Report Name:COVID-19 Found on Additional Dutch Mink Farms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report Name:COVID-19 Found on Additional Dutch Mink Farms Voluntary Report – Voluntary - Public Distribution Date: June 02,2020 Report Number: NL2020-0024 Report Name: COVID-19 Found on Additional Dutch Mink Farms Country: Netherlands Post: The Hague Report Category: Agricultural Situation, Agriculture in the News, Livestock and Products Prepared By: FAS/The Hague Staff Approved By: Christopher Riker Report Highlights: Since late April, six mink farms at eight locations in the Netherlands have identified mink infected with the coronavirus (COVID-19). These farms are in the municipalities of Gemert-Bakel/Milheez, Laarbeek, Deurne, De Mortel, and Sint Anthonis. There is also a suspected infection at a mink farm in Venray. Control measures were immediately imposed on the infected mink farms after the first detections were made. Measures were later expanded to cover all mink farms in the Netherlands. The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment assesses the risk of human exposure to the virus outside the mink house as negligible. The government awaits the expert opinion of an Outbreak Management Team, but has noted that all conceivable measures will be considered, including the possibility of clearing the infected mink farms. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Background Two mink farms, located in Gemert-Bakel/Milheeze (home to 13,000 mink) and Laarbeek (home to 7,500 mink) in North Brabant province, detected coronavirus (COVID-19) in mink in late April. The mink showed various symptoms including respiratory and gastrointestinal problems. Investigations were launched to determine the source of the infections. Because some employees had COVID-19 symptoms at both farms, it was assumed that people infected the animals. The initial testing results indicated that no virus was found in the air samples outside the mink house, but the virus was found in dust particle samples taken in the immediate vicinity of mink in the house. In early May, two additional mink farms, located in Deurne (home to 1,500 mink) and De Mortel (home to 10,000 mink) in North Brabant province, were found to have COVID-19 infections. In response, the same mitigation protocols were implemented, and investigations were initiated. The Ministry reported that human-to-animal transmission does not seem to have been the only cause of the virus at these farms– noting the virus characteristics indicate transmission between mink as well.1 Accordingly, nearby mink farms began the process of screening animals through blood tests to see if any additional animals in the region had been infected. For additional information, see NL2020-0016: COVID-19 Found on Dutch Mink Farms. Based on research conducted by the Dutch government, it was subsequently determined that mink which were infected with COVID-19 on two Dutch farms may have transmitted the virus to farm employees. The relevant study also showed that mink can have the virus without showing any disease symptoms. Based on these developments, the Minister of Agriculture, Nature, and Food Quality and the Minister of Health, Welfare, and Sport implemented a number of additional control measures. For additional information, see NL2020-0019: Additional Control Measures for Dutch Mink Industry In Response to COVID-19. On May 19, 2020, the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport also mandated that Dutch mink farms subject the carcasses of naturally dead animals to laboratory testing for the presence of COVID-19, and provide blood samples to test for the presence of COVID-19 antibodies. Additional Findings COVID-19 infections were subsequently found among carcasses from three additional mink farms in the Netherlands (two companies in Sint Anthonis, North Brabant and another in Gemert-Bakel, North Brabant). A fourth company (in Venray, Limburg) is also suspected, but further investigation is ongoing. As a result, the control measures outlined in NL2020-0019 have been imposed on all four of these farms as well. The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) continues to assess the risk to local residents as negligible, and indicates that proper use of personal protective equipment in the mink house of an infected farm can prevent infection among employees. Next Steps If there is a cross-regional outbreak of infectious disease in the Netherlands, or if there is an international threat of infectious disease, the RIVM can convene an Outbreak Management Team (OMT). An OMT develops an advisory report for the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. The OMT 1 The investigation did not identify virus in the dust particles in the air inside or outside the mink houses on these farms. looking into the ongoing detections of COVID-19 at Dutch mink farms has been asked to include these new results in its advice to the government. The OMT is determining what the risk is that COVID-19 will continue to circulate among infected mink farms and if the disease could eventually become a permanent source of re-infection among humans and animals. Various options are now being prepared in advance of the OMT’s advice, with priority being placed on ensuring public health. The Dutch government has reported that all conceivable measures will be considered, including the possibility of clearing the infected mink farms. Attachments: June 1 Letter to House of Represenatives from Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (in Dutch).pdf.
