DOCSLIB.ORG

(PSRU) Research Report 2 Civilian Control and Democratic Transition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(PSRU) Research Report 2 Civilian Control and Democratic Transition Pakistan Security Research Unit (PSRU) Research Report 2 Civilian Control and Democratic Transition: Pakistan’s Unequal Equation Siegfried O. Wolf 1 April 2013 About the Pakistan Security Research Unit (PSRU) The Pakistan Security Research Unit (PSRU) was established in March 2007 and relocated to Durham University on 1st April 2013. It serves as an independent portal and neutral platform for interdisciplinary research on all aspects of Pakistani security, dealing with Pakistan's impact on regional and global security, internal security issues within Pakistan, and the interplay of the two. PSRU provides information about, and critical analysis of, Pakistani security with particular emphasis on extremism/terrorism, nuclear weapons issues, and the internal stability and cohesion of the state. PSRU is intended as a resource for anyone interested in the security of Pakistan and provides: Briefing papers; Reports; Datasets; Consultancy; Academic, institutional and media links; An open space for those working for positive change in Pakistan and for those currently without a voice. PSRU welcomes collaboration from individuals, groups and organisations, which share our broad objectives. Please contact us at [email protected] We encourage you to look at the website available through: www.durham.ac.uk/psru/ Other PSRU Publications The following papers are freely available through the Pakistan Security Research Unit (PSRU): Report Number 1. The Jihadi Terrain in Pakistan: An Introduction to the Sunni Jihadi Groups in Pakistan and Kashmir Briefings Numbers 1-64 including: Brief Number 57. Socio Economic Cost of Terrorism: A case study of Pakistan Brief Number 58. Islamic Militancy getting worse, not better: The recent attacks on the Ahmadi mosques in Lahore Brief Number 59. An Analysis of Obama’s Af-Pak Goal and First Objective: Setting the Baseline and Prospects for Success Brief Number 60. Domestic Politics and Systemic Constraints in Pakistan’s India Policy Brief Number 61. The Limited Military Utility of Pakistan’s Battlefield Use of Nuclear Weapons in Response to Large Scale Indian Conventional Attack Brief Number 62. Getting Afghanistan Right Brief Number 63. Why Karachi is a Major Source of Instability in Pakistan? Brief Number 64. The arrest of Brig. Gen. Ali Khan and the influence of Hizb-ut- Tahrir in Pakistan All these papers are freely available from: www.durham.ac.uk/psru/ 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 4 About the Author .................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. Analytical Framework ........................................................................................................ 6 3. Emergence of Military Dominance .................................................................................. 12 3.1 Civil-Military Relations after Democratization (1988-1997): Failed Civilian Control . 15 3.2. Civil-Military Relations between 1997-1999: Semblance of Civilian Control ............. 20 3.3 Restoration of Military Dominance under Pervez Musharraf (1999-2007) ................... 22 3.4 After Musharraf: Civilian Control at the Edge ............................................................... 23 4. Civil-Military Relations and Democracy ......................................................................... 25 5. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 27 Bibliography: ........................................................................................................................ 29 List of interviews .................................................................................................................. 35 3 Executive Summary Civilian control of the armed forces is a sine qua non for democratic consolidation. In Pakistan, since its existence, the military played an eminent role in all spheres of socio- economic and political life. In this context it is stated by several analysts that the soldiers are mainly responsible for the country’s setbacks on its path to democratic consolidation. The main argument made is that the military top brass, through either formal or informal interventions, were able to avoid the institutionalization of civilian control. Civilian control is understood as the distribution of decision-making power between civilians and the armed forces. This report sheds light on the successes and failures in the efforts of civilian governments to establish supremacy over the country’s armed forces in order to consolidate democratic rule. The analysis derives from a conceptualization of civilian control that distinguishes five areas of political decision-making: elite-recruitment, public policy, internal security, national defence, and internal security. In order to establish control in these various areas civilians have a choice between different strategies for which they need certain resources. In this context, the study shows that civil-military relations in Pakistan have tended to be affected by historical legacies, leading to the emergence of military dominance which undermined the civilian supremacy and affected the quality of democracy. About the Author Dr. Siegfried O. Wolf is lecturer at the South Asia Institute (SAI) and a former research fellow at the Institute of Political