Authorities Are Responsible for the Death of Prisoners in Custody

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Authorities Are Responsible for the Death of Prisoners in Custody www.fidh.org Iran 14 June 2011 Iran: Authorities are responsible for the death of prisoners in custody Following the death of Mr Hoda Saber, testimony of his fellow prisoners reveals the direct responsibility of the authorities. Karim Lahidji, Vice-president of International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and President of the Iranian League for the Defence of Human Rights (LDDHI), said today: "The demise of Hoda Saber in Evin Prison is another sign of the looming human catastrophe in Iranian prisons. The conditions in those prisons are by far below the international standards and are deteriorating day by day. The authorities are responsible for the safety and lives of all prisoners, but they have consistently failed to treat prisoners - in particular the prisoners of conscience - fairly and humanely. Most prisoners are denied proper and adequate medical and health care. Experts of the Lyon-based International Observatory of Prisons have been asking unsuccessfully to visit the Iranian prisons for several years. The international community should persuade the Iranian authorities to open the prisons to such visits." Reports from Iran indicate that another political prisoner, Mr. Hoda Saber died in custody in Evin Prison, in Tehran, on 10 June 2011, after a week of hunger strike in protest to the death of Haleh Sahabi who had died as a result of an attack by securityagents. In a testimony published on 13 June, 64 political prisoners - all Mr Saber's fellow prisoners - declared that after feeling of pain in his chest and digestive disorders, "Hoda Saber was taken to Evin Prison's clinic at 4 am on Friday 10th June, but was returned after two hours, while he was still writhing in pain and saying that he had been beaten up and insulted in the clinic." Following the deterioration of his conditions and his complaints of having diarrhoea and nausea, he was taken away again on a stretcher a couple of hours later and died under unclear conditions on the same day. Hoda Saber (born 1960), a journalist and political activist, had been detained several times during the past decade and spent long periods in prison, ranging from several months to two years. At the time of his demise, he had been in detention since 24 July 2010. Over the past couple of decades, numerous Iranian prisoners have died in custody as a result of torture and other forms of ill treatment, denial of medical care, negligence of prison authorities and a possibly deliberate policy of getting rid of certain political prisoners. The following are some of the Iranian prisoners of conscience and political prisoners who have lost their lives in custody over the past decade, but the list is by no means exhaustive: Copyright © FIDH - Human Rights for All Page 1/2 www.fidh.org • Zahra Kazemi (f), Iranian-Canadian photojournalist, died as a result of blows to her skull in Evin Prison, in July 2003. • Ali Batrani, an Iranian Arab, died during demonstrations in Ahvaz (Khuzestan), in April 2005. • Akbar Mohammadi, a student activist, died in Evin Prison, in July 2006. • Valiollah Feyz-Mahdavi, a political prisoner, died in Evin Prison, in September 2006. • Zahra Baniyaghoub (f) (a.k.a Zahra Bani-Ameri), a medical graduate from Tehran University, died in a detention centre in Hamedan, after being detained with her fiancé by the morality police, in October 2007. • Ebrahim Lotfollahi, a young Kurdish law student, died in Sanandaj Prison, in January 2008. • Abdolreza Rajabi, a political prisoner, died in Rejaieshahr Prison, in October 2008. • Amir Hossein Heshmat-Saran, a political activist, died after he was transferred to hospital from Rajaieshahr Prison, in March 2009. • Omidreza Mirsayafi, a blogger, died in Evin prison, March 2009 • At least three detainees, Amir Javadifar, Mohsen Ruholamini and Mohammad Kamrani, died in the extremely non-standard Kahrizak Detention Centre in summer 2009, while some others died after release as a result of torture and other ill treatment they had suffered in that detention centre. • Gholam-Reza Bayat, a young Kurdish man, died in Kamyaran, in August 2010, after being beaten up in custody. FIDH Iran Page: http://www.fidh.org/-Iran,228- http://www.fidh.org/Iran-Authorities-are-responsible-for-the-death-of Copyright © FIDH - Human Rights for All Page 2/2.
