DOCSLIB.ORG

"Annual Report of the ,Department of Justice Asset Forfeiture Program O1991

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. Q U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General "Annual Report of the ,Department of Justice Asset Forfeiture Program o1991 oepartme°t ~ 0 g ~OfOrce~eO LO W" \ Annual Report .of the Department of Justice Asset Forfeiture Program NCJRS NOV ~.~ ~j ACQU~SI1T~O~S 156256 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this ~ material has been grantedb¥ FUD-IC Domain/OJP/Off. of the Attorney General/US Dept. of Justice to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the ~lf,owner. Prepared by the Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture Office of the Deputy Attorney General Fiscal Year 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Annual Report of the Department of Justice Forfeiture Program 1991 is dedicated to the memory of Drug Enforcement Administration Special Agent Eugene T. McCarthy who died in service to his country in the Persian Gulf War. Special Agent McCarthy flew surveillance missions over Peru for Operation Snowcap in our nation's war against drugs. O @ @ffite of the Attorneu General ~llashington, ~1.~. ~-0530 Q ,v,~jus~ ,~ FOREWORD To the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress Assembled: To tell the story of the Department of Justice Asset Forfeiture Program is to report not only its significant law enforcement impact but also the multitude of other benefits that flow to society when drug traffickers and criminals are stripped of their ill-gotten gains. The Asset Forfeiture Program is first and foremost a law enforcement program. Since Fiscal Year 1985 more than $2.4 billion in cash and property has been stripped from drug traffickers and other criminals. Most of these forfeiture proceeds have been reinvested in law enforcement. Over $830 million in forfeited cash and property has been shared with state and local law enforcement agencies Which participated in cases resulting in federal forfeitures. In Fiscal Year 1991 alone, $289 million was shared. Almost a half-billion dollars in forfeiture proceeds have been used to finance federal prison construction. Over $350 million has helped finance federal investigations and prosecutions. These successes are the result of unprece- dented law enforcement cooperation at all levels of government both domestically and abroad. Through asset forfeiture, we are able to give effect to the maxim: "crime does not pay." Forfeited property has not only been reinvested in law enforcement. The victims of financial institution fraud receive restitution from forfeited assets. The environmental hazards caused by clandestine drug laboratories have been removed. Forfeiture also benefits victims of crime as assets can be "frozen" before they can be dissipated. The Asset Forfeiture Program is a top priority of the Department of Justice and has my strong personal support. The success of the program comes from the hard work done on a day-to-day basis by dedicated investigators, prosecutors, and marshals across this nation. This year's Annual Report highlights their outstanding contributions. Respectfully submitted, William P. Barr Attorney General Table of Contents Executive Summary . .............. 1 Introduction: Fiscal Year 1991 Annual Report .5 Methodology . ............ 5 Statutory Reporting Requirement ......... ...... .................. 5 Chapter I The History Of Forfeiture ..................................... 7 Legal Standard for Seizure .................................. ...... 7 Criminal vs. Civil Forfeiture .... 7 Safeguards in the Process ........................ .. ...... .., ...... 8 Protections for Innocent Owners ............... ........ • ........... 8 Expedited Settlement Process for Mortgage Holders .... ............. 9 Forfeiture and the War Against Crime .......... ...: ................. 9 Chapter II Forfeiture Law ............. .............................................. 11 Significant Changes to Federal Forfeiture Authority ................. 11 Recent Legislative Changes to the Assets Forfeiture Fund ............ 12 Model Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act 12 Chapter III Program Improvements . ............ 15 The Executive office for Asset Forfeiture ................................ 15 Development of the Consolidated Asset Tracking System (CATS) ........... 16 Audits and Evaluations .............. ...... , ........................... 17 Quality Assurance Standards ..................................... 18 Oversight of the Program ........................................ 19 Policy and Procedure Improvements .............................. 20 Use of Contract Employees ................................ , ..... 20 Chapter IV Asset Forfeiture Program Components ...................................... 23 Drug Enforcement Administration ........................................ 24 Headquarters Enhancements ..................................... 24 Training ........ ....... ... ...... .... i. ....................... .. 24 Field Operations ............. .............................. .... 24 DEA Seizures .................................................. 25 Field Investigations . ... .............. .......................... 25 Operation Royal Flush ............................ • ...~ .......... 26 Clandestine Lab Sources and Hazardous Waste Disposal ...... ~ ...... 26 State and Local Cooperation and Equitable Sharing .... :. ............ 26 Federal Bureau of Investigation ......................................... 27 General Information .. i .... i ............... ... ................... 27 Headquarters Activities ............ ............................. 27 Training .................................. : .................... 27 Field Operations ................................................ 28 Field Investigations ..................... ........................ 28 FIRREA Investigations .......................................... 28 Narcotics Investigations ............... : .......................... 28 Gambling and Public Corruption ............................... ... 28 Illegal Toxic Waste .................................... .... : ...... 29 i Immigration and Nationalization Service .... ............................ 29 United State~ Attorneys 30 Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces ................. .. 30 : Law Enforcement Coordinating Committees ................ ....:... 31 U.S. Marshals Service... ........................... ...... i.... ......... 32 Sales of Forfeited Property ... ; ....... ......... , ...... i ......... ,. 34 Asset Forfeiture Office Criminal Division ..~ ... .... ...... .'.:. ...... .... 35 International Forfeiture Support ........ -.. •..' ....... ....... ........ 35 Training ..................................................... .. 35 ii Office of Justice Programs ...... ........................................ 36 Police Executive Research Forum .................................. 36 Model Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act ........................... 36 Postal Insp~ection Service ................ • ............... .. ~ ............ 37 Information Management.... ....................... ............. 37 Training .................... ~................................... 37 Significant Cases ................... ............................ 37 Cooperation with Other Departments . ... .......... ..... ........ ~. 38 Internal Revenue Service .... .. '. ............... ~i ........ ....... .... .. 39 Headquarters Field Operations. ........................ .......... 39 Seizures ...................... • ................................ 39 Training .. ............. • ....................................... 39 Significant Investigations .................... ..................... 39 The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco And Firearms ........................... 40 Implementing the Program.. ..................................... 40 U. S. Park Police ..................................................... .41 Chapter V International Cooperation ................................................. 43 Treaties and Agreements ... ...... • ..... ............... - ~. • - ..... 43 Approaches to International Forfeiture .'.. ..... ........ ....... .... 44 International Asset Sharing ...................................... 46 Personnel and Training ........................................ ,. 46 Future of the Program ........................................... 47 Chapter VI , Equitable Sharing .................... ........................... "...... ... 49 Report on the Equitable Sharing Program .......................... 50 Real Property Transfers ................... .... ................... 51 • .... I'U Chapter VII The Assets Forfeiture Fund ....................... ......................... 53 Special Forfeiture Fund ......................................... 57 Q Appendices Appendix A ............................ .59 Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund Statement of Income and Expenses Fiscal Year 1991 (October 1, 1990 through September 30, 1991) Financial Statement Fiscal Year 1991 Appendix B "'''''''''''"-"-....-....-.................................63 Properties on Hand as of September 30, 1991 with Net Equity at or Above $1,000,000.00 U.S. Marshals Service Appendix C ...... ..........
Recommended publications
  • Felix Issue 1131, 1999

