Some Archimedean Incircles in an Arbelos

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Some Archimedean Incircles in an Arbelos INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMETRY Vol. 8 (2019), No. 2, 84 - 98 SOME ARCHIMEDEAN INCIRCLES IN AN ARBELOS NGUYEN NGOC GIANG and LE VIET AN Abstract. In this paper, we show that some Archimedean incircles con- structed from the arbelos. As we known, \An arbelos is a plane region bounded by three semicircles with three apexes such that each corner of the semicircles is shared with one of the others (connected), all on the same side of a straight line (the baseline) that contains their diameters. One of the properties of the arbe- los noticed and proved by Archimedes in his Book of Lemmas is that the two small circles inscribed into two pieces of the arbelos cut off by the line perpendicular to the baseline through the common point of the two small semicircles are congruent. The circles have been known as Archimedes' twin circles. Consider an arbelos formed by semi-circles (O1), (O2), and (O) of radii a; b; and a + b. The semi-circles (O1) and (O) meet at A,(O2) and (O) at B,(O1) and (O2) at C. Let CD be the divided line of the smaller ab semi-circles. The radius of Archimedes' twin circles equals t := a+b . Circles of the same radius are said to be Archimedean.", [1]. In this article, we go to some new Archimedean incircles constructed from the arbelos. 0 0 Theorem 1. Let O1;O2 be points symmetric to the points O1;O2 with re- 0 spect to the points A; B, respectively. Tangent line to (O) at D meets (BO1) 0 at A1 and B1, and meets (AO2) at A2 and B2. Let C1 be the point of inter- 0 section of the tangent lines to (BO1) at A1 and B1, and C1 be the point of 0 intersection of tangent lines to (AO2) at A2 and B2. Then the incircles of triangles A1B1C1 and A2B2C2 are Archimedean. ||||||||||||{ Keywords and phrases: arbelos, Archimedean incircles, Inversion. (2010)Mathematics Subject Classification: Received: 22.04.2019. In revised form: 26.09.2019. Accepted: 11.09.2019 Some Archimedean incircles in an arbelos 85 Figure 1. 0 0 Proof. Let M1 be the center of (BO 1) then M1 is the midpoint of BO 1 ; 0 BD meets (BO 1) at I1 (I1 6= B), M1C1 meets A1B1 at H1 (see figure 1). We have M1C1?A1B1 at the midpoint H1 of A1B1 and the homothety BA 0 BO 1 0 HB transforms (BA) into (BO 1). Hence M1I1 k DO?A1B1 . It follows M1I1 ≡ M1C1 or I1 2 M1C1. Since M1C1 is the perpendicular bisector of A1B1 and I1 2 M1C1, triangle I1A1B1 is isosceless at I1 . It follows I1\A1B1 = I1\B1A1. Note that C1A1 is 0 tangent to (BO 1) so IA\1C = I1\B1A1 = I1\A1B1. Similarly, I1\B1C1 = I1\B1A1. It follows that I1 is the incenter of triangle A1B1C1. Since I1H1?A1B1, I1H1 is the inradius of triangle A1B1C1. We easily see that two triangles I1H1D and BCD are similar (a-a). It follows I1H1 = BC . Hence I1D BD BC I D M O BM − BO I H = · I D = BC · 1 = BC · 1 = BC · 1 1 1 BD 1 BD BO BO 2a+2b+a − (a + b) ab = 2b · 2 = = t (a + b) a + b It follows that the incircle I1(H1) of triangle A1B1C1 is Archimedean. Similarly, the incircle of triangle A2B2C2 is also Archimedean. 0 0 Theorem 2. Let O 1;O 2 be points symmetric to the points O1;O2 with respect to A; B, respectively. Let C1;C2 be points symmetric to the point C with respect to A; B, respectively. The common tangent lines to two semi- 0 0 circles (AO 2) and (BO 1) meet the circle (BC1) at A1 and B1 , and meet the circle (AC2) at A2 and B2. Let T1 be the point of intersection of tangent 86 Nguyen Ngoc Giang and Le Viet An lines to (BC1) at A1 and B1, and T2 be the point of intersection of tangent lines to (AC2) at A2 and B2. Then the incircle of triangles A1B1T1 and A2B2T2 are Archimedean. Figure 2. 