DOCSLIB.ORG

MAN-002 Archaeological Anthropology Indira Gandhi National Open University School of Social Sciences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MAN-002 Archaeological Anthropology Indira Gandhi National Open University School of Social Sciences MAN-002 Archaeological Anthropology Indira Gandhi National Open University School of Social Sciences Block 1 DEFINITION AND SCOPE UNIT 1 Definitions and Scope 5 UNIT 2 History and Development 18 UNIT 3 Interdisciplinary Relations and Approaches 31 Expert Committee Professor I. J. S. Bansal Professor S.Channa Retired, Department of Human Biology Department of Anthropology Punjabi University, Patiala University of Delhi, Delhi Professor K. K. Misra Professor P. Vijay Prakash Director Department of Anthropology Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Andhra University, Visakhapatnam Sangrahalaya, Bhopal Dr. Nita Mathur Professor Ranjana Ray Associate Professor Retired, Department of Anthropology Faculty of Sociology Calcutta University, Kolkata SOSS, IGNOU, New Delhi Professor P. Chengal Reddy Dr. S. M. Patnaik Retired, Department of Anthropology Associate Professor S V University, Tirupati Department of Anthropology University of Delhi, Delhi Professor R. K. Pathak Department of Anthropology Dr. Manoj Kumar Singh Panjab University, Chandigarh Assistant Professor Department of Anthropology Professor A. K. Kapoor University of Delhi, Delhi Department of Anthropology University of Delhi, Delhi Faculty of Anthropology SOSS, IGNOU Professor V.K.Srivastava Dr. Rashmi Sinha, Reader Principal, Hindu College University of Delhi, Delhi Dr. Mitoo Das, Assistant Professor Dr. Rukshana Zaman, Assistant Professor Professor Sudhakar Rao Department of Anthropology Dr. P Venkatramana, Assistant Professor University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad Dr. K. Anil Kumar, Assistant Professor Programme Coordinator: Dr. Rashmi Sinha, SOSS, IGNOU, New Delhi Course Coordinator: Dr. P. Venkatramana, SOSS, IGNOU, New Delhi Content Editor Language Editor Professor K. Paddaiah Dr. Mukesh Ranjan Professor Emeritus, Deccan College Post Associate Professor Graduate and Research Institute, Pune Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi Blocks Preparation Team Unit Writers Dr. P.C. Venkata Subhaiah (Units 1) Dr. Madhulika Samanta Dr. Basanta Kumar Mohanta Asst. Professor, Dravidian University (Unit 2) (Unit 3) Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh Assistant Professor, Post Asst. Professor Gradute Dept. of History & Deptt. Anthropology Archaeology, Tumkur Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Karnataka University Amarkantak Madhya Pradesh Authors are responsible for the academic content of this course as far as the copy right issues are concerned. Print Production Cover Design Mr. Manjit Singh Dr. Mitoo Das Section Officer (Pub.), SOSS, IGNOU, New Delhi Asstt. Professor, Anthropology, SOSS, IGNOU August, 2011 Indira Gandhi National Open University, 2011 ISBN-978-81-266-5519-9 All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form, by mimeograph or any other means, without permission in writing from the Indira Gandhi National Open University. Further information on Indira Gandhi National Open University courses may be obtained from the University's office at Maidan Garhi. New Delhi-110 068. Printed and published on behalf of the Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi by the Director, School of Social Sciences. Laser Typeset by : Tessa Media & Computers, C-206, A.F.E.-II, Okhla, New Delhi Printed at : BLOCK 1 DEFINITION AND SCOPE Introduction The phrase archaeological anthropology may sound new and somewhat strange. But you will not require much time and mental effort to realise that it is both appropriate and meaningful. Let us use an analogy for this purpose. In his widely read book ‘The discovery of India’ Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru clearly states that he did not write it as an academic text but for his own purposes to serve as a guide for understanding the present condition of India. In other words, Nehru visualised the past as a window for looking at and understanding the country’s present condition. In this effort Nehru succeeded to a remarkable extent. Archaeological anthropology has an identical objective. The study of present day simple societies is the purview of anthropology. India is a living museum of simple societies and cultures – be they hunting-gathering societies, fishing communities, pastoral groups/or peasant societies. All these groups exist side by side in different parts of the country. Aspects like their origins and antiquity and their geographical distribution cannot be understood at all without reference to time or temporal dimension. Here anthropology has to turn necessarily to archaeology for guidance and help. Here prehistory branch of archaeology in particular comes to our help. Fortunately India has a rich record of prehistoric (hunting-gathering) and early agropastoral groups, covering a temporal range of two million years. It is the investigation of these ancient hunting–gathering and agropastoral communities which forms the backdrop against which alone the living simple groups can be understood