DOCSLIB.ORG

Uni and Gun Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uni and Gun Control ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. FI REARMS & T HE I P. CONTROL I "r CATIP_DA : WORKING '?EE TS 1 P. Stenning, editor HV 8059 F5 1978 I Ci7?' 11 FIREARMS & THEIR CONTROL IN CANADA: WORKING PAPERS\ LIBRARY MINISTRY OP THE SOLICITOR GENirP Itou UG 2 1903 BIBLIOTHÈQUE MINISTÈRE DU P. Stenning, editor SOLLICITEUR GÉNÉRAL Prepared under contract with the Solicitor General of Canada. or The views expressed in these working papers are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Solicitor General of Canada. December 1978 I TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Summary 1 Acknowledgements 1. Canadian Firearms Laws to 1976 2. Gun Control in Canada: A Discussion of Public Reaction 3. The Control of Firearms in Other Selected Jurisdictions 4. Firearms and Suicide 5. Hunter Safety Training in Canada 6. Guns and Violence 7. Guns in Canada: A Review of Statistics 8. Selected Bibliography FOREWORD FOREWORD In the spring of 1975, the then Solicitor General of Canada, the Honourable Warren Allmand, established the Working Group on Gun Control as a departmental task force. The purposes of the Working Group were to examine the area of firearms ownership and use in Canada, to review existing legal controls of firearms, and to make recommendations as to what changes in the law relating to firearms may be necessary. As the Working Group set about this task, it quickly became aware of the dearth of reliable information and literature on the Canadian situation with respect to the subject of its inquiries. Almost all of the information and literature which was available at that time related either to the United States or to the United Kingdom. Confronted with this situation, the Working Group and the Ministry's Itsearch Division commissioned several persons to undertake preliminary studies of various aspects of firearms ownership and use in Canada. The primary objective of this initial research program was to provide the Working Group with at least a minimum degree of accurate information to enable policy discussions to be undertaken. A second objective was to identify the extent and limitations of existing information on firearms ownership and use in Canada and to indicate what areas would be the subject of more research at a later stage. The papers which appear in this volume are the product of this initial research program of the Working Group.* As such, they constitute a unique contribution to the debate concerning firearms and their control in Canada. Thus it is intended that this volume will be a valuable source of information for all who may participate in the aun control debate in Canada. It is also hoped that this * For a more detailed account of the genesis of these papers, see the "Acknowledgements" section. - 2 - first major collection of research material related to firearms use in Canada will be a stimulus to further research in the area. In addition, these papers represent an indication of what research inputs were used in the development of a major area of criminal justice policy. Since the research papers in this collection were pre- pared in 1975 and early 1976 much of the statistical material and all of the references to existing firearms legislation •are based on data which were available in 1975 and on the legisla- tion which existed at that time. The' only attempts to reflect later developments include a summary of the amendments proposed in February 1976, which is contained in the paper "Canadian Firearms Laws to 1976",and a brief reference to the Gun Ownership Survey carried out in August 1976, which is contained in "Guns in Canada: A Review of Statistics". Other significant developments have taken place between the completion of the research papers and the eventual amend- ments to the legislation. By the Fall of 1976 the amendments which had been proposed earlier that year had not completed the legislative process and the Government did not proceed with them in the subsequent session of Parliament. Insteadtin April 1977 the Government introduced in Parliament new proposals to amend Canada's gun control legislation. By August the amendments had been passed by Parliament and had received Royal Assent. The new legislation was proclaimed in two stages namely on January 1, 1978 and on January 1, 1979. The amendments which came into effect on January 1, 1978 included significant changes to the definition of restricted and prohibited weapons, new penalties for the criminal misuse of firearms, expanded powers of search and seizure by police of firearms in threatening situations, greater powers for the courts to prohibit