Gastrointestinal Complications of Hepatic Transplantation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gastrointestinal Complications of Hepatic Transplantation Gastrointestinal Complications of Hepatic Transplantation L. J. Koep, T. E. Starzl, and R. Weil III N THE largest series of orthotopic liver was withheld because bleeding was felt to be I transplants, now numbering 150 patients, only one factor in an otherwise terminal the largest number of major complications patient. The remaining 22 patients all have arisen in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. required surgical intervention for enteric Of these, hepatic complications comprise the bleeding. Of these, only 5 ultimately survived majority. and they have been previously this complication. described by both leading centers.12 A Peptic ulcer disease was the most fre­ smaller number of complications have arisen quent etiology of gastrointestinal bleeding elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract, but (Table I). Duodenal ulcers occurred in five because of their alarming mortality. they patients, of which two survived this complica­ have depressed the otherwise improving tion. One survivor responded to vagotomy and picture of hepatic transplantation. gastroenterostomy, while the other required first a vagotomy and pyloroplasty followed by CLINICAL MATERIAL antrectomy. Gastroenterostomy or resection Gastrointestinal complications occurring in alone were not successfuL Two patients devel­ this series of hepatic transplants include oped gastric ulcers. One patient with high bleeding from both upper and lower GI tracts, fundal ulcers required subtotal gastrectomy perforations and fistula, and abdominal for ulcer resection and survived. The other abscesses. Many of these complications have patient underwent vagotomy and gastroen­ previously been described in renal transplan­ terostomy but the bleeding site was not recog­ nized. The 12 patients with untreated termi­ tation.' h Problems with biliary drainage have arisen both in the transplant, as has been nal enteric bleeds all demonstrated peptic described, and also in the gastrointestinal ulcer disease. Gastric ulcer was most tract where biliary--enteric continuity is rees­ frequent, followed by gastritis and duodenal tablished. Enteric leaks at this site constitute ulcer. Various types of gastric lavage were one group of gastrointestinal complications employed without benefit. unique to hepatic transplantation. The colon Nonpeptic upper gastrointestinal bleeding complications also appear distinct from those arose in a variety of cases (Table 2). Four encountered in renal transplantation and have patients bled from esophageal varices. While occurred in a much younger age group.7 varices persist endoscopically following he- Abdominal abscesses have been related to a variety of causes, and wide peritoneal drain­ From the Deparrmenl of Surgery. University oj age is advocated. Colorado Medical Center. and the Veterans Administra­ tion Hospital, Denver, Colo. Hemorrhage Suppor/ed in part by research grants from the Veter­ ans Administration, by Grants AM-I7260 and AM- Gastrointestinal bleeding has been one of 07772 from the National Institutes oj Health; and by the more frequent complications following GranIs RR-00051 and RR-00069 from the General liver transplantation. Relatively small enteric Clinical Research CenIers Program oj the Division of bleeds chemically detectable in stools or Research Resources, National Institutes of Health. gastric aspirate occur in the majority of trans­ Reprint requests should be addressed 10 L. J. Koep, Department of Surgery, Unil'ersily of Colorado Medical plant recipients. Clinically significant hem­ Center. Denver, Colo. 80262. orrhage occurred in 34/150 patients (23%). .c 1979 by Grune & Stratton. Inc In 12 of these 34 patients, definitive therapy 0041-/345/19/1101-0056$01.00/0 Transplantation Proceedmgs, Vol. XI, No. 1 (Marchi, '979 257 258 KOEP, STARZL. AND WElL Table 1. Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Peptic Disease Etiology Therapy Number Duodenal ulcer 5 Vagotomy and gastroenterostomy 1 (s) Vagotomy and pyloroplasty 3 (s) Gastric resection 2 (s) Gastroenterostomy only Gastric ulcer 2 Subtotal gastrectomy 1 (s) Vagotomy and gastroenterostomy Terminal peptic bleed No therapy 12 (s), Successful therapy, patic transplantation, they do not bleed in the discovered at autopsy. There were individual absence of portal-vein thrombosis. All four cases of bleeding from operative trauma to patients with variceal bleeding demonstrated the small bowel. small bowel ulcers, disrup­ either thrombosis or cavernous transforma­ tion of a duodenostomy closure, and cystic tion of the portal vein. The Sengstaken­ artery bleeding at the gallbladder anastomo­ Blakemore tube was used in all four patients SIS. with temporary success. One patient went on Lower gastrointestinal bleeding was some­ to sclerotherapy of his varices, but again bled times difficult to distinguish