Update of Evaluation of California's Community Paramedicine Pilot

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Update of Evaluation of California's Community Paramedicine Pilot Update of Evaluation of California’s Community Paramedicine Pilot Program by Janet M. Coffman, PhD, MPP, Lisel Blash, MPA, and Ginachukwu Amah, Healthforce Center and Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies at UC San Francisco February 27, 2019 Abstract / Overview Community paramedicine, also known as mobile integrated health (MIH-CP), is an innovative model of care that seeks to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of health care delivery by using specially trained paramedics in partnership with other health care providers to address the needs of local health care systems. In November 2014, the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) approved an application from the California Emergency Medical Services Authority to establish a Health Workforce Pilot Project, which has encompassed 18 projects in 13 communities across California, testing seven different community paramedicine concepts. Twelve projects are currently enrolling patients. Five of the initial projects have closed for various reasons. One project suspended operations in December 2017 but plans to begin enrolling patients again in 2019. The Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and Healthforce Center at UC San Francisco are conducting an independent evaluation of these projects. This report presents findings through September 30, 2018, for projects currently enrolling patients and projects that have closed. The evaluators conclude that Californians benefit from these innovative models of health care that leverage an existing workforce operating at all times under medical control – either directly or by protocols developed by physicians experienced in emergency care. The projects have improved coordination among providers of medical, behavioral health, and social services and reduced preventable ambulance transports, emergency department visits, and hospital readmissions. They have not resulted in any adverse outcomes for patients. This report presents a summary of major findings from the evaluation for policymakers. All data submitted by project sites are reported to OSHPD on a quarterly basis. Acknowledgements The authors thank the pilot sites, project participants, the California Emergency Medical Services Authority, and the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development for their assistance in carrying out this evaluation. They also thank the California Health Care Foundation for funding the evaluation. Research Report Contents Acknowledgements 2 Alternate Destination – Sobering Center 44 Executive Summary 4 Summary and Conclusion 49 General Project Status 5 Post-Discharge – Short-Term Follow-Up 49 Post-Discharge – Short-Term Follow-Up 5 Frequent EMS User 49 Frequent EMS User 6 Directly Observed Therapy for Tuberculosis 49 Directly Observed Therapy for Tuberculosis 6 Hospice 50 Hospice 7 Alternate Destination – Mental Health 50 Alternate Destination – Mental Health 7 Alternate Destination – Urgent Care 50 Alternate Destination – Urgent Care 8 Alternate Destination – Sobering Center 51 Alternate Destination – Sobering Center 8 Conclusion 51 Conclusion 9 Appendix A. Map of California Community Introduction 10 Paramedicine Pilot ProJects Currently Enrolling Overview of California Community Paramedicine Patients and ProJects Expected to Begin Pilot Projects 10 Enrolling Patients in 2019 52 Training of Community Paramedics 11 Appendix B. Methods for Estimating Savings 53 Patient Safety 12 Post-Discharge – Short-Term Follow-Up 53 Funding 12 Frequent EMS User 53 Methods 13 Directly Observed Therapy for Tuberculosis 54 Results 15 Hospice 54 General Project Status 15 Alternate Destination – Mental Health 55 Post-Discharge, Short-Term Follow-Up 19 Alternate Destination – Urgent Care 55 Frequent EMS User 25 Alternate Destination – Sobering Center 55 Directly Observed Therapy for Tuberculosis 28 References 57 Hospice 31 Alternate Destination – Mental Health 35 Alternate Destination – Urgent Care 40 The mission of the Healthforce Center is to equip health care organizations with the workforce knowledge and leadership skills to effect positive change. Healthforce Center at UCSF 3333 California Street, Suite 410 San Francisco, CA 94143 © 2019 Healthforce Center at UCSF Update of Evaluation of California’s Community Paramedicine Pilot Program 4 Executive Summary Community paramedicine, also known as mobile integrated health (MIH-CP), is an innovative model of care that seeks to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of health care delivery by using specially trained paramedics in partnership with other health care providers to address the needs of local health care systems. On November 14, 2014, the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) approved an application from the California Emergency Medical Services Authority to establish a Health Workforce Pilot Project (HWPP #173) to test multiple community paramedicine