Science (IPW), both at Heidelberg University. His research interests focus on democratization, civil–military relations, political parties, social movements, identity constructions and conflicts in South Asia. He is co-author of A Political and Economic Dictionary of South Asia (London: Routledge, 2006), and Deputy Editor of the Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics (HPSACP). Additionally, he is Director of Research, South Asia Democratic Forum (SADF), a Brussels based think tank. Acknowledgements This article contains results from the research project “Democratic Transformation and Civilian Control of the Military: Comparing New Democracies in Northeast, Southeast, and South Asia” conducted from 2008 to 2011 at Heidelberg University with funding by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The author wishes to thank Aurel Croissant, David Kuehn, Philip Voelkel and Paul Chambers as well as the editors for their helpful comments. 4 Civilian Control and Democratic Transition: Pakistan’s Unequal Equation Siegfried O. Wolf 1. Introduction Pakistan, as an example of the case of failed civilian control over the armed forces, does not fit into the story of global triumph of democratization. This is because the military was able to establish itself as the most dominant actor in politics and civilians have never succeeded in achieving any effective and sustainable amount of civilian supremacy. This limited not only the effective power to govern of (elected) civilian administrations, but also created deviancies regarding the electoral regime, political liberties, political participation and horizontal accountability. Therefore, Pakistan must be classified as a ‘defective democracy’, which is only partly free (Freedom House, 2011). These defects are deeply rooted in the history of civil-military relations in Pakistan and determined by two trends: First, as the army grew in strength and size over time, the development of the political system became characterised by a lack of institutionalization and chronic instability (Nawaz, 2008, xxviii). This created an imbalance of power, favoring the armed forces and, simultaneously, further weakened civilian power in the political decision-making process. Second, there has been a tendency for the military to institutionalize its political role (especially under Zia ul-Haq and Pervez Musharraf) featured by three criteria: (1) the abandonment of former personalized forms of exercising political influence (Ayub Khan and partly Yahya Khan); (2) the (informal) induction of broader sections of the armed forces into the political system to run the affairs of state; and (3) the constitutional entrenchment of a political role for the armed forces, e.g. the introduction of the 8th Amendment. These developments led to the emergence of a phenomenon in Pakistan’s political decision-making which is commonly described as the ‘rule of the Troika’ (Rizvi, 2003; Kukreja, 2003). Generally this term is supposed to illustrate the system of power-sharing between civilians and military, embodied through the three most significant agents in the political system of Pakistan: The chief of army staff (COAS), the president and the prime minister. Due to exogenous and endogenous factors producing a high degree of volatility in the balance of power between these three agents, the main feature of this sometimes constitutional, sometimes extra-constitutional arrangement has been a persistent struggle for power between civilians and the military. This clash limited the access to resources for civilians to establish civilian control over the military since Pakistan come into existence. From British colonial rule until 1971, Pakistan has witnessed the evolution of a strong military within an alliance with the country’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISI in Pakistan's Domestic Politics
    ISI in Pakistan’s Domestic Politics: An Assessment Jyoti M. Pathania D WA LAN RFA OR RE F S E T Abstract R U T D The articleN showcases a larger-than-life image of Pakistan’s IntelligenceIE agencies Ehighlighting their role in the domestic politics of Pakistan,S C by understanding the Inter-Service Agencies (ISI), objectives and machinations as well as their domestic political role play. This is primarily carried out by subverting the political system through various means, with the larger aim of ensuring an unchallenged Army rule. In the present times, meddling, muddling and messing in, the domestic affairs of the Pakistani Government falls in their charter of duties, under the rubric of maintenance of national security. Its extra constitutional and extraordinary powers have undoubtedlyCLAWS made it the potent symbol of the ‘Deep State’. V IC ON TO ISI RY H V Introduction THROUG The incessant role of the Pakistan’s intelligence agencies, especially the Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI), in domestic politics is a well-known fact and it continues to increase day by day with regime after regime. An in- depth understanding of the subject entails studying the objectives and machinations, and their role play in the domestic politics. Dr. Jyoti M. Pathania is Senior Fellow at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi. She is also the Chairman of CLAWS Outreach Programme. 154 CLAWS Journal l Winter 2020 ISI IN PAKISTAN’S DOMESTIC POLITICS ISI is the main branch of the Intelligence agencies, charged with coordinating intelligence among the