clinically from several days later, requiring ligation of duodenal bleeding (Table 3). Three patients varices. This operative ligation appeared had ulcerations in the right colon and under­ unduly treacherous because of the recent went either right or subtotal colectomy. None sclerotherapy, the esophagus being edema­ survived. Two patients had massive colonic tous and friable. bleeds from pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis The enteroentrostomy of the Roux-en-Y involving the colon. Both survived following jejunostomy was the site of bleeding in two subtotal colectomies. patients. In neither patient was it identified Gastrointestinal bleeding has arisen at clinically. One patient underwent pyloro­ intervals of several days to over a year post­ plasty before the enteroenterostomy was transplant. Frequently, small enteric bleeds opened and the bleeding site ligated. The occur during this interval. and because these other patient had both an abscess and bleed­ bleeds may be the prelude to a later hemody­ ing from the enteroenterostomy, which was namically significant bleed, vigorous diagnos- Table 2. Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Nonpeptic Disease Etiology Therapy Number Esophageal varicies 4 Sengstaken· Blakemore 4 Sclerotherapy 1 Oversew 1 (s) Enteroenterostomy 2 (Roux·en-Y) Repair 2 (5) Small bowel 2 Operative trauma Resection Small bowel ulcers Pyloroplasty Disrupted duodenal closure Repair Gallbladder (cystic artery bleed) Repair (5). Successful therapy, - GASTROINTESTINAL COMPLICATIONS OF HEPATIC lRANSPLANTATION 259 Table 3. Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding Table 4. Enteric Leaks Secondary to Biliary Drainage EtIology Therapy Number No Leaks EtIology (No. Procedures) Cecal ulceration 3 5 (65) Right celectomy 2 Cholecystoduodenostomy 6 (14) lIeoprectostomy Choledochoduodenostomy Roux-en-Y jejunostomy Pneumatosis (at new enteroenterostomy) 8 (48) Cystoides 2 Roux·en-Y jejunostomy Intestinales lIeoproctostomy 2 (5) (at choledochoJejunostomy) 1 (26) (s). Successful therapy. tic maneuvers are indicated. Vital signs, alternative biliary drainage and either drain­ hemoglobulin levels, and overt and occult ing or closing the duodenum. enteric blood loss are carefully monitored. Currently, when choledochocholedochos­ Panendoscopy has been crucial in all bleeding tomy is not feasible, Roux-en-Y jejunostomy episodes regardless of how minor they appear. to either gallbladder or common duct is Colonoscopy has been used but has not had a preferred. Enteric leaks have arisen at the direct therapeutic benefit. Proctoscopy is enteroenterostomy in 17% of the newly useful. as anal disease is quite frequent, and constructed Roux-en-Y jejunostomies. Leak­ the bleeding site sometimes is obscure even at ing enteroenterostomies have been corrected surgery. Radiographic studies have been help­ by reinforcing small leaks or reconstructing ful in minor bleeding, but in the major bleeds the anastomosis. Of these eight repairs, two included here. hemodynamic instability pre­ needed revision. One reinforced leak dis­ cluded this delay. rupted, requiring reconstruction of the entero­ enterostomy. The other, also a reinforced Perforation leak, developed a second leak a t a separate Gastrointestinal perforations and fistulas site that had not appeared compromised at were less frequent but even more lethal the previous laparotomy. This site was complications than bleeding. The preponder­ successfully reinforced. While leaks at the ance of leaks were secondary to the establish­ enteroenterostomy may occur at any time up ment of biliary drainage. In the 150 patients to 4 weeks, once this anastomosis has healed, in this series, 198 biliary procedures have the raux limb biliary drainage may be safely been performed. ChoIedcichocholedochostomy revised at the free end if necessary. The obviates the need for entry into the gastroin­ existence of a preexisting Roux-en-Y jejunos­ testinal t.ract and thus eliminates enteric leaks tomy is thus regarded as an asset among from biliary drainage. This has been used in potential transplant recipients. Like the duo­ 33 patients and is our preference for adults denal fistulas. these enteroenterostomy leaks with suitable ducts. Cholecystoduodenostomy have been highly lethal with only one survivor was the earliest drainage technique and has a among eight leaks. low incidence of leakage (8%). but was aban­ Unfortunately. the existence of a previous doned for other reasons (Table 4). The ma­ Roux-en-Y jejunostomy implies previous he­ jority of the 14 choledochoduodenostomies patic surgery. Previous Roux-en-Ys have were conversions from previous cholecysto­ been injured three times during particularly duodenostomies. The incidence of leakage in difficult hepatectomies resulting in fistulas choledochoduodenostomies
Recommended publications
  • Association Between Gastric Myoelectric Activity Disturbances and Dyspeptic T Symptoms in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients ⁎ Aneta L