concepts. OSHPD has since renewed the HWPP for one-year periods in 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. The community paramedicine HWPP has encompassed 18 projects in 13 communities across California, testing seven different community paramedicine concepts. Twelve projects are currently enrolling patients, including seven projects launched in 2015, one launched in 2017, and four launched in 2018. Five of the initial projects have closed for various reasons. One project suspended operations in December 2017 but plans to begin enrolling patients again in 2019. The HWPP regulations require organizations that sponsor pilot projects to retain an independent evaluator to assess trainee performance, patient acceptance, and cost-effectiveness. The Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and Healthforce Center at UC San Francisco are conducting the evaluation, funded by the California Health Care Foundation. This report presents a summary of major findings from the evaluation for policymakers. All data submitted by project sites are reported to OSHPD on a quarterly basis. The report presents findings from the time the initial group of pilot projects began enrolling patients (June 2015 to October 2015) through September 2018. The seven community paramedicine concepts that sites are testing are described below: 1. Post-Discharge – Short-Term Follow-Up: Provide short-term, home-based follow-up care to people recently discharged from a hospital due to a chronic condition (e.g., heart failure) to reduce their risk of readmission and improve their ability to manage their condition. 2. Frequent Emergency Medical Services (EMS) User: Provide case management services to people who are frequent 911 callers and frequent visitors to emergency departments (EDs) to identify needs that could be met more effectively outside of an ED, and assist patients in accessing primary care and obtaining services to address non-medical needs, such as food, housing, and substance use disorder treatment. 3. Directly Observed Therapy for Tuberculosis: In collaboration with a public health agency, provide directly observed therapy (DOT) to people with tuberculosis (i.e., dispense medications and observe patients taking them) to ensure effective treatment of tuberculosis and prevent its spread. 4. Hospice: In response to 911 calls made by or on behalf of hospice patients, collaborate with hospice agency nurses, patients, and family members to treat patients in their homes according to their wishes instead of transporting them to an ED. 5. Alternate Destination – Mental Health: In response to 911 calls, offer people who have mental health needs but no acute medical needs transport directly to a mental health crisis center instead of to an ED with subsequent transfer to a mental health facility. 6. Alternate Destination – Urgent Care: In response to 911 calls, offer people with low-acuity medical conditions transport to an urgent care center for evaluation by a physician instead of to an ED. © 2019 Healthforce Center at UCSF Update of Evaluation of California’s Community Paramedicine Pilot Program 5 7. Alternate Destination – Sobering Center: In response to 911 calls, offer people who are acutely intoxicated but do not have an acute medical or mental health needs transport directly to a sobering center for monitoring instead of to an ED. Key findings are as follows. General ProJect Status • The pilot projects enrolled 4,304 persons through September 30, 2018. • Thirteen pilot projects were launched from June through October of 2015. • San Francisco’s Alternate Destination – Sobering Center project began enrolling patients in February 2017. • Santa Clara County EMS’s Alternate Destination – Mental Health project and Santa Clara’s Alternate Destination – Sobering Center project began enrolling patients in June 2018. • Central California EMS’s (Fresno) Alternate Destination – Mental Health project began enrolling patients in July 2018. • San Francisco’s Frequent EMS User project began enrolling patients in September 2018. • Five projects, Butte County EMS’s and the UCLA Center for Prehospital Care’s Post-Discharge – Short- Term Follow-Up projects and all three Alternate Destination – Urgent Care projects, have closed. The Post-Discharge – Short-Term Follow-Up projects closed due to lack of local resources. The Alternate Destination – Urgent Care projects closed due to low enrollment. • San Diego’s Frequent EMS User project suspended operations in December 2017 due to a lack of funding but plans to relaunch in 2019. Post-Discharge – Short-Term Follow-Up • From June 2015 through September 2018, the five
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Lezlie Murch, Hilary Aquino, Ronald Mccray
