DOCSLIB.ORG

Frontrunners for ERP Software Report Here

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ERP SOFTWARE MAY 2018 Powered by Methodology CONTENTS 3 Introduction 5 Defining ERP Software 6 FrontRunners (Small Vendors) 8 FrontRunners (Enterprise Vendors) 10 Runners Up 14 Methodology Basics 2 INTRODUCTION his FrontRunners analysis score of 3.49 for Usability and Tis a data-driven assessment 3.39 for User Recommended, identifying products in the Enterprise while the Small Vendor graphic Resource Planning (ERP) software had a minimum qualifying market that offer the best capability score of 3.75 for Usability and and value for small businesses. For a 3.67 for User Recommended. given market, products are evaluated and given a score for Usability To be considered for the ERP (x-axis) and User Recommendations FrontRunners, a product needed (y-axis). FrontRunners then plots 10- a minimum of 20 user reviews 15 products each on a Small Vendor published within 18 months of the and an Enterprise Vendor graphic, evaluation period. Products needed based on vendor business size, per a minimum user rating score of category. 3.0 for both Usability and User Recommended in both the Small In the ERP FrontRunners Vendor and Enterprise Vendor infographic, the Enterprise Vendor graphics. graphic had a minimum qualifying 3 INTRODUCTION The minimum score cutoff to be included in the FrontRunners graphic varies by category, depending on the range of scores in each category. No product with a score less than 3.0 in either dimension is included in any FrontRunners graphic. For products included, the Usability and User Recommended scores determine their positions on the FrontRunners graphic. 4 DEFINING ERP SOFTWARE nterprise Resource Planning is oriented to buyers in “product- E(ERP) software helps centric” industries such as organizations track information manufacturing, distribution, retail across all departments and etc. We identify this set of core business functions, from accounting capabilities for the Operational ERP to human resources to sales and category: core financials, human beyond, and leverages a shared capital management (HCM) and at database to provide a single “source least two of the following: inventory of truth” across modules. management, supply chain management, manufacturing and/ Software Advice’s FrontRunners or enterprise asset management. is focused on the North American Operational ERP market, which 5 FRONTRUNNERS (SMALL VENDORS) FRONTRUNNERS® FOR ERP, MAY 2018 4.8 MIE Trak Pro ePROMIS ERP Cetec ERP ERPNext Priority ERPAG Unanet Odoo IQMS Manufacturing ERP Global Shop Solutions Intacct ERP USER RECOMMENDED TrueERP 3.2 3.2 4.8 USABILITY For each individual rating in both the Usability and User Recommended criteria, the methodology weighs recent reviews more heavily. 6 FRONTRUNNERS SCORES (SMALL VENDORS) USER TOTAL USABILITY RECOMMENDED SCORE SCORE SCORE 1 ePROMIS ERP 9.23 4.61 4.63 2 MIE Trak Pro 9.02 4.40 4.63 3 ERPNext 9.02 4.47 4.55 4 Cetec ERP 8.91 4.31 4.61 5 ERPAG 8.87 4.45 4.42 6 Priority 8.76 4.34 4.42 7 Unanet 8.53 4.24 4.29 8 Odoo 8.31 4.07 4.24 9 IQMS Manufacturing ERP 8.17 4.10 4.08 10 Intacct ERP 7.83 3.97 3.86 11 Global Shop Solutions 7.82 3.79 4.03 12 TrueERP 7.42 3.75 3.67 7 FRONTRUNNERS (ENTERPRISE VENDORS) FRONTRUNNERS® FOR ERP, MAY 2018 4.8 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Microsoft Dynamics 365 SAP S/4HANA Deltek Maconomy Costpoint SAP Business One Microsoft Dynamics SL Deltek Vision NetSuite USER RECOMMENDED Microsoft Dynamics AX Sage 300cloud Sage 100cloud Microsoft Dynamics NAV Sage ERP Suite Epicor ERP 3.2 3.2 4.8 USABILITY For each individual rating in both the Usability and User Recommended criteria, the methodology weighs recent reviews more heavily. 