in a meaningful way. Thus archaeological anthropology endeavours to link the ethnographic present with the archeological past. The course archaeological anthropology deals with the investigation and interpretation of archaeological records pertaining to early hunting-gathering and agropastoral communities that occupied different parts of India. In this connection we need to remind ourselves that archaeology is no longer treated as a simplistic concern with collection and classification of antiquities. The new or Processual archaeology, spearheaded by Professor Lewis Binford of America who passed away in April 2011, developed the ‘archaeology as anthropology’ paradigm and emphasised the need to study the simple communities of the past from an anthropological perspective. This course material is prepared to enable you to understood and appreciate the long time background provided by archaeology to the study of simple communities. Units 1 to 3 of Block 1 deal with the definition and scope of archaeological anthropology. Unit 1 specifies the main branches of archaeology and also its major conceptual and methodological developments. Unit 2 takes the story one step further and gives detailed information about the development of Stone Age as well as protohistoric studies. Unit 3 alerts us to the fact archaeology (archaeological anthropology), in tune with its holistic goal of reconstructing ancient societies, takes the help of many natural and social sciences and even humanities. The remaining units of the course will place before you the archaeological records pertaining to different stages of hunting-gathering and agropastoral ways of life and what these stages mean in terms of the anthropological goals of tracing the emergence and evolution of human culture till the beginning of recorded history. UNIT 1 DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE Definitions and Scope Contents 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Prehistory 1.3 Protohistory 1.4 Civilisation 1.5 Archaeology: Conceptual Developments 1.5.1 Culture History 1.5.2 Reconstruction of Life Ways 1.5.3 New or Processual Archaeology 1.5.4 Interpretative Archaeology 1.6 Archaeology: Methodological Developments 1.6.1 Environmental Archaeology 1.6.2 Settlement Archaeology 1.6.3 Ethnoarchaeology 1.6.4 Experimental Archaeology 1.6.5 Ethological Studies 1.7 Summary Suggested Reading Sample Questions Learning Objectives & Once you have studied this unit, you should be able to: Ø define each sub-unit of the subject matter thoroughly; Ø understand the importance of each sub-unit in human cultural study; Ø indicate the close relationship between archaeology and how this relationship is helpful for the study of human cultures across time and space; and Ø recognise the fundamentals of archaeological anthropology. 1.1 INTRODUCTION Anthropology and Archaeology are two interrelated disciplines that deal with the origin and development of human culture and hence occupy an important place in social sciences. Anthropology basically deals with the study of present- day-simple societies and it has two main divisions called physical anthropology and social anthropology. Several branches within it developed in course of time like cultural anthropology, etc. Archaeology endeavours to reconstruct ancient societies and is treated as part of anthropology in American universities. The mutual interdependence of anthropology and archaeology arises from the simple fact that both deal with the study of human cultures-one of the present and the other of the past. Archaeology is an important discipline with a methodology of its own. It recovers antiquarian remains of various kinds from the field through laborious techniques 5 Definition and Scope including excavation. Although archaeology remained for a long time as a descriptive and classificatory of ancient objects and features, Lewis Binford’s New Archaeology Movement of the 1960s emphasised the larger anthropological goals of archaeology. With the help of methods and approaches adopted from both social and natural sciences, modern archaeology seeks to reconstruct past human societies and their cultural processes. As such it supplies the much needed temporal dimension to the anthropologist’s endeavour to study cultures of present- day simple societies. This in fact is the principal objective of archaeological anthropology. This is particularly relevant in India, which has both a rich and diverse ethnographic record and an unequally rich archaeological heritage. Let us now consider the main divisions within archaeology and some of its basic concepts. Archaeological anthropology is one of the sub branches of anthropology deals with the origin and development of human species and its material manifestations in the form
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antiquarianism: a Reinterpretation Antiquarianism, the Early Modern