    Felix Issue 1131, 1999

    24 May 1999 KEEP THE CAT FREE EST 1949 The Students' Newspaper at Imperial College Imperial Staff Will Strike Tomorrow Members of the Association of Uni• By Ed Sexton be given to student hardship funds at versity Teachers (AUT), which includes Imperial, an action which could be the majority of Imperial's academic later this term. Ms Laura Barker, IC's that strikers would merely "seek to per• seen as an attempt at compensation staff, are to strike tomorrow, Tuesday AUT president, hoped "that the stu• suade peacefully". for the disruption. 25 May. The strike is likely to effect lec• dents do not come in that day", as a The strike action has the support of It is unlikely that the strike on its tures and examinations, as well as dis• sign of support for the strikers, adding the National Union of Students (NUS), own will achieve the AUT's objectives. rupting other services throughout that she "will stand behind students as well as other unions representing Ms Barker agreed, describing it as "a college. The strike, which is the result who skip exams", suggesting the col• university staff. In a letter dated 10 demonstrative action - the start of a of an ongoing pay dispute, will only lege could successfully reschedule May from NUS President Andrew process". That "process" is likely to affect the South Kensington campus, them. David Hellard, ICU President, Pakes, to the AUT, he described the involve a four day boycott of exami• as clinical staff have received a differ• was more wary, suggesting that if stu• 3.5% salary increase that had been nation administration in June, which ent pay settlement to other acade• dents had exams or other essential offered to AUT members as "a derisory could further disrupt students' exams, mics.
  • New Mexico State. Poucedepartl11ent .. . an N Nair

