Biodiversity Express Survey Sheka Biosphere Reserve September 2016 Biodiversity Express Survey 5 Biodiversity Express Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity Express Survey Sheka Biosphere Reserve September 2016 Biodiversity Express Survey 5 Biodiversity Express Survey Biodiversity Express Survey Sheka biosphere reserve September 2016 Biodiversity Express Survey Express Biodiversity 5 Biodiversity Inventory for Conservation Biodiversity Inventory for Conservation 2 Biodiversity Express Survey (BES) 5, Sheka forest biosphere reserve, Ethiopia, 2016 15 September 2016 Biodiversity Inventory for Conservation (BINCO) http://www.binco.eu [email protected] Editor: Matthias De Beenhouwer Contributing authors: Bernard Oosterlynck, Jesse Erens, Mattias Van Opstal, Jan Mertens and Million Belay Lay out: Jan Mertens Publication date: v5.0 September 2016 Picture covers: 1. Riverine forest at the Baro river - photo courtesy of Siel Wellens 2. Afrixalus 1 enseticola - photo courtesy of Jesse Erens 3. Bycanistes brevis - photo courtesy of Siel Wellens 4. Bushbuck (Tragelaphus scriptus) - photo courtesy of Matthias De Beenhouwer 5. Danaus chrysippus - photo courtesy of Matthias De Beenhouwer 2 3 4 5 Biodiversity Express Surveys (BES) are snapshot biodiversity studies of carefully selected regions. Expeditions typically target understudied and/or threatened areas with an urgent need for more information on the occurring fauna and flora. The results are presented in an Express Report (ER) that is made publicly available online for anybody to use and can be found at www.BINCO.eu. Teams consist of a small number of international specialists and local scientists. Results presented in Express Reports are dynamic and will be updated as new information on identifications from the survey and from observations in the area become available. Suggested citation: De Beenhouwer M., Oosterlynck B., Van Opstal M., Shaweno A., Belay M., Erens J. (2016) Express Biodiversity Survey in Sheka Forest Biosphere reserve, Ethiopia. Biodiversity Express Survey 5. Biodi- versity Inventory for Conservation. Glabbeek, Belgium, 30 pp. BES5 Sheka forest - September 2016 3 Index Expedition fact sheet 4 Quick overview of results 6 Abstract 6 1. Introduction 7 2. Goal 9 3. Biodiversity survey 9 Herpetofauna 10 Mammals 12 Birds 14 Butterflies 22 Orchids 23 4. Results 24 5. Discussion 26 6. References 28 Appendix I 30 Biodiversity Inventory for Conservation 4 EXPEDITION FACT SHEET Location Sheka Zone, SNPPR, Southwest Ethiopia. Date February – June 2016 Expedition Members – Expertise Matthias De Beenhouwer – Birds and Mammals Bernard Oosterlynck – Birds Jesse Erens – Amphibians and Reptiles Mattias Van Opstal – Birds and Mammals Trainees Wosen Adinew; Mebratu Chegito; Berhanu Ayasho; Belihatu Kidane; Getnet Kassahun Cooperation This expedition was made possible with help of: • MELCA-Ethiopia, Sheka Branch Office • Anderacha, Masha, and Yeki woreda offices • Birdlife, Eastern Afromontane Branch Office • Local guides (Befekadu and Yimbelo) • EWNHS, Ethiopian Wildlife and Natural • Jimma University History Society • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven • EWCA, Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority BES5 Sheka forest - September 2016 5 Acknowledgements We greatly acknowledge the CEPF (Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund) and the KNBV (Royal Bo- tanical Society of The Netherlands) for financially supporting this project. Additionally, we want to thank IDEA Wild and BINCO for material support. BirdLife International, IUCN and EWNHS are acknowledged for logistic support. The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the European Union, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. A fundamental goal is to ensure that civil so- ciety is engaged in biodiversity conservation. Finally, we want to acknowledge MELCA-Ethiopia. This Ethiopian NGO, founded by Dr. Million Belay, has worked hard to mobilize the local people, government and other actors for the protection of Sheka as well as promote the importance of this forest, both nationally and internationally, and with success, as the Sheka forest and its surroundings are now known as the Sheka Forest Biosphere Reserve in UNESCO’s Man and Biosphere program (MAB). MELCA-Ethiopia, and especially Adugna Shaweno and Wosen Adinew, did not only greatly facilitate our research in terms of logistics and pa- perwork, but also showed us that community based forest conservation is the way forward. Lastly, we can’t thank MELCA enough for their invaluable support and their hospitality and friendship during our stay. Biodiversity Inventory for Conservation 6 QuICk OvErvIEw OF rESulTS Table 1. An overview of the taxa identified at this point and the survey and collecting techniques used: Op- portunistic observations (OO), Active survey (AS), Camera trapping (CT). Taxa # Species Survey Technique Mammals 25 CT and OO Amphibians 21 AS and OO Reptiles 8 OO Birds 246 AS and OO Butterflies 49 OO Orchids 19 OO Abstract As Ethiopia’s forests are rapidly disappearing, a better protection of the remaining forest ecosystems becomes paramount for conserving extant Ethiopian biodiversity, including its associated genetic re- sources. The Sheka Forest Biosphere Reserve in Southwest Ethiopia lies within the Eastern Afromonta- ne Biodiversity Hotspot and comprises one of the larger continuous stretches of forest left in the coun- try. Nonetheless, little is known about the forest biodiversity, although this is a crucial first step for an efficient forest conservation and management, and to start up a long-term monitoring program. To fill this gap, we surveyed a selected number of taxa (amphibians, mammals and birds) and complemented this with opportunistic observations of reptile, butterfly and orchid species to better understand the complexity and gradients of biodiversity across different habitats (including riverine forest, broadleaf forest, bamboo forest and plantation forest) within the reserve. Provisionally, we identified 25 mammal species, 21 amphibians, 8 reptiles, 246 birds, 49 butterfly species, and 19 species of epiphytic orchid. Species identification is ongoing and this survey report will be updated as more information becomes available. This expedition revealed many species new for this area, showing a considerable range and/or altitudinal extension. Also, many endemic and/or globally threatened species (following the IUCN red list) were found. These were often found in the proposed core zones within the reserve, emphasizing not only the biogeographical importance of this reserve within the biodiversity hotspot, but also the functi- onality of the designated core zone. However, as human encroachment into these core zones increases, it is time to halt land allocation to private investors, and to acknowledge the value of the long-establis- hed kobo community forestry for biodiversity conservation and sustainable forest management. This expedition mostly illustrates the scant knowledge of biodiversity in these forest ecosystems. In light of the current threat, our findings highlight an acute need for a better insight in the occurring fauna and flora. We also recommend the startup of a long-term monitoring protocol to enable the detection of changes related to human encroachment, habitat conversion and climate change. BES5 Sheka forest - September 2016 7 1 Introduction Ethiopian natural forests are rapidly disappearing and today the remaining primary forest located mostly in the country’s most inaccessible areas. The national deforestation rate is estimated at 140,900 ha annually, and forest intensification converts the remaining natural forest patches to coffee forests or open woodland. According to the U.N., 11.2% or about 12,296,000 ha of Ethiopia is forested, though the percentage of natural forest is unclear (FAO, 2010). Threats to the Ethiopian forests are numerous as a result of a rising population pressure, with widespread deforestation for new settlement and agri- cultural lands, as well as adverse urban development policies and uncontrolled private investment. The strong increase of coffee and tea plantations, for example, and the current deterioration of the culture of forest protection are two examples relevant to the Sheka zone. In addition, forest depletion for short term needs, such as timber, firewood collection and bush meat are omnipresent in the remaining for- ests with unknown effects on Ethiopia’s flora and fauna. Forests in southwestern Ethiopia occur along a wide ecological gradient and include diverse types. In the highlands, there is predominantly Afromontane rainforest (Friis, 1992) which grows at altitudes from 1500 to 2400 m, whereas in the lowlands transitional rainforests (500–1500 m) are predominant, together with the dry Guineo-Congolian forests (450–600 m). A large number of endemic plants occur in the Afromontane forests including wild populations of plants with substantial agricultural value such as Coffea arabica, Aframomum corrorima, and Piper capense. C. arabica is the most popular cof- fee consumed in the world, while A. corrorima and P. capense are important sources of spices and thus local income (Woldemarian & Fetene, 2007). The Sheka administrative zone is situated within the SNNPR (Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples) province, bordering both the Gambela province in the West and the Oromia province in the North and East. It consists of three districts (Yeki, Anderacha and Masha woreda), each divided in a differing number of municipalities or kebele’s (the smallest administrative division). The Sheka zone is one of the few zones in Ethiopia where traditional beliefs and ecological knowledge have aided the conservation of forests up to now.