Recommended publications
  • Jaaroverzicht Ondermijning Basisteam Maas En Leijgraaf 2020
    Jaaroverzicht ondermijning basisteam Maas en Leijgraaf 2020 geen 1x Grave Grave 0 Landerd 4x Landerd1 Cuijk Cuijk 4 Mill en Sint Hubert 0 Uden 5 1x 3x 2x Sint Anthonis 0 Boekel 1 + 3x Boxmeer 1 1x geen geen 12 4 4 4 3+ casussen informatiefase uitvoeringsfase afgesloten nieuw in 2020 Thema’s in de casussen 2020 1 syndru 2 mensenhandel witwassen hennep € 5 4 Jaaroverzicht ondermijning basisteam Maas en Leijgraaf 2020 Gemeentelijke cijfers Sluitingen 13b Toepassingen BIBOB Extra voorwaarden Landelijk Bureau Bibob Waarschuwing 13b* Vergunning geweigerd/ingetrokkenaan vergunning Boekel 2 1 2 Cuijk 1 3 16 Grave 1 9 1 1 Landerd 4 3 2 3 Mill en Sint Hubert 1 2 10 2 Sint Anthonis 2 2 5 Boxmeer 1 8 11 Uden 3 13 11 Totaal M&L 9 32 67 2 7 3 *alle 8 gemeenten hebben uniform 13b beleid Inzet bestuurlijke bevoegdheden in de aanpak van ondermijning Uit onderstaande blijkt dat de gemeenten meer gebruik mogen/kunnen maken van de bestuurlijke be- voegdheden die ingezet kunnen worden in de aanpak van ondermijning. Uit onderstaand overzicht valt op te maken dat meer gebruik gemaakt mag worden van bestuurlijke bevoegdheden die ingezet kunnen worden in de aanpak van ondermijning. Bezocht object RIEC casus Bezocht object overig Opgelegde dwangsommenVerbeurde dwangsommenOpgelegde last Uitgevoerdeonder bestuursdwang lastGemeentelijke incasso onder bestuursdwang Boekel 5 Cuijk 2 7 Grave 3 Landerd 7 7 Mill en St. Hubert 2 Sint Anthonis 9 Boxmeer 10 3 Uden 16 22 Totaal M&L 35 56 0 0 0 0 0 Jaaroverzicht ondermijning basisteam Maas en Leijgraaf 2020 Politionele cijfers
    [Show full text]
  • VERSPREIDINGSGEBIED HUIS AAN HUISKRANTEN Regio Noord
    Schiermonnikoog Ameland Eemsmond Terschelling De Marne Dongeradeel Loppersum Appingedam Ferwerderadeel Winsum Delfzijl Bedum Kollummerland C.A. Ten Boer Het Bildt Dantumadeel Zuidhorn Leeuwarderadeel Slochteren Groningen Achtkarspelen Grootegast Vlieland Oldambt Menaldumadeel Tytsjerksteradeel Franekeradeel Leek Menterwolde Harlingen Hoogezand-Sappemeer Haren Leeuwaden Marum Littenseradiel Smallingerland Bellingwedde Tynaarlo Veendam Pekela Texel Noordenveld Opsterland Aa en Hunze Assen Stadskanaal Súdwest-Fryslan Vlagtwedde Ooststellingwerf Heerenveen De Friese Meren Den Helder Borger-Odoorn Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Westerveld Hollands Kroon Schagen Steenwijkerland Emmen Coevorden Meppel De Wolden Hoogeveen Medemblik Opmeer Enk- Stede huizen Noordoostpolder Heerhugo- Broec Langedijk waard Urk Bergen Drechterland Hoorn Staphorst Koggenland Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Heiloo Alkmaar Kampen Castricum Beemster Ommen Zeevang Dalfsen Uitgeest Dronten Zwolle Heemskerk Edam Wormerland Purmerend Lelystad Beverwijk Hattem Twenterand Oldebroek Zaanstad Oost- Lands- zaan meer Tubbergen Velsen Waterland Elburg Heerde Raalte Bloemen- Hellendoorn daal Haarlemmer- Dinkelland liede C.A. Olst-Wijhe Almelo Haarlem Amsterdam Almere Nunspeet Wierden Zand- Zeewolde Harderwijk Epe voort Heem- Borne stede Diemen Oldenzaal Muiden Losser Rijssen-Holten Haarlemmermeer Weesp Hille- Ouder- Naarden Huizen Ermelo Hengelo gom Amstel Deventer Amstel- Blari- veen Bussum Noord- Abcoude cum Putten wijker- Lisse Aalsmeer Laren Eemnes Hof van Twente Enschede hout Bunschoten
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome in Beek En Donk, Greenest Village of the Netherlands! Laarbeek: Waterport of the Peel
