DOCSLIB.ORG

Redalyc.Decapod Crustaceans from the Paleocene of Central Texas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas ISSN: 1026-8774 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Armstrong, Adam; Nyborg, Torrey; Bishop, Gale A.; Ossó-Morales, Àlex; Vega, Francisco J. Decapod crustaceans from the Paleocene of Central Texas, USA Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, vol. 26, núm. 3, noviembre, 2009, pp. 745-763 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Querétaro, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57214953015 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas,Decapod v. crustaceans 26, núm. 3, from2009, the p. 745-763Paleocene of Central Texas, USA 745 Decapod crustaceans from the Paleocene of Central Texas, USA Adam Armstrong1, Torrey Nyborg2, Gale A. Bishop3, Àlex Ossó-Morales4, and Francisco J. Vega5,* 1 306 Hilltop Road, Keene, TX 76059, U.S.A. 2 Department of Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350, U.S.A. 3 Department of Geology and Geography, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, U.S.A. 4 Josep Vicenç Foix, 12-H, 1er-1ª 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain. 5 Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, México DF 04510, Mexico. * [email protected] ABSTRACT Fourteen species of decapods crustaceans are described from a single locality near Mexia, Texas, where Paleocene sediments of the Mexia Clay Member of the Wills Point Formation crop out. The species are represented by Hoploparia sp., Linuparus wilcoxensis Rathbun, 1935, an unnamed paguroid, Kierionopsis nodosa Davidson, 1966, Pithonoton cardwelli new species, Caloxanthus sp., Macroacaena johnsoni (Rathbun, 1935), new combination, Raninoides bournei (Rathbun, 1928), R. treldenaesensis (Collins and Jakobsen, 2003), Prehepatus sp., Tehuacana americana (Rathbun, 1935), new combination, Costacopluma texana new species, Paraverrucoides alabamensis (Rathbun, 1935) and Viapinnixa mexiaensis new species. Morphological details unknown for previously described species are included. New systematic placements are offered based on recent research. Intraspecifi c morphological variation is documented for the goneplacoid crab Tehuacana americana. Costacopluma texana is the second Paleogene species of that genus in southeastern USA, and because of its abundance represents the most completely described species for the genus. This fauna represents one of the most diverse assemblages of Paleocene crustacean decapods. Key words: Paleocene, Crustacea, Mexia, Texas. RESUMEN Se describen catorce especies de crustáceos decápodos colectados en una sola localidad cercana a Mexia, Texas, en donde afl oran sedimentos del Miembro Arcilloso Mexia de la Formación Wills Point. Las especies están representadas por Hoploparia sp., Linuparus wilcoxensis Rathbun, 1935, un paguroideo indeterminado, Kierionopsis nodosa Davidson, 1966, Pithonoton cardwelli especie nueva, Caloxanthus sp., Macroacaena johnsoni (Rathbun, 1935), combinación nueva, Raninoides bournei (Rathbun, 1928), R. treldenaesensis (Collins y Jakobsen, 2003), Prehepatus sp., Tehuacana americana (Rathbun, 1935) combinación nueva, Costacopluma texana especie nueva, Paraverrucoides alabamensis (Rathbun, 1935) y Viapinnixa mexiaensis especie nueva. Se incluyen detalles morfológicos, no descritos para especies previamente reportadas. Se ofrece una sistemática actualizada, basada en investigaciones recientes. Armstrong, A., Nyborg, T., Bishop, G.A., Ossó-Morales À., Vega, F.J., 2009, Decapod crustaceans from the Paleocene of Central Texas, USA: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, v. 26, núm. 3, p. 745-763. 746 Armstrong et al. Se documenta la variación morfológica intraespecífi ca para el cangrejo goneplacoideo Tehuacana americana. Costacopluma texana es la segunda especie del género en el Paleógeno del sureste de EUA, y debido a la abundancia de ejemplares, es la especie descrita con mayor detalle del género Costacopluma. Esta fauna representa una de las asociaciones más diversas de crustáceos decápodos del Paleoceno. Palabras clave: Paleoceno, Crustacea, Mexia, Texas. INTRODUCTION decapods herein reported. Biostratigraphy is primarily based on foraminifera with good index foraminifera indicative of Decapod crustaceans were collected from a quarry site a Paleocene age (Kellough, 1959; 1965). about two miles west of Mexia, Texas from the Paleocene Specimens, referred to in this study, are deposited Mexia Clay Member of the Wills Point Formation (Figure at the Texas Natural Science Center, Austin (previously 1). The Wills Point Formation is part of the Paleocene Paleontological Collection of the Bureau of Economic Midway Group of the