The Cell Membrane: a Historical Narration
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bacterial Cell Membrane
BACTERIAL CELL MEMBRANE Dr. Rakesh Sharda Department of Veterinary Microbiology NDVSU College of Veterinary Sc. & A.H., MHOW CYTOPLASMIC MEMBRANE ➢The cytoplasmic membrane, also called a cell membrane or plasma membrane, is about 7 nanometers (nm; 1/1,000,000,000 m) thick. ➢It lies internal to the cell wall and encloses the cytoplasm of the bacterium. ➢It is the most dynamic structure of a prokaryotic cell. Structure of cell membrane ➢The structure of bacterial plasma membrane is that of unit membrane, i.e., a fluid phospholipid bilayer, composed of phospholipids (40%) and peripheral and integral proteins (60%) molecules. ➢The phospholipids of bacterial cell membranes do not contain sterols as in eukaryotes, but instead consist of saturated or monounsaturated fatty acids (rarely, polyunsaturated fatty acids). ➢Many bacteria contain sterol-like molecules called hopanoids. ➢The hopanoids most likely stabilize the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. ➢The phospholipids are amphoteric molecules with a polar hydrophilic glycerol "head" attached via an ester bond to two non-polar hydrophobic fatty acid tails. ➢The phospholipid bilayer is arranged such that the polar ends of the molecules form the outermost and innermost surface of the membrane while the non-polar ends form the center of the membrane Fluid mosaic model ➢The plasma membrane contains proteins, sugars, and other lipids in addition to the phospholipids. ➢The model that describes the arrangement of these substances in lipid bilayer is called the fluid mosaic model ➢Dispersed within the bilayer are various structural and enzymatic proteins, which carry out most membrane functions. ➢Some membrane proteins are located and function on one side or another of the membrane (peripheral proteins). -
Construction and Loss of Bacterial Flagellar Filaments
biomolecules Review Construction and Loss of Bacterial Flagellar Filaments Xiang-Yu Zhuang and Chien-Jung Lo * Department of Physics and Graduate Institute of Biophysics, National Central University, Taoyuan City 32001, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 4 November 2020; Published: 9 November 2020 Abstract: The bacterial flagellar filament is an extracellular tubular protein structure that acts as a propeller for bacterial swimming motility. It is connected to the membrane-anchored rotary bacterial flagellar motor through a short hook. The bacterial flagellar filament consists of approximately 20,000 flagellins and can be several micrometers long. In this article, we reviewed the experimental works and models of flagellar filament construction and the recent findings of flagellar filament ejection during the cell cycle. The length-dependent decay of flagellar filament growth data supports the injection-diffusion model. The decay of flagellar growth rate is due to reduced transportation of long-distance diffusion and jamming. However, the filament is not a permeant structure. Several bacterial species actively abandon their flagella under starvation. Flagellum is disassembled when the rod is broken, resulting in an ejection of the filament with a partial rod and hook. The inner membrane component is then diffused on the membrane before further breakdown. These new findings open a new field of bacterial macro-molecule assembly, disassembly, and signal transduction. Keywords: self-assembly; injection-diffusion model; flagellar ejection 1. Introduction Since Antonie van Leeuwenhoek observed animalcules by using his single-lens microscope in the 18th century, we have entered a new era of microbiology. -
IB DIPLOMA PROGRAMME Debora M
OXFORD IB PREPARED BIOLOGY IB DIPLOMA PROGRAMME Debora M. Primrose Contents Introduction iv 9 Plant biology (AHL) 1 Cell biology 9.1 Transport in the xylem of plants 103 9.2 Transport in the phloem of plants 107 1.1 Introduction to cells 2 9.3 Growth in plants 110 1.2 Ultrastructure of cells 4 9.4 Reproduction in plants 113 1.3 Membrane structure 6 1.4 Membrane transport 7 10 Genetics and evolution (AHL) 1.5 The origin of cells 9 10.1 Meiosis 117 1.6 Cell division 11 10.2 Inheritance 121 2 Molecular biology 10.3 Gene pools and speciation 125 2.1 Molecules to metabolism 14 11 Animal physiology (AHL) 2.2 Water 15 11.1 Antibody production and vaccination 128 2.3 Carbohydrates and lipids 16 11.2 Movement 133 2.4 Proteins 20 11.3 The kidney and osmoregulation 137 2.5 Enzymes 21 11.4 Sexual reproduction 141 2.6 Structure of DNA and RNA 23 2.7 DNA replication, transcription and translation 24 12 Data-based and practical questions 147 2.8 Cell respiration 26 2.9 Photosynthesis 28 A Neurobiology and behaviour 3 Genetics A.1 Neural development 157 A.2 The human brain 159 3.1 Genes 30 A.3 Perception of stimuli 161 3.2 Chromosomes 32 A.4 Innate and learned behaviour (AHL) 165 3.3 Meiosis 33 A.5 Neuropharmacology (AHL) 167 3.4 Inheritance 35 A.6 Ethology (AHL) 169 3.5 Genetic modification and biotechnology 37 B Biotechnology and bioinformatics 4 Ecology B.1 Microbiology: organisms in industry 172 4.1 Species, communities and ecosystems 40 B.2 Biotechnology in agriculture 174 4.2 Energy flow 43 B.3 Environmental protection 178 4.3 Carbon cycling 45 -
