Studies on the Ecology and Behaviour of Xj4e

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Studies on the Ecology and Behaviour of Xj4e STUDIES ON THE ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR OF XJ4E- I S 13i--(vrt - t-t Q:!1.\<-(-41- IPC-_,r■rs. tS) L SE GAF 1214WIEta xylostella(1/4-61414441-&.14.6 -) if,LEPIDOPTERA fe#0451=1A7k04FE2 y Pedro Jose Salinas, lng. Agr., M.Sc., D.I.C. A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science, University of London. Department of Zoology and Applied Entomology Imperial College of Science and Technology Field Station, Silwood Park Ascot, Berkshire. June 1972 ABSTRACT Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera : Plutellidae) is a universal pest of cabbage.. Populations of this species were studied both in constant environment rooms and in field conditions. The lengths of the different instars, and the fecundity,, were determined in the laboratory at 20°C. The behaviour of the larvae was recorded with particular emphasis to the recently hatched larvae and to density. The effects of size and shape of the leaves on behaviour. and ' survival of the larvae as well as the effects of starvation in later instar larvae, in the laboratory, were recorded. The. dispersion pattern of the larvae was recorded throughout development. The effects of the leaf toughness on survival was studied. The behaviour of the adults was recorded. In the field, mortality factors were studied by exclusion cage techniques. These included exclusion of birds, soil predators, small aerial predators, parasites and rainfall. Mortalities from the different causes were assessed for the different instars. The importance of overlapping causes of mortality was demonstrated and as an exercise life tables were constructed. Suggestions are made on how natural methods of'control could be enhanced in order to minimise dependance on insecticides for control of this pest. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1, INTRODUCTION 10 1 1 THE CONCEPT OF PEST 10 1,2. CONTROL OF INSECT PESTS 10 1,3, Plutella xylostella (L.) AS AN IMPORTANT PEST 11 REVIEW OF LITERATURE C . 14 2,1. ECOLOGY OF LEPIDOPTERA 14 2.2. ECOLOGY OF CRUCIFEROUS CROPS.PESTS.. 15 2.2.1, General crucifers pests .15 2.2,2. Pieris spp. 15 2.2,3. Mamestra brassicae L 16 2,2,4. Trichoplusia ni Hubner 17 2, 2.5, Plutella xylostella (L.) 17 2.3. EFFECTS OF DENSITY 19 2.3,1, Effects of density on insects 19 2.3.2, Effects of density on Lepidoptera . 22 2..3,3. Effects of density on Lepidoptera attacking crucifers 24 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE DIFFERENT STAGES OF P. xylostella 26 3.1, THE EGG 26, 3,2, THE LARVA 27 3.3. THE PRE-PUPA 27 • 3,4. THE PUPA 28 2 Page 3. 5. THE ADULT 29 4. LIFE HISTORY• 31 4.1. INTRODUCTION 31 4.2, MATERIALS AND METHODS 31 4,2.1. The rooms 31, 4.2.2. The cages 32 •4,2, 3. The leaf discs 32 4,2,4. The experiments 33 4,3, RESULTS 33 4, 3, 1. Developmental time 33 4.3.2, Longevity and fecundity 34 4.4, DISCUSSION 40 5. BEHAVIOUR 43 5„ 1. INTRODUCTION 43 5.2. MATERIAL AND METHODS 44 5.3. RESULTS 45 5.4. PRE-HATCHING AND HATCHING BEHAVIOUR. 