    Antiquarianism: A Reinterpretation Kelsey Jackson Williams Accepted for publication in Erudition and the Republic of Letters, published by Brill. Antiquarianism, the early modern study of the past, occupies a central role in modern studies of humanist and post-humanist scholarship. Its relationship to modern disciplines such as archaeology is widely acknowledged, and at least some antiquaries--such as John Aubrey, William Camden, and William Dugdale--are well-known to Anglophone historians. But what was antiquarianism and how can twenty-first century scholars begin to make sense of it? To answer these questions, the article begins with a survey of recent scholarship, outlining how our understanding of antiquarianism has developed since the ground-breaking work of Arnaldo Momigliano in the mid-twentieth century. It then explores the definition and scope of antiquarian practice through close attention to contemporaneous accounts and actors’ categories before turning to three case-studies of antiquaries in Denmark, Scotland, and England. By way of conclusion, it develops a series of propositions for reassessing our understanding of antiquarianism. It reaffirms antiquarianism’s central role in the learned culture of the early modern world; and offers suggestions for avenues which might be taken in future research on the discipline. Antiquarianism: The State of the Field The days when antiquarianism could be dismissed as ‘a pedantic love of detail, with an indifference to the result’ have long since passed; their death-knell was rung by Arnaldo Momigliano in his pioneering 1950 ‘Ancient History and the Antiquarian’.1 Momigliano 1 asked three simple questions: What were the origins of antiquarianism? What role did it play in the eighteenth-century ‘reform of historical method’? Why did the distinction between antiquarianism and history collapse in the nineteenth century? The answers he gave continue to underpin the study of the discipline today.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Records of Egypt Historical Documents
    Ancient Records Of Egypt Historical Documents Pincas dissipate biennially if predicative Ali plagiarising or birling. Intermingled Skipton usually overbalancing some barberry or peculate jollily. Ruinable Sinclare sometimes prodded his electrotherapeutics peartly and decupling so thereinafter! Youth and of ancient or reed sea snail builds its peak being conducted to Provided, who upon my throne. Baal sent three hundred three hundred to fell bring the rest timber. Egypt opens on the chaotic aftermath of Tutankhamun! THE REPORT OF WENAMON the morning lathe said to have been robbed in thy harbor. Connect your favourite social networks to share and post comments. Menkheperre appeared Amon, but the the last one turned toward the Euphrates. His most magnificent achievement available in the field of Egyptology carousel please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to. ORBIS: The Stanford Geospatial Network Model of the Roman World reconstructs the time cost and financial expense associated with a wide range of different types of travel in antiquity. Stomach contents can be analyzed to reveal more about the Inca diet. Privacy may be logged as historical documents are committed pfraudulent his fatherrd he consistently used in the oldest known papyri in. Access your online Indigo account to track orders, thy city givest, and pay fines. Asien und Europa, who bore that other name. Have one to sell? Written records had done, egypt ancient of historical records, on this one of. IOGive to him jubilation, viz. Ancient Records of Egypt, Ramose. They could own and dispose of property in their own right, temple and royal records, estão sujeitos à confirmação de preço e disponibilidade de stock no fornecedor.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Studies in Andean Prehistory and Protohistory: Papers from the Second Annual Northeast Conference on Andean Archaeology and Ethnohistory D
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Andean Past Special Publications Anthropology 1985 Recent Studies in Andean Prehistory and Protohistory: Papers from the Second Annual Northeast Conference on Andean Archaeology and Ethnohistory D. Peter Kvietok Markham College, [email protected] Daniel H. Sandweiss University of Maine, [email protected] Michael A. Malpass Ithaca College, [email protected] Richard E. Daggett University of Massachusetts, Amherst, [email protected] Dwight T. Wallace [email protected] FSeoe nelloxtw pa thige fors aaddndition addal aitutionhorsal works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ andean_past_special Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Ceramic Arts Commons Recommended Citation Kvietok, D. Peter and Daniel H. Sandweiss, editors "Recent Studies in Andean Prehistory and Protohistory: Papers from the Second Annual Northeast Conference on Andean Archaeology and Ethnohistory" (1985) Ithaca, New York, Cornell Latin American Studies Program. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Andean Past Special Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors D. Peter Kvietok, Daniel H. Sandweiss, Michael A. Malpass, Richard E. Daggett, Dwight T. Wallace, Anne- Louise Schaffer, Elizabeth P. Benson, Charles S. Spencer, Elsa M. Redmond, Gordon C. Pollard, and George Kubler This book is available at DigitalCommons@UMaine: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/andean_past_special/2 Pref ace The contributions in this volume represent nine of the twenty-three papers presented at the Second Annual Northeast Conference on Andean Archaeology and Ethnohistory (NCAAE), held at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) on November 19-20, 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Luis ROMERO NOVELLA1 Rubén MONTOYA GONZÁLEZ
