Devonian Horn River Group: a Reference Section

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Devonian Horn River Group: a Reference Section NWT Open File 2014-06 Devonian Horn River Group: A Reference Section, Lithogeochemical Characterization, Correlation of Measured Sections and Wells, and Petroleum-Potential Data, Mackenzie Plain area (NTS 95M, 95N, 96C, 96D, 96E, 106H, and 106I), NWT L.J. Pyle1, L.P. Gal2, and K.M. Fiess3 1 VI Geoscience Services Brentwood Bay, BC V8M 1J8 250.652.4076 [email protected] www.vigeoscience.com 2 consultant Courtenay, BC V9J 1T6 250.334.4666 3 Northwest Territories Geoscience Office Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 867.765.6603 Recommended Citation: Pyle, L.J., Gal, L.P., and Fiess, K.M., 2014. Devonian Horn River Group: A Reference Section, Lithogeochemical Characterization, Correlation of Measured Sections and Wells, and Petroleum-Potential Data, Mackenzie Plain area (NTS 95M, 95N, 96C, 96D, 96E, 106H, and 106I), NWT; Northwest Territories Geoscience Office, NWT Open File 2014-06, 70 p. Horn River Group in Mackenzie Plain 1 Contents Devonian Horn River Group: A Reference Section, Lithogeochemical Characterization, Correlation of Measured Sections and Wells, and Petroleum-Potential Data, Mackenzie Plain area (NTS 95M, 95N, 96C, 96D, 96E, 106H, and 106I), NWT ..................................................... 1 List of Figure Captions ................................................................................................................... 5 List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 15 Foreword: Project Rationale ......................................................................................................... 16 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 16 Location and Regional Geology ................................................................................................... 17 Methods......................................................................................................................................... 18 Outcrop ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Exploration Wells ..................................................................................................................... 21 Horn River Nomenclature Review................................................................................................ 21 Horn River Group Outcrop and Reference Sections..................................................................... 22 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 22 Hare Indian Formation .............................................................................................................. 23 Definition and New Reference Section ................................................................................. 23 Distribution and Thickness ................................................................................................... 24 Lithology ............................................................................................................................... 24 Contacts................................................................................................................................. 24 Age ........................................................................................................................................ 24 Bluefish Member ...................................................................................................................... 24 Definition and Reference Section ......................................................................................... 24 Distribution and Thickness ................................................................................................... 24 Lithology ............................................................................................................................... 25 Contacts................................................................................................................................. 25 Age ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Bell Creek member (new, informal) ......................................................................................... 25 Definition and Reference Sections........................................................................................ 25 Distribution and Thickness ................................................................................................... 26 Lithology ............................................................................................................................... 26 Contacts................................................................................................................................. 26 Age ........................................................................................................................................ 26 Ramparts Formation and its Carcajou member ........................................................................ 27 Definition .............................................................................................................................. 27 Distribution and Thickness ................................................................................................... 27 Lithology ............................................................................................................................... 27 Contacts................................................................................................................................. 27 Age ........................................................................................................................................ 27 Canol Formation ....................................................................................................................... 28 Definition .............................................................................................................................. 