    Green Welcome in Beek en Donk, greenest village of theConnects! Netherlands! Laarbeek: Waterport of the Peel. Index A green area abounding in water, with many Welcome in Beek en Donk outdoor activities and a rich social life. We are proud of all volunteers and organiza- Welcome in Beek en Donk 2 tions that helped us creating a green and Beek en Donk is a village, part of the municipality Laarbeek and located liveable Laarbeek. Together we are working in the region Peelland (province of North-Brabant) in Southern Nether- on a sustainable future, to make sure our Themes lands. In 1997, Laarbeek was established by merging the former muni- next generation still can enjoy our natural cipalities Beek en Donk, Aarle-Rixtel, Lieshout and Mariahout. Its name Planning and development 3-4 treasures. By participating in the European regenerated from the downtown area ‘Het Laar’ and ‘Beek’ accentuates Natural environment 5-6 Entente Florale and by showing our green vision, we hope to increase awareness of the stream valley. The valleys of the streams Goorloop and Aa contribute Built environment 7-10 the importance of our green environment. to the unique green area of Beek en Donk. Landscape 11-12 Open green spaces 13-14 Thematic prize: Biodiversity 15-16 Planting - Permanent and/or seasonal 17-18 Environmental education 19-20 Effort and involvement 21-22 We are happy to share our green Tourism and/or leisure 23-24 vision. The rich monumental References 25-26 heritage combined with the open green spaces is characteristic for Beek en Donk. We will show examples of projects where we have integrated development with conservation of our valuable natural environment and existing landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • DEN BOSCH Participatory Governance of Cultural Heritage Quality of Interventions on Cultural Heritage
    Bulwark Heritage Centre From former city gate into a new public space (c) Henk van Zeeland (NL) DEN BOSCH Participatory governance of cultural heritage Quality of interventions on cultural heritage 154,220 How ? The municipality set up a Fortifications Challenge Development Team in charge of the 1 supervision of the restoration works (started 's-Hertogenbosch is a riverside municipality in 2013), in close cooperation with local characterised by impressive fortification walls landscape architects. The municipality and historic water defence features (bulwarks) that carefully selected the team’s composition to date back to the 16th century. Due to the disrepair of combine historical, archaeological, technical the bulwarks and the effects of climate change, at the and ecological expertise necessary to carry out end of the 20th century the inner part of the city was the complex restoration work. threatened by rising waters. The lack of public funding to sustain the urgent restoration work put pressure on the municipality to find a sustainable solution. The team supervised the design and execution of the restoration works, combining traditional Solution 2 techniques with modern design and materials, inspired by traditional Dutch fortress design. Innovative engineering methods keeping The municipality turned to an overall redevelopment the rising water (to 2.5 meters high) out of the plan for the former St. John’s bulwark, deciding to bulwark, while maintaining public space. In restore the former water defence feature instead of parallel, the municipality developed the Bulwark building a new system. The plan includes the creation Heritage Centre’s exploitation strategy of a new heritage and visitors centre with amenities to ensure the financial sustainability of the and cultural activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Overzicht 2020
