early Warning Radar and Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity GBR Ground-Based Radar and Global Broadband Roaming GBS Global Broadcast Service GEO Geosynchronous Earth Orbit or Geostationary Orbit ( ~22,300 miles above Earth) GEODSS Ground-Based Electro-Optical Deep Space Surveillance
    [Show full text]
  • Multisatellite Determination of the Relativistic Electron Phase Space Density at Geosynchronous Orbit: Methodology and Results During Geomagnetically Quiet Times Y
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 110, A10210, doi:10.1029/2004JA010895, 2005 Multisatellite determination of the relativistic electron phase space density at geosynchronous orbit: Methodology and results during geomagnetically quiet times Y. Chen, R. H. W. Friedel, and G. D. Reeves Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA T. G. Onsager NOAA, Boulder, Colorado, USA M. F. Thomsen Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA Received 10 November 2004; revised 20 May 2005; accepted 8 July 2005; published 20 October 2005. [1] We develop and test a methodology to determine the relativistic electron phase space density distribution in the vicinity of geostationary orbit by making use of the pitch-angle resolved energetic electron data from three Los Alamos National Laboratory geosynchronous Synchronous Orbit Particle Analyzer instruments and magnetic field measurements from two GOES satellites. Owing to the Earth’s dipole tilt and drift shell splitting for different pitch angles, each satellite samples a different range of Roederer L* throughout its orbit. We use existing empirical magnetic field models and the measured pitch-angle resolved electron spectra to determine the phase space density as a function of the three adiabatic invariants at each spacecraft. Comparing all satellite measurements provides a determination of the global phase space density gradient over the range L* 6–7. We investigate the sensitivity of this method to the choice of the magnetic field model and the fidelity of the instrument intercalibration in order to both understand and mitigate possible error sources. Results for magnetically quiet periods show that the radial slopes of the density distribution at low energy are positive, while at high energy the slopes are negative, which confirms the results from some earlier studies of this type.
    [Show full text]
  • Positioning: Drift Orbit and Station Acquisition
    Orbits Supplement GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT PERTURBATIONS INFLUENCE OF ASPHERICITY OF THE EARTH: The gravitational potential of the Earth is no longer µ/r, but varies with longitude. A tangential acceleration is created, depending on the longitudinal location of the satellite, with four points of stable equilibrium: two stable equilibrium points (L 75° E, 105° W) two unstable equilibrium points ( 15° W, 162° E) This tangential acceleration causes a drift of the satellite longitude. Longitudinal drift d'/dt in terms of the longitude about a point of stable equilibrium expresses as: (d/dt)2 - k cos 2 = constant Orbits Supplement GEO PERTURBATIONS (CONT'D) INFLUENCE OF EARTH ASPHERICITY VARIATION IN THE LONGITUDINAL ACCELERATION OF A GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE: Orbits Supplement GEO PERTURBATIONS (CONT'D) INFLUENCE OF SUN & MOON ATTRACTION Gravitational attraction by the sun and moon causes the satellite orbital inclination to change with time. The evolution of the inclination vector is mainly a combination of variations: period 13.66 days with 0.0035° amplitude period 182.65 days with 0.023° amplitude long term drift The long term drift is given by: -4 dix/dt = H = (-3.6 sin M) 10 ° /day -4 diy/dt = K = (23.4 +.2.7 cos M) 10 °/day where M is the moon ascending node longitude: M = 12.111 -0.052954 T (T: days from 1/1/1950) 2 2 2 2 cos d = H / (H + K ); i/t = (H + K ) Depending on time within the 18 year period of M d varies from 81.1° to 98.9° i/t varies from 0.75°/year to 0.95°/year Orbits Supplement GEO PERTURBATIONS (CONT'D) INFLUENCE OF SUN RADIATION PRESSURE Due to sun radiation pressure, eccentricity arises: EFFECT OF NON-ZERO ECCENTRICITY L = difference between longitude of geostationary satellite and geosynchronous satellite (24 hour period orbit with e0) With non-zero eccentricity the satellite track undergoes a periodic motion about the subsatellite point at perigee.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design and Optimization of Hybrid Rockets