0 0 Proof. Let (M1); (N1) be the circles (BO 1); (BC1); BD; AD meet (BO 1), 0 (AO 2) at E; F , respectively (see figure 2). We easily see that the homothety BO H BM1 transforms (O) into (BO0 ) . It follows BD = BO = a+b = 2(a+b) B 1 BE BM1 3a+2b 3a+2b 2 so DE = BE−BD = a , we have BD = 2pb(a + b). Hence DE = p BD BD 2(a+bp) b(a+b)a a(a+b)b . Similarly DF = . Hence DE = p a . On the other hand, a+b p a+b DF b 2 a(a+b) AD = p = p a . It follows DE = DA or DA:DF = DB:DE . This BD 2 b(a+b) b DF DB thing proves that the inscribed quadrilateral ABF E has two perpendicular diagonals. Note that O is the midpoint of AB, applying the Brahmagupta BO BM1 theorem, we have OD?EF . Under the homthety HB , we have OD k 0 M1E . It follows M1E?EF so EF is the tangent line to (BO 1). Similarly, 0 EF is the tangent line to (AO 2). Hence EF is the common tangent of 0 0 (BO 1) and (AO 2). From that A1B1 ≡ EF . Let I1 be the point of intersection of BD and (BC1)(I1 6= B); H1 = N1T1 \A1B1. We easily prove that I1(H1) is the incircle of triangle A1B1T1. 3a+2b a Furthermore, I1 2 N1T1 and M1N1 = (2a + b) − 2 = 2 . From that, we easily see that two right triangles I1EH1 and BDC are similar so a I1H1 BC I1E M1N1 2 ab = ) I1H1 = · BC = · BC = · 2b = = t: I1E BD BD BO a + b a + b It follows that I1(H1) is Archimedean. Similarly, the incircle of triangle A2B2T2 is also Archimedean. Theorem 3. Let D0 be a point symmetric to the point D with respect to 0 AB. The tangent line to (O) at D meets the circles (OiDD ) with i = 1; 2 Some Archimedean incircles in an arbelos 87 0 at Ci (Ci 6= D): The tangent lines to (OiDD ) at D and Ci meet at Ti. Then the incircles of triangles T1C1D and T2C2D are Archimedean. Figure 3. 0 Proof. Let P1 be the incenter of circle (O1DD ); H1 = P1T1 \ DC1 and let I1 be the incenter of triangle T1C1D. Similarly to the above theorem, we obtain that I1(H1) is the incircle of triangle T1C1D and I1 is the point of 0 intersection of P1T1 and the small arc DC of (pODD ) (see figure 3). We easily see that O1C = a; O1O = b; CD = 2 ab and OD = a + b. Applying the Pythagorean theorem, we have p 2 2 p 2 O1D = O1C + CD = a + 4ab: Let K1 be the midpoint of DO1 then we easily see that two triangles O1CD and O1K1P1 are similar. It follows O C O K 1 = 1 1 : O1D O1P1 p p 2 2 Hence O P = O K · O1D = a +4ab · a +4ab = a+4b . 1 1 1 1 O1C 2 a 2 a+4b a+2b Hence OP1 = O1P1 − OO1 = 2 − b = 2 . Let L1 be the projection from P1 onto OD then two triangles OCD and OL1P1 are similar. It follows OC OL1 OC a − b a + 2b = ) OL1 = · OP1 = · : OD OP1 OD a + b 2 88 Nguyen Ngoc Giang and Le Viet An Hence a − b a + 2b DL = OD − OL = a + b − · 1 1 a + b 2 2(a + b)2 − (a2 − 2b2 + ab) a2 + 3ab + 4b2 = = : 2(a + b) 2(a + b) Since P1H1DL1 is rectangular, a2 + 3ab + 4b2 P H = DL = : 1 1 1 2(a + b) It follows I1H1 = P1I1 − P1H1 = P1O1 − P1H1 a + 4b a2 + 3ab + 4b2 ab = − = = t; 2 2(a + b) a + b this thing means that I1(H1) is Archimedean. Similarly, the incircle of triangle T2C2D is also Archimedean. Theorem 4. The common tangents of two semi-circles (AO2) and (BO1) meets the circle A(C) at A1 and B1, and meets the circle B(C) at A2 and B2. The tangent lines at A1 and B1 of circle A(C) meet at C1, and the tangents at A2 and B2 of B(C) meets at T2. Then the incircles of triangles T1A1B1 and T2A2B2 are Archimedean. Figure 4. Proof. Let I1 be the incircle of triangle T1A1B1; O3;O4 be the centers of circles (AO2); (BO1), respectively; and suppose that the line A1B1 is tangent to (AO2); (BO1) at T3;T4, respectively; and AT1 \ A1B1 = H1 (see figure 4). We easily have that AT1?A1B1 and I1(H1) is the incircle of triangle T1A1B1; I1 belongs to A(C) and two lines O3T3 and O4T4 are parallel. Some Archimedean incircles in an arbelos 89 a+b 2a+b Using the simple calculations, we have O3O4 = 2 , O3T3 = AO3 = 2 , 2b+a 3a+2b O4T4 = 2 and AO2 = AO3 + O3O2 = 2 . We have O3T3:AO4 = AH1:O3O4 + O4T4:AO3; 2a + b 3a + 2b a + b 2b + a 2a + b · = AN · + · ; 2 2 3 2 2 2 2a2 + ab AN = : 3 a + b 2a2+ab ab From that I1H1 = AI1 − AH1 = 2a − a+b = a+b = t. This thing means that the circle I1(H1) is Archimedean. Similarly, the incircle of triangle T2A2B2 is also Archimedean. _ Theorem 5. Let M be the midpoint of the arc AB of a semi-circle (O). 0 The circle (MO ) meets (MO1O2) at M and T .
