Haines Highway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Haines Highway HAINES HIGHWAY MP 3.5 TO MP 25.3 HAINES, ALASKA FINAL REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION August 2016 DOT&PF Project No. Z686060000 FEDERAL Project No. 0956028 NOTICE: PROJECT NAME CHANGE Throughout the development of this project it has been known by the name Haines Highway MP 3.5 to MP 25.3. The title of the project has been corrected to be more accurate. The old title is used throughout this Final Revised Environmental Assessment and associated documents, but the formal name of the project moving forward is Haines Highway Reconstruction Milepost 3.9 to 25.0. The area studied remains exactly the same, only the title has changed. TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT The State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities hereby gives public notice that it is the policy of the State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities to assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. Title VI and related nondiscrimination statutes requires that no person in the United States of America shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, national origin, disability, or age, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities receives federal financial assistance. Persons with hearing impairments may call 1-800-770-8973. LIMITATION OF CLAIMS NOTICE Per Section 1308 of the Federal Highway Administration Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), a Federal agency may publish a notice in the Federal Register, pursuant to 23 USC §139(l)(1), indicating that one or more Federal agencies have taken final action on permits, licenses, or approvals for a transportation project. If such notice is published, claims seeking judicial review of those Federal agency actions will be barred unless such claims are filed within 150 days after the date of publication of the notice, or within such shorter time period as is specified in the Federal laws pursuant to which judicial review of the Federal agency action is allowed. If no notice is published, then the periods of time that otherwise are provided by the Federal laws governing such claims will apply. (This Page Left Intentionally Blank) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The Haines Highway begins in Haines, Alaska and ends in Haines Junction, Yukon Territory, Canada. The project area is primarily located along the eastern side of the Chilkat River from Milepost 3.5, near the Haines Airport, to Milepost 25.3, north of Klukwan and the Chilkat River Bridge. Except for the project area, the Haines Highway in Alaska is constructed to a 55 mile- per-hour standard, e.g. a total pavement width of 36 feet and curves that allow a vehicle to travel safely at 55 miles per hour under normal weather conditions. The highway generally follows a travel corridor used for centuries by the Chilkat Tlingit as well as the Dalton Trail established in the 1890s from Haines to Klukshu Lake in the Yukon Territory (Gates, 2012). Haines Highway was originally constructed in 1943 and has been periodically upgraded over the years, with the portion from the Bluffs (Milepost 25.3) to the Canadian border (Milepost 40) being the most recently upgraded in 2000. The State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, in partnership with Federal Highway Administration—Alaska Division proposes to upgrade Haines Highway from Milepost 3.5 to Milepost 25.3 to be consistent with the upgraded portions on either side of the proposed project (from Milepost 1 to Milepost 3.5 and from Milepost 25 to the border). This Final Revised Environmental Assessment was prepared in response to comments received on the Draft Revised Environmental Assessment issued in October 2015 and the public review Environmental Assessment released in July 2013. Comments from the public and agencies stated that the July 2013 Environmental Assessment Proposed Action would result in unacceptable impacts to Chilkat Valley’s resources, in particular to fish habitat in the Chilkat River and the Alaska Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve. The Alaska Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve is near and adjacent to the Haines Highway from about Milepost 10 through Milepost 23.5. The State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and Federal Highway Administration considered all comments received and developed a Revised Proposed Action that further avoided and minimized impacts to bald eagle and fish habitat; resources of particular concern to residents of Haines and Klukwan. Additional measures have been added to mitigate for impacts to the Chilkat River bank from the proposed hardening of the upgraded roadway embankments. Haines Highway MP 3.5 to MP 25.3 Final Revised EA Page I DOT&PF/Federal Project Nos. Z686060000/0956028 Purpose and Need for the Project The Haines Highway is a major highway linking Southeast Alaska with the