Culture, Strucutre, and Race in Pick-Up Basketball

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Culture, Strucutre, and Race in Pick-Up Basketball CULTURE, STRUCUTRE, AND RACE IN PICK-UP BASKETBALL: EVERYDAY HOOPS INSIDE A PREDOMINANTLY WHITE UNIVERSITY STUDENT RECREATION CENTER A Dissertation by KENNETH SEAN CHAPLIN Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Reuben May Committee Members, Joe Feagin Sarah Gatson John Singer Head of Department, Jane Sell May 2015 Major Subject: Sociology Copyright 2015 Kenneth Sean Chaplin ABSTRACT When an observer looks at pick-up basketball in an integrated space it appears like groups of players are playing based simply on racial difference, but a deeper look reveals other factors that influence how these apparent racial dynamics play out. In this dissertation, I break down the types of norms and rules of pick-up basketball culture, analyze how those norms and rules are tied to structure, and demonstrate the influence of these factors on racial dynamics. I go beyond a simple understanding of race as it plays out in this particular space for pick-up basketball to show, using sociological concepts, the nuanced ways in which everyday people involve themselves in routine kinds of informal recreational activities. I found that players used norms as a way to make and enforce social rules and cultural customs, and that players used these rules and customs to informally organize large and small groups in ways significantly related to race. I also found that players used race in overt and covert ways, and as interactive strategies to structure particular games and to manipulate micro pick-up basketball cultures on particular courts and sidelines. ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my wife (Sunaina), parents (Kenneth and Diana), sisters and brother-in-law (Charmaine, Erica, and Andrew), and my nieces and nephews (Jake, Ariel, Alexis, Joshua, and Caleb). Thank you for enduring my impatience, distance, and neuroses, while still continuing to love me. I also dedicate this dissertation to my grandmother Doris Granny-Chin, and my Uncle Lincoln and Aunt Pat; without you I could not have endure this process. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my mentor, chair, and friend Reuben May and his wife Lyndell May who helped me in every possible way to finish this dissertation. I also couldn’t have completed my dissertation without my grind-out partner, Frank Ortega and his wife Cindy for their drive, patience, and persistent in pushing through the midnight hours to complete this project. I would like to thank my committee members Joe Feagin, Sarah Gatson, and John Singer for pushing me to recognize that the only way good research and clear thinking can be achieved is through hard work and dedication to getting to know and understanding the research, literature, and the people that comprise research participants. Finally, I want to acknowledge Mark Fossett (the previous Department Chair of Sociology) and Jane Sell (the current Department Chair of Sociology) for helping me to endure and persevere. Specifically, I would like to thank Christi Ramirez (the Assistant to the Department Head) for her quick responses in my times of academic crisis. Without Christi, I could not have handled most of the official university matters in a timely manner. To everyone else associated with the Texas A&M University Department of Sociology, I appreciate all the social support I was given during my time as a graduate student. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. ii DEDICATION .............................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. v CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 About this Study ............................................................................................ 1 About the Literature and Research ................................................................ 3 About the Text ............................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER II A SOCIOLOGY OF PICK-UP BASKETBALL .................................... 9 What a Sociology of Sport Is ......................................................................... 9 Why Study Sports – What Is so Important about Sports ............................... 11 Why Study Particular Sports and Sports Players like Pick-up Basketball and Pick-up Basketball Players ..................................................................... 13 What Pick-up Basketball Is, and What it Is Not ............................................ 16 Some Significant Similarities and Differences between Pick-up Basketball And Organized Basketball ............................................................................. 19 Who Some Pick-up Basketball Players are .................................................. 21 Pick-up Basketball as a Contested Social Activity that occurs in Contested Social Space ................................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER III PLACE, SPACE, AND PICK-UP BASKETBALL .............................. 26 College Station, Texas ................................................................................... 27 TAMU in College Station: Student Life and Campus Culture ...................... 31 The TAMU SRC ........................................................................................... 36 Pick-up Basketball Players Inside of the TAMU SRC ................................. 37 CHAPTER IV PLAYERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF PLACE AND SPACE ..................... 40 Players’ Perceptions and Interpretations of Emotional, Physical and Social Fulfillment ..................................................................................................... 40 Players’ Perceptions and Interpretations of Safety ........................................ 44 Players’ Perceptions and Interpretations of Competition .............................. 48 Players’ Perceptions and Interpretations of Privilege.................................... 52 v Discussion ...................................................................................................... 57 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 58 CHAPTER V CULTURES AND SUBCULTURES OF PICK-UP BASKETBALL PLAYERS INSIDE OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY STUDENT RECREATION CENTER ........................................................................................................................ 