DOCSLIB.ORG

Northolt Mandeville School Site, Eastcote Lane North

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northolt Mandeville School Site, Eastcote Lane North Riverside Energy Park Environmental Statement Technical Appendices APPENDIX: PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE NUMBER: EN010093 DOCUMENT REFERENCE: C.2 STACK MODELLING November 2018 Revision 0 APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 | Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 C.2.1Baseline Point Sources and Emissions Table C.2.1.1 Input Parameters for Point Sources Modelled for Baseline Concentrations Crossness Sewage Sludge Riverside Resource Source Name Incinerator Recovery Facility OS Grid Co-ordinate X 549150 549700 OS Grid Co-ordinate Y 180740 180574 Stack height (m) 60 90 Diameter (m) 1.27 3.93 Flue gas temperature (°C) 120 129 Exit Velocity (m/s) 26.1 21 Table C.2.1.2 Modelled Emission Rates for Baseline Point Sources Emission Rate (g/s) Crossness Sewage Sludge Riverside Resource Pollutant Incinerator Recovery Facility Arsenic 3.2 x 10-5 0.003 Benzene - 1.53 Benzo(a)pyrene 3.2 x 10-5 1.4 x 10-5 Cadmium 3.2 x 10-5 0.008 Chromium VI - 2.0 x 10-5 Lead 0.003 0.077 Manganese - 0.077 Nickel - 0.077 Nitrogen Dioxide 3.2 0.21 Particulates (PM10/PM2.5) 0.3 1.53 Office Address: 10 Queen Square, Bristol, BS1 4NT T: +44 (0)117 332 7840 E: [email protected] C.2.2 Impact of ERF Emissions – Human Receptors Table C.2.2.1 Predicted Annual Arsenic Concentrations Sensitive REP + PC Background IAQM Human REP PC RRRF + Total PEC PEC (%) of (2016) Significa Receptor (µg/m3) Crossness (µg/m3) (%) EAL (µg/m3) nce ID (µg/m3 ) R1 7.42 x 10-5 2.47% 1.13 x 10-4 1.10 x 10-3 36.7% Negligible R2 7.67 x 10-5 2.56% 9.87 x 10-5 1.09 x 10-3 36.3% Negligible R3 7.98 x 10-5 2.66% 1.33 x 10-4 1.12 x 10-3 37.4% Negligible R4 2.82 x 10-5 0.94% 6.04 x 10-5 1.05 x 10-3 35.0% Negligible R5 8.98 x 10-5 2.99% 1.30 x 10-4 1.12 x 10-3 37.3% Negligible R6 7.30 x 10-5 2.43% 1.51 x 10-4 1.14 x 10-3 38.0% Negligible R7 1.29 x 10-4 4.31% 2.29 x 10-4 1.22 x 10-3 40.6% Negligible R8 1.69 x 10-4 5.65% 2.53 x 10-4 1.24 x 10-3 41.4% Minor R8B 1.66 x 10-4 5.54% 2.55 x 10-4 1.24E-03 41.5% Minor R9 2.66 x 10-5 0.89% 3.96 x 10-5 1.03 x 10-3 34.3% Negligible R10 2.42 x 10-5 0.81% 3.56 x 10-5 1.02 x 10-3 34.2% Negligible R11 9.65 x 10-5 3.22% 1.45 x 10-4 1.13 x 10-3 37.8% Negligible R12 2.87 x 10-5 0.96% 4.27 x 10-5 1.03 x 10-3 34.4% Negligible R13 3.27 x 10-5 1.09% 5.02 x 10-5 1.04 x 10-3 34.6% Negligible R14 2.74 x 10-5 0.91% 4.17 x 10-5 1.03 x 10-3 34.4% Negligible R15 8.63 x 10-5 2.88% 1.28 x 10-4 1.12 x 10-3 37.2% Negligible 9.9 x 10-4 -5 -4 -3 R16 7.42 x 10 2.47% 1.19 x 10 1.11 x 10 36.9% Negligible -5 -4 -3 R16B 6.82 x 10 2.27% 1.09 x 10 1.10 x 10 36.6% Negligible -5 -4 -3 R17 8.38 x 10 2.79% 1.20 x 10 1.11 x 10 37.0% Negligible -4 -4 -3 R18A 1st 1.37 x 10 4.58% 2.40 x 10 1.23 x 10 41.0% Negligible -4 -4 -3 R18B 4th 1.38 x 10 4.58% 2.40 x 10 1.23 x 10 41.0% Negligible -4 -4 -3 R19A 1st 1.12 x 10 3.75% 1.35 x 10 1.12 x 10 37.5% Negligible -4 -4 -3 R19B 6th 1.14 x 10 3.81% 1.39 x 10 1.13 x 10 37.6% Negligible -4 -4 -3 R20A GF 1.35 x 10 4.50% 2.39 x 10 1.23 x 10 40.9% Negligible -4 -4 -3 R20B 5th 1.35 x 10 4.51% 2.40 x 10 1.23 x 10 41.0% Negligible -5 -5 -3 R21 2.45 x 10 0.82% 3.68 x 10 1.03 x 10 34.2% Negligible -4 -4 -3 R22 1.22 x 10 4.06% 2.09 x 10 1.20 x 10 39.9% Negligible -5 -5 -3 R23 3.82 x 10 1.27% 6.29 x 10 1.05 x 10 35.1% Negligible -5 -5 -3 R24 2.38 x 10 0.79% 3.95 x 10 1.03 x 10 34.3% Negligible -5 -5 -3 R25 2.34 x 10 0.78% 3.90 x 10 1.03 x 10 34.3% Negligible -5 -3 R26 5.43 x 10 1.81% 8.42E-05 1.07 x 10 35.8% Negligible -3 R27 1.33 x 10-5 0.44% 2.28 x 10-5 1.01 x 10 