Recommended publications
  • IRAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY the Islamic Republic of Iran
    IRAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is a constitutional, theocratic republic in which Shia Muslim clergy and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate the key power structures. Government legitimacy is based on the twin pillars of popular sovereignty--albeit restricted--and the rule of the supreme leader of the Islamic Revolution. The current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was chosen by a directly elected body of religious leaders, the Assembly of Experts, in 1989. Khamenei’s writ dominates the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. He directly controls the armed forces and indirectly controls internal security forces, the judiciary, and other key institutions. The legislative branch is the popularly elected 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly, or Majlis. The unelected 12-member Guardian Council reviews all legislation the Majlis passes to ensure adherence to Islamic and constitutional principles; it also screens presidential and Majlis candidates for eligibility. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was reelected president in June 2009 in a multiparty election that was generally considered neither free nor fair. There were numerous instances in which elements of the security forces acted independently of civilian control. Demonstrations by opposition groups, university students, and others increased during the first few months of the year, inspired in part by events of the Arab Spring. In February hundreds of protesters throughout the country staged rallies to show solidarity with protesters in Tunisia and Egypt. The government responded harshly to protesters and critics, arresting, torturing, and prosecuting them for their dissent. As part of its crackdown, the government increased its oppression of media and the arts, arresting and imprisoning dozens of journalists, bloggers, poets, actors, filmmakers, and artists throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting 15.11.2011 B7-0598/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for the debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 122 of the Rules of Procedure on Iran - recent cases of human rights violations Véronique De Keyser, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Kathleen Van Brempt, Pino Arlacchi, Corina Creţu, Kristian Vigenin on behalf of the S&D Group RE\P7_B(2011)0598_EN.doc PE472.810v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B7-0598/2011 European Parliament resolution on Iran - recent cases of human rights violations The European Parliament, - having regard to its previous resolutions on Iran, notably those concerning human rights and, in particular, those of February 2010 and January 2011, - having regard to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to all of which Iran is a party, - having regard to Rule 122(5) of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas the multi-faceted human rights crisis is gripping Iran, including the persecution and prosecution of civil society actors, political activists, journalists, students, artists, lawyers, and environmental activists; as well as the routine denial of freedom of assembly, women’s rights, the rights of religious and ethnic minorities, and the skyrocketing rates of executions; B. whereas recent deaths of two human rights defenders, Haleh Sahabi and Hoda Saber, for which the officials were responsible, illustrate the existential threats to jailed human rights defenders and dissidents in Iran; C.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran. Une Élection Contestée, Une Répression Accrue
    IRAN UNE ÉLECTION CONTESTÉE, UNE RÉPRESSION ACCRUE Amnesty International est un mouvement mondial regroupant 2,2 millions de personnes qui défendent les droits humains et luttent contre les atteintes à ces droits dans plus de 150 pays et territoires. La vision d’Amnesty International est celle d’un monde où chacun peut se prévaloir de tous les droits énoncés dans la Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme et dans d’autres textes internationaux. Essentiellement financée par ses membres et les dons de particuliers, Amnesty International est indépendante de tout gouvernement, de toute tendance politique, de toute puissance économique et de toute croyance religieuse. Amnesty International Publications Publié pour la première fois en 2009 par Amnesty International Publications Secrétariat international Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street Londres WC1X 0DW Royaume-Uni www.amnesty.org © Amnesty International Publications 2009 Index : MDE 13/123/2009 L’édition originale a été publiée en langue anglaise Imprimé par Amnesty International, Secrétariat international, Londres, Royaume-Uni Tous droits réservés. Cette publication, qui est protégée par le droit d'auteur, peut être reproduite gratuitement, par quelque procédé que ce soit, à des fins de sensibilisation, de campagne ou d'enseignement, mais pas à des fins commerciales. Les titulaires des droits d'auteur demandent à être informés de toute utilisation de ce document afin d’en évaluer l’impact. Toute reproduction dans d'autres circonstances, ou réutilisation dans d'autres publications, ou traduction, ou adaptation nécessitent l'autorisation écrite préalable des éditeurs, qui pourront exiger le paiement d'un droit. Photo de couverture : Des centaines de milliers de personnes manifestant sur Azadi (Place de la Liberté), à Téhéran, contre les résultats de l’élection présidentielle, le 15 juin 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 28, 2005