8 FRONTRUNNERS SCORES (ENTERPRISE VENDORS) USER TOTAL USABILITY RECOMMENDED SCORE SCORE SCORE JD Edwards 1 EnterpriseOne 8.37 4.15 4.21 2 Microsoft Dynamics 365 8.17 4.17 3.99 3 Deltek Maconomy 7.86 4.00 3.86 4 SAP S/4HANA 7.81 3.90 3.91 5 Costpoint 7.74 3.92 3.82 6 NetSuite 7.68 3.96 3.72 7 Microsoft Dynamics SL 7.64 3.90 3.74 8 SAP Business One 7.63 3.86 3.77 9 Deltek Vision 7.55 3.81 3.74 10 Microsoft Dynamics AX 7.39 3.77 3.63 11 Sage 100cloud 7.30 3.79 3.50 12 Sage 300cloud 7.19 3.65 3.54 13 Sage ERP Suite 7.09 3.66 3.43 14 Epicor ERP 6.93 3.54 3.39 15 Microsoft Dynamics NAV 6.91 3.49 3.42 9 RUNNERS UP 1C:ERP 2 CBS FACTORY ERP 360 Enterprise Suite DEACOM ERP Software A2000 Deskera ERP aACE ERP Dolibarr ERP & CRM Academia ERP e-intelliprise accnu E2 Manufacturing System Accolent ERP ebizframe ERP AcTouch Ecount ERP Adjutant EFACS E/8 Alloy ERP Enterprise 21 ERP Apollo ERP Epicor MES APT ERP ERP MARK 7 axis diplomat ERP123 BlueCherry Erpisto BST10 Enterprise ESP21 BUSINESS by Miles Everest V7 canias ERP Evo ERP CBOS cloud ERP Exact Globe 10 Exact Macola iScala Expandable ERP JOBSCOPE Finesse ERP Kechie ERP Fitnet Manager Kenandy Cloud ERP FOCUS I Khaos Control Cloud Foundation 3000 Kloudville HansaWorld Standard ERP kpi.com IFS Applications Made2Manage ERP IFS Manufacturing MARG ERP 9+ InFocus ERP Masterplan ERP Infor CloudSuite Business MAX ERP Infor CloudSuite Industrial Metaal ERP Infor CloudSuite Industrial metasfresh Manufacturing Mobile Office Manager Infor Distribution SX.e MobileERP Infor EAM Multiview Financials Infor ERP MX ERP Infor M3 MyFiO ERP Infor VISUAL NebuCore Intuitive ERP NetSuite OneWorld INxSQL NetSuite SRP Iptor ERP for Distribution Oasis 11 Oneir Sage Business Cloud Financials Openbravo SAMPro Enterprise Oracle ERP Cloud SAP Business ByDesign ORCA Financial SapphireOne Orderhive Plus Saviom Enterprise Resource Management Ormandy Seradex ERP Paragon ERP simPRO Plexus Slingshot PrismERP Starta Produce Pro Step1 Distribution Suite Productive Stone Profit Systems Prophix Tally.ERP 9 QAD Cloud ERP The Plex Manufacturing Cloud QuickEasy BOS TSS ERP Ramco ERP Tygris ERP Rapid Response Manufacturing UNIT4 RealxERP Unit4 Business World Reflex ERP VasyERP RetailOps VersAccounts Ross ERP VertenSys S2K Enterprise Vista by Viewpoint Sage 300 Online 12 Visual EstiTrack Wherefour WinWeb WorkWise ERP XERP Xledger XoroERP xTuple Yunbit ERP 13 METHODOLOGY BASICS he FrontRunners methodology The User Recommended score is Tassesses and calculates a an overall weighted average of score for products on two primary scores including: dimensions: Usability on the x-axis • End-user ratings of one to five and User Recommended on the stars on how valuable users y-axis. consider the product to be relative to its price. The Usability score is a weighted average of user ratings including: • End-user ratings of one to five stars on how likely they are • End-user ratings of one to five to recommend the product to stars on the product’s ease of others. use. There are up to two FrontRunners • End-user ratings of one to graphics for each market, one Small five stars on the product’s functionality. Vendor and one Enterprise Vendor graphic. The Small Vendor graphic highlights qualifiers from smaller (by employee size) vendors, while 14 Methodology BASICS the Enterprise Vendor graphic displays qualifiers for larger (by employee size) vendors. Markets are defined by a core set of functionality, and to be eligible for FrontRunners, products must offer that core set of functionality. Core functionality required is determined by our research analysts, who provide coverage for and have familiarity with products in that market. Additionally, a product must have at least 20 unique user-submitted product reviews across the three Gartner Digital Markets web properties: softwareadvice.com, capterra.com and getapp.com, which must have been published within 18 months of start of the analysis period. Inclusion in the Small Vendor or Enterprise Vendor FrontRunners graphic is based on the vendor’s employee count. Vendors eligible for the Enterprise Vendor graphic must have more than the median employee count for all vendors in the market, or 100 employees—whichever is greater. Vendors whose employee counts do not meet either of those thresholds qualify for the Small Vendor graphic. 1 In the event fewer than 10 products qualify for either a Small Vendors or Enterprise Vendors FrontRunners graphic, the vendors that do qualify will be combined into a single graphic. 15 Powered by Methodology.
Recommended publications
  • Parul Institute of Engineering and Technology Computer Science & Engineering