the possession of firearms by dangerous persons, and new criminal penalties for carelessly handling or using a firearm. The restricted weapons category was expanded to include semi-automatic rifles with a barrel length of less than 18 inches,and which discharge centre-fire ammunition. In addition, persons wishing to acquire a restricted weapon now must cite a specific reason for doing so. The criteria for ownership of a restricted weapon include at least one of use for protection of life, use in a lawful profession or occupation, use in supervised target practice, use as part of a bona fide gun collection, or use as a relic. The legislation also expanded the category of prohibited weapons to include fully automatic firearms as well as operable rifles and shotguns with a barrel length that has been modified to less than 18 inches long, or which can be fired when overall length is less than 26 inches. In addition, no persons other than bona fide collectors can acquire or own a fully automatic weapon.' However bona fide collectors who legally owned a fully automatic weapon as of January 1, 1978 can sell or trade these weapons with other bona fide collectors. The amended penalty provisions for criminal misuse of a firearm Specify that Use of a firearm while committing or attempting to commit an indictable offence carries a mandatory prison sentence of one to fourteen years for a first conviction. Subsequent convictions carry a mandatory penalty of three to fourteen years imprisonment. This' sentence'will be served Consecutive to any prison sentence imposed for the offence in which the firearm was used. In addition, carrying a concealed' weapon or possession of an unregistered restricted weapon is punishable by up to five years , imprisonment, or is an offence punishable on summary.conviction:-1 The expanded powers of search and seizure allow police to search for and seize a firearm without a warrant if there is an immediate danger to the Safety of an individual, and if it is impractical to obtain a warrant. In addition police must furnish an immediate report to a magistrate after any search and seizure has taken place whether or not articles were seized and whether or not a warrant was obtained. The authority to prohibit the ownership and use of firearms and ammunition has been expanded so that persons who have been convicted of an indictable offence involving violence, or any offence involving firearms could be the subject of a court-ordered prohibition for a period of up to ten years. In a more serious class of offences outlined in the legislation, prohibition will be automatically imposed after conviction. The prohibition period will commence after the person has served any prison sentence imposed for the offence. In addition, the police may apply to a magistrate for an order . prohibiting persons who exhibit dangerous or threate- ning behavior.from owning or using a firearm for a period of up to five years. These persons will be notified beforehand . and in writing of their right to oppose the application to a magistrate'for a prohibition order. The prohibition.order \of the magistrate is appealable to the appeal Court. Ns: The amendments which , came into effect on January 1, 1978 also Provide penalties for'persons who carelessly handle, use, or store weapons and ammunition. These penalties, range from a fine to five years' imprisonment, depending on hOw the courts interpret the 'seriousness of the offence. ' The aMendments which were proclaimed on january 1, 1979 , established the Firearms Acquisition Certificate (FAC) system ., affects individuals, and the business permit system which which affects all manufactUring, wholesale, and retail businesses • which deal in firearms and ammunition. The FAC provisions require that any person over 16 years of age who wishes to acquire a firearm through purchase, borrowing and the like must be the holder of a FAC.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sovereign Sells US$1Bn Sukuk but Drops Conventional Tranches