Living Cell Cytosol Stability to Segregation and Freezing-Out: Thermodynamic Aspect
1 Living Cell Cytosol Stability to Segregation and Freezing-Out: Thermodynamic aspect Viktor I. Laptev Russian New University, Moscow, Russian Federation The cytosol state in living cell is treated as homogeneous phase equilibrium with a special feature: the pressure of one phase is positive and the pressure of the other is negative. From this point of view the cytosol is neither solution nor gel (or sol as a whole) regardless its components (water and dissolved substances). This is its unique capability for selecting, sorting and transporting reagents to the proper place of the living cell without a so-called “pipeline”. To base this statement the theoretical investigation of the conditions of equilibrium and stability of the medium with alternative-sign pressure is carried out under using the thermodynamic laws and the Gibbs” equilibrium criterium. Keywords: living cellular processes; cytosol; intracellular fluid; cytoplasmic matrix; hyaloplasm matrix; segregation; freezing-out; zero isobare; negative pressure; homogeneous phase equilibrium. I. INTRODUCTION A. Inertial Motion in U,S,V-Space A full description of the thermodynamic state of a medium Cytosol in a living cell (intracellular fluid or cytoplasmic without chemical interactions is given by a relationship matrix, hyaloplasm matrix, aqueous cytoplasm) is a between the internal energy U, entropy S and volume V [5]. combination of the water dissolved substances. It places in the The mathematical procedure for a negative pressure supposes cell between the plasma membrane, the nucleus and a vacuole; using absolute values of the internal energy U and entropy S. it is a medium keeping granular-like and whisker-like The surface φ(U,S,V) = 0 corresponds to the all structures. -
Introduction to the Cell Cell History Cell Structures and Functions
Introduction to the cell cell history cell structures and functions CK-12 Foundation December 16, 2009 CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the “FlexBook,” CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning. Copyright ©2009 CK-12 Foundation This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. Contents 1 Cell structure and function dec 16 5 1.1 Lesson 3.1: Introduction to Cells .................................. 5 3 www.ck12.org www.ck12.org 4 Chapter 1 Cell structure and function dec 16 1.1 Lesson 3.1: Introduction to Cells Lesson Objectives • Identify the scientists that first observed cells. • Outline the importance of microscopes in the discovery of cells. • Summarize what the cell theory proposes. • Identify the limitations on cell size. • Identify the four parts common to all cells. • Compare prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Introduction Knowing the make up of cells and how cells work is necessary to all of the biological sciences. Learning about the similarities and differences between cell types is particularly important to the fields of cell biology and molecular biology. -
Anti-Duhring
Friedrich Engels Herr Eugen Dühring’s Revolution in Science Written: September 1876 - June 1878; Published: in Vorwärts, Jan 3 1877-July 7 1878; Published: as a book, Leipzig 1878; Translated: by Emile Burns from 1894 edition; Source: Frederick Engels, Anti-Dühring. Herr Eugen Dühring’s Revolution in Science, Progress Publishers, 1947; Transcribed: [email protected], August 1996; Proofed and corrected: Mark Harris 2010. Formerly known as Herr Eugen Dühring's Revolution in Science, Engels’ Anti-Dühring is a popular and enduring work which, as Engels wrote to Marx, was an attempt “to produce an encyclopaedic survey of our conception of the philosophical, natural-science and historical problems.” Marx and Engels first became aware of Professor Dühring with his December 1867 review of Capital, published in Ergänzungsblätter. They exchanged a series of letters about him from January-March 1868. He was largely forgotten until the mid-1870s, at which time Dühring entered Germany's political foreground. German Social-Democrats were influenced by both his Kritische Geschichte der Nationalökonomie und des Sozialismus and Cursus der Philosophie als streng wissenschaftlicher Weltanschauung und Lebensgestaltung. Among his readers were included Johann Most, Friedrich Wilhelm Fritzsche, Eduard Bernstein – and even August Bebel for a brief period. In March 1874, the Social-Democratic Workers’ Party paper Volksstaat ran an anonymous article (actually penned by Bebel) favorably reviewing one of Dühring's books. On both February 1 and April 21, 1875, Liebknecht encouraged Engels to take Dühring head-on in the pages of the Volksstaat. In February 1876, Engels fired an opening salvo with his Volksstaat article “Prussian Vodka in the German Reichstag”. -
MCB5068 Intro