    Parul Institute of Engineering and Technology Computer Science & Engineering

    WWW.VIDYARTHIPLUS.COM . PARUL INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (171605) PREPARED BY: KHUSHALI MISTRY PARUL INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY SUBJECT CODE: 171605 SUBJECT NAME :ERP INDEX S. NO. NAME OF PRACTICAL PAGE NO. Introduction to ERP System and Review on different ERP 1. 3 packages. 11 2. Study on Odoo ERP package. Identification and brief introduction of different Modules 3. 13 in Odoo ERP package. 4. Detail study of odoo erp modules. 16 5. Identify different process of the odoo erp modules. 20 6. Study on odoo erp business functions. 24 7. ERP Implementation life cycle at Huck International Inc. 26 2 PARUL INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY SUBJECT CODE: 171605 SUBJECT NAME :ERP Practical: 1 Aim: Introduction to ERP System and Review on different ERP packages. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) :- Enterprise resource planning (ERP) is business process management software that allows an organization to use a system of integrated applications to manage the business and automate many back office functions related to technology, services and human resources. Figure:1 Introduction to ERP Evolution of ERP The term ERP was coined in 1990 by Gartner, but its roots date to the 1960s. Back then, the concept applied to inventory management and control in the manufacturing sector. Software engineers created programs to monitor inventory, reconcile balances, and report on status. By the 1970s, this had evolved into Material Requirements Planning (MRP) systems for scheduling production processes. In the 1980s, MRP grew to encompass more manufacturing processes, prompting many to call it MRP-II or Manufacturing Resource Planning.
  • Comité Gestion - Organisation - Formation Des Entreprises

    Comité Gestion - Organisation - Formation Des Entreprises

    Conseil Supérieur de l’Ordre des Experts-Comptables AL / RG - 17/09/2013 Comité gestion - organisation - formation des entreprises Panorama des outils de gestion existants sur le marché Lors de la première réunion du comité gestion, organisation et formation des entreprises du Conseil supérieur qui s’est tenue le 15 mai 2013, il a été décidé d’effectuer une recherche afin d’obtenir un panorama représentatif des outils de gestion existant sur le marché. La liste des outils cités dans cette étude est bien entendu non exhaustive. Méthodologie : nous avons parcouru les sites internet d’éditeurs de logiciels afin de connaître ceux qui commercialisent des logiciels de gestion destinés aux cabinets d’expertise-comptable et/ou aux entreprises clientes des cabinets. Nous avons également recherché les outils développés au sein de l’institution (formations CFPC et outils congrès sur le thème de la gestion,…) Sources utilisées pour la recherche d’informations : - Les sites internet des éditeurs de logiciels - Une étude sur le sujet du département études techniques du CSOEC datant d’août 2006 - Le catalogue formations 2012/2013 du Centre de Formation de la Profession Comptable (CFPC) - Informations recueillies sur les logiciels de gestion sur Wikipédia - Site internet du Conseil Supérieur de l’Ordre des Experts-Comptables Le document comprend trois parties : - Première partie : SSII proposant des ERP aux entreprises d’une certaine taille (y compris grands cabinets) - Deuxième partie : logiciels de gestion adaptés aux plus petites structures, cœur de cible : les cabinets d’expertise-comptable qui peuvent proposer à leurs entreprises clientes de gérer certaines parties de leurs activités (facturation, devis, paie, comptabilité client et fournisseur, leurs immobilisations) via l’utilisation de différents modules du logiciel choisi.
  • Paper Title (Use Style: Paper Title)