33.7% Negligible Office Address: 10 Queen Square, Bristol, BS1 4NT T: +44 (0)117 332 7840 E: [email protected] Table C.2.2.2 Predicted Annual Average Benzene Concentrations REP + Sensitive Background RRRF + Total IAQM REP PC PC PEC Human (2016) Crossn PEC Significan (µg/m3) (%) (%) Receptor ID (µg/m3) ess (µg/m3) ce (µg/m3 ) R1 2.97 x 10-2 0.59% 6.20 x 10-1 0.0492 0.6694 13.39% Negligible R2 3.07 x 10-2 0.61% 6.27 x 10-1 0.0416 0.6687 13.37% Negligible R3 3.19 x 10-2 0.64% 6.84 x 10-1 0.0583 0.7424 14.85% Negligible R4 1.13 x 10-2 0.23% 4.27 x 10-1 0.0276 0.4545 9.09% Negligible R5 3.59 x 10-2 0.72% 6.45 x 10-1 0.0557 0.7005 14.01% Negligible R6 2.92 x 10-2 0.58% 4.39 x 10-1 0.0685 0.5079 10.16% Negligible R7 5.17 x 10-2 1.03% 5.52 x 10-1 0.1020 0.6541 13.08% Negligible R8 6.78 x 10-2 1.36% 5.61 x 10-1 0.1096 0.6708 13.42% Negligible R8B 6.65 x 10-2 1.33% 7.00 x 10-1 0.1110 0.6722 13.44% Negligible R9 1.07 x 10-2 0.21% 5.90 x 10-1 0.0171 0.7171 14.34% Negligible R10 9.70 x 10-3 0.19% 5.61 x 10-1 0.0154 0.6058 12.12% Negligible R11 3.86 x 10-2 0.77% 7.11 x 10-1 0.0628 0.6241 12.48% Negligible R12 1.15 x 10-2 0.23% 9.06 x 10-1 0.0184 0.7292 14.58% Negligible R13 1.31 x 10-2 0.26% 7.11 x 10-1 0.0218 0.9273 18.55% Negligible R14 1.09 x 10-2 0.22% 5.61 x 10-1 0.0181 0.7289 14.58% Negligible R15 3.45 x 10-2 0.69% 6.20 x 10-1 0.0555 0.6167 12.33% Negligible R16 2.97 x 10-2 0.59% 6.45 x 10-1 0.0519 0.6721 13.44% Negligible R16B 2.73 x 10-2 0.55% 5.52 x 10-1 0.0475 0.6677 13.35% Negligible R17 3.35 x 10-2 0.67% 5.61 x 10-1 0.0514 0.6962 13.92% Negligible R18A 1st 5.49 x 10-2 1.10% 6.20 x 10-1 0.1066 0.6587 13.17% Negligible R18B 4th 5.50 x 10-2 1.10% 6.27 x 10-1 0.1069 0.6590 13.18% Negligible R19A 1st 4.50 x 10-2 0.90% 6.27 x 10-1 0.0559 0.6830 13.66% Negligible R19B 6th 4.58 x 10-2 0.92% 5.52 x 10-1 0.0580 0.6851 13.70% Negligible R20A GF 5.40 x 10-2 1.08% 5.52 x 10-1 0.1065 0.6586 13.17% Negligible R20B 5th 5.42 x 10-2 1.08% 5.52 x 10-1 0.1069 0.6591 13.18% Negligible R21 9.79 x 10-3 0.20% 6.99 x 10-1 0.0159 0.7146 14.29% Negligible R22 4.87 x 10-2 0.97% 5.52 x 10-1 0.0927 0.6449 12.90% Negligible R23 1.53 x 10-2 0.31% 6.46 x 10-1 0.0276 0.6734 13.47% Negligible R24 9.53 x 10-3 0.19% 6.27 x 10-1 0.0174 0.6442 12.88% Negligible R25 9.38 x 10-3 0.19% 6.27 x 10-1 0.0172 0.6439 12.88% Negligible R26 2.17 x 10-2 0.43% 6.83 x 10-1 0.0365 0.7200 14.40% Negligible R27 5.32 x 10-3 0.11% 6.25 x 10-1 0.0101 0.6353 12.71% Negligible Office Address: 10 Queen Square, Bristol, BS1 4NT T: +44 (0)117 332 7840 E: [email protected] Table C.2.2.3 Predicted Annual Average Benzo(a)pyrene Concentrations Sensitive REP + Background IAQM Human REP PC PC RRRF + Total PEC PEC (2016) Significa Receptor (µg/m3) (%) Crossnes (µg/m3) (%) (µg/m3) nce ID s (µg/m3) R1 6.23 x 10-7 0.25% 2.12 x 10-6 2.08 x 10-4 83.18% Negligible R2 6.44 x 10-7 0.26% 2.06 x 10-6 2.08 x 10-4 83.16% Negligible R3 6.70 x 10-7 0.27% 2.40 x 10-6 2.08 x 10-4 83.30% Negligible R4 2.37 x 10-7 0.09% 8.18 x 10-7 2.07 x 10-4 82.66% Negligible R5 7.54 x 10-7 0.30% 2.67 x 10-6 2.09 x 10-4 83.40% Negligible R6 6.13 x 10-7 0.25% 1.99 x 10-6 2.08 x 10-4 83.13% Negligible R7 1.09 x 10-6 0.43% 3.35 x 10-6 2.09 x 10-4 83.67% Negligible R8 1.42 x 10-6 0.57% 4.27 x 10-6 2.10 x 10-4 84.04% Negligible R8 B 1.40 x 10-6 0.56% 4.51 x 10-6 2.10 x 10-4 84.14% Negligible R9 2.24 x 10-7 0.09% 6.84 x 10-7 2.07E-04 82.61% Negligible R1 0 2.04 x 10-7 0.08% 6.32 x 10-7 2.06 x 10-4 82.59% Negligible R11 8.10 x 10-7 0.32% 2.67 x 10-6 2.09 x 10-4 83.40% Negligible R12 2.41 x 10-7 0.10% 7.28 x 10-7 2.07 x 10-4 82.62% Negligible R13 2.74 x 10-7 0.11% 9.44 x 10-7 2.07 x 10-4 82.71% Negligible R14 2.30 x 10-7 0.09% 7.51 x 10-7 2.07 x 10-4 