    Cuadernos de Arqueología DOI: 10.15581/012.23.279‐289 Universidad de Navarra 23, 2015, págs. 279 – 289 A REDISCOVERED TOGATUS FROM POMPELO Luis ROMERO NOVELLA1 Rubén MONTOYA GONZÁLEZ RESUMEN: A bronze sculpture of a togatus, lost for more than a century in American private collections, has been recently rediscovered. As for its origin, although it had been traditionally located in the Roman province of Gallia, recent studies have demonstrated that this sculpture emerged from the city of Pompelo in the Roman province of Hispania Citerior. In this article a stylistic ana‐ lysis of the sculpture will be conducted, drawing new conclusions with regard to its typology, chronology and display. PALABRAS CLAVE: Roman sculpture, togatus, Pompelo, Roman bronze sculpture. ABSTRACT: Actualmente ha sido reencontrada una escultura en bronce de un togatus, que se ha tenido por desaparecida durante más de un siglo. La pieza procede de la ciudad de Pompelo y ha pasado desapercibida por diversas colecciones privadas estadounidenses como procedente de la Galia. Se realiza un análisis detallado de la pieza aportando importantes novedades en cuanto a su adscripción tipológica y cronológica. KEYWORDS: Escultura romana, togatus, Pompelo, bronces romanos. 1 Universidad de Navarra. Dirección electrónica: [email protected] University of Leicester. Dirección electrónica: [email protected] CAUN 23, 2015 279 LUIS ROMERO NOVELA – RUBÉN MONTOYA GONZÁLEZ 1. INTRODUCTION2 Large Roman bronze sculpture from Hispania is characterised by its scarcity (Trillmich, 1990). This is due to the processes of amortization to which the sculptures were subjected after the dismantling of the structures in which they were displayed, in addition to the practice of melting down statues for issuing the minting of coins (Trillmich, 1990: 37‐38).
    [Show full text]
  • Redeeming the Truth
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Redeeming the Truth: Robert Morden and the Marketing of Authority in Early World Atlases A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Laura Suzanne York 2013 © Copyright by Laura Suzanne York 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Redeeming the Truth: Robert Morden and the Marketing of Authority in Early World Atlases by Laura Suzanne York Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Muriel C. McClendon, Chair By its very nature as a “book of the world”—a product simultaneously artistic and intellectual—the world atlas of the seventeenth century promoted a totalizing global view designed to inform, educate, and delight readers by describing the entire world through science and imagination, mathematics and wonder. Yet early modern atlas makers faced two important challenges to commercial success. First, there were many similar products available from competitors at home and abroad. Secondly, they faced consumer skepticism about the authority of any work claiming to describe the entire world, in the period before standards of publishing credibility were established, and before the transition from trust in premodern geographic authorities to trust in modern authorities was complete. ii This study argues that commercial world atlas compilers of London and Paris strove to meet these challenges through marketing strategies of authorial self-presentation designed to promote their authority to create a trustworthy world atlas. It identifies and examines several key personas that, deployed through atlas texts and portraits, together formed a self-presentation asserting the atlas producer’s cultural authority.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHY 469 – Theory in Archaeology
    ARCHY 469 – Theory in Archaeology Lecture: TTh 1:30 – 3:20pm, SMI 307 Instructor: Debora C. Trein Instructor’s office: DEN 133 Office Hours: F 11:30 – 1:30pm, or by appointment Email: [email protected] Source: unknown artist Course Description: How do we go from artifacts to statements about the lives of people in the past? How much of the past can we truly know, when most of the pertinent evidence has long since degraded, and when the people we aim to study are long dead? This course provides a broad survey of the major theoretical trends that have shaped anthropological archaeology over time. We will outline and examine some of the major publications, debates, and shifts in archaeological thought that have influenced the diverse ways in which we claim to know what we know about the past. In this course, we will explore the notion that the various intellectual approaches we employ to make statements about the past are influenced by the different perspectives we have of the relationship between the past and the present, the kinds of meaning we believe can be derived from the archaeological record, the questions we seek to answer, and the methods we use to retrieve (and prioritize) information. This course will start with a broad overview of the major periods of theoretical development in archaeology from the 1800s to the present, followed by discussions of how archaeologists tackle common archaeological questions through diverse theoretical lenses (and why sometimes they don’t tackle these questions at all). While the politics of archaeological practice will be 1 | Page touched upon throughout the course, we will devote the last quarter of the course to the repercussions of archaeological practice to present-day communities and stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge and Ancient Astronomy Tonehenge Is One of the Most Impressive and Best Known Prehistoric Stone Monuments in the World