    [Show full text]
  • Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan
    Fall 08 September 2012 Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic Stanford Law School Global Justice Clinic http://livingunderdrones.org/ NYU School of Law Cover Photo: Roof of the home of Faheem Qureshi, a then 14-year old victim of a January 23, 2009 drone strike (the first during President Obama’s administration), in Zeraki, North Waziristan, Pakistan. Photo supplied by Faheem Qureshi to our research team. Suggested Citation: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION CLINIC (STANFORD LAW SCHOOL) AND GLOBAL JUSTICE CLINIC (NYU SCHOOL OF LAW), LIVING UNDER DRONES: DEATH, INJURY, AND TRAUMA TO CIVILIANS FROM US DRONE PRACTICES IN PAKISTAN (September, 2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I ABOUT THE AUTHORS III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS V INTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 2 CHALLENGES 4 CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 7 DRONES: AN OVERVIEW 8 DRONES AND TARGETED KILLING AS A RESPONSE TO 9/11 10 PRESIDENT OBAMA’S ESCALATION OF THE DRONE PROGRAM 12 “PERSONALITY STRIKES” AND SO-CALLED “SIGNATURE STRIKES” 12 WHO MAKES THE CALL? 13 PAKISTAN’S DIVIDED ROLE 15 CONFLICT, ARMED NON-STATE GROUPS, AND MILITARY FORCES IN NORTHWEST PAKISTAN 17 UNDERSTANDING THE TARGET: FATA IN CONTEXT 20 PASHTUN CULTURE AND SOCIAL NORMS 22 GOVERNANCE 23 ECONOMY AND HOUSEHOLDS 25 ACCESSING FATA 26 CHAPTER 2: NUMBERS 29 TERMINOLOGY 30 UNDERREPORTING OF CIVILIAN CASUALTIES BY US GOVERNMENT SOURCES 32 CONFLICTING MEDIA REPORTS 35 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan's 2008 Elections
    Pakistan’s 2008 Elections: Results and Implications for U.S. Policy name redacted Specialist in South Asian Affairs April 9, 2008 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL34449 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Pakistan’s 2008 Elections: Results and Implications for U.S. Policy Summary A stable, democratic, prosperous Pakistan actively working to counter Islamist militancy is considered vital to U.S. interests. Pakistan is a key ally in U.S.-led counterterrorism efforts. The history of democracy in Pakistan is a troubled one marked by ongoing tripartite power struggles among presidents, prime ministers, and army chiefs. Military regimes have ruled Pakistan directly for 34 of the country’s 60 years in existence, and most observers agree that Pakistan has no sustained history of effective constitutionalism or parliamentary democracy. In 1999, the democratically elected government of then-Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was ousted in a bloodless coup led by then-Army Chief Gen. Pervez Musharraf, who later assumed the title of president. In 2002, Supreme Court-ordered parliamentary elections—identified as flawed by opposition parties and international observers—seated a new civilian government, but it remained weak, and Musharraf retained the position as army chief until his November 2007 retirement. In October 2007, Pakistan’s Electoral College reelected Musharraf to a new five-year term in a controversial vote that many called unconstitutional. The Bush Administration urged restoration of full civilian rule in Islamabad and called for the February 2008 national polls to be free, fair, and transparent. U.S. criticism sharpened after President Musharraf’s November 2007 suspension of the Constitution and imposition of emergency rule (nominally lifted six weeks later), and the December 2007 assassination of former Prime Minister and leading opposition figure Benazir Bhutto.
    [Show full text]
  • KAS International Reports 10/2015
    Other Topics 10|2015 KAS INTERNATIONAL REPORTS 61 ROLE OR RULE? THE EVOLUTION OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS IN PAKISTAN 2014 - 2015 Zafar Nawaz Jaspal INTRODUCTION The Pakistanis celebrated the 67th anniversary of their country’s independence amidst immense political bewilderment. The power appeared to be draining away from elected Prime Minister Mian Nawaz Sharif. The celebration marking the anniversary of inde- pendence at the mid-night in front of the Parliament building on 14 August 2014 seemed a regime saving tactic. Notwithstanding, Dr. Zafar Nawaz the smart political move to demonstrate that the Prime Minister Jaspal is the Director of the enjoys complete trust and support of the military, the processes School of Politics for political polarisation has been unleashed in the insecurity- and International ridden country by both Azadi March (freedom movement) led by Relations at the Quaid-I-Azam Uni- cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan and Inqlab March (revolu- versity Islamabad, tion movement) led by Canada-based Sunni cleric Tahir-ul- Qadri Pakistan. in Lahore on 14 August 2014. The demonstrators demanded the resignation of an elected Premier Sharif and fresh elections in the country. Imran Khan, chairman of Tehreek-i-Insaf,1 ques- tioned the legitimacy of the government by claiming that the 2013 general elections were rigged.2 Khan’s critics opined that he was being manipulated by the Military to try to bring down Premier Sharif or at least check him by questioning his political legitimacy. The accusation of rigging in general elections not only dented the legitimacy of elected government of Premier Nawaz Sharif, but also increased the role of the military in the Pakistani polity.
