Records Sharpe Family

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Records Sharpe Family C S “ Enteredacco rding t o act o f Co ngres s ,in the year he o fii e o f he L ibr ri n o f b W . S H A R P E in t c t a a o n re y C , Q g s s , n o n a t W as hi gt . 0 0 0 c c t 0 . i A, 0 t o . 0 4 O . o Q o , ¢ t r a ns a c s . E S P E OT fo r and a laudable curio sity t o ’ kno w so mething o f o ne s ances try, are well ‘ ‘ rewarded when upo n due s earch they are fo und o f s uch varied s tatio n and interes t as are tho s e who s e reco rd is briefly given in t h fo l o in a es e l w g p g . mo n th s ce an s f the ar A bg e de nd t o Sh ps r in rk hi n an ere D r o f Bradfo d Y o s re, E gl d w . Jo h n Sharp A rchbis ho p o f Yo rk ; his s o n Thomas , r bo rn 1 6 93 , Archdeaco n of No rthumberland , and Gran v e h 1 n o f the rc eac famo us as av n ill S a p, s o A hd o n, h i g been t he principal pro mo ter o f t he abo litio n of s lavei y a s o f in t he Wes t Indies ; J mes Sharpe, Archbi h o p S t . i ' ' n re rn in B anfis hire in 1 61 8 and raham A d ws , bo ; Ab a a a e r Sh rp , famo us m thematician, bo rn at Littl H o to n t he mer an f h an c t he in1 6 51 . On A ic s ide o t e Atl ti s ame predilectio n fo r Theo lo gy s eem to attach to the f amue a am1 l nam We ere o n name R ev . S S r y e. h ly l h p ‘ f n m a r an o o o n f a R ev . o Bo s to , R ev . S l S h rp o M yl d, h an e ar o f s s o ur and R v ames . S ar D i l Sh p Mi i , e . J M p o f u ar na I n u e a ff n e was S o th C o li . q it di ere t fi ld Benn S harp o f Mis s o uri ,ando thers who will be men t i ned r a t r The o r is nc m e et uts i o he e f e . w k i o pl te, y p n co nvenient fo rm t he material which has been accumu fo r m ear u lating s o e y s , ho ping that in a fut re editio n at h th which is new lacki ng m ay be s upplied . T e preparatio n o f the f ollo wing pages has been facilitat ed re erence to the e f n har u s e by f Lif o D r. Jo h S p, p bli h d in Lo ndo n m 1 825 ; Life o f Granville S harp publis hed ’ ¢ in Lo ndo n m 1 828; Yo ung s Chro nicles o f M as s achus ’ etts ; Winth ro p s New E ngland ; Co lo nial R ecords o f C o nnecticut ; General Dictio nary of N ew E ngland ; Geneo logical Jo urnal ; vario us To wn and Pro b ate R eco r s am R eco r s etc The am name has d ; F ily d , . f ily ” een s e e e t er o r o u t he “ e acco n “ b p ll d i h _ with with t rdi g to t he cus o m o f eac n a r t h i dividu l refe red to . m Thomas andSa uel Sharpeof Bos ton. rn i 1 Tho m as S harp e, bo n E ngland 580, t c he n ‘ was appo inted as s is tant o Endi ott,t ew Go verno r ' n 1 2 H e s a e r m n o f Mas s achus etts , i 6 9. il d f o Lo ndo o n t he Arabella in t he fleet with Wins hipfiaand was pres ent at t he co urt held o n the Arabella March 23rd, e as the s mem er o f the H w os n . 1 629. ixth b B to Church ' H e filled his oflice o f As s is tant t o the Go vernor, as it w as then termed , and member of the Co uncil of Mas s achus etts C o lony wit ho ut interruptio n until pers o nal mis fo r t unes caus ed him t o lo ng t o return t o t he land o f v his nati ity . his Thes e were the death o f daughter, January 30t h, 1 and' t he urn n o f is o s e arch1 t h 1 63 , b i g h h u M 7 by the Indians H e embarked at S alem with S ir R ichard S alto ns tall h s andfamily o n board t e Lion Whelp , April l s t ,1 631 , n 30th andarrived in Lo ndo April . h S amuel S harp e s ailed fro m t e Hope, a reach in n in h t he Thames ,,j us t belo w Graves e d, t e GeorgeBo na h ar r of a s 1 ventura, and was t e be e dis p tche fro m “ 6 Ki ng , Charles I , t o the Mas s achus etts Co lony, contain v n co andhis o nc t . H e ing i ns tructio ns o Go E di tt C u il. “ n 3th 2 H e was u n arrived at S alem Ju e 1 , 1 6 9. R li g ” Elder of t he Church in S alem until his death in B oth Tho mas and S amuel Sharpe are frequently ’ ’ mentio ned in Winthro p s New England ,Yo ung s Chro n f ioles of Mas s achus etts , General Dictionary o N ew England,Genealogical Jo urnal ,85 0. 