    Route Overzicht 2020 Route 1 - Grave Route 2 - Oostrum Route 3 - Heumen Route 4 - Nuland Route 5 - Laarbruch Route 6 - Ooijpolder Route 7 - Son en Breugel Route 8 - Ewijk Route 9 - Uedem Route 10 - Groesbeek Route 11 - Ravenstein Route 12 - Stekkenberg-Groesbeek Route 13 - Milheeze Route 14 - Moyland Route 15 - Aarle-Rixtel Route 16 - Maas en Heuvelentocht Route 17 - Maarheeze Route 18 - Kleef-Berg en Dal Route 19 - Griendtsveen Route 20 - Kalkar Route 21 - Helden Route 22 - Kleef Route 23 - Peel en Maasroute Route 24 - Nuenen Route 25 - Sevenum Route 26 - Zeddam Route 27 - Heumen-Grave Route 28 - Louisendorf Route 29 - Goch Route 30 - Castenray Route 31 - Beek en Donk Route 32 - Helenaveen Route 33 - Huisseling Route 34 - Venlo Route 35 - Grubbenvorst Route 36 - Wijchen Route 37 - Schijndel Route 38 - Maasbree Route 39 - Broekhuizen Route 40 - Duffelward Route 41 - Sonsbeck Route 42 - Kalbeck Route 43 - Frasselt Route 44 - Nijnsel Route 45 Grashoek TOS Route Overzicht 2020 Route 1 - Grave [A]+[B] 49 km Sint Anthonis-Ledeacker-Rijkevoort-Haps-Beers-Gassel-Escharen-Grave- Langenboom- Mill-Wilbertoord-Landhorst-Ledeacker-Sint Anthonis TOS Route Overzicht 2020 Route 2 - Oostrum [A]+[B] 53 km Sint Anthonis-Oploo-Stevensbeek-Vierlingsbeek-Holthees-SmaktMaashees- Geijsteren-Oostrum-Venray-Merselo-Vredepeel-Westerbeek- Oploo-Sint Anthonis TOS Route Overzicht 2020 Route 3 - Heumen [A]+[B] 69 km Sint Anthonis-Ledeacker-Rijkevoort-Wanroij-St Hubert-Beers-Gassel- Escharen-Grave-Nederasselt-Overasselt-Heumen-Molenhoek- Groesbeek-Bredeweg-Milsbeek-Ottersum-Gennep-Oeffelt-BeugenRijkevoort-
    [Show full text]
  • AMBITIONS of EINDHOVEN Appendix a to D1.1 Report - Specific Ambitions of the R4E Partner Cities
    This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 649397 AMBITIONS OF EINDHOVEN Appendix A to D1.1 Report - Specific ambitions of the R4E partner cities 15 December 2015 Jan-Willem HOMMES & Luuk POSTMES, Gemeente Eindhoven Elke DEN OUDEN & Rianne VALKENBURG, TU/e LightHouse R4E - Roadmaps for Energy - D1.1 Report - Specific ambitions of the partner cities A 2 This appendix is part of the D1.1 Report - Specific ambitions of the R4E partner cities and contains all results of the ambition setting activities held in the city of Eindhoven. The R4E project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 649397. Disclaimer: This report presents the views of the authors, and does not necessarily reflect the official European Commission’s view on the subject. Versions of this report: 23 April 2015 Draft for internal check in the city (limited distribution) 13 May 2015 Concept for sharing with R4E partners (limited distribution) 6 November 2015 Version for final check 15 December 2015 Final version for public distribution A 3 Appendix A - Ambitions of Eindhoven - smart mobility & smart urban spaces Contents Appendix A Introduction to Eindhoven A 5 Today’s reality: Smart mobility A 8 Today’s reality: Smart urban spaces A 10 Results ambition workshop policy A 12 Results ambition workshop stakeholders A 14 Policies regarding Open Data A 22 Contributions A 25 R4E - Roadmaps for Energy - D1.1 Report - Specific ambitions of the partner cities A 4 Appendix A - Ambitions of Eindhoven - smart mobility & smart urban spaces A 5 Introduction to Eindhoven Introduction to the city • MRE (Metropolitan Region Eindhoven): a cooperative agreement among the municipalities in the Eindhoven metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • Indeling Van Nederland in 40 COROP-Gebieden Gemeentelijke Indeling Van Nederland Op 1 Januari 2019