Goals For MCB 5068 1. Obtain a solid foundation of knowledge in cell biology 2. Obtain a working knowledge of available techniques. 3. Be able to critically read and evaluate the scientific literature. 4. Be able to define and investigate a biological problem. Molecular Cell Biology 5068 To Do: Visit website: www.mcb5068.wustl.edu Sign up for course. Check out Self Assessment homework under Mercer- Introduction Visit Discussion Sections: Read “Official” Instructions TA’s: 1st Session: Nana Owusu-Boaitey [email protected] 2nd Session: Shankar Parajuli [email protected] 3rd Session: Jeff Kremer [email protected] What is Cell Biology? biochemistry genetics cytology physiology Molecular Cell Biology CELL BIOLOGY/MICROSCOPE Microscope first built in 1595 by Hans and Zacharias Jensen in Holland Zacharias Jensen CELL BIOLOGY/MICROSCOPE Robert Hooke accomplished in physics, astronomy, chemistry, biology, geology, and architecture. Invented universal joint, iris diaphragm, anchor escapement & balance spring, devised equation describing elasticity (“Hooke’s Law”). In 1665 publishes Micrographia CELL BIOLOGY/MICROSCOPE Robert Hooke . “I could exceedingly plainly perceive it to be all perforated and porous, much like a Honey- comb, but that the pores of it were not regular. these pores, or cells, . were indeed the first microscopical pores I ever saw, and perhaps, that were ever seen, for I had not met with any Writer or Person, that had made any mention of them before this. .” CELL BIOLOGY/MICROSCOPE Antony van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) CELL BIOLOGY/MICROSCOPE Antony van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) a tradesman of Delft, Holland, in 1673, with no formal training, makes some of the most important discoveries in biology. -
The Population Problem Inherited Evolutio
2000 Earthlearningidea - http://www.earthlearningidea.com/ top edge of Sorting out the evolution of evolution headlines page Lay out your own timeline of how the theory of evolution developed Cut off the left hand edge of these four Earthlearningidea sheets and stick them together to form a timeline. Then stick it down on a bench or table. The ‘Evolution of evolution’ timeline Cut out the milestone boxes in the evolution of evolutionary theory below into strips. Leave the dates attached for less able pupils, but remove them for the more able. Then invite the pupils to sort out the headlines 1975 and place them in the correct places on the timeline – to show how evolutionary theory Photo: Chris King evolved. Species static This image is in the public The early part of the bible is interpreted to show that domain because species are static and there is no evolution. The date of its copyright has expired. 1650 creation of all species is calculated by Archbishop Ussher as 4004BC. Archbishop Ussher Evolution – but how? This image is in the public Early evolutionary ideas are presented by natural domain because 1740 philosophers, Pierre Maupertuis and Erasmus Darwin. its copyright has - expired. 1796 1950 Pierre Maupertuis The population problem This image is in the public Thomas Malthus publishes his idea that populations domain because increase geometrically (2,4,16) whilst food production its copyright has 1798 only increases arithmetically (2,3,4) so there must be expired. population crashes. Thomas Malthus Inherited evolution Permission is granted to copy, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck develops his evolutionary theory distribute and/or – that evolution occurs because offspring change in modify this document under 1800 response to the environment, and these changes are the terms of the inherited from their parents (later shown to be 1925 GNU Free incorrect). -
VDAC: the Channel at the Interface Between Mitochondria and the Cytosol
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 256/257: 107–115, 2004. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 107 VDAC: The channel at the interface between mitochondria and the cytosol Marco Colombini Department of Biology, University of Maryland, MD, USA Abstract The mitochondrial outer membrane is not just a barrier but a site of regulation of mitochondrial function. The VDAC family of proteins are the major pathways for metabolite flux through the outer membrane. These can be regulated in a variety of ways and the integration of these regulatory inputs allows mitochondrial metabolism to be adjusted to changing cellular conditions. This includes total blockage of the flux of anionic metabolites leading to permeabilization of the outer membrane to small proteins followed by apoptotic cell death. (Mol Cell Biochem 256/257: 107–115, 2004) Key words: mitochondrion, outer membrane, apoptosis, isoforms, metabolism Introduction author’s view, see also ref. [6] for an alternative view). In- formation on VDAC can also be found on the VDAC web Mitochondria live, function, and reproduce in a very rich and page: www.life.umd.edu/vdac. friendly environment, the cytosol of the eukaryotic cell. Just as the plasma membrane is the interface between the inter- stitial space and the cytosol, so the mitochondrial outer The VDAC channels: Conservation and membrane is the interface between the cytosol and the mi- tochondrial spaces. Both separate the cell or the organelle specialization from its environment and both act as selective barriers to the entry and exit of matter. These membranes are also logical VDAC channels (Fig. 1) from a wide variety of sources (plants sites for control. -
History of the Cell Theory All Living Organisms Are Composed of Cells, and All Cells Arise from Other Cells