    New Mexico State. Poucedepartl11ent .. . an N Nair

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ,,' ~ '..' (- .... New Mexico State. PoUceDepartl11ent .. - .. ' . An nnaiR eport19J 6 . " .'~ \" , ' ';- '. , '. r.;. ' NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE DISTRICTS Captain Frank Lucero Captain C. P.Anaya ' CommlUlder ~ District 01 Commander - District 07 P. O. Box, 1628 P. O. DrawerD Santa Fe, N. M. 87501 Esp:mola, N.M. 87532 827-2551 753-4277 Captain J. D. Mae.s Captain M. A. Matteson Command!:r • District 02 Commander - District' 08 P. O. Box 497 P .. O. Box 716 La$ Vegas, N. M. 87701 Alamogordo,N. M. 88310 425-6771 437-1313 Captain FIoyd Miles Captain A. C. Jones Commander -' District 03 Commander • District 09 P. O. Box 760 812 West 6th Street Roswell, N. M. 88201 Clovi~, N. M. $8101 622-7200 763-3426 Captain W. J. Kruse Captain R. J. McCool Commande~ ~ District 04 Commander - District 10 3000 E, University P.D. Box 1049 Las Cruces, N. M. 88001 Farmington, N. M. 87401 522-2222 n5-7547 Captain MelVin West CaptaIn S. Doitchinoff Commander - District 05 Commander • District 11 2501 . Carlisle .BlVd., N~ E. P. a.Box. 1455 Albuquerque, N. M. 87110 Socorro,. N. M. 87801 842-3082 835-0741 Captain M. L. Cordova Captain Otis A •.. Haley Commander - District 06 Commander- District 12 P. O. BoX 490 P. O. Box 566 Gnllup, N. M. 87301 Hobbs, N. M.88240 863-9353 392-5588 JAN 0 111978 GOVERNOR JERRY APODACA NEW MEXICO STATE POllCr; NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT ORGANllA1'lONAL CHART 1976 ANNUAL REPORT NEW Mr;XICO STATE'POLICE BOARD TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Dr.
  • HOW the MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY HOARDS MONEY, PERPETUATES ABUSE of SURVIVORS, and GAGS THEIR ADVOCATES Table of Contents

    HOW the MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY HOARDS MONEY, PERPETUATES ABUSE of SURVIVORS, and GAGS THEIR ADVOCATES Table of Contents

    HOW THE MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY HOARDS MONEY, PERPETUATES ABUSE of SURVIVORS, and GAGS THEIR ADVOCATES Table of Contents INTRODUCTION S&P NY PERSPECTIVES ON PROSECUTING OFFICES • Prosecutors Are Our Opponents, Not Our Allies • We Will Not Prosecute Our Way Out of Violence PROSECUTING OFFICES HOARD PUBLIC FUNDS AND SABOTAGE SURVIVOR SAFETY • How Prosecutors Accumulate Funds • Where Does This Money Go? • DA Funding Undermines Survivors’ Collective Safety: The Role of Mainstream Gender-based Violence Organizations • Prosecutor Allies: How Did the Anti-violence Movement Lose Its Way? • Relying on Criminalization and Prosection: Protecting White Women, Leaving other Survivors Behind • An Abuse of Discretion: How Prosecutors Criminalize Survivors Acknowledgements WHAT WE COULD EXPECT FROM THE CANDIDATES • Where Do the Candidates Stand on Funding? Deep appreciation for all of our comrades inside NY prisons and jails that • Criminalized Survivor Case Study: shape what we know about criminalization and prosecutors’ everyday Snapshot of the Tracy McCarter’s Story violence. We will continue to fight for your freedom and healing. Love and • Fool’s Gold: gratitude to Tracy McCarter and the #StandWithTracy defense team for District Attorney Candidates and Sex Crime Unit Reform allowing us to share her story. Thanks to Jett George for their beautiful (and swiftly produced!) illustrations and design. Forever gratitude to the abolitionist, Black feminist queer disabled organizers, and survivors before ACTION STEPS TO GET INVOLVED us that promised us that there is another way to bring healing and safety to our communities, without state violence. Introduction The Anti-Prosecution Working Group of Survived & Punished NY exists to Beyond the election, we hope this zine inspires New Yorkers to start or build power and energy toward a future free of all prosecutorial join campaigns to #DefundDAs and imagine safety, healing, and justice for mechanisms in New York.
  • Sen. Jeff Sessions's Record on Criminal Justice