    Iran Page 1 of 20 Iran Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2004 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 28, 2005 The Islamic Republic of Iran [note 1] is a constitutional, theocratic republic in which Shi'a Muslim clergy dominate the key power structures. Article Four of the Constitution states that "All laws and regulations…shall be based on Islamic principles." Government legitimacy is based on the twin pillars of popular sovereignty (Article Six) and the rule of the Supreme Jurisconsulate (Article Five). The unelected Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ali Khamene'i, dominates a tricameral division of power among legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Khamene'i directly controls the armed forces and exercises indirect control over the internal security forces, the judiciary, and other key institutions. The executive branch was headed by President Mohammad Khatami, who won a second 4-year term in June 2001, with 77 percent of the popular vote in a multiparty election. The legislative branch featured a popularly elected 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly, Majlis, which develops and passes legislation, and an unelected 12-member Council of Guardians, which reviews all legislation passed by the Majlis for adherence to Islamic and constitutional principles and also has the duty of screening Majlis candidates for eligibility. Conservative candidates won a majority of seats in the February Seventh Majlis election that was widely perceived as neither free nor fair, due to the Council of Guardians' exclusion of thousands of qualified candidates. The 34-member Expediency Council is empowered to resolve legislative impasses between the Council of Guardians and the Majlis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Econo-Political Banckruptcy of the Supreme-Leader-Installed
    Tudeh News International Bulletin of the Tudeh Party of Iran– June 2011 - No. 272 International Dept. Address: BM Box 1686 London WC1N 3XX Fax: (Berlin: 324-1627) (London: 208 -392 2653) e-mail:[email protected] - URL: http://www.tudehpartyiran.org and magnificent popular movement that Two years after the election coup came to the scene to protest against this anti- The Econo-Political national and violent coup not only wrecked the plots and plans of the perpetrators of the Bankruptcy of the coup to “calm down the situation” and Supreme-Leader-Installed “political stabilization” of the regime, but also proved that despite a four-year Government repression by the Ahmadinejad government, (Abridged from "Nameh Mardom", Central Organ of the anti-despotism and powerful social the Tudeh Party of Iran, No. 870, 6th June, 11) movement is still alive in the society. une 12th of 2011 marks the second The bloody and harsh suppression of the anniversary of the election coup popular protests against the infringement of J perpetrated by the Supreme [Religious] the votes of millions of citizens, which led Leader and the security and Guard forces to killing and injuring a large number of against the will of millions of Iranians who cast people and the arrest of thousands of their votes in the hopes of changing the anti- freedom campaigners, although could people and reactionary government of impede the widespread protests and street Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. During the past two demonstrations against the regime, but could years, tons of witness documents and data have not subdue the freedom movement and drive been released and made public about the extent it into isolation as the regime leader would of the election rigging orchestrated by the have imagined.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Events in Iran, May 2004*
    Chronology of Events in Iran, May 2004* May 1 Three Iranian dissidents given week's leave from prison. (Islamic Republic News Agency / IRNA) Three members of a dissident Iranian group, who are held for acting against the Islamic Republic, have been granted temporary leave. Taqi Rahmani, Reza Alijani and Hoda Saber, members of the so-called religious-nationalist group, were granted a one-week leave from Evin prison by Tehran general and revolutionary court, the head of the court's public relations office, Mohammad Shadabi said. Rahmani faces 11 years in prison, while Saber has been given nine years and Alijani six years. They were among a group of 14 dissidents who received their punishment from the Revolutionary Court in May 2003 for attempting to topple the Islamic establishment. May 2 Iranian judiciary allows four dissidents to go on leave. (Agence France-Presse / AFP) Iranian judiciary authorities allowed seven prominent dissidents jailed for speaking out against the regime and students jailed during unrest in 1999 to go on leave. According to the paper, Akbar Ganji, who was jailed in 2000 after he alleged top regime officials were behind a spate of grisly serial murders of dissidents, was given seven days of leave. Ahmad Batebi, Nasser Zarafshan and Akbar Mohammadi were each given five days out of prison. Batebi had been initially condemned to death for his participation in the demonstration in 1999 where he was featured on a famous photograph holding aloft a blood-soaked T-shirt. His sentence was revised to 13 years imprisonment. In August 2002, Zarafshan, a prominent lawyer was sentenced to five years in prison and 50 lashes for "distributing secret information".