44 1 1 01 1 1 8SHARP . Thomas S harp o f Bradford , in the co unty of Yo rk married Do rothy,eldes t daughter of M r. Joh n Weddal ’ of Widdingto n, a yo unger branch of the Weddal s of mo was a a f ea o r . H er e u e Ears wick ,n r Y k th r d ght r o thefamily of the Cutts in C ambridges hire. H e was the second s o n of theowner of an es tate call edWoo dhous e, near Bradfo rd,being a younger branch of the S harps of Little Horton, in the s ame neighb hoo d $ amo ng whom there hadbeen kept up , not o nly a succes s ion of Thomas andJohn alternately fo r many generatio ns ,but,what was much mo re for their credit,a t aste fo r letters andpo lite studies , for there were s ome amo ng them who were cons iderablefor their writings ,ia s omuch that,it was s aid to berareto meet with s o many o f t h ea a e l rned utho rs s o nearly allied . ’ The family of the S harp s hadbeen very ancient in Bradfo rdale but all thewritings ( except someregis ters) by which any further kno wledge of them might have been gained,werelo s t o r destro yed at thetaking of Brad o n t . f rd ,i he civil wars . 6 H e Was not a little inclined t o puritanis m acco rding m t o t he te per of tho s e times ,andmuch favo red the p ar iam nt a t H e as in r a av ht he r l e p r y . w g e t f o r wit Lo d is Fairfax , who m ade his headquarters at h ho us e in ra o r ands o e him all the n nes s and him B df d , h w d ki d , did all t he s erv c a h c u mo n o er e res s o ns i e th t e o ld . A g th xp i o f his favo r,his lords hip offered him a commis s io n,which probably he had accepted , hadno t his wife who was a enu u r a s a f r a him s tr o s oy li t , with gre t di ficulty pe s u ded n t ac ur n es e rou us mes was ot o cept it .
Recommended publications
  • Fulham Doctors of the Past *
    FULHAM DOCTORS OF THE PAST * by A. L. WYMAN ORIGINALLY the manor of Fulham comprised both Fulham and Hammersmith but even early in the seventeenth century there was a Fulham side and a Hammersmith side, and the accounts were rendered separately. It was a village near London, situated on the Thames where the river was fordable and the gravelly soil suitable for an early settlement. This was the town where the church was built and the ferry plied to Putney. There were hamlets at Parsons Green and Walham Green and smaller ones at North End and Sands End. It was pleasant enough and convenient enough for London to attract the upper classes. The population was about 730 in the time ofEdward VI (1547/8) and over 2,000 towards the end ofthe seventeenth century. This would be in a population in England of about four million and in London of between 100,000-200,000 (1600). In Roque's map of 1813 we find much the same general pattern. The community was primarily a rural one, with employment on the land as husbandmen, gardeners, labourers, or on the river as fisherman and watermen. As late as 1801 the census shows more people engaged in agricultural pursuits than in trade. When we come to the doctors it is necessary to make a broad distinction between those who are associated with Fulham because they lived or died there and those who worked there. Some of the former were illustrious but for the most part their main activities were elsewhere and they did not provide any kind of medical service to the local inhabitants, as did the more obscure practitioners who lived and worked in the parish.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK LONDON Life Before Emancipation
    BLACK LONDON Life before Emancipation ^^^^k iff'/J9^l BHv^MMiai>'^ii,k'' 5-- d^fli BP* ^B Br mL ^^ " ^B H N^ ^1 J '' j^' • 1 • GRETCHEN HOLBROOK GERZINA BLACK LONDON Other books by the author Carrington: A Life BLACK LONDON Life before Emancipation Gretchen Gerzina dartmouth college library Hanover Dartmouth College Library https://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/digital/publishing/ © 1995 Gretchen Holbrook Gerzina All rights reserved First published in the United States in 1995 by Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey First published in Great Britain in 1995 by John Murray (Publishers) Ltd. The Library of Congress cataloged the paperback edition as: Gerzina, Gretchen. Black London: life before emancipation / Gretchen Holbrook Gerzina p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index ISBN 0-8135-2259-5 (alk. paper) 1. Blacks—England—London—History—18th century. 2. Africans— England—London—History—18th century. 3. London (England)— History—18th century. I. title. DA676.9.B55G47 1995 305.896´0421´09033—dc20 95-33060 CIP To Pat Kaufman and John Stathatos Contents Illustrations ix Acknowledgements xi 1. Paupers and Princes: Repainting the Picture of Eighteenth-Century England 1 2. High Life below Stairs 29 3. What about Women? 68 4. Sharp and Mansfield: Slavery in the Courts 90 5. The Black Poor 133 6. The End of English Slavery 165 Notes 205 Bibliography 227 Index Illustrations (between pages 116 and 111) 1. 'Heyday! is this my daughter Anne'. S.H. Grimm, del. Pub­ lished 14 June 1771 in Drolleries, p. 6. Courtesy of the Print Collection, Lewis Walpole Library, Yale University. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moneyers of the Tower of London and William Lord Hastings in 1472
