DOCSLIB.ORG

Abeyta Settlement Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abeyta Settlement Agreement ABEYTA WATER RIGHTS ADJUDICATION: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AMONG THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TAOS PUEBLO, THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, THE TAOS VALLEY ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION AND ITS 55 MEMBER ACEQUIAS, THE TOWN OF TAOS, EL PRADO WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT, AND THE 12 TAOS AREA MUTUAL DOMESTIC WATER CONSUMERS’ ASSOCIATIONS Dated December 12, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PARTIES TO THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. .................................................................. 1 1.1. EPWSD ..............................................................................................................................1 1.2. Acequias ............................................................................................................................1 1.3. MDWCAs ...........................................................................................................................1 1.4. State ..................................................................................................................................1 1.5. Pueblo ...............................................................................................................................2 1.6. TVAA .................................................................................................................................2 1.7. Town .................................................................................................................................2 1.8. United States .....................................................................................................................2 2. DEFINITIONS. ................................................................................................................. 2 2.1. AFY ....................................................................................................................................2 2.2. Aboriginal Priority Date ......................................................................................................2 2.3. Acequia .............................................................................................................................2 2.4. Adjudication ......................................................................................................................2 2.5. Arroyo Seco Abajo .............................................................................................................3 2.6. Arroyo Seco Arriba .............................................................................................................3 2.7. Attachment .......................................................................................................................3 2.8. Buffalo Pasture ..................................................................................................................3 2.9. Buffalo Pasture Depletions .................................................................................................3 2.10. Buffalo Pasture Recharge Project .......................................................................................3 2.11. CIR.....................................................................................................................................3 2.12. El Prado .............................................................................................................................4 2.13. Enforcement Date ..............................................................................................................4 2.14. FDR ...................................................................................................................................4 2.15. Forbear, Forbearance .........................................................................................................4 2.16. Future Groundwater Diversions .........................................................................................4 2.17. GPM ..................................................................................................................................4 2.18. HIA Right ...........................................................................................................................4 2.19. Historically Irrigated Acreage .............................................................................................5 2.20. Impair, Impairment ............................................................................................................5 2.21. Lawful Irrigation or Stock Uses ...........................................................................................5 2.22. Market, Marketing, Marketing Agreement .........................................................................5 2.23. Mutual-Benefit Projects .....................................................................................................5 2.24. Mutual-Benefit Projects Parties ..........................................................................................5 2.25. Parciante ...........................................................................................................................5 2.26. Partial Final Decree ............................................................................................................6 2.27. Party, Parties .....................................................................................................................6 i 2.28. Pre-Basin Groundwater Right .............................................................................................6 2.29. PDR ...................................................................................................................................6 2.30. Pueblo Lands .....................................................................................................................6 2.31. San Juan-Chama Project .....................................................................................................6 2.32. Secretary ...........................................................................................................................6 