DRAFT: 1/31/2007 New York State Early Detection Invasive Plants by Region REGION: CRISP
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants
E TG/NASTU(proj.3) ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2018-08-03 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS Geneva DRAFT * WATERCRESS UPOV Code(s): NASTU_MIC; NASTU_OFF; NASTU_STE Nasturtium microphyllum Boenn. ex Rchb.; Nasturtium officinale R. Br.; Nasturtium xsterile (Airy Shaw) Oefelein GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY prepared by experts from United Kingdom to be considered by the Technical Working Party for Vegetables at its fifty-second session, to be held in Beijing, China, from 2018-09-17 to 2018-09-21 Disclaimer: this document does not represent UPOV policies or guidance Alternative names:* Botanical name English French German Spanish Nasturtium microphyllum One-row watercress Boenn. ex Rchb. Nasturtium officinale R. Br., Watercress cresson de fontaine; Brunnenkresse berro Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum cresson d'eau (L.) Hayek Nasturtium xsterile (Airy Shaw) Oefelein, Nasturtium microphyllum x Nasturtium officinale, Rorippa microphylla x Rorippa nasturtium- aquaticum The purpose of these guidelines (“Test Guidelines”) is to elaborate the principles contained in the General Introduction (document TG/1/3), and its associated TGP documents, into detailed practical guidance for the harmonized examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) and, in particular, to identify appropriate characteristics for the examination of DUS and production of harmonized variety descriptions. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS These Test Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the General Introduction and its associated TGP documents. * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.] TG/NASTU(proj.3) Watercress, 2018-08-03 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. -
Invasive Weeds of the Appalachian Region
$10 $10 PB1785 PB1785 Invasive Weeds Invasive Weeds of the of the Appalachian Appalachian Region Region i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………...i How to use this guide…………………………………ii IPM decision aid………………………………………..1 Invasive weeds Grasses …………………………………………..5 Broadleaves…………………………………….18 Vines………………………………………………35 Shrubs/trees……………………………………48 Parasitic plants………………………………..70 Herbicide chart………………………………………….72 Bibliography……………………………………………..73 Index………………………………………………………..76 AUTHORS Rebecca M. Koepke-Hill, Extension Assistant, The University of Tennessee Gregory R. Armel, Assistant Professor, Extension Specialist for Invasive Weeds, The University of Tennessee Robert J. Richardson, Assistant Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, North Caro- lina State University G. Neil Rhodes, Jr., Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, The University of Ten- nessee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank all the individuals and organizations who have contributed their time, advice, financial support, and photos to the crea- tion of this guide. We would like to specifically thank the USDA, CSREES, and The Southern Region IPM Center for their extensive support of this pro- ject. COVER PHOTO CREDITS ii 1. Wavyleaf basketgrass - Geoffery Mason 2. Bamboo - Shawn Askew 3. Giant hogweed - Antonio DiTommaso 4. Japanese barberry - Leslie Merhoff 5. Mimosa - Becky Koepke-Hill 6. Periwinkle - Dan Tenaglia 7. Porcelainberry - Randy Prostak 8. Cogongrass - James Miller 9. Kudzu - Shawn Askew Photo credit note: Numbers in parenthesis following photo captions refer to the num- bered photographer list on the back cover. HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE Tabs: Blank tabs can be found at the top of each page. These can be custom- ized with pen or marker to best suit your method of organization. Examples: Infestation present On bordering land No concern Uncontrolled Treatment initiated Controlled Large infestation Medium infestation Small infestation Control Methods: Each mechanical control method is represented by an icon. -
Management of Invasive Plants and Pests of Illinois
