DOCSLIB.ORG

The Carter Center

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

~~ ft \\\II\ 1\IIIIUI\D\1 I\\ TCC0001 0030 THE CARTER CENTER The United States and the Establishment of a Permanent International Criminal Court The United States and the Establishment of a Permanent International Criminal Court Conflict Resolution Program/Human Rights Committee The Carter Center One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30307 ( 404) 420-5185 Fax ( 404) 420-5196 http://www.cmory.edu/CARTER_CENTER THE CARTER CENTER I The United States and the Establishment of a Permanent International Criminal Court Nov. 13, 1997 The Carter Center Atlanta, Georgia Participants Ozong Agborsangaya, Project Coordinator, Democracy Program/Human Rights Committee, The Carter Center; Cameroon Harry Barnes, Director, Conflict Re olution Program, and C hair, Human Rights Committee, The Carter Center; United States David Bederman, Professor, Emory University Law School; United States Nina Bang,Jansen, Special Counsel, Coalition for International Justice; United tares M. Cheri£ Bassiouni, Vice Chair, U.N. Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) for the International C riminal Court (ICC), and Professor, DePaul Untversity Law School; United States/Egypt Harold Berman, Professor, Emory Umversiry Law chool; Umted State Emma Bonino, Commtsstoner, European Commission for Humanitarian Affair:-; Italy Marino Busdachin, Prestdent, No Peace Wtthout Ju rice; Italy Roger Clarke, Professor, Rutgers Umver:-.1ty chool of Law,Camden; Australia Gianfranco Dell' Alba, Member, European Parlmment; Italy Richard Dicker, Associate Counsel, Human Rtghts Watch; Umted States Stephen Bowen, Program Director, International Human Rtghts Law Group; Untted States Marco Cappato, ICC Project Coordinator; Italy Marco De Andreis, Cabinet Member, European Commtssion for Humanitarian Affairs; Italy Clarence Dias, Executive Director, International Center for Law in Development; India Robert Downey, Oiplomat,m-Restdence, The Carter Center; United States Carol Emmons, Executive Dtrector, Georgta Council of International Visitors; United rates Jerry Fowler, Legislative Counsel, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights; Umted States Morton Halperin, Senior Vice President, Twentieth Century Fund; United States Steven Hochman, Associate Director of Programs and Faculty Assistant to Prestdent Carter, The Carter Center; United States Howard Hunter, Dean, Emory University Law School; Umted States Benjamin Ferencz, Former Chief U.S. Prosecutor for Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal; United States Steven Gerber, Coordinator, Washington Working Group on the ICC; United Stares I_ 3 The United States and the Establishment of a Permanent International Criminal Court Meg Hartin, Judge; United States Katherine Huffman, Staff Attorney, Southern Center for Human Rights; United States Christopher Joyner, Professor, Department of Government, Georgetown University; United States Tanya Karanasios, Program Officer, International Law and Human Rights Program, Parliamentarians for Global Action; United States Robert Kushen, Deputy Director, Open Society Institute; United States Ada Lao, Congressional A ide to Rep. Cynthia McKinney (0-Ga.); United States Mary Marrow, Outreach Coordinator, Women's Caucus for Gender Justice in the ICC; United States Kerry McGrath, Deputy Director, Southern Region Office, Amnesty International; United States H elena Nygren Krug, Human Rights Consultant, Conflict Resolution Program/Human Rights Committee, The Carter Center, and Adjunct Professor, Emory University Law School; Sweden Roy Lee, Direcwr, Codification. Division, Office of Legal Affairs, U.N. PrepCom for the Establishment of an ICC; China Jeanette Mansour, Program Officer, the Charles Stewart Man Foundation; United States Johnny Mason, Judge; United States Brian McKeon, Minority Counsel, Senate Foreign. Relations Committee; United States Julie Mertus, Visiting Professor, Emory University Law School; United States Regina Monticone, Executive Assistant, No Peace Without Ju rice; United States William Pace, Executive Director, Nongovernmental Organization Coalition for an ICC; United States Robert Pastor, Director and Fellow, Latin American and Caribbean Program, The Carter Center; United States Marco Perduca, ICC Project Coordinator for the Americas, No Peace Without Justice; Italy Matthew Meselson, Professor, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University; United States Molly O'Brien, Administrative Professor, Emory University Law School; United States Stefano Palumbo, Press Agent, No Peace Without justice; Italy )elena Pejic, European Coordinator, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights; United States Michele Polizzotto, ICC Project Coordinator, No Peace Without Justice; Italy Michael Posner, Executive Director, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights; United States Shavia Rafi, Secretary-General, Parliamentarians