A <I>COX2</I> Molecular Phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A <I>COX2</I> Molecular Phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 2000 A COX2 Molecular Phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes Deborah S.S. Hudspeth Northern Illinos University Steven A. Nadler University of California - Davis, [email protected] Michael E.S. Hudspeth Northern Illinois University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Parasitology Commons Hudspeth, Deborah S.S.; Nadler, Steven A.; and Hudspeth, Michael E.S., "A COX2 Molecular Phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes" (2000). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 743. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/743 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Copyright 2000, Mycological Society of America. Used by permission. Mycologia, 92(4), 2000, pp. 674-684. ( 2000 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 A COX2 molecular phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes Deborah S. S. Hudspeth reflected by the inclusion of the autotrophic heter- Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois okont chromophytic algae (chlorophylls a and c); the University,DeKalb, Illinois 60115 heterotrophic unicellular slopalinids (Proteromonas; et al bicosoecids et al Steven A. Nadler Leipe 1996), (Cafeteria; Leipe 1994) and Developayella (Leipe et al 1996); and ad- Department of University of California, Nematology, ditional heterotrophic fungus-like heterokont groups Davis, California 95616 such as the thraustochytrids, labyrinthulids and hy- Michael E. S. Hudspeth' phochytriomycetes. Despite the apparent extreme di- Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois versity of its members the monophyly of the strami- University,DeKalb, Illinois 60115 nipiles has been strongly supported by several molec- ular systematic studies using data derived from small subunit r-RNA (SSURNA) and/or large subunit r- Abstract: The evolutionary history of the mitochon- RNA (e.g., Forster et al 1990, Leipe et al 1994, Van drial COX2 locus has been used to infer the phylo- de Peer et al 1996, Van der Auwera et al 1995) and genetic relationships among 15 peronosporomycete actin (Bhattacharya et al 1991, Bhattacharya and and a hyphochytriomycete species. This molecular Ehlting 1995) gene sequences. phylogenetic analysis at both the ordinal and generic The Peronosporomycetes are a ubiquitous group levels provides strong evidence for the recognition of of over 65 recognized genera (500-800 described the Saprolegniomycetidae and the Peronosporomy- species) with representatives found in most moist cetidae as natural and for the groups, monophyly of habitats (Dick 1990, 1995). The primary economic the Saprolegniales, Leptomitales and Pythiales. A impact of the Peronosporomycetes results from the three amino acid event insertion/deletion (indel) phytopathogenic genera, which include as hosts a has been identified as a for putative synapomorphy wide variety of leguminous and cereal crops, and for- the of 12 mor- Saprolegniales. Parsimony mapping est and rosaceous fruit trees. As the causative agents and biochemical characters on the COX2 phological of downy mildews, white rusts, and a variety of root molecular yields an hypothesis for peron- phylogeny rots and late blights they are a significant detriment osporomycete ancestral states and shared-derived fea- to agriculture. Similarly, infection of roe, fingerlings, tures. or freshwater and marine crustaceans and molluscans Key Words: Achlya, Aphanomyces, Apodachlya, cy- is of increasing concern to the rapidly expanding tochrome c oxidase, Dictyuchus, Hyphochytrium,La- field of aquaculture. Yet despite their economic im- genidium, Leptolegnia, Leptomitus, Oomycetes, Peron- pact, no formal cladistic analysis involving more than ophythora, Peronosporomycetidae, Phytophthora, Plec- a few peronosporomycetes is available, and the evo- tospira, Pythiopsis, Pythium, Saprolegnia, Saprolegni- the diverse Thraustotheca lutionary relationships among genera omycetidae, within the class remain unresolved. Over the last 25 yr the major taxa of the Peronos- poromycetes have undergone significant revision. INTRODUCTION The most traditional organization placed the taxa in four orders: the The Peronosporomycetes, traditionally referred to as major Saprolegniales (Dick 1973a), the the oomycetes, are