DOCSLIB.ORG

Dear Friends

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dear Friends, Greetings from the Project on Middle East Democracy! Last week, Syrian violence and repression continued as Secretary Clinton announced President Assad had lost his legitimacy. Secretary Clinton also announced U.S. recognition of the Transitional National Council in Libya. Analysts debated the legitimacy of the National Dialogue in Bahrain amidst continued government repression. Meanwhile, popular frustration continues to mount in Egypt at the slow pace of reform. Look for next week to be dominated by increased international pressure on President Assad in Syria, as well as working toward a negotiated settlement in Libya. For more detailed coverage of the debates surrounding U.S. foreign policy and the prospects for democracy in the Middle East, be sure to check out our blog, the POMED Wire. Also, POMED's Weekly Wire is now available in Arabic - to register to receive the Arabic version by email, please click here. The Weekly Wire July 18, 2011 Legislation No relevant legislation was discussed this week. Committee Hearings The Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia held the first of two hearings on “Promoting Peace? Re-examining U.S. Aid to the Palestinian Authority.” The hearing was presided over by Chairman Steve Chabot (R-OH), and ranking member Gary Ackerman (D- NY). The witnesses were Jacob Walles, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs; Lieutenant General Michael Moeller; and George A. Laudato, USAID Administrator’s Special Assistant for the Middle East. The U.S. House of Representatives Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a hearing on human rights in Syria. The witnesses were Michael Posner, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor; Andrew Tabler, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy; Radwan Ziadeh, the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy; Mona Yacoubian, the U.S. Institute for Peace Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention; and Mara Karlin, Instructor in Strategic Studies at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. From Washington Syrian Regime Condemned: The U.N. Security Council condemned the attacks on U.S. and French embassies. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that President Bashar al-Assad has lost legitimacy and is “not indispensable.” President Barack Obama said that Assad is increasingly losing legitimacy with his people. The New York Times argued that the U.S. has now “turned decisively” against Syria. U.S. Ambassador Robert Ford said that he has seen “no evidence” of the regime’s willingness to reform, and rejected the possibility of being recalled from Syria. French Prime Minister François Fillon suggested that Assad is losing power; he joined Western powers in calling for the U.N. Security Council to take action, and said that Syria has “gone beyond all boundaries.” French President Nicolas Sarkozy demanded more sanctions against the regime. Debating Action in Syria: Andrew Tabler noted that Assad’s regime is disintegrating but a transition “is going to take a long time.” The Washington Post Editorial Board and Max Boot praised U.S. Ambassador Robert Ford and called for the U.S. to continue pressuring the Syrian regime. The Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) released a fact sheet outlining steps the U.S. can take to ensure Assad’s speedy exit. Stephen Cook noted that the state-supported dialogue was not a credible step towards democracy, and predicted that the military will be a decisive factor in resolving the conflict. Soner Cagaptay and Andrew Tabler recommend the U.S. and Turkey work to pressure the Syrian regime and to prepare for post-Assad Syria. Soner Cagaptay also speculated on the domestic and international impact of Turkey invading Syria. Gareth Jenkins noted the worsening relationship between Turkey and Syria, and the economic difficulties of this deterioration. U.S. Recognizes TNC: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced full recognition of the Transitional National Council (TNC). The remaining members of the Libya Contact Group will recognize the TNC as well. Chinese and Russian representatives declined the invitation from Turkey to attend the Contact Group meeting, where representatives were expected to develop a political plan to end hostilities in Libya. Debate on Negotiations in Libya: A French spokesperson denied reports of direct negotiations with the Libyan government, but acknowledged that indirect contact had been made and that the rebels should begin negotiations. In response, the State Department reiterated that Gadhafi must leave and the Libyan people must decide how the transition proceeds. Con Coughlin argued that NATO countries are losing their resolve. Skepticism on Gadhafi Exit: New intelligence reports indicated that Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi may be ready to negotiate a settlement. Le Figaro reported that Prime Minister Baghdadi al-Mahmoudi expressed willingness to negotiate unconditionally after a ceasefire. Other reports indicated a desire for Saif al-Islam to play a role in post-conflict Libya. French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé said that Gadhafi’s exit is still not certain. U.S. State Department Spokesperson Victoria Nuland remained skeptical. U.S. on Egypt Transition: A U.S. State Department Spokesperson reiterated U.S. support for “a transparent, participatory process that is inclusive and open. The sequence and timing is up to the Egyptian people.” Analyst Dina Guirguis described the continuing frustration regarding the pace of constitutional change as well as the major political divisions. Prospects for Yemen: Jeb Boone argued that the next Yemeni government “will face the almost insurmountable task of recreating a state out of a county that has descended into regional control.” Bernard Haykel asserted that no viable future leaders exist, a national unity government is the best possible outcome, and even then democracy is not a guarantee. Criticism on Bahrain: Mehdi Hasan condemned the international community’s failure to act against Bahrain. Human Rights First condemned emerging reports of the torture and abuse of Bahraini football players. And Brian Dooley said that activists are wary that the National Dialogue is “elaborate play-acting for the international community’s benefit,” and the international investigation will be ineffective. Moroccan Reform Discussed: Ahmed Charai and Joseph Braude lauded the Moroccan referendum as highly significant, but Human Rights Watch was more skeptical, noting that violence continues and promises for reform have yet to be realized. Supporting Democracy and Foreign Aid: Ted Piccone argued that the global democracy community gained a second wind at the recent Community of Democracies meeting. Former members of Congress Tom Daschle and Tom Ridge defended the importance of foreign aid and diplomacy in promoting economic growth, national security, and conflict prevention. Iranian Dissent and Power Struggles: Alireza Nader discussed the growing rift between Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Revolutionary Guards, who have reportedly been instructed by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to “help set the conditions for next year’s parliamentary elections as well as future elections.” Geneive Abdo released the “New Green Movement Manifesto.” Also Worth Reading Human Rights First issued a new report on the Bahraini regime’s continued intimidation, torture, and detention of activists, and violence against civilians. The International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) released a detailed report on Tunisia’s new election process. International Crisis Group issued an analysis of “The Syrian Regime’s Slow-motion Suicide.” From the Middle East Ongoing Protests in Egypt: In an effort to meet demands resulting from protests that began last week in Cairo, Alexandria and the Suez region, the Egyptian Supreme Council for the Armed Forces (SCAF) announced that they have postponed parliamentary elections scheduled for September, which garnered support from several political parties. Also, SCAF dismissed or reassigned 669 police personnel associated with the deaths of nearly 900 protesters in the February demonstrations. There is no word on how the interim plans are proceeding with trials of Mubarak-era officials accused of opening fire on demonstrators (which Hosni Mubarak denied that he ordered). At least eight have been injured in recent protests, according a report by al-Jazeera. Demonstrators demand swifter reforms or threatened “further escalation” will take place; Prime Minister Essam Sharaf claimed that he supports the people’s right to demonstrate but that protests must not disrupt the rest of the public. And Omar Ismail also brought protests abroad when he asked to demonstrate in front of the British cabinet to call for a freezing of assets of those associated with the Mubarak regime. Syrian Protest Movement Gains Momentum: Protests escalated throughout the week. Forces stormed the central city of Homs, killing two and injured 20. Friday saw at least 14 deaths and the shutdown of phone and internet services. A harsher and continued crackdown is feared as a result of mounting international pressure and a shift in U.S. rhetoric. It is estimated that 1,750 civilians and security personnel have been killed and 12,000 arrested since the uprisings began. A report emerged of security forces beating a handicapped man. Political Developments in Syria: U.S. and French embassies in Syria were attacked, resulting in considerable building damage and anti-American graffiti referring
Recommended publications
  • Omar-Ashour-English.Pdf

