Great Fortune: the Lipic of Building (New York, 1930)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Fortune: the Lipic of Building (New York, 1930) 34 f e l l | 2 o c 4 IC i t t (.2 Planning and Chance and applied the lessons to later projects Okrent keeps us turning the pages for and ihey commissioned him to create such as the American Radiator Building news of every one of them. murals in the center's lobby. Rivera, {New York, 1924) and the Daily News The matter ol the second half of the as every other schoolboy knew, was a Great Fortune: The lipic of Building (New York, 1930). Okrent has book, however, is not quite as compelling. Socialist and saw this project as an oppor- Rockefeller Center the highest praise for these two works Stories ol filling the building and turn- tunity to place a critique in this temple ol by Daniel Okrent. Published by Viking, (but no pictures ol them, and not enough ing it on are not as interesting as tales of capitalism. The Rockefellers sold tickets 2003. 544 pp., $29.95 pictures of anything he writes about) and the project's growth out of a "six-year to the public to watch Rivera paint! But makes them his primary evidence that charrette." Hood's realization that this when he wouldn't remove Lenin's face Reviewed by Jerrence Doody I lood ».K urn In temperament a maestro skyscraper was not going to have a single from the allegory, they paid him off and but a thorough pragmatist. He believed street-side facade and his understand- tore down the wall. The question remains: When the financier Otto Kahn wanted that "Utility produces beauty" and would ing of how to use setback laws to shape Who was more naive in all of this than an elegant new house for his great love, have been perfectly comfortable with the volume seem of more lasting value than whom? Did the Rockefellers think their the Metropolitan Opera, lie gathered a formulation "Form follows finance." He solving the problem of the Sixth Avenue money could bin everything? Did Rivera group ol investors that included John I). was a great architect who had almost hi, And the star characters of the book's think that art will always triumph? It is Rockefeller II, and their eyes fell on a no ego and absolutely no theories. And second phase are of a lesser magnitude. fun for the rest of us to contemplate how piece ol midtown Manhattan owned by although Philip Johnson included Hood's Donald Deskey's elegant, influential Art great a space such naivete occupies in Columbia University. Columbia president McGraw Hill Building (New York, 1930) Deco interiors are beautiful, but not as egos of this magnitude. Nicholas Murray Hurler was eager to sell in the Museum ol Modem Art show that historically important as the center's set- Okrent has two final statements the property in order to finance a new defined the International Style, Hood was ting and function. And while Samuel about the meaning ol Rockefeller Center. campus in Morningside I leights. Butler as unimpressed and unconcerned as he Lionel Rothaplel, like the Swiss hotelier The first has to do with its relation ro got Columbia's new house, Kahn didn't was by Lewis Mumford's performance. Cesar Ritz, became a brand name him Junior. "If Junior ever saw |it| as his get the Met's, and Rockefeller wound up Okrent calls Mumford a Savonarola self—he was called Roxy, and Okrent own triumph," Okrent writes, "he never with the center that would bear his fam- because he hated Rockefeller Center as calls him the Johnny Appleseed of movie said so. His natural diffidence would not ily's famous name. The account of how it was going up (as almost everyone else theaters—the catastrophe that defined have allowed him to brag. I lis self-image planning and chance work (and don't did) then recanted and decided he liked it the grand opening ot his Radio City would have made linn reluctant to exalt work) together is the big story Daniel (again, as almost everyone else did), but Music Hall is this epic's moment of farce. the success of an endeavor that may have Okrent tells in Great Fortune: The Epic of without explaining or apparently remem- But there's another angle here. If i lood begun with a socially beneficent objective Rockefeller Center. Okrent's book offers bering his earlier views. In one of the and Todd were perfect partners, Roxy |a new Opera house| but, through two many other stories, including the history hook's best asides, Okrent reports how and Junior in.u have been dark twins. decades ol great fortune, had concluded of the center's architecture, the mysteries much be Corbusier, who hated New York Though he