82.63% Negligible R15 7.25 x 10-7 0.29% 2.38 x 10-6 2.08 x 10-4 83.28% Negligible 2.1 x 10-4 R16 6.24 x 10-7 0.25% 2.16 x 10-6 2.08E-04 83.20% Negligible -7 -6 -4 R16B 5.73 x 10 0.23% 1.99 x 10 2.08 x 10 83.13% Negligible -7 -6 -4 R17 7.04 x 10 0.28% 2.39 x 10 2.08 x 10 83.29% Negligible -6 -6 -4 R18A 1st 1.15 x 10 0.46% 3.55 x 10 2.09 x 10 83.75% Negligible -6 -6 -4 R18B 4th 1.16 x 10 0.46% 3.55 x 10 2.09 x 10 83.75% Negligible -7 -6 -4 R19A 1st 9.45 x 10 0.38% 2.54 x 10 2.08 x 10 83.35% Negligible -7 -6 -4 R19B 6th 9.61 x 10 0.38% 2.60 x 10 2.08 x 10 83.37% Negligible -6 -6 -4 R20A GF 1.13 x 10 0.45% 3.50 x 10 2.09 x 10 83.73% Negligible -6 -6 -4 R20B 5th 1.14 x 10 0.45% 3.50 x 10 2.09 x 10 83.73% Negligible -7 -7 -4 R21 2.06 x 10 0.08% 6.38 x 10 2.06 x 10 82.59% Negligible -6 -6 -4 R22 1.02 x 10 0.41% 3.16 x 10 2.09 x 10 83.60% Negligible -7 -6 -4 R23 3.21 x 10 0.13% 1.02 x 10 2.07 x 10 82.74% Negligible -7 -7 -4 R24 2.00 x 10 0.08% 6.35 x 10 2.06 x 10 82.59% Negligible -7 -7 -4 R25 1.97 x 10 0.08% 6.25 x 10 2.06 x 10 82.58% Negligible -7 -6 -4 R26 4.56 x 10 0.18% 1.65 x 10 2.07 x 10 83.00% Negligible -4 R27 1.12 x 10-7 0.04% 3.66 x 10-7 2.06 x 10 82.48% Negligible Office Address: 10 Queen Square, Bristol, BS1 4NT T: +44 (0)117 332 7840 E: [email protected] Table C.2.2.4 Predicted Annual Average Cadmium Concentrations Sensitive REP + Background Human REP PC PC RRRF + Total PEC PEC IAQM (2016) Receptor (µg/m3) (%) Crossness (µg/m3) (%) Significance (µg/m3) ID (µg/m3 ) R1 5.93 x 10-5 1.19% 1.58E-04 4.04 x 10-4 8.08% Negligible R2 6.14 x 10-5 1.23% 1.20E-04 3.66 x 10-4 7.31% Negligible R3 6.38 x 10-5 1.28% 1.97E-04 4.43 x 10-4 8.85% Negligible R4 2.25 x 10-5 0.45% 1.05E-04 3.51 x 10-4 7.01% Negligible R5 7.18 x 10-5 1.44% 1.71E-04 4.17 x 10-4 8.34% Negligible R6 5.84 x 10-5 1.17% 2.56E-04 5.02 x 10-4 10.04% Negligible R7 1.03 x 10-4 2.07% 3.57E-04 6.02 x 10-4 12.05% Negligible R8 1.36 x 10-4 2.71% 3.46E-04 5.92 x 10-4 11.84% Negligible R8B 1.33 x 10-4 2.66% 3.57E-04 6.03 x 10-4 12.05% Negligible R9 2.13 x 10-5 0.43% 5.45E-05 3.00 x 10-4 6.01% Negligible R10 1.94 x 10-5 0.39% 4.89E-05 2.95 x 10-4 5.90% Negligible R11 7.72 x 10-5 1.54% 2.02E-04 4.47 x 10-4 8.95% Negligible R12 2.30 x 10-5 0.46% 5.82E-05 3.04 x 10-4 6.08% Negligible R13 2.61 x 10-5 0.52% 6.99E-05 3.16 x 10-4 6.32% Negligible R14 2.19
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Area Appraisal October 2020
    London Borough of Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Areas Appraisal October 2020 DOCUMENT CONTROL Author(s): Maria Medlycott, Teresa O’Connor, Katie Lee-Smith Derivation: Origination Date: 15/10/2020 Reviser(s): Tim Murphy Date of last revision: 23/11/2020 Date Printed: 23/11/2020 Version: 2 Status: Final 2 Contents 1 Acknowledgments and Copyright ................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 3 Explanation of Archaeological Priority Areas .................................................................. 8 4 Archaeological Priority Area Tiers ................................................................................ 10 5 History of Waltham Forest Borough ............................................................................. 13 6 Archaeological Priority Areas in Waltham Forest.......................................................... 31 6.1 Tier 1 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.2 Tier 2 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.3 Tier 3 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 32 6.4 Waltham Forest APA 1.1. Queen Elizabeth Hunting Lodge GV II* .................... 37 6.5 Waltham Forest APA 1.2: Water House ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Two Brewers Epping Forest