    MARCH 31 2018 ISSUE 2227 www.ifre.com Bargain basement Bahrain: sovereign sells US$1bn sukuk but drops conventional tranches Tesla stumbles as markets face reality: fatal crash and downgrade push bonds below 90 Deutsche Bank hangs Cryan out to dry: Achleitner sounds out replacement CEOs EQUITIES PEOPLE & MARKETS LOANS EMERGING MARKETS Jitters hurt Asia Successful Golden €7.3bn of debt to Mannai gets IPOs: listings Belt law suit fund leveraged Qatar Inc back from China and prompts broader buyout of Akzo in the US dollar India struggle disclaimers Nobel unit bond market 06 07 09 12 SAVE THE DATE: MAY 22 2018 GREEN FINANCING ROUNDTABLE TUESDAY MAY 22 2018 | THOMSON REUTERS BUILDING, CANARY WHARF, LONDON Sponsored by: Green bond issuance broke through the US$150bn mark in 2017, a 78% increase over the total recorded in 2016, and there are hopes that it will double again this year. But is it on track to reach the US$1trn mark targeted by Christina Figueres? This timely Roundtable will bring together a panel of senior market participants to assess the current state of the market, examine the challenges and opportunities and provide an outlook for the rest of the year and beyond. This free-to-attend event takes place in London on the morning of Tuesday May 22 2018. If you would like to be notified as soon as registration is live, please email [email protected]. Upfront OPINION INTERNATIONAL FINANCING REVIEW Dead man walking? Rocket man t was another terrible week for Deutsche Bank. But this ast November, an analyst at Germany’s Nord/LB said it Itime it wasn’t John Cryan’s fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Law History in the United States and Second Amendment Rights
    SPITZER_PROOF (DO NOT DELETE) 4/28/2017 12:07 PM GUN LAW HISTORY IN THE UNITED STATES AND SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS ROBERT J. SPITZER* I INTRODUCTION In its important and controversial 2008 decision on the meaning of the Second Amendment, District of Columbia v. Heller,1 the Supreme Court ruled that average citizens have a constitutional right to possess handguns for personal self- protection in the home.2 Yet in establishing this right, the Court also made clear that the right was by no means unlimited, and that it was subject to an array of legal restrictions, including: “prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”3 The Court also said that certain types of especially powerful weapons might be subject to regulation,4 along with allowing laws regarding the safe storage of firearms.5 Further, the Court referred repeatedly to gun laws that had existed earlier in American history as a justification for allowing similar contemporary laws,6 even though the court, by its own admission, did not undertake its own “exhaustive historical analysis” of past laws.7 In so ruling, the Court brought to the fore and attached legal import to the history of gun laws. This development, when added to the desire to know our own history better, underscores the value of the study of gun laws in America. In recent years, new and important research and writing has chipped away at old Copyright © 2017 by Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing up Indian: an Emic Perspective
    GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTIVE By GEORGE BUNDY WASSON, JR. A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Anthropology and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy june 2001 ii "Growing Up Indian: An Ernie Perspective," a dissertation prepared by George B. Wasson, Jr. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. This dissertation is approved and accepted by: Committee in charge: Dr. jon M. Erlandson, Chair Dr. C. Melvin Aikens Dr. Madonna L. Moss Dr. Rennard Strickland (outside member) Dr. Barre Toelken Accepted by: ------------------------------�------------------ Dean of the Graduate School iii Copyright 2001 George B. Wasson, Jr. iv An Abstract of the Dissertation of George Bundy Wasson, Jr. for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology to be taken June 2001 Title: GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTN E Approved: My dissertation, GROWING UP INDIAN: AN EMIC PERSPECTN E describes the historical and contemporary experiences of the Coquille Indian Tribe and their close neighbors (as manifested in my own family), in relation to their shared cultures, languages, and spiritual practices. I relate various tribal reactions to the tragedy of cultural genocide as experienced by those indigenous groups within the "Black Hole" of Southwest Oregon. My desire is to provide an "inside" (ernie) perspective on the history and cultural changes of Southwest Oregon. I explain Native responses to living primarily in a non-Indian world, after the nearly total loss of aboriginal Coquelle culture and tribal identity through v decimation by disease, warfare, extermination, and cultural genocide through the educational policies of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth About Guns 2018 Fact Sheet
