Objectification, Dehumanisation, and Othering Course Guide 2019-20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Objectification, Dehumanisation, and Othering Course Guide 2019-20 Objectification, Dehumanisation, and Othering Course Guide 2019-20 Course Organiser and Lecturer: Dr. Aidan McGlynn ([email protected], DSB 6.12, he/him, office hour Thursday 11-12 or by appointment) Course Secretary: Ann-Marie Cowe ([email protected], Undergraduate Teaching Office DSB G.06) 1. Course Description This course looks at three ways that certain behaviours, attitudes, institutions, representations, and ways of using language have been morally criticised. To objectify is to treat or represent a person as a mere thing; to dehumanise is to treat or represent a person as lacking in humanity, for example, as animal-, insect-, or disease-like; while to treat someone as the Other is to enjoy and depend on their recognition of oneself as a subject, while failing to fully reciprocate this recognition. However, these slogans leave the crucial questions largely unanswered. It’s left unclear what it is to treat people in these ways, in what ways such treatment might be morally problematic, and to what extent these three notions overlap (and whether we’re really dealing with three distinct notions here at all). Moreover, philosophers such as Kate Manne and Mari Mikkola have recently denied the significance of objectification and dehumanisation, as typically understood, while Nancy Bauer has questioned whether philosophers can say anything true and significant about them. This course introduces leading philosophical accounts of objectification, dehumanisation, and othering, and investigates the degree of overlap between the three notions. We will also examine scepticism about the significance of these notions, looking closely at a number of case-studies in order to assess the plausibility of this kind of scepticism. These case-studies will include sexist pornography, epistemic injustice (Miranda Fricker’s term for ways in which one can be harmed in one’s capacity as an epistemic subject), and the roles of dehumanising language and imagery. 2. Intended Learning Outcomes This course will allow students to demonstrate core skills in philosophy, including interpreting and critically engaging with philosophical texts, evaluating arguments and theories, and developing one’s own ideas in response to the issues discussed. Students will be able to understand, explain, and critically evaluate the principal theories of objectification, dehumanisation, and othering, as well as the most pressing issues facing such theories, and will be able to write short, clear papers on the topics covered in the class, manifesting the core philosophical skills listed above. 1 3. Course Content 1. Can Philosophers Teach Us Anything About Objectification? Primary Readings Nancy Bauer, 2015, ‘What Philosophy Can’t Teach Us About Sexual Objectification’, in Nancy Bauer, How To Do Things With Pornography, Harvard University Press: 21- 37. Available online through University library. Simone de Beauvoir, 1949, The Second Sex, Vintage Books, Introduction to Volume 1. (Borde and Malovany-Chevallier translation preferred, but Parshley will be fine and is more widely available.) 2. Objectification as a Cluster Concept Background Barbara Herman, 1993, ‘Could It Be Worth Thinking About Kant on Sex and Marriage?’, in Louise Anthony and Charlotte Witt, eds, A Mind of One’s Own, Westview Press/Routledge: 49-67. Primary Readings Martha Nussbaum, 1995, ‘Objectification’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 24: 249-91. Available online through University library. Further Readings Langton, Rae, 2005, ‘Autonomy-Denial in Objectification’, reprinted in Rae Langton, Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 223-40. Available online through University library. Rae Langton, 1995, ‘Sexual Solipsism.’, reprinted in Rae Langton, Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 311-55. Available online through University library. Lina Papadaki, 2010, ‘What is Objectification?’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 7: 16-36. Available online through University library. 2 3. Objectification as Imposition Background Catharine MacKinnon, 1987, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, Harvard University Press. Primary Reading Sally Haslanger, 1993, ‘On Being Objective and Being Objectified’, in Sally Haslanger, Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique: 35-82. Available online through University library. Further Readings Timo Jütten, 2016, ‘Sexual Objectification’, Ethics 127: 27-49. Available online through University library. Rae Langton, 2000, ‘Feminism in Epistemology: Exclusion and Objectification’, reprinted in Rae Langton, Sexual Solipsism, Oxford University Press, 267-88, section 3. Available online through the university library. Patricia Hill Collins, 2000, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (Second Edition), Routledge, chapters 4 and 5. Available online through University library. 