28 Distribution and Thickness ................................................................................................... 28 Lithology ............................................................................................................................... 28 Horn River Group in Mackenzie Plain 2 Contacts................................................................................................................................. 28 Age ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Lithogeochemistry and Mineralogical Studies of Outcrop ........................................................... 29 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 29 Lithogeochemical Characterization of the Reference Section .................................................. 29 Organic Richness (TOC, U, gamma radiation) ..................................................................... 29 Silica (SiO2) .......................................................................................................................... 30 Terrigenous Input .................................................................................................................. 30 Calcium Oxide (CaO) ........................................................................................................... 30 Paleoredox Indicators: Enrichment Factor of Vanadium (EFV), Molybdenum (Mo), and Nickel/Cobalt (Ni/Co) Ratio ................................................................................................. 31 Lithogeochemical Characterization of Horn River Units Regionally from Outcrop Data ....... 31 Bluefish Member .................................................................................................................. 32 “Typical” Bell Creek member .............................................................................................. 33 “Atypical” Bell Creek member ............................................................................................. 33 Ramparts Formation.............................................................................................................. 34 Canol Formation ................................................................................................................... 34 Distinctive Geochemical Characteristics of Horn River Units ............................................. 35 Mineralogical Analyses from Outcrop Sections ....................................................................... 36 Mountain River Tributary Section (the Reference Section) ................................................. 36 Powell Creek Section (Type Section of the Canol Formation)............................................. 37 Other Sections ....................................................................................................................... 37 Importance of Mineralogical Characterization: MacKay Range West Section .................... 38 Distinctive Mineralogical Characteristics of Horn River Units ............................................ 38 Source Rock Quality and Maturity from Outcrop Samples .........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Calcium Isotopic Variation in Marine Evaporites and Carbonates: Applications To
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Calcium Isotopic Variation in Marine Evaporites and Carbonates: Applications to Late Miocene Mediterranean Brine Chemistry and Late Cenozoic Calcium Cycling in the Oceans A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Earth Sciences by Tabitha Michele Hensley Committee in Charge: J. Douglas Macdougall, Chair Chris Charles Miriam Kastner Kurt Marti Jeff Severinghaus 2006 Copyright Tabitha Michele Hensley, 2006 All rights reserved ii The dissertation of Tabitha Michele Hensley is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2006 iii To my parents, Eddy and Brenda Hensley iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page …………………………………………………………………. iii Dedication ……………………………………………………………………… iv Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………. v List of Figures ………………………………………………………………….. vii List of Tables …………………………………………………………………… viii Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………….. ix Vita, Publications and Fields of Study …………………………………………. xi Abstract ………………………………………………………………………… xiii Chapter I Introduction and Ca Isotope Background ………………………….. 1 1.1 Introduction ………………………………………………………… 1 1.2 Calcium Isotope Notation and Common Standards ………………… 3 1.3 Double Spiking
    [Show full text]
  • Helium in Northeastern British Columbia
    HELIUM IN NORTHEASTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA Elizabeth G. Johnson1 ABSTRACT Global demand for helium is increasing at a time when world reserves are in decline. The price of grade A helium has quadrupled in the past 12 years. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing can be used to capture helium as a value-added byproduct at concentrations as low as 0.04% by volume. The Slave Point, Jean Marie (Redknife) and Wabamun formations of northeastern British Columbia preferentially have helium associated with many of their natural gas pools. The mechanism for this accumulation appears to be flow in hydrothermal brines from helium-enriched basement granitic rocks along deeply seated faults. Separately, the Evie member of the Horn River Formation also has anomalous helium accumulation in its shale gas related to uranium decay in organic-rich shales. Johnson, E.G. (2012): Helium in northeastern British Columbia; in Geoscience Reports 2013, British Columbia Ministry of Natural Gas Development, pages 45–52. 1Geoscience and Strategic Initiatives Branch, British Columbia Ministry of Natural Gas Development, Victoria, British Columbia; [email protected] Key Words: Helium, LNG, Jean Marie, Slave Point, Wabamun, Evie, Horn River Formation INTRODUCTION optical fibre technology (8% of global use; Peterson and Madrid, 2012; Anonymous, 2012). Helium is a nonrenewable resource that has developed In recognition of its strategic value, the United States important strategic value. Helium (atomic number of 2) ex- 4 created the Federal Helium Reserve in the Bush Dome Res- ists primarily as the stable isotope, He, which is produced ervoir, Texas, in 1925. The primary source for the Federal on the earth through alpha decay of radioactive elements Helium Reserve is the world-class Hugoton Reservoir in such as uranium and thorium.
