Governor Rell Announces $31.7 Million Expansion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Governor Rell Announces $31.7 Million Expansion January/February 2006 • Volume 16, Number 1 Marketing and Public Relations Office Staff and Faculty Newsletter Available online: tunxis.commnet.edu Governor Rell Announces $31.7 Million Expansion master development plan and marks the first new construction on campus in 13 years. The new construction will provide some breathing room and pleasing enhancements to study, studio and social space on campus. “This long-awaited expansion will enable Successful Alumnus Tunxis to serve thousands of additional Knows Value of Tunxis students from the Farmington Valley well into this century,” Governor Rell said. “Connecticut’s Community Colleges are Barry J. Cunningham, principal of BJC experiencing unprecedented growth because Valuation Services in Simsbury, knows the higher learning is invaluable in today’s world. value of Tunxis. I am committed to providing our students The Simsbury resident attended Tunxis and faculty with the best facilities possible. from 1996-1997 to complete the courses Investments in our state colleges and he needed towards his bachelor’s degree, Tunxis Community College has for many universities are investments in our future.” which he had begun at Pennsylvania State years had the smallest footprint (assignable Phase 1 will include construction of a new University in the 1980s. He was driving by space per student) of any college in New library, science & technology building, larger Tunxis, and decided then and there to England. On 12/2/05, Governor M. Jodi Rell Academic Support Center, dental hygiene pursue finishing his degree by enrolling in visited Tunxis to announce a commitment of lab/classrooms, art and graphics studios, cafe, “Philosophy 101” at the College. $31,704,000 in state bond funding to support general purpose classrooms, exhibition “That started me on the path of a campus enhancement of Tunxis.The funding space, individual study areas and walkway. a major change in my life,” explained was approved at the state Bond Commission Tunxis now serves nearly 5,000 credit Cunningham, whose real estate and meeting on 12/9/05 and continuing education students each consulting firm heavily emphasizes tax and The project will add 104,000 square feet academic year, a growth of 20 percent in the litigation consulting. to the current campus, more than doubling last seven years. the size of the College’s facilities.The funding Cunningham An official groundbreaking ceremony will –continued on p. 5 will complete the first phase of the College’s be scheduled as soon as possible. I In Memory of 258 Scott Swamp purchased Dr. George Dursthoff 1937-2005 From an obituary that appeared in The Bristol Press on 9/7/05— George H. Dursthoff, 68, of New Hartford died Thursday,Sept. 1, as the result of a boating accident. George was a graduate of On 6/16/05,Tunxis CC Foundation purchased 258 Scott See the Tunxis Campus Swamp Road, anad it will make this property available to Columbia University with a doctorate in the College.The two-story, 2,258 sq. foot brick Cape was Expansion unfold! education. He taught for 30 years at Tunxis built in 1952 and sits on almost seven acres Visit tunxis.commnet.edu, Community College in Farmington, where of land. Helen Zebrowski, who passed away in 11/05, he was a trusted adviser, teacher, friend and her sister Genevieve were the former owners. and click off the home page Dursthoff–continued on p. 11 for regular updates Education That Works For a Lifetime tunxis.commnet.edu by Cathryn L. Addy, Ph.D. Assessing Effectiveness Requires Comprehensive Approach That Encompasses Institutional Mission Consideration Necessary in Defining and Balancing Educational Outcomes with Student Goals, Employer and University Requirements Thirty-five years ago, a young, inexperienced, teacher entered a community college classroom to face her first college-level classes—four freshman composition sections and one Introduction to World Literature. She had just completed a master’s degree in English with an emphasis in Contemporary American Literature; absolutely nothing in her own academic background, other than two years of teaching in a large city high school, prepared her for what she was assigned to do. Everything was trial and error as she tried to stay one or two days ahead of the Lit class in the reading assignments and then lecture nervously from notes prepared the night before. She was no more at ease in the composition classes, teaching from a text she hadn’t chosen full of essays and short stories she had never read and trying to get her students to write cogent essays themselves on assignments that were developed more on instinct than on