for G lobal Action; Pakistan and United States Bertie Ramcharan, Director, Africa Division, U.N. Department of Political Affairs; Guyana Elspeth Revere, Associate Director of the General Program, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Fountlation; United States His Excellency A.N.R. Robinson, President, Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; Trinidad Her Excellency Patricia Robinson, First Lady, Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; Trinidad Karin Ryan, Assistant Director, Conflict Resolution Program, and Vice Chair, Human Rights Committee, The Carter Center; United States David Scheffer, Assistant Secretary, Ambassador at Large fo r War Crimes Issues; United States - 4 THE CARTER CENTER I Eric chwartz, pecial Assistant to the Prestdcnt and cntor Director, Democracy, Human Rtghts, and llumanttanan Affairs, National Sec.unty Counctl; United State::. Frank Sieverts, Assistant to the Head of Dclcgauon, International Committee of the Red Cross; Unttcd States William Spencer, pecial Advisor, Bureau nf Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Department nt State; United States David Stoelting, Co-chair, International Law Scctton Committee on the ICC, American Bar Assnctattnn (ABA); Umted States Gordon Streeb, Associate Executive Dm·cwr for Preventton and Resolution of Confltu Program~. The Carter Center; United tares Kirk Wolcott, Project Coordinator, Confltcr Rcsnlutton Program, The Carter Center; UntteJ rates )ohan van der Vyver, Profes or, Emory Umverstty Law chool; South Africa Mark Zaid, Managmg Director, Public lnformatton Law and Policy Group, ABA; Umted tate:, The United States and che Establishment of a Permanent International Criminal Court Table of Contents Foreword by Jimmy Carter 7 Preface and Acknowledgments by Harry Barnes 8 Paraph rased Excerpts of Conference Speeches 1. Opening: ] immy Carter, former U.S. President and Chair, The Carter Cen ter 9 2. Introductory Remarks: Emma Bonino, Commissioner, Eu ropean Commission for 11 Humanitarian Affairs 3. The First Panel: 13 M. Cherif Bassiouni, V ice Chair, U.N. Preparatory Committee for the International Criminal Court David Scheffer, Assistant Secretary, Ambassador at Large for War C rimes Issues Michael Posner, Executive Director, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights 4. General Discussion on Aggression 22 5. General Discussion on the Role of the U.N. Security Council 23 6. The Second Panel: 27 Eric Schwartz, Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director, Democracy, Human Rights, and Humanitarian Affairs, National Security Council Mark Zaid, Managing Director, Public Information Law and Policy Group, American Bar Association Richard Dicker, Associate Counsel, Human Rights Watch 7. International Cooperation: M. C herif Bassiouni 35 8. Summary Report of Proceedings: Morton Halperin, Senior Vice President, 37 Twentieth Century Fund 9. C losing Remarks: Emma Bonino 39 Postscript by M. C herif Bassiuoni 41 Appendices 43 About The Carter Center 58 6 I THE CARTER CENTER I An ICC will not he .1 panacea for all ills, but it Foreword wtll be good for the Umted tare~ and all nations. It marks the next essential step on the road to a more by Jimmy Carter just, peaceful world, anJ the UntteJ Stare~ must lead the way. • ift) year~ ago, aggresston, war crimes, and cnmes agamst humantty during World War ll Fgave me to the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunab and sparked a movement to 1..reate the.: Umversal Declaration of Human Rtghts, an unprecedented commitment by natiOns to freedom and peace. As we celebrate that milestone, we are challenged to create mstitutions that will rein- ~ vigorate the Declaration's promise. To thts end, / //;77 formation of a permanent International Crimmal Court (ICC) is essential. Existing laws have been inadequate to prevent genocide and other modern-day atrocities. For poli tical and financial reasons, ad hoc tribunals mandated to address crimes in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda have not fulfilled their promise~. Only a permanent ICC with adequate resources and a hroad mandate can meet expectations for JUstice, thereby deterring future criminal acts and encourag­ ing reconciliation for past cnmes. On Nov. 13, 1997, The Carter Center anJ No Peace Without Justice brought key player~ to Atlanta to discuss the Untted State:-. and e~tahltsh ment ot a permanent ICC. As rhe final opportunity to prepare a draft treaty approaches 111 Junc 1998, I hope this report will delineate potenttal points of Lonsensus on major outstanding issues. Most agree the ICC must he mdepenJcnt, impartial, and able to admintster JUstice wtthour polincal interference. Still, It 1s far from cl!rtatn that negotiation:; about procedural, hudgerary, and legal details will produce a sound framework for its operation. Perhaps most important, the proposal to ubJeCt ICC JUrisdiction
Recommended publications
  • The Peace Vs. Justice Debate and the Syrian Crisis