    Omar-Ashour-English.Pdf

    CENTER ON DEMOCRACY, DEVELOPMENT, AND THE RULE OF LAW STANFORD UNIVERSITY BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER - STANFORD PROJECT ON ARAB TRANSITIONS PAPER SERIES Number 3, November 2012 FROM BAD COP TO GOOD COP: THE CHALLENGE OF SECURITY SECTOR REFORM IN EGYPT OMAR ASHOUR PROGRAM ON ARAB REFORM AND DEMOCRACY, CDDRL FROM BAD COP TO GOOD COP: THE CHALLENGE OF SECURITY SECTOR REFORM IN EGYPT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY gence within the police force of a cadre of reform- ist officers is also encouraging and may help shift Successful democratic transitions hinge on the the balance of power within the Ministry of Interi- establishment of effective civilian control of the or. These officers have established reformist orga- armed forces and internal security institutions. The nizations, such as the General Coalition of Police transformation of these institutions from instru- Officers and Officers But Honorable, and begun to ments of brutal repression and regime protection push for SSR themselves. The prospects for imple- to professional, regulated, national services – secu- menting these civil society and internal initiatives, rity sector reform (SSR) – is at the very center of however, remain uncertain; they focus on admira- this effort. In Egypt, as in other transitioning Arab ble ends but are less clear on the means of imple- states and prior cases of democratization, SSR is mentation. They also have to reckon with strong an acutely political process affected by an array of elements within the Ministry of Interior – “al-Ad- different actors and dynamics. In a contested and ly’s men” (in reference to Mubarak’s longstanding unstable post-revolutionary political sphere, the minister) – who remain firmly opposed to reform.
  • Contemporary Anti-Semitism: an Urgent Challenge

    Contemporary Anti-Semitism: an Urgent Challenge

    Contemporary Anti-Semitism: An Urgent Challenge MARY ROBINSON Director Ethical Globalization Initiative An Interview with Priya Bindra, Jesse Finkelstein, and Julia Kay; and an Abridged Transcript Brown University, 8 November 2004 The Honorable Mary Robinson was the first female President of Ireland, serving from 1990 to 1997, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, from 1997 to 2002. She is currently Director ofthe Ethical Globalization Initiative, which aims to foster more equitable international trade and development, strengthen responses to HIV/AIDS in Africa, and shape more humane miration policies. Brown Journal of World Affairs: You are speaking today about contemporary anti- Semitism in Europe. Do you think this is a global phenomenon, or is it solely a Euro- pean problem? Mary Robinson: I think it a global phenomenon. It just happens to be particularly virulent in Europe, and I have been conscious of that for a number of years. This is not the first time I am speaking about this; as Commissioner, I wrote to the foreign minis- tries of a number of European governments in 2002 asking them to take more active steps. It was of course the Nazi period in Europe that was one ofthe darkest moments of anti-Semitism, and was what led to global recognition ofthe problem. It prompted the recognition that the world needed a United Nations Charter, and I recall that the Jewish community here in the United States played a very significant role in the draft- Copyrigbt © 2005 by the Brown Journal of World Affairs WINTER/SPRING 2005 • VOLUME XI, ISSUE 2 MARY ROBINSON ing of that charter.
  • United States of America

    United States of America

    United Nations A/HRC/16/11 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2011 Original: English Human Rights Council Sixteenth session Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* United States of America * Previously issued as document A/HRC/WG.6/9/L.9. The annex to the present report is circulated as received. GE.11-10069 A/HRC/16/11 Contents Paragraphs Page Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–4 3 I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process................................................ 5–91 3 A. Presentation by the State under review........................................................... 6–7 3 B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review........................ 8–91 4 II. Conclusions and/or recommendations..................................................................... 92–94 13 Annex Composition of the delegation ......................................................................................................... 29 2 A/HRC/16/11 Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its ninth session from 1 to 12 November 2010. The review of the United States of America was held at the 9th meeting, on 5 November 2010. The delegation of the United States of America was headed jointly by the Honourable Esther Brimmer, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of International
  • The Political Economy of the New Egyptian Republic