4. Othering as Derivatisation Primary Reading Ann Cahill, 2011, Overcoming Objectification: A Carnal Ethics, Routledge: chapters 1 and 2. Further Reading See week 9. 5. Dehumanisation Primary Reading David Livingstone Smith, 2016, ‘Paradoxes of Dehumanization’, Social Theory and Practice 42 (2): 416-43. Available online through University library. Further Reading 3 David Livingstone Smith, 2011, Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others, St. Martin’s Press. 6. Human, All Too Human Background Reading Kate Manne, 2014, ‘In Ferguson and Beyond, Punishing Humanity’, The New York Times: https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/in-ferguson-and-beyond- punishing-humanity/ Primary Reading Kate Manne, 2018, Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny, Oxford University Press: chapter 6. Available online through University library (or as audiobook from other places). Advanced Reading Mari Mikkola, 2016, The Wrong of Injustice: Dehumanization and its Role in Feminist Philosophy, Oxford University Press: chapter 6. Available online through University library. 7. Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Objectification Background Aidan McGlynn, draft, ‘Epistemic Injustice’. Available on Learn. Main Readings Miranda Fricker, 2007, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford University Press, chapter 6. Available online through University library. Aidan McGlynn, forthcoming, ‘Epistemic Objectification as the Primary Harm of Testimonial Injustice’, Episteme. Available online through University library. Further Reading Aidan McGlynn, 2019, ‘Testimonial Injustice, Pornography, and Silencing’, Analytic Philosophy 60: 405-17. Available online through University library. 4 8. Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Othering Background Week 4 readings Axel Honneth, 1995, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Polity Press: chapter 6. Primary Readings Gaile Pohlhaus Jr., 2014, ‘Discerning the Primary Epistemic Harm in Cases of Testimonial Injustice’, Social Epistemology 28 (2): 99-114. Available online through University library. Emmalon Davis, 2016, ‘Typecasts, Tokens, and Spokespersons: A Case for Credibility Excess as Testimonial Injustice’, Hypatia 31: 485-501. Available online through University library. Further Readings Aidan McGlynn, draft, ‘Objects or Others? Epistemic Agency and the Primary Harm of Testimonial Injustice’. Available on Learn. Paul Giladi, 2017, ‘Epistemic Injustice: A Role for Recognition?’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 44 (2): 141-58. Available online through University library. Matthew Congdon, 2017, ‘What’s Wrong with Epistemic Injustice? Harm, Vice, Objectification, Misrecognition’, in Ian James Kidd, José Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus Jr. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, Routledge: 243-53. Available online through University library. Miranda Fricker, 2018, ‘Epistemic Injustice and Recognition Theory: A New Conversation Afterword’, Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4 (4): 1-5. Available online. José Medina, 2018, ‘Misrecognition and Epistemic Injustice’, Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4 (4): 1-16. Available online. 9. Objectifying Representations Background Lorna Finlayson, 2016, An Introduction to Feminism, Cambridge University Press: chapter 9. Available at the university library. Primary Readings 5 Aidan McGlynn, draft, ‘Epistemic Objectification in Pornography’. Available on Learn. A. W. Eaton, 2012, ‘What’s Wrong With the (Female) Nude? A Feminist Perspective on Art and Pornography’, in Hans Maes and Jerrold Levinson, eds. Art and Pornography: Philosophical Essays, Oxford University Press: 229-53. Available online through University library. 10. Dehumanising Language Background Mark Greenberg and Gilbert Harman, 2008, ‘Conceptual Role Semantics’, in Ernest Lepore and Barry Smith, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, Oxford University Press: 295-322. Primary Readings Lynne Tirrell, 2012, ‘Genocidal Language Games’, in Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, Oxford University Press: 174-221. Eleonore Neufeld, forthcoming, ‘Pornography and Dehumanization: The Essentialist Dimension’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy. Available online. Further Reading David Livingstone Smith, 2011, Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others, St. Martin’s Press. 11. Revision 6 .