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021-01-14 Conceptual Design and Optimization of Hybrid Rockets Messinger, Troy Leonard Messinger, T. L. (2021). Conceptual Design and Optimization of Hybrid Rockets (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113011 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Conceptual Design and Optimization of Hybrid Rockets by Troy Leonard Messinger A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2021 © Troy Leonard Messinger 2021 Abstract A framework was developed to perform conceptual multi-disciplinary design parametric and optimization studies of single-stage sub-orbital flight vehicles, and two-stage-to-orbit flight vehicles, that employ hybrid rocket engines as the principal means of propulsion. The framework was written in the Python programming language and incorporates many sub- disciplines to generate vehicle designs, model the relevant physics, and analyze flight perfor- mance. The relative performance (payload fraction capability) of different vehicle masses and feed system/propellant configurations was found. The major findings include conceptually viable pressure-fed and electric pump-fed two-stage-to-orbit configurations taking advan- tage of relatively low combustion pressures in increasing overall performance.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Rockets -Or- Never Leave Geeks Unsupervised
    An Introduction to Rockets -or- Never Leave Geeks Unsupervised Kevin Mellett 27 Apr 2006 2 What is a Rocket? • A propulsion system that contains both oxidizer and fuel • NOT a jet, which requires air for O2 3 A Brief History • 400 BC – Steam Bird • 100 BC – Hero Engine • 100 AD – Gunpowder Invented in China – Celebrations – Religious Ceremonies – Bamboo Misfires? 4 A Brief History • Chinese Invent Fire Arrows 13th c – First True Rockets •16th c Wan-Hu – 47 Rockets 5 A Brief History •13th –16th c Improvements in Technology – English Improved Gunpowder – French Improved Guidance by Shooting Through a Tube “Bazooka Style” – Germans Invented “Step Rockets” (Staging) 6 A Brief History • 1687 Newton Publishes Principia Mathematica 7 Newton’s Third Law MOMENTUM is the key concept of rocketry 8 A Brief History • 1903 KonstantineTsiolkovsky Publishes the “Rocket Equation” – Proposes Liquid Fuel ⎛ Mi ⎞ V = Ve*ln⎜ ⎟ ⎝ Mf ⎠ 9 A Brief History • Goddard Flies the First Liquid Fueled Rocket on 16 Mar 1926 – Theorized Rockets Would Work in a Vacuum – NY Times: Goddard “…lacks the basic physics ladeled out in our high schools…” 10 A Brief History • Germans at Peenemunde – Oberth and von Braun lead development of the V-2 – Amazing achievement, but too late to change the tide of WWII – After WWII, USSR and USA took German Engineers and Hardware 11 Mission Requirements • Launch On Need – No Time for Complex Pre-Launch Preps – Long Shelf Life • Commercial / Government – Risk Tolerance –R&D Costs 12 Mission Requirements • Payload Mass and Orbital Objectives – How much do you need, and where do you want it? Both drive energy requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Dalbello Vice President, Legal and Government Affairs Intelsat General
    Commercial Management of the Space Environment Richard DalBello Vice President, Legal and Government Affairs Intelsat General The commercial satellite industry has billions of dollars of assets in space and relies on this unique environment for the development and growth of its business. As a result, safety and the sustainment of the space environment are two of the satellite industry‘s highest priorities. In this paper I would like to provide a quick survey of past and current industry space traffic control practices and to discuss a few key initiatives that the industry is developing in this area. Background The commercial satellite industry has been providing essential space services for almost as long as humans have been exploring space. Over the decades, this industry has played an active role in developing technology, worked collaboratively to set standards, and partnered with government to develop successful international regulatory regimes. Success in both commercial and government space programs has meant that new demands are being placed on the space environment. This has resulted