    DAVID L. MURPHY SOBERING CENTER A COLLABORATION BETWEEN EXODUS RECOVERY AND LOS ANGLES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 2019 Lezlie Murch, Hilary Aquino, Ronald McCray by Unknown Author is licensed under SOBERING MODEL • A safe and supportive environment where an intoxicated person can be observed while recovering from active and acute inebriation 2 Exodus Sobering Center Mission (focused on Skid Row and adjacent) The Mission of the Sobering Center is to reduce incarcerations, minimize hospitalizations and assist active, chronic and serial inebriates living on and around Skid Row by providing a path to recovery in a safe and welcoming environment. 3 Sobering Center versus Detox Center A Sobering Center is a different model than a detoxification/ inpatient or residential facility Comparison DLM/ Exodus Sobering Center Detox/Residential Alcohol . Clients must be brought in by designated referral and Other Drug Treatment sources (law enforcement, homeless outreach teams, mental health providers, Exodus staff, local ED’s, . Clients can self refer community partners) . Average length of stay is a minimum of 72 hours . Average length of stay is nine (9) hours and up to several months in step down care . Clients rest in a “sobering pod” in a group setting Clients are assigned a room and private bed/area . Clients are offered hydration and light snacks Full meals are served . Clients must be assessed as medically stable to admit Clients are generally medically unstable and require 24 hour medical observation . Clients under nursing/staff observation who follow . prescribed medical protocols Clients are given detox medication for withdrawal symptoms . Clients are engaged in recovery dialogue by Sober .
    [Show full text]
  • Within-Subjects Analyses of 2-Year Alcohol Trajectories
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE Project-Based Housing First for Chronically Homeless Individuals With Alcohol Problems: Within-Subjects Analyses of 2-Year Alcohol Trajectories Susan E. Collins, PhD, Daniel K. Malone, MPH, Seema L. Clifasefi, PhD, Joshua A. Ginzler, PhD, Michelle D. Garner, MSW, PhD, Bonnie Burlingham, MPH, Heather S. Lonczak, PhD, Elizabeth A. Dana, MA, Megan Kirouac, BS, Kenneth Tanzer, BA, William G. Hobson, MA, G. Alan Marlatt, PhD, and Mary E. Larimer, PhD A review of 29 studies conducted worldwide Objectives. Two-year alcohol use trajectories were documented among estimated an alcohol dependence prevalence of residents in a project-based Housing First program. Project-based Housing First 1 37.9% among homeless populations. Among provides immediate, low-barrier, nonabstinence-based, permanent supportive chronically homeless individuals (i.e., people with housing to chronically homeless individuals within a single housing project. The long-term, often-repeated episodes of homeless- study aim was to address concerns that nonabstinence-based housing may ness2), the prevalence of alcohol dependence enable alcohol use. is even higher.3 Alcohol dependence is associ- Methods. A 2-year, within-subjects analysis was conducted among 95 chron- ated with greater levels of alcohol problems, ically homeless individuals with alcohol problems who were allocated to project- resulting from acute intoxication or long-term based Housing First. Alcohol variables were assessed through self-report. Data on intervention exposure were extracted from agency records. alcoholuse,aswellasincreasedriskforalcohol- Results. Multilevel growth models indicated significant within-subjects de- related deaths.4 --- 7 creases across alcohol use outcomes over the study period. Intervention Unfortunately, traditional housing infra- exposure, represented by months spent in housing, consistently predicted structures designed to serve chronically additional decreases in alcohol use outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Drink: a Cultural History of Alcohol Free Ebook
    DRINK: A CULTURAL HISTORY OF ALCOHOL DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Iain Gately | 546 pages | 05 May 2009 | GOTHAM BOOKS | 9781592404643 | English | New York, United States A History of Hooch Chesterton, Orthodoxy A substance that a third of the world institutionalizes as a religious sacrament and another third expressly forbids on religious grounds is one to be reckoned with. This is linked to faster Drink: A Cultural History of Alcohol of consumption, and can lead to tension and possibly violence as patrons attempt to manoevre around each other. Alcohol and its effects have been present in societies throughout history. Log in or link your magazine subscription. It's why people grew crops, it's why they went to war, and it's why they put so much hops in the Easily one of my favorite books of all time. Unlike binge drinking, its focus is on competition or the establishment of a record. Guinness World Records edition, p. No trivia or quizzes yet. I liked the continuity of the narrative, connecting the world across thousands Drink: A Cultural History of Alcohol years. Drys vs. Your drink is not being taken from you. They were, however, limited to an allowance of eight pints per day. Then prohibit This is one remarkably well-researched, well-written, and fascinating book. Spirits are good, wine is bad. Booze has presided over executions and business deals and marriages and births. It is widely observed that in areas of Europe where children and adolescents routinely consume alcohol early and with parental approval, binge drinking tends to be less prevalent.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of FAMILY and COMMUNITY MEDICINE 2019 Annual Report MESSAGE from the CHAIR
    DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE 2019 Annual Report MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR Over the past year, the Department of Family and Community Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine continued its work at the forefront of medical education and discovery to deliver excellent and holistic patient care. I am pleased that as part of U.S. News & World Report rankings for the best medical schools in the U.S., Baylor College of Medicine ranked #4 in Primary Care Programs and #13 in Family Medicine Specialties. I fully concur with the President, CEO and Executive Dean of Baylor College of Medicine, Paul Klotman, M.D., FACP, who wrote in making the announcement, “The consistent high ranking is a clear indication of our strength and the combined efforts of our faculty, staff, and trainees. The tremendous support we have from our Board of Trustees, affiliated hospitals, community partners and alumni is also an important factor in Baylor College of Medicine continuing to be the highest ranked medical school in Texas as well as the Southwest region.” An April 25 ribbon cutting marked the official opening of the Baylor Medicine Family Medicine Clinic in Houston’s River Oaks area. I joined James T. McDeavitt, M.D., the Senior Vice President and Dean of Clinical Affairs, and President Klotman, who officiated the festivities. The new 8,000 square foot facility has 14 exam rooms, onsite labs, and diagnostics, with same-day and next-day appointments available. Our department now provides holistic care for the entire family at three full-service clinic locations. Other successes filled FY2019 as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Sobering Center Commitments
    Policy Seaside Police Department 470 Policy Manual Sobering Center Commitments 470.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This policy provides Seaside Police Department personnel with guidelines for use of the Sun Street Sobering Center, a supervised facility where subjects arrested by law enforcement for non-violent offenses of public intoxication, or first time offenders arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, may be delivered to the facility in order to be safely monitored while sobering in lieu of traditional booking and incarceration in the Monterey County Jail. 470.2 POLICY It is the policy of this department that Seaside Police Officers may utilize the Sun Street Sobering Center for those individuals who meet the criteria set forth in this policy. 470.3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 470.3.1 SUN STREET CENTER RESPONSIBILITIES (a) Provide a safe and secure setting, supervised 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, by both medical assistants and recovery specialists, where men and women who are contacted by law enforcement agencies for non-violent public intoxication, or are first time offenders driving under the influence of alcohol, can remain while achieving sobriety, staying no less than 4 hours but not more than 23 hours. (b) Accept all law enforcement referrals for subjects who are under the influence of alcohol, in a timely manner, and upon availability of bed space, if the person is not in need of immediate medical attention, is not a known registered sex offender, and is a willing participant to the sobering center. (c) Provide a basic assessment of the sobering center client to determine their level of addiction and needed services, and to provide appropriate referrals for services.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Alcohol and Drug Detoxification Manual 2019
    Regional Alcohol and Drug Detoxification Manual 2019 Arkansas Department of Human Services Division of Aging, Adult and Behavioral Health Services Office of the Drug Director RADD Regional Alcohol and Drug Detoxification Regional Alcohol and Drug Detoxification Manual Office of the Drug Director P.O. Box 1437, Slot W-241 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 501-686-9164 501-686-9396 (fax) 1 Regional Alcohol and Drug Detoxification Manual 2019 2 Regional Alcohol and Drug Detoxification Manual 2019 Contents Regional Alcohol and Drug Detoxification Program ......................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Overview, Essential Concepts, and Definitions in Detoxification ...................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Settings, Levels of Care, and Patient Placement ............................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 3 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 22 An Overview of Psychosocial and Biomedical
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Cost of Alcohol Misuse in Alaska, 2019 Update