Recommended publications
  • Participatory Action Research on Gender-Based Hate Speech Online with a Karnataka-Based Youth Group
    Acknowledgments Research team Bhavna Jha, Soujanya Sridharan, Aparna Kalley, Anusha Hegde, Karthik K, Shreyas Hiremath Research report Bhavna Jha, Soujanya Sridharan, Ankita Aggarwal, Tanvi Kanchan, Sneha Bhagwat, Aparna Kalley Session facilitators Soujanya Sridharan, Aparna Kalley, Karthik K, Anusha Hegde, Shreyas Hiremath, Kirana Kumari This report is part of IT for Change’s project, Recognize, Resist, Remedy: Addressing Gender-Based Hate Speech in the Online Public Sphere, supported by International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Canada. This Participatory Action Research project was co-facilitated by IT for Change and Samvada Baduku. To cite this report: IT for Change (2021). Participatory Action Research on Gender-Based Hate Speech Online with a Karnataka-Based Youth Group. Recognize, Resist, Remedy: Addressing Gender-Based Hate Speech in the Online Public Sphere. https://itforchange.net/sites/default/files/1738/PAR-on-gender-based-hate- speech-online-with-a-Karnataka-based-youth-group.pdf 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgments..............................................................................................................................................2 Executive summary.............................................................................................................................................5 1. Rationale and context...................................................................................................................................6 2. Objectives and research questions..............................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • An Extension of Objectification Theory: Examining the Roles of Racial and Cultural Factors On
    An Extension of Objectification Theory: Examining the Roles of Racial and Cultural Factors on Self-Objectification and Depression Among Asian American Women Suah Kim Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 ! 2014 Suah Kim All rights reserved ABSTRACT An Extension of Objectification Theory: Examining the Roles of Racial and Cultural Factors on Self-Objectification and Depression Among Asian American Women Suah Kim Objectification theory proposed the idea that U.S. culture positions women to be viewed as physical entities foremost, typically to the fulfillment of men’s sexual desires. The most damaging aspect of this experience is women’s internalization of this perspective into their own sense of self, which has been shown to predict body image issues, eating disturbances, depression, sexual dysfunction, reduced psychological flow, and substance abuse. More recently, there have been efforts to examine how multiple layers of oppression may impact the experiences of sexual objectification and its psychological consequences. This study tested an extension of objectification theory on a sample of 618 Asian American women with the inclusion of race-related experiences, Asian American cultural values, and their relationships with the self- objectification process and depression. Findings indicate that the more participants endorsed Asian American cultural values, the more they engaged in a self-objectification process that involved internalizing mainstream ideals of beauty, monitoring their body appearance, and feeling shame and less satisfaction with race-related features and their bodies in general, which then predicted depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Gucci: Flattening Women Through Patriarchal Heteronormativity
    Running head: GUCCI: FLATTENING WOMEN 1 Gucci: Flattening Women Through Patriarchal Heteronormativity Sara R. Freitag Approaches to Rhetorical Criticism Dr. Antonio T. De La Garza Fall 2017 GUCCI: FLATTENING WOMEN 2 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to employ feminist ideological framework and Creative Analytic Practice in evaluating the inferior positionality that women are subjected to through Gucci’s 2003 and 2010 advertising campaigns. My paper enters intellectual discourse surrounding fashion photography and contributes toward the discussion by explicating ways women are flattened physically, visually, and metaphorically. Previous analyses have touched on these topics, but there has been lack of precision and gravity in regard to implications. Furthermore, no research has been presented in regard to Gucci’s perpetuation of such ideals. Hegemonic masculinity’s prevalence is evident, as it pervades every aspect of culture. Though women’s fashion photography targets a primarily female audience, patriarchal heteronormativity implicitly and explicitly undermines women’s autonomy. The “male gaze,” which is evident in all forms of media, is particularly pervasive in women’s fashion photography. Conclusions convey that Gucci’s portrayal of women gives way to the illusion that the female half of the population is of little worth, to be subordinated by the dominant male population. The message being sent is that women, through physical, visual, and metaphorical means, are solely an image. GUCCI: FLATTENING WOMEN 3 Gucci: Flattening Women Through Patriarchal Heteronormativity Women have been flattened. They have been flattened physically, visually, and metaphorically at the command of oppression’s chief watchdog, otherwise known as fashion photography. Fashion photography presented by such brands as the prestigious and equally idolized Gucci strip women of freedom, identity, and voice.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Representations of Commercial Sex Work on Transvestite and Transsexual Females in Brazil