sound theory. She shared an office with two other members of the department but the department chair was located in another building and was busy with his own issues.The only mentoring she received,therefore,was from her office mates or from occasional conversations with other faculty. She was given no information about writing syllabi (What? Let the students know what was expected of them?) or creating a plan for where she wanted/needed to be pedagogically by the end of the semester, or what the expectations were of her students—or of her, for that matter. Evaluation consisted of someone visiting a class at some designated period and then writing up a subjective description of what had been observed.There were office hours to be kept, but otherwise she had no responsibility to be involved in any aspect of the institution other than her own classes and students. Finally, she was assigned 25 advisees, all Early Childhood majors, a program about which she had absolutely no information or interest and no guidance other than what she read in the catalog along with the advisees. The point of this little vignette (yes, I am describing my own experience) is to illustrate how much has changed, and is changing, in community college education.The circumstances under which I started my community college career do not exist at Tunxis, thankfully. We have become much better at orienting and guiding new faculty; we have become more definitive about what is expected in the classroom and what materials the students are to have to help them succeed in any course; we have spent enormous time and energy testing and placing students so that only those prepared for college-level work actually are allowed to enroll in college-level classes; we have codified evaluation within an inch of its life; we have spent time and money getting technology of all kinds infused into the educational processes; we have agonized over admissions and registration processes and had “elimination of waiting in line” one of our Holy Grail; and we have figured out that academic advising really is important, after all. In essence, we have spent the past 35 years refining many of the processes and measurements that have defined us as an institution of higher education, and we have taken seriously the responsibility of teaching effectively. Ah, but we are not yet done.The one area we have paid but scant attention is defining what we want our students to be when they leave Tunxis.We know precisely what scores they must have on Accuplacer to get in our college-level classes, and we know the numerical value of the grades on the grading scale and the grade point average required for graduation or continuation of financial aid, and we know which courses will transfer and which ones will not. But, do we honestly know how to define “The Tunxis Student” and who that person is as a result of his or her experiences with us? Do we really know how, or if, everything we have spent years creating is really working? What good is it to have general education outcomes if we don’t have a way of assessing them? How does it help us to revise existing curricula or create new programs if we have no way of determining whether or not the changes are meeting our goals? And, by the way, what are our educational goals for our students? What are our students’ educational goals for themselves? How do we match student goals with Tunxis goals and with university and employer demands? What is the best way to balance them, should they differ? Finally, who are the students we see before us in this relatively new century? They really are getting younger, and we really are getting older! Are we as prepared as we need to be to face this generation of students, in spite of our constant attention to their preparation? It would be so much easier if we could just put up a bumper sticker like the one seen on trucks (“Hi! How is my driving? Call 1-800- Watch-Out”). I don’t think that NEASC, or DHE, or the Legislature-From-Whence–Cometh-All-Funding would be very amused, however. Thus, we might as well do our assessment of our effectiveness as thoroughly as we have done everything else over the years. It is time to put that last piece in place. However, we need also to be patient:Tunxis was not created overnight, nor will change occur overnight. It does seem realistic, though, to project that five or six years from now, we will be able to answer the questions not only about who the Tunxis students are but also how much progress we have made toward closing the remaining gap between what we think we are doing and what we can prove we are doing. At that point we will accurately be able to say we are a student-centered College. I January/February 2006 2 Tunxis Trains the Knowledge Worker, says Stephen R.