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Species List (Note, There Was a Pre-Tour to Kenya in 2018 As in 2017, but These Species Were Not Recorded
    Tanzania Species List (Note, there was a pre-tour to Kenya in 2018 as in 2017, but these species were not recorded. You can find a Kenya list with the fully annotated 2017 Species List for reference) February 6-18, 2018 Guides: Preston Mutinda and Peg Abbott, Driver/guides William Laiser and John Shoo, and 6 participants: Rob & Anita, Susan and Jan, and Bob and Joan KEYS FOR THIS LIST The # in (#) is the number of days the species was seen on the tour (E) – endemic BIRDS STRUTHIONIDAE: OSTRICHES OSTRICH Struthio camelus massaicus – (8) ANATIDAE: DUCKS & GEESE WHITE-FACED WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna viduata – (2) FULVOUS WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna bicolor – (1) COMB DUCK Sarkidiornis melanotos – (1) EGYPTIAN GOOSE Alopochen aegyptiaca – (12) SPUR-WINGED GOOSE Plectropterus gambensis – (2) RED-BILLED DUCK Anas erythrorhyncha – (4) HOTTENTOT TEAL Anas hottentota – (2) CAPE TEAL Anas capensis – (2) NUMIDIDAE: GUINEAFOWL HELMETED GUINEAFOWL Numida meleagris – (12) PHASIANIDAE: PHEASANTS, GROUSE, AND ALLIES COQUI FRANCOLIN Francolinus coqui – (2) CRESTED FRANCOLIN Francolinus sephaena – (2) HILDEBRANDT'S FRANCOLIN Francolinus hildebrandti – (3) Naturalist Journeys [email protected] 866.900.1146 / Caligo Ventures [email protected] 800.426.7781 naturalistjourneys.com / caligo.com P.O. Box 16545 Portal AZ 85632 FAX: 650.471.7667 YELLOW-NECKED FRANCOLIN Francolinus leucoscepus – (4) [E] GRAY-BREASTED FRANCOLIN Francolinus rufopictus – (4) RED-NECKED FRANCOLIN Francolinus afer – (2) LITTLE GREBE Tachybaptus ruficollis – (1) PHOENICOPTERIDAE:FLAMINGOS
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition and Diversity of Insects of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve in Ghana
    Open Journal of Ecology, 2014, 4, 1061-1079 Published Online December 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/oje http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oje.2014.417087 Species Composition and Diversity of Insects of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve in Ghana Rosina Kyerematen1,2*, Erasmus Henaku Owusu1, Daniel Acquah-Lamptey1, Roger Sigismund Anderson2, Yaa Ntiamoa-Baidu1,3 1Department of Animal Biology and Conservation Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 2African Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 3Centre for African Wetlands, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana Email: *[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 6 September 2014; revised 9 November 2014; accepted 21 November 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve, the only one in Ghana, was established to promote scientific re- search, particularly on how nature revitalizes itself after major disasters, and also to check the southward drift of the savannah grassland. This study presents the first comprehensive inventory of species composition and diversity of insects of the Reserve. Insects were surveyed between September 2011 and June 2012 to capture the end of the rainy season, the dry season and the peak of the wet season. Samples were taken from two sites within the Reserve, Dagomba and Oku using various sampling techniques including pitfall traps, malaise traps and sweep nets. Insect com- munities were characterized in terms of, 1) species richness estimators, 2) species richness, 3) Shannon-Weiner Index of Diversity, 4) Pielou’s evenness and 5) Bray-Curtis similarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Deforestation on Biodiversity, Soil Carbon Stocks, Soil Quality, Runoff and Sediment Yield at Southwest Ethiopia’S Forest Frontier
    Impact of deforestation on biodiversity, soil carbon stocks, soil quality, runoff and sediment yield at southwest Ethiopia’s forest frontier Henok Kassa Tegegne Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen Geografie Faculteit Wetenschappen Henok Kassa Tegegne Impact of deforestation on biodiversity, soil carbon stocks, soil quality, runoff and sediment yield at southwest Ethiopia’s forest frontier Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen: Geografie 2016-2017 Copyright: Henok Kassa 2017 Published by: Department of Geography - Ghent University Krijgslaan 281 (S8), 9000 Gent (Belgium) (c) All rights reserved. ix x Promoter: Prof. Dr. Jan Nyssen, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Co-promoter: Prof. Dr. Jean Poesen, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Section of Geography and Tourism, KU Leuven, Belgium Members of the Jury: Prof. Dr. Nico Vandeweghe, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium (Chair) Dr. Denyse Snelder, Senior Advisor Natural Resources Management, VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands Prof. Dr. Stefaan Dondeyne, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Section of Soil and Water Management, KU Leuven, Belgium Prof. Dr. Ann Verdoodt, Department of Soil Management, Faculty of Biosciences Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium Dr. Amaury Frankl, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium (secretary) Dr. Miro Jacob, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Dean: Prof. Dr. Herwig Dejonghe Rector: Prof. Dr. Anne De Paepe xi xii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I thank the Almighty God for granting me the capability and patience to accomplish the study. Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my promoters Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Avifauna of Two Woodlands in Southeast Tanzania
    Scopus 25: 2336, December 2005 The avifauna of two woodlands in southeast Tanzania Anders P. Tøttrup, Flemming P. Jensen and Kim D. Christensen In Tanzania Brachystegia or miombo woodland occupies about two-thirds of the country including the central plateau to the north and the south eastern plateau (Lind & Morrison 1974). Along the coast more luxuriant woodlands are found in what White (1983) terms the Zanzibar-Inhambane regional mosaic floristic region. This highly complex vegetation comprises unique types of forest, thicket, woodland, bushland and grassland, interspersed with areas presently under cultivation and fallow (Hawthorne 1993). The coastal woodlands are usually deciduous or semi-deciduous but contain some evergreen species and often merge with coastal thickets, scrub forest and coastal forest (Hawthorne 1993, Vollesen 1994). The avifauna of miombo woodlands has been described for Zambia (e.g. Benson & Irwin 1966) and Zimbabwe (e.g. Vernon 1968, 1984, 1985), while little has been published on the birds of the coastal woodlands. An exception is Stjernstedt (1970) who reported on the birds in lush and dense Brachystegia microphylla vegetation in a sea of miombo in southeast Tanzania. Here we report our observations of birds in two woodlands in coastal southeast Tanzania, one of which harboured miombo trees. We present information on the number of species encountered during the fieldwork, and compare the avifauna of the two sites. We discuss possible causes for the differences observed and provide new information on habitat preferences for some of the species we recorded at these sites. Study sites Field work was carried out in two coastal woodlands in the Lindi Region, southeast Tanzania in September and October 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Sample Procurement Plan (Text in italic font is meant for instruction to staff and should be deleted in the final version of the PP) Public Disclosure Authorized (This is only a sample with the minimum content that is required to be included in the PAD. The detailed procurement plan is still mandatory for disclosure on the Bank’s website in accordance with the guidelines. The initial procurement plan will cover the first 18 months of the project and then updated annually or earlier as necessary). I. General 1. Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan: Updated Procurement Plan, M 2. Date of General Procurement Notice: Dec 24, 2006 Public Disclosure Authorized 3. Period covered by this procurement plan: The procurement period of project covered from year June 2010 to December 2012 II. Goods and Works and non-consulting services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: [Thresholds for applicable procurement methods (not limited to the list below) will be determined by the Procurement Specialist /Procurement Accredited Staff based on the assessment of the implementing agency’s capacity.] Public Disclosure Authorized Procurement Method Prior Review Comments Threshold US$ 1. ICB and LIB (Goods) Above US$ 500,000 All 2. NCB (Goods) Above US$ 100,000 First contract 3. ICB (Works) Above US$ 15 million All 4. NCB (Works) Above US$ 5 million All 5. (Non-Consultant Services) Below US$ 100,000 First contract [Add other methods if necessary] 2. Prequalification. Bidders for _Not applicable_ shall be prequalified in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 2.9 and 2.10 of the Public Disclosure Authorized Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya - 14-21 October 2011