    The Peace Vs. Justice Debate and the Syrian Crisis

    American University Washington College of Law Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals Scholarship & Research 2018 The Peace vs. Justice Debate and the Syrian Crisis Paul Williams Lisa Dicker C. Danae Paterson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons THE PEACE VS. JUSTICE PUZZLE AND THE SYRIAN CRISIS Paul R Williams,' Lisa K Dicker," C. Danae Paterson I. INTRODUCTION........................................... 418 II. THE "PEACE-FIRST" APPROACH ........................ ..... 420 A. PrioritizingEnding the Conflict. .................. ....... 421 B. Benefits of the Peace-FirstApproach.............. ............ 422 1. Saving Lives...................................... 422 2. Ending Harm to the Environment and Infrastructure ..................... 422 3. Promoting Reconciliation ....................... ..... 423 C. Achieving Peace-Firstin Practice........................ 423 1. Singular Objective of Ending the Conflict............ ..... 423 2. Negotiating with the Guys with Guns ...... ....................... 424 3. Accommodation and Appeasement................ ......... 424 4. Minimizing Justice .............. ................... 425 5. Amnesty ........................................ 426 D. Case Studies ............................... ........ 426 * Rebecca
  • Contemporary Anti-Semitism: an Urgent Challenge

    Contemporary Anti-Semitism: an Urgent Challenge

    Contemporary Anti-Semitism: An Urgent Challenge MARY ROBINSON Director Ethical Globalization Initiative An Interview with Priya Bindra, Jesse Finkelstein, and Julia Kay; and an Abridged Transcript Brown University, 8 November 2004 The Honorable Mary Robinson was the first female President of Ireland, serving from 1990 to 1997, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, from 1997 to 2002. She is currently Director ofthe Ethical Globalization Initiative, which aims to foster more equitable international trade and development, strengthen responses to HIV/AIDS in Africa, and shape more humane miration policies. Brown Journal of World Affairs: You are speaking today about contemporary anti- Semitism in Europe. Do you think this is a global phenomenon, or is it solely a Euro- pean problem? Mary Robinson: I think it a global phenomenon. It just happens to be particularly virulent in Europe, and I have been conscious of that for a number of years. This is not the first time I am speaking about this; as Commissioner, I wrote to the foreign minis- tries of a number of European governments in 2002 asking them to take more active steps. It was of course the Nazi period in Europe that was one ofthe darkest moments of anti-Semitism, and was what led to global recognition ofthe problem. It prompted the recognition that the world needed a United Nations Charter, and I recall that the Jewish community here in the United States played a very significant role in the draft- Copyrigbt © 2005 by the Brown Journal of World Affairs WINTER/SPRING 2005 • VOLUME XI, ISSUE 2 MARY ROBINSON ing of that charter.
  • Texts Adopted