in orbital crowding, an increase in space debris, and greater demand for limited frequency resources. The successful management of these issues will require a strong partnership between government and industry and the careful, experience-based expansion of international law and diplomacy. Throughout the years, the satellite industry has never taken for granted the remarkable environment in which it works. Industry has invested heavily in technology and sought out the best and brightest minds to allow the full, but sustainable exploitation of the space environment. Where problems have arisen, such as space debris or electronic interference, industry has taken 1 the initiative to deploy new technologies and adopt new practices to minimize negative consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • GEO, MEO, and LEO How Orbital Altitude Impacts Network Performance in Satellite Data Services
    GEO, MEO, AND LEO How orbital altitude impacts network performance in satellite data services COMMUNICATION OVER SATELLITE “An entire multi-orbit is now well accepted as a key enabler across the telecommunications industry. Satellite networks can supplement existing infrastructure by providing global reach satellite ecosystem is where terrestrial networks are unavailable or not feasible. opening up above us, But not all satellite networks are created equal. Providers offer different solutions driving new opportunities depending on the orbits available to them, and so understanding how the distance for high-performance from Earth affects performance is crucial for decision making when selecting a satellite service. The following pages give an overview of the three main orbit gigabit connectivity and classes, along with some of the principal trade-offs between them. broadband services.” Stewart Sanders Executive Vice President of Key terms Technology at SES GEO – Geostationary Earth Orbit. NGSO – Non-Geostationary Orbit. NGSO is divided into MEO and LEO. MEO – Medium Earth Orbit. LEO – Low Earth Orbit. HTS – High Throughput Satellites designed for communication. Latency – the delay in data transmission from one communication endpoint to another. Latency-critical applications include video conferencing, mobile data backhaul, and cloud-based business collaboration tools. SD-WAN – Software-Defined Wide Area Networking. Based on policies controlled by the user, SD-WAN optimises network performance by steering application traffic over the most suitable access technology and with the appropriate Quality of Service (QoS). Figure 1: Schematic of orbital altitudes and coverage areas GEOSTATIONARY EARTH ORBIT Altitude 36,000km GEO satellites match the rotation of the Earth as they travel, and so remain above the same point on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockets of the Future? the Gravity Problem
    ©JSR 2011/2013/2015/2018 Rockets Rockets of the Future? The gravity problem Rockets were designed and built for centuries to project things horizontally over a greater range than could be achieved mechanically. Often it was gunpowder that was delivered; sometimes things like a crew rescue line to a boat swept onto shoreline rocks. Even the German V1 and V2 rockets of WWII were horizontal projection technology. All that changed after WWII and now rockets are first and foremost associated with space exploration and travel. Military rockets with their implied intentional destruction are usually called ‘missiles’. Rockets built for space launches are huge constructions. Stand near to one and it towers skyward as high as a 15 story tower block. ESA’s ‘Ariane 5’ is 50 m high and weighs over 750 tonnes; the Russian ‘Proton’ satellite launcher is a comparable height and a little lighter at 690 tonnes; the Soyuz-FG used for taking astronauts to the ISS (International Space Station) is also about 50 m but ‘only’ about 300 tonnes, having less height to reach; the USA’s Atlas V rocket is 58 m tall and weighs in at 330 tonnes; the Indian space agency’s own rocket that has put a satellite in geostationary orbit is 50 m tall and has a mass of 435 tonnes. You get the picture. Think of the biggest lorry you’ve seen on public roads, fully laden. It’s got a pretty big engine just to pull it along. Imagine the engine that would be required to lift the whole thing into the air and keep lifting it upwards, kilometre after kilometre.