46 5.5. BEHAVIOUR OF THE LARVAE 46 5., 5; 1. stFir.• instar. From hatching to first feeding place 47 Larvae from groups of eggs 47 Larvae from isolated eggs 49 5. 5. 2. First instar 51 5. 5. 3.- Second instar 53 5. 5.4. Third instar 54 5.5,5. Fourth instar 55 5, 5.6. Pre-pupa 55 5.5.7. Pupa 56 • 3 Page 5.6. "SPACING" BEHAVIOUR OF THE LARVAE 57 6. EFFECTS OF THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE LEAVES, AND OF THE DENSITY OF THE LARVAE ON THE BEHAVIOUR, DISPERSION AND SURVIVAL OF P. xylostella 61 6.1. INTRODUCTION 61 6. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 61 6.3. RESULTS 62 6. 3.1. EFFECTS ON LARVAL BEHAVIOUR, DEVELOPMENT, AND MORTALITY. 62 6.3.1.1. Gallery-making stage 62 6. 3. 1. 2. Developmental time (including pr e- pupation) 64 6.3.1.3. Larval mortality 65 6.3.2. EFFECTS ON SIZE AND WEIGHT OF PUPAE AND WEIGHT OF ADULTS . 66 6.4, DISCUSSION 70 7, BEHAVIOUR OF THE LARVAE UNDER STARVATION (THIRD AND FOURTH INSTARS) 72 8. ADULT BEHAVIOUR 75 8.1. NORMAL BEHAVIOUR „ 75 8.2. MATING BEHAVIOUR ....... • • . 75 8.3. OVIPOSITION BEHAVIOUR 78 8. 3. 1. Oviposition substrate preference . 80 Materials and Methods 80 Results . 81 4 Page 8. 3, 2, Leaf position preference 83 Materials and Methods 83 Results .84 9. STUDIES ON CAUSES OF MORTALITY AND ON DIS- PERSION IN LABORATORY POPULATIONS OF P. xylostella .86 9.1. INTRODUCTION 86 9.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 86 9.2.1. The rooms 86 9.2.2. The cages 87 9.2, 3. The plants • -87. 9.2.4. The leaves 87 9, 2, 5. The oviposition cages 90 9.2.6. The stock culture of the larvae 90 9. 3. EXPERIMENT TO DETERMINE DEVELOP- MENT, MORTALITY AND DISPERSION 91 9.3.1. Materials and Methods 92 9, 3.2. Results and Discussion 94 9.4. EXPERIMENT TO DETERMINE DEVELOP- MENT, MORTALITY AND DISPERSION • 97 9 . 4. 1 . Materials and Methods 97 9.4.2. Results and Discussion 99 9.5. EXPERIMENT TO DETERMINE DEVELOP- MENT, MORTALITY AND DISPERSION AT LOW TO HIGH DENSITIES 102 9. 5. 1. Materials and Methods 103 9.5.2. Results and Discussion 104 41 5 Page 9.6. EXPERIMENT TO COMPARE DEVELOP- MENT, MORTALITY AND DISPERSION AT LOW, HIGH AND VERY•HIGH DENSITIES 107 9.6.1. Materials and Methods 107 9.6.2. Results and Discussion 108 9.7. EXPERIMENT TO COMPARE DEVELOP- MENT, MORTALITY AND DISPERSION AT HIGH, LOW AND EXTREMELY LOW (ISOLATED LARVA) DENSITIES, ON TOUGH AND TENDER LEAVES ..... 112 . 9.7,1. Materials and Methods •113 9.7.2. Results and Discussion 114 9.8. EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE DEVELOP- MENT, MORTALITY AND DISPERSION OF ISOLATED AND PAIRED LARVAE, ON TENDER LEAVES 117 9.8.1. Materials and Methods 118 9.8.2, Results andDiscussion 118 9.9. EXPERIMENTS TO COMPARE THE DE- VELOPMENT, MORTALITY AND DIS- PERSION OF THE LARVAE AT DIFFERENT DENSITIES (ISOLATED LARVAE TO HIGH DENSITY) ON DIFFERENT TOUGHNESS AND SIZES OF LEAVES .121 9.9.1. Materials and Methods .121 9.9.2. Results and Discussion 122 • 6 • Page 9.10. EXPERIMENTS WITH PENETROMETER TO COMPARE TEXTURE OF LEAVES . 