    Texts Adopted

    2004 - 2005 TEXTS ADOPTED at the sitting of Tuesday 9 March 2004 PART ONE P5_TA-PROV(2004)03-09 PROVISIONAL EDITION PE 342.484 EN EN CONTENTS TEXTS ADOPTED P5_TA-PROV(2004)0123 Waste ***I (A5-0117/2004 - Rapporteur: Giuseppe Gargani) European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on waste (codified version) (COM(2003) 731 – C5-0577/2003 – 2003/0283(COD))..........................................................................................................................1 P5_TA-PROV(2004)0124 Extraction solvents used in the production of foodstuffs ***I (A5-0085/2004 - Rapporteur: Giuseppe Gargani) European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on the approximation of the laws of the Member States on extraction solvents used in the production of foodstuffs and food ingredients (codified version) (COM(2003) 467 – C5-0364/2003 – 2003/0181(COD)) ..............................................................2 P5_TA-PROV(2004)0125 Cargo shipping ***I (A5-0086/2004 - Rapporteur: Giuseppe Gargani) European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision concerning the activities of certain third countries in the field of cargo shipping (codified version) (COM(2003) 732 – C5-0578/2003 – 2003/0285(COD)) ..................3 P5_TA-PROV(2004)0126 Participation in pre-accession Community assistance programmes * (A5-0089/2004 - Rapporteur: Luis Berenguer Fuster ) European Parliament
  • United States of America

    United States of America

    United Nations A/HRC/16/11 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2011 Original: English Human Rights Council Sixteenth session Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* United States of America * Previously issued as document A/HRC/WG.6/9/L.9. The annex to the present report is circulated as received. GE.11-10069 A/HRC/16/11 Contents Paragraphs Page Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–4 3 I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process................................................ 5–91 3 A. Presentation by the State under review........................................................... 6–7 3 B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review........................ 8–91 4 II. Conclusions and/or recommendations..................................................................... 92–94 13 Annex Composition of the delegation ......................................................................................................... 29 2 A/HRC/16/11 Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its ninth session from 1 to 12 November 2010. The review of the United States of America was held at the 9th meeting, on 5 November 2010. The delegation of the United States of America was headed jointly by the Honourable Esther Brimmer, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of International
  • Reforming Myanmar's Military

    Reforming Myanmar's Military

    Reforming Myanmar’s Military BY ERIN MURPHY, MATTHEW TURPIN, AND PETER KUCIK he developing relationship between the U.S. and Myanmar represents one of the most positive foreign policy shifts in recent memory. Myanmar is one of few former despotic T nations to have “unclenched its fist” and now enjoys generally positive international sup- port. With the U.S. actively engaged in civil capacity building efforts, the people of Myanmar are testing their new freedom of speech to debate nearly all facets of their public and private sectors. The path to democratic and economic reform, begun in 2011, will likely be rocky, but the positive momentum is clear. There is however one glaring omission in U.S. efforts to help Myanmar: assistance in reform- ing its military institutions. Critics of comprehensive military assistance suggest that conducting military-to-military engagement offers something for nothing, as the Myanmar military has shown few signs of reform. With ongoing human rights abuses, the U.S. should not provide any benefits to Myanmar’s military through enhanced ties. Additionally, some critics believe that U.S. military assistance will simply result in making Myanmar’s military better at abusing the civilian popula- tion and will give them the tools to undermine democratic and economic reforms. While these are legitimate concerns, direct military-to-military engagement with Myanmar is a critical part of the overall reform effort. Ignoring this crucial segment of Myanmar’s society risks undermining the long-term stability and development of the country. As the military is Myanmar’s most powerful institution, the U.S.
  • Dear Friends

