Species Limits in the Genus Gerrhonotus (Squamata: Anguidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Species Limits in the Genus Gerrhonotus (Squamata: Anguidae) Species Limits in the Genus Gerrhonotus (Squamata: Anguidae) David A. Good Herpetological Monographs, Vol. 8. (1994), pp. 180-202. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0733-1347%281994%298%3C180%3ASLITGG%3E2.0.CO%3B2-8 Herpetological Monographs is currently published by Herpetologists' League. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/herpetologists.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Wed Dec 12 18:51:01 2007 180 HERPETOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS [No.8 duction by Uta stansburiana (Reptilia, Lacertilia, parative life histories of two syntopic sceloporine Iguanidae) in southern Nevada. J. Herpetol. 10: lizards. Copeia 1986:l-18. 123-128. TINKLE,D. W., AND L. N. IRWINE. 1965. Lizard MOCK,D., H. DRUMMOND,AND C. H. STINSON.1990. reproduction: Refractory period and response to Avian siblicide. Am. Sci. 78:438-449. warmth in Uta stansburiana females. Science 148: MOLL, E. 0. 1979. Reproductive cycles and ad- 1613-1614. aptations. Pp. 305-331. In M. Harless and H. Mor- TINKLE,D. W., H. M. WILBUR,AND S. G. TILLEY. lock (Eds.), Turtles: Perspectives and Research. John 1970. Evolutionary strategies in lizard reproduc- Wiley and Sons, New York. tion. Evolution 24:55-74. NUSSBAUM,R. A. 1981. Seasonal shifts in clutch size TRIVERS,R. L., AND D. E. WILLARD.1973. Natural and egg size in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stans- selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of buriana Baird and Girard. Oecologia 49:8-13. offspring. Science 179:90-92. SCHOENER,T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strate- VINEGAR,M. B. 1975. Demography of the striped gies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2:369-404. plateau lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Ecology 56:172- SEXTON,0. J., AND 0. TURNER.1971. The repro- 182. ductive cycle of a neotropical lizard. Ecology 52: VITT,L. J. 1978. Caloric content of lizard and snake 159-164. (Reptilia) eggs and bodies and the conversion of SMITH,C. S., AND S. D. FRETWELL.1974. The op- weight to caloric content. J. Herpetol. 12:65-72. timal balance between size and number of off- . 1981. Lizard reproduction: Habitat spec- spring. Am. Nat. 108:499-506. ificity and constraints on relative clutch mass. Am. STAMPS,J. A,, AND S. K. TANAKA.1981. The influ- Nat. 117:506-514. ence of food and water on growth rates in a tropical . 1990. The influence of foraging mode and lizard (Anolis aeneus). Ecology 62:33-40. phylogeny on seasonality of tropical lizard repro- STEARNS,S. C. 1984. The effects of size and phy- duction. Papkis Avulsos Zool. 37:107-123. logeny on patterns of covariation in the life history VITT,L. J., AND J. D. CONGDON.1978. Body shape, traits of lizards and snakes. Am. Nat. 123:56-72. reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in liz- TINKLE,D. W. 1967. The life and demography of ards: Resolution of a paradox. Am. Nat. 112:595- the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Misc. 608. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 132:l-182. VITT, L. J., AND H. J. PRICE. 1982. Ecological and TINKLE,D. W., AND R. E. RALLINGER.1972. See- evolutionary determinants of relative clutch mass loporus undulatus: A study of the intraspecific in lizards. Herpetologica 38:237-255. comparative demography of a lizard. Ecology 53: 570-584. Accepted: 11 March 1993 Associate Editor: Stanley Hillman TINKLE,D. W., AND A. E. DUNHAM.1986. Com- Herpetological Monographs, 8, 1994, 180-202 O 1994 by The Herpetologists' League, Inc. SPECIES LIMITS IN THE GENUS GERRHONOTUS (SQUAMATA: ANGUIDAE) DAVIDA. GOOD Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA ABSTRACT:Gerrhonotus liocephalus is demonstrated to consist of at least three species rather than the single polytypic species currently recognized. Of the seven currently recognized subspecies, G. 1. aguayoi, G. 1, infernalis and G. 1. taylori become G. infernalis; G. 1. ophiurus and G. 1, loweryi become G.ophiurus; and G.1, austrinus and G.1. liocephalus retain the name G.liocephalus. No subspecies are recognized within any of these three species. Certain populations from western Mexico (Durango, Sinaloa, Jalisco, and Colima) remain of uncertain identity, but are tentatively referred to as G. cf, liocephalus. Evidence for these conclusions is derived from an analysis of scalation, coloration, and morphometric variation. The taxonomic history in