125 9.10.1. Materials and Methods 125 9.10.2. Results and Discussion 125 9.11. DISPERSION OF THE LARVAE 128 9.11.1. Introduction 128 9.11.2. Materials and Methods 130 • 9.11.3. Results 130 9.11.4. Discussion 131 10. STUDIES ON CAUSES OF MORTALITY IN FIELD POPULATIONS OF P. xylostella .148 10.1. INTRODUCTION 148 10.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 150 10.2.1. The field 150 10.2.2, The plants .150 10.2.3. The exclusion cages 151 10.3. SETTING UP THE FIELD EXPERIMENTS .155 10.3.1. Establishment of field populations. .155 10.3.2. Method of counting .155 10.3.3. Analysis of the data .156 10.4. FIRST FIELD EXPERIMENT (SUMMER 1969) 158 10.4.1. Materials and Methods 158 10.4.2. Results 158 Effects of excluding parasites and predators 158 Effects of excluding birds 170 Effects of excluding rainfall 171 Effects of exposure to all natural enemies and to rain 172 7 Page 10.4.3. Discussion 173 10.5. SECOND FIELD EXPERIMENT (LATE SUMMER-AUTUMN 1969) 182 10, 5.1. Materials and Methods 183 10. 5.2. Results 194 Effects of excluding parasites and predators 194 Effects of excluding birds 195 Effects of excluding rainfall • 195 Effects of exposure to all natural enemies and to rain 197 10. 5. 3. Discussion .198 10.6. THIRD FIELD EXPERIMENT (LATE SUMMER -AUTUMN 1970) 205 10.6.1. Materials and Methods 206 10.6.2. Results 208 Effects of excluding parasites and predators 208 Effects of excluding birds 219 Effects of excluding soil predators 220 Effects of exposure to all natural enemies and to rain 221 Discussion 225 10.7. DISCUSSION 227 10, 7.1. Effects of birds predation 229 10.7.2. Effects of soil predators 230 10.7.3. Effects of parasites 231 10. 7.4. Effects of rainfall 231 10. 7.5. Effects of other factors 232 a 8 • Page 100 8. LIFE- TABT 235 10.8.1 . Introduction o 235 10. 8.2. Materials and methods 235 10. 8. 3. Results -238 10.8.4. Discussion 238 11. DISCUSSION 243 11 . 1, LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS 244 11, 2 FIELD EXPERIMENTS 245 11.2.1. Early instar mortality (up to 3rd instar) 246 11.2, 2. Late instar mortality 247 Parasites 247. - Birds. 248 Soil predators 248 Other predators 249 Other mortality causes 249 11.3. GENERAL REMARKS 249 12. SUMMARY • 252 13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 255 14. REFERENCES 256 15. APPENDICES 15.1. APPENDIX 1. BEHAVIOUR OF THE LARVAE • • • A. 1. Behaviour of the recently hatched larvae • . • A.1.1. Single larva from egg within a batch A.1.2. Single larva from egg separated from batch A.1.3. Group of larvae within a batch . * 8 • Page 10.8. LIFE- TABLES 235 10.8.1, Introduction 235 10.8.2. Materials and methods 235 10.8.3. Results 238 10.8.4. Discussion 238 11. DISCUSSION 243 11.1. LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS . 244 11.2. FIELD EXPERIMENTS 245 11.2.1, Early instar mortality (up to 3rd instar) • 246 11.2.2. Late instar mortality 247 Parasites 247 Birds 248 Soil predators 248 Other predators 249 Other mortality causes 249 11.3.