was a teetotaler, Junior wasn't in a thoroughly commercial success." of real estate, the power of money, and City, loved Rockefeller Center—so much entirely abstemious: His summer place After its completion, Junior said, "1 really the even greater power of personality, all that he endowed it with "that most pre- in Si-.d I larbor, Maine, had 107 rooms, belong in Williamsburg." of which surface in his accounts of the cious gilt tor ambitious architects: 44 fireplaces, and 22 bathrooms, and In his second and more important characters who people this epic narrative. a theory." Okrent hints that Riverside Church, one conclusion, Okrent writes, "Why had Some of these are truly great characters; Although Hood was the lead designer, o) Junior's great philanthropic ventures, is none of the scores of office or cultural Okrent is a powerful storyteller, and this many other prominent architects worked a Koxy-likc cathedral. complexes all over the country, every one is a terrific book. on the huge project team, and often later Junior's philanthropy is important ol iheiu uispnvd b\ Km kelt-ller ( riili-r, John D. Rockefeller II is the most rook full credit. Okrent, however, gives to his personal story; it is his conscious even approached the original's aesthetic, important figure in the hook, and cer- a large share of responsibility for the reparation for his father's ruthlessness. He commercial and—there's no other word tainly the most interesting. H.L. Mencken center's success to the developer John R. funded, in addition to Riverside Church, for it—emotional success?...a point vivid- called him John the Baptist—he was a Todd, the project's CKO and enabling the rebuilding of the cathedral at Rheims, ly illustrated barely a mile uptown, amid teetotaler ami Sunday school teacher—but visionary. Todd was as brilliant as blood Colonial Williamsburg, the Cloisters, the desolate daytime expanses of Lincoln everyone else called him Junior (which is and a much more imperious personage. and (through his wife, Abby) M o M A . Center," the home that Otto Kahn almost all wc need to know to guess what When Junior asked how much of his rime Building Rockefeller Center also created originally wanted for his beloved Met. he was like). The burden of his father's he was willing to devote to the project, a huge number of Depression jobs, and "Rockefeller Center's placement, right in imperial success made Junior timid, ill at Todd said, "All of my time. One-half on Junior was as sympathetic to labor as a the heart of.,.the city's grid, made it real ease, eager to lose himself in the million the job and one-half as far away as trains Rockefeller could be. I lowever, the need in a way that, say, a development never details, and brilliant at delegating respon- and steamers can carry me, to places to fill the center led to practices that could be." It is more than another build sibility to powerful men who knew their where 1 can get the hair out of my eyes Okrent says come right from the Standard ing or destination; it is, Okrent writes, places in the Rockefeller cosmology. and a clearer and better view of things." Oil playbook, such as buying other build- "organically, the city itself." Just as compelling a character, though Todd's authority was responsible for ings, evicting their tenants, and forcing Great Fortune wasn't built in a perhaps simpler, is the architect Raymond every aspect of the building's realization, them to rent in Rockefeller Center. day, but it suggests on every page that Hood. Working for the son of the novel- from the start through to its comple- Greet Fortune is in part a family Okrent, despite the effort spent research- ist William Dean I lowells, 1 lood did the tion and then to the way in which clients biography. Second son Nelson Rockefeller ing and shaping his story, enjoyed himself winning design for the Tribune Tower were strong-armed into tenancy. The receives a lot of attention as the story immensely, and his pleasure is now ours. in Chicago in 1922. John M. Howells project was massive in every respect; the moves on; after all, he is the one respon- Moreover, as we watch the World Trade took most of the prize money, but he did Depression made it more significant; and sible for realizing the center as the family's Outer being rebuilt, with all the conflict- give Hood his share of the credit. 1 lood the early failure of its rival, the Lmpire flagship. But Okrent's best story about ing demands as to what it is to be and do, did even better: He knew Lliet Saarinen's State Building, made its success a fable him is not exactly to his credit.