    Uif!Uxp!Csfxfst!jt!b!mpwfmz!tqbdjpvt!qvc! xjui!dpngpsubcmf!gvsnjuvsf!bne!b!xfmm. Uif!Uxp!Csfxfst!bne! tupdlfe!cbs/ Ibjnbvmu!Gpsftu-!Fqqjnh! A 3 mile circular pub walk from the Two Brewers in Chigwell Row, Essex. The walking route explores the adjacent Hainault Forest Country Park, with chance to see beautiful ancient Gpsftu-!Fttfy woodland, a pretty lake and even a city farm and zoo. Hfuujnh!uifsf Moderate Terrain Chigwell Row is situated in the triangle formed by the M11, M25 and A12, just a few miles north of Romford on the A1112. The walk starts and finishes at the Two Brewers pub on Lambourne Road, east of the main A1112. The pub has its own car park alongside. Alternatively, if this car park is very busy, turn left out of the pub and there is another car park for 4!njmft! the country park just a little further along on the right. Djsdvmbs!!!!! Approximate post code IG7 6ET. 2!up!2/6! Wbml!Tfdujpnt ipvst Tubsu!up!Dbnfmpu! Go 1 Dspttspbet 200114 Leave the pub car park and turn left along the pavement. Cross over Coopers Close and soon afterwards cross over the main road using the zebra crossing. Veer left into the small country park car park. A few paces in, turn left through the metal kissing gate and keep straight ahead on the grass path running close to the hedgeline on the left. Access Notes Cross the small wooden footbridge into the next field, and then cross this field diagonally right (at 2 o’clock) to reach the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • FCFCG London Map 08.Indd
    1 5 9 13 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 47 Eden at St Pauls Community Surrey Docks Garden, Lambeth Farm, Southwark Walworth Garden Farm, Southwark Calthorpe Project A quiet green space benefi ting the whole King Henry’s Walk Mill Lane Gardening Roots and Shoots Wildlife A thriving 2.2 acre city farm, with projects for Community Garden, neighbourhood. Aims to create a sustainable Garden, Islington Project, Camden adults with learning diffi culties, schools and An environmental/horticultural training centre habitat for wildlife and to promote recycling Hackney City Farm, Hackney Garden, Lambeth young farmers. Meet our cows, donkeys, pigs, featuring a wildlife area and fruit, vegetable Camden and bio-diversity. Includes community An organic community garden with growing A horticultural training project for adults with sheep, chicken, geese, ducks and turkeys. Or and fl ower beds. Also polytunnels, a large Meet the animals in our cobbled farmyard, The garden has a summer meadow, two Bankside Open Spaces compost facilities, a children’s gardening club Heathrow Special Needs plots, beautiful planting, a wildlife pond and learning disabilities. We are open as a garden relax in the herb garden by the River Thames. greenhouse and bees. We run horticultural Community & Environment then relax in the beautiful organic garden. Our ponds, decorative beds, children’s shelter, A 1.2 acre garden described as an oasis by and volunteer days. woodland nature reserve. Run by volunteers, centre, selling potted bedding plants, shrubs training for the unemployed, an environmental Trust, Southwark award-winning café opens daily except Monday. Phoenix Garden, Camden dragon’s den and paradise corner.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2016, London