Recommended publications
  • Dna Sequence Data Indicates the Polyphyl Y of the Family Ctenidae (Araneae )
    1993. The Journal of Arachnology 21 :194–201 DNA SEQUENCE DATA INDICATES THE POLYPHYL Y OF THE FAMILY CTENIDAE (ARANEAE ) Kathrin C . Huber', Thomas S . Haider2, Manfred W . Miiller2, Bernhard A . Huber' , Rudolf J. Schweyen2, and Friedrich G . Barth' : 'Institut fair Zoologie, Althanstr . 14; 1090 Wien; and 2lnstitut fur Mikrobiologie and Genetik; Dr. Bohrgasse 9 ; 1030 Wien (Vienna), Austria . ABSTRACT. Mitochondrial DNA fragments comprising more than 400 bases of the 16S rDNA from nine spider species have been sequenced: Cupiennius salei, C. getazi, C. coccineus and Phoneutria boliviensis (Ctenidae), Pisaura mirabilis, Dolomedes fimbriatus (Pisauridae), Pardosa agrestis (Lycosidae), Clubiona pallidula (Clubi- onidae) and Ryuthela nishihirai (syn. Heptathela nishihirai; Heptathelidae: Mesothelae). Sequence divergence ranges from 3–4% among Cupiennius species and up to 36% in pairwise comparisons of the more distantly related spider DNAs. Maximally parsimonious gene trees based on these sequences indicate that Phoneutri a and Cupiennius are the most distantly related species of the examined Lycosoidea . The monophyly of the family Ctenidae is therefore doubted ; and a revision of the family, which should include DNA-data, is needed . Cupiennius salei (Ctenidae) is one of the most get a high copy number of the DNA segment of extensively studied species of spiders (see Lach - interest. The PCR depends on the availability of muth et al. 1985). The phylogeny of the Ctenidae , oligonucleotides that specifically bind to the a mainly South and Central American family, i s flanking sequences of this DNA segment. These poorly understood ; and systematists propose oligonucleotides serve as primers for a polymer- highly contradicting views on its classification ization reaction that copies the segment in vitro.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Gift Carrying in the Spider Pisaura Mirabilis: Nuptial Gift Contents in Nature and Effects on Male Running Speed and fighting Success
    Animal Behaviour 83 (2012) 1395e1399 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Gift carrying in the spider Pisaura mirabilis: nuptial gift contents in nature and effects on male running speed and fighting success Pavol Prokop a,b,1, Michael R. Maxwell c,* a Department of Biology, Trnava University, Trnava, Slovakia b Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia c Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, National University, La Jolla, CA, U.S.A. article info Males of the spider Pisaura mirabilis offer prey items as nuptial gifts to females. While gift giving in this Article history: species has received attention in captivity, the ecological context of these gifts remains largely unknown. Received 7 December 2011 First, we examine the occurrence of gift carrying by males in nature. Field data reveal that gift-carrying Initial acceptance 16 January 2012 males are frequent in nature (40% of captured males), and that all gifts contain fresh arthropod prey. Gift Final acceptance 15 February 2012 mass was positively correlated with the longest diameter of the gift. Thus, males do not appear to ‘cheat’ Available online 6 April 2012 by inflating their gifts with inedible items, air or loosely wrapped silk. Second, we examine two MS. number: A11-000976R ecological costs to gift-carrying males: the effects of gifts on male running speed and male fighting success. Gift carrying reduced male running speed, but did not affect male fighting success in maleemale Keywords: contests. The former result is the first demonstration of a transportation cost associated with gift fi tness carrying in an arthropod.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection and Alternative Reproductive Tactics in the Nursery-Web Spider Pisaura Mirabilis
    Sexual selection and alternative reproductive tactics in the nursery-web spider Pisaura mirabilis Paolo Giovanni Ghislandi PhD Thesis Sexual selection and alternative reproductive tactics in the nursery-web spider Pisaura mirabilis Paolo Giovanni Ghislandi SpiderLab Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Department of Bioscience Faculty of Science and Technology Aarhus University November 2017 SUPERVISORS: Prof. Trine Bilde Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Denmark Dr. Cristina Tuni Department Biologie II, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Germany CREDITS: Photos: Paolo Ghislandi SpiderLab Logo: Lena Grinsted CITE AS: Ghislandi P.G. (2017). Sexual selection and alternative reproductive tactics in the nursery- web spider Pisaura mirabilis. Ph.D. dissertation. Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Denmark NUMBER OF PAGES: 103 PRINTED BY: Fællestrykkeriet – SUN, Aarhus University Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………….........1 Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Resumé………………………………………………………………………………………….........5 State of the ART……………………………………………………………………………………7 Reproductive tactics in the nursery-web spider Pisaura mirabilis……………………...………11 Types of ARTs: fixed or plastic traits?...........................................................................................15 Which ecological drivers influence the expression and maintenance of ARTs?........................20 References………………………………………………………………………………………….23 Chapter I - Behavioural plasticity and