Recommended publications
  • Football Team Went Down in Bitter Defeat at the Hands of the Strong New Haven Team
    mm m 1' i>: i'S. 9 r '-V.'SS i i . ■ \ M ! i : • * . '•4$M m . tk rn t;> s I 9 WISTARIAN | ! I: ' 1 -* '■>. "• ' A • vV'-io'r s'.'"i'.^/'-^: ';>> TA V-' V'.: 'i*fvA 3$g mm«pi ■filllll®:-v ■>-. 'jS’V v' v -V •• 'f I i 1 Wistarian 1959 University of Bridgeport Bridgeport, Connecticut Staff r \ i! ; Editor Charles S. Huestis Assistant Editor John B. Stewart, III V;. :«***. ^ : Art Editor Robert Stumpek i. ! • Copy Editor Sally Ann Podufaly T, - & ■ i — . Advisor Victor Swain I *» Art Advisor Sybil Wilson > I- •t els \} M U»-T«ip»^9 I •t. •? = . ‘ V . • • .. • - - • t i t ■ 5 •, -----------I — v .... P L: r ■ «« m "" > N. / «' i ■. L 'KH A ,-iii 1 : V T vV i =U ■ ’ \ 5 tsrThe title of this article, slightly altered, I becomes the keyword of our generation. ' nForward. The word itself connotes the rest- 04 0 less undercurrent that has intensified man's recent advancement. We are now riding a crest of inventive achievement. New \rs ideas have spurred manufacture and trans­ portation. Very recently men have begun to muster their frail strength and utilize their intelligence to probe the mysteries of the universe. Gropingly, steadily, man continues to extend his mastery over the elements. The world we are about to enter is brilliant, tense, and challenging; it is a place where new achievements and new dangers are born simultaneously. During this time of explosive advances, we here at the University have lived exact- ly the same collegiate pattern which our predecessors lived years ago. We studied untii daybreak; then fortified with black coffcwe went doggedly to class to be tested: v/e shelved our books in favor of the bj.ketball games, "bull" sessions, or do* when the threat of mental combat was loss imminent; we spent countless hours discussing the administration, the world situation, the faculty, our classmates.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Cross Registration
    CROSS REGISTRATION GRADUATE STUDENTS “Empowering and Investing in Connecticut’s students for College, for Leadership, for Life.” www.hartfordconsortium.org | / hchehartford | /HartfordConsortium HCHE Members: Capital Community College, Central Connecticut State University, Goodwin College, Manchester Community College, Hartford Seminary, St. Thomas Seminary, Trinity College, University of Saint Joseph, UCONN - Hartford, University of Hartford Affiliate Members: Connecticut Public/CPTV/WNPR, TheaterWorks GRADUATE STUDENTS Welcome to the Cross Registration program sponsored by the member colleges and universities of the Hartford Consortium for Higher Education. By participating in this program you have the opportunity to expand your learning experience, learn about other institutions of higher education in our region and maximize your personal educational goals. In order to take full advantage of the cross registration program, and to satisfy all requirements for registration and participation, it is very important that you read this brochure carefully. If you have any questions, you may contact your home school’s registrar’s office or the HCHE office. See the contact list below: HOW TO SELECT A COURSE Contact the Registrar at the host school for courses and availability options **Connecticut Public/CPTV/WNPR and TheaterWorks are HCHE Affiliate members Capital Community College Registrar: Argelio Marrero St. Thomas Seminary 950 Main Street, Rm. 207, Hartford CT 06103 Gayle Keene 860-906-5125 | [email protected] 467 Bloomfield Avenue, Bloomfield CT 06002 860-242-5573 Ext. 2662 | [email protected] Central CT State University UCONN-Hartford Associate Registrar: Matthew Bielawa Assistant Registrar: Nicole Ariyavatkul 1615 Stanley Street, Davidson Hall, Rm 116 Thelma Morris 860-832-2236 | [email protected] 10 Prospect Street, Hartford CT 06106 959-200-3833 | [email protected] | [email protected] Goodwin College University of Hartford Assistant Registrar: Rebecca Straub Registrar Administrator: Sandra Stevens 1 Riverside Drive, Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • UB Catalog 2016-2018