Recommended publications
  • The Arbelos in Wasan Geometry: Chiba's Problem
    Global Journal of Advanced Research on Classical and Modern Geometries ISSN: 2284-5569, Vol.8, (2019), Issue 2, pp.98-104 THE ARBELOS IN WASAN GEOMETRY: CHIBA’S PROBLEM HIROSHI OKUMURA Abstract. We consider a sangaku problem involving an arbelos with two congruent circles, and give several conditions where the two congruent circles appear. Also we show several pairs of congruent circles and Archimedean circles. 2010 Mathematical Subject Classification: 01A27, 51M04, 51N20. Keywords and phrases: arbelos, Archimedean circle, non-Archimedean congruent circles. 1. INTRODUCTION We consider the arbelos appeared in Wasan geometry, and consider an arbelos formed by three semicircles α, β and γ with diameters AO , BO and AB , respectively for a point O on the segment AB . The radii of α and β are denoted by a and b, respectively. We consider the following sangaku .(in 1880 [5] (see Figure 1 (نproblem proposed by Chiba ( ઍ༿ӫ࣏҆ δ ε γ α h β B O H A Figure 1. Problem 1. For a point H on the segment AO, let h be the perpendicular to AB at H. Let δ be the circle touching α and β externally and h, and let ε be the incircle of the curvilinear triangle made by α, γ and h. If δ and ε touch and δ is congruent to the circle of diameter AH, find the radius of ε in terms of a and b. Circles of radius rA = ab /(a + b) are said to be Archimedean. In this paper we generalize the problem and consider two circles touching at a point on a perpendicular to the line AB .
    [Show full text]
  • Archimedes and the Arbelos1 Bobby Hanson October 17, 2007
    Archimedes and the Arbelos1 Bobby Hanson October 17, 2007 The mathematician’s patterns, like the painter’s or the poet’s must be beautiful; the ideas like the colours or the words, must fit together in a harmonious way. Beauty is the first test: there is no permanent place in the world for ugly mathematics. — G.H. Hardy, A Mathematician’s Apology ACBr 1 − r Figure 1. The Arbelos Problem 1. We will warm up on an easy problem: Show that traveling from A to B along the big semicircle is the same distance as traveling from A to B by way of C along the two smaller semicircles. Proof. The arc from A to C has length πr/2. The arc from C to B has length π(1 − r)/2. The arc from A to B has length π/2. ˜ 1My notes are shamelessly stolen from notes by Tom Rike, of the Berkeley Math Circle available at http://mathcircle.berkeley.edu/BMC6/ps0506/ArbelosBMC.pdf . 1 2 If we draw the line tangent to the two smaller semicircles, it must be perpendicular to AB. (Why?) We will let D be the point where this line intersects the largest of the semicircles; X and Y will indicate the points of intersection with the line segments AD and BD with the two smaller semicircles respectively (see Figure 2). Finally, let P be the point where XY and CD intersect. D X P Y ACBr 1 − r Figure 2 Problem 2. Now show that XY and CD are the same length, and that they bisect each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions Manual to Accompany Classical Geometry
    Solutions Manual to Accompany Classical Geometry Solutions Manual to Accompany CLASSICAL GEOMETRY Euclidean, Transformational, Inversive, and Projective I. E. Leonard J. E. Lewis A. C. F. Liu G. W. Tokarsky Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton, Canada WILEY Copyright © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permission. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 the Arbelos