    Advances in Medical Sciences 64 (2019) 44–53 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Advances in Medical Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/advms Original research article Association between gastric myoelectric activity disturbances and dyspeptic T symptoms in gastrointestinal cancer patients ⁎ Aneta L. Zygulskaa, , Agata Furgalab, Krzysztof Krzemienieckia,c,1, Beata Wlodarczykb, Piotr Thorb a Department of Oncology, University Hospital in Cracow, Cracow, Poland b Department of Pathophysiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland c Department of Oncology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Purpose: Dyspeptic symptoms present a severe problem in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients. The aim of the Gastrointestinal carcinoma study was to analyze an association between gastric myoelectric activity changes and dyspeptic symptoms in Gastric motility gastrointestinal cancer patients. Gastric myoelectric activity Material and Methods: The study included 80 patients (37 men and 43 women, mean age 61.2 ± 7.8 years) Electrogastrography diagnosed with GI tract malignancies: colon (group A), rectal (group B) and gastric cancers (group C). Gastric Dyspeptic symptoms myoelectric activity in a preprandial and postprandial state was determined by means of a 4-channel electro- gastrography. Autonomic nervous system was studied based on heart rate variability analysis. The results were compared with the data from healthy asymptomatic controls. Results: In a fasted state, GI cancer patients presented with lesser percentages of normogastria time (A:44.23 vs. B:46.5 vs. C:47.10 vs. Control:78.2%) and average percentage slow wave coupling (ACSWC) (A:47.1 vs. B:50.8 vs. C:47.2 vs. Control:74.9%), and with higher values of dominant power (A:12.8 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Parameters for the Treatment of Patients with Dominantly Inherited Colorectal Cancer
    Practice Parameters For The Treatment Of Patients With Dominantly Inherited Colorectal Cancer Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2003;46(8):1001-1012 Prepared by: The Standards Task Force The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons James Church, MD; Clifford Simmang, MD; On Behalf of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Colorectal Cancer and the Standards Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons is dedicated to assuring high quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The standards committee is composed of Society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This Committee was created in order to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive, and not prescriptive. Their purpose is to provide information on which decisions can be made, rather than dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. Practice Parameters for the Treatment of Patients With Dominantly Inherited Colorectal Cancer Inherited colorectal cancer includes two main syndromes in which predisposition to the disease is based on a germline mutation that may be transmitted from parent to child.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoscopy Rotation Coordination and Goals and Objects Department of Surgery Stanford School of Medicine (8/15/17, Jnl)
    Endoscopy Rotation Coordination And Goals and Objects Department of Surgery Stanford School of Medicine (8/15/17, jnl) Rotation Director: James Lau, MD ATTENDINGS and CONTACT INFORMATION Cell Phone E-mail Address James Lau, MD (702) 306-8780 [email protected] Homero Rivas, MD MBA (972) 207-2381 [email protected] Dan Azagury, MD (650) 248-3173 [email protected] Shai Friedland, MD [email protected] Andrew Shelton, MD [email protected] Natalie Kirilcuk, MD [email protected] Cindy Kin, MD [email protected] Laren Becker, MD [email protected] Jennifer Pan, MD [email protected] Suzanne Matsui, MD [email protected] Ramsey Cheung, MD [email protected] KEYPOINT The key for this rotation is that you need to show initiative. TEXT Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: The Fundamentals. Sixth Edition. By Peter B. Cotton, Christopher B. Williams, Robert H. Hawes and Brian P. Saunders. You are responsible for the material to enhance your understanding and supplement your past experiences. Lots of pictures and tips and tricks. Quick read. Copy of text available for purchase on Amazon.com or for check out from the Lane Library. Procedure Schedule Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Laren Becker Jennifer Pan Shelton/Kirilcuk/Kin Ramsey Suzanne (VA (VA Colonoscopy 8:00 am Cheung (VA Matsui (VA Livermore) Livermore) (Stanford Endoscopy) Livermore) Livermore) Every other Tuesday Rivas/Lau alternating Upper/Occasional Lower 1 Endoscopy 9a-1p (Stanford Endoscopy) Suzanne Matsui (VA Livermore) The Staff Drs. Becker, Cheung, Pan, and Matsui are gastroenterologists that perform 75% colonoscopies and 25% upper endoscopies at the Livermore location for the Palo Alto VA.