    Dear Friends

    Dear Friends, Greetings from the Project on Middle East Democracy! Last week, Syrian violence and repression continued as Secretary Clinton announced President Assad had lost his legitimacy. Secretary Clinton also announced U.S. recognition of the Transitional National Council in Libya. Analysts debated the legitimacy of the National Dialogue in Bahrain amidst continued government repression. Meanwhile, popular frustration continues to mount in Egypt at the slow pace of reform. Look for next week to be dominated by increased international pressure on President Assad in Syria, as well as working toward a negotiated settlement in Libya. For more detailed coverage of the debates surrounding U.S. foreign policy and the prospects for democracy in the Middle East, be sure to check out our blog, the POMED Wire. Also, POMED's Weekly Wire is now available in Arabic - to register to receive the Arabic version by email, please click here. The Weekly Wire July 18, 2011 Legislation No relevant legislation was discussed this week. Committee Hearings The Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia held the first of two hearings on “Promoting Peace? Re-examining U.S. Aid to the Palestinian Authority.” The hearing was presided over by Chairman Steve Chabot (R-OH), and ranking member Gary Ackerman (D- NY). The witnesses were Jacob Walles, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs; Lieutenant General Michael Moeller; and George A. Laudato, USAID Administrator’s Special Assistant for the Middle East. The U.S. House of Representatives Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a hearing on human rights in Syria.
  • Orientation 2021: Play Ball!

    Orientation 2021: Play Ball!

    Orientation 2021: Play Ball! August 16-20, 2021 Evening Students Professional attire is requested on Tuesday, optional on subsequent days. Monday, August 16 8:00am-10:00am The Commons AU ID pick-up 7:30am-5:00pm Offsite IMBY (“In My Backyard”) (OPTIONAL) Day of service for students, faculty, and staff. 2:00pm-5:00pm The Commons Advance Check-In and Orientation Packet Pick-up Opportunity for both full-time and part-time evening students to fulfill their required check-in with JD Admissions and pick up your Orientation Packet. Tuesday, August 17 9:45am-10:30am Claudio Grossman Faculty Big Ideas (OPTIONAL) Hall Several faculty share their stories and legal passions! 10:30am-11:15am Welcome To Your New City (OPTIONAL) Join D.C. Councilman and WCL Alumnus Robert White in a conversation about D.C. beyond the monuments. 11:15am-12:15pm Navigating Law School (OPTIONAL) AUWCL is more than 3 buildings, 8 acres, and lots of casebooks. It’s the people and their experiences (sometimes in common and sometimes not) that make this place so special. Come learn about your new community, and don’t forget to bring your phone! 12:00pm-5:00pm The Commons Headshots (OPTIONAL) Update your LinkedIn profile and other professional links with your new professional photograph. 3:15pm-4:00pm Claudio Grossman The Law of Law School (OPTIONAL) Hall A conversation with Dean Jaffe and co-author Jonathan Yusef Newton on The Law of Law School. 4:00pm-5:00pm WCL Campus Open House (OPTIONAL) Find your locker, take a campus tour, and begin the scavenger hunt! 5:00pm-6:00pm NT01/Zoom Parents, Partners, and Friends (OPTIONAL) Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs Amanda Leiter breaks down law school for students’ loved ones.
  • Awesome New Additions to the Legoland® Windsor Resort in 2019

    Awesome New Additions to the Legoland® Windsor Resort in 2019

    AWESOME NEW ADDITIONS TO THE LEGOLAND® WINDSOR RESORT IN 2019 • Everything is Awesome as LEGOLAND Opens “The LEGO® MOVIE™ 2 Experience • Brand New The Haunted House Monster Party Ride Launching in April 2019 • LEGO® City comes to life in a new 4D movie - LEGO® City 4D – Officer in Pursuit 2019 will see exciting new additions to the LEGOLAND® Windsor Resort when it reopens for the new season. From March 2019, LEGO® fans can discover The LEGO® MOVIE™ 2 Experience, April will see the opening of a spooktacular new ride; The Haunted House Monster Party and in May, a families will see LEGO City come to life in a new 4D movie; LEGO® City 4D - Officer in Pursuit! The LEGO® MOVIE™ 2 Experience In The LEGO® MOVIE™ 2 Experience, guests can experience movie magic and explore an actual LEGO® set as seen in “The LEGO® MOVIE™ 2”. Returning heroes Emmet, Wyldstyle, and their LEGO co-stars can be spotted in their hometown of Apocalypseburg recreated in miniature LEGO scale. Families will be amazed by the details that go into making this 3D animated blockbuster movie. The LEGO® MOVIE™ 2 Experience is created out of 62,254 LEGO bricks, featuring 628 types of LEGO elements, utilizing 31 different colours. The new attraction offers guests a up-close look at Apocalypseburg and movie fans can stand in the same place as characters from the film and imagine being in the action. LEGOLAND Model Makers have been reconstructing a piece of the set from the new movie for five months, working with Warner Bros.
  • IAN SEABROOK Underwater Director of Photography