    Chapter 6 The arbelos 6.1 Archimedes’ theorems on the arbelos Theorem 6.1 (Archimedes 1). The two circles touching CP on different sides and AC CB each touching two of the semicircles have equal diameters AB· . P W1 W2 A O1 O C O2 B A O1 O C O2 B Theorem 6.2 (Archimedes 2). The diameter of the circle tangent to all three semi- circles is AC CB AB · · . AC2 + AC CB + CB2 · We shall consider Theorem ?? in ?? later, and for now examine Archimedes’ wonderful proofs of the more remarkable§ Theorems 6.1 and 6.2. By synthetic reasoning, he computed the radii of these circles. 1Book of Lemmas, Proposition 5. 2Book of Lemmas, Proposition 6. 602 The arbelos 6.1.1 Archimedes’ proof of the twin circles theorem In the beginning of the Book of Lemmas, Archimedes has established a basic proposition 3 on parallel diameters of two tangent circles. If two circles are tangent to each other (internally or externally) at a point P , and if AB, XY are two parallel diameters of the circles, then the lines AX and BY intersect at P . D F I W1 E H W2 G A O C B Figure 6.1: Consider the circle tangent to CP at E, and to the semicircle on AC at G, to that on AB at F . If EH is the diameter through E, then AH and BE intersect at F . Also, AE and CH intersect at G. Let I be the intersection of AE with the outer semicircle. Extend AF and BI to intersect at D.
    [Show full text]
  • Pappus of Alexandria: Book 4 of the Collection
    Pappus of Alexandria: Book 4 of the Collection For other titles published in this series, go to http://www.springer.com/series/4142 Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences Managing Editor J.Z. Buchwald Associate Editors J.L. Berggren and J. Lützen Advisory Board C. Fraser, T. Sauer, A. Shapiro Pappus of Alexandria: Book 4 of the Collection Edited With Translation and Commentary by Heike Sefrin-Weis Heike Sefrin-Weis Department of Philosophy University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA [email protected] Sources Managing Editor: Jed Z. Buchwald California Institute of Technology Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences MC 101–40 Pasadena, CA 91125 USA Associate Editors: J.L. Berggren Jesper Lützen Simon Fraser University University of Copenhagen Department of Mathematics Institute of Mathematics University Drive 8888 Universitetsparken 5 V5A 1S6 Burnaby, BC 2100 Koebenhaven Canada Denmark ISBN 978-1-84996-004-5 e-ISBN 978-1-84996-005-2 DOI 10.1007/978-1-84996-005-2 Springer London Dordrecht Heidelberg New York British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Control Number: 2009942260 Mathematics Classification Number (2010) 00A05, 00A30, 03A05, 01A05, 01A20, 01A85, 03-03, 51-03 and 97-03 © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Division by Zero Calculus Vol. 1 (January-December, 2021)
    International Journal of Division by Zero Calculus Vol. 1 (January-December, 2021) GEOMETRY AND DIVISION BY ZERO CALCULUS HIROSHI OKUMURA Abstract. We demonstrate several results in plane geometry derived from division by zero and division by zero calculus. The results show that the two new concepts open an entirely new world of mathematics. 1. Introduction The lack of division by zero has been a serious glaring omission in our mathe- matics. While recent publications [3], [7], [8], [22], [29] have offered a final solution to this [3]: z = 0 for any element z in a field: (1.1) 0 In this article we show several results in plane geometry obtained from division by zero given by (1.1) and division by zero calculus, which is a generalization of division by zero. For a meromorphic function W = f(z), we consider the Laurent expansion of f around z = a: nX=−1 X1 n n W = f(z) = Cn(z − a) + C0 + Cn(z − a) : n=−∞ n=1 Then we define f(a) = C0. This is a generalization of (1.1) called division by zero calculus [29]. Now we can consider the value f(a) = C0 at an isolated singular point a. We consider some families of circles in the plane, each of the members is rep- resented by a Cartesian equation fz(x; y) = 0 with parameter z 2 R. Here, we assume that if x and y are fixed, fz(x; y) is a meromorphic function in z. Then, for the Laurent expansion of the function fz(x; y) at z = a for fixed x; y, the corresponding coefficient Cn(a; x; y) is depending on also x and y.