    [Show full text]
  • “Reconciliation” in Pakistan, 2006-2017: a Critical Reappraisal
    Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan Volume No. 54, Issue No. 2 (July - December 2017) Muhammad Iqbal Chawla ERA OF “RECONCILIATION” IN PAKISTAN, 2006-2017: A CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL Abstract This paper deals with an era of unusual political development which can be described as the „era of reconciliation‟ from 2006 to 2017. This era was unique in Pakistan‟s history because it brought closer all political parties for restoration, protection, and continuation of democracy in Pakistan. However, after a decade this period, sometimes also can be characterized as the era of the Charter of Democracy (COD,) seems to be losing its relevance because of surfacing of anti- democratic forces. Therefore this paper traces the causes, events and the deep impact of the policy of „reconciliation‟ and also touches upon why and how it seems to be coming to an end. As a national leader Benazir Bhutto had political acumen and she propounded the “Philosophy of Reconciliation” after having gone through some bitter political experiences as a Prime Minister and leader of the Opposition. Both Benazir and Mian Nawaz Sharif learnt the lesson when they were sent into their respective exile by General Musharraf. Having learnt their lessons both of them decided upon strengthening the culture of democracy in Pakistan. Benazir not only originated the idea of Reconciliation but also tried to translate her ideas into actions by concluding the „Charter of Democracy‟ (“COD”) with other political parties especially with the Pakistan Muslim League (hereafter “PML (N)”), in 2006”. Introduction Asif Ali Zardari1 as PPP2‟s main leader tried to implement this philosophy after the sudden death of Benazir Buhtto and particularly during his term as President of Pakistan (2008-2013).
    [Show full text]
  • KRISENSTAAT TÜRKEI Zum Buch
    KRISENSTAAT TÜRKEI Zum Buch Vor kurzem noch galt die Türkei als Staat, der West und Ost, Islam und Demokratie vereint, der Vorbild sein kann für die gesamte Region. Heute ist die Türkei ein Krisenstaat, der sich von inneren und äußeren Feinden bedroht sieht und in dem Demokratie und Rechtsstaatlich- keit erheblich unter Druck geraten sind. Rücksichtslos lässt Präsident Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Andersgläubige und Andersdenkende verfolgen, immer heftiger provoziert er Konflikte mit Nachbarn und außenpoliti- schen Partnern, nicht zuletzt mit Deutschland. SPIEGEL-ONLINE-Kor- respondent Hasnain Kazim hat miterlebt, wie sich die Türkei in den ver- gangenen Jahren radikalisierte. Er zeigt, wie explosiv die Situation im Land ist und was das Ende der Demokratie am Bosporus bedeutet – für die Türkei, für die Region und für Europa. Zum Autor Hasnain Kazim, 1974 als Sohn indisch-pakistanischer Einwanderer in Oldenburg geboren, schreibt seit 2004 für SPIEGEL ONLINE und den SPIEGEL. Seit 2009 lebt er als Korrespondent im Ausland, von 2013 bis 2016 berichtete er aus Istanbul. Nachdem er die Türkei verlassen musste, ist er heute Korrespondent in Wien. Bei allem politischen und religiö- sen Extremismus, dem Kazim bei seiner Arbeit begegnet, versucht er, auch das Schöne und Alltägliche zu beschreiben. Für seine Bericht- erstattung wurde er als »Politikjournalist des Jahres« geehrt und mit dem »CNN Journalist Award« ausgezeichnet. Zuletzt veröffentlichte er unter dem Titel »Plötzlich Pakistan« seine Erfahrungen als Auslands- korrespondent (2015). Hasnain Kazim KRISENSTAAT TÜRKEI Erdoğan und das Ende der Demokratie am Bosporus Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt Das Mottozitat auf Seite 9 ist mit freundlicher Genehmigung des Verlags dem Band Istanbul: Erinnerungen an eine Stadt von Orhan Pamuk entnommen (Carl Hanser Verlag, München, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Exposing the Clandestine: Silence and Voice in America's Drone War