a class of fungus-like heterotrophs Leptomitales (Dick 1973b), Lagenidiales and the placed in the Kingdom Straminipila (for initial as- (Sparrow 1973), Peronosporales (Water- house Several reassessments of semblage see Patterson 1989). The diversity of this 1973). major peron- Kingdom, whose sole synapomorphy is the appear- osporomycete systematics followed (e.g., Cavalier- ance of tripartite tubular hairs (stramenopiles) at Smith 1981, 1986, 1987, Beakes 1987) with the most some point during the life cycle of its members, is detailed reorganizations proposed by Dick et al (1984) and Dick (1990, 1995). In generating the Accepted for publication January 13, 2000. most recent of these taxonomic revisions Dick (1995) 1 Email: [email protected] has provided a testable set of relationships. Based pri- 674 HUDSPETHET AL: PERONOSPOROMYCETE PHYLOGENY 675 marily on overall similarities of morphological char- rather than eufungal mitochondrial polypeptides. acters, three subclasses (Peronosporomycetidae, Sap- More recently Paquin et al (1995) and Chesnick et rolegniomycetidae, and Rhipidiomycetidae) were al (1996) used P infestans amino acid data (NDH5 erected with requisite subdivision and redistribution and NDH4L) to infer a noneufungal straminipilous of existing orders. relationship for the Peronosporomycetes. Given the paucity of morphological and biochem- In this study we have constructed an hypothesis for ical data for inferring peronosporomycete relation- the evolutionary history of the peronosporomycete ships, molecular-based approaches are very promis- mitochondrial locus (COX2) encoding subunit 2 ing for understanding peronosporomycete phyloge- (COII) of cytochrome c oxidase. By extension, DNA ny. Unfortunately, published molecular phylogenetic and deduced amino acid sequence data from 15 per- studies have typically included only one to five gen- onosporomycete taxa and a hyphochytriomycete era, and were primarily intended to assess the rela- have been used to infer the phylogenetic relation- tionships of peronosporomycetes to other major eu- ships among peronosporomycete species. Specifically, karyotic groups. One of those studies (Forster et al we ask if there is molecular support for the recogni- 1990) used three SSURNA sequences to represent tion of the Saprolegniomycetidae and the Peronos- the Peronosporomycetidae and Saprolegniomyceti- poromycetidae as natural groups; and, whether there dae; these authors noted that the three sequences is support for the placement of the Leptomitales were very similar to each other and suggested that within the Saprolegniomycetidae as recently pro- less conserved DNA sequences may be needed. Sub- posed (Dick 1995). The analyses presented here rep- sequently, Lee and Taylor (1992) inferred relation- resent the first rigorous cladistic analysis of this eco- ships among several Phytophthoraspecies using more nomically important, but greatly understudied class variable rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. of the Straminipila. Neither of these studies, however, was intended to infer a peronosporomycete phylogeny per se, nor has MATERIALSAND METHODS a formal cladistic analysis of this group been pub- lished to date. Based on these reports and other stud- Strains and media.-Straminipile taxa used in this study ies where SSURNA data were sometimes unable to were obtained from the followingsources (ATCCcatalogue resolve closely related taxa (e.g., Nadler and Hud- numbersin parentheses):Achlya ambisexualis E87 (11400), speth 1998), we examined alternative loci prior to A. Barksdale,New YorkBotanical Garden, New York,New initiating our molecular phylogenetic analysis of the York;Aphanomyces euteiches A466 S.E. Holub, Universityof Wisconsin,Madison, lacteus Peronosporomycetes. Wisconsin;Leptomitus (38076), J. Aronson,Arizona State University,Tempe, Arizona;Pyth- Several factors suggested that the use of mtDNA ium ultimum67-1 (32939),J.G. Hancock,University of Cal- would be in a helpful establishing peronosporomy- ifornia, Berkeley,California; Saprolegnia ferax (36051), I.B. cete Foremost these the ex- phylogeny. among were: Heath, YorkUniversity, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Dictyu- tensive physical (Hudspeth et al 1983, Klimczak and chus sterilis(44891), Hyphochytriumcatenoides (18719), La- Prell 1984, McNabb et al 1987, McNabb and Klassen genidiumgiganteum (36492), Leptolegniacaudata (48818), 1988, Shumard-Hudspeth and Hudspeth 1990) and Peronophythoralitchii (28739), Plectospira myriandra genic (Shumard et al 1986, Shumard-Hudspeth and (64139), Pythiopsiscymosa (26880), Thraustothecaclavata Hudspeth 1990, Hudspeth 1992, Hudspeth and Hud- (34112) were all purchaseddirectly from ATCC,Manassas, speth 1996) characterizations of a wide variety of per- Virginia.Apodachlya pyrifera