    Paper Title (Use Style: Paper Title)

    A selection model of ERP system in mobile ERP design science research Case study: mobile ERP usability Khalil Omar Jorge Marx Gómez Department of Computing Science Department of Computing Science University of Oldenburg University of Oldenburg Oldenburg, Germany Oldenburg, Germany [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— Nowadays, mobile apps penetrate in every aspect Two complementary but distinct research paradigms of our daily life, due to the proliferation of mobile devices, the characterize much of the research in IS discipline namely: constant advances in mobile computing, and the enormous leaps behavioural science and design science [9]. The behavioural of mobile HCI. Thus, these factors have increased the demands to science paradigm has its roots in natural science research adopt the mobile ERP as a working model in enterprises. methods; it seeks to develop and verify theories that explain or Regardless of these demands, mobile ERP has several challenges predict human or organizational behaviour [9]. Whereas design and issues that need to be addressed through a problem the science paradigm is considered a problem-solving paradigm, design science research paradigm, since this paradigm is and it has its roots in engineering and the sciences of the considered a problem-solving paradigm and it has its roots in artificial [9]. The latter is accepted as a valid and valuable engineering and the sciences of the artificial. Accordingly, this research methodology by the engineering research culture, due paper aims to propose a model for selecting an appropriate ERP system within the mobile ERP’s design science research domain.
  • NOTE: to Submit Assignment

    NOTE: to Submit Assignment

    Submission guidelines • The due date for submission: October 24, Tuesday, 14:00. • This task should be prepared INDIVIDUALLY. In case of finding similar works, each student accused in cheating will get grade ZERO. • Please, select ONE topic for presentation from the list below. Topic Topic Presentation Title Presentation Title # # 01 Sage Live 16 Microsoft Dynamics GP 2016 R2 02 Sage Intacct 17 Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012 R3 03 Sage 50 Accounting 18 Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2017 04 Sage 300 ERP 19 Microsoft Dynamics SL 2015 05 Sage One 20 Microsoft Dynamics C5 2016 06 Epicor Financial Management 21 Info-Accountant 10 07 QuickBooks Premier (Contractor edition) 22 BEST-5 08 QuickBooks Premier (Nonprofit edition) 23 Galaktica-Parus 09 QuickBooks Premier (Retail edition) 24 Cougar Mountain DENALI QuickBooks Premier (Professional (Accountek) Connected 10 25 Services edition) Accounting & ERP QuickBooks Premier (Manufacturing 11 26 CCH Tagetik edition) 12 QuickBooks Online 27 UNIT4 Financials 13 QuickBooks Enterprise Solutions 2017 28 Dynac 14 Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1 29 AccuFund Accounting Suite 15 SAP Business One 9.2 30 SBS Financials • Items to be submitted: Microsoft PowerPoint file (.PPT or .PPTX) with your presentation. (minimum 20 slides, including TITLE slide, main part, and slide with references to sources of information used; presentation should contain information sections describing the topic, as well as graphical materials (e.g. pictures, charts, screenshots, etc.); name of file should start with your Student ID, and be followed by underscore symbol & presentation title, e.g. 20131550_ Sage Live.ppt) • All information must be in ENGLISH!!! • Completed PowerPoint presentation should be submitted to the location below from KIMEP University's Intranet.
  • Microsoft Dynamics Erpis Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

    Microsoft Dynamics Erpis Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

    Microsoft Dynamics ERP is enterprise resource planning (ERP) software primarily geared toward midsize organizations as well as subsidiaries and divisions of larger organizations. Its applications are part of Microsoft Dynamics, a line of business management software owned and developed by Microsoft. Microsoft Dynamics ERP comprises four primary products: Microsoft Dynamics AX, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, and Microsoft Dynamics SL. Products[edit] Microsoft Dynamics ERP includes five primary products: Microsoft Dynamics AX (formerly Axapta) is designed to help organizations do business across locations and countries by standardizing processes and helping to simplify compliance. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012. Microsoft Dynamics GP (formerly Great Plains Software) can help companies adapt to new opportunities and growth by managing changing markets, enabling unique business requirements, and connecting business processes across the organization. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics GP 2010 (version 11.0). Microsoft Dynamics NAV (formerly Navision) is designed to help organizations streamline specialized and industry-specific business processes. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2013. Microsoft Dynamics SL (formerly Solomon IV) can help project-driven organizations obtain reports and business analysis and automate projects across company divisions and locations. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics SL 7.0. Microsoft Dynamics C5 (formerly Concorde C5) can assist with finance, manufacturing, supply chains, analytics and electronic commerce for small and medium-sized enterprises. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics C5 2010. Capabilities[edit] Microsoft Dynamics ERP applications are designed to help customers: Connect the entire supply chain. Make current financial data and reports accessible for business planning and regulatory compliance.
  • Dolibarr Invoice for Multiple Projects