    [Show full text]
  • The Lynx and Nursery-Web Spider Families in Israël (Araneae, Oxyopidae and Pisauridae)
    The lynx and nursery-web spider families in Israël (Araneae, Oxyopidae and Pisauridae) Gershom LEVY Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology The Hebrew University of Jérusalem Jérusalem 91904 (Israël) Levy G. 1999. — The lynx and nursery-web spider families in Israël (Araneae, Oxyopidae and Pisauridae). Zoosystema2\ (1) : 29-64. ABSTRACT The lynx spiders gênera Oxyopes Latreille, 1804 and Peucetia Thorell, 1869 and the nursery-web spiders of the gênera Pisaura Simon, 1885 and Rothus Simon, 1898 in Israël are revised. Thèse versatile hunters form a conspicuous component of the Middle East vegetation-dwelling spidet fauna. Oxyopes is represented by nine species. Only three out of thèse were formerly reported while the unknown female of one (O. sobrinus O. P.-Cambridge, 1872) is described here for the first time. Three are new species: O. nanulineatus, O. sinaiticus and O. mediterraneus, and three others constitute new records of species with tather disjunct distributions. Oxyopes optabdis O. P.-Cambridge, 1872 is newly synonymized with O. heterophtbalmus (Latreille, 1804), where- as O. attica Hadjissarantos, 1940, O. maracadensis Charitonov, 1946, and O. eymiri Katol, 1967 are new synonyms of O. globifer Simon, 1876. Peucetia was known from Israël only by P. virescens (O. P.-Cambridge, KEYWORDS 1872), however, the maie is illustrated hete for the fitst time. Two additional Araneae, Peucetia species form new records. The possibly endémie Pisaura consocia Oxyopes, Peucetia, (O. P.-Cambridge, 1872) and the taxonomically problematic Palearctic Pisaura, P. mirabilis (Clerck, 1757) are addressed, and the fitst représentative in Asia Rothus, Middle East. of the African genus Rothus is described. ZOOSYSTEMA • 1999 • 21 (1) 29 Levy G.
    [Show full text]
  • Wsn 47(2) (2016) 298-317 Eissn 2392-2192
    Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 47(2) (2016) 298-317 EISSN 2392-2192 Indian Lycosoidea Sundevall (Araneae: Opisthothelae: Araneomorphae) in Different States and Union Territories Including an Annotated Checklist Dhruba Chandra Dhali1,*, P. M. Sureshan1, Kailash Chandra2 1Zoological Survey of India, Western Ghat Regional Centre, Kozkhikore - 673006, India 2Zoological Survey of India, M- Block, New Alipore, Kolkata - 700053, India *E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Annotated checklist of Lycosoidea so far recorded from different states and union territories of India reveals a total of 251 species under 38 genera belonging five families. The review cleared that diversity of lycosoid spider fauna is maximum in West Bengal followed by Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and they are not distributed maximally in the states and union territories within Biodiversity hotspots. This fauna is distributed all over the country. There is nearly 69.35% endemism (in context of India). Keywords: Distribution; Lycosoidea; India; State; Union Territories; Annotated; checklist 1. INTRODUCTION Spiders, composing the order Araneae Clerck, 1757 is the largest group among arachnids and separated into two suborders: Mesothelae Pocock, 1892 (segmented spiders) World Scientific News 47(2) (2016) 298-317 and Opisthothelae Pocock, 1892 (includes all other spiders). Later one is further divided into two infraorders: Mygalomorphae Pocock, 1892 (ancient' spiders) and Araneomorphae Smith, 1902 (modern' spiders include the vast majority of spiders) (Coddington, 2005; WSC, 2015). Araneomorphae composed of 99 families and most of them can be divided into at least six clades and 11 super-families, though some are still unplaced in that system (Zhang, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Distribution of Pisauridae (Araneae: Araneomorphae: Arachnida) in India