    Children’s Defense Fund Protect Children, Not Guns The Truth About Guns March 2018 1. A gun in the home increases the risk of homicide, suicide, and accidental death. Contrary to what many people believe, having a gun in your home doesn’t make you safer but instead endangers you and your loved ones. A gun in the home makes the likelihood of homicide three times higher,1 suicide three to five times higher,2 and accidental death four times higher.3 For every time a gun in the home injures or kills in self-defense, there are 11 completed and attempted gun suicides, seven criminal assaults and homicides with a gun, and four unintentional shooting deaths or injuries.4 2. Many children live in homes with loaded and unlocked guns. Every parent and grandparent must be careful where their children play and ask if there is a gun in the home. One third of all households with children under 18 have a gun and 45 percent of gun-owning households with children do not store all of their firearms safely.5 Three in 4 children ages 5-14 with gun-owning parents know where firearms are kept in the home and 22 percent have handled a gun in the home without their parents’ knowledge.6 More than half of youths who committed suicide with a gun obtained the gun from their home, usually a parent’s gun.7 3. Guns make violence more deadly. Contrary to what the gun industry says, guns do kill people. Guns make killing easy, efficient, and somewhat impersonal, thereby making anger and violence more deadly.8 An estimated 41 percent of gun-related homicides and 94 percent of gun-related suicides would not occur if no guns were present.9 The use of a gun in family or intimate assaults increased the risk of death 12 times.10 4.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNING Magazine February 2017
    THE STATES AND LOCALITIES February 2017 America’s urban centers face a new era of uncertainty. GOV02_covers.indd 5 1/17/17 3:23 PM Only18 % of surveyed legislators currently sit on a committee with cybersecurity as part of its mandate. Download the Cybersecurity Policy Guide at: governing.com/cyberguide Produced by: __________Designer __________Creative Dir. 100 Blue Ravine Road Folsom, CA 95630 916-932-1300 __________Editorial __________Prepress www.erepublic.com CMY grey T1 T2 T3 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 Page # __________Other ____________OK to go BLACK YELLOW MAGENTA CYAN VOL. 30, NO. 5 02.2017 New York City is attempting to eliminate its traffi c fatalities. STATE OF THE CITIES 38 COUNTING DOWN TO ZERO Can cities end pedestrian deaths? By Daniel C. Vock 26 THE URBAN OPPOSITION Big-city mayors have a lot to lose by confronting the 44 A LITTLE LEARNING new Republican government in Washington. Many Universal pre-kindergarten is widely admired. But of them are planning to do it anyway. it’s hard to fi nd—and even harder to fund. By Alan Greenblatt By Mattie Quinn 32 A THOUSAND CUTS SPECIAL SECTION In much of the country, state help to localities has been slashed. That won’t change anytime soon. WOMEN IN GOVERNMENT Profi les of the 25 newest members of the PHOTO BY DAVID KIDD PHOTO BY DAVID COVER IMAGE: SHUTTERSTOCK.COM By Mike Maciag and J.B. Wogan Governing Institute's leadership program for women in the public sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Second Amendment
    PROTESTS, INSURRECTION, AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT The Gun Rights Movement and “Arms” Under the Second Amendment By Eric Ruben, Assistant Professor, SMU Dedman School of Law, and Fellow, Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law PUBLISHED JUNE 2021 Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law Introduction After Donald Trump supporters breached the U.S. Capitol on January 6 wielding weapons including tasers, chemical sprays, knives, police batons, and baseball bats, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) remarked that the insurrection “didn’t seem . armed.”1 Johnson, who is A-rated by the National Rifle Association (NRA),2 observed, “When you hear the word ‘armed,’ don’t you think of firearms?”3 For many, the answer is likely yes. This essay describes how the gun rights movement has contributed to the conflation of arms and firearms. In doing so, it shows how that conflation is flatly inconsistent with the most important legal context for arms — the Second Amendment. Neglecting non-gun arms obscures how Americans actually own, carry, and use weapons for self-defense and elevates guns over less lethal alternatives that receive constitutional protection under District of Columbia v. Heller.4 Now is the time to place gun rights into the broader Second Amendment context, on the eve of the Supreme Court’s next big Second Amendment case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Corlett.5 Heller’s Definition of Arms and Its Potential Implications The Second Amendment protects arms, not firearms,6 and in Heller, the Supreme Court defined an arm as any “[w]eapon[] of offence” or “thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands,” that is “carr[ied] .