intercontinental network of roads and is the primary surface transportation link between Southeast Alaska and Interior Alaska. The Haines Highway originates in Haines, Alaska and ends at its intersection with the Alaska Highway in Haines Junction, Yukon Territory, Canada. The purpose of this project is to address: • highway deficiencies between Milepost 3.5 and Milepost 25.3; • bridge deficiencies; • highway instability and temporary closures caused by debris and water flooding; and • recreational access deficiencies. To be consistent with the rest of the Haines Highway from Haines to the Canadian border, the portion of the highway between Milepost 3.5 and Milepost 25.3 would be brought up to design standards for a 55 mile-per-hour design speed. Specific deficiencies are discussed Section 2.0, Purpose and Need. Revised Proposed Action The Revised Proposed Action has been developed to address the needs for the project while avoiding or minimizing environmental impacts. As noted above, the Revised Proposed Action was developed to address comments received from the public and agencies after release of the July 2013 Environmental Assessment. A summary of changes to potential impacts that have come about from the highway design changes is given in the following table (Table ES-1). Page II Haines Highway MP 3.5 to MP 25.3 Final Revised EA DOT&PF/Federal Project Nos. Z686060000/0956028 Table ES-1: Effects of Main Design Changes between the July 2013 Environmental Assessment and the Revised Proposed Alignment Design Change Effect Reduced the right-of-way acquisition within the Preserve from 3.8 acres to 2.98 acres Reduced fill in the Chilkat River from 7.7 acres to 3.6 acres Reduced fill in wetlands from 23.6 acres to 22.2 acres, including a reduction of fill in 0.9 Reduced the extent of passing zones by acre of high value wetlands near Milepost 10 retaining some existing curves Reduced the linear feet of fill in the Chilkat River from 15,550 linear feet to 12,662 linear feet Increased the fill in tributary streams by 720 linear feet Shifted alignment in the Milepost 4 area away Avoided impacts to cultural resources from the uphill side of the road In addition to design changes, the State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities performed supplemental environmental analyses and proposed additional mitigation measures to compensate for the proposed impacts. The additional design changes and environmental studies undertaken as a result of public and agency comments include: • minimizing the amount of clearing required adjacent to the Alaska Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve, • conducting further environmental studies to address the potential to impact to bald eagles in the project area and to determine the likelihood of significant impacts to bald eagles; the results of the studies indicate no significant impact to bald eagles would likely occur as a result of the project, • proposing a new turnout at Milepost 20.5 to mitigate for impacts to eagle viewing within the Alaska Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve; in supplemental environmental surveys, this location was found to be a popular area of concentration for bald eagles, and • proposing additional mitigation features that include woody debris, rocks and vegetated riverbanks outboard of rock embankment. These features have been developed in consultation with Alaska Department of Fish and Game, United States Fish and Wildlife Haines Highway MP 3.5 to MP 25.3 Final Revised EA Page III DOT&PF/Federal Project Nos. Z686060000/0956028 Service and National Marine Fisheries Service. These are measures to replace lost riverside fish habitat. The measures consist of installing systems composed of logs, root wads, and boulders selectively placed in and on the riverbank. These systems would support restoration of slope vegetation, modulation of flow velocities and deposition of in-stream sediments for fish habitat. Public and agency suggestions were made to reduce the design speed standard of 55 miles per hour throughout the highway or at least in the Critical Habitat Area of the Alaska Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve. As discussed in more detail in Section 3.0, Alternatives, the State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and the Federal Highway Administration evaluated whether this was a prudent way to minimize impacts. That evaluation concluded that factors including the classification of Haines Highway as a principal arterial, the rolling terrain, the relatively few number of driveways and approach roads, and the operating speeds of motorists on the existing road, all indicate that an appropriate minimum design speed is 55 miles per hour. The Revised Proposed Action includes the following components. Improvements to Haines Highway • Realign sections of the highway and straighten some curves to meet 55 mile-per-hour design standards, with the exception of two curves, and add passing zones (See Figure Set A).