    [Show full text]
  • Pa 62-15.Pdf
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA CANADA PAPER 62-15 MIDDLE DEVONIAN AND OLDER PALAEOZOIC FORMATIONS OF SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MACKENZIE AND ADJACENT AREAS B y Helen R. Belyea and A. W. Norris DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND TECHNICAL SURVEYS CANADA CONTENTS Page Introduction. • . • . • • . • • . • • . • • 1 Ordovician and older(?) . • . • . • • • • • . • . • 1 Old Fort Island Formation........................... 2 Mirage Point Formation ...•...•..•. ,................ 2 Pre-Chinchaga beds . • • • . • • . • . • • • • . • . • • . • 3 Middle Devonian • . • . • . • • . • . • . • . • • . • 3 Chinchaga Formation ..•.•.••.•........•.•••••. • . • • • 3 Keg River Formation . • . • . • . • . • . • • • . 4 Muskeg Formation.................................. 5 Pine Point Formation................. .............. 5 Lonely Bay Formation • . • • • • . • . • • • • . • • 9 Sulphur Point Formation . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • • . • • . • . 10 Presqu 1ile Formation............................... 11 Watt Mountain Formation. • . • • • • . • . • . • • • • • . • . • . 12 Slave Point Formation . • • . • • • . • • . • • • • • • . • • • 12 Horn River Formation . • . • • . • • . • • • . • . • 14 References.............................................. 16 Appendix-logs of wells . • • • . • • • • • • . • . • • . • • • • • . • • . 19 Illustrations Figure 1. Formational nomenclature ••......•... .. .....•. Frontispiec e 2. Correla tion diagram from Pan American et al. A-1 Snake River c-28-D well to Imperial Triad Davidson C reek P-2 well .. ... ... •. .... ... .. in pocket 3. Correlation
    [Show full text]
  • Us Department of the Interior
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Palynological Data from the Imperial and Palm Spring Formations, Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, California by R. Parley Fleming! U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 93-678 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 Denver, Colorado 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................3 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................3 Regional Geology and Stratigraphy ................................................................3 Materials and Methods ...............................................................................4 Age Control ...........................................................................................4 Pliocene Palynology .................................................................................7 Reworked Cretaceous Pollen .......................................................................7 Implications of Reworked Pollen for Pliocene Climate ..........................................8 Conclusions ...........................................................................................9 References ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical, Petrophysical and Geomechanical Properties Of
    Geochemical, petrophysical and geomechanical properties of stratigraphic sequences in Horn River Shale, Middle and Upper Devonian, Northeastern British Columbia, Canada by TIAN DONG A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Alberta © Tian Dong, 2016 ABSTRACT The Middle and Upper Devonian Horn River Shale, comprising the Evie and Otter Park members and the Muskwa Formation, northeast British Columbia, Canada is recognized as a significant shale gas reservoir in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. However, many aspects of this shale formation have not been adequately studied, and the published geochemical, petrophysical and geomechanical data are limited. This work aims to document the controls of geochemical composition variation on petrophysical and geomechanical properties and the relationship of rock composition to lithofacies and stratigraphic sequences. A detailed core-based sedimentological and wireline log analysis was conducted by my colleague Dr. Korhan Ayranci as a parallel study, in order to classify lithofacies, interpret depositional environments and establish sequence stratigraphic framework across the basin. Major and trace elements concentrations, key trace element ratios and Corg-Fe-S relationships were used to understand the effect of sea level fluctuation on detrital flux, redox conditions, productivity and therefore organic carbon enrichment patterns. Detrital sediment flux indicated by the concentration of aluminum and titanium to the basin was found to be higher during transgressions than regressions. Redox conditions, exhibiting strong correlation to TOC content, were the primary controls on the organic carbon deposition. The bottom water conditions are more anoxic during transgressions than regressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Exposures