MANAGEMENT OF INVASIVE PLANTS AND PESTS OF ILLINOIS AUTHORS Tricia Bethke, Forest Pest Outreach Coordinator, The Morton Arboretum Christopher Evans, Extension Forester, UIUC NRES ORIGINAL AUTHOR Karla Gage, Southern Illinois University 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was funded, in part, through a grant from the Illinois Forestry Development Council (ifdc.nres.illinois.edu). Management of Invasive Plants and Pests of Illinois is an update and expansion of the original Management of Invasive Plants of Southern Illinois. The authors wish to acknowledge the Illinois Wildlife Preservation Fund, which supported the creation of the original document. The authors wish to thank The Morton Arboretum and Kurt Dreisilker, Mark Hochsprung, Mark McKinney and Clair Ryan for their edits and review of this document. The authors wish to thank The Morton Arboretum’s Natural Areas Conservation Training Program, which is generously funded by the Tellabs Foundation, for support, in part, of the publication of this guide. The authors wish to thank the USDA Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service which supported, in part, the update and publication of this document. The authors wish to thank the River to River Cooperative Weed Management Area and Kevin Rohling for assisting in the development of this publication. The Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences and Extension Forestry at the University of Illinois would like to thank and acknowledge the Renewable Resources Extension Act (RREA) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture -
Phenology Calendar (PDF)
Phenology Calendar Treatment for Common Invasive Plants in Northeast Illinois Name January February March April May June July August September October November December Mowing Do Not Mow Flowering Spray foliar herbicide Burn Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) Hand pull, dig Spray herbicide on cut stems Alnus glutinosa (black alder) Special Thanks to: Ed Hedborn - The Morton Arboretum Floyd Catchpole - Will County FPD Rob Littiken - TNC Kankakee Sands Becky Collings - The Field Museum Anthriscus sylvestris (wild chervil) Berberis thunbergii (Japanese barberry) Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos (syn. Centaurea maculosa /bieberstein /steube ) (spotted knapweed) Conium maculatum (poison hemlock) Dipsacus laciniatus (cut-leaf teasel) Dipsacus sylvestris /fullonum (common teasel) Eleagnus angustifolia (Russian olive) Elaeagnus umbellatus (Autumn olive) 1 Phenology Calendar Treatment for Common Invasive Plants in Northeast Illinois Name January February March April May June July August September October November December Mowing Do Not Mow Flowering Spray foliar herbicide Euonymus alatus (burning bush) Burn Hand pull, dig Spray herbicide on cut stems Euonymus fortunei (winter creeper) Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge) Frangula alnus (syn. Rhamnus frangula ) (glossy buckthorn) Hemerocallis spp. (daylily) Humulus japonicus (Japanese hops) Lespedeza sericea /cuneata (silky bush clover) Lonicera maackii (Amur honeysuckle) Lonicera tartarica -xylosteum complex (Tatarian honeysuckle) Lotus corniculatus (bird’s foot trefoil) Lysimachia nummularia (moneywort -
June 23, 2012
Maryland Native Plant Society Plant Lists We offer these lists to individuals and groups to enhance the enjoyment and study of plants of different locations in Maryland and nearby states. Their accuracy has not been verified by the Maryland Native Plant Society. SAVAGE RIVER STATE FOREST, GARRETT COUNTY, MD This list records plants seen during a field trip to the Savage River State Forest on June 23, 2012. Field trip led by Wade Dorsey and Liz McDowell. Plant list by Liz McDowell. Nomenclature follows the USDA Plant Database at http://plants.usda.gov (January 2012). Synonyms are footnoted for some species. Acer pensylvanicum Striped maple Aceraceae Acer rubrum Red maple Aceraceae Acer saccharum Sugar maple Aceraceae Achillea millefolium Yarrow Asteraceae Actaea racemosa1 Black cohosh Ranunculaceae Alliaria petiolata Garlic mustard Brassicaceae Amelanchier sp. Shadbush Rosaceae Apocynum cannabinum Indian hemp Apocynaceae Arabis canadensis Sicklepod Brassicaceae Athyrium filix-femina Lady fern Dryopteridaceae Barbarea vulgaris Common wintercress Brassicaceae Berberis thunbergii Japanese barberry Berberidaceae Betula lenta Black birch Betulaceae Carex platyphylla Broad-leaved sedge Cyperaceae Carya glabra Pignut hickory Juglandaceae Carya ovata Shagbark hickory Juglandaceae Castanea dentata American chestnut Fagaceae Chelidonium majus Celandine Papaveraceae Circaea lutetiana Enchanter’s nightshade Onagraceae Clinopodium vulgare2 Wild basil Lamiaceae Cypripedium acaule Pink lady’s-slipper Orchidaceae Dennstaedtia punctilobula Hay-scented -