    The Political Economy of the New Egyptian Republic

    ﺑﺤﻮث اﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮة ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌﻠﻮم اﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ Hopkins The Political Economy of اﻹﻗﺘﺼﺎد اﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻰ the New Egyptian Republic ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮرﻳﺔ اﳉﺪﻳﺪة ﻓﻰ ﻣﺼﺮ The Political Economy of the New Egyptian of the New Republic Economy The Political Edited by ﲢﺮﻳﺮ Nicholas S. Hopkins ﻧﻴﻜﻮﻻس ﻫﻮﺑﻜﻨﺰ Contributors اﳌﺸﺎرﻛﻮن Deena Abdelmonem Zeinab Abul-Magd زﻳﻨﺐ أﺑﻮ اﻟﺪ دﻳﻨﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ اﳌﻨﻌﻢ Yasmine Ahmed Sandrine Gamblin ﺳﺎﻧﺪرﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﺒﻼن ﻳﺎﺳﻤﲔ أﺣﻤﺪ Ellis Goldberg Clement M. Henry ﻛﻠﻴﻤﻨﺖ ﻫﻨﺮى إﻟﻴﺲ ﺟﻮﻟﺪﺑﻴﺮج SOCIAL SCIENCE IN CAIRO PAPERS Dina Makram-Ebeid Hans Christian Korsholm Nielsen ﻫﺎﻧﺰ ﻛﺮﻳﺴﺘﻴﺎن ﻛﻮرﺷﻠﻢ ﻧﻴﻠﺴﻦ دﻳﻨﺎ ﻣﻜﺮم ﻋﺒﻴﺪ David Sims دﻳﭭﻴﺪ ﺳﻴﻤﺰ Volume ﻣﺠﻠﺪ 33 ٣٣ Number ﻋﺪد 4 ٤ ﻟﻘﺪ اﺛﺒﺘﺖ ﺑﺤﻮث اﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮة ﻓﻰ اﻟﻌﻠﻮم اﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ أﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﻞ ﻻ ﻏﻨﻰ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ اﻟﻘﺎرئ اﻟﻌﺎدى واﳌﺘﺨﺼﺺ ﻓﻰ ﺷﺌﻮن CAIRO PAPERS IN SOCIAL SCIENCE is a valuable resource for Middle East specialists اﻟﺸﺮق اﻷوﺳﻂ. وﺗﻌﺮض ﻫﺬه اﻟﻜﺘﻴﺒﺎت اﻟﺮﺑﻊ ﺳﻨﻮﻳﺔ - اﻟﺘﻰ ﺗﺼﺪر ﻣﻨﺬ ﻋﺎم ١٩٧٧ - ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ اﻟﺒﺤﻮث اﻟﺘﻰ ﻗﺎم ﺑﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺣﺜﻮن and non-specialists. Published quarterly since 1977, these monographs present the results of ﻣﺤﻠﻴﻮن وزاﺋﺮون ﻓﻰ ﻣﺠﺎﻻت ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ اﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎت اﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ واﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎدﻳﺔ واﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ واﻟﺘﺎرﻳﺨﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮق اﻷوﺳﻂ. ,current research on a wide range of social, economic, and political issues in the Middle East وﺗﺮﺣﺐ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﲢﺮﻳﺮ ﺑﺤﻮث اﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮة ﺑﺎﳌﻘﺎﻻت اﳌﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﻬﺬه اﻟﺎﻻت ﻟﻠﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﻰ ﻣﺪى ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ. وﻳﺮاﻋﻰ ان ﻳﻜﻮن اﻟﺒﺤﺚ .and include historical perspectives ﻓﻰ ﺣﺪود ١٥٠ ﺻﻔﺤﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺗﺮك ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺘﲔ ﺑﲔ اﻟﺴﻄﻮر، وﺗﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻧﺴﺨﺔ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺔ وأﺧﺮى ﻋﻠﻰ اﺳﻄﻮاﻧﺔ ﻛﻤﺒﻴﻮﺗﺮ (ﻣﺎﻛﻨﺘﻮش Submissions of studies relevant to these areas are invited. Manuscripts submitted should be أو ﻣﻴﻜﺮوﺳﻮﻓﺖ وورد). أﻣﺎ ﺑﺨﺼﻮص ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ اﳌﺮاﺟﻊ، ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ان ﺗﺘﻮاﻓﻖ ﻣﻊ اﻟﺸﻜﻞ اﳌﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻰ ﻛﺘﺎب ”اﻻﺳﻠﻮب ﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ around 150 doublespaced typewritten pages in hard copy and on disk (Macintosh or Microsoft ﺷﻴﻜﺎﻏﻮ“ (The Chicago Manual of Style) ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻜﻮن اﻟﻬﻮاﻣﺶ ﻓﻰ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺻﻔﺤﺔ، أو اﻟﺸﻜﻞ اﳌﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻰ Word).
  • Reforming Myanmar's Military