Gerrhonotus also is discussed Key words: Alligator lizard; Anguidae; Gerrhonotus;Mexico; Species; Systematics; Texas THEgenus Gerrhonotus at present con- other hand, is among the most widely dis- tains two recognized species. Gerrhonotus tributed alligator lizards (Anguidae: Ger- lugoi is a poorly known form restricted to rhonontinae). Geographic variation in the the vicinity of Cuatro Ciknegas, Coahuila, latter taxon has led to the description of Mexico. Gerrhonotus liocephalus, on the seven subspecies: aguayoi, austrinus, in- 19941 HERPETOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS 181 fernalis, liocephalus, loweryi, ophiurus, apparently were unaware of the descrip- and taylori, with another suggested but not tion of G. liocephalus by Wiegmann and formally described (Smith, 1984). Several did not compare the two taxa. Wiegmann workers have discussed differences in sca- (1834), however, recognized that his G. lation, body proportions, and color pattern liocephalus was identical to S. ventralis. among these forms, but since 1900 this Because he decided that the name "lio- discussion has been restricted to the con- cephalus" ("smooth head") was appropri- text of a single polytypic species. In this ate for the juvenile he had originally de- paper, I will discuss the history of intra- scribed but not for adult specimens such specific taxonomy in the broadly defined as those examined by Peale and Green, G. liocephalus in order to provide a back- Wiegmann (1834) changed the name of ground for the currently accepted specific the species to G, tessellatus. This latter and subspecific limits. I will then re-ana- name was in common use (e.g.,Cope, 1866, lyze the patterns of variation in scalation, 1878; Dumkril and Bibron, 1839; Dumkril morphometrics, and color pattern within and Dumbril, 1851; Gray, 1838, 1845; and among the currently recognized sub- O'Shaughnessy, 1873) until Bocourt (1878) species, and provide evidence for the di- resurrected liocephalus. vision of G. liocephalus into multiple spe- The first Texan specimen, from the can- cies. yon of the Devil's River, was described by In discussing the results of this analysis, Baird (1858) as G. infernalis. Baird did I will use the first six subspecies names not compare his new species with either listed above for ease of comparison with G. liocephalus/G. tessellatus or Scincus previous papers, although I will conclude ventralis. later in the paper that some of them should Cope (1866)described G. ophiurus from be synonymized. The description of Orizaba, Veracruz, as differing from G. aguayoi (Contreras Arquieta, 1989) ap- tessellatus by having a longer tail, shorter peared only in an abstract from a scientific limbs, and a different arrangement of the meeting and hence is of questionable va- head scales. Cope (p. 321) summarized lidity. Because no type specimen was des- what was then known about variation in ignated, the populations referable to it are Gerrhonotus as follows (with terminology unclear and I cannot include it in the char- modified to match that used in the present acter analysis below. I will refer to three paper): unnamed western groups of populations as "western isolates" in presenting the results One preocular; canthal/loreal series consist- and then hypothesize possible species ing of an anterior canthal, an anterior lo- placement in the Discussion. real, and a posterior cantholoreal; ad- pressed limbs separated by the length of Intraspeciflc Taxonomy in Gerrhonotus the hind leg; venter immaculate; tail rel- liocephalus (sensu lato) atively short . G. ventralis No preoculars; canthal/loreal series consist- In 1828, A. F. A. Wiegmann described ing of an anterior canthal, an anterior lo- six species of gerrhonotine lizards on the real, and a posterior cantholoreal; ad- basis of a set of specimens collected by F. pressed limbs separated by length of the Deppe and donated to the Berlin Museum. forearm; dorsum brown with ten cross- Among the specimens described by Wieg- bands; venter black-spotted; .. .. mann was a single juvenile he named Ger- . .. G. tessellatus [=G. liocephalus] rhonotus liocephalus. Wiegmann provid- Two preoculars; three loreals present, no ed no type locality, although the holotype cantholoreal; anterior internasal contact- was clearly from Mexico (as suggested by ing the anterior supralabial; adpressed limbs separated by humerus length; dor- its inclusion by Wiegmann, 1834, in his sum red, with ten light V-shaped cross- Herpetologia Mexicana). bands; venter black-spotted; tail length Soon after the appearance of Wieg- 2.75 times snout-vent length .