    [Show full text]
  • Colon and Rectal Surgery Case Log Instructions Review Committee for Colon and Rectal Surgery
    Colon and Rectal Surgery Case Log Instructions Review Committee for Colon and Rectal Surgery Background The ACGME Case Log System is a data depository which provides a mechanism that supports programs in complying with requirements, and also provides a uniform mechanism to verify the clinical education of residents among programs. The Case Log System is designed to capture and categorize a resident’s experience with patient care. It was initially instituted in 2001, and the Review Committee for Colon and Rectal Surgery has required its use by accredited programs since 2005. It is the intention of the Review Committee for Colon and Rectal Surgery that each resident has a reasonably equivalent educational experience to prepare for the practice of the specialty. As part of the process, the case numbers for each resident completing a program are collected and analyzed. To accomplish this complex task, a structured database has been created using standard codes for diagnoses and procedures. The Case Log System helps assess the breadth and depth of clinical experience provided to each colon and rectal surgery resident by his or her program with the ultimate goal of improving the programs themselves. It is the responsibility of the individual residents to accurately and in a timely manner enter their case data. The data entered will be monitored by the program directors and analyzed by the Review Committee. Separate analysis reports are created annually for the Committee, for program directors, and for residents. Additionally, the ACGME provides information regarding individual residents’ experience to the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery (ABCRS) as one criterion for their admission to the ABCRS’s exam process.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastroenterostomy and Vagotomy for Chronic Duodenal Ulcer
    Gut, 1969, 10, 366-374 Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.10.5.366 on 1 May 1969. Downloaded from Gastroenterostomy and vagotomy for chronic duodenal ulcer A. W. DELLIPIANI, I. B. MACLEOD1, J. W. W. THOMSON, AND A. A. SHIVAS From the Departments of Therapeutics, Clinical Surgery, and Pathology, The University ofEdinburgh The number of operative procedures currently in Kingdom answered a postal questionnaire. Eight had vogue in the management of chronic duodenal ulcer died since operation, and three could not be traced. The indicates that none has yet achieved definitive status. patients were questioned particularly with regard to Until recent years, partial gastrectomy was the eating capacity, dumping symptoms, vomiting, ulcer-type dyspepsia, diarrhoea or other change in bowel habit, and favoured operation, but an increasing awareness of a clinical assessment was made based on a modified its significant operative mortality and its metabolic Visick scale. The mean time since operation was 6-9 consequences, along with Dragstedt and Owen's years. demonstration of the effectiveness of vagotomy in Thirty-five patients from this group were admitted to reducing acid secretion (1943), has resulted in the hospital for a full investigation of gastrointestinal and widespread use of vagotomy and gastric drainage. related function two to seven years following their The success of duodenal ulcer surgery cannot be operation. Most were volunteers, but some were selected judged only on low stomal (or recurrent) ulceration because of definite complaints. There were more females rates; the other sequelae of gastric operations must than males (21 females and 14 males). The following be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Oral Anticoagulants and Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy with Hospitalization for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding
    Supplementary Online Content Ray WA, Chung CP, Murray KT, et al. Association of oral anticoagulants and proton pump inhibitor cotherapy with hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.17242 eAppendix. PPI Co-therapy and Anticoagulant-Related UGI Bleeds This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/02/2021 Appendix: PPI Co-therapy and Anticoagulant-Related UGI Bleeds Table 1A Exclusions: end-stage renal disease Diagnosis or procedure code for dialysis or end-stage renal disease outside of the hospital 28521 – anemia in ckd 5855 – Stage V , ckd 5856 – end stage renal disease V451 – Renal dialysis status V560 – Extracorporeal dialysis V561 – fitting & adjustment of extracorporeal dialysis catheter 99673 – complications due to renal dialysis CPT-4 Procedure Codes 36825 arteriovenous fistula autogenous gr 36830 creation of arteriovenous fistula; 36831 thrombectomy, arteriovenous fistula without revision, autogenous or 36832 revision of an arteriovenous fistula, with or without thrombectomy, 36833 revision, arteriovenous fistula; with thrombectomy, autogenous or nonaut 36834 plastic repair of arteriovenous aneurysm (separate procedure) 36835 insertion of thomas shunt 36838 distal revascularization & interval ligation, upper extremity 36840 insertion mandril 36845 anastomosis mandril 36860 cannula declotting; 36861 cannula declotting; 36870 thrombectomy, percutaneous, arteriovenous