    [Show full text]
  • Asamblea General Distr
    Naciones Unidas A/66/374 Asamblea General Distr. general 23 de septiembre de 2011 Español Original: inglés Sexagésimo sexto período de sesiones Tema 69 c) del programa Promoción y protección de los derechos humanos: situaciones de los derechos humanos e informes de relatores y representantes especiales La situación de los derechos humanos en la República Islámica del Irán Nota del Secretario General Resumen El Secretario General tiene el honor de transmitir a los miembros de la Asamblea General el informe del Relator Especial sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en la República Islámica del Irán, Ahmed Shaheed, presentado de conformidad con la resolución del Consejo de Derechos Humanos 16/9. El Relator Especial asumió oficialmente su cargo el 1 de agosto de 2011 y ya entonces notificó a la Secretaría que, debido su nombramiento tardío, no estaría en condiciones de presentar un informe sustantivo, pero que, en su lugar, centraría todos sus esfuerzos en presentar la metodología propuesta y en describir la evolución de la situación de los derechos humanos en la República Islámica del Irán. Esto haría hincapié en la necesidad de que exista una mayor transparencia y cooperación por parte de la República Islámica del Irán. 11-51221 (S) 051011 131011 *1151221* A/66/374 Informe del Relator Especial sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en la República Islámica del Irán Índice Página I. Introducción................................................................. 3 II. Metodología de trabajo propuesta ............................................... 4 III. Situación de los derechos humanos .............................................. 6 A. Trato dispensado a los agentes de la sociedad civil ............................. 8 1. Activistas políticos................................................... 8 2. Periodistas.........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic
    Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Robert J. Bookmiller Gulf Research Center i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Dubai, United Arab Emirates (_}A' !_g B/9lu( s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ *_D |w@_> TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B uG_GAE#­'c`}A' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB9f1s{5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'cAE/ i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBª E#'Gvp*E#'B!v,¢#'E#'1's{5%­''tDu{xC)/_9%_(n{wGL­i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uAc8mBmA' , ¡dA'E#'c>EuA'&_{3A'B¢#'c}{3'(E#'c j{w*E#'cGuG{y*E#'c A"'E#'c CEudA%'eC_@c {3EE#'{4¢#_(9_,ud{3' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBB`{wB¡}.0%'9{ymA'E/B`d{wA'¡>ismd{wd{3 *4#/b_dA{w{wdA'¡A_A'?uA' k pA'v@uBuCc,E9)1Eu{zA_(u`*­E @1_{xA'!'1"'9u`*1's{5%­''tD¡>)/1'==A'uA'f_,E i_m(#ÆA Gulf Research Center 187 Oud Metha Tower, 11th Floor, 303 Sheikh Rashid Road, P. O. Box 80758, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Tel.: +971 4 324 7770 Fax: +971 3 324 7771 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.grc.ae First published 2009 i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Gulf Research Center (_}A' !_g B/9lu( Dubai, United Arab Emirates s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ © Gulf Research Center 2009 *_D All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in |w@_> a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Gulf Research Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran COI Compilation September 2013
    Iran COI Compilation September 2013 ACCORD is co-funded by the European Refugee Fund, UNHCR and the Ministry of the Interior, Austria. Commissioned by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Division of International Protection. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author. ACCORD - Austrian Centre for Country of Origin & Asylum Research and Documentation Iran COI Compilation September 2013 This report serves the specific purpose of collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. It is not intended to be a general report on human rights conditions. The report is prepared on the basis of publicly available information, studies and commentaries within a specified time frame. All sources are cited and fully referenced. This report is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Every effort has been made to compile information from reliable sources; users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. © Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD An electronic version of this report is available on www.ecoi.net. Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD Wiedner Hauptstraße 32 A- 1040 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43 1 58 900 – 582 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.redcross.at/accord ACCORD is co-funded by the European Refugee Fund, UNHCR and the Ministry of the Interior, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • FIDH Briefing Note