    International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 Received: 11-12-2020; Accepted: 13-01-2021; Published: 17-02-2021 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 6; Issue 1; 2021; Page No. 119-125 Diversity and distribution of Pisauridae (Araneae: Araneomorphae: Arachnida) in India Ajeet Kumar Tiwari1, Rajendra Singh2* 1 Department of Zoology, Buddha PG College, Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India 2 Department of Zoology, Deendayal Upadhyay University of Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India Abstract The present article deals with the faunal diversity and distribution of one of the spider family Pisauridae (Araneae: Arachnida), commonly known as nursery web spider, raft spider, fishing spider, in different Indian states and union territories and provides an update checklist based on the literature published up to January 31, 2021. It includes 29 species of spiders described under 11 genera in 18 states and 3 union territories (Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Jammu and Kashmir and Puducherry), out of which 12 species are endemic. The records demonstrated that only 3 species of these spiders are distributed widely: Dendrolycosa gitae (Tikader, 1970) (11 Indian states, 1 union territory), Nilus albocinctus (Doleschall, 1859) (8 Indian states, 1 union territories), and Perenethis venusta L. Koch, 1878 (8 Indian states). Maximum 13 species of these spiders were recorded in Maharashtra followed by 10 species in Tamil Nadu. Keywords: pisauridae, nursery web spider, raft spider, fishing spider, faunal diversity, and checklist Introduction nursery web until their second moult while the female The members of the order Araneae (Arachnida: Chelicerata: stands guard over it. These spiders are moderately large Arthropoda) are commonly known as spiders and ranks (above 10 mm) with long legs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diversity and Ecology of the Spider Communities of European Beech Canopy
    The diversity and ecology of the spider communities of European beech canopy Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Yu-Lung Hsieh geboren in Taipeh, Taiwan Würzburg 2011 In the vegetable as well as in the animal kingdom, the causes of the distribution of species are among the number of mysteries, which natural philosophy cannot reach… —Alexander von Humboldt Table of Contents I. General Introduction……………………………...………………………...…1 II. Effects of tree age on diversity and community structure of arboreal spider: implications for old-growth forest conservation…………………………….11 III. Underestimated spider diversity in a temperate beech forest……………33 IV. Seasonal dynamics of arboreal spider diversity in a temperate forest…….51 V. Neutral and niche theory jointly explain spider diversity within temperate forest canopies…………………………………………………………………69 VI. Biodiversity prediction by applying Verhulst Grey Model (GM 1,1)…....…85 VII. Summary and Outlook………………………………………………………93 VIII. Zusammenfassung und Ausblick……………………………………………99 IX. Acknowledgements………………………………………………………….105 X. Curriculum Vitae and Appendix…………………………………………..107 XI. Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung……………………………………….…………114 Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration. Chapter I General Introduction Canopy research and temperate forests Forests, coral reefs and soil contain the majority of the world’s known biodiversity (Connell 1978; Ozanne et al. 2003; Floren and Schmidl 2008), and as much as half of all the macroscopic life forms are believed to dwell in forest canopies, where they remain insufficiently investigated, or undiscovered entirely (Floren and Schmidl 2008). The study of canopy arthropod communities is a relatively young subfield of ecology, and it can be traced back to the study of the extremely diverse flora and fauna of tropical tree canopies in the late 1970s (Perry 1978; Erwin and Scott 1980; Stork and Hammond 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Gift Carrying in the Spider Pisaura Mirabilis: Nuptial Gift Contents in Nature and Effects on Male Running Speed and fighting Success
    Animal Behaviour 83 (2012) 1395e1399 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Gift carrying in the spider Pisaura mirabilis: nuptial gift contents in nature and effects on male running speed and fighting success Pavol Prokop a,b,1, Michael R. Maxwell c,* a Department of Biology, Trnava University, Trnava, Slovakia b Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia c Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, National University, La Jolla, CA, U.S.A. article info Males of the spider Pisaura mirabilis offer prey items as nuptial gifts to females. While gift giving in this Article history: species has received attention in captivity, the ecological context of these gifts remains largely unknown. Received 7 December 2011 First, we examine the occurrence of gift carrying by males in nature. Field