Illinois Exotic Species List
Exotic Species in Illinois Descriptions for these exotic species in Illinois will be added to the Web page as time allows for their development. A name followed by an asterisk (*) indicates that a description for that species can currently be found on the Web site. This list does not currently name all of the exotic species in the state, but it does show many of them. It will be updated regularly with additional information. Microbes viral hemorrhagic septicemia Novirhabdovirus sp. West Nile virus Flavivirus sp. Zika virus Flavivirus sp. Fungi oak wilt Ceratocystis fagacearum chestnut blight Cryphonectria parasitica Dutch elm disease Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and Ophiostoma ulmi late blight Phytophthora infestans white-nose syndrome Pseudogymnoascus destructans butternut canker Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum Plants okra Abelmoschus esculentus velvet-leaf Abutilon theophrastii Amur maple* Acer ginnala Norway maple Acer platanoides sycamore maple Acer pseudoplatanus common yarrow* Achillea millefolium Japanese chaff flower Achyranthes japonica Russian knapweed Acroptilon repens climbing fumitory Adlumia fungosa jointed goat grass Aegilops cylindrica goutweed Aegopodium podagraria horse chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum fool’s parsley Aethusa cynapium crested wheat grass Agropyron cristatum wheat grass Agropyron desertorum corn cockle Agrostemma githago Rhode Island bent grass Agrostis capillaris tree-of-heaven* Ailanthus altissima slender hairgrass Aira caryophyllaea Geneva bugleweed Ajuga genevensis carpet bugleweed* Ajuga reptans mimosa -
Lake County Seed Collection Guide
/DNH&RXQW\,OOLQRLV86$ /DNH&RXQW\6HHG&ROOHFWLRQ*XLGH 1 6XPPHUPrairie)RUEV .HOO\6FKXOW]'DOH6KLHOGV /DNH&RXQW\)RUHVW3UHVHUYH'LVWULFW9ROXQWHHU6WHZDUGVKLS1HWZRUN Photos21'-6KLHOGV3URGXFHGE\'DOH6KLHOGV .HOO\6FKXOW]/DNH&RXQW\)RUHVW3UHVHUYH'LVWULFW>NVFKXOW]#OFISGRUJ@ .HOO\6FKXOW] 1 &&%<1&/LFHQVHGZRUNVDUHIUHHWRXVHVKDUHUHPL[ZLWKDWWULEXWLRQEXWGRHVQRWSHUPLWFRPPHUFLDOXVHRI WKHRULJLQDOZRUN >ILHOGJXLGHVILHOGPXVHXPRUJ@>5] version 2 3/2021 The pictures in this guide were assembled to help restoration volunteers identify ripe seeds of native species. The squares are 1” on a side in the indoor shots with white squares on the gray background. The seed shots are on a metric scale (mm divisions). Names used are those of Flora of the Chicago Region by Gerould Wilhelm and Laura Rericha. Our heartfelt thanks go to Laurie Ryan of the McHenry County Conservation District for her review. Harvest notes Successful collection of viable seed requires an understanding of when to collect, how to collect, how to store, how to process, and when to sow. Determine these criteria and have a plan before harvesting seeds, especially of uncommon species. The species are listed in order of the photo dates, so will give an approximate time for collection, but collection dates vary according to local weather effects on blooming and pollinators; proximity to Lake Michigan; slopes; sun vs shade, etc. Many seed harvest charts are available with collection dates, but it is best to scout each site rather than relying on historic dates. Seeds collected before mid-June should be sown right away. They are intolerant of dry storage and most of them require both warm & cold treatments to stimulate germination. Late June seeds are more tolerant of dry storage; sow these seeds soon, but you can let them dry for a few weeks. -
CZECH REPUBLIC: COUNTRY REPORT to the FAO INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE on PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES (Leipzig 1996)