    Exposing the Clandestine: Silence and Voice in America’s Drone War By Terilyn Johnston Huntington Submitted to the graduate degree program in Political Science and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Donald Haider-Markel ________________________________ Dr. Mark Joslyn ________________________________ Dr. Adrian Lewis ________________________________ Dr. Burdett A. Loomis ________________________________ Dr. William Staples Date Defended: 15 July 2016 ii The Dissertation Committee for Terilyn Johnston Huntington certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Exposing the Clandestine: Silence and Voice in America’s Drone War ________________________________ Chairperson Dr. Donald Haider-Markel Date approved: 15 July 2016 iii Abstract The increasing reliance of the American military on weaponized drones in counter terrorism efforts has produced a contentious debate regarding the use of drones. This debate is characterized by two competing social discourses. First, a dominant discourse, articulated by the political elite in the United States, that advocates the use of drones as an issue of national security, while maintaining the clandestine nature of the drone program. Second, a subversive discourse, primarily articulated by legal scholars and human rights organizations, that criticize the civilian casualties resulting from the United States’ use of drones and attempts to
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan-U.S. Relations
    Order Code RL33498 Pakistan-U.S. Relations Updated March 27, 2008 K. Alan Kronstadt Specialist in South Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Pakistan-U.S. Relations Summary A stable, democratic, prosperous Pakistan is considered vital to U.S. interests. U.S. concerns regarding Pakistan include regional and global terrorism; Afghan stability; democratization and human rights protection; the ongoing Kashmir problem and Pakistan-India tensions; and economic development. A U.S.-Pakistan relationship marked by periods of both cooperation and discord was transformed by the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States and the ensuing enlistment of Pakistan as a key ally in U.S.-led counterterrorism efforts. Top U.S. officials regularly praise Pakistan for its ongoing cooperation, although doubts exist about Islamabad’s commitment to some core U.S. interests. Pakistan is identified as a base for terrorist groups and their supporters operating in Kashmir, India, and Afghanistan. Pakistan’s army has conducted unprecedented and largely ineffectual counterterrorism operations in the country’s western tribal areas, where Al Qaeda operatives and their allies are believed to enjoy “safehavens.” A separatist insurgency in the divided Kashmir region has been underway since 1989. India has long blamed Pakistan for the infiltration of Islamic militants into its Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir state, a charge Islamabad denies. The United States and India have received pledges from Islamabad that all “cross-border terrorism” would cease and that any terrorist facilities in Pakistani-controlled areas would be closed. The United States strongly encourages maintenance of a bilateral cease-fire and continued, substantive dialogue between Pakistan and India, which have fought three wars since 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • The Removal of Nawaz Sharif and Changing Role of Punjab in Pakistani Politics
    December 2014 15 August 2017 The Removal of Nawaz Sharif and Changing Role of Punjab in Pakistani Politics Tridivesh Singh Maini FDI Associate Key Points The removal from office of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif could be the precedent for a change of approach towards the civil-military relationship on the part of the influential province of Punjab. The most populous province of Pakistan, Punjab has long dominated the Pakistani polity and military. Sharif’s party, the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), heads both the Punjab provincial government and the national government. If the PML-N decides to continue Sharif’s attempts at better relations with India, it will again place the government at odds with the army, which wants oversight of foreign policy issues pertaining to Afghanistan and India. If the PML-N is interested in improving links with India, it will need to take action against terrorist groups. Summary The most populous province of Pakistan, Punjab has long dominated the Pakistani polity and military. Initially, at least, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif – a Punjabi – enjoyed a close relationship with the army. That relationship soured, however, following his dismissal from office during his first term as Prime Minister in 1993. A key factor for the falling out between Sharif and the army was the former’s attempts to build a better relationship with India. Arguably, that enmity only increased during Sharif’s third, most recent, term in office. In the wake of Sharif’s disqualification on 28 July 2017, the influential, traditionally pro-army Punjab leadership is now instead backing Sharif’s party, the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), or PML-N.