    The Moneyers of the Tower of London and William Lord Hastings in 1472 JESSICA FREEMAN In the summer of 1472 Edward IV, who had only recently regained his throne, felt secure enough to call his first Parliament for four years, to meet at Westminster on 6 October.1 Yet, judging by the parliamentary indenture for Middlesex, there was perhaps a lingering doubt as to the ‘correct’, that is Yorkist, composition of the forthcoming Parliament. For at this particular county election, held at Stone Cross in the Strand on Thursday 27 August, there was, among the parliamentary attestors, a group of moneyers, or coiners to use the term they themselves preferred. They worked at the royal mint in the Tower of London, but lived in and around Shoreditch, just to the north of London and then a Middlesex parish. Parliamentary attestors were the forty shilling freeholders who were entitled to attend the hustings and elect the two knights to represent them in the House of Commons, and who then attested to the validity of the election through an indenture returned into Chancery. That there were moneyers among these attestors was unusual because, as crown servants, those working at the Tower were freed from the burden of service as jurors at the county court, and are thus seldom found attending the hustings. But on this occasion, out of a total of forty-eight known attestors, eleven men (23%) can be identified as moneyers.2 The appearance of moneyers at this specific election can probably be explained by the political situation, which provides an interesting insight into the relations that existed between moneyers, the master-worker of the Mint, and the king.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharpe Genealogy
    SHARPE GENEALOGY AND MISCELLANY. !Jy w. G. SHfiJ:r.r:PEI Author of the "HISTORY OF SEYMOUR." RECORD PBDCT, 8E'fll0tm. COD. 1880. Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the ye.v 1880, by W. C. SHARPE, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress. at Washington. COAT OF ARMS OF THE SHARPS OF HORTO:N. PREFACE. The following collection was commenced a11 a work for leisure hours, in collecting and for odd days in the printing room. As the work progressed the mate­ rial accnruulated beyond the compiler's most sanguine expectations, and the defects of arrangement which have re11ulted have in part been remedied by the table of" contents and by the completeness of the index at the close of the volume. Jiearty thanks are ten­ dered to all who have so freely and readily assisted in the collection. fhe compiler is especially indebted for valuable assistance to Miss Thomasin Elizabeth Sharpe, of Kensington, E11g., to Lucian Sharpe, Esq., of the firm of Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., Provi­ dence, R. I., to L. N. Sharp, M. D., of Woodstock, N. B.; anu to Richard Sharpe, Esq., of Wilkesbarre, Penn. CONTENTS. Origin of the Name, ••••••••••.•..•••••.•••.•••••••.•••..•••••• Page 73 Coata of Arms, Frontispiece, .•.•.•••....••.•..••.••••••.••••.. 35-41, 79 Families of Dot.ch and German Descent, ....•..•..•.••. 33, 34, 68-i2, 109 John Sharp,.Archbishop of York, andFamily, .......•.... 5-14, 75-80, 90 Other English Genealogies and Notes, .•••••....•....•••.•. as, 47, 69, 155 Families of Scot.ch Descent, ••••.....•.•..••..••.•..•..•.. 96, 97, 104, 137 Descendants of:Robert Sharp, of Brookline, .••••••••.••••••• 115-136, 160 Descendants of Thomas Sharp, of Stratford, ..•••.•••••• 17-27, 63-66, 67 New Brunswick Families, •••.••..•..•••••••••.•..•••••• 105-108, 140-146 New Jersey Families, .••••••••••...•...••••..•.•.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Tree Maker, CD Vol 1-1637