    Sen. Jeff Sessions's Record on Criminal Justice

    Analysis: Sen. Jeff Sessions’s Record on Criminal Justice By Ames C. Grawert This analysis provides a brief summary of Sen. Jeff Sessions’s past statements, votes, and practices relating to criminal justice. Specifically, this analysis finds that: • Sen. Sessions opposes efforts to reduce unnecessarily long federal prison sentences for nonviolent crimes, despite a consensus for reform even within his own party. In 2016, he personally blocked the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, a bipartisan effort spearheaded by Sens. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Mike Lee (R-Utah), and John Cornyn (R- Texas), and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), and supported by law enforcement leadership. As Attorney General, Sen. Sessions could stall current congressional efforts to pass this legislation to recalibrate federal sentencing laws. • Drug convictions made up 40 percent of Sen. Sessions’s convictions when he served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama — double the rate of other Alabama federal prosecutors. Today, state and federal law enforcement officers have begun to focus resources on violent crime, and away from archaic drug war policies. But Sen. Sessions continues to oppose any attempts to legalize marijuana and any reduction in drug sentences. As Attorney General, Sen. Sessions could direct federal prosecutors to pursue the harshest penalties possible for even low-level drug offenses, a step backward from Republican- supported efforts to modernize criminal justice policy. • Unlike many Republican legislators, Sen. Sessions supports the use of “civil asset forfeiture,” which allows police to confiscate property from people who may not even be accused of a crime.
  • Crime and Forfeiture

    Crime and Forfeiture

    Crime and Forfeiture Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law January 22, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 97-139 Crime and Forfeiture Summary Forfeiture has long been an effective law enforcement tool. Congress and state legislatures have authorized its use for over 200 years. Every year, it redirects property worth billions of dollars from criminal to lawful uses. Forfeiture law has always been somewhat unique. By the close of the 20th century, however, legislative bodies, commentators, and the courts had begun to examine its eccentricities in greater detail because under some circumstances it could be not only harsh but unfair. The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA), P.L. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202 (2000), was a product of that reexamination. Modern forfeiture follows one of two procedural routes. Although crime triggers all forfeitures, they are classified as civil forfeitures or criminal forfeitures according to the nature of the procedure which ends in confiscation. Civil forfeiture is an in rem proceeding. The property is the defendant in the case. Unless the statute provides otherwise, the innocence of the owner is irrelevant—it is enough that the property was involved in a violation to which forfeiture attaches. As a matter of expedience and judicial economy, Congress often allows administrative forfeiture in uncontested civil confiscation cases. Criminal forfeiture is an in personam proceeding, and confiscation is possible only upon the conviction of the owner of the property. The Supreme Court has held that authorities may seize moveable property without prior notice or an opportunity for a hearing but that real property owners are entitled as a matter of due process to preseizure notice and a hearing.
  • Iacp New Members

    Iacp New Members

    44 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 200 | Alexandria, VA 22314, USA | 703.836.6767 or 1.800.THEIACP | www.theIACP.org IACP NEW MEMBERS New member applications are published pursuant to the provisions of the IACP Constitution. If any active member in good standing objects to an applicant, written notice of the objection must be submitted to the Executive Director within 60 days of publication. The full membership listing can be found in the online member directory under the Participate tab of the IACP website. Associate members are indicated with an asterisk (*). All other listings are active members. Published July 1, 2021. Australia Australian Capital Territory Canberra *Sanders, Katrina, Chief Medical Officer, Australian Federal Police New South Wales Parramatta Walton, Mark S, Assistant Commissioner, New South Wales Police Force Victoria Melbourne *Harman, Brett, Inspector, Victoria Police Force Canada Alberta Edmonton *Cardinal, Jocelyn, Corporal Peer to Peer Coordinator, Royal Canadian Mounted Police *Formstone, Michelle, IT Manager/Business Technology Transformation, Edmonton Police Service *Hagen, Deanna, Constable, Royal Canadian Mounted Police *Seyler, Clair, Corporate Communications, Edmonton Police Service Lac La Biche *Young, Aaron, Law Enforcement Training Instructor, Lac La Biche Enforcement Services British Columbia Delta *Bentley, Steven, Constable, Delta Police Department Nelson Fisher, Donovan, Chief Constable, Nelson Police Department New Westminster *Wlodyka, Art, Constable, New Westminster Police Department Surrey *Cassidy,
  • Reparations and Asset Forfeiture at the Extraordinary African Chambers