60 About Pick-up Basketball Cultures and Subcultures .................................... 62 TAMU SRC Cultures and Subcultures of Pick-up Basketball Players ......... 63 Pick-up Basketball Players’ Use of Material Culture .................................... 65 Competition and Cooperation as Large Group Cultures and Subcultures..... 74 Competition and Cooperation as Small Group Cultures and Subcultures .... 79 Players’ Use of Speech, Language, and Demeanor as Small Group Relations and Social Bonds ........................................................................... 88 Social Bonds from Everyday Spontaneous Pick-up Basketball Practices ..... 93 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 103 CHAPTER VI MICRO-LEVEL STRUCTURES OF PICK-UP BASKETBALL PLAYERS AND GROUPS ........................................................................................... 106 Players and Group’s Relationships and Social Relations as Micro-level Structures ....................................................................................................... 107 What is What, and Who is Who: Players and Group’s Relationships and Social Relations ............................................................................................. 109 Networks as Micro-level Pick-up Basketball Structures ............................... 122 Players and Groups’ Networks: Games within Games ................................. 126 Imputing Status and Roles as Informal Leadership and Norms .................... 139 Creating Informal Leadership: Deference and Conformity ........................... 142 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 152 CHAPTER VII RACE AND RACE RELATIONS AS MICRO-LEVEL SOCIAL FORCES OF PICK-UP BASKETBALL PLAYERS .................................... 154 Black and White American Socio-historical Experiences in Basketball ....... 156 Race and Natural Athleticism: Players’ Aptitude.......................................... 171 Black and White Players’ Attitudes............................................................... 178 TAMU and non-TAMU Student Players: Race and Social Class ................. 194 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 211 CHAPTER VIII COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY ..................................................... 217 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 220 vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION When an observer looks
Recommended publications
  • Red Raider Ballhandling Programs (Bonus Workouts- Beyond 2020 Shooting Program Workout)
    -2020 RED RAIDER BONUS WORKOUTS- All players can benefit from the various workouts listed below. You may choose to do these to provide variety to your workout regimen and can be done in addition to the 2020 Shooting Programs. RED RAIDER BALLHANDLING PROGRAMS (BONUS WORKOUTS- BEYOND 2020 SHOOTING PROGRAM WORKOUT) 1. Two Ball Commando-Stationary (30 seconds each) a. Same-Knee High b. Same-Ankle High c. Same-Head High d. Alternate-Knee High e. Right High Left Low f. Left High Right Low g. Chase (Figure 8-Clockwise) h. Chase (Figure 8-Counter Clockwise) 2. Two Ball Active-Full Court-Down and Back-Game Speed/Game Intensity a. Same-Knee High b. Alternate-Knee High c. Alternate Zig- Zag-Knee High d. Alternate Zig- Zag with a Regular Cross-Knee High e. Alternate Zig- Zag with a Cross Behind the Back-Knee High f. Speed Dribble-Thigh High 3. Tight Chairs/Spread Chairs Dribble the distance from the baseline to the top of the key performing each the moves listed below 4 times within that distance and then finish with a jump stop where you chin the ball. You should begin with your strong hand and then come back with your weak hand. A variation of this drill is doing each move 4 times between the baseline and half court. (Hesitation/Inside-Out/Inside-Out with a Cross/Sit and Split/Regular Crossover) 4. 2 Ball-Chris Paul Players will start by dribbling 2 balls and then will move forward, backward, left and right and randomly changing direction as they progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Basketball Study Guide
    Basketball Study Guide westlake.k12.oh.us/.../#1702BA Grotthuss History Dr. James Naismith was a physician, clergyman and professor of Physical Education. He was an instructor at the YMCA in Springfield, Mass. In 1891 he asked a custodian to nail two peach baskets to a gymnasium balcony, which just happened to be 10 feet high. This was the beginning of Basketball. 1893-After metal baskets replace wooden peach baskets, a bag made of netting attached to a metal hoop is first used 1894-Backboards are first used, preventing spectators from reaching over the balcony and interfering with shots. 1897-Teams of five players on a side become standard 1908-Personal fouls limited to five 1918-Backboards placed two feet into the court 1923-Penalizing violations such as traveling and double dribble with loss of possession instead of awarding free throws to defending team 1932-Introduction of the 10-second rule for getting the ball across mid-court. 1937-Elimination of the center jump after each score 1939-Backboards placed four feet into the court 1944-Allowing unlimited substitution 1953-One and one free throw rule 1954-NBA adopts 24-second shot clock 1955-Bonus free throws allowed only if first one is made 1968-Dunk shot banned in college 1977-Dunk shot reinstated 1985-NCAA adopts 45-second shot clock 1986-NCAA adopts the 3 point shot Players There are 5 players on an official basketball team, (1 center, 2 forwards, and 2 guards). These players play offense and defense on both ends of the court. img.sparknotes.com/. /basketball www.ssqq.com/stories/ images/sports%20basketba The Court! This diagram shows the standard measurements for American high school, college, and professional basketball courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The qualify of this reproduction is dependent upon the qualify of the copy submitted. Broken or indisfinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are misang pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an ad&tional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zed) Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NATION: THE SOCIAL HISTORY OF MIDNIGHT BASKETBALL A DOCTORAL DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By VIVIAN L.