    [Show full text]
  • REFLECTIONS on the ARBELOS Written in Block Capitals
    REFLECTIONS ON THE ARBELOS HAROLD P. BOAS Written in block capitals on lined paper, the letter bore a postmark from a Northeastern seaport. \I have a problem that I would like to solve," the letter began, \but unfortunately I cannot. I dropped out from 2nd year high school, and this problem is too tough for me." There followed the diagram shown in Figure 1 along with the statement of the problem: to prove that the line segment DE has the same length as the line segment AB. Figure 1. A correspondent's hand-drawn puzzle \I tried this and went even to the library for information about mathematics," the letter continued, \but I have not succeeded. Would you be so kind to give me a full explanation?" Mindful of the romantic story [18] of G. H. Hardy's discovery of the Indian genius Ramanujan, a mathematician who receives such a letter wants ¯rst to rule out the remote possibility that the writer is some great unknown talent. Next, the question arises of whether the correspondent falls into the category of eccentrics whom Underwood Dudley terms mathematical cranks [14], for one ought not to encourage cranks. Date: October 26, 2004. This article is based on a lecture delivered at the nineteenth annual Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Conference, March 15, 2002. 1 2 HAROLD P. BOAS Since this letter claimed no great discovery, but rather asked politely for help, I judged it to come from an enthusiastic mathematical am- ateur. Rather than ¯le such letters in the oubliette, or fob them o® on junior colleagues, I try to reply in a friendly way to communica- tions from coherent amateurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Icons of Mathematics an EXPLORATION of TWENTY KEY IMAGES Claudi Alsina and Roger B
    AMS / MAA DOLCIANI MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITIONS VOL 45 Icons of Mathematics AN EXPLORATION OF TWENTY KEY IMAGES Claudi Alsina and Roger B. Nelsen i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page i — #1 i i 10.1090/dol/045 Icons of Mathematics An Exploration of Twenty Key Images i i i i i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page ii — #2 i i c 2011 by The Mathematical Association of America (Incorporated) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 2011923441 Print ISBN 978-0-88385-352-8 Electronic ISBN 978-0-88385-986-5 Printed in the United States of America Current Printing (last digit): 10987654321 i i i i i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page iii — #3 i i The Dolciani Mathematical Expositions NUMBER FORTY-FIVE Icons of Mathematics An Exploration of Twenty Key Images Claudi Alsina Universitat Politecnica` de Catalunya Roger B. Nelsen Lewis & Clark College Published and Distributed by The Mathematical Association of America i i i i i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page iv — #4 i i DOLCIANI MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITIONS Committee on Books Frank Farris, Chair Dolciani Mathematical Expositions Editorial Board Underwood Dudley, Editor Jeremy S. Case Rosalie A. Dance Tevian Dray Thomas M. Halverson Patricia B. Humphrey Michael J. McAsey Michael J. Mossinghoff Jonathan Rogness Thomas Q. Sibley i i i i i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page v — #5 i i The DOLCIANI MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITIONS series of the Mathematical As- sociation of America was established through a generous gift to the Association from Mary P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geometry of the Arbelos Brian Mortimer, Carleton University April, 1998
    The Geometry of The Arbelos Brian Mortimer, Carleton University April, 1998 The basic figure of the arbelos (meaning “shoemaker’s knife”) is formed by three semicircles with diameters on the same line. Figure 1. The Shoemaker’s Knife Figure 2. Archimedes (died 212 BC) included several theorems about the arbelos in his “Book of Lemmas”. For example, in Figure 2, the area of the arbelos is equal to the area of the circle with diameter AD. The key is that AD2 = BD DC then expand BC2 = (BD + DC)2. · Another result is that, in Figure 3, the circles centred at E and F have the same radius. The two drawings of the figure illustrate how the theorem does not depend on the position of D on the base line. Figure 3. Another interesting elementary problem about the arbelos is to show (Figure 4) that, if A and C are the points of contact of the common tangent of the two inner circles then ABCD is a rectangle. See Stueve [12], for example. Figure 4. 1 Five centuries later, Pappus of Alexandria (circa 320 AD) gave a proof of the following remakable theorem about the arbelos. He claimed that it was known to the ancients but we now ascribe to Pappus himself. The rest of this paper is devoted to a proof of this result; the argument is developed from the proof presented by Heath [5] page 371. Theorem 1 If a chain of circles C1,C2,... is constructed inside an arbelos so that C1 is tangent to the three semicircles and Cn is tangent to two semi-circles and Cn 1 then, for all n, the height of the centre of − Cn above the base of the arbelos BC is n times the diameter of Cn.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Constructions of the Incircle of an Arbelos