    Reparations and Asset Forfeiture at the Extraordinary African Chambers

    Journal of African Law, 63, 2 (2019), 151–161 © SOAS, University of London, 2019. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S0021855319000159 First published online 24 June 2019 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Victims’ Justice? Reparations and Asset Forfeiture at the Extraordinary African Chambers Daley J Birkett* Walther Schücking Institute for International Law, University of Kiel Amsterdam Center for International Law, University of Amsterdam [email protected] Abstract This article critically analyses the reparations and asset forfeiture framework at the Extraordinary African Chambers and its application in the case against Hissène Habré. It identifies obstacles to implementing the reparations awarded and calls for states and international organizations to support their realization for the sake of Habré’s victims, without whose efforts the tribunal might not exist. It argues that international(ized) criminal tribunals should more readily utilize fines and forfeit- ure as penalties to alleviate the pressure on trust funds to implement reparations awards, particularly in cases where convicted persons possess substantial assets. Lastly, in light of the requirement that assets susceptible to forfeiture orders be derived directly or indirectly from the crime(s) of which a person is found guilty, the article questions the failure of the prosecutor to charge Habré with the war crime of pillage, despite its availability in the tribunal’s statute and the finding that the suffering of many of Habré’s victims entitled to individual compensation resulted from pillage.
  • Forfeiture and Compensation for Victims of Crime

    Forfeiture and Compensation for Victims of Crime

    Chapter 12: Forfeiture and Compensation for Victims of Crime Forfeiture has become a critical tool in the recovery of illicit gains arising from financial crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, and theft. Prior to the enactment of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA) of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202 (2000), non-owner victims of crime could recover through remission only in criminal forfeitures and civil bank fraud forfeitures. In other civil forfeitures, victims could be compensated only where they were named in a criminal restitution order arising from the prosecution of a related offense. In 2000, CAFRA amended 18 U.S.C. § 981(e) to broaden the Attorney General’s authority to restore forfeited assets to the victims of any offense that gave rise to the forfeiture. Accordingly, remission authority now exists for all offenses for which a related civil or criminal forfeiture order is obtained. In concert with this expanded remission authority, the Criminal Division initiated a procedure in 2002 called “restoration.” This procedure enables the Attorney General to transfer forfeited funds to a court for satisfaction of a criminal restitution order, provided that the victim named in the order otherwise qualifies for remission under the applicable regulations. While remission and criminal restitution are not directly related, they may serve similar functions. Remission is discretionary relief intended to reduce the hardship that may arise from forfeiture for persons who have incurred a monetary loss from the offense underlying the forfeiture. Restitution is an equitable remedy that is intended to make crime victims whole and prevent unjust enrichment to the perpetrator.
  • Ideas for the New Administration: Criminal Justice | Manhattan Institute

    Ideas for the New Administration: Criminal Justice | Manhattan Institute

    Rafael A. Mangual Senior Fellow; Deputy Director, Legal Policy With the sharp uptick in violent crime in and around many American cities, the new government should seek to better protect public safety while fostering a fairer legal system. Three areas, in particular, are ripe for bipartisan action: • Policing • Civil asset forfeiture • Criminal justice reform 1. Policing Congress and the Biden administration should help fortify America’s dwindling local police forces. Violent crime—homicides and shootings, in particular—was on the upswing in many American cities in 2020. In New York City, for example, murders were up 38.2% through November 29 and shootings were up almost 96%. In Chicago, murders and shootings were up 55% and 53% through November 29. In St. Louis, through the end of November, murders were up 39%, compared with the same time in 2019. In Los Angeles, year-to-date shootings and homicides were up 33% and 29%, respectively, as of November 28. Through November 29, homicides in San Francisco were up 43%. In Atlanta, murders were up 48% through November 28, while shootings jumped 39%.1 The rise in the number and intensity of antipolice protests may be playing a role not just in the crime uptick2 but also in police officer attrition. New York, Chicago, Minneapolis, Milwaukee, and Atlanta are among the cities where officers have left their jobs in higher than usual numbers this year. The struggle of police *This issue brief was completed before the inauguration and updated as of January 26. departments to retain and recruit officers
  • In the United States District Court