East Texas Basin (McGowen et al., Geology, University of Texas), under acronym NPL, and 1972; Oldani, 1988; Barnes et al., 1992). Deposition of Museu de Geologia del Seminari de Barcelona, under acro- the Midway Group occurred during the Early Paleocene nym MGSB. Classifi cation follows that of Ng et al. (2008) (Danian) associated with a major transgression following and Števčić (2005). the Cretaceous-Tertiary event. The maximum advance of this transgression is represented by the outer neritic deposits of the Mexia Clay Member (Kellough, 1965; Oldani, 1988). SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY The Midway Group is the lowermost stratigraphic Tertiary unit within the East Texas Basin, separated from the underly- Order Decapoda Latreille, 1802 ing Gulfi an Cretaceous Navarro Group by a biostratigraphic Infraorder Astacidea Latreille, 1802 and depositional hiatus. The Mexia Clay Member is con- Superfamily Nephropoidea Dana, 1852 formably overlain by the Paleocene-Eocene Wilcox Group Family Nephropidae Dana, 1852 (Oldani, 1988). In east Texas, the Midway Group consists Genus Hoploparia McCoy, 1849 of two formations (Kincaid and Wills Point formations), each with three members (Oldani, 1988) (Figure 2). The Type species. Astacus longimanus Sowerby, 1826, by sub- thickness of the Midway Group, within the East Texas Basin, sequent designation of Rathbun, 1926. varies between 120 and 550 m; it is more than 300 m at the border of Limestone and Navarro counties, near the town of Hoploparia sp. Tehuacana (Figure 1), and thins to about 120 m at the study Figures 3.1, 3.2 quarry (Oldani, 1988). The Wills Point Formation consists of the basal clays of the Mexia Clay Member, overlain by Description of study material. Cephalothorax small, the silty shales of the Kerens Member, which grade into the elongated, surface covered by small scale-like tubercles, interbedded sands and shales of the Solomon Creek Member much fi ner toward ventral and posterior margins; posterior (Oldani, 1988). Like the Midway Group, the thickness of margin curved, rimmed; postcervical groove deep, slightly the Wills Point Formation varies between 60 and 300 m sinuous; cervical groove one-third the length of postcervi- (Oldani, 1988). In Navarro County it averages 150 to 200 cal groove. m (Oldani, 1988). The Mexia Clay Member consists of dark Material examined. One incomplete cephalothorax and gray, thinly laminated clay shale, bearing pyrite nodules, one fragment of a cheliped, hypotypes NPL31148 and limonite, siderite and calcareous concretions (Kellough, NPL31149. 1965; Oldani, 1988). The Mexia Clay Member averages Measurements (in mm). Hypotype NPL31148 cephalotho- 50 meters making up the bottom quarter of the Wills Point rax length = about 26.0, height = 15.9; hypotype NPL31149 Formation (Kellough, 1965). partial palm length = >21.6, height = >22.0. Abundant decapods, horn corals, scaphopods, pelecy- Discussion. The carapace fragment differs from Hoploparia pods, gastropods, nautiloids, foraminifera, fi sh teeth, and johnsoni Rathbun, 1935 from the middle Eocene of Alabama, some shark teeth occur within the lower part of the Mexia in bearing bigger tubercles directed forward. H. buntingi Clay Member (Kellough, 1965), 6-10 meters above the (Feldmann and Holland, 1971) from the Paleocene of North Tehuacana Limestone. At the study quarry, the basal Mexia Dakota is larger and has a straight postcervical groove. Clay Member is represented by a series of siltstone/claystone H. klebsi Noetling, 1885 from the Paleogene of northern lenses with abundant yellow, brown, and black calcareous Germany is larger and shows coarser tubercles (see also nodules that preserve abundant fossils, including the fossil Förster and Mundlos, 1982). The specimens are too incom- Decapod crustaceans from the Paleocene of Central Texas, USA 747 Discussion. Carapace fragment most resembles the cara- pace features as seen in Linuparus wilcoxensis from the Lower Eocene of Wilcox, Alabama. Compared with the type specimen figured by Rathbun (1935, fig. 16.13), the specimen from Mexia is smaller and ridges of the gastric area define a lanceolate shape, instead of being subparallel. A more complete specimen reported by Vega et al. (2007, fig. 4.9) from the Paleocene of Coahuila, northeastern Mexico, show a lanceolate shape for the ridges of the gastric area. More complete specimens are necessary to define a specific affinity. Infraorder Anomura MacLeay, 1838 Superfamily Paguroidea Latreille, 1802 Paguroidea, gen. and sp. indet. Figures 3.4, 3.5 Figure 1. Location map of fossil locality east of Mexia, Limestone County, Texas. Description of study material. Right
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans

    A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans

    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
  • Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade

    Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade

    Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade AUSTIN B. WILLIAMS Introduction tons to pounds to conform with US. tinents and islands, shoal platforms, and fishery statistics). This total includes certain seamounts (Fig. 1 and 2). More­ Lobsters are valued throughout the clawed lobsters, spiny and flat lobsters, over, the world distribution of these world as prime seafood items wherever and squat lobsters or langostinos (Tables animals can also be divided rougWy into they are caught, sold, or consumed. 1 and 2). temperate, subtropical, and tropical Basically, three kinds are marketed for Fisheries for these animals are de­ temperature zones. From such partition­ food, the clawed lobsters (superfamily cidedly concentrated in certain areas of ing, the following facts regarding lob­ Nephropoidea), the squat lobsters the world because of species distribu­ ster fisheries emerge. (family Galatheidae), and the spiny or tion, and this can be recognized by Clawed lobster fisheries (superfamily nonclawed lobsters (superfamily noting regional and species catches. The Nephropoidea) are concentrated in the Palinuroidea) . Food and Agriculture Organization of temperate North Atlantic region, al­ The US. market in clawed lobsters is the United Nations (FAO) has divided though there is minor fishing for them dominated by whole living American the world into 27 major fishing areas for in cooler waters at the edge of the con­ lobsters, Homarus americanus, caught the purpose of reporting fishery statis­ tinental platform in the Gul f of Mexico, off the northeastern United States and tics. Nineteen of these are marine fish­ Caribbean Sea (Roe, 1966), western southeastern Canada, but certain ing areas, but lobster distribution is South Atlantic along the coast of Brazil, smaller species of clawed lobsters from restricted to only 14 of them, i.e.
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World

    Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World

    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
  • 1 Crustaceans in Cold Seep Ecosystems: Fossil Record, Geographic Distribution, Taxonomic Composition, 2 and Biology 3 4 Adiël A

    1 Crustaceans in Cold Seep Ecosystems: Fossil Record, Geographic Distribution, Taxonomic Composition, 2 and Biology 3 4 Adiël A

    1 Crustaceans in cold seep ecosystems: fossil record, geographic distribution, taxonomic composition, 2 and biology 3 4 Adiël A. Klompmaker1, Torrey Nyborg2, Jamie Brezina3 & Yusuke Ando4 5 6 1Department of Integrative Biology & Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, 1005 7 Valley Life Sciences Building #3140, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Email: [email protected] 8 9 2Department of Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. 10 Email: [email protected] 11 12 3South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA. Email: 13 [email protected] 14 15 4Mizunami Fossil Museum, 1-47, Yamanouchi, Akeyo-cho, Mizunami, Gifu, 509-6132, Japan. 16 Email: [email protected] 17 18 This preprint has been submitted for publication in the Topics in Geobiology volume “Ancient Methane 19 Seeps and Cognate Communities”. Specimen figures are excluded in this preprint because permissions 20 were only received for the peer-reviewed publication. 21 22 Introduction 23 24 Crustaceans are abundant inhabitants of today’s cold seep environments (Chevaldonné and Olu 1996; 25 Martin and Haney 2005; Karanovic and Brandão 2015), and could play an important role in structuring 26 seep ecosystems. Cold seeps fluids provide an additional source of energy for various sulfide- and 27 hydrocarbon-harvesting bacteria, often in symbiosis with invertebrates, attracting a variety of other 28 organisms including crustaceans (e.g., Levin 2005; Vanreusel et al. 2009; Vrijenhoek 2013). The 29 percentage of crustaceans of all macrofaunal specimens is highly variable locally in modern seeps, from 30 0–>50% (Dando et al. 1991; Levin et al.
  • A New Classification of the Xanthoidea Sensu Lato