Recommended publications
  • National Road N12 Section 6: Victoria West to Britstown
    STAATSKOERANT, 15 OKTOBER 2010 NO.33630 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT No. 904 15 October 2010 THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LIMITED Registration No: 98109584106 DECLARATION AMENDMENT OF NATIONAL ROAD N12 SECTION 6 AMENDMENT OF DECLARATION No. 631 OF 2005 By virtue of section 40(1)(b) of the South African National Roads Agency Limited and the National Roads Act, 1998 (Act NO.7 of 1998), I hereby amend Declaration No. 631 of 2005, by substituting the descriptive section of the route from Victoria West up to Britstown, with the subjoined sheets 1 to 27 of Plan No. P727/08. (National Road N12 Section 6: Victoria West - Britstown) VI ~/ o8 ~I ~ ~ ... ... CD +' +' f->< >< >< lli.S..E..I VICTORIA WEST / Ul ~ '-l Ul ;Ii; o o -// m y 250 »JJ z _-i ERF 2614 U1 iii,..:.. "- \D o lL. C\J a­ Q:: lL. _<n lLJ ~ Q:: OJ olLJ lL. m ~ Q:: Q) lLJ JJ N12/5 lL. ~ fj- Q:: ~ I\J a DECLARATION VICTORIA lLJ ... ... .... PLAN No. P745/09 +' a REM 550 +' :£ >< y -/7 0 >< WEST >< 25 Vel von stel die podreserwe voor von 'n gedeelte Z Die Suid Afrikoonse Nosionole Podogentskop 8eperk Die figuur getoon Sheet 1 of 27 a represents the rood reserve of 0 portion ~:~:~:~: ~ :~: ~:~:~:~:~:~ The figure shown w The South African Notional Roods Agency Limited ........... von Nosionole Roete Seksie 6 Plan w :.:-:-:-:.:.:-:.:-:-:.: N12 OJ of Notional Route Section P727108 w a D.O.9.A • U1 01 o II') g 01' ICTORIA0' z "­ o o (i: WEST \V II> ..... REM ERF 9~5 II') w ...
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration of Existing Provincial Road P16 Section 1 As
    STAATSKOERANT, 28 SEPTEMBER 2012 No. 35719 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT No. 784 28 September 2012 THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED Registration No: 98/09584/06 A. DECLARATION OF EXISTING PROVINCIAL ROAD- PROVINCIAL ROAD P16 SECTION 1 AS NATIONAL ROAD R24- DISTRICT OF RUSTENBURG, IN THE NORTH-WEST PROVINCE By virtue of Section 40(1 )(a) of The South African National Road Agency Limited and National Roads Act 1998 (Act No. 7 of 1998), I hereby declare the Section of Route R24, also known as Provincial Road P16 Section 1, as declared by all Administrator's Notices which might be relevant to this section of road, commencing from its junction with Provincial District Road 0108, at Rustenburg, from where it proceeds in a general easterly direction along the existing Provincial Road P16 Section 1 up to the junction with the North-West!Gauteng Provincial Border, where it terminates as a National Road. (National Road R24: Rustenburg - North-West/Gauteng Provincial Border, a distance of approximately 31.4km) B. DECLARATION OF EXISTING PROVINCIAL ROADS- (I) PROVINCIAL ROAD P32 SECTION 2 , (II) PROVINCIAL ROAD P32 SECTION 1 AND (Ill) PROVINCIAL ROAD P20 SECTION 3 AS NATIONAL ROAD R30- DISTRICTS OF KLERKSDORP, VENTERSDORP, KOSTER AND RUSTENBURG, IN THE NORTH-WEST PROVINCE By virtue of Section 40(1 )(a) of The South African National Road Agency Limited and National Roads Act 1998 (Act No. 7 of 1998), I hereby declare: I) The Section of Route R30, also known as Provincial Road P32 Section 2, as declared by all Administrator's
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC of SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 567 Pretoria, 28 September 2012 No. 35719 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure G12-104928—A 35719—1 2 No. 35719 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 28 SEPTEMBER 2012 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the sender’s respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. CONTENTS INHOUD Page Gazette Bladsy Koerant No. No. No. No. No. No. GOVERNMENT NOTICE GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWING Transport, Department of Vervoer, Departement van Government Notice Goewermentskennisgewing 784 The South African National Road Agency 784 Wet op die Suid-Afrikaanse Nasionale Limited and National Roads Act Padagentskap Beperk en op Nasionale (7/1998): Declaration of existing provin- Paaie (7/1998): Verklaring van cial road—Provincial Road P16 Section bestaande provinsiale pad—Provinsiale 1 as National Road R24, District of Pad P16 Seksie 1 as Nasionale Pad Rustenburg, in the North West Province 3 35719 R24, distrik van Rustenburg, in die Noord-Wes Provinsie .............................