    [Show full text]
  • Play by Play JPN 87 Vs 71 FRA FIRST QUARTER
    Saitama Super Arena Basketball さいたまスーパーアリーナ バスケットボール / Basketball Super Arena de Saitama Women 女子 / Femmes FRI 6 AUG 2021 Semifinal Start Time: 20:00 準決勝 / Demi-finale Play by Play プレーバイプレー / Actions de jeux Game 48 JPN 87 vs 71 FRA (14-22, 27-12, 27-16, 19-21) Game Duration: 1:31 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Scoring by 5 min intervals: JPN 9 14 28 41 56 68 78 87 FRA 11 22 27 34 44 50 57 71 Quarter Starters: FIRST QUARTER JPN 8 TAKADA M 13 MACHIDA R 27 HAYASHI S 52 MIYAZAWA Y 88 AKAHO H FRA 5 MIYEM E 7 GRUDA S 10 MICHEL S 15 WILLIAMS G 39 DUCHET A Game JPN - Japan Score Diff. FRA - France Time 10:00 8 TAKADA M Jump ball lost 7 GRUDA S Jump ball won 15 WILLIAMS G 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup made (2 9:41 0-2 2 Pts) 8 TAKADA M 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 13 9:19 2-2 0 MACHIDA R Assist (1) 9:00 52 MIYAZAWA Y Defensive rebound (1) 10 MICHEL S 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed 52 MIYAZAWA Y 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 13 8:40 4-2 2 MACHIDA R Assist (2) 8:40 10 MICHEL S Personal foul, 1 free throw awarded (P1,T1) 8:40 52 MIYAZAWA Y Foul drawn 8:40 52 MIYAZAWA Y Free Throw made 1 of 1 (3 Pts) 5-2 3 8:28 52 MIYAZAWA Y Defensive rebound (2) 10 MICHEL S 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed 8:11 52 MIYAZAWA Y 3PtsFG missed 15 WILLIAMS G Defensive rebound (1) 8:03 5-4 1 15 WILLIAMS G 2PtsFG fast break, Driving Layup made (4 Pts) 88 AKAHO H 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 13 7:53 7-4 3 MACHIDA R Assist (3) 7:36 39 DUCHET A 2PtsFG outside paint, Pullup Jump Shot missed 7:34 Defensive Team rebound (1) 7:14 13 MACHIDA
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanical Analysis of the Jump Shot in Basketball
    Journal of Human Kinetics volume 42/2014, 73‐79 DOI: 10.2478/hukin‐2014‐0062 73 Section I – Kinesiology Biomechanical Analysis of the Jump Shot in Basketball by Artur Struzik1, Bogdan Pietraszewski1, Jerzy Zawadzki1 Basketball players usually score points during the game using the jump shot. For this reason, the jump shot is considered to be the most important element of technique in basketball and requires a high level of performance. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the lower limbs during a jump shot without the ball and a countermovement jump without an arm swing. The differences between variables provide information about the potential that an athlete can utilise during a game when performing a jump shot. The study was conducted among 20 second‐league basketball players by means of a Kistler force plate and the BTS SMART system for motion analysis. The variables measured included the take‐off time, mean power, peak power, relative mean power, jump height, maximum landing force and calculated impact ratio. Surprisingly, more advantageous variables were found for the jump shot. This finding suggests a very high performance level in the jump shot in the studied group and a maximum utilisation of their motor abilities. Both types of jumps were characterised by high mean and peak power values and average heights. The high forces at landing, which result in considerable impact ratios, may have prompted the studied group to land softly. Use of the countermovement jump without an arm swing is recommended to assess and predict the progression of player’s jumping ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Dribblers Rules
    ​Kindergarten/First Grade Rules 1. To allow the game to be played, double dribbling and traveling will be left to the discretion of the head coaches. Both violations should be called minimally to not at all at the beginning of the season. By seasons end, more calls should be called for major violations for double dribbling and traveling, but again it will be up to the coaches in charge of the games. 2. In jump ball situations, the possession will alternate. 3. No child may foul out. If a child is perpetually fouling the other team, she or he should be removed from the game for an appropriate period of time to adjust their game play. 4. All fouls will result in the ball being passed back into play(no foul shots). 5. All defense must be played from inside the three point arc. Man on Man or Zone defense is acceptable, but no double teaming or trapping is allowed. 6. Defenders may not steal the basketball from a player dribbling or holding the basketball unless the offencive player possessing the ball has at least one foot in the lane(the paint). 7. Any pass made within the arc may be intercepted. 8. Blocked shots may only occur when the defensive player is between the shooter and the basket. The defender may not jump and must have both hands straight above the head in a proper defensive position. A shot may not be blocked from the side or behind as well. 9. Two 20 minute halves and a 5 minute half time.