    IAN SEABROOK Underwater Director of Photography

    IAN SEABROOK Underwater Director of Photography www.dorsalfin.net FEATURES DIRECTORS PRODUCERS/STUDIOS JUNGLE CRUISE Jaume Collet-Serra John Davis, John Fox, Danny Garcia, Hiram Garcia Disney IN THE SHADOW OF THE MOON Jim Mickle Rian Cahill, Brian Kavanaugh-Jones Linda Morgan, Ben Pugh / Netflix IT: CHAPTER 2 Andy Muschietti Seth Grahame-Smith, David Katzenberg, Roy Lee Dan Lin, Barbara Muscietti / Warner Bros. FONZO Josh Trank Russell Ackerman, Lawrence Bender Aaron L. Gilbert, John Schoenfelder / Universal ELI Ciaran Foy Trevor Macy, John Zaozirny / Paramount GLASS M. Night Shyamalan Mark Bienstock, Jason Blum, Ashwin Rajan Universal DEADPOOL 2 David Leitch Simon Kinberg, Lauren Shuler Donner / Fox PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: Joachim Rønning Jerry Bruckheimer / Disney DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES & Esper Sandberg MONSTER TRUCKS Chris Wedge Mary Parent, Denis Stewart / Paramount ALPHA Albert Hughes Andrew Rona / Sony BATMAN VS. SUPERMAN: Zack Snyder Charles Roven. Deborah Snyder / Warner Bros DAWN OF JUSTICE UNDER THE SILVER LAKE. David Robert Mitchell Chris Bender, Michael De Luca, Jake Weiner / A24 TULLY Jason Reitman Diablo Cody, A.J. Dix, Helen Estabrook Aaron L. Gilbert, Beth Kono, Mason Novick Paramount POWER RANGERS Dean Isrealite Marty Bowen, Wyck Godfrey/ Lionsgate THE EDGE OF SEVENTEEN Kelly Fremon Craig Julie Ansell, James L. Brooks, Richard Sakai / STX THE SHACK Stuart Hazeldine Brad Cummings, Gil Netter / Lionsgate THE 9TH LIFE OF LOUIS DRAX Alex Aja Tim Bricknell, Max Minghella Shawn Williamson Miramax AGE OF ADALINE Lee Toland Krieger Gary Lucchesi, Tom Rosenberg / Lionsgate GODZILLA Gareth Edwards Jon Jashni, Mary Parent / Legendary HECTOR & THE SEARCH FOR Peter Chelsom Christian Angermayer, Klaus Dohle, Trish Dolman HAPPINESS Phil Hunt, Judy Tossell / Screen Siren MAN OF STEEL Zack Snyder Charles Roven, Deborah Snyder, Emma Thomas Warner Bros.
  • The Search for Transitional Justice in Uganda: Global Dimensions