Recommended publications
  • Mass Flow in Hyphae of the Oomycete Achlya Bisexualis
    Mass flow in hyphae of the oomycete Achlya bisexualis A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Cellular and Molecular Biology in the University of Canterbury by Mona Bidanjiri University of Canterbury 2018 Abstract Oomycetes and fungi grow in a polarized manner through the process of tip growth. This is a complex process, involving extension at the apex of the cell and the movement of the cytoplasm forward, as the tip extends. The mechanisms that underlie this growth are not clearly understood, but it is thought that the process is driven by the tip yielding to turgor pressure. Mass flow, the process where bulk flow of material occurs down a pressure gradient, may play a role in tip growth moving the cytoplasm forward. This has previously been demonstrated in mycelia of the oomycete Achlya bisexualis and in single hypha of the fungus Neurospora crassa. Microinjected silicone oil droplets were observed to move in the predicted direction after the establishment of an imposed pressure gradient. In order to test for mass flow in a single hypha of A. bisexualis the work in this thesis describes the microinjection of silicone oil droplets into hyphae. Pressure gradients were imposed by the addition of hyperosmotic and hypoosmotic solutions to the hyphae. In majority of experiments, after both hypo- and hyperosmotic treatments, the oil droplets moved down the imposed gradient in the predicted direction. This supports the existence of mass flow in single hypha of A. bisexualis. The Hagen-Poiseuille equation was used to calculate the theoretical rate of mass flow occurring within the hypha and this was compared to observed rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Identification of Fungi
    Molecular Identification of Fungi Youssuf Gherbawy l Kerstin Voigt Editors Molecular Identification of Fungi Editors Prof. Dr. Youssuf Gherbawy Dr. Kerstin Voigt South Valley University University of Jena Faculty of Science School of Biology and Pharmacy Department of Botany Institute of Microbiology 83523 Qena, Egypt Neugasse 25 [email protected] 07743 Jena, Germany [email protected] ISBN 978-3-642-05041-1 e-ISBN 978-3-642-05042-8 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-05042-8 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2009938949 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: WMXDesign GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany, kindly supported by ‘leopardy.com’ Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Dedicated to Prof. Lajos Ferenczy (1930–2004) microbiologist, mycologist and member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, one of the most outstanding Hungarian biologists of the twentieth century Preface Fungi comprise a vast variety of microorganisms and are numerically among the most abundant eukaryotes on Earth’s biosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy and Biology of Phytophthora and Pythium
    Journal of Bacteriology & Mycology: Open Access Review Article Open Access The taxonomy and biology of Phytophthora and Pythium Abstract Volume 6 Issue 1 - 2018 The genera Phytophthora and Pythium include many economically important species Hon H Ho which have been placed in Kingdom Chromista or Kingdom Straminipila, distinct from Department of Biology, State University of New York, USA Kingdom Fungi. Their taxonomic problems, basic biology and economic importance have been reviewed. Morphologically, both genera are very similar in having coenocytic, hyaline Correspondence: Hon H Ho, Professor of Biology, State and freely branching mycelia, oogonia with usually single oospores but the definitive University of New York, New Paltz, NY 12561, USA, differentiation between them lies in the mode of zoospore differentiation and discharge. Email [email protected] In Phytophthora, the zoospores are differentiated within the sporangium proper and when mature, released in an evanescent vesicle at the sporangial