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Gun Ownership in Wartime China (1937-1945) Lei Duan
    PRESENTATION FOR THE AACS ANNUAL CONFERENCE Private Guns, National Politics: Regulating Gun Ownership in Wartime China (1937-1945) Lei Duan In early 1940, the female communist cadre Wei Gongzhi wrote to the Henan Provincial Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). After three-month long social survey in Henan province, she observed that “weapons can be brought anywhere by ordinary civilians in Henan, and so foreign and indigenous guns are available in every village.”1 Evidence from several sources confirms that almost each county in west and south Henan province had more than 10,000 guns in the hands of civilians. The Henan Provincial Committee of the CCP was pleased to see the general prevalence of private guns in local society of Henan. These communist cadres were aware of the importance of mobilizing the armed civilians to develop the CCP’s power in Henan province. The CCP quickly endeavored to organize these armed people and make use of their potential military power. It was proved that the CCP’s policies towards armed civilians played an important part in enhancing its power in North China. Wei was not alone in this observation. Newspapers during the Republican period were filled with criminal cases of shootings and firearm smuggling in which the firearms figured prominently. These accounts together suggest new aspects of Chinese society in the first half of the 20th century when many civilians became owners of private guns. Not only in Henan, many sources in the first half of 20th century prove that personal weapon ownership was surprisingly common in Wartime China (1937-1945), when many civilians became owners of guns for self- defense.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early American Origins of the Modern Gun Control Debate: the Right to Bear Arms, Firearms Regulation, and the Lessons of History
    CORNELL 5/21/2006 10:06 PM THE EARLY AMERICAN ORIGINS OF THE MODERN GUN CONTROL DEBATE: THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, FIREARMS REGULATION, AND THE LESSONS OF HISTORY Saul Cornell* I. INTRODUCTION The debate over gun control is hardly a new development in American history. Although modern opponents of gun regulation have asserted that gun control is a recent phenomenon, inspired by a racist and anti-immigrant agenda, that claim, like so many claims in Second Amendment scholarship, is false. The earliest efforts at gun control were enacted during the Jacksonian era, when Americans grappled with the nation’s first gun violence crisis. A number of states passed the first laws intended to reduce gun violence. Then, as now, the enactment of gun control prompted a backlash, which led to an intensified commitment to gun rights. The embarrassing truth about the Second Amendment debate that neither side wishes to admit is that gun rights ideology is the illegitimate and spurned child of gun control.1 * Associate Professor of History and Director of the Second Amendment Research Center, John Glenn Institute. I would like to thank Dean Larry Kramer and Professor Robert Weisberg, Director of the Stanford Criminal Justice Center for their cooperation in hosting this symposium. My research assistant Nathan DeDino provided invaluable support with footnote checking and other research tasks. I would also like to thank Gerry Leonard and Kurt Lash for thoughtful comments on this essay. An earlier draft of this essay was presented at the University of Minnesota Law School. I would like to thank Jim Chen and the members of the Law School’s Squaretable lunch group for their thoughtful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Paper the Regulation of Civilian Ownership and Use of Small
    @ Centre for humanitarian dialogue Centre pour le dialogue humanitaire 114 rue de lausanne ch 1202 genève Briefing Paper The regulation of civilian ownership and use of small arms By Ms. Lora Lumpe1 In advance of the international meeting in Rio de Janeiro, 16-18 March 2005 Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, February 2005 1 This briefing paper was developed by Lora Lumpe, with contributions from Cate Buchanan and Emile LeBrun. Elements and sections of the paper were also drawn from the draft chapter developed by Wendy Cukier and Adele Kirsten on the regulation of civilian possession for a forthcoming publication from the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. The publication will be launched at the July 2005 Biennial Meeting of States. This paper aims to stimulate discussion at the Rio meeting as well as provide an opportunity to gather feedback on the policy suggestions put forward. Content Page Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3 Human (In)security: civilians and gun violence ............................................... 4 A useful framework: The public health approach Rights-based arguments: State responsibility The Illicit Trade and National Arms Control..................................................... 6 Widespread theft of civilian firearms: holding gun owners responsible Substitution and the need for harmonisation of laws Standard Setting ............................................................................................. 8 Programme of Action