    Faculty 373 Faculty Abdelshakour A. Abuzneid Ioana A. Badara *Darryl Brock Associate Professor of Computer Science and Assistant Professor of Education Adjunct Assistant Professor of History Engineering B.S., University of Bucharest, Romania; M.S., B.S., Auburn University, M.S., University of B.S., M.S., Ph.D., University of Bridgeport University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK; Ph.D., South Florida, M.A., Claremont Graduate Kadir Akyuz University of Tennessee University Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice and Hassan Bajwa Allison E. Buller Human Security Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering Assistant Professor of Counseling B.S., Police Academy Ankara, Turkey; M.S., B.S., Polytechnic University of New York; B.S., M.S., University of Louisiana, Ph.D., Kocaeli University, Turkey; Ph.D., Sam M.S., The City College of New York; Ph.D., Western Michigan University Huston State University The City University of New York *Cheryl Burdette Mohammed Al-Azdee Buket D. Barkana Adjunct Assistant Professor of Nutrition Assistant Professor of Mass Communication Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering B.S. Psychology, University of Alabama; N.D., B.S., University of Baghdad; M.A., Indiana B.S., Anadolu University; M.S., Ph.D., Bastyr University University; Ph.D., Indiana University Eskisehir Osmangazi University Elena L. Cahill Janet Albert Dave O. Benjamin Senior Lecturer Associate Professor of Fashion Merchandising Associate Professor of Political Economy B.S., JD, University of Bridgeport, School of B.S., Syracuse University; M.A., New York B.A., Carlton University; Ph.D., Cambridge Law University University Albert Cantito *Rida Ali *Kenneth Benson Clinical Associate Professor Adjunct Assistant Professor of Nutrition Adjunct Faculty of Industrial Design D.C., New York Chiropractic College B.S., Cairo University; M.S., University of B.S., University of Bridgeport *Brett M.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 List of Colleges to Which Our High School Seniors Have Been Accepted
    2016 List of Colleges to which our High School Seniors Have Been Accepted Bulkeley High School American International College Capital Community College Central CT State University College of New Rochelle Connecticut College Dean College Delaware State University Eastern CT State University Hofstra University Iona College Johnson & Wales University Keene State College Lincoln College of New England Long Island University Manchester Community College Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts Mercy College Pace University Pine Manor College Porter & Chester Trade School Quinnipiac University Rhode Island College Rivier College Sacred Heart University Southern CT State University Southern New Hampshire University SUNY Binghamton College SUNY Plattsburgh SUNY Potsdam SUNY Stony Brook Syracuse University Trinity College Tunxis Community College University of Bridgeport University of Connecticut University of New Haven University of Saint Joseph University of Valley Forge Wentworth Institute of Technology West Virginia State University West Virginia University Western New England University Capital Prep American International College Assumption Bay Path CCSU Clark Atlanta Curry Curry Collge Dean ECSU Fisher Fisher College Hofstra Hussin Johnson & Wales Lincoln College of NE Maryland Eastern Shore Mitchell Morehouse New England College Penn St Penn State Penn Tech Purdue Quinnipiac Rivier Univ SCSU Springfield Suffolk Syracuse UCONN UHART Umass-Amherst Univ of Bridgeport Univ of FL Univ of Maine Univ of New Hampshire Univ of New Haven Univ of Rhode Island Univ of St Joesph Univ of St Joseph Univ of Texas WCSU West VA State Univ Western New England Classical Magnet School American University Amherst College Anna Maria College Assumption College Becker College Bryant University Cedar Crest College Central CT.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Architecture Foundation Scholarships