    London Register 2016 HERITAGE AT RISK 2016 / LONDON Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Greater London 1 Barking and Dagenham 1 Barnet 2 Bexley 5 Brent 5 Bromley 6 Camden 11 City of London 20 Croydon 21 Ealing 24 Enfield 27 Greenwich 30 Hackney 34 Hammersmith and Fulham 40 Haringey 43 Harrow 47 Havering 50 Hillingdon 51 Hounslow 58 Islington 64 Kensington and Chelsea 70 Kingston upon Thames 81 Lambeth 82 Lewisham 91 London Legacy (MDC) 95 Merton 96 Newham 101 Redbridge 103 Richmond upon Thames 104 Southwark 108 Sutton 116 Tower Hamlets 117 Waltham Forest 123 Wandsworth 126 Westminster, City of 129 II London Summary 2016 he Heritage at Risk Register in London reflects the diversity of our capital’s historic environment. It includes 682 buildings and sites known to be at risk from Tneglect, decay or inappropriate development - everything from an early 18th century church designed by Nicholas Hawksmoor, to a boathouse built during WWI on an island in the Thames. These are sites that need imagination and investment. In London the scale of this challenge has grown. There are 12 more assets on the Heritage at Risk Register this year compared to 2015. We also know that it’s becoming more expensive to repair many of our buildings at risk. In the face of these challenges we’re grateful for the help and support of all those who continue to champion our historic environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Parks for London 2017
    ''The measure of any great civilisation is in its cities, and the measure of a city's greatness is to be found in the quality of its public spaces, it's parks and squares.'' John Ruskin Sponsored by Part of Capita plc Contents Foreword..........................................................3 Part 2 Introduction.....................................................4 Signature Parks and green spaces City of London - Open space beyond the square mile...38 Overall scores...................................................8 Lee Valley Regional Park Authority............................40 Thamesmead - London’s largest housing landscape......42 Part 1 The Royal Parks......................................................43 Good Parks for London Criteria Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park..................................45 1. Public Satisfaction...........................................10 Landscape contractors 2. Awards for quality...........................................12 idverde - A whole system approach............................47 3. Collaboration with other Boroughs..................14 Glendale - Partnership in practice.............................49 4. Events.............................................................16 5. Health, fitness and well-being.........................20 Capel Manor - London’s land based college.........50 6. Supporting nature...........................................24 7. Community involvement.................................28 8. Skills development..........................................30 Valuing our parks
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor's Biodiversity Strategy
    Connecting with London’s nature The Mayor’s Biodiversity Strategy July 2002 copyright Greater London Authority July 2002 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 1 85261 385 8 Cover photograph credit PA Photos This publication is printed on Evolution Satin The Mayor’s Biodiversity Strategy Mayor of London iii contents foreword vi 1 introduction 1 2 London’s biodiversity: the context 7 London’s wildlife habitats 7 Woodland 8 Grassland 9 The River Thames and its tributaries 10 The canals 11 Ponds and lakes 11 Heathland 12 Farmland 12 Parks and squares 13 Cemeteries and churchyards 13 Gardens and allotments 14 Community gardens, city farms and ecology centres 14 Railway land, linesides and roadsides 14 Wasteland 15 The built environment 15 Protected sites 16 London’s rare species 19 The existing programme of work for biodiversity 20 The Mayor’s vision for London 22 Objectives for biodiversity 23 References 24 3 linkages with other strategies and crosscutting themes 27 Health 27 Sustainable development 28 Equality of opportunities 29 Access to natural green space 30 Threats to perceived safety and physical barriers to access 31 Paid and voluntary employment 31 Consultation 31 Black and ethnic minority people 31 Faith groups 32 Disabled people 32 Older people 32 Young people and children 32 State of the environment 32 The London Plan 33 Transport 33 iv Mayor of London The Mayor’s Biodiversity Strategy Economic development 34 Waste management