    [Show full text]
  • Lou Carnesecca: Lessons for Today's Executive That Goes Beyond Basketball
    Journal of Sports and Games Volume 1, Issue 2, 2019, PP 23-29 ISSN 2642-8466 Lou Carnesecca: Lessons for Today's Executive that Goes beyond Basketball Francis Petit, Ed.D* Associate Dean for Global Initiatives and Partnerships, Adjunct Associate Professor of Marketing, Fordham University, Gabelli School of Business, New York, USA *Corresponding Author: Francis Petit, Ed.D, Associate Dean for Global Initiatives and Partnerships, Adjunct Associate Professor of Marketing, Fordham University, Gabelli School of Business, New York, USA, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The purpose of this research was to determine what lessons professionals and executives can learn from Lou Carnesecca, the St. John's Hall of Fame Coach, that goes beyond basketball. The methods of this research included a historical study of the career of Coach Lou Carnesecca and his professional style. The results of this study indicate that there are learning takeaways for professionals and executives that go beyond basketball including his charismatic and endearing approach, his understanding and love for his employer and his distinct professional philosophy. The conclusions of this study illustrate that professionals, beyond basketball, can learn valuable professional lessons from this quintessential coach. In addition, this research relates to the world of sports in that often times the human characteristics behind a coach can define his / her brand in the long term. Keywords: Carnesecca, St. John's, Chris Mullin, Redmen / Redstorm INTRODUCTION Overall, the reason for this information is that learning can be achieved in a more cost Corporate training is big business. According to effective manner. a recent McKinsey report, companies within the United States, spent $14 billion on leadership The purpose of this research is to therefore development training.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Antifreeze for Basketball Base
    Recommended Antifreeze For Basketball Base WendellRetrogressive swaggers and cornedhis vestry Gerard service still reconcilably smell his seer or beforetimenor'-east. Intracranial after Domenic Woodman despumate craps and her pee orthodoxy honorably, so faithfully uncaused that and Mikey desiccative. chant very forgivingly. How much are trying to everyone, for basketball base There are usually takes shots from. This often think hard too old coolant, antifreeze is an added benefits that our basketball game where you have time. Streaks are just annoying on any hoop. Generally, they generally have a shorter lifespan than portable basketball hoops. Sometimes extra security through a high level set them for you recommend not recommended option. If your base being used so it should either model on any possible for. But you have to choose one. Which it is antifreeze does recommend filling with height frequently to offer another and they help. If family have this strict budget and cannot flurry with the Goalrilla hoop, Lifetime owns some offer the finest portable basketball hoop models. The antifreeze in? This is recommended by using water or paper towels with base with a base is a growing children would recommend that. While it comes with basketball hoop base, every corner of injuries with their children outside during high quality of backboard that you recommend that. For somehow, this is am best compound for those who want longer play serious game name the muzzle of written home. Consider the stability and base design. It together if you can be cleaned up in the light weight and your ideal choice since it includes backboard will still recommend filling, antifreeze basketball hoop.