    Connecticut Architecture Foundation Scholarships 2018 Louis Koushouris Yale School of Architecture Alison M. Notation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Alix Marie-Louise Pauchet Yale School of Architecture Nabila Shahid Ahmed University of Hartford Sarah Freja Morsches Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Thomas Eugwong Lee Roger Williams University Xiaohui Wen Yale School of Architecture 2017 Dimitri Brand Maryland Institute College of Art in Interdisciplinary Sculpture Adam Meis Yale School of Architecture Alisa Yu Tiong Cornell University Timothy Applebee University of Hartford Chae Yeon Park Cornell University Alexandra Thompson Yale School of Architecture 2016 Amanda Baker University of Pennsylvania Alyssa Danielewicz Roger Williams University John Daniels Virginia Polytechnic Institute Robert Diaz Rhode Island School of Design Katrina Franzen Stephen Cornell University Smith Columbia University 2015 Amanda Baker University of Pennsylvania Graham Nelson University of Pennsylvania Sarah Payton University of Oregon Alisa Tiong Cornell University Alexandra Thompson Yale University, School of Architecture Joseph Tracy University of Hartford 2014 Emily Anderson University of Hartford Nicholas Fucci University of Hartford Ersa Llakmani University of Hartford Lilian Matos University of Hartford Damian Roman University of Hartford Christina Strid Wentworth Institute of Technology Namrata Taranekar University of Hartford Kayla Verbitsky Eugenia University of Hartford Kelsy Wisniewski University of Hartford 2013 Ersa Llakmani University of Hartford
    [Show full text]
  • Revenue Ratchet Connecticut’S Income Tax at 30
    MARCH 2021 Revenue Ratchet Connecticut’s Income Tax At 30 Ken Girardin Ken Girardin Ken Girardin is the Director of Policy and Research for Yankee Institute. He is a graduate of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in Troy, New York. The author thanks Meghan Portfolio for her assistance in the research for this paper and E.J. McMahon for his tax-policy mentorship. REVENUE RATCHET | Connecticut’s INCOME TAX at 30 Executive Summary Three decades have passed since the historic budget crisis Instead, the state has faced multiple sudden drops in tax that culminated in the creation of Connecticut’s personal revenues—and responded by hiking income tax rates income tax. further, making the state increasingly dependent on volatile investment income. This cycle has had a ratcheting The tax was enacted out of desperation: a roaring private effect on state tax revenues—and left Connecticut more sector buoyed a multi-year explosion in state spending, reliant on income tax revenues than all but two states. which left state government deep in the red as the economy slowed and tax revenues sank. Key decisions in subsequent years—after Weicker left office—allowed the tax to assume its current form, as Supporters eyed the income tax as a way to make the state’s the tax was first split into multiple brackets and the top tax system less regressive—and to expand the size and rate was increased on a permanent basis. Those changes scope of state government. And what began in 1991 under have exacerbated the volatility by making the state more Governor Lowell Weicker as a flat 4.5 percent tax on reliant on taxing investment income, such as capital gains, personal income has morphed into a seven-bracket tax as opposed to salaries and wages.
    [Show full text]
  • Going Nuts in the Nutmeg State?