    [Show full text]
  • Green Arc: Summary
    Green Arc: Summary What is the Green Arc? The strap line for the project is `bringing the great outdoors closer to people’. In general terms it is about making the countryside more accessible and improving its quality. In this instance quality is defined as its usability and interest for people, but also its viability as farmland and for traditional management, including grasslands, hedgerows and woodland; and for wildlife. What is the project designed to achieve? To a great extent within the broad aim exactly what is done can be influenced by local communities. One immediate effect is to add another reason for safeguarding the Green Belt in that it gives the Green Belt a positive function in addition to the stated purpose of openness. Other direct improvements may include improvements to footpaths and footpath signage, improvements in land management and projects designed to improve the understanding of the countryside. How will these objectives be achieved? A project team has been established, led by Mary Parodi, Project Director, currently hosted by Essex County Council. There is a steering group comprising national bodies, principally natural England (the Countryside Agency as was), the Forestry Commission etc, the Corporation of London, the Mayor of London’s Office, the Woodland Trust and Thames Chase Community Forest. Essex County Council is a steering group member. Epping Forest District Council is also a steering group member; Epping Forest District Council is the only District Council or local body represented. The principal role of Epping Forest District Council on the steering group has been to contribute local knowledge and expertise, and to try to ensure that the project takes proper account of local feelings and concerns, and will properly engage the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Epping Forest
    Cultural Learning Resources OUR ENVIRONMENT E P P I N G SHEETS FACT F O R E S T Print-friendly PDF E P P I N G F O R E S T Epping Forest is a 5,900-acre area of ancient woodland between Epping in Essex to the north, and Forest Gate to the south. It is the largest public open SHEETS FACT space in the London area. It is a former royal forest, and is managed by the City of London Corporation. CONTENTS EPPING FOREST MAP 03 A BRIEF HISTORY OF EPPING FOREST 04 WILLIAM MORRIS AND EPPING FOREST 08 CHINGFORD PLAIN 09 OUR ENVIRONMENT: EPPING FOREST 02 E P P I N G F O R E S T Copped Hall Park Warlies Waltham Park Abbey Epping Gi ord Wood The Warren Plantation Epping Thicks Ambresbury Banks Theydon Bois Jacks Big View Hill Theydon Bois Deer SHEETS FACT Sanctuary Theydon Wake Green Valley Furze Pond Ground Great Monk Wood Debden Green Epping Forest Visitor Centre Little Monk Wood Baldwins Hill High Truelove’s Loughton Beach Camp Robin Hood Roundabout Femhills Staples Hill Loughton Bury The Debden Wood Stubbles Yardley Sewardstonebury Hill The Warren Loughton Connaught Warren Water Hill Chingford Golf Course Pole Queen Elizabeth Hill Hunting Lodge North Farm Chingford Whitehall Plain Chigwell Buckhurst Hill Chingford Lord’s Bushes Knighton Wood Chigwell Roding Valley Woodford Green Highams Park Woodford E P P I N G F O R E S T A Brief History of Epping Forest Early History There has been continuous tree cover in Epping Forest for well over 3,000 years, and signs of human occupation since the Iron Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Hainault Ancient Forest Consultation Boards