    The Search for Transitional Justice in Uganda: Global Dimensions

    The Search for Transitional Justice in Uganda: Global Dimensions A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Tessa Wright University of Canterbury 2011 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 5 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 9 Contrasting Meetings: Community Dialogue versus International Dialogue .......................... 9 Thesis conception: .................................................................................................................... 11 Research Agenda ................................................................................................................ 11 Thesis Argument ................................................................................................................. 13 Literary Contribution ......................................................................................................... 14 Critical Debates in the Field of Transitional Justice: Literature Review ................................ 15 Unraveling
  • WRITTEN QUESTION E-1182/03 by Marco Pannella (NI), Emma Bonino (NI), Marco Cappato (NI), Gianfranco Dell’Alba (NI) and Benedetto Della Vedova (NI) to the Commission

    WRITTEN QUESTION E-1182/03 by Marco Pannella (NI), Emma Bonino (NI), Marco Cappato (NI), Gianfranco Dell’Alba (NI) and Benedetto Della Vedova (NI) to the Commission

    8.4.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 88 E/341 (2004/C 88 E/0347) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1182/03 by Marco Pannella (NI), Emma Bonino (NI), Marco Cappato (NI), Gianfranco Dell’Alba (NI) and Benedetto Della Vedova (NI) to the Commission (1 April 2003) Subject: Individual cases of arbitrary arrest and torture of Montagnards (Degar) by the Vietnamese authorities On 15 March 2003, the Montagnard Foundation and ABC Radio Australia reported that, at around 7 a.m. on 24 February 2003, security officials arrested the following Montagnards (Degar) from the village of Buon Cuor Knia (Buon Don district, in the province of Dak Lac) who were members of the Transnational Radical Party: Y-Phan Buon Krong, born in 1950, Y-Be Nie, born in 1945, Y-Pen Buon Ya, born in 1970, Y-Glen Buon Krong, born in 1976 and Y-Gun Hwing, born in 1974. These persons were arrested because they were suspected of supporting the Montagnard Foundation, of being Christians and of collecting the names of Montagnards wishing to join an NGO with consultative status at the UN (the Transnational Radical Party), which promotes the enforcement of human rights world-wide by non-violent means. They were handcuffed and beaten unconscious with clubs and rocks in front of their relatives; in particular, the security officials repeatedly smashed the knees of Y-Phan Buon Krong and Y-Glen Buon Krong with a large rock. The five men were then taken to the Buon Don district prison. The Vietnamese officials who tortured each of them in turn are Nguyen Truong That and Pham Huu Nhat, both of whom had been sent to the Central Highlands by the government authorities in Hanoi.
  • Regeni Case, Bonino Writes to Macron: "Because Today We Are Embarrassed by the Legion of Honour As We Are by Al Sisi"

    Regeni Case, Bonino Writes to Macron: "Because Today We Are Embarrassed by the Legion of Honour As We Are by Al Sisi"

    REGENI CASE, BONINO WRITES TO MACRON: "BECAUSE TODAY WE ARE EMBARRASSED BY THE LEGION OF HONOUR AS WE ARE BY AL SISI". by Emma Bonino (Senator of the Italian Republic; Member of PGA) 14 DECEMBER 2020 This letter was translated into English by No Peace Without Justice (the NGO founded by Emma Bonino) Dear President, the awarding of the Legion of Honour to the President of the Egyptian Republic, Al Sisi, has aroused in me and throughout my country great shock and deep indignation. You are perfectly familiar with the entire case involving our fellow citizen Giulio Regeni, who was arrested on 26 January 2016 and brutally tortured for nine days until his murder, as has been proven by a judicial enquiry conducted by the Rome Public Prosecutor's Office. On the other hand, you cannot ignore the Egyptian situation in which the same fate was reserved for over a thousand Regeni, who suffered the same fate as the young Italian, disappearing in the regime's prisons, many of them without charge or trial. I do not know the reasons for awarding this honour. But whatever they may be, in view of this situation and the responsibilities of the Egyptian President and his government, they are unacceptable. I know perfectly well that France, like Italy and other European and non-European countries, has important economic, commercial and geostrategic balance interests to safeguard in its relations with Egypt, but there must also be a limit to the considerations of realpolitik. And on the part of a country like France, which at the end of the eighteenth century gave the world the first declaration of human rights, respect for human rights and their universality should be taken into account at least in the same way as economic and geopolitical interests.