    Actualidades en Psicología, 32(125), 2018, 79-93 ISSN 2215-3535 http://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/actualidades DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v32i125.30528 Battlefield: Social Representations of Commercial Sex Work on Transvestite and Transsexual Females in Brazil Sobre campos de batallas: Representaciones sociales del comercio sexual entre mujeres auto-identificadas como transexuales y travestis brasileñas Jaime Alonso Caravaca Morera1 Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica Abstract. Objective. To analyze commercial sex work’s social representations among Brazilian women who identify as transvestite or transsexual. Methods: A qualitative study with a descriptive and analytical approach based on the Theoretical Paradigm of Social Representation with a structural approach. The sample group was formed by 100 women who defined themselves as transvestite and transsexual in Santa Catarina, Brazil. The data was gathered from September to December 2016 via a questionnaire using the technique of free association of words, as well as semi-directed interviews. Results: Through both prototypical and content analysis, it was confirmed that the most likely elements that formed the core of the social representation were: violence, drugs, risk, work, sadness, prejudice, and danger. In the objectification/objectivation process of commercial sex work, the image shows a mix between daily activities in the streets – which they consider to be their battlefield – and their own feelings and experiences of vulnerability in other areas of society, starting with families, churches, schools and the like. Conclusions: By experiencing commercial sex work, female transvestite and transsexual individuals reveal how the elements that form the social representation are of paramount importance in the legitimation, legalization, and simplification of their identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteronormativity, Critical Race Theory and Anti-Racist Politics
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository UF Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship Winter 1999 Ignoring the Sexualization of Race: Heteronormativity, Critical Race Theory and Anti-Racist Politics Darren Lenard Hutchinson University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Writing and Research Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Darren Lenard Hutchinson, Ignoring the Sexualization of Race: Heteronormativity, Critical Race Theory and Anti-Racist Politics, 47 Buff. L. Rev. 1 (1999), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/417 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UF Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BUFFALO LAW REVIEW VOLUME 47 WINTER 1999 NUMBERI Ignoring the Sexualization of Race: Heteronormativity, Critical Race Theory and Anti-Racist Politics DARREN LENARD HUTCHINSONt INTRODUCTION A fiery dissent rages within the body of identity politics and civil rights theory. The participants in this discourse have lodged fundamental (as well as controversial) charges. Most frequently, these critics argue that the enormous cadre of political activists, progressive lawyers and legal theorists engaged in the particulars of challenging social inequality lack even a basic understanding of how the var- ious forms of subordination operate in society because they fail (or refuse) to realize that systems of oppression do not stand in isolation.! Furthermore, these critics have argued tAssistant Professor, Southern Methodist University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Full Range of the Objectification of Women
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship@Western Western University Scholarship@Western Philosophy Publications Philosophy Department 2003 Mere and Partial Means: The ulF l Range of the Objectification of Women Carolyn McLeod The University of Western Ontario, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/philosophypub Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Citation of this paper: McLeod, Carolyn, "Mere and Partial Means: The ulF l Range of the Objectification of Women" (2003). Philosophy Publications. 346. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/philosophypub/346 Mere and Partial Means: The Full Range of the Objectification of Women Carolyn McLeod Kant discussed the moral wrong of treating people as mere means or as a means only.1 To treat people as means is to treat them as objects for our use. It is to objectify them. To treat people as a mere means is to treat them wholly as objects, rather than partially so. It is to have an objectifying manner that is absolute or unmitigated. Whether Kant meant to suggest that we commit a moral wrong only when we treat people as means absolutely, rather than partially, is debatable.2 My concern is with how feminist theorists writing on the objectification of women have followed Kant in emphasizing the extreme case of the mere means. These feminists have implied that the moral wrong of objectification occurs only with absolute objectification, as though between it and respecting someone’s autonomy, there were no degrees of objectification that are morally suspect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reification of Hegemonic Masculinity Via Heteronormativity, Sexual Objectification, and Masculine Erp Formances in Tau Kappa Epsilon Recruitment Videos