    Searching for the Pliocene: Southern Exposures Robert E. Reynolds, editor California State University Desert Studies Center The 2012 Desert Research Symposium April 2012 Table of contents Searching for the Pliocene: Field trip guide to the southern exposures Field trip day 1 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Robert E. Reynolds, editor Field trip day 2 �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 19 George T. Jefferson, David Lynch, L. K. Murray, and R. E. Reynolds Basin thickness variations at the junction of the Eastern California Shear Zone and the San Bernardino Mountains, California: how thick could the Pliocene section be? ��������������������������������������������������������������� 31 Victoria Langenheim, Tammy L. Surko, Phillip A. Armstrong, Jonathan C. Matti The morphology and anatomy of a Miocene long-runout landslide, Old Dad Mountain, California: implications for rock avalanche mechanics �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 38 Kim M. Bishop The discovery of the California Blue Mine ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 44 Rick Kennedy Geomorphic evolution of the Morongo Valley, California ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45 Frank Jordan, Jr. New records
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 61-13 Camsell Bend and Root River Map-Areas
    PAPER 61-13 CAMSELL BEND AND ROOT RIVER MAP-AREAS, DISTRICT OF MACKENZIE, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 95Jand K (Report, 2 maps, 2 figures) R. J. W. Douglas and D. K. Norris DEC 5 1961 . _.. Price 50 cents 1961 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA CANADA PAPER 61-13 CAMSELL BEND AND ROOT RIVER MAP-AREAS, DISTRICT OF MACKENZIE, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 95 J,K By R. J. W. Douglas and D. K. Norris DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND TECHNICAL SURVEYS CANADA 51310-1 ROGER DUHAMEL, F. R. S. C. QUEEN'S PR INTER AND CONTROLLER OF STATIONERY OTTAWA, 1961 Pri ce 50 ce nts Cat. No. M44-6 1 11 CONTENTS Page Introduction .•••••••••••••••••••••• • • •••••••••••••••.••.•• References • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • 1 Physical features........ ................................ 3 Stratigraphy......... ....... .................... ......... 5 Table of formations • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • . • . • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • 8-9 Palaeozoic •.•• , .............................. • • • • • • 6 Ordovician and older {?) - Sunblood formation ( 1) • • • . • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . 6 Ordovician and younger - map-units 2-10, including the Whittaker (3), Delorme (4), Camsell (5), Mount Kindle (7), a nd Sombre (10) formations • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • • . • 7 Middle Devonian and older { ? ) - map-units 11-17, comprising the Arnica {11), Manetoe (12), Fune ral (13), Bear Rock (14), Landry (15), Headless (16), and Nahanni (17) formations....... 14 Upper Devonian - map-units 18-25, including
    [Show full text]
  • Shale Units of the Horn River Formation, Horn River Basin and Cordova Embayment, Northeastern British Columbia Sara Mcphail
    Shale units of the Horn River Formation, Horn River Basin and Cordova Embayment, Northeastern British Columbia Sara McPhail, Warren Walsh and Cassandra Lee British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Patrick A. Monahan, Monahan Petroleum Consulting/Penn West Energy Trust The Horn River Basin (HRB) and Cordova Embayment (CE) of northeastern British Columbia are bordered by the reef-fringed carbonate platforms of the Middle Devonian Upper Keg River, Sulphur Point, and Slave Point formations (Appendix A). Basinal shales laterally-equivalent to these carbonate units comprise the Evie, Otter Park, and Muskwa members of the Horn River Formation (Figure 1). These shales, particularly those of the Evie and Muskwa members that have high silica and organic contents are the target of a developing shale gas play. Figure 1: Middle and basal Upper Devonian units of the HRB and CE. basinal succession platform succession Fort Simpson Shale Muskwa Muskwa Upper Devonian Otter Park Slave Point Slave Pt/Sulphur Point basinal Middle Devonian equivalents Sulphur Point Evie Upper Keg River Lower Keg River Exploration activity for these shales in this lightly developed region has developed dramatically over the past two years (Adams et al, 2007). Total bonus paid for rights to the Horn River Shale exceeded $400 million in 2007. Experimental schemes, which allow an operator to hold well data confidential for 3 years, have been granted to several companies within the HRB and CE, and 48 wells have been licensed or drilled to test these targets since 2004 (Appendix A). Few results are available, but the recompletion of a vertical well in d-60-I/94-O-9 in the HRB resulted in a gas flow of 13 e3m3/, and EOG recently announced gas flow of 140 e3m3/d from their horizontal well in a-26-G/94-O-9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pyramidellidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from the Miocene Cantaure Formation of Venezuela
    Cainozoic Research, 15(1-2), pp. 13-54, October 2015 13 The Pyramidellidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from the Miocene Cantaure Formation of Venezuela Bernard M. Landau1, 3 & Patrick I. LaFollette2 1 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands; Instituto Dom Luiz da Universi- dade de Lisboa, Portugal and International Health Centres, Av. Infante de Henrique 7, Areias São João, P-8200-261 Albufeira, Portugal; [email protected] 2 Research Associate, Malacology Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boul- evard, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.; [email protected] 3 corresponding author Received 18 June 2015, revised version accepted 15 July 2015 The Pyramidellidae Gray, 1840 present in the upper Burdigalian-lower Langhian, Lower-Middle Miocene, Cantaure Formation assemblage of Venezuela is described and discussed. Twenty-one species are recognised: 13 are described as new: Brachystomia cantaurana nov. sp., Goniodostomia bicarinata nov. sp., Iolaea miocenica nov. sp., Chrysallida cantaurana nov. sp., Kleinella pumila nov. sp., Parthenina martae nov. sp., Ividella guppyi nov. sp., Chemnitzia macsotayi nov. sp., Turbonilla paraguanensis nov. sp., Pyrgiscus caribbaeus nov. sp., Pyrgiscus silvai nov. sp., Eulimella dianeae nov. sp. and Iselica belliata nov. sp., three are left in open nomenclature. The state of knowledge of tropical American Neogene pyramidellids is rudimentary, but the assemblage is fairly typical at generic level to that of the tropical American Neogene today, with some species suggesting closer affinities with tropical American Pacific taxa. KEY WORDS: Pyramidellidae, Miocene, Cantaure, Venezuela, new species. Introduction Pyramidellidae. Of these projects, only Bartsch’s 1955 ‘The pyramidellid mollusks of the Pliocene deposits of Despite the enormous amount of research done by the North St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Reconnaissance Field Program in Peel Plateau and Peel Plain Region, Northwest Territories and Yukon Territory