    Indeling van Nederland in 40 COROP-gebieden Gemeentelijke indeling van Nederland op 1 januari 2019 Legenda COROP-grens Het Hogeland Schiermonnikoog Gemeentegrens Ameland Woonkern Terschelling Het Hogeland 02 Noardeast-Fryslân Loppersum Appingedam Delfzijl Dantumadiel 03 Achtkarspelen Vlieland Waadhoeke 04 Westerkwartier GRONINGEN Midden-Groningen Oldambt Tytsjerksteradiel Harlingen LEEUWARDEN Smallingerland Veendam Westerwolde Noordenveld Tynaarlo Pekela Texel Opsterland Súdwest-Fryslân 01 06 Assen Aa en Hunze Stadskanaal Ooststellingwerf 05 07 Heerenveen Den Helder Borger-Odoorn De Fryske Marren Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Hollands Westerveld Kroon Schagen 08 18 Steenwijkerland EMMEN 09 Coevorden Hoogeveen Medemblik Enkhuizen Opmeer Noordoostpolder Langedijk Stede Broec Meppel Heerhugowaard Bergen Drechterland Urk De Wolden Hoorn Koggenland 19 Staphorst Heiloo ALKMAAR Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Castricum Beemster Kampen 10 Edam- Volendam Uitgeest 40 ZWOLLE Ommen Heemskerk Dalfsen Wormerland Purmerend Dronten Beverwijk Lelystad 22 Hattem ZAANSTAD Twenterand 20 Oostzaan Waterland Oldebroek Velsen Landsmeer Tubbergen Bloemendaal Elburg Heerde Dinkelland Raalte 21 HAARLEM AMSTERDAM Zandvoort ALMERE Hellendoorn Almelo Heemstede Zeewolde Wierden 23 Diemen Harderwijk Nunspeet Olst- Wijhe 11 Losser Epe Borne HAARLEMMERMEER Gooise Oldenzaal Weesp Hillegom Meren Rijssen-Holten Ouder- Amstel Huizen Ermelo Amstelveen Blaricum Noordwijk Deventer 12 Hengelo Lisse Aalsmeer 24 Eemnes Laren Putten 25 Uithoorn Wijdemeren Bunschoten Hof van Voorst Teylingen
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet Zon-PV Noordoost-Brabant PDF Document
    Factsheet zon-PV per RES-regio Regio Noordoost-Brabant Totaaloverzicht Opgesteld vermogen in de regio (in MWp) Per gemeente eind 2019* (in MWp) (In MWp per 1000 huishoudens) 8 Bernheze 17 Bernheze 1,4 3 315 Boekel 10 Boekel 2,4 9 Boxmeer Boxmeer 1,7 21 9 Boxtel 13 Boxtel 1,0 6 Cuijk Cuijk 1,1 12 3 Grave 5 Grave 0,8 204 4 Haaren 8 Haaren 1,4 5 Landerd 9 Landerd 1,4 23 145 Meierijstad 63 Meierijstad 1,9 3 121 Mill en Sint Hubert 6 Mill en Sint Hubert 1,4 20 96 Oss 40 Oss 1,0 86 22 's-Hertogenbosch 45 's-Hertogenbosch 0,6 66 62 4 Sint Anthonis 11 Sint Anthonis 2,3 44 49 38 9 30 27 Sint-Michielsgestel 13 Sint-Michielsgestel 1,1 18 8 13 13 Uden 36 Uden 1,9 4 Vught 5 Vught 0,5 * *(per einde van het kalenderjaar) , , , , , , Woningen Totaal Woningen Totaal Gemiddeld in Nederland: 0,9 Bron: CBS – Zonnestroom: opgesteld vermogen *voorlopige cijfers SDE+ projecten Verdeling naar opstelling van gerealiseerde sde+ projecten (in MWp) Vermogen van SDE+ projecten die nog in de Gemiddeld in Nederland: 63% SDE+ gerealiseerd op daken pijplijn zitten (in MWp) 26 Bernheze 100% Bernheze 39 12 Boekel 57% Boekel 13 24 Boxmeer 95% Boxmeer 24 14 Boxtel 100% Boxtel 14 27 Cuijk 100% Cuijk 40 3 Grave 100% Grave 3 8 Haaren 35% Haaren 8 16 Landerd 100% Landerd 16 117 Meierijstad 95% Meierijstad 129 6 Mill en Sint Hubert 100% Mill en Sint Hubert 6 68 Oss 100% Oss 68 48 's-Hertogenbosch 100% 's-Hertogenbosch 52 27 Sint Anthonis 100% Sint Anthonis 70 9 Sint-Michielsgestel 96% Sint-Michielsgestel 9 33 Uden 50% Uden 40 3 Vught 100% Vught 3 % % % % % % Op daken Op de grond Op daken Totaal Bron: RVO.nl – SDE+ projecten in beheer (peildatum: 22 september 2020) blad 1/2 Factsheet zon-PV per RES-regio Regio Noordoost-Brabant Potentieel Congestiegebieden teruglevering in de regio Zie kaart Enexis hieronder (28 oktober 2020)1 transportcapaciteit beschikbaar beperkt transportcapaciteit beschikbaar geen transportcapaciteit beschikbaar congestieonderzoek Let op: controleer de website van Enexis voor eventuele nieuwe versies van de kaart.