    [Show full text]
  • The US Firearms Industry Production and Supply
    14 The US Firearms Industry Production and Supply by Jurgen Brauer A Working Paper of the Small Arms Survey Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2013 Published in February 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Copy-edited by Alex Potter ([email protected]) Proofread by Donald Strachan Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Frank Benno Junghanns www.raumfisch.de/sign Printed by coprint in France by GPS ISBN 978-2-9700856-0-7 ISSN 1661-4445 2 Small Arms Survey Working Paper 14 Brauer The US Firearms Industry: Production and Supply 3 The Small Arms Survey The Small Arms Survey is an independent research project located at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, Switzerland. Established in 1999, the project is supported by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs and current contributions from the Governments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The Survey is grateful for past support received from the Governments of France, New Zealand, and Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Market in Firearms
    UNIVERSITY MODULE SERIES Firearms 3 THE LEGAL MARKET IN FIREARMS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME EDUCATION FOR JUSTICE UNIVERSITY MODULE SERIES Firearms Module 3 THE LEGAL MARKET IN FIREARMS UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2019 This Module is a resource for lecturers. Developed under the Education for Justice (E4J) initiative of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), a component of the Global Programme for the Implementation of the Doha Declaration, this Module forms part of the E4J University Module Series on Organized Crime and is accompanied by a Teaching Guide. The full range of E4J materials includes university modules on integrity and ethics, crime prevention and criminal justice, anti-corruption, organized crime, trafficking in persons / smuggling of migrants, cybercrime, wildlife, forest and fisheries crime, counter-terrorism as well as firearms. All the modules in the E4J University Module Series provide suggestions for in-class exercises, student assessments, slides and other teaching tools that lecturers can adapt to their contexts, and integrate into existing university courses and programmes. The Module provides an outline for a three-hour class, but can be used for shorter or longer sessions. All E4J university modules engage with existing academic research and debates, and may contain information, opinions and statements from a variety of sources, including press reports and independent experts. Links to external resources were tested at the time of publication. However, as third-party websites may change, please contact us if you come across a broken link or are redirected to inappropriate content. Please also inform us if you notice that a publication is linked to an unofficial version or website.
    [Show full text]
  • Firearm Ownership and Violent Crime in the U.S. an Ecologic Study Michael C
    Firearm Ownership and Violent Crime in the U.S. An Ecologic Study Michael C. Monuteaux, ScD, Lois K. Lee, MD, David Hemenway, PhD, Rebekah Mannix, MD, Eric W. Fleegler, MD Introduction: Although some view the ownership of firearms as a deterrent to crime, the relationship between population-level firearm ownership rates and violent criminal perpetration is unclear. The purpose of this study is to test the association between state-level firearm ownership and violent crime. Methods: State-level rates of household firearm ownership and annual rates of criminal acts from 2001, 2002, and 2004 were analyzed in 2014. Firearm ownership rates were taken from a national survey and crime data were taken from the Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports. Rates of criminal behavior were estimated as a function of household gun ownership using negative binomial regression models, controlling for several demographic factors. Results: Higher levels of firearm ownership were associated with higher levels of firearm assault and firearm robbery. There was also a significant association between firearm ownership and firearm homicide, as well as overall homicide. Conclusions: The findings do not support the hypothesis that higher population firearm ownership rates reduce firearm-associated criminal perpetration. On the contrary, evidence shows that states with higher levels of firearm ownership have an increased risk for violent crimes perpetrated with a firearm. Public health stakeholders should consider the outcomes associated with private firearm ownership. (Am J Prev Med 2015;](]):]]]–]]]) & 2015 American Journal of Preventive Medicine Introduction more widespread firearm availability as a deterrent to crime and to enhance personal defense. However, the irearm violence is a persistent public health con- empirical evidence for the relationship between the level cern in the U.S., with more than 10,000 American of firearm ownership and the incidence of criminal firearm homicides annually,1 which is the highest F 2 activity, albeit extensive, remains controversial.
    [Show full text]