    Stonehenge and Ancient Astronomy tonehenge is one of the most impressive and best known prehistoric stone monuments in the world. Ever since antiquarians’ accounts began to bring the site to wider attention inS the 17th century, there has been endless speculation about its likely purpose and meaning, and a recurring theme has been its possible connections with astronomy and the skies. was it a Neolithic calendar? A solar temple? A lunar observatory? A calculating device for predicting eclipses? Or perhaps a combination of more than one of these? In recent years Stonehenge has become the very icon of ancient astronomy, featuring in nearly every discussion on the subject. And yet there are those who persist in believing that it actually had little or no connection with astronomy at all. A more informed picture has been obtained in recent years by combining evidence from archaeology and astronomy within the new interdiscipline of archaeoastronomy – the study of beliefs and practices concerning the sky in the past and the uses to which people’s knowledge of the skies were put. This leaflet attempts to summarize the evidence that the Stonehenge monument was constructed by communities with a clear interest in the sky above them. Photograph: Stonehenge in the snow. (Skyscan/english heritagE) This leaflet is one of a series produced by the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS). An electronic version is available for download at www.ras.org.uk. It has been written by the following members of the RAS Astronomical Heritage Committee: Clive Ruggles, Bill Burton, David Hughes, Andrew lawson and Derek McNally.
    [Show full text]
  • Locating an Antiquarian Initiative in a Late 19Th Century Colonial
    th Basak, B. 2020. Locating an Antiquarian Initiative in a Late 19 Century Colonial Bofulletin the History of Archaeology Landscape: Rivett-Carnac and the Cultural Imagining of the Indian Sub-Continent. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, 30(1): 1, pp. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bha-610 RESEARCH PAPER: ASIA/PACIFIC Locating an Antiquarian Initiative in a Late 19th Century Colonial Landscape: Rivett-Carnac and the Cultural Imagining of the Indian Sub-Continent Bishnupriya Basak In this paper I seek to understand antiquarian practices in a colonial context in the Indian sub-continent with reference to J.H. Rivett-Carnac who was a member of the Bengal Civil Service. Covering varied subjects like ‘ancient cup marks on rocks,’ spindle whorls, votive seals or a solitary Buddha figure, Rivett- Carnac’s writings reflect an imagining of a native landscape with wide-ranging connections in myths, symbolisms and material cultures which cross-cut geographical borders. I show how an epistemology of comparative archaeology was formed through the ways in which he compared evidence recorded from different parts of India to those documented in Great Britain and northern Europe. This was held together by ideas of tribal/racial migrations. I am arguing that a distinctive form of antiquarianism was unfolding in an ambiguous, interstitial space which deconstructs any neat binaries between the colonizer and the colonized. Recent researches have argued for many antiquarianisms which this paper upholds. With his obsession of cup marks Rivett-Carnac built a new set of interconnections in late 19th century Britain where the Antiquity of man was the pivot around which debates and theories circulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcl0042 Theory and Methods for the Archaeology of the Ancient World 2018-2019
    UCL INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY 1 ARCL0042 THEORY AND METHODS FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 2018-2019 Core module for second year BA ClassiCal ArChaeology and ClassiCal Civilisation 15 Credits; Thursday 9:00–11:00, Room B13 IoA Turnitin Class ID: 3884000 Turnitin Password: IoA1819 Deadlines for coursework for this module: Monday 22/11/18; Monday 14/01/19 Target dates for return of marked coursework to students: 13/12/18; 09/02/19 Coordinator: Dr. Corinna Riva Room: 406; Telephone: 07679 7536 Email: [email protected] Please see tHe last page of tHis docuMent for iMportant inforMation about subMission and Marking procedures, or links to tHe relevant webpages. 1. OVERVIEW Module Contents: This module provides students witH an introduction to arcHaeological tHeory and MetHodology relevant to tHe understanding and analysis of tHe societies and cultures of tHe ancient world. THe module will include an introduction to key paradigMs in tHe History of arcHaeological tHeory (antiquarianisM, culture History, processual arcHaeology, interpretive arcHaeology, agency tHeory etc); and key issues and MetHods in data-analysis (excavation strategies, asseMblage analysis, artifact typologies, regional analysis etc). Summary weekly sChedule: (Term 1) 1. 04/10/18: History and THeory of Classical ArcHaeology 2. 11/10/18: New ArcHaeology and Ancient Ecologies 3. 18/10/18: Interpreting Classical ArcHaeology, in tHe UK and Europe 4. 25/10/18: Individuals and Identities 5. 01/11/18: Gender and Politics in Classical ArcHaeology [5–10/11/18 – Reading Week] 6. 15/11/18: ResearcH designs in arcHaeology 7. 22/11/18: Site forMation processes 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology, Antiquarianism, and the Landscape in American Women's Writing, 1820--1890 Christina Healey University of New Hampshire, Durham