Recommended publications
  • Xenosaurus Tzacualtipantecus. the Zacualtipán Knob-Scaled Lizard Is Endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of Eastern Mexico
    Xenosaurus tzacualtipantecus. The Zacualtipán knob-scaled lizard is endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of eastern Mexico. This medium-large lizard (female holotype measures 188 mm in total length) is known only from the vicinity of the type locality in eastern Hidalgo, at an elevation of 1,900 m in pine-oak forest, and a nearby locality at 2,000 m in northern Veracruz (Woolrich- Piña and Smith 2012). Xenosaurus tzacualtipantecus is thought to belong to the northern clade of the genus, which also contains X. newmanorum and X. platyceps (Bhullar 2011). As with its congeners, X. tzacualtipantecus is an inhabitant of crevices in limestone rocks. This species consumes beetles and lepidopteran larvae and gives birth to living young. The habitat of this lizard in the vicinity of the type locality is being deforested, and people in nearby towns have created an open garbage dump in this area. We determined its EVS as 17, in the middle of the high vulnerability category (see text for explanation), and its status by the IUCN and SEMAR- NAT presently are undetermined. This newly described endemic species is one of nine known species in the monogeneric family Xenosauridae, which is endemic to northern Mesoamerica (Mexico from Tamaulipas to Chiapas and into the montane portions of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala). All but one of these nine species is endemic to Mexico. Photo by Christian Berriozabal-Islas. amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 01 June 2013 | Volume 7 | Number 1 | e61 Copyright: © 2013 Wilson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Com- mons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License, which permits unrestricted use for non-com- Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 7(1): 1–47.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca
    Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca John F. Lamoreux, Meghan W. McKnight, and Rodolfo Cabrera Hernandez Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 53 Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca John F. Lamoreux, Meghan W. McKnight, and Rodolfo Cabrera Hernandez Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 53 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organizations. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Lamoreux, J. F., McKnight, M. W., and R. Cabrera Hernandez (2015). Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xxiv + 320pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1717-3 DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2015.SSC-OP.53.en Cover photographs: Totontepec landscape; new Plectrohyla species, Ixalotriton niger, Concepción Pápalo, Thorius minutissimus, Craugastor pozo (panels, left to right) Back cover photograph: Collecting in Chamula, Chiapas Photo credits: The cover photographs were taken by the authors under grant agreements with the two main project funders: NGS and CEPF.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-National Conservation of Alligator Lizards
    MULTI-NATIONAL CONSERVATION OF ALLIGATOR LIZARDS: APPLIED SOCIOECOLOGICAL LESSONS FROM A FLAGSHIP GROUP by ADAM G. CLAUSE (Under the Direction of John Maerz) ABSTRACT The Anthropocene is defined by unprecedented human influence on the biosphere. Integrative conservation recognizes this inextricable coupling of human and natural systems, and mobilizes multiple epistemologies to seek equitable, enduring solutions to complex socioecological issues. Although a central motivation of global conservation practice is to protect at-risk species, such organisms may be the subject of competing social perspectives that can impede robust interventions. Furthermore, imperiled species are often chronically understudied, which prevents the immediate application of data-driven quantitative modeling approaches in conservation decision making. Instead, real-world management goals are regularly prioritized on the basis of expert opinion. Here, I explore how an organismal natural history perspective, when grounded in a critique of established human judgements, can help resolve socioecological conflicts and contextualize perceived threats related to threatened species conservation and policy development. To achieve this, I leverage a multi-national system anchored by a diverse, enigmatic, and often endangered New World clade: alligator lizards. Using a threat analysis and status assessment, I show that one recent petition to list a California alligator lizard, Elgaria panamintina, under the US Endangered Species Act often contradicts the best available science.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Arm Autotomy in the Octopus, Abdopus Aculeatus (D’Orbigny, 1834)