apex, whereas in Pythium, the Received: January 23, 2018 | Published: February 12, 2018 protoplast of a sporangium is transferred usually through an exit tube to a thin vesicle outside the sporangium where zoospores are differentiated and released upon the rupture of the vesicle. Many species of Phytophthora are destructive pathogens of especially dicotyledonous woody trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants whereas Pythium species attacked primarily monocotyledonous herbaceous plants, whereas some cause diseases in fishes, red algae and mammals including humans. However, several mycoparasitic and entomopathogenic species of Pythium have been utilized respectively, to successfully control other plant pathogenic fungi and harmful insects including mosquitoes while the others utilized to produce valuable chemicals for pharmacy and food industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Intracellular Eukaryotic Pathogens in Brown Macroalgae in the Eastern Mediterranean, Including LSU Rrna Data for the Oomycete Eurychasma Dicksonii
    Vol. 104: 1–11, 2013 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published April 29 doi: 10.3354/dao02583 Dis Aquat Org Intracellular eukaryotic pathogens in brown macroalgae in the Eastern Mediterranean, including LSU rRNA data for the oomycete Eurychasma dicksonii Martina Strittmatter1,2,6, Claire M. M. Gachon1, Dieter G. Müller3, Julia Kleinteich3, Svenja Heesch1,7, Amerssa Tsirigoti4, Christos Katsaros4, Maria Kostopoulou2, Frithjof C. Küpper1,5,* 1Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK 2University of the Aegean, Department of Marine Sciences, University Hill, 81 100 Mytilene, Greece 3Universität Konstanz, FB Biologie, 78457 Konstanz, Germany 4University of Athens, Faculty of Biology, Athens 157 84, Greece 5Oceanlab, University of Aberdeen, Main Street, Newburgh AB41 6AA, UK 6Present address: CNRS and UPMC University Paris 06, The Marine Plants and Biomolecules Laboratory, UMR 7139, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, CS 90074, 29688 Roscoff Cedex, France 7Present address: Irish Seaweed Research Group, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland ABSTRACT: For the Mediterranean Sea, and indeed most of the world’s oceans, the biodiversity and biogeography of eukaryotic pathogens infecting marine macroalgae remains poorly known, yet their ecological impact is probably significant. Based on 2 sampling campaigns on the Greek island of Lesvos in 2009 and 1 in northern Greece in 2012, this study provides first records of 3 intracellular eukaryotic pathogens infecting filamentous brown algae at these locations: Eury - chas ma dicksonii, Anisolpidium sphacellarum, and A. ectocarpii. Field and microscopic observa- tions of the 3 pathogens are complemented by the first E. dicksonii large subunit ribosomal RNA (LSU rRNA) gene sequence analyses of isolates from Lesvos and other parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Sirolpidium Bryopsidis</I>, a Parasite of Green Algae, Is Probably
    VOLUME 7 JUNE 2021 Fungal Systematics and Evolution PAGES 223–231 doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2021.07.11 Sirolpidium bryopsidis, a parasite of green algae, is probably conspecific with Pontisma lagenidioides, a parasite of red algae A.T. Buaya1, B. Scholz2, M. Thines1,3,4* 1Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Center, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 2BioPol ehf, Marine Biotechnology, Einbúastig 2, 545 Skagaströnd, Iceland 3Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Department of Biological Sciences, Institute of Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Max-von-Laue Str. 13, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 4LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics, Georg-Voigt-Str. 14-16, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany *Corresponding author: [email protected] Key words: Abstract: The genus Sirolpidium (Sirolpidiaceae) of the Oomycota includes several species of holocarpic obligate aquatic chlorophyte algae parasites. These organisms are widely occurring in marine and freshwater habitats, mostly infecting filamentous green early-diverging algae. Presently, all species are only known from their morphology and descriptive life cycle traits. None of the seven new taxa species classified in Sirolpidium, including the type species, S. bryopsidis, has