    Dolibarr Invoice for Multiple Projects

    Dolibarr Invoice For Multiple Projects Regardant Ajay deputised his sulphates outgush typographically. Air-cooled and nonagenarian Lev outstrip her nagger versts outwent and smoothens beastly. Ectogenetic Somerset frustrate her melanomas so muddily that Uriel dotings very shoreward. Automate stripe for invoice come in euros Managing customers is husband and Perfex CRM helps in several ways Manage and invoice projects with the axis Project Management Feature. Dolibarr ERP CRM is a modern software package to limp your. Splash Sync WordPress plugin WordPressorg. Orders management Invoices and payment management Shipping management. 2 Customer Relationship Project Management Software Customer. Dolibarr ERP CRM is a modern software package to clench your. Dolibarr vs Unanet Software Comparison TEC. Add message when enabling this university student records in just like tools, projects for dolibarr invoice multiple moving parts of web framework. Erp software solution for more resources, hospitality sector and to provide a credit or for multiple aspects of time for publishing your. Dolibarr odt template. Order the Receipt Purchase Invoice and Payment Entry in ERPNext. Dolibarr offers end-to-end management for pronounce and midsize. Supplier Proposal Supplier Invoices Supplier Orders Products services Member to type Projects project tasks since 34. Find invoicing extensions with Stripe's partner network can manage. My car especially likes the features of adding requests or projects to teammates. Dolibarr is income free open source contribute an all-in-one ERP and CRM for integrity and. Customer Invoice make brick the invoice module is turned Continue reading. Dolibarr-tasktrack Task 1909 token invoice for projects. Asana vs Dolibarr Comparison GetApp Ireland 2020.
  • Dynamics 365 Business Central On-Premises Licensing Guide

    Dynamics 365 Business Central On-Premises Licensing Guide

    Dynamics 365 Business Central on-premises Licensing Guide October 2018 Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central on-premises Licensing Guide | October 2018 Contents How to buy Dynamics 365 Business Central on-premises ................................................................................... 1 Perpetual Licensing ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Deploying Your Self-Managed Solution in an IaaS Environment ........................................................................................................... 2 Subscription Licensing ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Choosing the Appropriate SAL Type .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Subscription Licensing Term .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 How to use Dynamics 365 Business Central on-premises ................................................................................... 4 Licensing Requirement for Internal Users........................................................................................................................................................
  • Measuring Non Monetary Innovation in Software: a Case Study in Floss Firms from Argentina

    Measuring Non Monetary Innovation in Software: a Case Study in Floss Firms from Argentina

    International Journal of Innovation ISSN: 2318-9975 [email protected] Universidade Nove de Julho Brasil MEASURING NON MONETARY INNOVATION IN SOFTWARE: A CASE STUDY IN FLOSS FIRMS FROM ARGENTINA Motta, Jorge; Morero, Hernán Alejandro; Borrastero, Carina MEASURING NON MONETARY INNOVATION IN SOFTWARE: A CASE STUDY IN FLOSS FIRMS FROM ARGENTINA International Journal of Innovation, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019 Universidade Nove de Julho, Brasil Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=499165584008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i1.319 PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative MEASURING NON MONETARY INNOVATION IN SOFTWARE: A CASE STUDY IN FLOSS FIRMS FROM ARGENTINA ENSURANDO A INOVAÇÃO NÃO MONETÁRIA EM SOFTWARE: UM ESTUDO DE CASO EM EMPRESAS DE CÓDIGO ABERTO (FLOSS) DA ARGENTINA Jorge Moa [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina hps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1430-7009 Hernán Alejandro Morero [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Córdoba-UNC, Argentina hps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-1915 Carina Borrastero [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Córdoba-UNC, Argentina International Journal of Innovation, vol. hps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8754-1381 7, no. 1, 2019 Universidade Nove de Julho, Brasil DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/ iji.v7i1.319 Abstract: is paper presents a critical review of the design of innovation surveys that follow the Oslo Manual standards, based on a series of case studies in Free/Libre Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/ articulo.oa?id=499165584008 Open Source Soware (FLOSS) companies. e main objective of the article is to propose criteria for measuring innovation in soware that consider the specificities of the non-monetized innovation generated in the FLOSS community, helping to overcome relevant limitations of the current sectorial surveys based on the Oslo Manual.
  • Top 100 List