    Characterization of Arm Autotomy in the Octopus, Abdopus aculeatus (d’Orbigny, 1834) By Jean Sagman Alupay A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Roy L. Caldwell, Chair Professor David Lindberg Professor Damian Elias Fall 2013 ABSTRACT Characterization of Arm Autotomy in the Octopus, Abdopus aculeatus (d’Orbigny, 1834) By Jean Sagman Alupay Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Roy L. Caldwell, Chair Autotomy is the shedding of a body part as a means of secondary defense against a predator that has already made contact with the organism. This defense mechanism has been widely studied in a few model taxa, specifically lizards, a few groups of arthropods, and some echinoderms. All of these model organisms have a hard endo- or exo-skeleton surrounding the autotomized body part. There are several animals that are capable of autotomizing a limb but do not exhibit the same biological trends that these model organisms have in common. As a result, the mechanisms that underlie autotomy in the hard-bodied animals may not apply for soft bodied organisms. A behavioral ecology approach was used to study arm autotomy in the octopus, Abdopus aculeatus. Investigations concentrated on understanding the mechanistic underpinnings and adaptive value of autotomy in this soft-bodied animal. A. aculeatus was observed in the field on Mactan Island, Philippines in the dry and wet seasons, and compared with populations previously studied in Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • 0187 Gerrhonotus Multicarinatus.Pdf
    187.1 REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: SAURIA: ANGUIDAE GERRHONOTUS MULTICARINATUS Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. Shaw (1943, 1952), and Stebbins (1954). Stebbins (1944)reported a specimen killed by a millipede, and Brodie (1968)noted death from LAIS, P. MIKE. 1976. Gerrhonotus multicarinatus. Taricha skin toxin. Parasitism by ticks was recorded by Mohr et al. (1964), and by a cestode by Telford (1965). Temperature data are in Brattstrom (1965), and notes on physiological responses to Gerrhonotus multicarinatus (Blainville) temperature in Dawson and Templeton (1966), Cunningham Sonthern alligator lizard (1966), Regal (1966), and Dawson (1967). Hoffman (1973) discussed locomotor activity and metabolic scope, and Schultz and Cordylus (Gerrhonotus) multi-carinatus Blainville, 1835:37. Type• Norberg (1970) the effect of visual loss on activity. Endocrine locality, "Californie," restricted to Monterey, [Monterey system morphology has been studied by Retzlaff (1949, adrenal), County] by Fitch (1934b:173). Holotype, adult, Museum Lynn and Colorigh (1967, thyroid), H. Saint Girons (1967, National d'Histoire Naturelle 2002, collected by P.E. Botta hypophysis), Gabe et a1.(1964, adrenal), and Gabe (1970, adrenal). (holotype examined by author). Brain morphology was described by Senn and Northcutt (1973), Elgaria multicarinata: Gray, 1838:39l. Gerrhonotus caeruleus: Boulenger, 1885:273 (part). Gerrhonotus scincicauda: Stejneger, 1893:195. Gerrhonotus multi-carinatus: Fitch, 1934b:172. Revalidation of I multicarinatus . \. • CONTENT. Five subspecies are recognized: multicarinatus, , .:... webbii, scincicauda, ignavus, and nanus. <. ...• • DEFINITION. A large species of Gerrhonotus (maximum '- snout-vent length 175 mm., tail length over twice snout-vent length), with dorsal scales in 14 longitudinal rows and 40 to 66 transverse rows, and undivided interoccipital. Dorsal scales of both body and tail are heavily keeled.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilocus Species Delimitation in the Crotalus Triseriatus Species Group (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae), with the Description of Two New Species