CZECH REPUBLIC: COUNTRY REPORT TO THE FAO INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES (Leipzig 1996) Prepared by: Ladislav Dotlac˘il Karel Vanc˘ura Prague, April 1995 BANGLADESH country report 2 Note by FAO This Country Report has been prepared by the national authorities in the context of the preparatory process for the FAO International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, Leipzig, Germany, 17-23 June 1996. The Report is being made available by FAO as requested by the International Technical Conference. However, the report is solely the responsibility of the national authorities. The information in this report has not been verified by FAO, and the opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views or policy of FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of the material and maps in this document do not imply the expression of any option whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. BANGLADESH country report 3 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, ITS AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY SECTORS 6 1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION 6 1.2 AGRICULTURE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC 8 1.3 FORESTRY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC 10 CHAPTER 2 INDIGENOUS PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES 12 2.1 FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES 12 2.2 WILD SPECIES AND WILD RELATIVES OF CROP PLANTS 13 2.3 LANDRACES (FARMERS‘ VARIETIES) AND OLD CULTIVARS 15 CHAPTER -
The Colletotrichum Destructivum Species Complex – Hemibiotrophic Pathogens of Forage and field Crops
available online at www.studiesinmycology.org STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY 79: 49–84. The Colletotrichum destructivum species complex – hemibiotrophic pathogens of forage and field crops U. Damm1*, R.J. O'Connell2, J.Z. Groenewald1, and P.W. Crous1,3,4 1CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2UMR1290 BIOGER-CPP, INRA-AgroParisTech, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France; 3Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa; 4Wageningen University and Research Centre (WUR), Laboratory of Phytopathology, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands *Correspondence: U. Damm, [email protected], Present address: Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz, Germany. Abstract: Colletotrichum destructivum is an important plant pathogen, mainly of forage and grain legumes including clover, alfalfa, cowpea and lentil, but has also been reported as an anthracnose pathogen of many other plants worldwide. Several Colletotrichum isolates, previously reported as closely related to C. destructivum, are known to establish hemibiotrophic infections in different hosts. The inconsistent application of names to those isolates based on outdated species concepts has caused much taxonomic confusion, particularly in the plant pathology literature. A multilocus DNA sequence analysis (ITS, GAPDH, CHS-1, HIS3, ACT, TUB2) of 83 isolates of C. destructivum and related species revealed 16 clades that are recognised as separate species in the C. destructivum complex, which includes C. destructivum, C. fuscum, C. higginsianum, C. lini and C. tabacum. Each of these species is lecto-, epi- or neotypified in this study. Additionally, eight species, namely C. americae- borealis, C. antirrhinicola, C. bryoniicola, C. -
New York Non-Native Plant Invasiveness Ranking Form
NEW YORK NON-NATIVE PLANT INVASIVENESS RANKING FORM Scientific name: Digitalis lanata Ehrh. USDA Plants Code: DILA3 Common names: Grecian foxglove Native distribution: Southeastern Europe Date assessed: February 1, 2010 Assessors: Steve Glenn, Gerry Moore Reviewers: LIISMA SRC Date Approved: March 10, 2010 Form version date: 10 July 2009 New York Invasiveness Rank: Insignificant (Relative Maximum Score <40.00) Distribution and Invasiveness Rank (Obtain from PRISM invasiveness ranking form) PRISM Status of this species in each PRISM: Current Distribution Invasiveness Rank 1 Adirondack Park Invasive Program Not Assessed Not Assessed 2 Capital/Mohawk Not Assessed Not Assessed 3 Catskill Regional Invasive Species Partnership Not Assessed Not Assessed 4 Finger Lakes Not Assessed Not Assessed 5 Long Island Invasive Species Management Area Not Present Low 6 Lower Hudson Not Assessed Not Assessed 7 Saint Lawrence/Eastern Lake Ontario