    Forum Geometricorum b Volume 1 (2001) 133–136. bbb FORUM GEOM ISSN 1534-1178 Simple Constructions of the Incircle of an Arbelos Peter Y. Woo Abstract. We give several simple constructions of the incircle of an arbelos, also known as a shoemaker’s knife. Archimedes, in his Book of Lemmas, studied the arbelos bounded by three semi- circles with diameters AB, AC, and CB, all on the same side of the diameters. 1 See Figure 1. Among other things, he determined the radius of the incircle of the arbelos. In Figure 2, GH is the diameter of the incircle parallel to the base AB, and G, H are the (orthogonal) projections of G, H on AB. Archimedes showed that GHHG is a square, and that AG, GH, HB are in geometric progression. See [1, pp. 307–308]. Z Z G Y X Y X H ABC ABG C H Figure 1 Figure 2 In this note we give several simple constructions of the incircle of the arbelos. The elegant Construction 1 below was given by Leon Bankoff [2]. The points of tangency are constructed by drawing circles with centers at the midpoints of two of the semicircles of the arbelos. In validating Bankoff’s construction, we obtain Constructions 2 and 3, which are easier in the sense that one is a ruler-only construction, and the other makes use only of the midpoint of one semicircle. Z Z Z Y Q Q ABX C P P Y X S Y X ABC ABC M Construction 1 Construction 2 Construction 3 Publication Date: September 18, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • TME Volume 7, Numbers 2 and 3
    The Mathematics Enthusiast Volume 7 Number 2 Numbers 2 & 3 Article 21 7-2010 TME Volume 7, Numbers 2 and 3 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme Part of the Mathematics Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation (2010) "TME Volume 7, Numbers 2 and 3," The Mathematics Enthusiast: Vol. 7 : No. 2 , Article 21. Available at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol7/iss2/21 This Full Volume is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Mathematics Enthusiast by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast ISSN 1551-3440 VOL. 7, NOS 2&3, JULY 2010, pp.175-462 Editor-in-Chief Bharath Sriraman, The University of Montana Associate Editors: Lyn D. English, Queensland University of Technology, Australia Simon Goodchild, University of Agder, Norway Brian Greer, Portland State University, USA Luis Moreno-Armella, Cinvestav-IPN, México International Editorial Advisory Board Mehdi Alaeiyan, Iran University of Science and Technology, Iran Miriam Amit, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel Ziya Argun, Gazi University, Turkey Ahmet Arikan, Gazi University, Turkey. Astrid Beckmann, University of Education, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany Raymond Bjuland, University of Stavanger, Norway Morten Blomhøj, Roskilde University, Denmark Robert Carson, Montana State University- Bozeman, USA Mohan Chinnappan,
    [Show full text]
  • Archimedean Circles Induced by Skewed Arbeloi
    Journal for Geometry and Graphics Volume 16 (2012), No. 1, 13–17. Archimedean Circles Induced by Skewed Arbeloi Ryuichi¯ Nakajima1, Hiroshi Okumura2 1318-1 Goryo¯ Matsuida, Annaka Gunma 379-0302, Japan 2251 Moo 15 Ban Kesorn, Tambol Sila, Amphur Muang Khonkaen 40000, Thailand emails: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Infinite Archimedean circles touching one of the inner circles of the arbelos are induced by skewed arbeloi. Key Words: arbelos, skewed arbelos, infinite Archimedean circles MSC 2010: 51M04 1. Introduction On the problem to find infinite Archimedean circles of the arbelos, the following four have priority to be considered: (P1) to find infinite Archimedean circles touching the outer circle of the arbelos, (P2) to find infinite Archimedean circles passing through the tangent point of the two inner circles, (P3) to find infinite Archimedean circles touching the radical axis of the inner circles, and (P4) to find infinite Archimedean circles touching one of the inner circles. Solutions of (P1), (P2) and (P3) are given in [4], [6] and [2], respectively. But no solutions can be found for (P4). In this note we give a solution of this problem. Let O be a point on a segment AB and α, β and γ be the circles with diameters OA, OB and AB, respectively. We show that infinite Archimedean circles of the arbelos formed by the circles α, β and γ can be obtained by considering arbitrary circles touching α and β at points different from O. Let a and b be the respective radii of the circles α and β.
    [Show full text]