2.33. Settlement Act ...................................................................................................................7 2.34. Settlement Model ..............................................................................................................7 2.35. State Engineer ...................................................................................................................7 2.36. Stream Segment, Stream Segments ....................................................................................7 2.37. Subfile Order .....................................................................................................................9 2.38. Taos Pueblo Water Use Survey ...........................................................................................9 2.39. Taos Valley ........................................................................................................................9 2.40. Taos Valley Stream System .................................................................................................9 2.41. Taos Valley Tributaries .......................................................................................................9 2.42. Temporary Storage for Irrigation Use................................................................................ 10 2.43. Tributary Depletions ........................................................................................................ 10 2.44. Water Rights Owning Parties ............................................................................................ 10 3. MUTUAL BENEFITS AND CONSIDERATION. .................................................................... 10 3.1. IN GENERAL. .................................................................................................................... 10 3.2. BUFFALO PASTURE PROTECTIONS. ................................................................................... 10 3.3. SAN JUAN-CHAMA PROJECT WATER. ................................................................................ 11 3.4. RIO GRANDE SEGMENT DEPLETIONS................................................................................. 11 3.5. MITIGATION WELL SYSTEM. ............................................................................................. 11 3.6. ARROYO SECO ARRIBA PROJECT. ...................................................................................... 12 3.7. WAIVER OF OBJECTIONS TO PARTIAL FINAL DECREE. ........................................................ 12 3.8. WAIVER OF INTER SE CHALLENGES. .................................................................................. 12 3.9. WAIVER OF CHALLENGES TO DOMESTIC WELLS. ................................................................ 12 3.10. WAIVER OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROTESTS. ......................................................................... 12 4. ENFORCEABILITY; PARTIES BOUND. .............................................................................. 13 4.1. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT. ................................................................................................ 13 4.2. PROCEDURE FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL DECREE. ......................................................... 13 4.3. ENFORCEABILITY OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. ............................................................... 13 4.4. EXPIRATION DATE. ........................................................................................................... 14 5. TAOS PUEBLO
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydrogeologic Investigation of the Southern Taos Valley, Taos County, New Mexico
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES Hydrogeologic Investigation of the Southern Taos Valley, Taos County, New Mexico Peggy S. Johnson Paul W. Bauer Brigitte Felix Final Technical Report August 2016 (updated November 2016) Open-File Report 581 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources A division of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM 87801 (575) 835 5490 Fax (575) 835 6333 geoinfo.nmt.edu Hydrogeologic Investigation of the Southern Taos Valley, Taos County, New Mexico Peggy S. Johnson Paul W. Bauer Brigitte Felix Final Technical Report August 2016 (updated November 2016) Open-File Report 581 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources PROJECT FUNDING Taos County New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Aquifer Mapping Program Healy Foundation The views and conclusions are those of the authors, and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the State of New Mexico. Cover photograph: View north down the Picuris piedmont in an area where Quaternary sand and gravel depos- its cover a complex system of buried Embudo faults and Picuris-Pecos faults. Proterozoic rocks of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains are on the right horizon, and isolated volcanoes of the Taos Plateau volcanic field in the Rio Grande rift are on the left horizon. The water well being drilled in the fall of 2015 penetrated 1200 feet of Santa Fe Group and Picuris Formation sedimentary rocks. Photograph by Paul Bauer NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES SOUTH TAOS VALLEY, TAOS COUNTY CONTENTS Proterozoic rocks ....................................................31 Executive Summary ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fire History in the Taos Valley Watersheds, New Mexico, USA