    THE ECONOMIC COSTS OF ALCOHOL MISUSE IN ALASKA 2019 UPDATE PREPARED FOR: January 2020 The Economic Costs of Alcohol Misuse in Alaska 2019 Update PREPARED FOR: January 2020 McDowell Group Anchorage Office 1400 W. Benson Blvd., Suite 510 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 McDowell Group Juneau Office 9360 Glacier Highway, Suite 201 Juneau, Alaska 99801 Website: www.mcdowellgroup.net Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................ 1 Big Picture .................................................................................................. 1 Alcohol Consumption ..................................................................................... 2 Contributing Cost Factors ................................................................................ 2 Productivity Losses................................................................................................. 2 Vehicle Traffic Collisions .......................................................................................... 3 Criminal Justice and Protective Services ....................................................................... 4 Health Care ......................................................................................................... 4 Fetal Alcohol Syndrome/Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder ................................................... 5 Public Assistance and Social Services
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Comparative Cost Analysis of the San Francisco
    Evaluation and Comparative Cost Analysis of the San Francisco Sobering Center as an Alternative to the Emergency Department for Individuals with Acute Alcohol Intoxication by Shannon Marie Smith-Bemardin DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Nursing in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO ii Copyright 2016 by Shannon Smith-Bernardin iii Funding Acknowledgments This dissertation was supported by the: • University of California, San Francisco Graduate Dean’s Health Science Fellowship • University of California, San Francisco Nursing Alumni Association scholarship • Earle C Anthony Social Science Fellowship • Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Interdisciplinary Training Program grant number 1U79TI025386-01 as administered by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration • Alcohol Research Group Pre-Doctoral Fellowship through grant number T32 AA007240 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse, the Alcohol Research Group, or the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. iv Acknowledgements I would like to first thank my colleagues at the San Francisco Medical Respite and Sobering Center, who provide exceptional and compassionate care to some of our society’s most vulnerable citizens. I am amazed and inspired at your perseverance, compassion, sense of humor, and unending enthusiasm. This work would not exist without you. I am particularly thankful to Tae-Wol Stanley and Megan Kennel with the San Francisco Sobering Center. Tae-Wol and Megan have offered me an unwavering level of support and flexibility, and I gratefully acknowledge the contribution that they have made which allowed me to pursue this PhD.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Abuse and Alcohol Prevention Program (DAAPP)
    Drug Abuse and Alcohol Prevention Program (DAAPP) The San Diego Community College District City, Mesa & Miramar Colleges and Continuing Education September, 2015 San Diego Community College District Drug Abuse and Alcohol Prevention Program (DAAPP) The Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act and Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Regulations (Education Department General Administrative Regulations [EDGAR]), specifies that no institution of higher education shall be eligible to receive funds or any other form of financial assistance under any Federal program, including participation in any federally funded or guaranteed student loan program, unless the institution certifies to the Secretary that the institution has adopted and has implemented a program to prevent the use of illicit drugs and the abuse of alcohol by students and employees. In response, the San Diego Community College District (SDCCD) has adopted and implemented program and policies to prevent the unlawful possession, use, or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by students and employees. The San Diego Community College District (San Diego City College, San Diego Mesa College, San Diego Miramar College and Continuing Education) is committed to providing a drug free environment. The institutions also prohibit the use of tobacco products and electronic delivery devices on campus or at college/district sponsored events. Any type of drug use, including alcohol, is dangerous and potentially life threatening. Drugs and alcohol adversely affect the body, mind and behavior. The effects vary from person to person and from usage to usage. Even low doses of drugs and alcohol can impair judgment and coordination. If you use drugs or alcohol, you risk overdose, accidents, dependence, ill health, as well as legal, financial and personal problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Mwrc Resource Directory