    [Show full text]
  • JB MARKS GV 2019 TOWNSHIP: VENTERSDORP FARMS Municipal
    JB MARKS GV 2019 TOWNSHIP: VENTERSDORP FARMS Municipal ID Allotment Township Erf Portion Property Description Owner Street No Street Name Deeds Extent Rates Category Market Short comment MP Number 2103 0000 00000000 9000 0000 000000 AVONDZON 7 IQ 7 0 RE/7 ERASMUS DJ OATLANDS 559 8752 AGRICULTURAL 3 870 000 2103 0000 00000001 0000 0000 000000 AVONDZON 7 IQ 7 1 -1/7 ERASMUS DJ OATLANDS 428 2615 AGRICULTURAL 2 780 000 2103 0000 00000002 0000 0000 000000 AVONDZON 7 IQ 7 2 -2/7 ERASMUS DJ OATLANDS 385 4394 AGRICULTURAL 2 500 000 2122 0000 00000000 9000 0000 000000 BIETJIERUS 632 IQ 632 0 RE/632 BC TRUST RYSMIERBULT 286 7391 AGRICULTURAL 5 350 000 2122 0000 00000001 0000 0000 000000 BIETJIERUS 632 IQ 632 1 -1/632 MUISKRAAL LEWENDE TRUST RYSMIERBULT 33 5782 AGRICULTURAL 440 000 2123 0000 00000000 9000 0000 000000 BUCHANSVALE 61 IQ 61 0 RE/61 GENERAL NICE DEVELOPMENT SA PTY LTD BOONS 1012 0811 AGRICULTURAL 9 500 000 2123 0000 00000001 0000 0000 000000 BUCHANSVALE 61 IQ 61 1 -1/61 GENERAL NICE DEVELOPMENT SA PTY LTD BOONS 974 7334 AGRICULTURAL 8 600 000 2123 0000 00000002 0000 0000 000000 BUCHANSVALE 61 IQ 61 2 -2/61 GENERAL NICE SA -MANGANESE PTY LTD BOONS 570 8142 MPP 0 Manganese Mine & Agricultural 2123 0000 00000002 0000 0001 000000 BUCHANSVALE 61 IQ 61 2 -1(-/-2)61 GENERAL NICE SA -MANGANESE PTY LTD BOONS 113 0000 MINING 350 000 Mine- Ref : -2/61 M00001 2123 0000 00000002 0000 0002 000000 BUCHANSVALE 61 IQ 61 2 -2(-/-2)61 GENERAL NICE SA -MANGANESE PTY LTD BOONS 457 8142 AGRICULTURAL 3 650 000 Agricultural - Ref : -2/61 M00002 2124 0000 00000000
    [Show full text]
  • Social Assistance in South Africa: Its Potential Impact on Poverty
    Social assistance in South Africa: Its potential impact on poverty. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Development Studies at the Institute for Social Development, University of the Western Cape Supervisors: Prof. P. le Roux and Prof. R. Botman (Full text version but printed in smaller fonts) written by: Claudia Haarmann e-mail: [email protected] date: 30.08.2000 Acknowledgments II Acknowledgments I would like to use this opportunity to thank my promoters Pieter le Roux and Russel Botman for their extraordinary help, support and encouraging friendship during the whole process of this research. Many thanks to COSATU for initiating this research and for the debate about a comprehensive social security system in South Africa. Special thanks to the members of the reference group for their com- mitment: Oupa Bodibe, Kenneth Creamer, Neil Coleman, Sandy Liebenberg, Neva Makgetla, Ravi Naidoo, Viviene Taylor and Eddie Webster. The discussions, inputs and invaluable comments at the workshops were key to the success of this project. Thanks to Conrad Barberton, Jacqui Boulle, Kenneth Creamer, Tania Flood, Ute and Hanns Hedrich- Lessing, Sandy Liebenberg, Johann Magerman, and Alison Tilley. First of all for their very special friendship, but also for many critical discussions on the topic which were so essential for the research. Thanks to Murray Leibbrandt and James Midgley for making time to discuss the research and for their highly appreciated comments. To the chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Welfare, Cassim Saloojee: Thanks for the friend- ship, trust and encouragement throughout the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of South Africa