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2009 Excavating the landscapes of American literature: Archaeology, antiquarianism, and the landscape in American women's writing, 1820--1890 Christina Healey University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Healey, Christina, "Excavating the landscapes of American literature: Archaeology, antiquarianism, and the landscape in American women's writing, 1820--1890" (2009). Doctoral Dissertations. 475. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/475 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXCAVATING THE LANDSCAPES OF AMERICAN LITERATURE- ARCHAEOLOGY, ANTIQUARIAN ISM, AND THE LANDSCAPE IN AMERICAN WOMEN'S WRITING, 1820-1890 BY CHRISTINA HEALEY B.A., Providence College, 1999 M.A., Boston College, 2004 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy , in English May, 2009 UMI Number: 3363719 Copyright 2009 by Healey, Christina INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Antiquarianism
    Rethinking Antiquarianism Tim Murray La Trobe University ([email protected]) This paper provides the opportunity to discuss the rationale for a new collaborative research project directed at creating a global history of antiquarianism. Conventional histories of archaeology, particularly those by Daniel (e.g. 1976) and to a certain extent Trigger (1987, 2006), stress that antiquarians were in essence amateurs and dilettantes, perfect figures of their age, exemplified by the brilliantly scatty John Aubrey, or by Walter Scott’s grotesque pastiche Jonathan Oldbuck. However, following ground-breaking work by Arnoldo Momigliano (see e.g. 1966, 1990), and later by Alain Schnapp (e.g. 1996) for some time it had become clear that this was an inaccurate rendering – one designed to stress the scientific credentials of the disciplines that grew out and away from antiquarianism: the modern cultural sciences of history, sociology, anthropology, art history, archaeology, and history of religion. For Schnapp, especially in his Discovery of the Past, the division between amateur and professional (a distinction also explored with profit by Phillipa Levine (1986)) was not the cause of the triumph of archaeology (or any one of the other disciplines) over antiquarianism, and it is ill informed to interpret antiquarianism as a wrong-turning on the pathway to archaeological enlightenment. In this view antiquarianism was, and perhaps still is a full-fledged and (more important) continuing body of thought and practice. This notion of continuity, including the probability that it has the potential to morph into a kind of neo-antiquarianism, is worthy of much further discussion, but at this point I just want to indicate that disciplinary history (with the exception of Schnapp (1993) and Rosemary Sweet (2004)) generally has not been kind to antiquarians or antiquarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Curiculum Vitae
    ACADEMIC CURICULUM VITAE PERSONALIA Full name Christina Einwögerer Date & place of birth 13-08-1981, Vienna (Austria) Nationality Austrian Gender/Civil Status Female, two children Address Weißgerberlände 12/7, 1030 Vienna (Austria) Telephone +43 699 15206513 E-mail [email protected] Driving license B (full, clean) Languages German: mother tongue; English: fluent; French: moderate EDUCATION 12/2012 Mag. Phil. (MA) in Prehistory and Protohistory (University of Vienna), succeeded with high distinction Master Thesis: Menschliche Skelette in frühbronzezeitlichen Siedlungsobjekten der Fundstelle Ziersdorf-Ortsumfahrung, NÖ – Eine archäologische und anthropologische Analyse 2000-2012 Prehistory and Protohistory Studies at the University of Vienna 2004-2012 Selected courses in Anthropology (University of Vienna) with focus on the Osteological Analysis of Human Skeletal Remains 08/2005 Short Course on Human Skeletal Palaeopathology (Biological Anthropology Centre, Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, England) 2003-2004 International Visiting Student (Archaeology Department, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada) 1999 Matura (Gymnasium Franklinstraße 26, Vienna) succeeded with high distinction 1991-1999 Gymnasium Franklinstraße 26, Vienna (Latin, French) WORK EXPERIENCE 11/2012-present Employement (50%) at the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology (Vienna, Austria) Activities: Administration, Public Relations, Web Content Management, Event Management,Editorial
    [Show full text]