    fire Article Surface Fire to Crown Fire: Fire History in the Taos Valley Watersheds, New Mexico, USA Lane B. Johnson 1 and Ellis Q. Margolis 2,* 1 University of Minnesota, Cloquet Forestry Center, 175 University Drive, Cloquet, MN 55720, USA; [email protected] 2 U. S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, New Mexico Landscapes Field Station, 301 Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, NM 87508, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-505-954-2251 Received: 9 February 2019; Accepted: 8 March 2019; Published: 14 March 2019 Abstract: Tree-ring fire scars, tree ages, historical photographs, and historical surveys indicate that, for centuries, fire played different ecological roles across gradients of elevation, forest, and fire regimes in the Taos Valley Watersheds. Historical fire regimes collapsed across the three watersheds by 1899, leaving all sites without fire for at least 119 years. Historical photographs and quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) ages indicate that a high-severity fire historically burned at multiple high-elevation subalpine plots in today’s Village of Taos Ski Valley, with large high-severity patches (>640 ha). Low-severity, frequent (9–29-year median interval) surface fires burned on the south aspects in nearby lower elevation dry conifer forests in all watersheds. Fires were associated with drought during the fire year. Widespread fires commonly burned synchronously in multiple watersheds during more severe drought years, preceded by wet years, including fire in all three watersheds in 1664, 1715, and 1842. In contrast, recent local “large” wildfires have only burned within single watersheds and may not be considered large in a historical context.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico a Plan for Data Recovery at Two Archaeologmal Sites Taos County, New Mexico Along Nm 522 Near Jan Cristobal
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO A PLAN FOR DATA RECOVERY AT TWO ARCHAEOLOGMAL SITES ALONG NM 522 NEAR JAN CRISTOBAL, TAOS COUNTY, NEW MEXICO JEFFREY I,BOYER OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 230 MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO ". .. OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES A PLAN FOR DATA RECOVERY AT TWO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ALONG NM 522 NEAR SAN CRISTOBAL, TAOS COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Jeffrey L. Boyer with contributionsby James L. Moore Submitted by Timothy D. Maxwell Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 230 SANTA FE 1997 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY During an archaeological survey conducted by the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD) along NM 522 in Taos County, New Mexico, sixteen archaeological sites and sixtecn isolated occurrences were recorded.Of the sixteen sites, fifteen are scatters of chipped stone artifacts, including threc basalt quarry sites. The sixteenth site is a historic Hispanic acequia. The NMSHTD proposes to reconstruct this portion of NM 522, including building shoulders and extending culverts. Portions of two sites (LA 115550 [AR-03-02-07-5281 and LA 115544 [AR-03-02-07-523]) extend into proposed project limits and carmot be avoided during construction activities. LA 115550 (AR-03-02-07-528) is a basalt chipped stone artifact scatter, while LA 1 15544 (AK-03-02- 07-523) is a basalt quarry site. TheNMSHTD has requested that the Muscum of New Mexico's Oftice of Archacological Studies prepare a plan for data recovery investigations at these two sites, which are on the Questa Ranger District of the Carson National Forest. The primary focus of data recovery investigations at LA 115550 (AR-03-02-07-528) is to establish "base-line data'' for the site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Taos Valley Acequias
    Common Pool Resources and Disturbances in Social Capital: The Case of the Taos Valley Acequias November, 2012 Steven M. Smith, University of Colorado, Boulder ([email protected]) Abstract: Social capital is an important element in the successful management of a common pool resource. User groups which share high levels of trust with one another reduce the costs of monitoring and enforcing rules. While theory and games highlight the importance of repeated interactions, empirical work is limited to cross-sectional analysis in which socioeconomic attributes proxy for social capital. I focus on the role of repeated interaction and estimate the impact of introducing new users (not additional) to well-established common property institutions in Taos County, New Mexico. I build a panel data set of 25 communal irrigation systems, known as acequias, from 1984 to 2008. Using satellite imagery to assess the output of each acequia in each year, fixed effects regressions are ran to measure the impact of new users being present. Other user group characteristics are included, specifically, the number of users, the economic heterogeneity of the users, as well as the cultural homogeneity of the group. The panel data and fixed effects analysis allows me to focus on the impact of the disturbance within a system. The structure of the data also permits me to correct for the omitted variable bias which likely plagues cross-sectional analysis. Fixed effects control all variables which vary across systems but not within a system, in addition to those which vary uniformly over time. I find that the introduction of new users, lowering the social capital, does negatively impact the system, though smaller shocks have less impact and the systems are resilient overtime, returning to normal levels of output after 4 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Picuris Pueblo Through Time
    PICURIS PUEBLO THROUGH TIME: EIGHT CENTURIES OF CHANGE AT A NORTHERN RIO GRANDE PUEBLO Edited by Michael A. Adler Herbert W. Dick William P. Clements Center for Southwest Studies Southern Methodist University Picuris Pueblo Through Time PICURIS PUEBLO THROUGH TIME: EIGHT CENTURIES OF CHANGE IN A NORTHERN RIO GRANDE PUEBLO Edited by Michael A. Adler and Herbert W. Dick William P. Clements Center for Southwest Studies Southern Methodist University iii Copyright © 1999 Michael A. Adler and the William P. Clements Center for Southwest Studies, Southern Methodist University. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the expressed written consent of the publishers, with the exception of brief passages embodied in critical reviews. This publication was generously supported by the Dedman College Fund for Faculty Excellence, the Clements Center for Southwest Studies, and the Hotel Santa Fe. Printed in the U.S.A. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 ISBN 1-929531-00-1 iv DEDICATION For the People of Picuris Pueblo who have allowed others the chance to appreciate the long history of their unique home, the Hidden Valley of the Picuries and for Herbert W. Dick And Daniel Wolfman, two archaeologists who, through their work, shed light on much of ancient Picuris This volume was made possible through funding provided by Southern Methodist University Dedman College Fund for Faculty Excellence and The Hotel Santa Fe v CONTENTS CONTRIBUTORS .......................................................................................................................XIII