    Reforming Myanmar's Military

    Reforming Myanmar’s Military BY ERIN MURPHY, MATTHEW TURPIN, AND PETER KUCIK he developing relationship between the U.S. and Myanmar represents one of the most positive foreign policy shifts in recent memory. Myanmar is one of few former despotic T nations to have “unclenched its fist” and now enjoys generally positive international sup- port. With the U.S. actively engaged in civil capacity building efforts, the people of Myanmar are testing their new freedom of speech to debate nearly all facets of their public and private sectors. The path to democratic and economic reform, begun in 2011, will likely be rocky, but the positive momentum is clear. There is however one glaring omission in U.S. efforts to help Myanmar: assistance in reform- ing its military institutions. Critics of comprehensive military assistance suggest that conducting military-to-military engagement offers something for nothing, as the Myanmar military has shown few signs of reform. With ongoing human rights abuses, the U.S. should not provide any benefits to Myanmar’s military through enhanced ties. Additionally, some critics believe that U.S. military assistance will simply result in making Myanmar’s military better at abusing the civilian popula- tion and will give them the tools to undermine democratic and economic reforms. While these are legitimate concerns, direct military-to-military engagement with Myanmar is a critical part of the overall reform effort. Ignoring this crucial segment of Myanmar’s society risks undermining the long-term stability and development of the country. As the military is Myanmar’s most powerful institution, the U.S.
  • Youth and the 25Th Revolution in Egypt: Agents of Change and Its Multiple Meanings

    Youth and the 25Th Revolution in Egypt: Agents of Change and Its Multiple Meanings

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AUC Knowledge Fountain (American Univ. in Cairo) American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Theses and Dissertations 2-1-2012 Youth and the 25th Revolution in Egypt: agents of change and its multiple meanings Dina El Sharnouby Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds Recommended Citation APA Citation El Sharnouby, D. (2012).Youth and the 25th Revolution in Egypt: agents of change and its multiple meanings [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1131 MLA Citation El Sharnouby, Dina. Youth and the 25th Revolution in Egypt: agents of change and its multiple meanings. 2012. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1131 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The American University in Cairo School of Humanities and Social Sciences Youth and the 25th Revolution in Egypt: Agents of Change and its Multiple Meanings A Thesis Submitted to The Department of Sociology, Anthropology, Psychology, and Egyptology In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts In Sociology-Anthropology By Dina El- Sharnouby Under the Supervision of Dr. Hanan Sabea January 2012 The American University in Cairo Youth and the 25th Revolution in Egypt: Agents of Change and its Multiple Meanings A Thesis Submitted by Dina El- Sharnouby To the Sociology/Anthropology Program January 2012 In partial fulfillment of the requirements for The degree of Master of Arts Has been approved by Dr.
  • Egypt in Transition the Third Republic