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, REPORT OF THE COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO SOUTH AFRICAN COUNCIL OF CHURCHES TO THE STATE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, MR M VILJOEN May it please you: We, the undersigned, who were appointed under your hand as Chairman and members of the Commission, C.F. Elff Chairman Member Member /P. Oosthuiz F.G. Barr'e S.A. Patterson have the honour to report as follows:- Member Member TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Paragraph PART I INTRODUCTION Appointment, terms of reference and composition 1 1 Background to the appointment of the Commission 1 2 Appointments 13 3 Modus Operandi 14 4 Scheme of the Report 21 5 Acknowledgements 25 6 PART II CHAPTER 1 THE CONSTITUTIONAL AIMS AND STRUCTURES OF THE SACC AND ITS PRINCIPAL PROGRAMMES Nature of the SACC 26 1.1 Aims 26 1.2 Organisation of the SACC 27 1.3 SACC Office-bearers 29 1.4 Membership 29 1.5 Key officials of the SACC 30 1.6 Departmental structures 31 1.7 Church and Mission 34 1.8 Development and Service 37 1.9 Justice and Society 40 1.10 CHAPTER 2 THE INCEPTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN COUNCIL OF CHURCHES Introductory 55 2.1 The General Missionary Conference 56 2.2 Ecumenism 58 2.5 Cottesloe Consultation 59 2.6 "A Message to the People" 60 2.7 SPROCAS 61 2.8 CHAPTER 2 (cont.) Growing Black participation 65 2.9 The Programme to Combat Racism (PCR) 66 2.10 The Rees era 70 2.11 Relations between the SACC and SPROCAS 73 2.14 Factors affecting change 74 2.15 Establishment of the Division of Justice and Reconciliation 75 2.16 Establishment of Division of Theological Training 76 2.17 Christian Institute 77 2.18 The Wilgespruit Episode 81 2.19 Violence and Non-Violence 82 2.20 Black Consciousness 83 2.21 Hammanskraal 1974 84 2.23 SACC and the Dutch Reformed Churches 86 2.24 The first socio-political blueprint 87 2.25 The problem of limited support 88 2.26 Dr W.
    [Show full text]
  • Final IDP Doc. 2018-19 FINAL
    JB Marks Local MUNICIPALITY FINAL INTEGRATED PLAN 2018-2019 FINAL INTERGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE JB Marks Local MUNICIPALITY Complied in terms of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act ,2000( Act 32 of 2000) Integrated Development Plan is a process by which municipalities prepare a Five(5) Year Strategic Development Plan, which gets reviewed annually. It serves as a strategic instrument which guides planning, service delivery, infrastructure development and investment TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR ............................................................................. i OVERVIEW BY THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER ....................................................................... iii SECTION A POLICY AND LEGISLATION 1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 2. Policy And Legislative Mandate ...................................................................... 2 2.1 The Constitution ........................................................................................... 2 2.3 The Municipal Systems Act ............................................................................ 2 2.4 The Municipal Powers and Functions ............................................................. 3 2.5 The National Development Plan ..................................................................... 5 2.6 The National Government’s Outcome Approach ............................................. 5 2.7 The Back to Basic..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North West Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed
    # # !C # # ### !C^# !.!C# # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C!C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # #!C# # # # !C# ^ # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # #!C # # # # # !C # #^ # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # # ## !C # # # # # # # !C# ## # # #!C # !C # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C # # ## # # # !C # # # # # # # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # !C# !C # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # !C #!C# # # # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # !C# ## # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # !C # #!C # # #!C # # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # !C## # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # ## ## # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C ## # # # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # !C # # !C # #!C # # # # # #!C # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # ### !C # # # # !C !C# # ## # # # ## !C !C #!. # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C# # # # ## # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### #^ # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # ^ !C# # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # !C ## !C## # # # # ## # !C # ## !C# ## # # ## # !C # # ^ # !C ## # # # !C# ^# # # !C # # !C ## !C ### # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # !C## ## # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # !C # # # # # !C ^ # # ## # # # # !. # # # # # # !C # !C# ###
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Fees Mar 2020.Indd
    Toll Road Tariffs (effective from 1 March 2020) Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Managed bySANRAL Managed by N3 TOLL Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Managed by Bakwena Managed by TRAC Light vehicles 2 axle heavy 3 & 4 axle heavy More than 4 axle Light vehicles 2 axle heavy 3 & 4 axle heavy More than 4 axle PLAZA Telephone PLAZA Telephone vehicle vehicle heavy vehicle vehicle vehicle heavy vehicle N1: Beit Bridge – Pretoria (Great North Road) Beit Bridge N3: Heidelberg – Pietermaritzburg Heidelberg BAOBAB Main line 015 534 1322 R47,00 R128,00 R176,00 R211,00 Musina DE HOEK Main line R51,00 R80,00 R121,00 R175,00 DE HOEK CAPRICORN Main line 015 527 0160 R48,50 R133,00 R155,00 R195,00 WILGE Main line R71,00 R122,00 R163,00 R231,00 BAOBAB Tugela East Ramp R47,00 R78,00 R116,00 R160,00 Villiers Sebetiela Ramp 015 491 4783 R18,50 R35,00 R44,00 R58,00 WILGE NYL Main line 015 491 4783 R60,50 R113,00 R137,00 R183,00 Louis Trichardt TUGELA Main line R76,00 R125,00 R197,00 R273,00 Bergville Ramp R23,00 R27,00 R49,00 R76,00 Warden Ramp R18,50 R35,00 R41,00 R53,00 CAPRICORN Treverton Ramp R16,00 R39,00 R55,00 R74,00 TUGELA KRANSKOP Main line 014 717 5396 R46,50 R119,00 R159,00 R195,00 Polokwane MOOI Main line R53,00 R130,00 R182,00 R247,00 Frere Ramp R13,00 R35,00 R41,00 R61,00 NYL S ramp R37,00 R91,00 R128,00 R173,00 Maubane Ramp R25,00 R67,00 R74,00 R86,00 MOOI Naboomspruit N ramp R16,00 R39,00 R55,00 R74,00 CAROUSEL Main line R58,00 R155,00 R171,00 R198,00 Total cost (main line plazas) R251,00 R457,00 R663,00 R926,00 Cedara KRANSKOP Hammanskraal
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Tariffs 2021
    TOLL TARIFFS 2021 EFFECTIVE FROM 1 MARCH 2021 TOLL TARIFFS AND DISCOUNTS APPLICABLE TO THE CONVENTIONAL TOLL PLAZA, EFFECTIVE 01 MARCH 2021 Do note that this booklet is an explanatory document and does not replace the Government Gazette No. 44145, No. 44146, No. 44147, No. 44148 and No. 44149 on adjusted toll tariffs as published on 11 February 2021. PLAZA CLASS 1 CLASS 2 CLASS 3 CLASS 4 N1 HUGUENOT Mainline R42.50 R118.00 R185.00 R300.00 VAAL Mainline R71.50 R135.00 R162.00 R216.00 GRASMERE Mainline R21.50 R64.00 R75.00 R99.00 Ramp (N) R11.00 R32.00 R38.00 R49.00 Ramp (S) R11.00 R32.00 R38.00 R49.00 VERKEERDEVLEI Mainline R61.50 R123.00 R185.00 R260.00 STORMVOËL Ramp R10.00 R25.00 R29.00 R35.00 ZAMBESI Ramp R12.00 R30.00 R35.00 R42.00 PUMULANI Mainline R13.00 R32.00 R37.00 R45.00 WALLMANSTHAL Ramp R6.00 R15.00 R18.00 R20.50 MURRAYHILL Ramp R12.00 R30.00 R36.00 R41.00 HAMMANSKRAAL Ramp R28.00 R95.00 R103.00 R119.00 CAROUSEL Mainline R60.00 R160.00 R177.00 R204.00 MAUBANE Ramp R26.00 R69.00 R77.00 R89.00 KRANSKOP Mainline R48.50 R123.00 R165.00 R202.00 Ramp R13.50 R36.00 R42.00 R63.00 NYL Mainline R62.50 R117.00 R141.00 R189.00 Ramp R19.50 R36.00 R42.00 R54.00 SEBETIELA Ramp R19.50 R36.00 R45.00 R60.00 BAOBAB Mainline R48.50 R132.00 R181.00 R218.00 CAPRICORN Mainline R50.00 R137.00 R161.00 R201.00 R30 BRANDFORT Mainline R49.00 R98.00 R148.00 R208.00 N2 TSITSIKAMMA Mainline /Ramp R57.00 R144.00 R343.00 R486.00 IZOTSHA Ramp R10.00 R18.00 R24.00 R42.00 ORIBI Mainline R32.00 R57.00 R78.00 R127.00 Ramp (S) R14.50 R27.00 R36.00 R57.00 Ramp (N)