Not Assessed Not Assessed 8 Western New York Not Assessed Not Assessed Invasiveness Ranking Summary Total (Total Answered*) Total (see details under appropriate sub-section) Possible 1 Ecological impact 40 (30) 3 2 Biological characteristic and dispersal ability 25 (22) 13 3 Ecological amplitude and distribution 25 (25) 13 4 Difficulty of control 10 (10) 3 b a Outcome score 100 (87) 32 † Relative maximum score 36.78 § New York Invasiveness Rank Insignificant (Relative Maximum Score <40.00) * For questions answered “unknown” do not include point value in “Total Answered Points Possible.” If “Total Answered Points Possible” is less than 70.00 points, then the overall invasive rank should be listed as “Unknown.” †Calculated as 100(a/b) to two decimal places. §Very High >80.00; High 70.00−80.00; Moderate 50.00−69.99; Low 40.00−49.99; Insignificant <40.00 Not Assessable: not persistent in NY, or not found outside of cultivation. -
Quo Vadis Cardiac Glycoside Research?
toxins Review Quo vadis Cardiac Glycoside Research? Jiˇrí Bejˇcek 1, Michal Jurášek 2 , VojtˇechSpiwok 1 and Silvie Rimpelová 1,* 1 Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, Prague 6, Czech Republic; [email protected] (J.B.); [email protected] (V.S.) 2 Department of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 3, Prague 6, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-220-444-360 Abstract: AbstractCardiac glycosides (CGs), toxins well-known for numerous human and cattle poisoning, are natural compounds, the biosynthesis of which occurs in various plants and animals as a self-protective mechanism to prevent grazing and predation. Interestingly, some insect species can take advantage of the CG’s toxicity and by absorbing them, they are also protected from predation. The mechanism of action of CG’s toxicity is inhibition of Na+/K+-ATPase (the sodium-potassium pump, NKA), which disrupts the ionic homeostasis leading to elevated Ca2+ concentration resulting in cell death. Thus, NKA serves as a molecular target for CGs (although it is not the only one) and even though CGs are toxic for humans and some animals, they can also be used as remedies for various diseases, such as cardiovascular ones, and possibly cancer. Although the anticancer mechanism of CGs has not been fully elucidated, yet, it is thought to be connected with the second role of NKA being a receptor that can induce several cell signaling cascades and even serve as a growth factor and, thus, inhibit cancer cell proliferation at low nontoxic concentrations. -
Checklist Flora of the Former Carden Township, City of Kawartha Lakes, on 2016
Hairy Beardtongue (Penstemon hirsutus) Checklist Flora of the Former Carden Township, City of Kawartha Lakes, ON 2016 Compiled by Dale Leadbeater and Anne Barbour © 2016 Leadbeater and Barbour All Rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or database, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, without written permission of the authors. Produced with financial assistance from The Couchiching Conservancy. The City of Kawartha Lakes Flora Project is sponsored by the Kawartha Field Naturalists based in Fenelon Falls, Ontario. In 2008, information about plants in CKL was scattered and scarce. At the urging of Michael Oldham, Biologist at the Natural Heritage Information Centre at the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Dale Leadbeater and Anne Barbour formed a committee with goals to: • Generate a list of species found in CKL and their distribution, vouchered by specimens to be housed at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, making them available for future study by the scientific community; • Improve understanding of natural heritage systems in the CKL; • Provide insight into changes in the local plant communities as a result of pressures from introduced species, climate change and population growth; and, • Publish the findings of the project . Over eight years, more than 200 volunteers and landowners collected almost 2000 voucher specimens, with the permission of landowners. Over 10,000 observations and literature records have been databased. The project has documented 150 new species of which 60 are introduced, 90 are native and one species that had never been reported in Ontario to date.