    [Show full text]
  • Samenvoeging Van De Gemeenten Boxmeer, Cuijk, Mill En Sint Hubert En Sint Anthonis (MR-Versie T.B.V
    Samenvoeging van de gemeenten Boxmeer, Cuijk, Mill en Sint Hubert en Sint Anthonis (MR-versie t.b.v. advisering Raad van State) VOORSTEL VAN WET Wij Willem-Alexander, bij de gratie Gods, Koning der Nederlanden, Prins van Oranje-Nassau, enz. enz. enz. Allen, die deze zullen zien of horen lezen, saluut! doen te weten: Alzo Wij in overweging genomen hebben, dat het wenselijk is de gemeenten Boxmeer, Cuijk, Mill en Sint Hubert en Sint Anthonis samen te voegen tot de nieuwe gemeente Land van Cuijk; Zo is het, dat Wij, de Afdeling advisering van de Raad van State gehoord, en met gemeen overleg der Staten-Generaal, hebben goedgevonden en verstaan, gelijk Wij goedvinden en verstaan bij deze: § 1. Opheffing, instelling en rechtsopvolging Artikel 1 Met ingang van de datum van herindeling worden de gemeenten Boxmeer, Cuijk, Mill en Sint Hubert en Sint Anthonis opgeheven. Artikel 2 Met ingang van de datum van herindeling wordt de nieuwe gemeente Land van Cuijk ingesteld, bestaande uit het grondgebied van de op te heffen gemeenten Boxmeer, Cuijk, Mill en Sint Hubert en Sint Anthonis, zoals aangegeven op de bij deze wet behorende kaart. Artikel 3 Voor de nieuwe gemeente Land van Cuijk wordt de op te heffen gemeente Boxmeer aangewezen voor de toepassing van artikel 36 van de Wet algemene regels herindeling, in verband met de toepassing van de instructies en reglementen, bedoeld in dat artikel. Artikel 4 Voor de op te heffen gemeenten Boxmeer, Cuijk, Mill en Sint Hubert en Sint Anthonis wordt de nieuwe gemeente Land van Cuijk aangewezen voor de toepassing van de volgende bepalingen van de Wet algemene regels herindeling: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Afsprakenkader Detailhandel in De Peel
    Afsprakenkader Detailhandel in de Peel Juni 2015 Gemeente Asten Gemeente Deurne Gemeente Gemert-Bakel Gemeente Helmond Gemeente Laarbeek Gemeente Someren Inhoudsopgave Inleiding ............................................................................................................... 3 1. Karakteristieken Subregio de Peel ........................................................................ 5 2. Trends en ontwikkelingen ..................................................................................11 3. Typering winkelgebied/PDV locatie ......................................................................15 4. Perspectief per winkelgebied ..............................................................................16 5. Perspectief PDV locatie (Engelseweg) ..................................................................20 6. Visie op de toekomstige detailhandelsstructuur.....................................................21 7. Afsprakenkader ................................................................................................27 Bronnenlijst .........................................................................................................30 Bijlage 1: Plannen in de subregio ............................................................................31 Bijlage 2: Beleid per gemeente...............................................................................33 Bijlage 3: Definities typering winkelgebieden Locatus ................................................38 Bijlage 4: Verslag bustour .....................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • Add Photo(S) from the Visit