    To the COHOM members Paris, 15 September 2003 Re : EU/Iran human rights dialogue – third session Dear Members of the Cohom, The present briefing note has been elaborated in view of the third session of the EU/Iran Human Rights dialogue. That session was supposed to take place in Tehran on 15 and 16 September. It has been postponed at the moment, at the request of the EU, apparently because of the opposition of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the participation of certain international NGOs. The FIDH wishes however to transmit you the present contribution (also made public) in order to show the absence of progress with regard to the situation of human rights in Iran, since the inception of the dialogue one year ago. In advance of the decision by the EU to engage in a human rights dialogue with Iran, the FIDH transmitted a note to the EU stressing the main human rights issues1. The FIDH considers that the flaws raised one year ago are still valid : no significant progress have been accomplished with regard to the death penalty and other inhuman and degrading treatments, the status of ethnic and religious minorities, the unfair trials, the repression of human rights defenders, lawyers and journalists and women rights. However, the UN Working Group on arbitrary detention has been able to visit Iran last February and the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination examined the situation in Iran last August. The FIDH welcomes cooperation by Iran with those two mechanisms but insists on the necessity to implement their recommendations in order to make such a cooperation meaningful.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran: Second Anniversary of Neda Agha Soltan's Killing Highlights Near
    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC STATEMENT 20 June 2011 AI Index: MDE 13/061/2011 Iran: Second anniversary of Neda Agha Soltan’s killing highlights near-total impunity for officials Two years after the death of Neda Agha Soltan was captured on a mobile phone and came to symbolize the brutal repression meted out by security forces after the disputed presidential election of 2009, Amnesty International is renewing its call on the Iranian authorities to end impunity for officials responsible for unlawful killings, torture and other human rights violations. Footage of Neda Agha Soltan’s dying moments, after being shot in the chest on 20 June 2009 spread around the world via the internet. No one has ever been brought to justice for her death, and instead of investigating it impartially, the Iranian authorities – following an entrenched pattern of cover-up of abuses – resorted to threats, counter-accusations, obfuscation and further violations to try to evade responsibility. A member of the Basij militia witnessed by onlookers as saying, “I did not mean to kill her”, whose ID card was posted on the internet, has never been put on trial, but appeared in a documentary shown a year ago on state television, denying responsibility. Arash Hejazi, the doctor who was present at the scene, was forced to seek asylum abroad, fearing for his safety. Neda Agha Soltan’s family and friends were made to appear on state televison denying the state was responsible, although her father Ali Agha Soltan told BBC Persian in December 2009 that “her killer can only be from the government”.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 2012 Human Rights Report
    IRAN 2012 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is a theocratic republic established after the 1979 adoption of a constitution by popular referendum. The constitution, amended in 1989, created a political system based on the concept in Shia Islam of velayat-e faqih, the “guardianship of the jurist” or “rule by the jurisprudent.” Shia clergy and political leaders vetted by the clergy, many of which are increasingly associated with the country’s security forces, dominate key power structures. The “leader of the revolution” (or supreme leader) is chosen by a popularly elected body of 86 clerics, the Assembly of Experts, and directly controls the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government, as well as the armed forces. The supreme leader also indirectly controls internal security forces and other key institutions. Since 1989 the supreme leader has been Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The March 2 legislative elections for the 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly were generally considered neither free nor fair. Civilian authorities failed at times to maintain effective control over the security forces. The government continued its crackdown on civil society, which intensified after the disputed 2009 presidential elections. The government and its security forces pressured, intimidated, and arrested journalists, students, lawyers, artists, women, ethnic and religious activists, and members of their families. The judiciary continued to harshly punish, imprison, or detain without charges human rights activists, members of the political opposition, and persons linked to reform movements. The government significantly increased its surveillance and monitoring of citizens’ online activities by blocking or filtering content and detaining numerous Internet users for content posted online.
    [Show full text]