    Going Nuts in the Nutmeg State? A Thesis Presented to The Division of History and Social Sciences Reed College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts Daniel Krantz Toffey May 2007 Approved for the Division (Political Science) Paul Gronke Acknowledgements Acknowledgements make me a bit uneasy, considering that nothing is done in isolation, and that there are no doubt dozens—perhaps hundreds—of people responsible for instilling within me the capability and fortitude to complete this thesis. Nonetheless, there are a few people that stand out as having a direct and substantial impact, and those few deserve to be acknowledged. First and foremost, I thank my parents for giving me the incredible opportunity to attend Reed, even in the face of staggering tuition, and an uncertain future—your generosity knows no bounds (I think this thesis comes out to about $1,000 a page.) I’d also like to thank my academic and thesis advisor, Paul Gronke, for orienting me towards new horizons of academic inquiry, and for the occasional swift kick in the pants when I needed it. In addition, my first reader, Tamara Metz was responsible for pulling my head out of the data, and helping me to consider the “big picture” of what I was attempting to accomplish. I also owe a debt of gratitude to the Charles McKinley Fund for providing access to the Cooperative Congressional Elections Study, which added considerable depth to my analyses, and to the Fautz-Ducey Public Policy fellowship, which made possible the opportunity that inspired this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut State University System 39 Woodland Street • Hartford, CT 06105-2337 • 860-493-0000 •
    Connecticut State University System 39 Woodland Street • Hartford, CT 06105-2337 • 860-493-0000 • www.ctstateu.edu RESOLUTION BR# 11-16 Awarding the Title of CHAIRMAN EMERITUS to Karl J. Krapek April 7, 2011 Whereas, Karl J. Krapek has served on the Board of Trustees for the Connecticut State University System selflessly, honorably and with distinction from 1995 through 2011, having fIrSt appointed to the Board by Governor Lowell Weicker, and reappointed by Governor John Rowland and Governor M. Jodi Rell; and Whereas, Karl J. Krapek was named Chairman of the Board of Trustees for the Connecticut State University System in 2010 by Governor M. Jodi Rell; and Whereas, during Chairman Krapek's tenure as a trustee and Chairman of the Board, the Connecticut State University System saw record full-time enrollment, increasing graduation and retention rates, increasing transfers from community colleges, increased levels of fmancial aid, narrowing achievement gaps and greater minority representation. Those years included innovative academic programs initiated, including the System's first Ed.D., greater coordination and collaboration with the business community, including the establishment of engineering programs at Central in direct response to expressed industry needs; and unprecedented outreach to local communities. Therefore, be it resolved that the Board of Trustees for the Connecticut State University System extends its deepest appreciation, heartfelt thanks and best wishes to Chairman Krapek at this time and for years to come; and be it further Resolved, That the Board of Trustees for the Connecticut State University System hereby confers upon Karl J. Krapek the title, Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees for the Connecticut State University System, with all the privileges pertaining thereto, effective April 7,2011.
    [Show full text]
  • University Raised $15.6 Million in FY 07 a Year to Remember
    November 2007 Compiled and produced by the Institutional Advancement Donor Relations Office. Articles are reprints from University publications produced Building on Success during the last year. Year in Review - Highlights from the past year University Mission At the University of Hartford we provide a learning environment in which students may transform themselves intellectually, person- ally, and socially. We provide students with distinctive educational experiences that blend the feel of a small, residential college with an array of academic programs and opportunities characteristic of a large university. Through relationships with faculty and staff dedicated to teaching, scholarship, research, the arts, and civic engagement, every student may prepare for a lifetime of learning and for personal and professional success. University Raised A Year to Remember $15.6 Million in FY 07 Special points of interest: It gives me great pleasure to tell you about the exceptionally successful 2007 • President Harrison’s letter to the future fiscal year at the University of Hartford. • Commencement 2007 photos Thanks to your generosity, there was a significant increase in contributions. The • Deans’ messages amount raised was $15.6 million, 13.9% • Faculty and Staff news over the prior year and 39.2% over the year before. More than 8,700 alumni, • 2007 Anchor Awards faculty, staff, and friends participated. • Fall weekend Those of you who frequent the campus • Campus new and improved facilities have surely taken note of the stunning On Feb. 21, 1957, Gov. Abraham recent additions, including Hawk Hall, our • Hartford Hawks Ribicoff signed the bill granting a five-story, 208-bed residence for first- • Looking forward charter to the University of Hartford.