    [Show full text]
  • 374 Part 876—Gastroenterology
    § 874.5550 21 CFR Ch. I (4–1–08 Edition) Drug Administration on or before July subpart E of part 807 of this chapter 13, 1999 for any tongs antichoke device subject to § 874.9. that was in commercial distribution [51 FR 40389, Nov. 6, 1986, as amended at 65 before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or FR 2316, Jan. 14, 2000] before July 13, 1999, been found to be substantially equivalent to a tongs antichoke device that was in commer- PART 876—GASTROENTEROLOGY- cial distribution before May 28, 1976. UROLOGY DEVICES Any other tongs antichoke device shall have an approved PMA or declared Subpart A—General Provisions completed PDP in effect before being Sec. placed in commercial distribution. 876.1 Scope. 876.3 Effective dates of requirement for pre- [51 FR 40389, Nov. 6, 1986, as amended at 64 market approval. FR 18329, Apr. 14, 1999] 876.9 Limitations of exemptions from sec- tion 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, § 874.5550 Powered nasal irrigator. and Cosmetic Act (the act). (a) Identification. A powered nasal irrigator is an AC-powered device in- Subpart B—Diagnostic Devices tended to wash the nasal cavity by 876.1075 Gastroenterology-urology biopsy means of a pressure-controlled pul- instrument. sating stream of water. The device con- 876.1300 Ingestible telemetric gastro- sists of a control unit and pump con- intestinal capsule imaging system. nected to a spray tube and nozzle. 876.1400 Stomach pH electrode. (b) Classification. Class I (general con- 876.1500 Endoscope and accessories. trols). The device is exempt from the 876.1620 Urodynamics measurement system.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoscopy Matrix
    Endoscopy Matrix CPT Description of Endoscopy Diagnostic Therapeutic Code (Surgical) 31231 Nasal endoscopy, diagnostic, unilateral or bilateral (separate procedure) X 31233 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, diagnostic with maxillary sinusoscopy (via X inferior meatus or canine fossa puncture) 31235 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, diagnostic with sphenoid sinusoscopy (via X puncture of sphenoidal face or cannulation of ostium) 31237 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with biopsy, polypectomy or X debridement (separate procedure) 31238 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with control of hemorrhage X 31239 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with dacryocystorhinostomy X 31240 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with concha bullosa resection X 31241 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with ligation of sphenopalatine artery X 31253 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with ethmoidectomy, total (anterior X and posterior), including frontal sinus exploration, with removal of tissue from frontal sinus, when performed 31254 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with ethmoidectomy, partial (anterior) X 31255 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with ethmoidectomy, total (anterior X and posterior 31256 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with maxillary antrostomy X 31257 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with ethmoidectomy, total (anterior X and posterior), including sphenoidotomy 31259 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with ethmoidectomy, total (anterior X and posterior), including sphenoidotomy, with removal of tissue from the sphenoid sinus 31267 Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with removal of
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions of Bariatric Surgery CPT-4 Codes Description 43770
    Appendix A: Definitions of Bariatric Surgery CPT-4 Description Codes 43770 Laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive procedure: placement of adjustable gastric band 43644 Laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive procedure with gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy (roux limb 150 cm or less) 43645 Laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive with gastric bypass and small intestine reconstruction to limit absorption 43842 Gastric restrictive procedure, without gastric bypass, for morbid obesity, vertical banded gastroplasty 43843 Other gastric restrictive procedures, without gastric bypass, and other than Vertical Banded Gastroplasty 43844 Laparoscopic gastric restrictive procedure with gastric bypass and Roux en Y gastroenterostomy 43845 Gastric restrictive procedure with partial gastrectomy, pylorus-preserving duodenoileostomy and ileolieostomy to limit absorption (BPD) 43846 Gastric restrictive procedure, with gastric bypass, for morbid obesity; with short limb (less than 100 cm) Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy 43847 Gastric restrictive procedure, with small intestine reconstruction to limit absorption; with long limb (>150 cm) Roux-en-Y 43659 Gastrectomy, total; with Roux-en-Y reconstruction; Mini -gastric bypass S2082 Laparoscopy, surgical; gastric restrictive procedure, adjustable gastric band includes placement of subcutaneous port S2085 Laparoscopic gastric bypass ICD-9 Description Codes 44.68 Laparoscopic gastroplasty Banding Silastic vertical banding Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) Code also any synchronous laparoscopic