    Zootaxa 3826 (3): 475–496 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3826.3.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8D8FCB6B-E1DC-4A00-9257-BCAB7D06AE22 Multilocus species delimitation in the Crotalus triseriatus species group (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae), with the description of two new species ROBERT W. BRYSON, JR.1,8, CHARLES W. LINKEM1, MICHAEL E. DORCAS2, AMY LATHROP3, JASON M. JONES4, JAVIER ALVARADO-DÍAZ5, CHRISTOPH I. GRÜNWALD6 & ROBERT W. MURPHY3,7 1Department of Biology & Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Box 351800, Seattle, WA 98195- 1800, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035-7118, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C6. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 416310 Avenida Florencia, Poway, California 92064, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 5Instituto de Investigaciones sobre los Recursos Naturales, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Av. San Juanito Itzic- uaro s/n, Col. Nueva Esperanza, C.P. 58337, Morelia, Michoacán, México. 6Carretera Chapala-Jocotepec Oriente #57-1, Col. Centro, C.P. 45920, Ajijic, Jalisco, México. E-mail: [email protected] 7State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kun- ming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32 Jiaochang Donglu, Kunming 250223, Yunnan, China. E-mail: [email protected] 8Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55 (2010) 153–167
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55 (2010) 153–167 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Conservation phylogenetics of helodermatid lizards using multiple molecular markers and a supertree approach Michael E. Douglas a,*, Marlis R. Douglas a, Gordon W. Schuett b, Daniel D. Beck c, Brian K. Sullivan d a Illinois Natural History Survey, Institute for Natural Resource Sustainability, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820, USA b Department of Biology and Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303-3088, USA c Department of Biological Sciences, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA 98926, USA d Division of Mathematics & Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85069, USA article info abstract Article history: We analyzed both mitochondrial (MT-) and nuclear (N) DNAs in a conservation phylogenetic framework to Received 30 June 2009 examine deep and shallow histories of the Beaded Lizard (Heloderma horridum) and Gila Monster (H. Revised 6 December 2009 suspectum) throughout their geographic ranges in North and Central America. Both MTDNA and intron Accepted 7 December 2009 markers clearly partitioned each species. One intron and MTDNA further subdivided H. horridum into its Available online 16 December 2009 four recognized subspecies (H. n. alvarezi, charlesbogerti, exasperatum, and horridum). However, the two subspecies of H. suspectum (H. s. suspectum and H. s. cinctum) were undefined. A supertree approach sus- Keywords: tained these relationships. Overall, the Helodermatidae is reaffirmed as an ancient and conserved group. Anguimorpha Its most recent common ancestor (MRCA) was Lower Eocene [35.4 million years ago (mya)], with a 25 ATPase Enolase my period of stasis before the MRCA of H.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Captive Breeding Potential of Selected Reptile Taxa Included in Appendices I and II at CITES Cop17
    Evaluation of the Captive Breeding Potential of selected Reptile Taxa included in Appendices I and II at CITES CoP17 Christian Langner Beate Pfau Ronny Bakowskie Clara Arranz Axel Kwet Title: Shinisaurus crocodilurus (Photo: Axel Kwet) Addresses of authors: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde e. V. (DGHT) Dr. Axel Kwet Haldenstraße 28 70736 Fellbach E-Mail: [email protected] Christian Langner Allwetterzoo Münster Altätte 23 48727 Billerbeck E-Mail: [email protected] Dr. Beate Pfau Rathenaustrasse 14 65326 Aarbergen E-Mail: [email protected] Ronny Bakowskie Täubchenweg 12 04317 Leipzig E-Mail: [email protected] Dr. Clara Arranz Heimatstrasse 5 79102 Freiburg E-Mail: [email protected] Supervision BfN: Dr. Mona van Schingen Fachgebiet II 1.1 „Wildlife Conservation“ Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, CITES Scientific Authority (BfN) 2 Contents Prefeace ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 Aims of the project ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………….