    [Show full text]
  • TTT Trifold Update 6-07.Pub
    Troops To Teachers …. CONNECTICUT The Troops To Teachers (TTT) Program was established to assist military personnel to transition from active duty or selected reserve CONSIDERING A CT Department of Education units to a teaching career. TEACHING CAREER? Bureau of Educator Standards and Eligible servicepersons can register with the Certification Troops To Teachers program, administered by www.sde.ct.gov the U. S. Department of Defense (DANTES) and Kathleen DeFelice U. S. Department of Education, for state teacher [email protected] certification referral and placement assistance. 860-713-6969 A national network of State Placement Offices has been established to help! • State Teacher Certification Requirements Certification training stipends (up to $5,000) and placement bonuses of up to $10,000 are tar- Teach…. • Application geted to military personnel who meet program • Endorsement Area Fact Sheets criteria with a three-year commitment to teach in Mentor…. • Guide to Approved Educator Preparation eligible public schools. A registration form can Programs in Connecticut Institutions be downloaded from the TTT website below. • Transcript Assessment Fee Waiver for TTT • Vocational Instructor Certification www.ProudToServeAgain.com (www.cttech.org) • Placement Opportunities/Vacancies (www.ctreap.org) (www.cea.org) Troops To Teachers …. CT Department of Higher Education NEW ENGLAND Alternate Route to Certification (ARC) www.ctdhe.org/arc • TTT Program Information and Registration Maria Davoodi • Military Service and Education Eligibility [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Hispanic-Serving Institutions (Hsis): 2019-20
    Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs): 2019-20 The mission of Excelencia in Education is to accelerate Latino student success in higher education. A critical group of institutions enrolling and graduating Latino students are Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs). Summary of the 2019-20 HSI List In the 1980s, leaders recognized a small set of institutions enrolled a large percentage of Latino students but had low levels of resources to educate these students. The classification of Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) formally recognized these institutions for capacity-building and other support. HSIs are defined as accredited, degree-granting public or private nonprofit institutions of higher education with 25% or more total undergraduate Hispanic full-time equivalent (FTE) student enrollment.1 In 2019-20, 569 institutions met the enrollment definition of HSIs. HSIs represent 18% of colleges/universities and enroll 67% of Latino undergraduates. The list of institutions identified as HSIs in this analysis is not intended to designate eligibility for any specific program; rather, the list is meant to assist in considering and analyzing the institutions that meet the basic legislative definition of a Hispanic-Serving Institution. The following list of HSIs was created using data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS).2 Location Sector State/Location # HSIs Sector # HSIs % HSIs California 175 Public, 2-year 235 41% Texas 100 Private not-for-profit, 4-year or above 169 30% Puerto Rico 64 Public, 4-year or above 150 26%
    [Show full text]
  • Joe Lieberman Poll
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 7, 2010 INTERVIEWS: DEAN DEBNAM 888-621-6988 / 919-880-4888 (serious media inquiries only please, other questions can be directed to Tom Jensen) QUESTIONS ABOUT THE POLL: TOM JENSEN 919-744-6312 Lieberman in Serious Trouble for 2012 Raleigh, N.C. – Joe Lieberman managed to leave his old party in 2006 after losing the Democratic primary to liberal insurgent Ned Lamont and still comfortably win re- election as an independent in a three-way contest. But after endorsing John McCain over Barack Obama in 2008, Connecticut voters may finally have had enough. Two-thirds of those likely to cast their ballots this fall are looking forward to voting Lieberman out of office in the next election—including 70% of Democrats, 61% of Republicans, and 63% of independents—while only a quarter are committed to re-electing him. When stacked against 5th District Congressman Chris Murphy as the Democratic candidate and two different Republicans, Lieberman fails to get more than 20% of the vote in a three-way or a third against just Murphy. Head-to-head, Murphy leads Lieberman, 47-33, winning independents 41-33, pulling 70% of Democrats, and holding Lieberman to 59% of Republicans. With Peter Schiff as the Republican nominee, Murphy gets 39% to Schiff’s 25% and Lieberman’s 19%. At 24%, Lieberman’s GOP support is less than half of Schiff’s, and Murphy still gets 14% of Republicans. Lieberman also earns only 18% of independents’ votes, and Murphy tops Schiff, 32-28. Outgoing Governor Jodi Rell would be a stronger GOP choice than Schiff, closing the Murphy advantage to 37-29 and bringing Lieberman down to 17%.
    [Show full text]