data reveal that gift-carrying Initial acceptance 16 January 2012 males are frequent in nature (40% of captured males), and that all gifts contain fresh arthropod prey. Gift Final acceptance 15 February 2012 mass was positively correlated with the longest diameter of the gift. Thus, males do not appear to ‘cheat’ Available online 6 April 2012 by inflating their gifts with inedible items, air or loosely wrapped silk. Second, we examine two MS. number: A11-000976R ecological costs to gift-carrying males: the effects of gifts on male running speed and male fighting success. Gift carrying reduced male running speed, but did not affect male fighting success in maleemale Keywords: contests. The former result is the first demonstration of a transportation cost associated with gift fi tness carrying in an arthropod.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider World Records: a Resource for Using Organismal Biology As a Hook for Science Learning
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 31 October 2017. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/3972), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Mammola S, Michalik P, Hebets EA, Isaia M. 2017. Record breaking achievements by spiders and the scientists who study them. PeerJ 5:e3972 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3972 Spider World Records: a resource for using organismal biology as a hook for science learning Stefano Mammola Corresp., 1, 2 , Peter Michalik 3 , Eileen A Hebets 4, 5 , Marco Isaia Corresp. 2, 6 1 Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Italy 2 IUCN SSC Spider & Scorpion Specialist Group, Torino, Italy 3 Zoologisches Institut und Museum, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany 4 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA 5 School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, United States 6 Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy Corresponding Authors: Stefano Mammola, Marco Isaia Email address: [email protected], [email protected] The public reputation of spiders is that they are deadly poisonous, brown and nondescript, and hairy and ugly. There are tales describing how they lay eggs in human skin, frequent toilet seats in airports, and crawl into your mouth when you are sleeping. Misinformation about spiders in the popular media and on the World Wide Web is rampant, leading to distorted perceptions and negative feelings about spiders. Despite these negative feelings, however, spiders offer intrigue and mystery and can be used to effectively engage even arachnophobic individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Süßwasserfauna Von Mitteleuropa, Vol. 7/2-1 Chelicerata: Araneae/Acari I Gerecke (Ed.) Chelicerata: Araneae, Acari I Süßwasserfauna Von Mitteleuropa Begründet Von A
    Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa Reinhard Gerecke Editor Ilse Bartsch · Kees Davids · Ralf Deichsel Antonio Di Sabatino · Grzegorz Gabryś · Reinhard Gerecke Terence Gledhill · Peter Jäger · Joanna Makol · Harry Smit Henk van der Hammen · Gerd Weigmann Andreas Wohltmann · Eberhard Wurst Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa, Vol. 7/2-1 Chelicerata: Araneae/Acari I Gerecke (ed.) Chelicerata: Araneae, Acari I Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa Begründet von A. Brauer Herausgegeben von J. Schwoerbel (†) und P. Zwick Stellvertretender Herausgeber für Band 7: R. Gerecke Band 7/2-1 To the memory of Jürgen Schwoerbel (1930–2002) who took the initiative for the new edition of the Brauer series and coordinated the first steps of the the production of this volume. Ilse Bartsch Kees Davids Ralf Deichsel Antonio Di Sabatino Grzegorz Gabryś Reinhard Gerecke Terence Gledhill Peter Jäger Joanna Mąkol Harry Smit Henk van der Hammen Gerd Weigmann Andreas Wohltmann Eberhard Wurst Chelicerata: Araneae, Acari I Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa 7/2-1 Ilse Bartsch Peter Jäger Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland Frankfurt, Deutschland Kees Davids Joanna Makol Amsterdam, Niederlande Wroclaw, Polen Ralf Deichsel Harry Smit Berlin, Deutschland Amsterdam, Niederlande Antonio Di Sabatino Henk van der Hammen Coppito L’Aquila, Italien Amsterdam, Niederlande Grzegorz Gabrys´ Gerd Weigmann Zielona Góra, Polen Berlin, Deutschland Reinhard Gerecke Andreas Wohltmann Tübingen, Deutschland Bremen, Deutschland Terence Gledhill Eberhard Wurst Kendal, Großbritannien Stuttgart, Deutschland Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa ISBN 978-3-662-55957-4 ISBN 978-3-662-55958-1 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55958-1 Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detail- lierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar.
    [Show full text]