    [Show full text]
  • NEP Paper World Space Congress
    IAC-02-S.4.02 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR A NUCLEAR ELECTRIC PROPULSION SYSTEM Larry Kos In-Space Technical Lead Engineer NASA Marshall Space Flight Center MSFC, Alabama, 35812 (USA) E-mail: [email protected] Les Johnson In-Space Transportation Technology Manager Advanced Space Transportation Program/TD15 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center MSFC, Alabama, 35812, (USA) E-mail: [email protected] Jonathan Jones Aerospace Engineer NASA Marshall Space Flight Center MSFC, Alabama, 35812 (USA) E-mail: [email protected] Ann Trausch Mission and System Analysis Lead NASA Marshall Space Flight Center MSFC, Alabama 35812 (USA) E-mail: [email protected] Bill Eberle Aerospace Engineer Gray Research Inc. Huntsville, Alabama 35806 (USA) E-mail: [email protected] Gordon Woodcock Technical Consultant Gray Research Inc. Huntsville, Alabama 35806 (USA) E-mail: [email protected] NASA is developing propulsion technologies potentially leading to the implementation of a nuclear electric propulsion system supporting robotic exploration of the solar system. The mission limitations imposed by the use of today’s predominantly chemical propulsion systems are many: long trip times, minimal science payload mass, minimal power at the destination for science, and the near-impossibility of encountering multiple targets or even orbiting distant destinations. Performance-based mission analysis, comparing a first generation nuclear electric propulsion system with chemical and solar electric propulsion was performed and will be described in the paper. Mission Characteristics and Challenges ________________ Copyright © 2002 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Europa Lander Astronautics, Inc. No copyright is asserted in the United States under Title 17, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Space Elevator Technology
    Analysis of Space Elevator Technology SPRING 2014, ASEN 5053 FINAL PROJECT TYSON SPARKS Contents Figures .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Tables ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Analysis of Space Elevator Technology ........................................................................................................................ 2 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 I. Introduction and Theory ....................................................................................................................................... 2 A. Modern Elevator Concept ................................................................................................................................. 2 B. Climber Concept ............................................................................................................................................... 3 C. Base Station Concept ........................................................................................................................................ 4 D. Space Elevator Astrodynamics ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FCC FACT SHEET* Streamlining Licensing Procedures for Small Satellites Report and Order, IB Docket No
    FCC FACT SHEET* Streamlining Licensing Procedures for Small Satellites Report and Order, IB Docket No. 18-86 Background: The Commission’s part 25 satellite licensing rules, primarily used by commercial systems, group satellites into two general categories—geostationary-satellite orbit systems and non-geostationary-satellite orbit (NGSO) systems—for purposes of application processing. The Commission’s satellite licensing rules, in particular those applicable to commercial operations, were generally not developed with small satellite systems in mind, and uniformly impose fees and regulatory requirements appropriate to expensive, long-lived missions. However, the Commission has recognized that smaller, less expensive satellites, known colloquially as “small satellites” or “small sats,” have gained popularity among satellite operators, including for commercial operations. Therefore, in 2018, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that proposed to develop a new authorization process tailored specifically to small satellite operations, keeping in mind efficient use of spectrum and mitigation of orbital debris. What the Report and Order Would Do: • Create an alternative, optional application process within part 25 of the Commission’s rules for small satellites. This streamlined process would be an addition to, and not replace, the existing processes for satellite authorization under parts 5 (experimental), 25, and 97 (amateur) of the Commission’s rules. • This new streamlined application process could be used by applicants for satellites and satellite systems meeting certain qualifying characteristics, such as: . 10 or fewer satellites under a single authorization. Total in-orbit lifetime of satellite(s) of six years or less. Maximum individual satellite wet mass of 180 kg. Propulsion capabilities or deployment below 600 km altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Launch Rate and Payload Capabilities
    Aerial Launch Vehicles: Increasing Launch Rate and Payload Capabilities Yves Tscheuschner1 and Alec B. Devereaux2 University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado Two of man's greatest achievements have been the first flight at Kitty Hawk and pushing into the final frontier that is space. Air launch systems aim to combine these great achievements into a revolutionary way to deliver satellites, cargo and eventually people into space. Launching from an aircraft has many advantages, including the ability to launch at any inclination and from above bad weather, which could delay ground launches. While many concepts for launching rockets from an airplane have been developed, very few have made it past the drawing board. Only the Pegasus and, to a lesser extent, SpaceShipOne have truly shown the feasibility of such a system. However, a recent push for rapid, small payload to orbit launches by the military and a general need for cheaper, heavy lift options are leading to an increasing interest in air launch methods. In order for the efficiency and flexibility of the system to be realized, however, additional funding and research are necessary. Nomenclature ALASA = airborne launch assist space access ALS = air launch system DARPA = defense advanced research project agency LEO = low Earth orbit LOX = liquid oxygen RP-1 = rocket propellant 1 MAKS = Russian air launch system MECO = main engine cutoff SS1 = space ship one SS2 = space ship two I. Introduction W hat typically comes to mind when considering launching people or satellites to space are the towering rocket poised on the launch pad. These images are engraved in the minds of both the public and scientists alike.
    [Show full text]