    Egypt in Transition the Third Republic

    Egypt in Transition The Third Republic BY M. CHERIF BASSIOUNI n January 25, 2011, the Egyptian people took to the streets and in 18 days were able to bring down the 30-year corrupt dictatorial regime of Hosni Mubarak, using entirely Opeaceful means. That revolution set the Arab Republic of Egypt on a hopeful path to democracy. After Mubarak resigned, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) became the custodian of the transition. In June of 2012, in Egypt’s first free and fair presidential election, Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohammed Morsi was elected President. Slightly more than 50 percent of registered voters actually voted, and those voters gave Morsi a majority of just less than 52 percent. Having won by this slim margin, Morsi was sworn in as President on June 30, 2012, and thus the Second Republic came to be.1 He was removed by the military on July 3, 2013 and a temporary President, Adly Mansour, was appointed on July 4, 2013. Thus began the Third Republic. The Second Republic Five months later, Morsi declared his decisions beyond judicial review, and thus his authority unchallengeable. In December, 2012, he pushed a pro-Islamist constitution through a popular referendum; it passed but with less than 30 percent of the popular vote. There was no constitu- tional way to recall, impeach, or remove Morsi. The path to democracy was taking a turn towards theocratic autocracy. The serving People’s Assembly (Majliss al-Sha‘ab) had been elected under a law later declared unconstitutional. Over 60 percent of the members of the new parliament were Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and Salafists.
  • 'Bread, Dignity and Social Justice': the Political

    'Bread, Dignity and Social Justice': the Political

    briefing paper page 1 ‘Bread, Dignity and Social Justice’: The Political Economy of Egypt’s Transition Jane Kinninmont Middle East and North Africa Programme | April 2012 | MENAP BP 2012/01 Summary points zz In Egypt’s 2011 uprising, political and economic grievances were closely linked in attempts to address complex problems of corruption and injustice. But the cross- class, cross-ideology coalition that united behind the uprising has predictably fragmented, and different groups now have divergent views on the applicability of liberal economic policies to Egypt. zz The Islamist parties which between them won a majority in the 2011–12 parliamentary election appear to favour the continuation of a broadly pro-market policy, although, like all parties, they have emphasized the need for greater ‘social justice’ and less corruption. Leftist groups and trade unions remain largely unrepresented in parliament and tensions may be brewing between labour and Islamist forces over economic policy. zz Uncertainty over future economic policy is currently deterring investment. Although economic policy was not the main focus in the parliamentary election campaign, there is a pressing need for all parties to develop their economic blueprints further. zz Debates over the role of the state, the free market and the nature of globalization are part of democratic self-determination. Rather than repeating old mantras about the intrinsic desirability of a smaller public sector, external actors need to remember that economic policy advice on the role of the state is not purely technical but value-laden. www.chathamhouse.org ‘Bread, Dignity and Social Justice’: The Political Economy of Egypt’s Transition page 2 Introduction and revealed the transformative potential of street protest, When a popular uprising overthrew President Hosni bottom-up coalition-building and mass campaigning.
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 149 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 No. 124—Part II House of Representatives MOTION TO INSTRUCT CONFEREES aration pay and hostile fire pay. I keep As a former soldier, as a member of the ON H.R. 1588, NATIONAL DEFENSE asking myself, Why? Our government House Armed Services Committee, as an AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FIS- is giving away billions of dollars to American, as a human being . I am ap- CAL YEAR 2004—Continued help other countries and millions just palled at the insensitivity of the administration for information. Yet they are going to b 2100 in not adequately providing hazard pay for our cut our benefits by $225. If anything, soldiers at a time when our mission in Iraq is Mr. EDWARDS. Mr. Speaker, I yield our military should be getting paid not yet accomplished. Nor, more importantly, myself the balance of my time. more, not less.’’ is our mission in the larger war on terror. First let me again thank the gen- The second letter, reflecting also the I very much understand the dynamic that tleman from New York (Mr. MCHUGH) confusion out there across our military led us to this place—this nation simply cannot for his incredible leadership year in families: ‘‘Congressman, is it true that afford the cost to our Nation to wage a world- and year out to our servicemen and the government is trying to make ob- wide war, and raise taxes on our children -women.
  • September 6, 2012 the Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton

    September 6, 2012 the Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton

    September 6, 2012 The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton Secretary of State United States Department of State 2201 C St, NW Washington, DC 20520 Dear Secretary Clinton, We are writing to encourage the United States delegation to the United Nations to oppose the Bahraini government’s nomination of Saeed Mohammed al-Faihani for a seat on the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Advisory Committee. We call on you to clearly oppose al-Faihani’s nomination, as his position on the committee would undercut U.S. efforts to bolster the reputation and credibility of that body and undermine the independence of the Advisory Committee. Al-Faihani has held a number of positions in the Bahraini government, notably in the Foreign Ministry and Ministry of Human Rights. Most recently, in August 2011, al-Faihani was appointed by the King of Bahrain to serve as an “agent” ( ) for human rights in the Ministry of Human Rights and Social Development. Paragraph 68 of HRC resolution 5/1 provides that "Individuals holding decision-making positions in Government or any other organization or entity which might give rise to a conflict of interest with responsibilities inherent to the mandate shall be excluded." Further, in its sixth session, the Human Rights Council adopted decision 6/102 describing the technical and objective requirements for the submission of candidatures, including "independence and impartiality." Al-Faihani’s current position and career stand in clear contradiction to this requirement, severely undermine his credibility as an expert, and make him a liability to the Advisory Committee and the Council. At every level, al-Faihani has supported government-led efforts to downplay and deny human rights violations.
  • Press Release

    Press Release

    AFRICAN UNION UNION AFRICAINE UNIÃO AFRICANA Press Release Chairperson meets in Cairo with Prime Minister of Egypt Addis Ababa, 4 September, 2011 – The Chairperson of the African Union Commission (AUC), Dr. Jean Ping, who is currently visiting Cairo, met, today 04 September, 2011, with the Prime Minister of Egypt, Dr. Essam Sharaf. The Chairperson commended Egypt for its engagement with the rest of the continent and its constructive role within the African Union. In this regard, he referred to the recent pledge made by the Government of Egypt during the AU Pledging Conference for countries of Horn of Africa affected by drought and famine. He also expressed the AU’s gratitude for hosting the AU High Level Retreat, for the second time. The theme for this years’ retreat was “Strengthening political Governance for Peace, Security and Stability in Africa”, making it relevant especially following the recent revolution in Egypt. He expressed confidence that the political transition process in Egypt was on track and hoped that it would successfully culminate in the genuine democratization of the country. Prime Minister Sharaf reiterated Egypt’s commitment to Africa, and expressed satisfaction at the Commission’s efforts to further strengthen cooperation ties between Member States reaffirming Egypt’s continued support to the AU. The Chairperson and the Prime Minister exchanged views on a range of issues of mutual concern, including the Palestinian question, the latest developments in Libya, , as well as the situation in Somalia and Sudan, and agreed to continue working closely together in search of lasting peace in these countries. Present at the meeting, among others, were: the Minister of International Cooperation and the Assistant Foreign Minister in charge of African Affairs, in addition to the Head of the AU Office in Cairo.
  • More Than Money: Post-Mubarak Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf

    More Than Money: Post-Mubarak Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf

    More than Money: Post-Mubarak Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf GRC PAPER More than Money: Post-Mubarak Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf Yasmine Farouk GRC GULF PAPER April 2014 Gulf Research Center Yasmine Farouk More than Money: Post-Mubarak Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf © Gulf Research Center 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means,© Gulf electronic, Research mechanical, Center 2013 photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Gulf Research Center. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmittedThe opinions in anyexpressed form orin bythis any publication means, electronic, are those mechanical, of the author photocopying, alone and do recording not state oror otherwise,reflect the withoutopinions the prior or position permission of the of Gulfthe Gulf Research Research Center. Center. Gulf Research Center More than Money: Post-Mubarak Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf GRC PAPER More than Money: Post-Mubarak Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf *1 Yasmine Farouk gypt-Gulf relations are constructed as “organic” among the ruling elites and societies on both sides.1 The Egyptian Supreme Council for Armed Forces issued a statement two months after President Hosni Mubarak’s fall to confirm the persistence of this mutual perception.2 Yet, Mubarak’s ouster Eprogressively instigated a crisis in Egypt-GCC relations. The crisis questioned the traditional perception of Egypt and the Arab Gulf countries as bound within the same security complex.3 It disrupted the conventional patterns of relations with a special focus on the financial channel of interaction.