    A New Classification of the Xanthoidea Sensu Lato

    Contributions to Zoology, 75 (1/2) 23-73 (2006) A new classifi cation of the Xanthoidea sensu lato (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) based on phylogenetic analysis and traditional systematics and evaluation of all fossil Xanthoidea sensu lato Hiroaki Karasawa1, Carrie E. Schweitzer2 1Mizunami Fossil Museum, Yamanouchi, Akeyo, Mizunami, Gifu 509-6132, Japan, e-mail: GHA06103@nifty. com; 2Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Xanthoidea, Portunidae, systematics, phylogeny Abstract Family Pilumnidae ............................................................. 47 Family Pseudorhombilidae ............................................... 49 A phylogenetic analysis was conducted including representatives Family Trapeziidae ............................................................. 49 from all recognized extant and extinct families of the Xanthoidea Family Xanthidae ............................................................... 50 sensu lato, resulting in one new family, Hypothalassiidae. Four Superfamily Xanthoidea incertae sedis ............................... 50 xanthoid families are elevated to superfamily status, resulting in Superfamily Eriphioidea ......................................................... 51 Carpilioidea, Pilumnoidoidea, Eriphioidea, Progeryonoidea, and Family Platyxanthidae ....................................................... 52 Goneplacoidea, and numerous subfamilies are elevated
  • How to Become a Crab: Phenotypic Constraints on a Recurring Body Plan

    How to Become a Crab: Phenotypic Constraints on a Recurring Body Plan

    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 25 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0664.v1 How to become a crab: Phenotypic constraints on a recurring body plan Joanna M. Wolfe1*, Javier Luque1,2,3, Heather D. Bracken-Grissom4 1 Museum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa–Ancon, 0843–03092, Panama, Panama 3 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, USA 4 Institute of Environment and Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Biscayne Bay Campus, 3000 NE 151 Street, North Miami, FL 33181, USA * E-mail: [email protected] Summary: A fundamental question in biology is whether phenotypes can be predicted by ecological or genomic rules. For over 140 years, convergent evolution of the crab-like body plan (with a wide and flattened shape, and a bent abdomen) at least five times in decapod crustaceans has been known as ‘carcinization’. The repeated loss of this body plan has been identified as ‘decarcinization’. We offer phylogenetic strategies to include poorly known groups, and direct evidence from fossils, that will resolve the pattern of crab evolution and the degree of phenotypic variation within crabs. Proposed ecological advantages of the crab body are summarized into a hypothesis of phenotypic integration suggesting correlated evolution of the carapace shape and abdomen. Our premise provides fertile ground for future studies of the genomic and developmental basis, and the predictability, of the crab-like body form. Keywords: Crustacea, Anomura, Brachyura, Carcinization, Phylogeny, Convergent evolution, Morphological integration 1 © 2020 by the author(s).
  • The Crabs from Mayotte Island (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura)

    The Crabs from Mayotte Island (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura)