    Top 100 List

    Bob Scott’s TOP100 VARSpring 2018 s 2018 Growth and Transition Sponsored by BSI | Top 100 VARs 2018 Top100 VARs 2018 Growth and Transition hen Dave Kerr sold the majority ownership are the size of Arxis, who is going to of the reselling firm he founded in 1987 to be big enough to buy you other than a private equity firm Proviso early last year, CPA firm?” W it did a lot more than just provide him with Arxis Technology, long part of Top resources to expand Sage business. It was for his family. 100 lists, was acquired by RKL eSolu- “It’s probably the most unselfish thing I have done in tions, an arm of accounting firm RKL, my entire life,” says Kerr. in December. Many resellers have been Kerr’s position, looking Macdonald notes the resources for a way to receive as much value as possible from the accounting firms bring to the game. businesses they have operated for decades. And in the While VAR-VAR deals often involve Taylor Macdonald, mid-market, where there are ample stock, which may not deliver the value Sage Intacct numbers of gray-haired owners, figur- expected to the seller, “If you sell to ing out how to cash out is a major issue. a big CPA firm you, are assured of getting whatever they However, Kerr’s story also il- promised you,” he says. lustrates other trends in the indus- A standard reason given for the re-emergence of CPAs try—the expansion of firms to follow in this space is that the cloud products do not require them multi-site clients who purchase to build infrastructures laden with technology special- higher-end systems such as Enterprise ists.
  • ERP ΛΟΓΙΣΜΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟΥ ΚΩΔΙΚΑ Η ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ ODOO.Pdf

    ERP ΛΟΓΙΣΜΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟΥ ΚΩΔΙΚΑ Η ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ ODOO.Pdf

    ΤΕΧΝΟΛΟΓΙΚΟ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΤΙΚΟ ΙΔΡΥΜΑ ΔΥΤΙΚΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΟΣ ΣΧΟΛΗ ΔΙΟΙΚΗΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΑΣ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΔΙΟΙΚΗΣΗΣ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΕΩΝ (Πάτρα) Τίτλος Εργασίας ERP Λογισμικά Ανοικτού Κώδικα - Η περίπτωση του ODOO (πρώην OpenERP) Πτυχιακή Εργασία της ΔΟΥΡΑΜΑΝΗ ΣΤΑΜΑΤΙΑ Επιβλέπων :ΓΙΩΤΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ ΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΙΝΟΣ ΠΑΤΡΑ ,2015 2 ERP Λογισμικά Ανοικτού Κώδικα- Η περίπτωση του ODOO (πρώην OpenERP) Πίνακας περιεχομένων ΘΕΩΡΗΤΙΚΟ ΜΕΡΟΣ .......................................................................................................... 6 Κεφάλαιο 1ο ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Εισαγωγή ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Σκοπός και δομή της εργασίας ......................................................................................... 8 Κεφάλαιο 2ο Βασικές έννοιες ERP-Γενική περιγραφή ........................................................ 10 2.1 Ορίζοντας τα ERP .......................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Η ιστορική εξέλιξη των συστημάτων ERP .................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Επέκταση των ERP: Η μετάβαση από την εποχή των ERP στην εποχή των ERP IIΙ ......................................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Αρχιτεκτονική και δομή των ERP ................................................................................
  • Download PDF \\ Articles on Accounting Software, Including