Recommended publications
  • Zoning ORDINANCE USER's MANUAL
    CITY OF PROVIDENCEPROVIDENCE ZONING ORDINANCE USER'S MANUAL PRODUCED BY CAMIROS ZONING ORDINANCE USER'S MANUAL WHAT IS ZONING? The Zoning Ordinance provides a set of land use and development regulations, organized by zoning district. The Zoning Map identifies the location of the zoning districts, thereby specifying the land use and develop- ment requirements affecting each parcel of land within the City. HOW TO USE THIS MANUAL This User’s Manual is intended to provide a brief overview of the organization of the Providence Zoning Ordinance, the general purpose of the various Articles of the ordinance, and summaries of some of the key ordinance sections -- including zoning districts, uses, parking standards, site development standards, and administration. This manual is for informational purposes only. It should be used as a reference only, and not to determine official zoning regulations or for legal purposes. Please refer to the full Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map for further information. user'’S MANUAL CONTENTS 1 ORDINANCE ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 ZONING DISTRICTS ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 3 USES.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New York CITY
    New York CITY the 123rd Annual Meeting American Historical Association NONPROFIT ORG. 400 A Street, S.E. U.S. Postage Washington, D.C. 20003-3889 PAID WALDORF, MD PERMIT No. 56 ASHGATENew History Titles from Ashgate Publishing… The Chronicle of Ibn al-Athir The Long Morning of Medieval Europe for the Crusading Period New Directions in Early Medieval Studies Edited by Jennifer R. Davis, California Institute from al-Kamil fi’l-Ta’rikh. Part 3 of Technology and Michael McCormick, The Years 589–629/1193–1231: The Ayyubids Harvard University after Saladin and the Mongol Menace Includes 25 b&w illustrations Translated by D.S. Richards, University of Oxford, UK June 2008. 366 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-6254-9 Crusade Texts in Translation: 17 June 2008. 344 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-4079-0 The Art, Science, and Technology of Medieval Travel The Portfolio of Villard de Honnecourt Edited by Robert Bork, University of Iowa (Paris, Bibliothèque nationale and Andrea Kann AVISTA Studies in the History de France, MS Fr 19093) of Medieval Technology, Science and Art: 6 A New Critical Edition and Color Facsimile Includes 23 b&w illustrations with a glossary by Stacey L. Hahn October 2008. 240 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-6307-2 Carl F. Barnes, Jr., Oakland University Includes 72 color and 48 b&w illustrations November 2008. 350 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-5102-4 The Medieval Account Books of the Mercers of London Patents, Pictures and Patronage An Edition and Translation John Day and the Tudor Book Trade Lisa Jefferson Elizabeth Evenden, Newnham College, November 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY PLANNING COMMISSION N 980314 ZRM Subway
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION July 20, 1998/Calendar No. 3 N 980314 ZRM IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by the Department of City Planning, pursuant to Section 201 of the New York City Charter, to amend various sections of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York relating to the establishment of a Special Lower Manhattan District (Article IX, Chapter 1), the elimination of the Special Greenwich Street Development District (Article VIII, Chapter 6), the elimination of the Special South Street Seaport District (Article VIII, Chapter 8), the elimination of the Special Manhattan Landing Development District (Article IX, Chapter 8), and other related sections concerning the reorganization and relocation of certain provisions relating to pedestrian circulation and subway stair relocation requirements and subway improvements. The application for the amendment of the Zoning Resolution was filed by the Department of City Planning on February 4, 1998. The proposed zoning text amendment and a related zoning map amendment would create the Special Lower Manhattan District (LMD), a new special zoning district in the area bounded by the West Street, Broadway, Murray Street, Chambers Street, Centre Street, the centerline of the Brooklyn Bridge, the East River and the Battery Park waterfront. In conjunction with the proposed action, the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development is proposing to amend the Brooklyn Bridge Southeast Urban Renewal Plan (located in the existing Special Manhattan Landing District) to reflect the proposed zoning text and map amendments. The proposed zoning text amendment controls would simplify and consolidate regulations into one comprehensive set of controls for Lower Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRYSLER BUILDING, 405 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 12. 1978~ Designation List 118 LP-0992 CHRYSLER BUILDING, 405 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1928- 1930; architect William Van Alen. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1297, Lot 23. On March 14, 1978, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a_public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Chrysler Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 12). The item was again heard on May 9, 1978 (Item No. 3) and July 11, 1978 (Item No. 1). All hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Thirteen witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were two speakers in opposition to designation. The Commission has received many letters and communications supporting designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Chrysler Building, a stunning statement in the Art Deco style by architect William Van Alen, embodies the romantic essence of the New York City skyscraper. Built in 1928-30 for Walter P. Chrysler of the Chrysler Corporation, it was "dedicated to world commerce and industry."! The tallest building in the world when completed in 1930, it stood proudly on the New York skyline as a personal symbol of Walter Chrysler and the strength of his corporation. History of Construction The Chrysler Building had its beginnings in an office building project for William H. Reynolds, a real-estate developer and promoter and former New York State senator. Reynolds had acquired a long-term lease in 1921 on a parcel of property at Lexington Avenue and 42nd Street owned by the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.