    Sharp/Reece Ancestry 40 Generations to Charlemagne Generation No. 1 1. Mary Virginia Sharp, born August 31, 1895 in Roadstown, NJ; died September 1984 in Carlisle, PA. She was the daughter of 2. Ezra Bradway* Sharp and 3. Ruth Ella Reece. She married (1) Frank E.* Masland II 1918 in Trinity United Methodist Church, Mullica Hill, NJ. He was born December 08, 1895 in Philadelphia, PA, and died July 30, 1994 in Carlisle, PA. He was the son of Frank Elmer Masland and Mary Esther Gossler. More About Mary Virginia Sharp: Burial: Carlisle, PA Notes for Frank E.* Masland II: [Master File.ftw] Masland preserved jobs and nature By John Hilton Sentinel Reporter Frank E. Masland Jr. was an adventurer, an astute businessman, a devoted husband and father and a noted philanthropist. But most of all, he was squarely focused on the success of C.H. Masland & Sons in Carlisle. Frank Masland in 1948 Masland was the driving force behind the company for 52 years, helping establish it as a national player in the carpet business and a major employer in Cumberland County. "He didn't let anything interfere with the success of the business," says his son, Frank E. "Mike" Masland III of Carlisle. Born Dec. 8, 1895, in Philadelphia, Masland was one of four sons of the late Frank E. and Mary Esther Gossler Masland. He became acquainted with Carlisle when he attended Dickinson College. His college days, however, were interrupted by World War I, and Masland was a Navy ensign "subchaser" seeking out German U-boats, his son says.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoffany and the Conversation Piece
    The Conversation Piece • In the eighteenth century aristocratic society dedicated itself to pleasure. It was permissive and gossiped about all forms of love and hardly anything shocked them except, perhaps, for a wealthy woman to marry a lower-class man. The conversation piece became popular between about 1720 and 1780 as a symbol of the aristocratic life. It shows a group in conversation often in the open. The group is formally dressed yet relaxed and the environment they are in is a natural setting but rigidly presented. • The essential requirement of an eighteenth century conversation piece is that ‘it should be the representation of two or more persons in a state of dramatic or psychological relation to each other’. • Where did the idea of the conversation piece first arise? Notes The Conversation Piece • Wikipedia (modified): The conversation piece was influenced by 17th century portraiture in the Low Countries including merrymaking companies and garden parties painted by artists such as Dirck Hals and David Vinckbooms. In addition, representations of elegant companies and balls by Hieronymus Janssens and the works of Peter Paul Rubens, in particular his Garden of Love (Prado Museum), gave an impetus and direction to the development of the genre. In this last work, Rubens showed how a garden could be used as a setting for amorous dalliance and courtship. • In the Low Countries many group portraits were painted, both of family groups and groups such as Governors or Regents of institutions, or militia officers. Frans Hals, Rembrandt and other artists had adopted a variety of poses to liven up the group portrait, for example the famous Night Watch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moneyers of the Tower of London and William Lord Hastings in 1472
    The Moneyers of the Tower of London and William Lord Hastings in 1472 JESSICA FREEMAN In the summerof 1472 Edward IV, who had only recently regained his throne, felt secure enough to call his first Parliament for fouryears, to meet at Westminster on 6 October.‘Yet, judging by the parliamentary indenture for Middlesex, there was perhaps a lingering doubt as to the ‘correct’,that is Yorkist, composition of the forthcoming Parliament. For at this particular county election, held at Stone Cross in the Strand on Thursday 27 August, there was, among the parliamentary attestors,a group of moneyers, or coinets to use the term they themselves preferred. They worked at the royal mint in the Tower of London, but lived in and around Shoreditch, just to the north of London and then a Middlesex parish. Parliamentary attestors were the forty shilling freeholders who were entitled to attend the hustings and elect the two knights to represent them in the House of Commons, and who then attested to the validityof the election through an indenture returned into Chancery. That thexe were moneyers among these attestors was unusual because, as crown servants, those working at the Tower were freed from the burden of service asjurorsat the county court, and are thus seldom found attending the hustings. But on this occasion, out of a total of forty- eight known attestors, eleven men (23%) can be identified as moneym's.2 The appearance of moneyers at this specific election can probably be explained by the political situation, which provides an interestinginsight into the relations that existed between moneycrs, the master-worker of the Mint, and the king.