    Geological Survey of Canada CURRENT RESEARCH 2006-A6 2005 reconnaissance field program in Peel Plateau and Peel Plain region, Northwest Territories and Yukon Territory L.J. Pyle, A.L. Jones, L.P. Gal, J.G. Abbott, A.D. McCracken, M.G. Fowler, and L.D. Stasiuk 2006 CURRENT RESEARCH Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Canada Canada ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2006 ISSN 1701-4387 Catalogue No. M44-2006/A6E-PDF ISBN 0-662-43400-5 A copy of this publication is also available for reference by depository libraries across Canada through access to the Depository Services Program's Web site at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca A free digital download of this publication is available from GeoPub: http://geopub.nrcan.gc.ca/index_e.php Toll-free (Canada and U.S.A.): 1-888-252-4301 Critical reviewer Yvon Lemieux Authors’ addresses L.J. Pyle ([email protected]) J.G. Abbott ([email protected]) GSC Pacific (Sidney), Yukon Geological Survey, 9860 West Saanich Road, P.O. Box 2703 (K-10), Sidney, British Columbia V8L 3S1 Whitehorse, Yukon Territory Y1A 2C6 A.L. Jones ([email protected]) A.D. McCracken ([email protected]) L.P. Gal ([email protected]) M.G. Fowler ([email protected]) Northwest Territories Geoscience Office, L.D. Stasiuk ([email protected]) P.O. Box 1500, GSC Calgary, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories X1A 2R3 3303-33 Street NW, Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7 Publication approved by GSC Pacific Original manuscript submitted: 2006-02-20 Final version approved for publication: 2006-03-01 Correction date: All requests for permission to reproduce this work, in whole or in part, for purposes of commercial use, resale, or redistribution shall be addressed to: Earth Sciences Sector Information Division, Room 402, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8.
    [Show full text]
  • Horn River Basin Aquifer Characterization Project Phase 2 Geological Report
    HORN RIVER BASIN AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION PROJECT PHASE 2 GEOLOGICAL REPORT Prepared for: HORN RIVER BASIN PRODUCERS GROUP GEOSCIENCE B.C. September, 2011 Petrel Robertson Consulting Ltd. 500, 736 – 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 1H4 www.petrelrob.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Geoscience BC‟s Phase 1 Horn River Basin Aquifer Characterization Project (PRCL, 2010) concluded that the Mississippian Debolt-Rundle carbonate platform demonstrates the best potential to act as a productive water source and sink for the completions activities of producers in the Horn River Basin. Phase 2 of the study reinforces this conclusion and adds data from new wells drilled since completion of the Phase 1 report. Resulting map revisions increase the overall enhanced reservoir volume, particularly in the centre of the basin, where well control had been sparse. The Debolt-Rundle carbonate platform has been subdivided into four units that are mappable across the basin: the lower, middle and upper Rundle, capped by the Debolt. At the top of the upper Rundle and Debolt, reservoir quality is enhanced by leaching and dolomitization beneath the pre-Cretaceous unconformity, forming a unit referred to as the “Detrital Zone”. The highest-quality and most continuous water-bearing reservoirs thus occur within the upper Rundle and Debolt where they subcrop beneath the pre-Cretaceous unconformity in the eastern part of the Horn River Basin. Reservoir quality mapping was focused on the Debolt-Rundle succession. Net porous reservoir and porosity-thickness maps from the Phase 1 study were updated using sample cuttings observations and well logs from Phase 2 wells. As in Phase 1, approximations regarding reservoir quality had to be applied because of the highly heterogeneous nature of the “Detrital Zone”.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Paleontology of the Late Miocene Wilson Grove Formation at Bloomfield Quarry, Sonoma County, California
    Geology and Paleontology of the Late Miocene Wilson Grove Formation at Bloomfield Quarry, Sonoma County, California 2 cm 2 cm Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5021 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER. Photographs of fragments of a walrus (Gomphotaria pugnax Barnes and Raschke, 1991) mandible from the basal Wilson Grove Formation exposed in Bloomfield Quarry, just north of the town of Bloomfield in Sonoma County, California (see plate 8 for more details). The walrus fauna at Bloomfield Quarry is the most diverse assemblage of walrus yet reported worldwide from a single locality. cm, centimeter. (Photographs by Robert Boessenecker, College of Charleston.) Geology and Paleontology of the Late Miocene Wilson Grove Formation at Bloomfield Quarry, Sonoma County, California By Charles L. Powell II, Robert W. Boessenecker, N. Adam Smith, Robert J. Fleck, Sandra J. Carlson, James R. Allen, Douglas J. Long, Andrei M. Sarna-Wojcicki, and Raj B. Guruswami-Naidu Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5021 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]