    THE CRABS FROM MAYOTTE ISLAND (CRUSTACEA, DECAPODA, BRACHYURA) Joseph Poupin, Régis Cleva, Jean-Marie Bouchard, Vincent Dinhut, and Jacques Dumas Atoll Research Bulletin No. 617 1 May 2018 Washington, D.C. All statements made in papers published in the Atoll Research Bulletin are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Smithsonian Institution or of the editors of the bulletin. Articles submitted for publication in the Atoll Research Bulletin should be original papers and must be made available by authors for open access publication. Manuscripts should be consistent with the “Author Formatting Guidelines for Publication in the Atoll Research Bulletin.” All submissions to the bulletin are peer reviewed and, after revision, are evaluated prior to acceptance and publication through the publisher’s open access portal, Open SI (http://opensi.si.edu). Published by SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SCHOLARLY PRESS P.O. Box 37012, MRC 957 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 https://scholarlypress.si.edu/ The rights to all text and images in this publication are owned either by the contributing authors or by third parties. Fair use of materials is permitted for personal, educational, or noncommercial purposes. Users must cite author and source of content, must not alter or modify the content, and must comply with all other terms or restrictions that may be applicable. Users are responsible for securing permission from a rights holder for any other use. ISSN: 0077-5630 (online) This work is dedicated to our friend Alain Crosnier, great contributor for crab sampling in Mayotte region between 1958-1971 and author of several important taxonomic contributions in the region.
  • Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)

    Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)

    Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 ..................................
  • A Tribute to Pál Müller; His Life, Career and Scientific Output

    A Tribute to Pál Müller; His Life, Career and Scientific Output

    A tribute to Pál Müller; his life, career and scientific output M. Hyžný, B.W.M. van Bakel, R.H.B. Fraaije, J.W.M. Jagt, M. Krobicki & I. Magyar Hyžný, M., Van Bakel, B.W.M., Fraaije, R.H.B., Jagt, J.W.M., Krobicki, M. & Magyar, I. A tribute to Pál Müller; his life, career and scientific output. In: Fraaije, R.H.B., Hyžný, M., Jagt, J.W.M., Krobicki, M. & Van Bakel, B.W.M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Mesozoic and Cenozoic Decapod Crustaceans, Krakow, Poland, 2013: A tribute to Pál Mihály Müller. Scripta Geologica, 147: 9-20, 12 figs. Leiden, October 2014. Matúš Hyžný, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria, and Department of Geology and Palaeontology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina G1, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia ([email protected]); Barry W.M. van Bakel, Oertijdmuseum De Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, 5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands, and Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands ([email protected]); René H.B. Fraaije, Oertijdmuseum De Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, 5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands ([email protected]); John W.M. Jagt, Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, de Bosquetplein 6-7, 6211 KJ Maastricht, the Netherlands ([email protected]); Michał Krobicki, Polish Geological Institute – National Research Institute, Królowej Jadwigi 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland ([email protected]), and AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland ([email protected]); Imre Mag- yar, MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Plc., Október 23.
  • (Crustacea) As Predators on Mollusca Through Geologic Time

    (Crustacea) As Predators on Mollusca Through Geologic Time

    PALAIOS, 2010, v. 25, p. 167–182 Research Article DOI: 10.2110/palo.2009.p09-054r THE DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA) AS PREDATORS ON MOLLUSCA THROUGH GEOLOGIC TIME CARRIE E. SCHWEITZER1* and RODNEY M. FELDMANN 2 1Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720, USA; 2Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT decapods and lineages known to have modern congeners that are durophagous. The relationship between predator and prey is a persistent theme in There are five major means by which decapods crush shells or eat marine paleontology. Herein we focus on the decapod Crustacea, the shelled prey that, as they require specialization of the appendages (see shrimps, lobsters, and crabs, and their role as predators on the Mollusca Lau, 1987 on extant forms), might be recorded in the body fossil record. through geologic time. Five major means by which decapods crush shells There are also several types of feeding that may only chip the shells or or eat shelled prey might be recorded in the body-fossil record, as they simply pry them open, which are often not apparent in the fossil record. require specialization of the appendages. These include use of (1) All types of feeding on shelled organisms must affect evolution of the heterochelous first pereiopods, (2) molariform teeth on the fingers of shelled organism, based on recent studies that illustrate how predation the chelae, (3) a curved proximal tooth on the movable finger of the chela, takes precedence over other aspects of the environment in driving (4) calcified mandibles, and (5) flattened pereiopods (walking legs).
  • Zootaxa, Rhadinoplax, a New Genus of Progeryonidae Stevcic, 2005