History of the Cell Theory All living organisms are composed of cells, and all cells arise from other cells. These simple and powerful statements form the basis of the cell theory, first formulated by a group of European biologists in the mid-1800s. So fundamental are these ideas to biology that it is easy to forget they were not always thought to be true. Early Observations The invention of the microscope allowed the first view of cells. English physicist and microscopist Robert Hooke (1635–1702) first described cells in 1665. He made thin slices of cork and likened the boxy partitions he observed to the cells (small rooms) in a monastery. The open spaces Hooke observed were empty, but he and others suggested these spaces might be used for fluid transport in living plants. He did not propose, and gave no indication that he believed, that these structures represented the basic unit of Robert Hooke's microscope. Hooke living organisms. first described cells in 1665. Marcello Malpighi (1628–1694), and Hooke's colleague, Nehemiah Grew (1641–1712), made detailed studies of plant cells and established the presence of cellular structures throughout the plant body. Grew likened the cellular spaces to the gas bubbles in rising bread and suggested they may have formed through a similar process. The presence of cells in animal tissue was demonstrated later than in plants because the thin sections needed for viewing under the microscope are more difficult to prepare for animal tissues. The prevalent view of Hooke's contemporaries was that animals were composed of several types of fibers, the various properties of which accounted for the differences among tissues. -
The Still Valid Fluid Mosaic Model for Molecular Organization of Biomembranes: Accumulating Data Confirm It
DISCOVERIES 2013, Oct-Dec; 1(1): e7 DOI: 10.15190/d.2013.7 The still actual fluid mosaic model for membrane organization Focused REVIEW The still valid fluid mosaic model for molecular organization of biomembranes: accumulating data confirm it Mircea Leabu1,* 1University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine; “Victor Babes” National Institute of Pathology; University of Bucharest, Research Center for Applied Ethics *Correspondence to: Mircea Leabu, PhD, “Victor Babes” National Institute of Pathology, 99101, Splaiul Independentei, 050096, Bucharest, Romania; E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Leabu M. The still valid fluid mosaic model for molecular organization of biomembranes: accumulating data confirm it. Discoveries 2013, Oct-Dec; 1(1): e7. DOI: 10.15190/d.2013.7 ABSTRACT Keywords: membrane organization, membrane fluidity, membrane microdomains, Singer-Nicolson More than forty years passed since Singer and model, science history Nicolson launched the fluid mosaic model related to molecular organization and dynamics of cell Introduction membranes, applicable to endomembranes as well. For 20 years I and perhaps many other professors During this period of time, that will reach half a have been teaching students in medicine about the century soon, accumulating data all confirm, but not molecular organization of the cell membrane, infirm the brilliant idea of such a model. presenting with a high enthusiasm the fluid mosaic Sometimes, the results developed the model in a model launched by Seymour Jonathan Singer and very impacting manner, as was the case with the Garth L. Nicolson in 19721, and considering it as an introduction of the membrane microdomain concept inspired, still actual scientific and even pedagogic (mainly lipid rafts organization). -
Genome As a Multipurpose Structure Built by Evolution Michel Morange
1 Genome as a multipurpose structure built by evolution Michel Morange, Centre Cavaillès, République des savoirs USR 3608, Ecole normale supérieure, 29 rue d’Ulm, 75230 Paris Cedex05, France Email: [email protected] Abstract The publication in 2012 of the results of the ENCODE program generated an acrimonious debate about the role of junk DNA. This debate is a symptom of the difficulties of dovetailing functional and evolutionary descriptions of genomes. My argument is that extant genomes are the result of a progressive evolutionary construction. To the basic function – to give rise to RNA and proteins – have been successively added other functions – regulation by microRNA and epigenetic marks, for instance. This process of complexification was not a regular one, but the result of a complex evolutionary history, different for the different genomes. Better knowledge of the evolutionary history of genomes would help to understand these structures and their functions. Historians and philosophers of biology have amply discussed the difficulty, even the impossibility, of providing a precise definition of a gene (Beurton et al. 2000). The genome no longer appears as a collection of similar genes, but as a multitasking structure formed of different types of genetic elements (Gingeras 2006). Participants in these debates nonetheless often agree on one issue, that the genome is (and has to be) something well defined: a collection of genes, a 2 reservoir of junk DNA, or a structure filled with regulatory sequences. My point of view will be different: the genome is what evolution has progressively made of it. This vision has three important consequences.