    Butler Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 4 2018 The Reification of Hegemonic Masculinity via Heteronormativity, Sexual Objectification, and Masculine erP formances in Tau Kappa Epsilon Recruitment Videos Viki Tomanov Butler University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/bjur Part of the Broadcast and Video Studies Commons, Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Organizational Communication Commons, Social Media Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Tomanov, Viki (2018) "The Reification of Hegemonic Masculinity via Heteronormativity, Sexual Objectification, and Masculine Performances in Tau Kappa Epsilon Recruitment Videos," Butler Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 4 , Article 13. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/bjur/vol4/iss1/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Butler Journal of Undergraduate Research by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BUTLER JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH, VOLUME 4 REIFYING HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY IN TKE RECRUITMENT VIDEOS VIKI TOMANOV, BUTLER UNIVERSITY MENTOR: DACIA CHARLESWORTH Abstract Fraternity members constitute a large percentage of men who hold highly influential jobs in politics, large corporations, and the like. Since fraternities are limited to men-only, it is important to examine how masculinity is both rhetorically constructed and subsequently performed. Tau Kappa Epsilon (TKE), the fraternity with the largest amount of chapters nationwide, is the focus of my analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Speech in Social Media: Perceptions and Attitudes of Higher Education Students in Portugal
    HATE SPEECH IN SOCIAL MEDIA: PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN PORTUGAL S. Santos, I. Amaral, R. Basílio Simões University of Coimbra (PORTUGAL) Abstract Hate speech in social media has been an increasing concern, particularly during the last decade. Today, the rates of technology adoption are very high, particularly among the younger groups. Students are permanently connected through mobile technologies and the explosion of social media led to major changes in the flows of communication. Social platforms became the chosen vehicle for personal communication, for getting the news and for entertainment. At the same time, social media reflects the growing ideological polarization that is particularly visible on politics, religion, environmental and gender and sexuality issues. Hate speech is not a new phenomenon but it has specific characteristics in the online world that pose new challenges. International organizations have been promoting initiatives to support countries in tackling this issue. Social media platforms are also defining rules against diverse forms of intolerance particularly directed at vulnerable groups. Currently, there is a growing body of feminist research that has mainly focused on identifying how social media platforms can be toxic environments for women, namely by facilitating image-based sexual abuses and the sexual objectification of women and girls. Higher education students are a critical group regarding this problem. Not only they are permanently connected, but they are also frequently less prepared to deal with disinformation and discriminatory digital interactions than they think. In this qualitative study, we want to know how higher education students in Portugal deal with online hate speech, particularly gender-focused hate speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability in the Health of Young Transgender Women Living with HIV/AIDS
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Vulnerability in the health of young transgender women living with HIV/AIDS Vulnerabilidade em saúde das jovens transexuais que vivem com HIV/aids Vulnerabilidad en salud de las jóvenes transexuales que viven con VIH/SIDA ABSTRACT Rafaela Greice da SilvaI Objectives: to analyze the health vulnerability of young female transgender living with HIV/ AIDS. Methods: qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory study, based on the theoretical ORCID: 0000-0002-3782-1545 reference of Social Representation and concept of vulnerability; developed with six transgender Paula Daniella de AbreuII women in a reference Hospital for HIV/AIDS. We analyzed the individual interviews, recorded, and transcribed in full, in the IRaMuTeQ software by Similitude Analysis. Results: the thematic ORCID: 0000-0001-8756-8173 categories are listed based on the Ayres reference: 1) Individual dimension of vulnerability Ednaldo Cavalcante de AraújoI to HIV/AIDS; 2) Social dimension of vulnerability to HIV/AIDS; 3) Programmatic dimension ORCID: 0000-0002-1834-4544 of the vulnerability. Final Considerations: the young female transsexual living with HIV/ AIDS experience a context of vulnerability in health associated with a lack of knowledge and Alef Diogo da Silva SantanaI difficulties for the realization of self-care. The study evidenced the representations of social ORCID: 0000-0001-8165-6412 abjection and unpreparedness of the health team that compose the Primary Attention in Health in promoting qualified assistance for the execution of the effective and humanized care. Josueida de Carvalho SousaI Descriptors: Nursing; HIV Infections; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Health Vulner- ORCID: 0000-0001-5547-5298 ability; Transgender Persons. Jorge LyraI RESUMO ORCID: 0000-0002-5381-2059 Objetivos: analisar a vulnerabilidade em saúde das jovens transexuais femininas que Claudia Benedita dos SantosII vivem com HIV/aids.