    [Show full text]
  • 400 Years in Manhattan Brings New York City History to the Stage
    August 22, 2019 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 400 Years in Manhattan Brings New York City History to the Stage Multimedia monologue to be seen in 2019 United Solo Theatre Festival 400yearsinmanhattan.com Publicity images are available for download at 400yearsinmanhattan.com NEW YORK — In 400 Years in Manhattan, “recovering tour guide” Noah Diamond tells the story of the island of Manhattan, accompanied by an expansive multimedia presentation. Diamond, best known for his performance as Groucho Marx in the Off Broadway revival of I’ll Say She Is, made his New York debut on a double-decker tour bus. “That was my day job for years,” he says, “and I always thought: What I’m really doing here is writing a show.” The result of that thought, 400 Years in Manhattan, alternates between tales of Diamond’s experiences as a New York City tour guide, and the epic saga of the city itself. An earlier version of the show was seen in a workshop production at HERE Arts Center in 2007. Amanda Sisk, director and producer of 400 Years in Manhattan as well as I’ll Say She Is, has been developing this material with Diamond since the work’s inception. As in their earlier collaboration on the Nero Fiddled political musicals, the team finds narrative arcs in episodic storytelling—a special feat in the case of 400 Years in Manhattan, a one-person play which encompasses four centuries of history. Diamond is the author of Love Marches On: A Saga of Broadway and Gimme a Thrill: The Story of I’ll Say She Is.
    [Show full text]
  • EDUCATION MATERIALS TEACHER GUIDE Dear Teachers
    TM EDUCATION MATERIALS TEACHER GUIDE Dear Teachers, Top of the RockTM at Rockefeller Center is an exciting destination for New York City students. Located on the 67th, 69th, and 70th floors of 30 Rockefeller Plaza, the Top of the Rock Observation Deck reopened to the public in November 2005 after being closed for nearly 20 years. It provides a unique educational opportunity in the heart of New York City. To support the vital work of teachers and to encourage inquiry and exploration among students, Tishman Speyer is proud to present Top of the Rock Education Materials. In the Teacher Guide, you will find discussion questions, a suggested reading list, and detailed plans to help you make the most of your visit. The Student Activities section includes trip sheets and student sheets with activities that will enhance your students’ learning experiences at the Observation Deck. These materials are correlated to local, state, and national curriculum standards in Grades 3 through 8, but can be adapted to suit the needs of younger and older students with various aptitudes. We hope that you find these education materials to be useful resources as you explore one of the most dazzling places in all of New York City. Enjoy the trip! Sincerely, General Manager Top of the Rock Observation Deck 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York NY 101 12 T: 212 698-2000 877 NYC-ROCK ( 877 692-7625) F: 212 332-6550 www.topoftherocknyc.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Teacher Guide Before Your Visit . Page 1 During Your Visit . Page 2 After Your Visit . Page 6 Suggested Reading List .