    RESOURCE DIRECTORY 8/30/2021 FUNDED IN PARTNERSHIP BY A GRANT FROM THE NEW MEXICO HUMAN SERVICES DEPT/BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION. Table of Contents ♦ BEHAVIORAL HEALTH-MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROVIDERS ............................................................ 4 • ACROSS THE MIND MENTAL HEALTH ....................................................................................................................................... 4 • ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS .................................................................................................................................................... 4 • ANDREAS NOVAK, PSYCHOTHERAPY ........................................................................................................................................ 4 • ANGEL PEAK COUNSELING ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 • ANGLIN FAMILY THERAPY ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 • ATB (ACTION THOUGHT BEHAVIOR) BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ............................................................................................. 5 • AWARENESS COUNSELING, PC ............................................................................................................................................... 5 • CASTENELL, MICHAEL DOCTOR OF SOCIAL WORK (DSW), LISW .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Clearance Exam for Alcohol Withdrawal Robert Moore, MD MPH MBA & Jeffrey Devido, MD MTS Partnership Healthplan 1:15 to 1:25 P.M
    Agenda 12:00 to 12:05 PM Welcome/Housekeeping Rules Liezel Lago, Continuing Education Program Coordinator 12:05 to 12:10 PM Introduction Robert L. Moore, MD, MPH, MBA Chief Medical Officer, Partnership HealthPlan of California 12:10 to 1:15 PM First Do No Harm: Medical Clearance Exam for Alcohol Withdrawal Robert Moore, MD MPH MBA & Jeffrey DeVido, MD MTS Partnership HealthPlan 1:15 to 1:25 p.m. Question & Answer Discussion 1:25 PM Adjourn No Conflict of Interest Presenters have signed the Conflict of Interest form and has declared there is no conflict of interest and nothing to disclose for this presentation. - Application for CME** credit has been filed with the American Academy of Family Physicians. Determination of credit is pending. **CME is for physicians and physician assistants and other healthcare professionals whose continuing educational requirements can be met with elective CME. - Provider approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider #CEP16728 for 1 hours. Housekeeping To avoid echoes and feedback, we request that you use the telephone instead of your computer microphone for listening and talking during the webinar. Housekeeping 1.) I Will Call In - Participant to call event number, enter access code and attendee ID. Housekeeping 2.) Call Me - Participant enters a number to call, Webex will call number, participant answers the phone and follows voice instructions. Housekeeping • All participants have been muted to eliminate any possible noise interference/distraction. • If you have a question or would like to share your comments during the webinar, please type your comment in the Chat box or your question in the “Q&A” box.
    [Show full text]
  • 21St Century Recovery: Science Meets Spirituality
    21st Century Recovery: Science Meets Spirituality Oregon Recovers Conference June 8th, 2019 Andrew B. Mendenhall MD, DABAM, DABFM, DABPM Chief Medical Officer Central City Concern 1 Thank you for the opportunity! • Step Twelve: “Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs.” • The joy of living is the theme of A.A.’s twelfth step and action is its key word here we turn outward toward our fellow alcoholics/addicts who are still in distress. • Moment of contemplation 2 Andy Mendenhall M.D. • Family Medicine 2000-2009 • OHSU Residency • ER Medicine VAMC, Reedsport • Providence Medical Group- Family Medicine and Immediate Care Practice • Hospitalist, Emergency Medicine, Hospice • Addiction Medicine 2005-Present • Hazelden • HealthWorksNW • HazeldenBettyFord • CleanSlate Treatment Centers • Central City Concern 3 Central City Concern-SUDS Continuum • 1. Hooper Detoxification and Stabilization Center • 2. Letty Owings Center • 3. CCC Recovery Center • 4. Eastside Concern • 5. CEP- Community Engagement Program • 6. LEAD-Program • 7. Sobering Center • Our 13,000 patients served annually interface with Primary Care, Mental Health Care and Housing with limited capacity. • Active partnerships and referral pathways with more than 40 agencies in the tri- county region. • Full-spectrum SUDS continuum. • Abstinence-only → Permanent Housing 4 Disclosures • Hold a small equity-share in two SUDS treatment companies providing direct-care to patients. • CleanSlate Treatment Centers Northampton, MA • BoulderCare Portland, OR • All information presented today is based in the medical literature except for the information that is specifically identified as not having a peer-reviewed, literature-based background.
    [Show full text]