    Zootaxa, Rhadinoplax, a New Genus of Progeryonidae Stevcic, 2005

    Zootaxa 1777: 53–68 (2008) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Rhadinoplax, a new genus of Progeryonidae Števčić, 2005, for Carcinoplax microphthalmus Guinot & Richer de Forges, 1981, and a redescription of Paragalene longicrura (Nardo, 1868) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Goneplacoidea) PETER CASTRO1 & PETER K. L. NG2 1Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California 91768-4032, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Rhadinoplax, new genus, is described for Carcinoplax microphthalmus Guinot & Richer de Forges, 1981, a species pre- viously included in the family Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838. The new genus is transferred to the family Progeryonidae Števčić, 2005, superfamily Goneplacoidea. The poorly known progeryonid, Paragalene Kossmann, 1878, is also redescribed and figured. Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Goneplacoidea, Progeryonidae, Rhadinoplax new genus, Carcinoplax microphthalmus, Paragalene longicrura, Progeryon Introduction In his revision of the Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838, Castro (2007) left the status of Carcinoplax microphthal- mus Guinot & Richer de Forges, 1981, unresolved. He stated that while it was clearly not a species of Carci- noplax H. Milne Edwards, 1852, it was also not a member of the Goneplacidae as he defined it, and commented that it had affinities with the Euryplacidae Stimpson, 1871. Similarly, the affinities of the poorly known Paragalene longicrura (Nardo, 1868) have not been clear, although it was most recently referred to the Progeryonidae Števčić, 2005, by Ng & Manuel-Santos (2007). The problems of the Goneplacidae and Goneplacoidea are challenging, and often confusing (see Guinot & Breton 2006; Ng & Manuel-Santos 2007; Castro 2007), but the situation has become much clearer in recent years.
  • The Massive Death of Lobsters Smothered Within Their Thalassinoides Burrows: the Example of the Lower Barremian from Lusitanian Basin (Portugal)

    The Massive Death of Lobsters Smothered Within Their Thalassinoides Burrows: the Example of the Lower Barremian from Lusitanian Basin (Portugal)

    Versão online: http://www.lneg.pt/iedt/unidades/16/paginas/26/30/209 Comunicações Geológicas (2016) 103, Especial I, 143-152 ISSN: 0873-948X; e-ISSN: 1647-581X The massive death of lobsters smothered within their Thalassinoides burrows: the example of the lower Barremian from Lusitanian Basin (Portugal) A morte em massa de lagostas sepultadas no interior das suas galerias do tipo Thalassinoides: o exemplo do Barremiano inferior da Bacia Lusitânica (Portugal) C. Neto de Carvalho 1,* Artigo original © 2014 LNEG – Laboratório Nacional de Geologia e Energia IP Original Article Abstract: Some years ago an exceptional site with the preservation of the evolutiva demonstrada pela ocorrência de Thalassinoides associados a lagostas mecochirid lobster Meyeria rapax (Harbort) within their burrows was glyphoídeos desde o Jurássico Superior ao Aptiano, e à sua progressiva described in the Early Cretaceous of Cabo Espichel sector, Lusitanian Basin, substituição pelos thalassinídeos, com algumas excepções registadas para as Portugal. The large number of articulated specimens preserved at the bottom lagostas queladas, a partir do Cretácico Superior. Esta tendência para a of Thalassinoides burrow systems in, at least, four different beds of the Boca convergência evolutiva no hábito fossorial é comparável com os padrões do Chapim Formation (lower Barremian) suggests that a sudden cyclic event evolutivos de diversificação das lagostas e dos thalassinídeos reconhecidos was responsible for the collective killing below the bottom of a confined recentemente. lagoon, and led to the very rare preservation of both burrows and producers. Palavras-chave: Meyeria rapax ; Thalassinoides suevicus ; morte colectiva; The explanation may be found in the highly heterogranular, coarse-grained convergência comportamental; Barremiano inferior; Bacia Lusitânica clastic filling of the burrow systems which represent influxes of freshwater and large volumes of siliciclastics that may had suddenly drop the salinity 1 Geopark Naturtejo da Meseta Meridional – UNESCO Global Geopark.