    [Show full text]
  • The Skyscraper of the 1920S
    BECOMING MODERN: AMERICA IN THE 1920S PRIMARY SOURCE COLLECTION ONTEMPORAR Y IN OMMENTARY HE WENTIES T T C * THE SKYSCRAPER In the American self-image of the 1920s, the icon of modern was the modern city, the icon of the modern city was New York City, and the icon of New York City was the skyscraper. Love it or hate it, the skyscraper symbolized the go-go and up-up drive that “America” meant to itself and much of the world. A sampling of twenties illustration and commentary on the architectural phenomenon that still captures the American imagination is presented here. Berenice Abbott, Cliff and Ferry Street, Manhattan, photograph, 1935 Louis Lozowick, 57th St. [New York City], lithograph, 1929 Museum of the City of New York Renwick Gallery/Smithsonian Institution * ® National Humanities Center, AMERICA IN CLASS , 2012: americainclass.org/. Punctuation and spelling modernized for clarity. Complete image credits at americainclass.org/sources/becomingmodern/imagecredits.htm. R. L. Duffus Robert L. Duffus was a novelist, literary critic, and essayist with New York newspapers. “The Vertical City” The New Republic One of the intangible satisfactions which a New Yorker receives as a reward July 3, 1929 for living in a most uncomfortable city arises from the monumental character of his artificial scenery. Skyscrapers are undoubtedly popular with the man of the street. He watches them with tender, if somewhat fearsome, interest from the moment the hole is dug until the last Gothic waterspout is put in place. Perhaps the nearest a New Yorker ever comes to civic pride is when he contemplates the skyline and realizes that there is and has been nothing to match it in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 (3-82) OMB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department off the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections____________ 1. Name historic Rockefeller Center and or common 2. Location Bounded by Fifth Avenue, West 48th Street, Avenue of the street & number Americas, and West 51st Street____________________ __ not for publication city, town New York ___ vicinity of state New York code county New York code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public x occupied agriculture museum x building(s) x private unoccupied x commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible _ x entertainment religious object in process x yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name RCP Associates, Rockefeller Group Incorporated street & number 1230 Avenue of the Americas city, town New York __ vicinity of state New York 10020 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Surrogates' Court, New York Hall of Records street & number 31 Chambers Street city, town New York state New York 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Music Hall only: National Register title of Historic Places has this property been determined eligible? yes no date 1978 federal state county local depository for survey records National Park Service, 1100 L Street, NW ^^ city, town Washington_________________ __________ _ _ state____DC 7. Description Condition Check one Check one x excellent deteriorated unaltered x original s ite good ruins x altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The Rockefeller Center complex was the final result of an ill-fated plan to build a new Metropolitan Opera House in mid-town Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Height, Setbacks, and Floor Area 17.48
    HEIGHT, SETBACKS, AND FLOOR AREA 17.48 Chapter 17.48 – HEIGHT, SETBACKS, AND FLOOR AREA Sections: 17.48.010 Purpose 17.48.020 Height Measurement and Exceptions 17.48.030 Setback Measurement and Exceptions 17.48.040 Floor Area and Floor Area Ratio 17.48.010 Purpose This chapter establishes rules for the measurement of height, setbacks, and floor area, and permitted exceptions to height and setback requirements. 17.48.020 Height Measurement and Exceptions A. Measurement of Height. 1. The height of a building is measured as the vertical distance from the assumed ground surface to the highest point of the building. 2. Assumed ground surface means a line on the exterior wall of a building that connects the points where the perimeter of the wall meets the finished grade. See Figure 17.48-1. 3. If grading or fill on a property within five years of an application increases the height of the assumed ground service, height shall be measured using an estimation of the assumed ground surface as it existed prior to the grading or fill. FIGURE 17.48-1: MEASUREMENT OF MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING HEIGHT 48-1 17.48 HEIGHT, SETBACKS, AND FLOOR AREA B. Height Exceptions. Buildings may exceed the maximum permitted height in the applicable zoning district as shown in Table 17.48-1. Note: Height exceptions in Table 17.48-1 below add detail to height exceptions in Section 17.81.070 of the existing Zoning Code. TABLE 17.48-1: ALLOWED PROJECTIONS ABOVE HEIGHT LIMITS Maximum Projection Above Structures Allowed Above Height Limit Maximum Coverage Height Limit Non-habitable decorative features including 3 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning Handbook 1961