    [Show full text]
  • A Serener Transition of Command from PPP to PML-N
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 19, Issue 9, Ver. IV (Sep. 2014), PP 102-108 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Democratic Milestone in Pakistan: A Serener Transition of Command from PPP to PML-N 1 2 3 4 Muhammad Rizwan , Rafiuddin , Muhammad Arshid , Muhammad Waqar 1,2(Department of Pakistan Studies, Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan) 3,4(Department of Political Science, Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan) Abstract: and above all promulgation of the eminent 18th Constitutional amendment. One way or the other, these reforms helped to a conduct Constitutional struggle in Pakistan took almost four decades to attain an atmosphere where a peaceful transition from one democratically elected government to another could become possible. For the first time, the government of Pakistan People’s Party, under President Asif Ali Zardari, successfully completed its five years term. The PPP government, time and again, introduced a number of administrative, political and constitutional reforms including the electoral reforms, neutrality of Election Commission, consensus on caretaker government, independence of judiciary a free and fair election in 2013 resulting a nonviolent power transition to the majority party. Present study strives to dig-out the facts that made this transition of authority possible. This is an historical research; therefore, historical research method along with descriptive method is used to understand the existing phenomenon. Keywords: Peaceful transition, Democracy, Military dictatorship, Pakistan People’s Party I. Introduction It has taken almost forty years after the promulgation of 1973 Constitution to establish such a federal parliamentary system in Pakistan where a successful political transition has been witnessed.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 China's Foreign Aid and Investment Diplomacy in Southeast Asia
    Notes 1 China’s Foreign Aid and Investment Diplomacy in Southeast Asia 1 . John F. Copper, China’s Foreign Aid: An Instrument of Peking’s Foreign Policy (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1976), pp. 27–28. 2 . Jay Taylor, China and Southeast Asia: Peking’s Relations with Revolutionary Movements (New York: Praeger, 1974), p. 5. 3 . Bernard Fall, Street without Joy (Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole, 1961), p. 27, and Robert Shaplen, The Lost Revolution (New York: Harper and Row, 1966), p. 69. 4 . Taylor, China and Southeast Asia , p. 5. 5 . J. J. Zasloff, “The Role of the Sanctuary in Insurgency, Communist China’s Support for the Vietminh, 1946–1954,” Rand Corporation Memorandum RM-4618TR, May 1967, p. 5. 6 . Taylor, China and Southeast Asia, p. 9 and 13. 7 . Copper, China’s Foreign Aid , p. 28. 8 . Chu Hao, “Enduring Ties: Sino-Vietnamese Relations Witness Their 60th Anniversary amid High Hopes,” Beijing Review , January 14, 2010, p. 14. 9 . Taylor, China and Southeast Asia , p. 7. Secretary of State Dean Acheson said at the time: “The choice confronting the U.S. is to support the legal governments of Indochina or to face the extension of Communism over the remainder of the continental area of Southeast Asia and possibly westward.” See Pentagon Papers (New York: Bantam Books, 1962), p. 36. 10 . Hao, “Enduring Ties,” p. 14. The author contends that the Geneva agreements could not have been reached had it not been for China’s aid. 11 . Taylor, China and Southeast Asia , p. 18. 12 . Copper, China’s Foreign Aid , p.
    [Show full text]
  • India As a Security Provider
    ASIAN STRATEGIC REVIEW 2015 India as a Security Provider ASIAN STRATEGIC REVIEW 2015 India as a Security Provider Editors S.D. MUNI VIVEK CHADHA INSTITUTE FOR DEFENCE STUDIES & ANALYSES NEW DELHI PENTAGON PRESS Asian Strategic Review 2015: India as a Security Provider S.D. Muni, Vivek Chadha (Eds) First Published in 2015 Copyright © Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi ISBN 978-81-8274-825-5 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without first obtaining written permission of the copyright owner. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, or the Government of India. Published by PENTAGON PRESS 206, Peacock Lane, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi-110049 Phones: 011-64706243, 26491568 Telefax: 011-26490600 email: [email protected] website: www.pentagonpress.in Branch Flat No.213, Athena-2, Clover Acropolis, Viman Nagar, Pune-411014 Email: [email protected] In association with Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses No. 1, Development Enclave, New Delhi-110010 Phone: +91-11-26717983 Website: www.idsa.in Printed at Avantika Printers Private Limited. Contents List of Contributors vii 1. Introduction 1 S.D. Muni 2. Political Will and Military Capacity to Provide Security 9 Brig Rumel Dahiya (Retd) INDIA AND ITS IMMEDIATE NEIGHBOURS 3. Can India be a Security Provider to its Neighbours: Competing Interests, Dichotomical Expectations, Challenges and Constraints 31 Smruti S Pattanaik 4.
    [Show full text]