    [Show full text]
  • Public Use Data File Documentation
    Public Use Data File Documentation Part III - Medical Coding Manual and Short Index National Health Interview Survey, 1995 From the CENTERSFOR DISEASECONTROL AND PREVENTION/NationalCenter for Health Statistics U.S. DEPARTMENTOF HEALTHAND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics CDCCENTERS FOR DlSEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTlON Public Use Data File Documentation Part Ill - Medical Coding Manual and Short Index National Health Interview Survey, 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHAND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, Maryland October 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I. INTRODUCTION AND ORIENTATION GUIDES A. Brief Description of the Health Interview Survey ............. .............. 1 B. Importance of the Medical Coding ...................... .............. 1 C. Codes Used (described briefly) ......................... .............. 2 D. Appendix III ...................................... .............. 2 E, The Short Index .................................... .............. 2 F. Abbreviations and References ......................... .............. 3 G. Training Preliminary to Coding ......................... .............. 4 SECTION II. CLASSES OF CHRONIC AND ACUTE CONDITIONS A. General Rules ................................................... 6 B. When to Assign “1” (Chronic) ........................................ 6 C. Selected Conditions Coded ” 1” Regardless of Onset ......................... 7 D. When to Assign
    [Show full text]
  • Digestive Endoscopy in Five Decades
    ■ COLLEGE LECTURES Digestive endoscopy in five decades Peter B Cotton ABSTRACT – The world of gastroenterology scopy. So-called semi-flexible gastroscopes were changed forever when flexible endoscopes cumbersome and used infrequently by only a few became available in the 1960s. Diagnostic and enthusiasts. therapeutic techniques proliferated and entered the mainstream of medicine, not without some Diagnostic endoscopy controversy. Success resulted in a huge service demand, with the need to train more endo- The first truly flexible gastroscope was developed in 1 This paper is scopists and to organise large endoscopy units the USA, following pioneering work on fibre-optic 2 based on the Lilly and teams of staff. The British health service light transmission in the UK by Harold Hopkins. Lecture given at struggled with insufficient numbers of consul- However, commercial production of endoscopes was the Royal College tants, other staff and resources, and British rapidly dominated by Japanese companies, building of Physicians on endoscopy fell behind that of most other devel- on their earlier expertise with intragastric cameras. 12 April 2005 by oped countries. This situation is now being My involvement began in 1968, whilst doing bench Peter B Cotton addressed aggressively, with many local and research with Dr Brian Creamer at St Thomas’ MD FRCP FRCS, national initiatives aimed at improving access and Hospital, London. An expert in coeliac disease (and Medical Director, choice, and at promoting and documenting jejunal biopsy), he opined that gastroscopy might Digestive Disease quality. Many more consultants are needed and become useful and legitimate only if it became pos- Center, Medical some should be relieved of their internal medi- sible to take target biopsy specimens – since no one University of South Carolina, cine commitment to focus on their specialist seriously believed what endoscopists said that they Charleston, USA skills.
    [Show full text]
  • GASTROENTEROSTOMY AFTER THREE to FIVE YEARS by B
    Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.31.360.511 on 1 October 1955. Downloaded from 5"I THE RESULT OF VAGOTOMY AND GASTROENTEROSTOMY AFTER THREE TO FIVE YEARS By B. V. McEvEDY, F.R.C.S. Senior Registrar, University College Hospital, London and G. K. KIRKLAND, M.B., Ch.B., D.P.H. Assistant Surgeon, Oldham Royal Infirmary and Ancoats Hospital It is only iI years since Lester Dragstedt re- personally; while questionnaire follow-up has introduced vagal section in the treatment of peptic been criticized as inaccurate, it is of interest that ulcers, yet in this short period, after attaining a no case seen was worse than the questionnaire had popularity almost equal to that of partial gas- implied while several were better. The series con- trectomy, the operation has fallen into disrepute sisted of I75 duodenal ulcer and nine jejunal ulcer and is now rarely performed. Despite the many patients. Protected by copyright. failures large numbers of patients have been cured Of the I84 cases operated upon two died in the by vagotomy although the different factors pro- immediate post-operative period, both from in- ducing success or failu"re have not been adequately testinal obstruction. One was a case of malrotation elucidated. In the three years prior to I948 it was of the gut and death was from massive volvulus, shown that vagotomy was contra-indicated for while in the second case the obstruction was due -gastric ulcers and that for duodenal ulcers a to old tuberculous adhesion4 around the terminal gastroenterostomy must also be performed to ileum.
    [Show full text]