    [Show full text]
  • Objectification Theory, Self-Objectification, and Body Image
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kent Academic Repository Provided for non-commercial research and educational use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This article was originally published in Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non- commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution's administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution's website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Calogero RM. Objectification Theory, Self-Objectification, and Body Image. In: Thomas F. Cash, editor. Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance, Vol 2. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. pp. 574–580. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy O Objectification Theory, Self-Objectification, and Body Image RM Calogero, Virginia Wesleyan College, Norfolk, VA, USA © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Glossary sexual objectification When a person is reduced to and/or self-objectification A self-perspective that involves taking treated solely as a body or a collection of body parts for a primary view of the self as an object; viewing oneself sexual use; when sexual parts and/or functions are from a third-person perspective as opposed to a separated out from the rest of the person.
    [Show full text]
  • Transphobic Victimisation and Perceptions of Future Risk: a Large-Scale Study of the Experiences of Trans People in the UK
    Transphobic victimisation and perceptions of future risk: A large-scale study of the experiences of trans people in the UK Sonja J Ellis, Louis Bailey and Jay McNeil Abstract Due to perceived non-conformity to conventional constructions of gender, trans people may be subject to overt victimisation (e.g. physical or sexual violence; verbal abuse) and as a result of those experiences (actual or ‘witnessed’) may fear future victimisation. While some existing work reports levels of transphobic victimisation, there is a dearth of research on perceived risk; and more importantly, exploring group differences in actual victimisation and perceived risk. Drawing on survey responses from 660 trans people, the current study sets out to explore levels of victimisation, perceived risk of victimisation, and group differences (gender identity; stage of transition) in both these phenomena. Findings show that congruent with work on systematic oppression and minority stress, perceived risk of victimisation outstrips actual experiences. Almost no group differences were found on a basis of gender identity. Conversely, those currently undergoing a process (or part of a process) of gender reassignment or transition were significantly more likely to report having been victimised, and to perceive themselves at risk of future victimisation than those at any other stage of transition. That levels of perceived risk outstripped actual experiences of victimisation suggests that, in a culture that privileges cisgender experiences, isolated experiences of victimisation invoke a heightened sense of fear in members of the wider trans community. These findings suggest that there is a pressing need for dedicated support services for trans people; especially those who are going through a process of transitioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Aims and a Trans-Inclusive Definition of "Woman"
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 5-2-2018 Feminist Aims and A Trans-Inclusive Definition of "Woman" Katie L. Kirkland Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Recommended Citation Kirkland, Katie L., "Feminist Aims and A Trans-Inclusive Definition of "Woman"." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2018. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/225 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FEMINIST AIMS AND A TRANS-INCLUSIVE DEFINITION OF “WOMAN” by KATIE KIRKLAND Under the Direction of Christie Hartley, PhD ABSTRACT Katharine Jenkins argues that Sally Haslanger’s focal analysis of gender problematically excludes non-passing trans women from the category “woman.” However, Jenkins does not explain why this exclusion contradicts the feminist aims of Haslanger’s account. In this paper, I advance two arguments that suggest that a trans-inclusive account of “woman” is crucial to the aims of feminism. I claim that the aims of feminism are to understand and combat women’s oppression. First, I argue that denial of trans identities reinforces cultural ideas that perpetuate both transphobic violence and sexual violence against women. Consequently, a feminist account of “woman” that fails to respect trans identities indirectly contributes to the oppression of women. Second, I prove that non-passing trans women are oppressed as women through the internalization of sexual objectification.
    [Show full text]