    Download PDF \\ Articles on Accounting Software, Including

    [PDF] Articles On Accounting Software, including: Centraview, 24sevenoffice, Microsoft Dynamics Sl, Openda, Netsuite, Nolapro, Intacct, Gnucash,... Articles On Accounting Software, including: Centraview, 24sevenoffice, Microsoft Dynamics Sl, Openda, Netsuite, Nolapro, Intacct, Gnucash, Sql- ledger, Grisbi, Turbocash, Homebank, Jgnash, Apache Ofbiz Book Review Complete guide for ebook fans. Better then never, though i am quite late in start reading this one. Your life span will likely be convert when you full reading this ebook. (Dr. T eag an Beahan Sr. ) A RTICLES ON A CCOUNTING SOFTWA RE, INCLUDING: CENTRAV IEW, 24SEV ENOFFICE, MICROSOFT DYNA MICS SL, OPENDA , NETSUITE, NOLA PRO, INTA CCT, GNUCA SH, SQL- LEDGER, GRISBI, TURBOCA SH, HOMEBA NK, JGNA SH, A PA CHE OFBIZ - To download A rticles On A ccounting Software, including : Centraview, 24sevenoffice, Microsoft Dynamics Sl, Openda, Netsuite, Nolapro, Intacct, Gnucash, Sql-ledg er, Grisbi, Turbocash, Homebank, Jg nash, A pache Ofbiz eBook, you should click the hyperlink below and save the document or have accessibility to additional information that are in conjuction with Articles On Accounting Software, including: Centraview, 24sevenoffice, Microsoft Dynamics Sl, Openda, Netsuite, Nolapro, Intacct, Gnucash, Sql-ledger, Grisbi, Turbocash, Homebank, Jgnash, Apache Ofbiz ebook. » Download A rticles On A ccounting Software, including : Centraview, 24sevenoffice, Microsoft Dynamics Sl, Openda, Netsuite, Nolapro, Intacct, Gnucash, Sql-ledg er, Grisbi, Turbocash, Homebank, Jg nash, A pache Ofbiz PDF « Our website was launched using a aspire to serve as a total online electronic digital library which offers use of multitude of PDF file document collection. You might find many kinds of e-book as well as other literatures from the papers data source.
  • Oprogramowanie Klasy Erp Dystrybuowane Na Zasadach Licencji Open Source

    Oprogramowanie Klasy Erp Dystrybuowane Na Zasadach Licencji Open Source

    OPROGRAMOWANIE KLASY ERP DYSTRYBUOWANE NA ZASADACH LICENCJI OPEN SOURCE Stanisław IWAN Streszczenie: Jedn ą z istotnych trudno ści, zwi ązanych z wykorzystywaniem technologii informacyjnych do wspomagania procesów zarz ądzania s ą wysokie koszty zwi ązane z opłatami licencyjnymi za oprogramowanie komputerowe. Mog ą one ulec znacznemu obni żeniu przy zastosowaniu alternatywnych metod dystrybuowania programów. W opracowaniu przedstawiono ogólne zało żenia licencji open source oraz wybrane przykłady systemów klasy ERP dystrybuowanych na jej zasadach. Słowa kluczowe: ERP, licencje oprogramowania, otwarte oprogramowanie, open source, technologie sieciowe. 1. Wprowadzenie Jedn ą z istotnych trudno ści, zwi ązanych z wykorzystywaniem technologii informacyjnych do wspomagania procesów zarz ądzania s ą wysokie koszty z tym zwi ązane. Cho ć znaczn ą ich cz ęść stanowi ą koszty zakupu i eksploatacji sprz ętu komputerowego, to jednak koszty zakupu licencji oprogramowania mog ą w wielu wypadkach (szczególnie w odniesieniu do mocno wyspecjalizowanych zada ń) stanowi ć element dominuj ący i niekiedy znacznie przewy ższa ć koszty sprz ętu. Dodatkowo firmy software’owe stosuj ą ró żne metody utrzymania klientów i zapewnienia sobie stałego dopływu opłat licencyjnych. Przykładem niechaj b ędą niektóre kontrowersyjne zapisy, zawarte w umowach licencyjnych jednego z producentów, mówi ące, że: − użytkownik nie jest wła ścicielem oprogramowania, które zakupił; − użytkownik nie mo że uruchamia ć wi ęcej ni ż jednej kopii systemu; − system operacyjny stanowi cz ęść zestawu oprogramowanie-komputer, nie mo że zatem by ć u żytkowany na komputerze innym, ni ż ten na którym został zainstalowany i zarejestrowany po raz pierwszy; − producent nie ponosi odpowiedzialno ści za straty, jakie poniesie u żytkownik w skutek u żytkowania systemu (pomimo wysokich opłat licencyjnych).