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft Comprehensive Plan the Village of Taos Ski
    THE VILLAGE OF TAOS SKI VALLEY FINAL DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APRIL 2017 Trail to Wheeler Peak EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2017 Village of Taos Ski Valley Comprehensive Plan was developed with careful consideration of the opportunities and constraints that impact the future growth of the community. Recent investments in infrastructure, the new Kachina Peak lift, and the construction of the Blake Hotel have triggered new interest in land development. The Village is experiencing unprecedented growth and development. The greatest challenge in the next few years is to insure new development does not erode the unique character of the Taos Ski Valley. The Village is defined by the beauty of the natural environment, the quality of the outdoor recreation experiences, and the welcoming atmosphere that the local business community and residents offer visitors. The Planning & Zoning Commission and the Village Council decided that one of the best strategies for managing new development is to prepare an updated Comprehensive Plan. This Plan will serve as a framework for evaluating new development proposals, prioritizing and investing in infrastructure, providing a variety of public services and community programs, adopting new ordinances or amending existing ordinances. This Plan incorporates many of the concepts of previous Master Plans, building on the continuity of prior strong concepts and enhancing those concepts when appropriate. The Plan is divided into seven distinct but interrelated elements: • Land Use and Natural Resources • Utilities • Transportation • Community Services • Hazard Mitigation • Recreation • Village Character In each element the following is described: • Existing Conditions • Existing Ordinances • Proposed actions from previous approved plans • Goals, objectives and strategies The Comprehensive Plan represents the values, vision and expectations of the community as they relate to the development or preservation of all land within the Village of Taos Ski Valley boundary (Zoning/ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I Planning Area, Map 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico Office of Archaeological Studies
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES THE BLINKING LIGHT SITE: A VALDEZ PHASE PIT STRUCTURE NEAR TAOS, NEW MEXICO Peter Y. Bullock With contributions by Nancy J, Akins, C. Dean Wilson, David V. Hill, Richard G. Holloway, Pamela J. McBride, Molly S. Toll, Steven A. Lakatos, and Marcy Snow Submitted by Timothy D. Maxwell Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 239 SANTA FE 1999 MEXICONEW ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Between October 16 and November 22, 1995, the Oftice of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, excavated a portion of LA 53678 for theNew Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department. A portion of the site was within the area proposed for realignment of the U.S. 64-NM 150-NM 522 intersection. LA 53678 is a Valdez phase pit structure. Excavation of the pit structure yielded a large amount of discarded prehistoric artifacts and one extramural feature. A historic component was represented by two areas of discarded Anglo-American artifacts. Specialized artifact and sample analyses provided detailed information with which to interpret the artifacts in light of research questions proposed in the data recovery plan. Submitted in fulfillment of Joint Powers AgreementD 05486 between the Officeof Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, andthe New Mexico StateHighway and Transportation Department. MNM Project No. 41.586a NMSHTD Pro-ject No. TPE-TPO-064-7 (14)250, CN 2736 NM Cultural Properties Review Committee Archaeological Excavation PermitNo. SE-111-48298 ... 111 INTRODUCTION In January and February 1986, New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD) archaeologists identifiedLA 53678, near the intersection of US 64-NM 150-NM 522 in Taos County, New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • TCLA 10-301 Church Tour
    PUBLISHED BY TAOS COUNTY LODGERS ■ ASSOCIATION AND THE TOWN OF TAOS WITH SUPPORT FROM HISTORIC CHURCHES of Taos and Northern New Mexico Chevron Mining, Inc. Questa Mine A Self-Guided Driving Tour of 24 Historic Iglesias Historic Churches first printing, 2011 taos.org/churches ■ ■ SPONSORS HISTORIC CHURCHES of Taos and Northern New Mexico Our faith is drawn from the earth. Picurís tribal member Carl Tsosie We invite you to explore the historic adobe churches of northern New Experience Southwestern charm and history Mexico. Observe the melding of 500 in the only hotel on Taos Plaza. Nineteen rooms, years of multicultural influences in their five suites, and the Plaza Penthouse, each unique, offer modern amenities amidst authentic Taos history distinctive architecture. You will see that and architecture. Walking distance to much of what these sometimes humble structures Taos has to offer. Free on-site parking. are the very heart of the communities HOTEL LA FONDA DE TAOS they serve. 108 South Plaza Please observe visitors’ etiquette 800.833.2211 • 575-758-2211 lafondataos.com throughout your journeys. Photography is generally acceptable outside (there are camera fees at some pueblos) but never inside. These architectural treasures are houses of worship. Honor their sanctity with the same respect you afford your own spiritual spaces. The traditions that created these 24 Experience Southwestern charm and history in the heart iglesias (churches) can be even better of Taos’ historic district. The Inn is on both the National understood by visiting the museums of & New Mexico Registers of Historic Places. Forty-four unique rooms and suites accompany the award-winning Taos and Chimayó.