………… 5 Methods ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… 6 Target Species ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Glossary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………. 8 Lizards Anguidae …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………… 13 Chamaeleonidae ………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….…..…… 99 Gekkonidae …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… 152 Lanthanotidae …………………………………………………………………………………….….…………………………………….…… 162 Shinisauridae ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………
    [Show full text]
  • Class: Amphibia Amphibians Order
    CLASS: AMPHIBIA AMPHIBIANS ANNIELLIDAE (Legless Lizards & Allies) CLASS: AMPHIBIA AMPHIBIANS Anniella (Legless Lizards) ORDER: ANURA FROGS AND TOADS ___Silvery Legless Lizard .......................... DS,RI,UR – uD ORDER: ANURA FROGS AND TOADS BUFONIDAE (True Toad Family) BUFONIDAE (True Toad Family) ___Southern Alligator Lizard ............................ RI,DE – fD Bufo (True Toads) Suborder: SERPENTES SNAKES Bufo (True Toads) ___California (Western) Toad.............. AQ,DS,RI,UR – cN ___California (Western) Toad ............. AQ,DS,RI,UR – cN ANNIELLIDAE (Legless Lizards & Allies) Anniella ___Red-spotted Toad ...................................... AQ,DS - cN BOIDAE (Boas & Pythons) ___Red-spotted Toad ...................................... AQ,DS - cN (Legless Lizards) Charina (Rosy & Rubber Boas) ___Silvery Legless Lizard .......................... DS,RI,UR – uD HYLIDAE (Chorus Frog and Treefrog Family) ___Rosy Boa ............................................ DS,CH,RO – fN HYLIDAE (Chorus Frog and Treefrog Family) Pseudacris (Chorus Frogs) Pseudacris (Chorus Frogs) Suborder: SERPENTES SNAKES ___California Chorus Frog ............ AQ,DS,RI,DE,RO – cN COLUBRIDAE (Colubrid Snakes) ___California Chorus Frog ............ AQ,DS,RI,DE,RO – cN ___Pacific Chorus Frog ....................... AQ,DS,RI,DE – cN Arizona (Glossy Snakes) ___Pacific Chorus Frog ........................AQ,DS,RI,DE – cN BOIDAE (Boas & Pythons) ___Glossy Snake ........................................... DS,SA – cN Charina (Rosy & Rubber Boas) RANIDAE (True Frog Family)
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Kinesis in Lepidosaurs: Skulls in Motion
    Topics in Functional and Ecological Vertebrate Morphology, pp. 15-46. P. Aerts, K. D’Août, A. Herrel & R. Van Damme, Eds. © Shaker Publishing 2002, ISBN 90-423-0204-6 Cranial Kinesis in Lepidosaurs: Skulls in Motion Keith Metzger Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, USA. Abstract This chapter reviews various aspects of cranial kinesis, or the presence of moveable joints within the cranium, with a concentration on lepidosaurs. Previous studies tend to focus on morphological correlates of cranial kinesis, without taking into account experimental evidence supporting or refuting the presence of the various forms of cranial kinesis in these taxa. By reviewing experimental and anatomical evidence, the validity of putative functional hypotheses for cranial kinesis in lepidosaurs is addressed. These data are also considered with respect to phylogeny, as such an approach is potentially revealing regarding the development of various forms of cranial kinesis from an evolutionary perspective. While existing evidence does not allow for events leading to the origin of cranial kinesis in lepidosaurs to be clearly understood at the present time, the potential role of exaptation in its development for specific groups (i.e., cordylids, gekkonids, varanids) is considered here. Directions for further research include greater understanding of the distribution of cranial kinesis in lepidosaurs, investigation of intraspecific variation of this feature (with a focus on ontogenetic factors and prey properties as variables which may influence the presence of kinesis), and continued study of the relationship between experimentally proven observation of cranial kinesis and cranial morphology. Key words: cranial kinesis, lepidosaur skull, functional morphology. Introduction Cranial kinesis, or the presence of moveable joints within the cranium, has been a subject of considerable interest to researchers for more than a century (for references see Bock, 1960; Frazzetta, 1962; Smith, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Snakes, Centipedes, Snakepedes, and Centiserpents: Conflation of Liminal Species in Maya Iconography and Ethnozoology