    In the United States District Court

    Case 1:17-cv-00365-MCA-LF Document 14 Filed 04/28/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO LYNN R. FITZGERALD, AS A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AS A RESIDENT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, AND OF SAN JUAN COUNTY, Plaintiff(s), vs. 1:17-cv-00365-MCA-LF STATE OF NEW MEXICO, NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE, STATE POLICE OFFICER D. CAPEHARD, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS AN AGENT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, AND AS AN OFFICER OF THE NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE, THE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND REVENUE AS THE AGENT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, THE REGISTRATION AND LICENSING BUREAU, STATE POLICE CAPTAIN CHRIS BLAKE INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20 AS TRAINING OFFICERS AND SUPERVISORS OF OFFICER D. CAPEHART, AND SUSANA MARTINZ AS GOVERNOR, AND AS THE CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Defendant(s). ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants Susana Martinez, the State of New Mexico, the New Mexico State Police Department (“NMSP”), State Police Officer Daniel Capehart, the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department (“TRD”), and NMSP Captain Chris Blake’s (collectively “State Defendants”) Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss Based Upon Qualified Immunity filed April 7, 2017. Doc. 10. Plaintiff has not filed a response or indicated whether he opposes the motion. See Doc. 10 at 1. Having read the motion and noting that no response has been filed, the Court finds that the motion is well taken and will be GRANTED.
  • Critical Criminal Justice Issues

    Critical Criminal Justice Issues

    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice CriticalCritical CriminalCriminal JusticeJustice IssuesIssues TaskTask ForceForce ReportsReports FromFrom thethe AmericanAmerican SocietySociety ofof CriminologyCriminology toto AttorneyAttorney GeneralGeneral JanetJanet RenoReno FOREWORD There is a discernible urgency to the crime issue. Crime and the fear of crime rank as the most important issues in public opinion polls. Some communities resemble war zones where gunshots ring out every night. Other cities struggle to create islands of civility amid threats to public order posed by low-level criminal behavior that eludes traditional measures. Appropriately, public policymakers and administrators in the criminal justice system are responding to the issue of crime in all its complexity. Every aspect of the infrastructure of our traditional criminal justice policy is undergo- ing fundamental rethinking. Our approaches to policing, adjudication, sentencing, imprisonment, and community corrections are changing in significant ways. Indeed, communities that are suffering from crime are changing their interactions with the agencies of the criminal justice system as the concepts of community policing, community prosecution, and community justice take on real meaning in cities and towns around the country. This combination—a sense of urgency on the part of the public and a rapidly changing policy response—creates a compelling need for policy-relevant research. When Attorney General Janet Reno addressed the American Society of Criminology at its annual meeting in November 1994, she challenged Society members to translate their re- search findings into recommendations that would benefit the practitioners and policymakers who confront the issues of crime and justice. The reports presented in these pages are the response to that challenge.
  • Tradición Revista Volume 50

    Tradición Revista Volume 50

    Regis University ePublications at Regis University Tradición Revista 4-1-2010 Tradición Revista volume 50 Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/tradicionrevista Recommended Citation "Tradición Revista volume 50" (2010). Tradición Revista. 4. https://epublications.regis.edu/tradicionrevista/4 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tradición Revista by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TR ADICIÓN APRIL 2010 REVISTA La Fi e s t a d e Co L o r e s tr e a s u r e ta L e s o F Ne w Me x i C o su r v i v i N g Fi e r y Fo o d s CHARLIE CAR RILLO SA NTO BY CH A RLIE CA RRILLO A ND POTTERY BY DEBBIE CA RRILLO STUDIO BY APPOINTMENT 2712 Pas EO DE TUL A RO sa , SA NT A FE, NM 87505 505/473-7941 E-MA IL : CCA RR 1810@A OL .C OM One Nation One Year a navajo photographer’s 365-day journey into a world of discovery, life and hope Photographs by Don James with text by Karyth Becenti 128 pages 213 illustrations; 14 x 10 ISBN 978-1-890689-99-5 ($24.99) (Trade paper) “One Nation, One Year” is a photographic journey that transcends borders, languages, distance, time, and cultural barriers. For one year, Navajo photographer Don James drove from one side of the Navajo Nation to the other documenting arts, traditions, sports, and people.