been rediscovered and studied for their Oomycota molecular phylogeny, so far. Originally, the genus was established to accommodate all parasites of filamentous marine Petersenia green algae. In the past few decades, however, Sirolpidium has undergone multiple taxonomic revisions and several species phylogeny parasitic in other host groups were added to the genus. While the phylogeny of the marine rhodophyte- and phaeophyte- Pontismataceae infecting genera Pontisma and Eurychasma, respectively, has only been resolved recently, the taxonomic placement Sirolpidiaceae of the chlorophyte-infecting genus Sirolpidium remained unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Sampling of Ribosomally Active Protistan Diversity in Sediment-Surface Layers Identifies Putative Players in the Marine Carbon Sink
    The ISME Journal (2020) 14:984–998 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0581-y ARTICLE Controlled sampling of ribosomally active protistan diversity in sediment-surface layers identifies putative players in the marine carbon sink 1,2 1 1 3 3 Raquel Rodríguez-Martínez ● Guy Leonard ● David S. Milner ● Sebastian Sudek ● Mike Conway ● 1 1 4,5 6 7 Karen Moore ● Theresa Hudson ● Frédéric Mahé ● Patrick J. Keeling ● Alyson E. Santoro ● 3,8 1,9 Alexandra Z. Worden ● Thomas A. Richards Received: 6 October 2019 / Revised: 4 December 2019 / Accepted: 17 December 2019 / Published online: 9 January 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract Marine sediments are one of the largest carbon reservoir on Earth, yet the microbial communities, especially the eukaryotes, that drive these ecosystems are poorly characterised. Here, we report implementation of a sampling system that enables injection of reagents into sediments at depth, allowing for preservation of RNA in situ. Using the RNA templates recovered, we investigate the ‘ribosomally active’ eukaryotic diversity present in sediments close to the water/sediment interface. We 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: demonstrate that in situ preservation leads to recovery of a significantly altered community profile. Using SSU rRNA amplicon sequencing, we investigated the community structure in these environments, demonstrating a wide diversity and high relative abundance of stramenopiles and alveolates, specifically: Bacillariophyta (diatoms), labyrinthulomycetes and ciliates. The identification of abundant diatom rRNA molecules is consistent with microscopy-based studies, but demonstrates that these algae can also be exported to the sediment as active cells as opposed to dead forms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classification of Lower Organisms
    The Classification of Lower Organisms Ernst Hkinrich Haickei, in 1874 From Rolschc (1906). By permission of Macrae Smith Company. C f3 The Classification of LOWER ORGANISMS By HERBERT FAULKNER COPELAND \ PACIFIC ^.,^,kfi^..^ BOOKS PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA Copyright 1956 by Herbert F. Copeland Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 56-7944 Published by PACIFIC BOOKS Palo Alto, California Printed and bound in the United States of America CONTENTS Chapter Page I. Introduction 1 II. An Essay on Nomenclature 6 III. Kingdom Mychota 12 Phylum Archezoa 17 Class 1. Schizophyta 18 Order 1. Schizosporea 18 Order 2. Actinomycetalea 24 Order 3. Caulobacterialea 25 Class 2. Myxoschizomycetes 27 Order 1. Myxobactralea 27 Order 2. Spirochaetalea 28 Class 3. Archiplastidea 29 Order 1. Rhodobacteria 31 Order 2. Sphaerotilalea 33 Order 3. Coccogonea 33 Order 4. Gloiophycea 33 IV. Kingdom Protoctista 37 V. Phylum Rhodophyta 40 Class 1. Bangialea 41 Order Bangiacea 41 Class 2. Heterocarpea 44 Order 1. Cryptospermea 47 Order 2. Sphaerococcoidea 47 Order 3. Gelidialea 49 Order 4. Furccllariea 50 Order 5. Coeloblastea 51 Order 6. Floridea 51 VI. Phylum Phaeophyta 53 Class 1. Heterokonta 55 Order 1. Ochromonadalea 57 Order 2. Silicoflagellata 61 Order 3. Vaucheriacea 63 Order 4. Choanoflagellata 67 Order 5. Hyphochytrialea 69 Class 2. Bacillariacea 69 Order 1. Disciformia 73 Order 2. Diatomea 74 Class 3. Oomycetes 76 Order 1. Saprolegnina 77 Order 2. Peronosporina 80 Order 3. Lagenidialea 81 Class 4. Melanophycea 82 Order 1 . Phaeozoosporea 86 Order 2. Sphacelarialea 86 Order 3. Dictyotea 86 Order 4. Sporochnoidea 87 V ly Chapter Page Orders. Cutlerialea 88 Order 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan
    CONNECTICUT AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Connecticut Aquatic Nuisance Species Working Group TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 3 Acknowledgements 5 Executive Summary 6 1. INTRODUCTION 10 1.1. Scope of the ANS Problem in Connecticut 10 1.2. Relationship with other ANS Plans 10 1.3. The Development of the CT ANS Plan (Process and Participants) 11 1.3.1. The CT ANS Sub-Committees 11 1.3.2. Scientific Review Process 12 1.3.3. Public Review Process 12 1.3.4. Agency Review Process 12 2. PROBLEM DEFINITION AND RANKING 13 2.1. History and Biogeography of ANS in CT 13 2.2. Current and Potential Impacts of ANS in CT 15 2.2.1. Economic Impacts 16 2.2.2. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Impacts 19 2.3. Priority Aquatic Nuisance Species 19 2.3.1. Established ANS Priority Species or Species Groups 21 2.3.2. Potentially Threatening ANS Priority Species or Species Groups 23 2.4. Priority Vectors 23 2.5. Priorities for Action 23 3. EXISTING AUTHORITIES AND PROGRAMS 30 3.1. International Authorities and Programs 30 3.2. Federal Authorities and Programs 31 3.3. Regional Authorities and Programs 37 3.4. State Authorities and Programs 39 3.5. Local Authorities and Programs 45 4. GOALS 47 3 5. OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS 48 6. IMPLEMENTATION TABLE 72 7. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION 80 Glossary* 81 Appendix A. Listings of Known Non-Native ANS and Potential ANS in Connecticut 83 Appendix B. Descriptions of Species Identified as ANS or Potential ANS 93 Appendix C.
    [Show full text]
  • CATALOG of SPECIES
    ARSARSARSARSARSARS ARSARS CollectionCollectionef ofof EntomopathogenicEntomopathogenic FungalFungal CulturesCultures CATALOG of SPECIES FULLY INDEXED [INCLUDES 9773 ISOLAtes] USDA-ARS Biological Integrated Pest Management Research Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health 538 Tower Road Ithaca, New York 14853-2901 28 July 2011 Search the ARSEF catalog online at http://www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=12125 ARSEF Collection Staff Richard A. Humber, Curator phone: [+1] 607-255-1276 fax: [+1] 607-255-1132 email: [email protected] Karen S. Hansen phone: [+1] 607-255-1274 fax: [+1] 607-255-1132 email: [email protected] Micheal M. Wheeler phone: [+1] 607-255-1274 fax: [+1] 607-255-1132 email: [email protected] USDA-ARS Biological IPM Research Unit Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health 538 Tower Road Ithaca, New York 14853-2901, USA IMPORTANT NOTE Recent phylogenetically based reclassifications of fungal pathogens of invertebrates Richard A. Humber Insect Mycologist and Curator, ARSEF UPDATED July 2011 Some seemingly dramatic and comparatively recent changes in the classification of a number of fungi may continue to cause confusion or a degree of discomfort to many of the clients of the cultures and informational resources provided by the ARSEF culture collection. This short treatment is an attempt to summarize some of these changes, the reasons for them, and to provide the essential references to the literature in which the changes are proposed. As the Curator of the ARSEF collection I wish to assure you that these changes are appropriate, progressive, and necessary to modernize and to stabilize the systematics of the fungal pathogens affecting insects and other invertebrates, and I urge you to adopt them into your own thinking, teaching, and publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Freshwater Crayfish Diseases and Commensal Organisms Brett .F Edgerton James Cook University, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Laboratory of Parasitology 3-2002 Synopsis of Freshwater Crayfish Diseases and Commensal Organisms Brett .F Edgerton James Cook University, [email protected] Louis H. Evans Curtin University of Technology Frances J. Stephens Curtin University of Technology Robin M. Overstreet Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Parasitology Commons Edgerton, Brett .;F Evans, Louis H.; Stephens, Frances J.; and Overstreet, Robin M., "Synopsis of Freshwater Crayfish Diseases and Commensal Organisms" (2002). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 884. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/884 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Aquaculture 206:1–2 (March 2002), pp. 57–135; doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00865-1 Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science. Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Deriva- tives License. Accepted October 18, 2001; published online November 30, 2001. Synopsis of Freshwater Crayfish Diseases and Commensal Organisms Brett F. Edgerton,1 Louis H. Evans,2 Frances J. Stephens,2 and Robin M. Overstreet3 1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Gene Phylogeny of Heterokonts