    [Show full text]
  • Fulham Doctors of the Past *
    FULHAM DOCTORS OF THE PAST * by A. L. WYMAN ORIGINALLY the manor of Fulham comprised both Fulham and Hammersmith but even early in the seventeenth century there was a Fulham side and a Hammersmith side, and the accounts were rendered separately. It was a village near London, situated on the Thames where the river was fordable and the gravelly soil suitable for an early settlement. This was the town where the church was built and the ferry plied to Putney. There were hamlets at Parsons Green and Walham Green and smaller ones at North End and Sands End. It was pleasant enough and convenient enough for London to attract the upper classes. The population was about 730 in the time ofEdward VI (1547/8) and over 2,000 towards the end ofthe seventeenth century. This would be in a population in England of about four million and in London of between 100,000-200,000 (1600). In Roque's map of 1813 we find much the same general pattern. The community was primarily a rural one, with employment on the land as husbandmen, gardeners, labourers, or on the river as fisherman and watermen. As late as 1801 the census shows more people engaged in agricultural pursuits than in trade. When we come to the doctors it is necessary to make a broad distinction between those who are associated with Fulham because they lived or died there and those who worked there. Some of the former were illustrious but for the most part their main activities were elsewhere and they did not provide any kind of medical service to the local inhabitants, as did the more obscure practitioners who lived and worked in the parish.
    [Show full text]
  • Dec. 11 Program Layout 1
    The Smithsonian American Art Museum Presents 21st CENTURY CONSORT December 3, 2011 Nan Tucker McEvoy Auditorium, Smithsonian American Art Museum The Smithsonian American Art Museum The Smithsonian American Art Museum presents presents 21st Century Consort Pre-Concert Discussion Christopher Kendall, Artistic Director Christopher Kendall with William Sharp Boyd Sarratt, Manager Elisabeth Adkins, Violin Program Richard Barber, Double Bass “…Hall of Wonders” Paul Cigan, Clarinet Lisa Emenheiser, Piano Piano Trio Nicholas Maw Abigail Evans, Viola I. Moderator con moto, in poco inquieto; Presto non assai Laurel Ohlson, Horn II. Grave e sostenuto; Allegro comodo Susan Robinson, Harp Ms. Adkins, Ms. Emenheiser, Ms. Young William Sharp, Baritone Sara Stern, Flute INTERMISSION Jane Stewart, Violin Danny Villanueva, Percussion The Passion of Scrooge or A Christmas Carol Jon Deak Rachel Young, Cello Act I Act II Mark Huffman, Recording Engineer Ms. Adkins, Mr. Barber, Mr Cigan, Ms. Evans, Mr. Kendall, Ms. Ohlson, Mark Wakefield, Stage Manager Ms. Robinson, Mr. Sharp, Ms. Stern, Ms. Stewart, Mr. Villanueva, Ms. Young Saturday, December 3, 2011 ❖ ❖ ❖ Pre-Concert Discussion 4:00 p.m. Concert 5:00 p.m. The audience is invited to join the artists in the lobby for an Nan Tucker McEvoy Auditorium informal post-concert reception, sponsored by the Smithsonian American Art Museum Board and Friends of the 21st Century Consort. ❖ ❖ ❖ The 21st Century Consort’s 2011–2012 Season is sponsored by The Smithsonian American Art Museum and funded in part by generous grants from the Cafritz Foundation and the Copland Foundation, and contributions from the Board and Friends of the 21st Century Consort. Glyndebourne, and the overpowering Sophie’s Choice, premiered at Program Notes and Texts Covent Garden.
    [Show full text]