    [Show full text]
  • South African Numbered Route Description and Destination Analysis
    NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT RDDA SOUTH AFRICAN NUMBERED ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND DESTINATION ANALYSIS MAY 2012 Prepared by: TITLE SOUTH AFRICAN NUMBERED ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND DESTINATION ANALYSIS ISBN STATUS DOT FILE DATE 2012 UPDATE May 2012 COMMISSIONED BY: National Department of Transport COTO Private Bag x193 Roads Coordinating Body PRETORIA SA Route Numbering and Road Traffic 0001 Signs Committee SOUTH AFRICA CARRIED OUT BY: TTT Africa Author: Mr John Falkner P O Box 1109 Project Director: Dr John Sampson SUNNINGHILL Specialist Support: Mr David Bain 2157 STEERING COMMITTEE: Mr Prasanth Mohan Mr Vishay Hariram Ms Leslie Johnson Mr Schalk Carstens Mr Nkululeko Vezi Mr Garth Elliot Mr Msondezi Futshane Mr Willem Badenhorst Mr Rodney Offord Mr Jaco Cronje Mr Wlodek Gorny Mr Richard Rikhotso Mr Andre Rautenbach Mr Frank Lambert [i] CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... xi 2. TERMINOLOGY .......................................................................................................................... xi 3. HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT .......................................................................................... xii ROUTE DESCRIPTION – NATIONAL ROUTES NATIONAL ROUTE N1 .............................................................................................................................. 1 NATIONAL ROUTE N2 .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Releases Cycle 2 2020/21Funding Approvals. the National Film and Video Foundatio
    The National Film and Video Foundation (NFVF) releases Cycle 2 2020/21funding approvals. The National Film and Video Foundation (NFVF), is pleased to announce the following funding approvals for funding Cycle 2 FY 2020/21 NON-FICTION PROJECTS Development – Documentaries Project Name Applicants Name Production Company Amount Allocated Mandela Man of Peace Xoliswa Sithole N/A R180 000.00 SHIFTY - House on Fire Joëlle Chesselet Valley Studio cc R150 000.00 The Furiosus Liza Jane key Key Films cc R146 100.00 Accused Boipelo Masilabele Lerato Lihle (Pty) Ltd R155 000.00 Chagos Jacintha Timothy Arclight Distributors (Pty) R180 000.00 Ltd t/a Arclight Productions (Pty) Ltd Classified As Missing Lungile Mapukata Playful Native Studios R150 000.00 Pop Goes Freedom Vusi Zion Kaimal Pictures R180 000.00 Stripped Lee McCabe Kaizen 1 Pictures R180 000.00 Thabantšo Dithapelo Segodi YaDithapelo PTY LTD R180 000.00 The Home Stretch Nqaba Ngoyi Fort Films R180 000.00 The Unchosen World Danile Mohlamme Masbonisanenisonke R180 000.00 Trading and Projects 27C Production – Documentaries Project Name Applicants Name Production Company Amount Allocated A Gift from the Dying Anita Khanna Uhuru Productions R700 000.00 African Moot Shameela Seedat Undercurrent Film and R500 000.00 Television Banned: Joe Bullet Naledi Nonofo Trial by Media Films R500 000.00 Bogacwi Black Women and Sex Godisamang Khunou Mogale Pictures R500 000.00 Death at the Airport Markus Davies Hipster Media (Pty) Ltd R500 000.00 Downtown Studios Nhlanhla Ndaba Doti Productions R500 000.00 Iilifa
    [Show full text]