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Protist, Vol. 160, 191—204, May 2009 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 9 February 2009 ORIGINAL PAPER Seven Gene Phylogeny of Heterokonts Ingvild Riisberga,d,1, Russell J.S. Orrb,d,1, Ragnhild Klugeb,c,2, Kamran Shalchian-Tabrizid, Holly A. Bowerse, Vishwanath Patilb,c, Bente Edvardsena,d, and Kjetill S. Jakobsenb,d,3 aMarine Biology, Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway bCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES),Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway cDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, The Norwegian University of Life Sciences, N-1432, A˚ s, Norway dMicrobial Evolution Research Group (MERG), Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, NO-0316, Oslo, Norway eCenter of Marine Biotechnology, 701 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA Submitted May 23, 2008; Accepted November 15, 2008 Monitoring Editor: Mitchell L. Sogin Nucleotide ssu and lsu rDNA sequences of all major lineages of autotrophic (Ochrophyta) and heterotrophic (Bigyra and Pseudofungi) heterokonts were combined with amino acid sequences from four protein-coding genes (actin, b-tubulin, cox1 and hsp90) in a multigene approach for resolving the relationship between heterokont lineages. Applying these multigene data in Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses improved the heterokont tree compared to previous rDNA analyses by placing all plastid-lacking heterotrophic heterokonts sister to Ochrophyta with robust support, and divided the heterotrophic heterokonts into the previously recognized phyla, Bigyra and Pseudofungi. Our trees identified the heterotrophic heterokonts Bicosoecida, Blastocystis and Labyrinthulida (Bigyra) as the earliest diverging lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Program
    Oomycete Molecular Genetics Network Meeting March 10 to March 12 2013 Asilomar Conference Grounds Pacific Grove, CA Oomycete Molecular Genetics Network Meeting March 10 to March 12, 2013 Asilomar Conference Grounds Pacific Grove, CA The Oomycete Molecular Genetics Research Network was initially funded by an NSF Research Coordination Network grant in 2001. The purpose of our annual meeting is to promote communication and collaboration, and minimize duplication of effort within the worldwide Oomycete molecular genetics community. The oomycete molecular genetics community now numbers well over one hundred labs from across the world, and papers on oomycetes attract a readership that goes well beyond the community itself. The Oomycete Molecular Genetics Conference alternates between USA and Eurasia, and returns this year to Asilomar, California. This year’s meeting will cover some of the latest research on Effector Biology, Genomics and Oomycete evolution and population biology. With over 100 attendees expected, this meeting represents the largest network meeting held in the US. Committee Chairs John McDowell Mark Gijzen Associate Professor Research Scientist Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science Agriculture and Agri-food Canada Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 London ON, Canada NSV4T3 Meeting Logistics Facilities Coordinator Joel Shuman Paul Morris Project Manager Professor, Biological Sciences Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science Bowling Green State University Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA24061 Bowling Green, OH 43403 Cover: Confocal image of GFP-expressing Phytophthora sojae at 12h after inoculation of soybean hypocotyls. Image courtesy of Kai-Tao from the lab of Yuanchao Wang, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China. Meeting Sponsors This meeting is supported in part by NSF grant MCB-0639226 to Brett Tyler OMGN 2013 Program Location: Talks will be held at Kiln on Sunday Morning and at Fred Farr for all other sessions.
    [Show full text]