    Vision Redbridge is developing a Masterplan for Hainault Forest To help us develop the masterplan, we need to gather as much information as we can on how people use the park, what they value and how it might be improved. We really value your input. Use stickers to tell us what you would like to see in Hainault Forest: • Yes. I like this • Maybe. I like aspects of this • No. I don’t like this this event HAINAULT ANCIENT FOREST Historical Timeline Historical Maps and Images Gradual and parƟ al clearing of the wooded forested landscape, for the Pre-history culƟ vaƟ on of food and farming of animals SeƩ lements and rural villas develops Roman Development of more substanƟ al rural seƩ lements focused on agricultural Anglo-Saxon producƟ on. FoundaƟ on of Barking Abbey CreaƟ on of the ‘Forest of Essex’ and likely date at which the site fell under 1130’s ‘Forest Law’ First recorded use of the name ‘Henehout’. 1221 Progressive clearance of land to the south of the site for agriculture ‘PerambulaƟ ons‘ of the Forest of Essex under Henry III and then Edward I Medieval interpretaƟ ve plan of the survey area The 1777 Chapman and Andre map gives an idea as to the later medieval and early post-medieval landscape Pennington’s map of The Kings Woods, drawn 1791 (redrawn 1849 for the Enclosure Act) 1880 1st edn. OS 25” map 1224- 1300 around the Site (the approximate extent of the Site is shown in red) The Mediaeval Landscape The Mediaeval reduces it to 60,000 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Site Assessments
    PROTECTING THE GEODIVERSITY OF THE CAPITAL 1 SITE ASSESSMENTS The following types of site are Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) 7 Regionally Important Geological Site (RIGS) 30 Locally Important Geological Site (LIGS) 34 CONTENTS Number Name Borough Page GLA1 Abbey Wood Bexley 3 GLA 2 Stephens House (formerly known as Avenue House), Finchley Barnet 7 GLA 3 Beckenham Place Park Lewisham 9 GLA 4 Chelsfield Gravel Bromley 11 GLA 5 Chingford Hatch Waltham Forest 14 GLA 6 Croham Hurst Croydon 16 GLA 7 Crystal Palace Geological Illustrations Bromley 19 GLA 8 Dog Rocks Greenwich 22 GLA 9 Carshalton Urban Dry Valley Sutton 24 GLA 12 Finsbury Gravel Islington 26 GLA 14 Gilbert's Pit Greenwich 28 GLA 15 Hainault Forest Country Park Redbridge 32 GLA 17 Happy Valley Croydon 35 GLA 18 Harrow Weald Harrow 37 GLA 19 Hornchurch Cutting Havering 40 GLA 20 Horsenden Hill Ealing 43 GLA 22 Keston Common Bromley 46 GLA 24 Old Gravel Pit, Blackheath (Eliot Pits) Lewisham 49 GLA 25 Putney Heath Wandsworth 52 GLA 26 Riddlesdown Quarry (formerly Rose and Crown Pit) Croydon 54 GLA 29 The Gravel Pits, Northwood Hillingdon 57 GLA 30 Cray Valley Golf Course Sand Pit Bromley 59 GLA 31 North End Pit (Erith Park) Bexley 62 GLA 32 High Elms Dene Hole Bromley 65 GLA 33 Elmstead Pit Bromley 67 GLA 34 Harefield Pit Hillingdon 69 GLA 35 Wansunt Pit (in Braeburn Park) Bexley 72 GLA 36 Pinner Chalk Mines Harrow 75 GLA 37 Marks Warren Farm Quarry Complex Barking & Dagenham 78 GLA 38 Chalky Dell, Lesnes Abbey Woods Bexley 81 GLA 39 Erith Submerged Forest and Saltings
    [Show full text]
  • Post Consultation Draft East London Green Grid Framework