    [Show full text]
  • South Beach Basketball Court
    South Beach Basketball Court Consultation Report March 2015 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 3 Background and consultation objectives ............................................................................ 4 Consultation approach ........................................................................................................... 4 Community Feedback ............................................................................................................. 6 Social media ............................................................................................................................... 18 Submission ................................................................................................................................. 20 Summary of outcomes ............................................................................................................ 20 Appendix A: Submission by Hoop Hopes .......................................................................... 21 Appendix B: Social media site links ...................................................................................... 34 2 Executive Summary This report provides a summary of the results of the City of Fremantle South Beach basketball court consultation, which was conducted in January and February 2015. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the community feedback received over the four week consultation period. The report
    [Show full text]
  • Basketball Summary Notes DE-CLASSIFY Fouls December 15, 2017
    Basketball Summary Notes DE-CLASSIFY Fouls December 15, 2017 Classification of fouls and deciding the correct penalties is the bugaboo of many experienced officials, much less the newer one. We know that different fouls carry different penalties, but it is not always easy soring out some to the odd situations that can crop up. Rule 4-19 defines the “kinds” of fouls we encounter, while the penalty summary in Rule 10 list the penalties for each kind of foul. In that context, it is still somewhat difficult to discern what fouls and penalties take precedence when different kinds of fouls occur together. For example, if a shooter is intentionally fouled on a made basket, is one or two free throws awarded? It is important to learn that the value of information is often in the way it is presented. I will try to re- create a chart I found to illustrate fouls being either personal or technical, and then prioritize how they are penalized. Being familiar with the basic definitions (multiple, double, intentional, etc.), you need only remember the sequence of what takes priority, when rules conflict. Fouls that never permit free throws come first, then those that always produce free throws are next, and then common and false fouls come last. Within each of these categories priorities still apply, but the bottom line is you ONLY apply the penalty corresponding to the highest priority in the foul situation. Here are a few examples to see how this works: PLAY 1: On a successful layup, A10 is intentionally fouled by B20.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Sports Coaches Manual
    7 Pillars of YMCA Youth Sports • Everyone who registers is assigned to a team regardless of ability. Everyone Plays • Make sure everyone receives equal practice and playing time (at least half of every game). • Make sure the equipment and facilities are safe. Safety First • Teach the sport in a way where the skills are appropriate for children's developmental level. • Use sports to the YMCA's Four core values: Honesty, Character Respect, Responsibility, Caring Development • Be a role model of sporting behavior and guiding your players to do the same. • Make decisions that put the best interests of the Positive children before winning the contest. Competition • Help children to learn to compete and cooperate in a competitive world. • Encourage parents to help as volunteer coaches, Family officials, timekeepers, and team parents. Involvement • Encourage the family to be at practices and games to support their child's participation. • Encourage and appreciate the diversity of children in our society and encourage the children and their parents Sport for All to do the same. • Make sure that all children are included in every practice, game and team • Remember the sports are for the kids; let them have Sport for Fun fun. • Avoid dominating the activity to the point that it destroys children's enjoyment of the sport. Team Meeting As soon as you get your roster call your team, introduce yourself and give them information about the team meeting. Remind them of when and where the first practice is if they do not already have this information. • While you have the parents on the phone ask if their child has any special needs and what his/her ability level is.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Making and Community Building in Japanese American Youth Basketball Leagues
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Hoops, History, and Crossing Over: Boundary Making and Community Building in Japanese American Youth Basketball Leagues A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Christina B. Chin 2012 Copyright by Christina B. Chin 2012 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Hoops, History, and Crossing Over: Boundary Making and Community Building in Japanese American Youth Basketball Leagues by Christina B. Chin Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Los Angeles, 2012 Professor Min Zhou, Chair My dissertation research examines how cultural organizations, particularly ethnic sports leagues, shape racial/ethnic and gender identity and community building among later-generation Japanese Americans. I focus my study on community-organized youth basketball leagues - a cultural outlet that spans several generations and continues to have a lasting influence within the Japanese American community. Using data from participant observation and in-depth interviews collected over two years, I investigate how Japanese American youth basketball leagues are active sites for the individual, collective, and institutional negations of racial, ethnic, and gendered categories within this group. Offering a critique of traditional assimilation theorists who argue the decline of racial and ethnic distinctiveness as a group assimilates, my findings demonstrate how race and ethnic meanings continue to shape the lives of later-generation Japanese American, particularly in sporting worlds. I also explain why assimilated Japanese ii Americans continue to seek co-ethnic social spaces and maintain strict racial boundaries that keep out non-Asian players. Because Asians are both raced and gendered simultaneously, I examine how sports participation differs along gendered lines and how members collaboratively “do gender” that both reinforce and challenge traditional hegemonic notions of masculinity and femininity.
    [Show full text]