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Taos Ski Valley Municipal Structure
    INTRODUCTION Vision The Vision of the Village of Taos Ski Valley is to create a year round economy based upon resort related commerce by improving infrastructure, preserving the environment, improving amenities for ourselves and our visitors and protecting the health, safety and welfare of the community. –2006 and 2010 Village of Taos Ski Valley Master Plans Purpose of the Plan The 2016 Village of Taos Ski Valley Comprehensive Plan (Plan) provides a series of goals, objectives and strategies, addressing both public and private improvements. When the Village Council (Council) and the Planning & Zoning Commission (Commission) need to make a decision about a development proposal, a budget, or an ordinance, they can turn to the Plan and evaluate the specific proposal against the goals and objectives and determine if the proposal implements one or more of the objectives. The staff will use the Plan as a basis for evaluating development proposals and zoning applications. The Village is experiencing unprecedented growth and development pressure. The Plan is an expression of the vision and values that will shape new growth and development for the next twenty years. The Village staff, Council, and Commission will use the Plan as a guide to coordinate infrastructure improvements and to develop the annual Infrastructure Capital Improvements Plan or other, more specific master plans.The Plan provides the framework for adopting new ordinances or amending existing ordinances that regulate unwanted development and facilitate development that is consistent
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Hydrogeology of the Southern Taos Valley, Taos County, New Mexico
    Geology and Hydrogeology of the Southern Taos Valley, Taos County, New Mexico By Paul W. Bauer, Peggy S. Johnson and Keith I. Kelson New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Tech Socorro, New Mexico 87801 Open­file Report 501 January, 1999 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN TAOS VALLEY, TAOS COUNTY, NEW MEXICO FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT Paul W. Bauer and Peggy S. Johnson New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801 (505) 835-5106 Fax (505) 835-6333 Email: [email protected] , [email protected] Keith I. Kelson William Lettis & Associates, Inc. 1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 262 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (510) 256-6070 Fax (510) 256-6076 Email: [email protected] January 1999 This project was supported by the New Mexico Office of the State Engineer/Interstate Stream Commission under Contract No. 97-550-45 (97-214-000764), entered into on May 9, 1997. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors, and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the State of New Mexico. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION A. Significance ...........................................................................................................................4 B. Scope and Objectives ...............................................................................................................4 C. Participants ...........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Aquifer Description Summary
    New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 55th Field Conference, Geology of the Taos Region, 2004, p. 391-404. 391 HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF BASIN-FILL AQUIFERS IN THE SOUTHERN SAN LUIS BASIN, NEW MEXICO PAUL DRAKOS1, JAY LAZARUS1, BILL WHITE2, CHRIS BANET2, MEGHAN HODGINS1, JIM RIESTERER1, AND JOHN SANDOVAL2 1Glorieta Geoscience Inc. (GGI), PO Box 5727, Santa Fe, NM 87502 2US Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Southwest Regional Office, 615 First St., Albuquerque, NM 87102 ABSTRACT.—The Town of Taos and Taos Pueblo conducted a joint deep drilling program to evaluate the productivity and water quality of the Tertiary basin-fill aquifer system underlying the Servilleta Formation. Testing results from a series of municipal, exploratory, subdivision, and domestic wells are also used to characterize hydrologic properties (T, K, K’, and S), and the effect of faults on groundwater flow in shallow and deep basin fill aquifers. The shallow unconfined to leaky-confined alluvial aquifer includes alluvial deposits and the underlying Servilleta Formation (Agua Azul aquifer facies). The deep leaky-confined to confined aquifer includes Tertiary age rift-fill sediments below the Servilleta Formation and is subdivided into the Chama-El Rito and Ojo Caliente aquifer facies. Although faults typically do not act as impermeable boundaries in the shallow alluvial aquifer and groundwater flow in the shallow aquifer is not significantly affected by faults, the Seco fault and several of the Los Cordovas faults act as impermeable boundaries in the deep basin fill aquifer. However, other Los Cordovas faults apparently do not affect groundwater flow in the deep aquifer, suggesting variable cementation along fault planes at depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Taos County Community Conservation Plan
    Taos County Community Conservation Plan 1 document title lorem ipsum Taos County Community Conservation Plan August 7 Printed on 100% recycled paper. © 2017 The Trust for Public Land. The Trust for Public Land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. tpl.org 2 taos county community conservation plan final report Table of contents Preface ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Why a community conservation plan? ............................................................................ 10 2. Taos County overview ....................................................................................................... 12 3. Community engagement.................................................................................................. 20 4. Mapping conservation values .......................................................................................... 31 5. Funding for community conservation ............................................................................. 42 6. Implementing the Community Conservation Plan ........................................................ 45 7. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 50 8. Participants ......................................................................................................................... 51 Online only
    [Show full text]