    f No. 9, 2004 WAYEB NOTES ISSN 1379-8286 SNAKES, CENTIPEDES, SNAKEPEDES, AND CENTISERPENTS: CONFLATION OF LIMINAL SPECIES IN MAYA ICONOGRAPHY AND ETHNOZOOLOGY. (Workshop Closing Paper Presented at the XXIVth Linda Schele Forum on Maya Hieroglyphic Writing at the University of Texas at Austin, March 2000) Harri Kettunen1 and Bon V. Davis II2 1 University of Helsinki 2 University of Texas at Austin Abstract Since the identification of centipedes in the Maya hieroglyphic corpus and iconography in 1994 by Nikolai Grube and Werner Nahm (Grube & Nahm 1994: 702), epigraphers and iconographers alike have debated whether the serpentine creatures in Maya iconography depict imaginative snakes or centipedes. In this paper we argue that most serpentine creatures with unrealistically depicted heads are neither snakes nor centipedes, but a conflation of both, and even have characteristics of other animals, such as sharks and crocodiles. Thus these creatures should more aptly be designated as zoomorphs, monsters, centiserpents, or dragons. In the present article the topic will be examined using iconographic, epigraphic, zoological, and ethozoological data. Acknowledgements We would like to express our thanks to Justin Kerr for directing the Workshop on Maya ceramics at the XXIVth Maya Meeting in Austin. We would also like to thank Justin for making available hundreds of roll-out photographs of Maya ceramics and for offering us his insights on Maya iconography. Furthermore, we would like to thank Nancy Elder, the head librarian of the Biological Sciences Library at the University of Texas at Austin for providing us numerous articles relating to our topic and for directing us to relevant sources during our research on centipedes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressing Problems: Distribution, Threats, and Conservation Status of the Monitor Lizards (Varanidae: Varanus Spp.) of Southeast
    March 2013 Open Access Publishing Volume 8, Monograph 3 The Southeast Asia and Indo-Australian archipelago holds 60% of the varanid global diversity. The major threats to varanids in this region include habitat destruction, international commercialism, and human consumption. Pressing Problems: Distribution, Threats, and Conservation Status of the Monitor Lizards (Varanidae: Varanus spp.) of Southeast Asia and the Indo-Australian Archipelago Monograph 3. André Koch, Thomas Ziegler, Wolfgang Böhme, Evy Arida and Mark Auliya ISSN: 1931-7603 Published in Partnership with: Indexed by: Zoological Record, Scopus, Current Contents / Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences, Journal Citation Reports, Science Citation Index Extended, EMBiology, Biology Browser, Wildlife Review Abstracts, Google Scholar, and is in the Directory of Open Access Journals. PRESSING PROBLEMS: DISTRIBUTION, THREATS, AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE MONITOR LIZARDS (VARANIDAE: VARANUS SPP.) OF SOUTHEAST ASIA AND THE INDO-AUSTRALIAN ARCHIPELAGO MONOGRAPH 3. 1 2 1 3 4 ANDRÉ KOCH , THOMAS ZIEGLER , WOLFGANG BÖHME , EVY ARIDA , AND MARK AULIYA 1Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig & Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Section of Herpetology, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany, email: [email protected] 2AG Zoologischer Garten Köln, Riehler Straße 173, 50735 Köln, Germany 3Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Jl. Raya Bogor km 46, 16911 Cibinong, Indonesia 4Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Department of Conservation Biology, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany Copyright © 2013. André Koch. All Rights Reserved. Please cite this monograph as follows: Koch, André, Thomas Ziegler, Wolfgange Böhme, Evy Arida, and Mark Auliya. 2013. Pressing Problems: Distribution, threats, and conservation status of the monitor lizards (Varanidae: Varanus spp.) of Southeast Asia and the Indo-Australian Archipelago.
    [Show full text]