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION • DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING ZONING HANDBOOK A Guide to the Zoning Resolution of The City of New York TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................................ >................. _ ••••• __••••••• __ ............................ 4 THE STRUCTURE OF THE RESOLUTION Zoning Maps ............................................................ _........................ _............................. 6 Text of the Resolution ................................................................................................ 7 Index of Uses ........................................................ ........................................................ 8 USE Use Groups and Special Permit Uses ....................................... __ .......................... 10 Use Districts .......................................................... _.......................... __ •......................... 12 Industrial Performance Standards (Manufacturing Districts) .............................................. _ .............................. 13 Supplementary Use Regulations and Special Provisions Along District Boundaries ............................................ 14 Signs ................................................................................................... _.............................. 14 BULK Controls Over Intensity of Development .............................................................. 16 Design Controls ........... ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysler Building: Race to the Sky
    PDHonline Course S255 (4 PDH) Chrysler Building: Race to the Sky Instructor: Jeffrey Syken 2012 PDH Online | PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax: 703-988-0088 www.PDHonline.org www.PDHcenter.com An Approved Continuing Education Provider Race to the Sky 1 Table of Contents Slide/s Part Title/Description 1 N/A Title 2 N/A Table of Contents 3~22 1 THE 1925 PARIS EXPOSITION 23~53 2 ART DECO 54~111 3 EVER HIGHER 112~157 4 RACE FOR THE SKY 158~177 5 OLD BULLET HEAD 178~234 6 THE DESIGN 235~252 7 THE LOBBY 253~262 8 THE CLOUD CLUB 263~273 9 CONSTRUCTION 274~300 10 LEGACY 2 Part 1 THE 1925 PARIS EXPOSITION 3 Away with the architraves, pillars and antiquated temples of the aristocratic past. The universal human community will produce its own style, appropriate for its own age here in the twentieth century! 4 5 6 “French taste was law… Why? Because all around us the English, Germans, Belgians, Italians, Scandinavians and even the Americans themselves reacted and sought to create for themselves – for better or worse – an original art, a novel style corresponding to the changing needs manifested by an international clientele…” Lucien Dior – French Minister of Commerce 7 8 9 10 “All that clearly distinguished the older ways of life was rigorously excluded from the exposition of 1925” Waldemar George 11 12 13 “A cabinet maker is an architect…In designing a piece of furniture, it is essential to study conscientiously the balance of volume, the silhouette and the proportion in accordance with the chosen material and the technique imposed by this material” RE: Excerpt from: Arts Decoratifs: A Personal Recollection of the Paris Exhibition 14 15 “In 1900, we saw the triumph of noodling ornamentation.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHITECTURE AS the PRODUCTION of INTERIORITY a Comprehensive Tool to Understand Interiority in Architecture for an Evolving World
    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN UNDERGRADUATE HONORS THESIS UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER ARCHITECTURE AS THE PRODUCTION OF INTERIORITY A Comprehensive Tool to Understand Interiority in Architecture for an Evolving World DEVIN COSTELLO Examining Committee: Jade Polizzi – Environmental Design – Primary Advisor Robert Nauman – Art and Art History – Secondary Advisor Maryanne Fantalis – Environmental Design – Honors Committee Representative Defense: March 31, 2020 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank everyone that had a role in the completion of this thesis. To my committee members, without your unwavering support and guidance through this, I would not have made the progress I did. I appreciate the countless meetings, draft reviews, and hours spent problem solving and adjusting my work to achieve the level it has reached today. To my parents and family, your emotional support has helped to motivate me in trying times. Given the current social climate that we are all persevering through, I hope my work can provide a sliver of hope, or at least provide a distraction, for those who read it as we continue to face more challenges related and un-related to design. Let us not forget that design is at the root of every problem and also every solution. 2 ABSTRACT World population is exponentially increasing, causing a depletion of natural resources, global temperatures to rise, and buildable land to diminish. Research has shown that as a reaction to these issues, designers are using old and unused buildings as the blank canvas for new projects. The objective of this thesis is to determine new ways of understanding existing buildings in case they undergo alterations and re-purposing.
    [Show full text]