    KENYA - 14-21 OCTOBER 2011 TSAVO REGION AND COASTAL KENYA by Bob Biggs Background I decided to take the opportunity to visit Kenya again when I saw the price of the Thomson flight from Manchester to Mombasa had reduced to £500. If I’d have waited a few more weeks, I could have got it for less than £300. I suppose the actions of the Somali pirates caused that. I can understand why people are nervous in such circumstances but the Somali border is a very long way from the areas frequented by most British tourists. Anyway, £500 is pretty good for a direct flight so off I went on the evening of 13 October, having driven from Northumberland earlier in the afternoon. 14 OCTOBER Arrived a few minutes late [missing Libyan airspace] and got a flyer. I was outside within 25 minutes and met by my friend Jonathan Baya [see www.tracktours.weebly.com for all the details]. Unfortunately, it had been raining very hard in the previous few days and roads were difficult. Heavy lorries have a tendency to tip over in such conditions and we got caught up in two long traffic jams, which cost us the best part of two hours. Eventually, we got going and we made our way towards Voi, and Sagala Lodge, where we were staying for the first night. We didn’t see much en route, Tawny Eagle and Pale Chanting Goshawk being the pick of a small bunch. We arrived at Sagala at 1pm and quickly got into our stride. There were several Pink Breasted Larks in the bushy areas alongside the road and a few Golden Breasted Starlings and White Browed Sparrow Weavers.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: Organization for Social Development Enhancing Public-Private partnership for the conservation of Sheka Project Title: biosphere Reserve Date of Report: March 30, 2017 Report Author and Contact Alexander Melese Information CEPF Region: Sheka Zone (Masha Woreda, AnderchaWoreda, YekiWoreda, Masha Town Administration, Tepi Town Administration) Strategic Direction: Direction 1, to mainstream biodiversity into wider development policies, plans and projects to deliver the co-benefits of biodiversity conservation, improved local livelihoods and economic development in priority corridors. Grant Amount: $ 20,000.00 Project Dates: March 1, 2016 – February 28, 2017 Implementation Partners for this Project (please explain the level of involvement for each partner): • Sheka zone Bureau of Forest and Environment unit: as a key stakeholder in the area of environmental conservation; • Sheka zone Bureau of Labor and Social Affairs: the bureau has a stake regarding employment, and socio-economic activities; • Sheka zone Investment unit: the bureau is key stakeholder as it serves as the private sector’s unified voice. • Private organizations operating in the area: there are nearly forty five big and small scale tea and coffee development plantations. Conservation Impacts Please explain/describe how your project has contributed to the implementation of the CEPF ecosystem profile. Please summarize the overall results/impact of your project against the expected results detailed in the approved proposal. The aforementioned activities have the following output/result: 1. A standard training manual on environmental conservation and CSR is developed by TH consultancy firm based on winning a bid for call for consultancy advertised on the Daily monitor May 26, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Demography and Health
    SNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna, July 2014 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org 2 SNNPR is one of the largest regions in Ethiopia, accounting for more than 10 percent of the country’s land area [1]. The mid-2008 population is estimated at nearly 16,000,000; almost a fifth of the country’s population. With less than one in tenth of its population (8.9%) living in urban areas in 2008 the region is overwhelmingly rural. "The region is divided into 13 administrative zones, 133 Woredas and 3512 Kebeles, and its capital is Awassa." [1] "The SNNPR is an extremely ethnically diverse region of Ethiopia, inhabited by more than 80 ethnic groups, of which over 45 (or 56 percent) are indigenous to the region (CSA 1996). These ethnic groups are distinguished by different languages, cultures, and socioeconomic organizations. Although none of the indigenous ethnic groups dominates the ethnic makeup of the national population, there is a considerable ethnic imbalance within the region. The largest ethnic groups in the SNNPR are the Sidama (17.6 percent), Wolayta (11.7 percent), Gurage (8.8 percent), Hadiya (8.4 percent), Selite (7.1 percent), Gamo (6.7 percent), Keffa (5.3 percent), Gedeo (4.4 percent), and Kembata (4.3 percent) …. While the Sidama are the largest ethnic group in the region, each ethnic group is numerically dominant in its respective administrative zone, and there are large minority ethnic groups in each zone. The languages spoken in the SNNPR can be classified into four linguistic families: Cushitic, Nilotic, Omotic, and Semitic.
    [Show full text]