    Post Consultation Draft East London Green Grid Framework The London Plan (Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London) Draft Supplementary Planning Guidance August 2007 Post Consultation Draft East London Green Grid Framework The London Plan (Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London) Draft Supplementary Planning Guidance August 2007 copyright Greater London Authority August 2007 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries: 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978 1 84781 062 5 Cover photograph: Adam Hinton This publication is printed on recycled paper Copies of this draft Supplementary Planning Guidance are available form www.london.gov.uk . The Post Consultation Draft The Mayor’s draft supplementary planning guidance (SPG) the East London Green Grid Framework was published for consultation between November 2006 and February 2007. As a result of the comments received during the consultation period it is proposed to amend the document. As this SPG is linked to the Further Alterations to the London Plan (FALP) it is not possible to publish the final version of the SPG until the statutory process for these alterations has been completed. That process is scheduled to end with the publication of the revised London Plan early in 2008. In the interim period this Post Consultation version of the SPG illustrates the changes that have been made as a result of the comments received. This does not constitute a formal stage in the preparation of the SPG, nor does it provide for a further round of consultation. The status and weight attached to this document as a material consideration within the planning process will be greater as it has gone through a consultation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee for London Minutes of the September Meeting
    Summary report of the meeting of the Committee for London held on 14 September at 10:00 a.m. at Rainham Hall, National Trust, The Broadway, Rainham, RM13 9YN Members: • Blondel Cluff (Chair) • Hilary Carty • Jenny Cousins • Sandie Dawe • Rachel Hasted • Jonathan Sheaff • Jennifer Ullman Committee Business 1. Chair’s Report Oral The Chair • welcomed everyone to Rainham Hall • noted that committee recruitment was underway and requested that members promote the vacancies through their networks. A drop-in session would be held on Friday 23 September at HLF offices for interested individuals • reported on recent Board decisions for successful London projects; these included the parks for people applications for Beddington Park, Marble Hill and Headstone Manor Recreation Park. St Marylebone: Changing Lives, Endeavour Galleries Project at the National Maritime Museum, Paddington’s Living Heritage at St Mary Magdalene’s and Acquisition of the Armada Portrait of Elizabeth I had all received awards • reported that a meeting with Mark Field, MP for Westminster had taken place and the Board decisions and wider funding for projects in London had been noted. • commented on successful project visits attended with Ros Kerslake, Chief Executive and Stuart Hobley, including Handel and Hendrix museum, Orleans House and Kew Gardens. • announced that she had been appointed for an additional 3 year term. 2. Minutes from the meeting on 15 June 2016 CL 2016 (3) 2 The minutes were approved and signed as a true and correct record. 3. Matters arising from the minutes Oral Stuart Hobley reported: • on feedback given to applicants following the June committee meeting decisions • Officers were exploring the internal policy on funding training placements (item 3, page 2) • on advocacy and stakeholder engagement activity and particularly with the new Mayor for London, Sadiq Khan (item 4, page 2); Justine Simmons OBE had been appointed the Deputy Mayor for Culture and Education; Justine was familiar with HLF.
    [Show full text]