    Feedback report Peer advice Breda, the Netherlands CASCADE and peer- to- peer learning 2 Report produced by CASCADE project Author: Eindhoven Version: 1.0 CASCADE is an EU-funded project led by EUROCITIES which aims to design and deliver large-scale networking and mutual learning actions on local energy leadership among EUROCITIES members. The CASCADE consortium is composed of: EUROCITIES, Wuppertal Institut, Koucky & Partners and the following cities: Amaroussion, Amsterdam, Birmingham, Burgas, Edinburgh, Eindhoven, Gateshead, Genoa, Gijon, Malmo, Mannheim, Milan, Nantes, Stockholm, Sunderland, Tampere, Terrassa, Venice and Warsaw. The CASCADE project is co-financed by the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme. The sole responsibility for the content of this report lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EACI nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. www.cascadecities.eu May 2014 CASCADE Feedback report – Peer advice in Breda, Netherlands 3 CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 4 2. Participants ................................................................................................. 4 3. The advice-giving ........................................................................................... 4 4. Evaluation of the visit ..................................................................................... 5 5. Conclusions
    [Show full text]
  • Programmarekening 2018 Primitieve Actuele Rekening 2018 Begroting 2018 Begroting 2018 Prooramma Omschriivinq
    Raadsvergadering 27 juni 2019 ~ Laarbeek l= Waterpoort van de Peel Inhoudsopgave Lijst met afkortingen 4 KERNGEGEVENS 8 BESTUURLIJKE INFORMATIE 10 .Jaarverslag 2018 12 1. Inleiding 13 1.1 De jaarstukken 14 1.2 Opzet jaarstukken 2018 14 1.3 De programmaverantwoording 14 1.4 De paragrafen 15 1.5 De jaarrekening 15 1.6 De balans 15 2. Financiële beschouwingen 16 2.1 Begroting 2018 17 2.2 Realisatie 2018 17 3. Programma's 18 3.1 Programma Veiligheid 19 3.2 Programma Woon- en leefklimaat 25 3.3 Programma Gezondheid en zorg 39 3.4 Programma Welzijn en onderwijs 49 3.5 Programma Economie en werkgelegenheid 57 3.6 Programma Directe dienstverlening 67 3. 7 Programma Relatie tussen burgers en bestuur 77 3.8 Programma Financiën en bedrijfsvoering 83 4. De paragrafen 92 4.1 Lokale heffingen 94 4.2 Weerstandsvermogen en risicobeheersing 103 4.3 Onderhoud kapitaalgoederen 111 4.4 Financiering 116 4.5 Bedrijfsvoering 119 4.6 Verbonden Partijen 125 4. 7 Grondbeleid 142 4.8 Bezuinigingen 145 4.9 Uitkering uit het gemeentefonds 147 5. Financiële recapitulatie 150 5.1 Samenvatting programma's 151 5.2 Programmaplan 2018 152 Jaarrekening over het begrotingsjaar 2018 154 Balans 156 Grondslagen voor waardering 2018 158 Balans per 31 december 2018 163 Toelichting op de balans per 31 december 2018 166 <I bakertilly Gewaarmerkt vcor identificat~\._ doeleinden d.d: 27-06-2019 \.J1 Niet uit de balans blijkende verplichtingen 174 Baten en lasten 176 Grondslagen voor resultaatbepaling 2018 178 Overzicht van baten en lasten in de jaarrekening 2018 180 Overzicht van
    [Show full text]